Why does my diagram look so cluttered?

I've just written my first LabVIEW application that will be used to control instruments. It basically takes in laser light and tells how much light is in the beam at various wavelengths. I used some SubVI's, as you can see in the block diagram, but all of the other VI's that I download look so much cleaner.
Do I just try to make more and more SubVI's until my main VI looks clean? I kind of thought I was at the finished product, but I would like it to look much nicer, including a tabbed interface for the front panel. If you could tell me what my final block diagram should look like I think that would be a help too. Thanks!
P.S. hopefully it lets you look at it even if you don't have all the SubVI's, if not please let me know.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
DataSimulation.vi ‏146 KB

If you have LV 2009 the "Clean up Diagram button on the tool bar (far left) will give you an idea of how to clean up the diagram. ctrl-z if you don't like it. You can also select parts of the diagram and do the clean-up or exclude them from the clean-up.
What SHOULD the y look like?
Depends on your audience. in my case I amke them look like something the approves the invoices can understand.
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Similar Messages

Team Blog: Why does my page look different in BrowserLab?

Duane O'Brien, engineer on the BrowserLab team has a new blog post on the BrowserLab Team blog that you might find interesting. It covers when/why you might see rendering differences between the BrowserLab browsers and your local browsers. Good info.
http://blogs.adobe.com/browserlab/2011/07/11/why-does-my-page-look-different-in-browserlab /
Bruce
Bruce Bowman
BrowserLab product manager
BrowserLab Team Blog: http://blogs.adobe.com/browserlab
Twitter: @brucebowman, @adobebrowserlab

As Wyodor indicated IE is not the most advance, up-to-date browser out there.
See Roddy’s tips for making iWeb pages more compatible with IE.
OT

Why does my 24fps look bad on my TV?

I just got the Panasonic AG-HMC150. I have shot some footage at both 1080p24 and 720p24. I transcode the files to Pro Res in FCP and they look pretty good, I realize the panning isn't as smooth as 60i. I drag one of the files into the FCP timeline and let it automatically "optimize my settings" for the sequence. I have verified that it is 23.98fps and field dominance is none. I have tried selecting "share" and going straight to AVCHD from FCP, and also taking the original MTS file, and Apple Pro Res and dropping into Toast and trying that way. The footage just looks choppy, jiddery and unsmooth. I have seen enough movies in my life to know that when they pan, or have cars drive by, that movies 24fps looks a million times better. My Sony HDTV even accepts and displays 24fps, and when I press info on the TV remote when watching one of these AVCHD discs it in fact says 1080 (or 720) 24p. It just looks bad. Even taking the HDMI output from the camera and hooking up to the TV and playing from the camera looks lousy.
What am I doing wrong? I know a ton of post work goes into Hollywood movies, but why does their 24fps look nice and smooth and mine looks horrible? Do I need to render with pulldown in FCP or something. I can't figure it out. Any advice, suggestions?

I transcode through FCP to apple pro res, the files shows up as 1920x1080 24fps. Field dominance is none. I edit the video and then export as quicktime movie using current settings. The Pro Res file says 23.98 when played in quicktime so I know that's good. I simply then drop the file into Toast (10.0.4) and burn blu-ray disc, selecting DVD as the media. I noticed too I need to change the field dominance under the encoding tab in Toast to progressive, as automatic doesn't work. It only burns the top half of the image. Regardless, when I make these discs and play them on PS3, my TV's info says 1080/24p. Maybe my eyes aren't use to seeing 24fps. Does it sound like I am doing anything wrong in my workflow/encoding process.
Again, good tip on the shutter speed Jerry.

Why does the videos looks so slow

why does the videos looks so slow only in the internet

Many reasons, like what format they are, for instance Flash Videos will be slower.
Any links to the slow ones?
Which exact Mac do you have?

Why does my site look nothing like the design and during testing once uploaded to the server?

Why does my site look nothing like the design and during testing once uploaded to the server?,
Im using Muse whichj crashes like you would not beleive, but after much perseverance I got a basic 4 page holding site together, I tested the site and it all looked fine, when I uploaded it to the server it looks nothing like the site I tested, to the point that even the background has changed colour and nothing is in the rite place.

Hi John, Sure it's
http://www.thezine.co.uk
thanks
it should be looking like this

Why does my PDF look so CRAPPY when I print through acrobat???

I have been having troubles with exporting a PDF from an Indesign file.. when I printed the exported PDF from acrobat, text was printing out very pixelated. I was exporting the file in indesign as a press quality pdf. The text looked fine when I viewed it in acrobat and zoomed in, but when I printed it out it looked very pixelated and not as black as it had when I had printed the file directly from indesign.
so this is what I've figured it out so far... I was exporting to PDF in indesign then opening it in adobe arobat pro and printing from there... for some reason when I went into my advanced print settings in acrobat, it was set to "print as image: 100 dpi." I changed it and it printed out better but not perfect. To double check it was adobe that was causing the issue, I opened and printed the pdf through mac preview. This looked perfect - - exactly like it did when I printed through INDD.
So my questions are, 1> WHY does it automatically printing as an image 100 dpi in adobe? and 2> how can I change this setting so when my client opens it up, they dont have to mess with any of the print settings to get it to look how it's supposed to? Is this a setting I can change when I save the file? I want to make sure it prints out correctly because one of the fonts used is ultralight and can look very very light if printed incorrecty. It looks perfect when I print through preview, but even printing as an image in 600 dpi through acrobat pro, the ultralight font looks lighter and more faded than it should (and than it does in the preview and INDD printed files). If i unselect the "print as image" checkbox, the ultralight text looks better but still not perfect. So that would make my second question >> WHY is the print quality worse when I print through adobe, and how can I remedy this? Any ideas??? Any help much appreciated!
**using acrobat pro 9.4.6 on mac osx 10.6.8

The PDF file itself does not control the "print as image" preference, which should always be turned OFF unless there's a specific need to rasterize the entire page, and is turned off by default in all Acrobat and Adobe Reader installations.
What's the filetype for the ultralight font and what export setting* are you using in ID? If you're exporting to earlier than PDF1.7, OpenType fonts will be converted and may experience some small changes in shape if their hint definitions aren't done right.
*As a side note, bear in mind that InDesign does not use any part of Acrobat when exporting PDFs, so questions specific to that stage in the process should be posted to the InDesign forums.

Why does my type look bitmapped (jaggies)

Why does my title type look bitmapped (jaggies)? It's fine in iMovie but looks crappy once I burn the DVD. The max. resolution is 720 x 540.

Hi
There are at least two levels on this Q:
• iMovie'08 to 11 can not deliver Interlaced SD-Video over to iDVD but discard every second line resulting in a quality loss. I use iMovie HD6 or FinalCut
• The way one goes from iM'08 to 11 to iDVD matters to a GREAT degree. I never use in any version of iMovie "Share to iDVD" as this set's off iMovie rendering function - and it's bad. I do.
Share to Media Browser - and as Large - NOT HD or other resolution as this too degrades the out-come.
Yours Bengt W

Why does my color look so different in CS5 compared to CS4?

Hi everyone,
I am currently working on a document in InDesign CS5...have placed some CMYK artwork that I created in Photoshop CS5. All of my color settings are synchronized. Why does the color in the artwork look SO different compared to Photoshop? If I place the same artwork into InDesign CS4, everything matches as it should (once again, all applications use the same color settings/are synchronized).
I am completely baffled...what am I missing? Is there another setting I have missed out on within InDesign?
Thank you,
Christine

Okay....you are not going to believe this!! Perhaps this is a bug or perhaps this is a one-time-mystery-of-the-unexplained thing.
I went into my desktop version of CS5 and loaded completely different color settings...pressed okay, then went BACK straight away and reloaded my usual [custom] color settings and all suddenly looked PERFECT. [I am going to have to verify this when I go into work tomorrow as I just tested via remote login so am looking at things via my macbook screen. The color difference was VERY noticeable at first between the two ID versions on my desktop so I was able to easily tell. Now they look the same.
All in all, than you SO much for your help (so this was *not* a waste of time). All this troubleshooting really helped me a lot as to what to look for in future similar instances.
Christine

Why does my text look jagged in Fireworks CS4?

I have had it up to here with fireworks CS4. I can't figure out why my text looks like my dog chewed on it. If Fireworks CS4 has the same text engine as Illustrator than why does my Text in Illustrator look crisp but my text in fireworks looks jagged. I tried using anti-lising but that didn't help. I know there's been a lot of text issues with Fireworks CS4 but I thought the bugs were all fixed by now. Check out the attatchments to see what I'm talking about.

I posted a similar discussion a few months ago and while many were very helpful with their suggestions I have all but given up with using text in Fireworks.
It just isn't worth the bother when other applications can do text with no fuss and no messing with sizes and resolutions. I tend to use illustrator or dare I say it, Paintshop Pro which produces text easily and clearly within a text box or over an image
I'm keeping an eye on your discussion to see if there are any new words of wisdom. Here's hoping.
Sorry I can't offer any advice

Why does the Video looks Pixelated after Burning DVD

In IDVD when I preview the video it looks great, when I burn the DVD it comes out very very pixelated. I've changed the preferences from Best Performance to Best Quality, and the project properties as well I've done the same. Does anyone know why this is happening?
I'm using 16:4 aspect ratio Video Size is 1280x720
Help

How are you viewing the DVD you created - on a computer or on a TV?
In IDVD when I preview the video it looks great
The preview uses your original content on your hard drive and is simply designed to allow you to see if the 'flow' (sequences, menus, etc) are what you wanted.
In addition, although iDVD 'supports' HD, it only supports it in the context of current specifications - not the new HD DV world that has two competing HD DVD formats.
This means your 1280x720 content gets downsized and compressed to fit on a 720x480 DVD. The video must be 'expanded' to play on a HD set.
BTW, your aspect ratio is 16:9 and NOT 16:4. 16:4 would REALLY be widescreen! I haven't seen THAT spec yet.

Why Does my site look different on my computer

My site, www.aaronapter.com, looks completely different on my computer than when I view it on another computer. It actually looks like my browser is accessing the files from my HD instead of the internet. Any ideas why? I ask because I want to fix some errors on my published site, such as a fonts appearing differently and the spacing of a page being totally messed up. Again, this doesn't happen when I view it on my computer, but it does on others. Any help? I'm using iWeb '08.
Message was edited by: 2A Batterie

Is it just fonts? If so, the challenge is that you're using fonts that are only on your system and not others. There's a bit of a tricky fix but it'll force fonts to be graphics.
I'm not too sure about this approach but it seems simple enough: http://podcast.eusd4kids.org/groups/teacherresources/weblog/a91d4/iWeb__fonts_displayed_asgraphics.html
This appoarch is a tad trickier but I found it easy:
http://11mystics.com/2007/09/12/how-can-i-ensure-the-fonts-i-use-will-look-good- on-a-pc/
In short, go to Applications, control-click on iWeb and choose Show Package Contents. Then open Contents, then Resources, and then double-click on FontMapping.plist. Look for the special font that you're using and change false/ to true/like this:
<key>AmericanTypewriter</key>
<dict>
<key>Generic</key>
<string>serif</string>
<key>Image</key>
<true/> <=== change this from false/ to true/
<key>Windows</key>
<string>Courier New</string>

Why does my encode look bad?!?

OK! Here are my problems.
My source material is a Quicktime movie, Animation codec, rendered from After Effects. 1280x720 at 23.976fps. It looks great. The duration is about 3 minutes in length.
I have taken that footage and encoded it using Sorenson Squeeze 5 into .mp4 files (h.264) using the Sorenson codec, the Main Concepts codec and the Apple codec. All at VBR rate of 20Mbits.
Problem #1: Importing pre-encoded files into Encore results in Encore wanting to transcode them again. I never had this problem with SD DVDs, but it seems I cannot import h.264 files without Encore wanting to re-encode them.
Problem #2: Well, I guess I am stuck using Encore's built in encoder. This sucks because I like the additional controls I have encoding using Sorenson. Sooooo, I transcoded my uncompressed Apple Animation Quicktime file and then I built a folder.
The problem with #2 is that Encore's encode looks like crap. Text and images clearly appear aliased. Maybe it is converting the video to 50i instead of keeping it at 24p, but my project settings are clearly set for 24p. As a test, I used the VLC player to play the files out of the encoded folder as well as within the Encore environment.
So, first of all, why won't Encore work with my files I encoded/transcoded in Sorenson Squeeze? I know these files are encoded great, they look great... what's up?!?!
Second, anyone else experiencing odd issues with transcoding in Encore?
Thanks everyone.

John,
Ok. Here is our production process for the majority of our work:
1. Sources are either still pictures, vector art, or 24p (23.976). We are pretty effect heavy, so virtually everything gets finished in After Effects. We used to utilize higher-end software, but these days AE works fine for 90% of the workload.
2. We then render to Quicktime - Animation - 100 quality. This is a lossless codec and gives you some pretty huge files. We tried AVI files, but those ended up larger. We render to 23.976 progressive, no fields at all.
3. Into Sorenson Squeeze where we encode into On2 .fla files to display in Flash. Soon we will dual encode in On2 and h.264 for use in Flash. If the end-user is running the newer Flash 9 player, it will pull the h.264 files otherwise it will run the On2.
Now, everything we author is at 720/24p. For the web we pretty much just half the vertical and horizontal resolution (640x360). But for Blu-Ray, we have our source Quicktime animation at full 720/HD resolution.
4. We now open the Quicktime (Apple Animation Codec) into Preimere where we just drop it on the timeline and use the Adobe Media Encoder to generate a Blu-Ray H.264 file. We make sure to uncheck the deinterlace button as it is on by default (even known the source is progressive). This is where Encore fails. Encore seems to deinterlace period, so if your source is already progressive, Encore does a great job of making it look worse by deinterlacing non-interlaced footage.
(Note: Make sure when you encode in Premiere that your maximum bit rate on export is not greater than what you set in Encore or else Encore might transcode again)
5. Import your files into Encore. Your video file and audio file will be two different files. Oh, to encode in Dolby Digital out of Preimere you need a license. We have the Master Collection, but I am not sure if we got a license for that included? However, I am sure you can load up a number of other applications to generate your Dolby digital audio file if you need that. We use used PCM for these jobs, seemed fine.
Burn your Blu-Ray.
Things that still don't work:
h.264 content seems to only import from Premiere properly. I have used a number of encoders now to create Blu-Ray compliant h.264 and every time Encore wants to re-transcode them. Come on Adobe! This bug deserves a patch, seriously.
If you use a progressive clip as an animated menu, Encore deinterlaces it!! And I cannot find a way, at all, to get around that. Again, come on. What is up with the deinterlacing by default in Encore. Even when I need footage deinterlaced Encore is the last tool I would want doing the job!
Blu-ray authoring in Encore is slow. Moments before you will be in Premiere and then when you move to Encore it will feel as though your working through a molasses filter. In addition, Encore is flaky and sometimes your projects will get weirded out and you have to re-build them from scratch.
How about this, new rule, all Adobe employees are required to build 5 blu-ray discs this month. Two of them have to have animated backgrounds. Three should be built with progressive source material, one with interlaced material and one with mixed material. All of them should have professional video quality in the final disc.
Now, report to yourselves the massive amount of bugs you find and get them fixed. You will probably need to put a large portion of your workforce in therapy after being subjected to this process... just FYI.

Why does De-interlacing looks better with MPEG StreamClip?

For our client we need to render 1080i for TV and 1080p for WEB. After creating graphics in AE we add final touch and audio in PR.
If we make it progressive in PR (CC2014.1) the zoom in the packshot does not look good.
However if we make the 1080i ProRes progressive in MPEG Streamclip the zoom does look great.
How is it possible a freeware swiss army-knife makes a better progressive export than commercial software?
Or is there something we do wrong?
Herewith links to the ProRes material:
1 1080i rendered from AE: http://gvs.ftpaccess.cc/_q8w_U9SXYWR6tR
2 1080p rendered from AE: http://gvs.ftpaccess.cc/_WSw7A_kh-W66sR
3 1080p rendered with PR: http://gvs.ftpaccess.cc/_dAxuZAvbVWP6AR
4 1080p rendered with MPEG StreamClip: http://gvs.ftpaccess.cc/_nQwqP-HqMWz6FR
Please do not use this material elsewhere except for testing purposes.
Thank you in advance!
Ivery Barel
Gooi & Vecht Studio - Netherlands
OSX 10.9.5. Mavericks

ok
just to illustrate the problem a little better, here's the actual difference
this is what I have in Lightroom after editing:
and here's what I get after exporting

Why does my cmus look like this?

It's in a screen session on Leopards terminal. It didn't do this before and I haven't updated anything and I'm confused. If I go to the cmus window, the rest of the screen windows look like that too and when I detach the term looks like that.
hrm, it only does it when I do
ssh -t me@foo 'screen -rd'
if I just ssh then do screen it doesn't
Last edited by tladuke (2010-05-04 15:40:04)

Supposed to be plain old english. Leopard terminal says it does UTF-8, but I'm pretty sure I removed all the foreign languages.
The weird part now is that it only does it when I put screen in my ssh command. Let me bold that part. I can live with hitting up arrow every time I login from this computer.
Last edited by tladuke (2010-05-04 15:40:47)

Why does progressive footage look interlace?

I shot using 30p with a panisonic dvx100, at 120 shutter speed, with auto irus. While importing, the footage looked great (imported using Adobe pro). Using Adobe pro. the footage looks interlace. Why and how do I fix this problem. I heard that de-interlace reduces the quality but the fact is I should'nt have to, since the footage was shot in progressive. If you know the answer I can really use you're help.

Which version of the software are you using: CS3 or earlier, or CS4? No version includes a pre-built preset for working with DV 30p footage. In CS3 and earlier, you have to set up a custom project, whereas in CS4, you setup a custom sequence. In either case, when you create a new project (<CS3) or sequence (CS4), click the General tab, and change the Field dropdown to "No Fields (Progressive Scan)". You don't need to change anything else, unless, for example, you're working with widescreen footage--change those parameters if necessary. When you're done, save this as a new DV 30p preset.
Now, you may also need to interpret your 30p footage as progressive--I'm not quite sure how 30p capture works in PPro. Select your clips in the bin, and go to File > Interpret Footage. From the pop-up that appears, under Field Order, select Conform To: No Field (Progressive Scan). As I said, I'm not sure if Premiere knows on capture how to interpret 30p footage or not, so this may not be necessary.

Why does my diagram look so cluttered?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for