Why does my Shuffle sound better than my Nano?

I have a 1st Gen Shuffle and a 2nd Gen Nano. I run them both from the same computer, using the same version of iTunes on the same account.
Unless my ears are playing me up the sound from the shuffle seems to be better. The nano sometimes sounds a bit fuzzy on bass notes, this is particularly noticeable on bass drum beats where the beat sounds almost crackly. I particularly noticed this on the Amy Winehouse album (May mean nothing to you)and thought it may be authentic crackle from a sampled drum loop, but it does not do this on the shuffle.
I have swapped the headphones and fiddled with the Eq on the Nano, which can sometimes improve but not remove the problem.
Is there anything I can do or is this just one of those things?
17 inch Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GHz,4Gb iPod Nano, 1st Gen iPod Shuffle   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   Also iMacG3 CRT Slot Loading iMac 600Mhz (10.1.5)

Unless my ears are playing me up the sound from the
shuffle seems to be better. The nano sometimes sounds
a bit fuzzy on bass notes, this is particularly
noticeable on bass drum beats where the beat sounds
almost crackly. I particularly noticed this on the
Amy Winehouse album (May mean nothing to you)and
thought it may be authentic crackle from a sampled
drum loop, but it does not do this on the shuffle.
I have swapped the headphones and fiddled with the Eq
on the Nano, which can sometimes improve but not
remove the problem.
Is there anything I can do or is this just one of
those things?
It's one of those things... the 1st Gen Shuffle has a different processor (sigmatel) AND a different digital audio decoder chip from the 2nd Gen nano (Samsung) which, in turn has a processor and digital decoder related to the 2nd Gen Shuffle.
It's one of life's strange turns that the 1st Gen Shuffle seems to have the BEST audio performance (although without builtin equalization) of the iPods.

Similar Messages

  • Why does iPhone (3gs) sound better than Macs via Bluetooth?

    Why does my iPhone (3gs) sound so much better via Bluetooth on my (Jawbone) Jambox than my new Mac Mini or 3 year old MacBook Pro?  Proxmity is about the same and doesn't seem to make a difference.
    sound from via Bluetooth sounds muted like in a cave or can, pretty darn good from the iPhone, ideas? (in a test I did with a Braven speaker via Bluetooth = same, in that case the Macs sounded even worse!)
    Thanks,
    Paul

    If I were you then I would have asked this question in the mac forums
    as people there have a much much higher chance of owning those macs then people in the iphone forum who could own windows computer or linux computer or no computer at all

  • Why does my PS work better than my Lightroom 5 exporting jpegs from raw files?

    So,
    I'm editing some raw files with Lightroom 5
    but when I export the jpg file, the result is terrible, it looks washed out, loses contrast, noise levels are higher than the edited file on suite
    However, if I do the same thing using camera raw through PsCS6, the exported jpg is perfect. Any reason for that to happen?
    've been reading a lot about color spaces, and I don't think is the case, since the same doesn't happen with photoshop.
    Also, it might be worth mentioning I'm exporting B&W images
    Thanks!

    ok
    just to illustrate the problem a little better, here's the actual difference
    this is what I have in Lightroom after editing:
    and here's what I get after exporting

  • HT4759 Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?

    Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?

    chewy cabeza wrote:
    Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?
    From your point of view and the framing of your question, Apple does indeed support WIndows better than Mac for the limited issue of iCloud.
    chewy cabeza wrote:
    ...YET, Leopard and Snow Leopard are NOT iCloud compatible. How can that be justified? Obviously, Apple can make iCloud available to Snow Leopard, but disdains us...
    Historically speaking, Apple has rarely gone backwards in its OS development.  Once they have released a new OS with new technology, I can only think of one example of when they backtracked:  They released TrueType technology in System 7 and then released System 6.0.8, which included TrueType technology for continuing System 6 users.
    So it is part of their culture to move forward and not backwards.  Other examples:
    •  Inclusion of the then novel SONY 3.5" disk drive in its release of the first Macintosh (and not the industry standard 5.25" drive); after its use in the Lisa and adoption for the Apple II series of computers.
    •  Elimination of the floppy drive completely in the release of the first iMac.
    •  Use of then novel AAC audio compression as "state of the art" compression for the iPod release in 2001 instead of the outdated mp3 standard.
    •  Refusal to allow use of FLASH in iPod Touch/iPhone/iPads.
    How could they justify these decisions?  The marketplace justified them for Apple!
    So, yes, they could release 10.6.9 with iCloud support.  But why now, if not then?

  • "Why Does The Shuffle Songs Feature Perform So Poorly?"

    How'dee,
    I have an iPod 160G Classic, I've spent the last 3 months taking my 2,247 "Owned" cd's (I'm a retired dj), an ripped them with identical settings and transfered them flawlessly onto my iPod. I now have a total of 26,311 tracks on my iPod. "FWI"- I tranfered each "Complete" album, no individual tracks... I had been looking forward to being able to Shuffle through my music and not actually listening to individual ablums at a time. I work as a security guard and I am able/allowed to use my iPod via my Bose dock.
    I have been listening to my iPod in Shuffle Mode for 3 full weeks now and I am finding that I'm continually listening to the same 30 or so albums out of the full 2,247 that are on my iPod, sometimes it will actually play a song from a perticular album and then play Another track from that same album within the next 10 - 15 tracks!
    In the end I'm hearing One New Track that I haven't heard yet every 15 - 20 or so tracks while at the same time I'm hearing tracks from the same albums and or groups throughout the 15 - 20 tracks that have played... As an example, I have 4 albums from the group KISS, I hear tracks from those 4 albums atleast 3 - 5 times every day - day & half... Why does the Shuffle Mode work so poorly? I can't see for the life of me why the so-called "Shuffle Mode" doesn't Shuffle through "ALL" of the 2,247 tracks that are on the iPod.
    I've even gone as far as to use a cable to plug my iPod into a regular radio allowing me "Not" to charge my iPod until the battery is almost dead, allowing it to play continuously for my entire 8 hour shift in Shuffle Mode. And then just resume the next shift for another 8 hours, again, until the battery is almost dead. I've gotten around 35+ hours per charge over the last 2 weeks.
    "My whole reason for spending $350. on this iPod was so that I could listen to my album collection as though I were listening to a radio... shuffling through "All" of my tracks. I'm now sitting here kicking myself in the a$$ for seemingly wasting my money..."
    Any insight would be appreciated.
    And just to let it be known, I have attempted to play tracks manually just to see if they are even workable transfers and I haven't come across any problems with the music that I put on the iPod.
    The ToxicOne...

    It is true - "random" does not mean that you should not hear two songs from the same album (or artist) in close proximity. However, as the number of albums increases, the likelihood of hearing multiple (sometimes three or four) cuts from the same album decreases. And the chances of this happening EVERY time a new shuffle is started is even less likely. Comparing flipping a coin (a 0.5 probability of any given result) to a library with over 2000 albums (a .0005 probability of a track from any given album) is comparing apples to oranges. Also, given one of the posts above which indicated hearing the same *progression of songs* indicates that the mathematical algorithm used by Apple to simulate randomness (as there is no such thing as true randomness in computer programming) is just not up to snuff.

  • When I click on a website in my reading list, why does top sites open rather than the site I've clicked on?

    When I click on a website in my Reader list in Safari, why does Top Sites open rather than the website I've clicked on?

    Go step by step and test.
    Reset Safari.
    Click Safari in the menu bar.
    From the drop down select "Reset Safari".
    Click "Reset".
    Delete Cookies
    Safari > Preferences > Privacy > Cookies and other website data:
    Click “Remove All Website Data”.
    Empty Caches
    Safari > Preference > Advanced
    Checkmark the box for "Show Develop menu in menu bar".
    Develop menu will appear in the Safari menu bar.
    Click Develop and select "Empty Caches" from the dropdown.
    Turn off Extensions if any, and launch Safari.
    Safari > Preferences > Extensions

  • Song on youtube sounds better than the on bought on iTunes

    Hi,
    Having just migrated to iTM, I was having a listen to some songs when I noticed one song - Gigi's 'Bale Washintu' - sounded distorted on the chorus (around 3:45).
    To doublecheck it wasn't my speakers or soundcard I played the youtube version and it sounded better than the one on my iTM.
    To doublecheck doublecheck I bought the original song again from iTunes and STILL the youtube version sounded less distorted.
    Can the Youtube version be better sounding then a 256kbps itunes download??

    Keep in mind, if you bought this from Apple or an Apple Store, you only have 14 days from initial purchase to return it for a full refund (in the USA at least).
    If it is past that 14 day window, you will have to sell it privately and then buy a different machine.
    If you bought from an Apple authorized reseller, then be sure to check what their return period and polciy is.

  • IPod better than the nano?

    Do you think that the nano is better than the real iPods? I think that the real iPod is better than the nano because it has all the same features as the nano execpt the nano is smaller. But the real iPod makes up for that by having more songs than the nanos. So what do you think?

    i love my nano its the best.
    Nano 4GB black,Moto RAZR V3 black, PSP, all kinds of cases for nano,radio/remote   Windows XP   <img src="http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e13/superman5656/s.gif"align="right"</span>

  • Why is MME playing much better than ASIO4ALL

    I have a 64 bit acer Aspire R7 with 8GB RAM and runing windows 8.1. i have bin using adobe audition(now using CS6) for about 10 years now and i have never found myself havin this problem:
    1)It so happens that my MME drivers are giving less glitches than the ASIO4ALL.(no matter how much i play around with the buffer size)
    2)when using the asio4all during play back,the volume is lower compared to that of the MME drivers.
    3)the asio4all icon on the system tray keeps flickering from play(green) to an exclamation mark(red) constantly
    i cant use my MME for my projects coz i gat quite a bunch of plugins waiting to join the party...hence it will start glitching too sooner than later(((pliz help!!!help help help!!!! 

    I'm usin the onboard soundcard.i know have to get an external USB soundcard(guilty)...money issues.((but the thing is i used to run the same version of audition on a much smaller laptop(hp,32 bit,3GB RAM) and it worked far much better than the acer.when i play audio in audition with plugin effects:MME used to lag while ASIO4ALL would play it smoothly.n now i have rather the opposite situation.
    ryclark wrote:
    What audio interface are you using with Audition? If you are using the onboard soundcard you would be much better off using an external USB connected one with proper ASIO drivers which bypass the operating system completely.
    There should be no difference between using ASIO4All and MME drivers since ASIO4All uses the windows drivers anyway. It converts them to ASIO for audio interfaces that don't have ASIO drivers. However from what I hear Win 8.1 may be causing the problem with your glitchy audio especially if you are using the built in audio
    What do you mean there is no difference between ASIO4ALL and MME drivers?then why does audition prompt to use ASIO4ALL if available??

  • Why doesn't my new Audigy 2 ZS sound better than my old Vibra, and what does emulated me

    Hi there. I've bought a new Audigy 2 ZS to replace my fi've year old Vibra PCI 28, and imagine my surprise to discover there doesn't seem to be any difference in the sound quality when playing games. I was wondering if there's something I haven't set up properly, perhapse something not mentioned in the instructions that newbies usually miss.
    Also, with my Vibra I had the volume sliders nearly at the bottom, but with the new card I have to put them half way up to get the same volume. Does that indicate a problem? (I use headphones and I have headphones selected under Advanced Audio Properties)
    And on Dxdiag on the Sound tab it says the Audigy is Emulated. Should it say that?
    Thank you kindly. I just need to know if I should be worried about any of this or if it's to be expected.

    Thanks, I'll try that and put it in a different pci slot also.
    I noticed after the software installation there was a lot of stuff being loaded at startup and I removed those with a little program I've got. Would that make a difference to this problem? I tried a game before removing them and didn't notice a difference though. Perhapse I shouldn't have been so quick to remove them.
    One question... could you tell me if this bit in the instructions...
    "Go to Control Panel, System, Device Manager button and delete sound card entries in Sound, Video and Game Controllers as well as any previous sound card entries from the Device Manager."
    refers to Audio Codecs, Legacy Audio Drivers, Media Control Devices and MPU-40 Compatible MIDI Device?Message Edited by Phil5000 on 09-03-2005 0:49 AM

  • Why is WAP54G RPT MODE better than WRE54G?

    Hello,
    I have a project to expand a wireless network to another building with two floors.  The proximity is close (literally only 15 feet between the walls), but only clients with great antennas/wifi cards would be able to reach the router in the main building, so I want to expand the wireless signal into the new building.  The new building is two floors high, has no dropped ceiling or other ceiling/wall access, there is no conduit available between buildings, and no feasible way to run a wire, so my only real choice is to expand the signal coverage from the main building to the new building via wifi.  I have read many posts on many different forums covering this topic.  I understand that having multiple WRE54G repeaters has created reliability issues for some people.  Too bad, because these are nice, discrete little units and would be ideal for what I need to do.  I have seen several people recommend WAP54G units in repeater mode (no hardwired connection to the main router) in place of WRE54G units.  What is the difference?  Are they technically doing the same thing, and do you lose bandwidth by half with either unit?  Is it just that the WAP54G has been more reliable?  Not that bandwidth is my most important concern, reliability is my main concern, but I do have to deal with the issue of mounting these high on interior walls.  Does the WRE54G v3 exhibit the same problematic issues that previous versions 1 and 2 did?  I have a WRE54G v3 that I installed, and upgraded the firmware.  I have to admit, setting it up with a WRT54G was problematic, but once it was set up, it hasn't lost its link since (just going on one week now).  I do not have WEP enabled yet, I'm just using MAC address filtering from the WRT54G.  My proposed configuration is:
    WAP54G in main building, just inside the outer wall.
    WRE54G in the 2nd building on the first floor.
    WRE54G in the 2nd building on the second floor.
    Both WRE54G devices would directly connect to the WAP54G, one would not connect through another.  Does anyone see any potential problems?  Also, we have an extra WRT300N that was donated that we were just going to use as a WAP by deconflicting the IP with the router and turning off DHCP.  Any problems using the WRE54G with the WRT300N?
    Thanks in advance to all that reply for your experience and insight.

    Thanks again for your response.  It is not practical to run an Ethernet cable from building one to building two, that's why I'm finding this to be a little extra complicated.  The conduit situation is a total mess and they left no pull-throughs.  Outdoor routing is not an option either.  Thanks for your comment on the umbrella coverage characteristic, I had not heard that before but that will definitely be taken into consideration with our placement of the client-specific WAP.  It's not a simple two-story building - the first floor is longer than the second floor, and the extra large space on the first floor is at one end and is where most of the WAP clients will be located.  We'll be doing a lot of testing.
    After performing more exhaustive research on these devices, I have decided to use the entry-level small business line - like a WAP54GP - because I need to have reliable wireless bridging between buildings one and two.  However, everything I've read about units in this category shows that the N+gr model WG 102 has the same capabilities and performs noticeably better, especially at extended range.  It's just a little more difficult to configure, but most people are very impressed with it.  I purchased a WAP54GP anyway for testing purposes and will be able to compare the two in actual use.

  • Why is my mbpro mic better than my usb

    I bought a decent plantronics usb microphone - but people keep on telling me the mac mic is better, when they talk to me online. Does anyone know why this is - been through a bunch of usb mics and this is usually the case.  It's annoying because it means i have to speak louder for them to hear me, or can't close the mbpro (I'm usually connected to an external monitor).
    Anyone recommend any microphones?

    Have you tried adjusting the input volume for your USB mic? System Prefs > Sound > Input tab > select the mic > adjust the input volume slider.

  • Why does my shuffle have little skips in it during playback?

    I have restored, reloaded, and completely started from scratch with putting music on my shuffle. When I get done and listen to it, there are little noise distortions on and off throughout the songs. Kind of like an electronic blip or a little sound skip. Apple said my cds could be the problem because the shuffle is 100% sound clarity, I just find this odd because I have directly loaded 1800 songs onto ITunes from my collection, and it happens in all of them. Even better, I just spent 10 hours converting them all into MP3 with a higher bitrate to maybe fix this. Didn't work. Any suggestions. This is the second shuffle and they have both done this.

    It seems that my pc does not like the shuffle. I put it on another pc and do not have any problems with the sound.

  • Why Does FIOS Quantum Offer Less than Comcast Xfinity?

    It is coming time for my FIOS contract to be renewed and I am having a hard time justifying renewing it.  FIOS Quantum was a huge disappointment for us because:
    1. The Remote control lag is terrible, even trying all the reboots etc. IR remotes have been around for ages, this should work, AND it's ridiculous to have to shutdown and reboot all the set top boxes to fix a memory leak at this stage of programming.
    2. Althoough the VMS1100 has eSATA ports, they are not enabled.  You cannot export shows to a computer or an external hard drive, both of which I could do with TiVo.
    3. ALthough FIOS has an app for my iPad, all I can do is "see" and set up recordings, I can't watch anything from my DVR on my iPad or a Windows PC, AND the FIOS app ONLY works when it's on the same WiFi Network as the DVR, it doesn't;t work over the Internet. 
    In theory at least Comcast Xfinity does all of the above.
    So my question is, why should I stick with FIOS?  I hve read the forums for months and there is no word from Verizon that they acknowledge these deficits to Xfinity, much less that they have any plans to address these shortfalls in the future.
    Without the hope that Verizon is addressing their shortcomings, maybe it is time to move on to what seems to be the better wide area connected service.

    I agree. They have stolen more of my life then that even.

  • Why does De-interlacing looks better with MPEG StreamClip?

    For our client we need to render 1080i for TV and 1080p for WEB. After creating graphics in AE we add final touch and audio in PR.
    If we make it progressive in PR (CC2014.1) the zoom in the packshot does not look good.
    However if we make the 1080i ProRes progressive in MPEG Streamclip the zoom does look great.
    How is it possible a freeware swiss army-knife makes a better progressive export than commercial software?
    Or is there something we do wrong?
    Herewith links to the ProRes material:
    1 1080i rendered from AE: http://gvs.ftpaccess.cc/_q8w_U9SXYWR6tR
    2 1080p rendered from AE: http://gvs.ftpaccess.cc/_WSw7A_kh-W66sR
    3 1080p rendered with PR: http://gvs.ftpaccess.cc/_dAxuZAvbVWP6AR
    4 1080p rendered with MPEG StreamClip: http://gvs.ftpaccess.cc/_nQwqP-HqMWz6FR
    Please do not use this material elsewhere except for testing purposes.
    Thank you in advance!
    Ivery Barel
    Gooi & Vecht Studio - Netherlands
    OSX 10.9.5. Mavericks

    ok
    just to illustrate the problem a little better, here's the actual difference
    this is what I have in Lightroom after editing:
    and here's what I get after exporting

Maybe you are looking for

  • High level and low level grabs

    Hi, I'm looking at different acquisition options. Fast acquisition is a priority as is fast processing. I'm a little confused on high level versus low level. Is there any benefit to which one is used? Or is it 6 one way and 1/2 a dozen the other. Tha

  • How do i delete history - in ios6 i tapped home key twice, then could hold on an app and delete history.  how do i do this in ios 7?

    how do i delete history - in ios6 i tapped home key twice, then could hold on an app and delete history.  how do i do this in ios 7?

  • New to Flash...sorry

    I have been doing some Flash tutorials and trying to learn as much as I can however I can't seem to find a tut for the following task I have, any help would be appreciated. I am trying to do a very simple project that requires; A web banner with five

  • Average of array elements

    Hi, I have a VI that's acquire data from Compact Field Point. These data come from cFP like an array. But I need acquire these data three times and, so, average them. There's a way to do this or I will have to use the "Index Array" function to separa

  • Seeing my podcast in iTunes.

    I've successfully uploaded my podcast to iTunes but I when uploaded my second episode to libsyn, it's not showing up on my podcast page in the store. I subscribed to my podcast and can see the episode in my library, just not on the store page.