Why does TestStand take so much longer to load a Vi from a LabVIEW prject than calling directly?

I have done some tests where the same VI loaded from a LabVIEW project takes much much longer to load in TestStand vs calling the VI directly. The project file I'm using is large, and am guessing it tries to load all the files in the project into memory?? Any ideas on how to fix this? I would like to continue calling VI's using projects in TS but the load time can be ridiculous. Thanks

madmac wrote:
Set timing on.So did you read the rest of my reply, with respect to the buffer cache and physical IO?
That aside, if you utilize more useful tools to ascertain the performance of these queries and still have concerns....
When your query takes too long
When your query takes too long ...
How to Post a SQL statement tuning request
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
Cheers,

Similar Messages

FF opens ok but why does it take so very long to load my home page.I have new laptop,windows 7.

FF opens ok but why does it take so very long to load my home page.I have new laptop,windows 7. Can anyone suggest a solution please.
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== yesterday for no apparent reason.

I had this problem once before, And now again.
The only thing I did different, was Instead of shutting down my computer, I click on Log off User.
Ever since then I have noticed windows XP is taking longer to load, and so is Firefox.
Hope this clue helps.
-V-

Why does it take so much longer for applications to launch under lion as compared to snow leopard

I have two iMacs one which cannot run Lion and one which does.
Launching applicaitons under Lion takes a measurable amount of time longer to launch under Lion than they do under Snow Leopard.
The Lion machine is newer, faster and larger than the Snow Leopard machine - 4 cores vs 2, however, every time I launch an application, such as Safari or Text Exit as two examples, the Lion machine just cranks and cranks (you can listen to the disk drive).
Text edit is particularly rediculous. If I try to open a text file, either for the first time or one which has been opened by text edit before, I am greeted with the sound of the disk drive and the spinning beach ball.
All hardware diagnostic tests pass with flying colors. Or so it appears as no errors or abnormalities are reported.
This effect has been in place since the lion machine arrived (which was "factory installed" with Snow Leopard and then upgraded over the net to Lion).

That is not normal, but what is going on is hard to say without some testing. It could be cache-related, if you've gotten some corruption in some important caches. Try getting a copy of OnyX and clearing caches. (Note that cache clearing should be considered a troubleshooting step only... don't use such utilities for routine maintenance.)
You could also have a dying hard drive. That would not necessarily show up on hardware tests. Sometimes drive failures show up in advance in hardware tests or SMART status checks, and sometimes they don't. That could explain the excessive hard drive thrashing. If this is the problem, there may not be any reasonable solution until the drive finally goes kaput, or decides to change to a detectable imminent failure.
There could also be any number of other problems, such as low RAM, hard drive directory corruption, incompatible third-party software, etc. Try some of the techniques in the Mac OS X Speed FAQ.

Why does exporting take so much longer than in FCP7?

With the same computer configuration I am getting three times the rendering time with I go to either the projectings settings defualt or h.264. Nothing had been background rendered but it was never in FCP7 either. It seems like any text or other overlayed graphics are really slowing this process down. Thoughts?

That is not normal, but what is going on is hard to say without some testing. It could be cache-related, if you've gotten some corruption in some important caches. Try getting a copy of OnyX and clearing caches. (Note that cache clearing should be considered a troubleshooting step only... don't use such utilities for routine maintenance.)
You could also have a dying hard drive. That would not necessarily show up on hardware tests. Sometimes drive failures show up in advance in hardware tests or SMART status checks, and sometimes they don't. That could explain the excessive hard drive thrashing. If this is the problem, there may not be any reasonable solution until the drive finally goes kaput, or decides to change to a detectable imminent failure.
There could also be any number of other problems, such as low RAM, hard drive directory corruption, incompatible third-party software, etc. Try some of the techniques in the Mac OS X Speed FAQ.

Why does it take me so long time to migrate from my old Mac

Why does it take me so long time to migrate from my old Mac?
I just bought a new MacBook Air and using an ethernet cable to migrate all material from my old MacBook Pro, it has now taken med 4 days
and still not done? What am I doing wrong?

Thanks for that gbrenik.
Don't really wanna start reloading all of Lion, but read somewhere that I should start the migration by restarting my source Mac by holding down T during startup, that would do the trick. Is this what I have done wrong?

Why does %system take so much of my system resources half an hour into computer turned on.

I recently inhereted an i7 8gb ram 256gb ssd retina 15" mbp from my father and I am trying to use it but it keeps malfunctioning.
The error:
Activity Monitor is set to launch at start-up so I kept track of the Activity of CPU, due to starting the troubleshooting of this error.
What I found was that when computer starts the CPU would be idle 95% and when the computer would be on for half an hour the %System would start to take all of the remaining idle cpu. Regardless of what I was doing, wether just leaving the computer and not doing anything, or playing Starcraft 2. Either way the %System just destroys the CPU about half-an-hour into start-up of MBP.
I have done a system restore (via turn comp on, hit command+r and do the online factory restore) twice.
I have switched user accounts because I was thinking it was something I did on this account. Still happened.
I have googled to see if anyone else has a problem like this but couldn't find an exact replica of the situation, just similar problems.
I have done Software Update and still nothing.
Side-note:
Computer was not used for 4 months, and when I first tried to use it it would not turn on. With or without charger connected.
I left it to charge over night and nothing. Packed the MBP away for a few days. Then tried again to turn it on via charging, nothing happened and about 5 minutes after trying for the first time (kept it plugging in without disconnecting) I noticed a minor cloud of smoking rising from the MBP out of the back, behind the monitor. I closed the monitor and the MBP turned on. Now when I move the MBP around I can hear "broken things" moving around in the MBP. Now the battery is shot and reads as being not present.
Not sure if the side-note has anything to do with the main error but thought I would add that in. If anyone can help me out I will be forever grateful of them.
Update: I read some other peoples "problems" on this forum and found that you can view "system processes" from the drop down menu in the top right corner of activity monitor. And kernal_task is taking 600% of CPU. And someone asked the original poster "did you launch anything at all that would affect the kernal_task" and he said no. Well Im in the same boat. I did system restore over-night. Went to log-in and noticed the usual... 30 seconds login with half a second delay with keystrokes. (mind you this is the first time using after computer did restore. All it did was sit idle, and had a user log-in).
Also another thing I forgot to mention was that when I turn computer off and then turn it off (shut down. manual start-up) then the problem would reset. But if I did a "restart" then the computer would restart with the %system consuming all the resources as it did before.
Message was edited by: Violentce

If you believe the information shown for your product is incorrect, you can submit your proof of purchase online or by fax. Your sales receipt is needed for Apple's 1-year limited warranty and AppleCare Protection Plan validation, so be sure to keep it in a safe place. Apple's 1-year limited warranty is the same whether or not you register.
that was off of the page for checking warrenty.
so to get mountain lion i have to go into the store? there is no online downloading??

Why does "Other" take so much space on iPad vs. iPod touch?

When I plug the iPad into my iMac, I ownder why the Other category is so much larger than that for my Touch. The iPad is 32 GB, while the Touch is 16 GB. The are similary loaded with my music, photos and apps, but that Other thing is way much larger.
Any thoughts?

Found the answer in another thread. Went from 7.2 GB to 1.12 GB after restore and backup.

Why does it take a very long time for shows to post to VOD?

A lot of programs say they will be on demand the following day. This isn't true. Seems you have to wait a week or longer for shows to post. Why? Comcast would usually be by 4:00 PM the following day. When you miss something and want to catch up on it you have to wait, and then the next show is already being shown by the station. It's a pain. I know I can get a DVR but that costs more $$$. If you advertise your VOD to be current then be current.

Since the Verizon Forums are for users to help other users, I doubt you will get any definitive answer. We customers simply do not have access to any information on how Verizon handles VOD.
Justin
FiOS TV, 25/25 Internet, and Digital Voice user
QIP7232, QIP7100-P2, IMG 1.9.1
Keller, TX 76248

Why does it take Firefox several minutes to load all wesites including its own?

Opening Firefox may take minutes. Or if opens it takes minutes to access Google. Or if that opens minutes go by before the NYTimes site opens. Often a window from Firefox appears: "This is embarrassing." Three options appear: restart,check for errors, close program.

It sounds to me like the installation didn't perform correctly.
What I suggest you do is to go to Add/Remove Programs and uninstall it, but don't checkmark the option to remove your bookmarks, customizations etc.
Before you do that though, go to [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/fx/?ref=logo Download Firefox 4.0] and download a fresh installation file.
After you uninstall the existing installation, reboot.
It's also wise to disable your AV before installing again. If you've got AVG, this is particularly difficult because it doesn't have an Exit option. Instead, you have to open MSCONFIG and remove the checkmark from '''AVG Watchdog '''which disables everything. Any changes to MSCONFIG requires a reboot I regret to say.

Why does firefox take uo to 20sec to load on startup

when i switch on my pc and click onto open firefox it can take up to 20 secs to open, this has only occurred over the past 4 updates

Did you disable all the extensions before restarting?
If it works in Firefox Safe-mode then disable all extensions (Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) and then try to find which is causing it by enabling one extension at a time until the problem reappears.
Close and restart Firefox after each change via "File > Exit" (Mac: "Firefox > Quit"; Linux: "File > Quit")
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
In Firefox Safe mode these changes are effective:
*all extensions are disabled
*the default theme is used (no persona)
*userChrome.css and userContent.css are ignored
*the default toolbar layout is used (localstore-safe.rdf)
*the Javascript JIT compiler is disabled
*hardware acceleration is disabled
*plugins are not affected
*preferences are not affected

Why does it take. So much longer for YouTube videos to load on my iPad 1st gen. then on my iPod touch?

Why does it take so much longer for YouTube videos to load on my 1st gen. iPad then on my iPod touch or my laptop?

This is not the place to make a point. This is a user to user support forum. I do not need instructions about the use and care or alleged failure of cables. At no time did I ever say or imply that you were an idiot, that is your statement and words, not mine. Take the time to Google and you will find instances where there have been injuries and death dealing with 3rd party cables and chargers. The abilities that Apple has for manufacturing and what business decisions they make in creating their products is nothing more than speculation, and that is not allowed under the terms of the forum that you agreed on when you joined here. If you want to rant at Apple, then use the feedback link, www.apple.com/feedback. Other users cannot do anything for you.

With track locking why does it take longer to --

1.) With track locking, why does it say so much longer to "Save As" and to create bakcup copies of songs?
2.) If after I lock tracks to improve performance can I unlock them for the purpose of faster "Save As" and copies?

I found from my experience that if one deletes the freeze files to save space but does not unlock the tracks GB will not search for the files upon opening but rather will recreate the locked tracks after you click "Play".
I just wanted to clarify that. I didn't want anyone to think GB will open a tune and then begin a search right away. It won't happen until you click play.
Heres my reasoning for leaving the tracks locked and deleting the freeze tracks and not unlocking them before hand.
If I leave the tracks locked and then delete the files I don't have to remember later which tracks I wanted locked and which ones I did not want locked. All I need to do is open the file and click play. Its actually more convenient. If you unlock the tracks first then delete the files you have to go back later and relock the ones you wanted. TO me thats a much easier way to remember things.
I agree with you whole heartily when it comes to "Save As Archive". Its the only way to save.
"Save" And "Save As" only creates a pointer to your files in and from the "Project Data" file. They do not add AIFF files taken from GB browser to the "Media" folder. Only a recorded instrument (vocal or instrument) or a file dropped into time line are saved in the media folder using "Save" or "Save As". Or in other words anything from "Outside" the GB browser.
MIDI instruments recorded into GB are not kept in the Media folder after a "Save" or Save As" or unfortunately "Save As Archive".
"Save as Archive" saves all the files you currently have in the GB timeline (except MIDI data) in the Media Folder. A nice, safe, sure way to know all your intended files will be there when you open your tune or burn it to a disc and return it in the future. This is why I always use it. It does of course make you .band file much larger.
Recently I have tested the .band files for operator usefulness and error to try to alleviate the somewhat unfounded fears placed upon opening the file with the "Show Package Contents" function.
Sure thing can go wrong if your careless when you open the .band file but its not as is clicking any of the audio file will hurt anything.
You can play many of these files saved under "Save as Archive" with the finder.
I have found that if you ACCIDENTLY toss out any AIFF files that were taken from the GB browser and placed into the timeline that this will not hinder your .band file from opening. GB will still open and play your file as it normally would and when you "Save As Archive " again those browser files will be replaced in the media folder. Even if you have looped them, cut them, shortened them.
If you ACCIDENTLY toss out a file added to the timeline or a recorded instrument or vocal then your in trouble because it is gone but the GB file will still open. GB will tell you it can't find the file and ask if you want to search for it.
Now if you Toss out your "Project FIle" then your screwed. The .band file will not open and the game is over.
Why do I even mention all this? Not to annoy anyone or go to battle over the subject but simply to mention that I have tested every scenario and that opening the .band file and clicking around will not harm a thing. Clicking around will not harm anything or damage your file. Just leave the "Project Data" file alone.

Why does Sync take soo long?

I am trying to sync up a website on a new install of
Dreamweaver. The total volume of the entire website is just a
little over 100 MB. At DSL speed, I could simply download the
entire site with an FTP program like CuteFTP and it would come down
completely in about 30-40 minutes.
Dreamweaver has been chugging along for 12 hours now and I
haven't a clue when it will be finished if ever. Many times when I
check it, there is a dialog that says something like a file xxx.htm
could not be downloaded from the server, Skip, Cancel, will
automatically skip in xx seconds.
I am not for sure why this message keeps popping up. Is this
why the download is taking so long?
I have seen long download times before and never noticed
those error messages before. I wish there was a setting to make it
skip all files with errors.
Why does Dreamweaver take exponentially longer than Cute FTP
to synchronize my files?
Kirk

Adobe's FTP code in DW is sorely lacking. I too found it
painfully slow. I
have since gone to a dedicated FTP program and live much
happier.
"kirkdickinson" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:fnocjd$8pk$[email protected]..
> Still unanswered. Bump

Why does Firefox take so long to load beta images on some sites?

I upgraded to one of the latest versions of Firefox, and it's better in some ways. It loads much faster than previous versions, but when I try to look at certain websites - the Globe and Mail is one of them - I get messages like "waiting for beta images" and Firefox just sits there and I can't look at the site. Why does Firefox take so long to upload beta images? I don't have that problem with Internet Explorer.

Hi,
Please also try after clearing the cache and cookies: '''Tools '''('''Alt '''+ '''T''') > '''Clear Recent History''', choose '''Everything '''in '''Time range to clear''', '''Cookies '''and '''Cache '''in '''Details '''and '''Clear Now'''. If the problem persists please check in [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe%20Mode Safe Mode].
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problematic_extensions Problematic Extensions]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Troubleshooting%20extensions%20and%20themes Troubleshooting Extensions and Themes]
[http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Uninstalling+add-ons Uninstalling Add-ons]
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_toolbars Uninstalling Toolbars]
Safe mode disables the installed '''Extensions''', and themes ('''Appearance''') in '''Tools''' ('''Alt''' + '''T''') > '''Add-ons'''. Hardware acceleration is also temporarily disabled - the manual setting is '''Tools''' > '''Options''' > '''Advanced''' > '''General''' > '''Use hardware acceleration when available'''. [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Options%20window%20-%20Advanced%20panel?as=u Options > Advanced]. All these settings/add-ons can also be individually or collectively disabled/enabled/changed in Firefox normal mode to check if an extension, theme or hardware acceleration is causing issues.

Why does it take so long to download a saved movie from the cloud

Why does it take so long to download a saved movie from the cloud

Hi first off if your running fcp 7 with compressor 3.5 and fcp x and compressor 4 on the same drive you may run into problems
as you now have a mix up between Qmasters which caused me lots of problems when i did any back ground Rendering via compressor of FCP-X
i had to completly remove compressor 3.5 and compressor 4 then put compressor 4 back on again as the shared rendering out of FCP-X seems to loose the plot with both versions on the same on the same drive there is an app
Here
http://www.digitalrebellion.com/fcsremover/
which you can get allows you to get rid of certain bits of FCS and FCP-X correctly as you may know deleting the app is,nt the whole story as you need to remove the pref etc as well
but its really clearing out every thing to do with qmaster thats is the thing here thats what causes all the issues
really you should follow apple install instructions for FCP -X install ( and put it on separate volumes ) and i know they say there is a way to get every thing working on the same drive ...but it did,nt work for me like you i had massive render times and that 3x crash error
any way
once i had remove done my remove C3.5 ,C4 and reinstall C4 only it worked straight away from FCP-X using all the cores on my machine
get some thing like istats or run activity monitor to make sure Fcp-x is using all your cores to render and you can actually see if its doing anything at all instead of waiting 5 hours for an error
if you want to use multi core in compressor 4 you have to go into the new apple qmaster tab and setup up a quick cluster etc
On another note i alway use Optimized media when doing the import as while you editing its back ground render every thing into pro res making it a much nice codec to compress down to H264 which you need for the ATV
i hope that helps a bit ,some else may have a better solution but worked for me
thanks
G

Why does TestStand take so much longer to load a Vi from a LabVIEW prject than calling directly?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for