Why does out slapd process consume a lot of memory (1.1 GB)?

Our LDAP installation (4.1) on Solaris 5.8 consumes too much memory. It is now at 1.1 GB and rising. I have tuned the dbcachesize and cachesize parameters in the config file, but that has not helped.
I'd appreciate any help I can get in solving this problem. Also, I can't upgrade our installation due to other issues.

Which exact version are you using? There were some memory fixes in the service packs.

Similar Messages

Why are the following processes always using lots of memory?

Can someone tell me why the following processes are always using lots of memory and are always running?
kernel_task 280MB
java 300MB
clamd 120MB
mds 100MB
WindowServer 100MB
coreservicesd 60MB

Because they require that much memory and because the processes are always in use.
This is one reason why the minimum system memory requirement is 1 GB.
Now, you have one third-party process listed, clamd, which is used by ClamXAV anti-virus software. If you can uninstall it you will recover the memory needed by clamd.

Why does the snmpcoll process always start up even if SNMP Statistics Collection is turned off?

Why does the snmpcoll process always start up even if SNMP
Statistics Collection is turned off?
<P>
The SNMP Statistics Collection field on the Server Status|SNMP
Subagent Configuration form affects only the SNMP subagent, which is a separate entity from
the collector process (snmpcoll). Currently, snmpcoll does not look
at the SNMP configuration data when it starts up. It is started by
the dispatcher and terminates when the dispatcher terminates. Many
of the statistics are supposed to reflect cumulative values recorded since MTA
initialization, such as the total number of messages sent and received.
As a convenience, the collector process collects information in the
background even while the SNMP subagent is turned off; this way,
the values are available when the SNMP subagent is configured and
turned on.

Collections fall off on the Date of First Deliquency 7-7.5 years later; that is supposed to be reported as the first time you went late (1-30 days) on the OC (original creditor) in the chain of events leading up to it's being farmed out for collection as I underestand it. DOFD though sometimes doesn't get reported right, and by default it will be the date the collection is added to the bureaus. As an example I have an awkward collection (not sure how I got it looking at the payment history thought I'd cancelled that account but TWC billing apparently didn't think so) which I went late on in 2009, but didn't get farmed out till late 2010. The DOFD is 6/09 looking at it, and it's expected to come off according to the bureaus 6/16 as a result. Different negatives have their own rules though.

Why does my iPod touch take a lot of time to update and download apps? I got the one of the fastest wifi

Why does my iPod touch take a lot of time to update and download apps? I got the one of the fastest wifi

Try this:
Close all apps in the Task Bar. Double-click the Home button and hold apps down for a second or two. Tap the minus sign to close app.

Quicklook consumes a lot of memory on column view previewing large files

After upgrading to Mountain Lion, everytime I click on a large file (like a disk image, DMG, ISO) on finder's column view, it starts spinning the icon and quicklookd consumes a lot of memory even causing other apps to swap to disk. After the preview icon is done, the quicklookd memory is dealocated.
This do not happen on Lion.

Just found out that a plugin (QLStephen - http://whomwah.github.com/qlstephen/) was causing the problem.
Removed it from /Library/Quicklook, restarted quicklook (qlmanage -r) and the problem is gone.

Why does my iMac only have 1 GB of memory? I hardly have anything on here. I cannot download software update in order to get Turbo Tax to work.

Why does my iMac only have 1 GB of memory?

Put in more RAM. Visit OWC, DataMem, or Crucial.com to purchase memory for your model. You computer would have more memory had you put more in a long time ago.

Sessions that consume a lot of Memory

Hi,
How to retrieve sessions that consume a lot of Memory (Database 11.2.0.2) ?
Regards,

791550 wrote:
Hi,
How to retrieve sessions that consume a lot of Memory (Database 11.2.0.2) ?
Regards,Hi. You can query v$sesstat,v$statname and can join with v$session then you will get which session consume how much memory like below query
select
        username,
        sess.sid,
        value,
        name
from v$sesstat sst,
        v$statname sn,
        v$session sess
where sst.statistic#=sn.statistic# and
sess.sid=sst.sid and
username is not null and
upper(sn.name) like '%MEMORY%'
order by username

Why does my ipod cannot sync 20 GB of memory if it is 32 GB ipod?

why does my ipod cannot sync 20 GB of memory if it is 32 GB ipod?

The message is saying that it needs 5 GB more GB that what is available on the iPod.
How many GB are free before you sync?

Why Firefox 5.0 Still Consumes A Lot Of RAM?

Contrary to many statements that Firefox 5.0 is RAM optimized and uses less, i still have Firefox eating '''[http://i.stack.imgur.com/i1AgT.png almost ~800MB of RAM and mapping more]'''.
I used command:
''about:memory''
And was presented with a modules/extension tree and i don't understand what each means. Does anybody here have experience or knowledge about this here who could tell me where may be the problem?

Have you any particular reason for using an older version of Firefox.
Whilst I rarely use firefox 3.6 now, and do not know the answer I will comment that the now unsupported firefox 4 did have bad memory problems in some cases. Some of those problems were addressed in firefox 5, and others are addressed in Firefox 7, which is due out on the Aurora channel next week.
You could consider upgrading to a newer version of firefox. If you need firefox3.6 only for limited use you could consider using Firefox portable, alongside a newer version of Firefox.
* portable: http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable/localization#legacy36
* see also
**[[installing a previous version of firefox]]
**[[high memory usage]]
**[[firefox consumes a lot of CPU resources]]

Query to find out which process consuming more cpu?

Hi All,
some one please tell me the query to find out which process is consuming more
cpu resources?
Thanks and Regards
Srikanth

Use V$SESSTAT to determine which sessions are using most CPU, and investigate what SQL these users/sessions are executing:
SQL> select ss.sid, se.command, ss.value CPU, se.username, se.program
from v$sesstat ss, v$session se
where ss.statistic# in
(select statistic#
from v$statname
where name = 'CPU used by this session')
and se.sid=ss.sid
order by ss.value desc;

Why does Firefox 4 (4.0.1 specifically) leak memory?

'''Answer:''' I figured it out.
History lesson first. Ever since the 4.0.1 update, Firefox 4 has been crashing A LOT. It's gotten so bad that FF4.0.1 will eat memory with no end in sight and eventually Windows (Win 7 64-bit) forcefully close the program due to an out of memory error.
I have 8 GB of RAM installed. And, it would crash once it exceeds 1.5 GB of RAM used by Firefox 4. I've seen Firefox 4 go up to 1.85 GB of RAM in Task Manager. This is with 20 tabs open.
With the add-on Leak-Monitor, I've narrowed down the issue. Having only Leak-Monitor as the extension installed, all pop-ups point to how '''poorly Firefox 4 handles Javascript'''!
MSNBC Leak Monitor issue:
[http://www.octoberasian.com/tech/text/FF4-Leak-Monitor_MSNBC.txt Leak Monitor log from MSNBC.com]
I've gotten more pop-ups from even support.mozilla.com because of the Javascript on this website.
Firefox 4.0.1 is leaking memory from every Javascript on every website I load. It's leaking memory as we speak with only this page loaded (one tab).
FIX IT! Firefox 4 is poorly handling Javascript, especially when multiple tabs are opened.

octoberasian: I, too, am experiencing this phenomenon. I shut my system down, pulled the EIC cable, held down the power button - then replugged and rebooted. I closed down every unneeded application that I have set to auto-start. Finally, I opened a single Firefox 4.0.1 window and let it sit. It began with consuming 43 Mb of memory. By afternoon - about 5 hours later - it was up to 203 Mb. There is definitely something very wrong with this version. It does the same on all the machines we have, sans our server. We don't use the server for anything but being a server & it has some version of Firefox 3 on it anyway. No Java Scripts were running, nor were any Adobe ARM or any plugins. I noticed when plugins run - the memory leakage goes into overdrive. Hey, I'm just sayin'...

Why does LabVIEW sometimes hang when DLL loads into memory?

I'm calling a third party DLL from LabVIEW 2010. LV occassionally hangs (Not Responding) when either loading the DLL into memory or when closing my main VI. When it doesn't hang, it communicates with the DLL seamlessly. When I try to build an Application (exe), LV always hangs during the build at the point that it is saving the main VI (the scroll on the builder moves until it says "Saving main.vi"). Any insight into what needs to be done to the DLL (or VI) to resolve this issue?

What does the DLL do? One cause of this could be to try to load/unload other DLLs in PROCESS_ATTACH or PROCESS_DETACH of DLLMain. Microsoft has in many places said that doing this is highly unsafe and asking for all kinds of troubles, since the DLL loading is not fully reentrant.
Another possibility would be incorporation of ActiveX components that use some form of RPC mechanisme to communicate with out of process ActiveX/OLE components. The necessary RPC proxy hooks into the calling processes message loop and that is a delicate piece of code in LabVIEW. Even when the DLL does not use ActiveX itself, it might employ some message hooking on its own and mess up things in a way that Windows and/or LabVIEW get confused.
Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Netherlands
a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

SQL Developer consumes a lot of memory

Sql developer consumes a lot of RAM (around 100 MB) few minutes after start of application . any tips to reduce this?

This is usually due to the caching of database objects on support of code insight and is dependent on the number of objects in the database. As documented in the readme.txt in the sqldeveloper home directory, you can disable code insight.
2.1 To disable Code Insight
Run SQL Developer from a command line using the following statement:
Windows : sqldeveloper -J-Dsdev.insight=false
Linux or Mac: Run sh sqldeveloper -J-Dsdev.insight=false
or edit sqldeveloper.conf and add "AddVMOption -J-Dsdev.insight=false"

Webutil_file_transfer consuming a lot of memory and doesn't release...

I'm facing a problem with webutil_file_transfer.client_to_as_with_progress when I'm transferring many files from the client to the server. Suddenly webutil stops the transferring and webutil doesn't work until I've restarted the form.
I've noticed that the frmweb.exe process is increasing it's memory usage while traferring the files. When it reaches about 90-100mb memory in use - webutil "explodes".
It looks like webutil doesn't relase the ressources after the file has been transferred to the server.

I've found a workaround to this "bug".
Instead of calling webutil_file_transfer..... directly in the code - I open a new form with call_form, activates a timer in the when_new_form_instance trigger - which makes the call to webutil_file_transfer - and then closes the form.
Now webutil is releasing the ressources, because the form which made the webutil-call i closed after each call.

Why does File- Export process jpgs where I have made no changes?

Hi, I'm new to Lightroom. I would like to make LR my photo management software of choice for managing my huge personal collection of photographs. I've flagged keepers and tagged photos accordingly: Food, people names, etc.
What I would like to do now is find all photos marked with the tag "JapanVacation2009" and export them to disk so I can bring them to a friend's house and share them. When I click File->Export, I see that even though I've make tone and exposure changes to less than 1% of my my photos, LR reprocesses every photo!
What I want is that for photos where I have made some kind of change, yes, please process and create the new version of the photo. For photos where I have made no change except for adding tags, please, please, just copy the file into the export directory!!! It's faster AND I really didn't want my photos reprocessed.
I am sitting here waiting for these files to be exported (reprocessed)-- this is taking forever! I generally take my photos in jpg because I'm really going to make very few changes to my photos-- I know that I could take them in RAW, but I find this inconvenient for my workflow.
Please help. If I can't find a resolution, I'm going to have to investigate something like Picasa.
LR gurus, what do I do???

Folders are irrelevant to LR as an organisational tool. LR will search, create collections or smart collections based on whatever criteria you set.It is a very quick and effective organisational tool once you have learnt how to use it.
When exporting from LR to a lossy format such as a jpg if the file is already compressed and you re compress it then this will result in further loss of quality. That is always the case when using JPGs. If you export at 100% ( no further compression) then no loss of quality will occur due to compression, but obviously re processing a processed 8 bit format such as a JPG will always result in some quality loss. If you have made no changes to the original JPG in LR and then export it at 100% then LR just produces a copy of the original and no loss of quality will occur. JPG should really be treated as a finished format and no further processing applied. If you wish to process your images then retain the RAW file, or if scanning, scan to a 16 bit file such as TIFF to minimise any quality loss as a result of processing.
Exporting times are very quick from LR as long as your machine is well set up and has enough RAM. 600 images with few changes dependent on the size of the image would only usually take a few minutes to export to a disk dependent on the speed of the disk. Obviously if you are exporting to a slow hard drive, to things like DVD's and CD's, have little RAM or lots of other applications running in the background this can slow things down, there are lots of tips around here and elsewhere on how to set up your computer to get the best out of LR.

Why does out slapd process consume a lot of memory (1.1 GB)?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for