Why Eclipse and not Dreamweaver?

How come you're only supporting the Eclipse environment and
not Dreamweaver?

quote:
Originally posted by:
mcantrell
lacking features out of the box..
Eclipse and lacking out-of-the-box features? Have you ever
worked with smth but brilliant IntelliJ IDEA? How about Visual
Studio, is it cool, fast and full of features? 2005th version still
has no any refactoring features :)
Eclipse is the second best IDE to my mind and absolutely
unreachable among platforms. Dreamweaver-based Flex is as slow and
buggy as Eclipse 2.x and has no features at all...

Similar Messages

  • Why Siebel and not any other CRM

    What all members have to say: Why Siebel and not any other CRM?
    Message was edited by:
    War

    What are you looking for?
    I hope it's not related to your nick. ;-)
    Seriously, there is no set of rules that makes you decide for or against Siebel.
    If Siebel is a good solution for one company, doesn't mean it's a good solution for all companies.
    It all depends...

  • Why 512mb and not 1

    Why will my computer only recognize the Zen Nano Plus 52mb mp3 player and not the gig model? Have tried everything. Even updating the firmware on the gig, but it never becomes recognized properly. Anyone?

    I have the same problem as Cadman. See his message of 2/25/05 for full history. Is there anyone here that can help!!
    I just got the Zen Nano Plus gig for Christmas. i am having the exact same problem. I also downloaded the new drivers, but did no good. It will recognize my unit as a nano when i plugg it in, but when i go to the control panel under hardware, it says it in "UnSupported" I have tried everything. Did the sane as cadman. I removed all software and started all over again. There has to be an answer. i am somewhat PC savy, but this one has me!
    I forgot to mention, when i load the software i get this message that "Moti've Monitor Service has encountered a problem and needs to close" and then i get the MS message that it closed and if i want to send MS the message. Not sure if that means anything.
    Nepsa
    Nepsa

  • Why VPLS and not L3 VPNs ???

    Hi all
    Please bare with me, i know a lot has been written about what VPLS is, I have read the postings, but maybe someone can in simple terms answer my qn for me;
    Why should one go for VPLS and not L3 VPNs or L3 VPNs and not VPLS, i need arguments from both the enterprise point and the ISP point
    Hope you get my Question
    Regards
    MM

    Well..
    VPLS:
    +No need to involve the ISP for routing issues
    +Support non-IP protocols - IPX, AppleTalk etc..
    -Difficult to troubleshoot
    -Possible to make a L2-loop
    -Customers could overflow mac-tables.
    L3-VPN:
    +ISP control the routing process - or the customer could control the CE-PE, and control it's own routing.
    +Loops are avoided with routing-protocols
    -Non-IP protocols have to be encapsulated to work
    Personally I liked the VPLS best before, but after choosing an ISP supporting PE-CE-protocols, not using static's and has a good support centre, I always recommend L3VPN's.
    Also within our own MPLS-network we always use L3. (with no 7600's VPLS is not supported...) EoMPLS is not used permanently used within out MPLS, but could be used for moving a customer from one datacenter to another, or other special timelimited purpose...
    L@rs

  • Why xkwert and not xkawrt

    I'm seeing example that use xkwert to the set the condition base value in a routine instead of xkawrt
    Can someone explain why xkawrt would not be used since kawrt is the condition base value in konv ?
    I thought xkwert is the actual condition value
    Thanks,
    Richard

    As an ABAPer, I usually carefully examine
    I cant believe that you are an ABAPer.  All these years the way in which you gave suggestions made to think that you are a strong domain consultant.  )
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Why SDK and not just JRE

    Hi,
    I am amazed that for just running a Java application one needs the Java SDK and not the runtime environment only.
    Has Oracle got shares with hard disk manufacturers ?
    Regards

    The reason to require a JDK or our bundled jre+tools.jar is for the plsql debugger. The debugger use the jdi apis which are not included in the stock jre. If you never intend on using the plsql debugger you can use a jre and everything else will run just fine.
    -kris

  • Why ITS and not WebDynpro

    Hello,
    I understand ITS was the first in the series to Web enable SAP Applications. Later BSP and now in 640 WebDynpro can be used to Web enable the SAP Applications.
    But why still ITS is retained? Does it have any advantages over BSP/Web Dynpro?
    In SRM-EBP,ITS is used & almost all transactions are Web Transactions.Why BSP/WebDynpro is not used to develop these transactions in SRM. Is there a specific reason to retain ITS-Web Transactions in SRM.
    Will it be retained in future SRM Releases or will ITS be replaced by BSP/WebDynpro is future releases.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Prasanna

    >
    Maria Graziano wrote:
    > Hey Thomas,
    >  
    >
    > I think we are experiencing a similar issue.
    >
    > We are using SAP GUI 7.10 and are trying to print cheques with smartforms using locl
    >
    > We need LOCL working as it is the preferred method for SmartForm printouts like the pay statement.  For groups like Payroll, they will want this to work.  Not using LOCL will make printing out of manual pay statements look bad.
    >
    > How should this be configured? and is it as simple as assigning LOCL to the users' default printer option?
    >
    > OR do they need to direct the pay statements to a particular printer... Just a bit confused
    >
    > Please advise
    > Maria
    Are you talking about printing from Web Dynpro ABAP?  If so, LOCL will not work.  There is no direct connect to the SAPGUI/Client in Web Dynpro.  You have to follow the same rules as when running in Batch - which means no LOCL printing.

  • Why comopressor and not DVD Dtudio Pro?

    I am curious, DVD Studio pro seems to do a good job on compressing a video file with good end results, why use compressor since many users are complaining of not as good quality after compression?
    I did a test with the same video file with the same compression settings in both, and I got a better image quality with DVD Studio Pro 4.0. I made the comparison by playing the two compressed video files side by side, also, the MPEG file size was smaller with the DVD Studio Pro.
    Is it mostly because of the batch processing by using Compressor?
    Any input on this?
    Sigi

    Provided you export directly from Final Cut Pro (File > Export > Using Compressor) or Export a QuickTime Movie with DVD Studio Pro Markers embedded, Compressor places an I-frame on every cut made in an FCP Timeline. It also places an I-frame at the start and end of every (video) transition applied.
    (In selecting DVD Studio Pro Markers at the time of export, the QT file contains Chapter makers, [manually placed] Compression Markers and Cut markers. This if regardless of whether the QT movie is self-contained or not.)
    DVD Studio Pro, on the other hand, does not recognize the Cut markers in a (properly exported) QuickTime Movie from FCP. It only recognizes Chapter and Compression Markers that you place manually.
    In case you're not aware, I-frames are the only frames in a GOP that contain complete images. The other frame types B (Between) and P (Predicted) refer to picture data from other frames to complete the image.
    I-frames at the right place make a world of difference and you always want a 'scene change' to start on an I-frame. (There is tons more to say about the subject, but I just don't have the time, sorry.)
    To see GOP's in action...
    Import your Compressor-encoded file into DVDSP and drop it into a Track.
    With the Track active, press Option-Right Arrow to jump from I-frame to I-frame. (Option-Left Arrow to jump to previous I-frame)
    If you exported DVD Studio Pro markers, you should jump in increments of 15 frames, except when there is a cut.
    If you do the above with your QT movie (encoding in DVDSP), you'll only jump by 15 frame increments.
    In your test, did you export your QT movie with DVD Studio Pro Markers? Or only Chapter Markers? Perhaps No Markers? Or did you compress a file without cuts?

  • Why Logic and not protools other than midi

    why have users chosen Logic over protools...not a debate but just a little feedback, Thanks.

    Not wishing to debate either. The following are my opinions based on having worked on both systems:
    - Logic's MIDI editing/arranging capabilities (and ease of access) far exceed those of PT. For me, PT's MIDI implementation is a welcome addition to more recent versions, but it's downright primitive compared to Logic, DP, Cubase, etc.
    - Many important MIDI manipulation functions can be carried out non-destructively and in real time, including velocity, gating, transposition, and delay.
    - Extensive notation capabilities that come close to those of dedicated notation programs such as Finale and Sibelius
    - Audio operations are, in some respects, much easier in Logic than PT. For example, if you have a 1-measure drum loop that you want to run down through an entire track, you need only to place the first instance of it in Logic's Arrange window. Turn loop on and voila, it's done. No copying/pasting required. I can think of other operations that, to me, are much more easily accomplished in Logic than PT but I'm trying to keep this reply brief.
    - Aliases of audio regions can be created, so changes to the original region are automatically reflected in all aliases (no sure if PT offers that).
    - Compatibility with a wide variety of audio file types with no file type conversion necessary.
    - User-definable key commands
    - Ability to group tracks in folders (to cut down on eye-clutter, and, to easily mute/solo groups of tracks). I know this can be accomplished with Groups in PT, but having worked on both systems, Logic's folders are more intuitive and easier to deal with.

  • Extensions is Installing under catogory called other and not Dreamweaver

    Hi
    I currently using Dreamweaver cc and extension manager cc .I installed an extension called EasyRotator Slider Builder but extension mager put the extension under a product called other and I cant see the extension in dreamweaver. Can you please let me know hoe to put this extension under dreamweaver
    Hope you guys can help.

    Hi Wynandpre,
    You will have to contact the Extension Developer to know if this is an intended behavior, extension developers are the one who define where does the extension shows up in Extension Manager or Dreamweaver.
    For this particular extension please contact the developer and ask the same question.
    Let me know if you need help in contacting this Extension Developer, will be happy to help.
    Thanks
    Mudit

  • Why java and not HTML....?

    Can neone please tell me Why we use Java Programming to develop sites .....instead of html which is easy to use. Is it just the matter of security...?

    That's like asking why use linoleum when we could use carpet instead.
    HTML is good for presentation of certain types of things. It also makes creating simple forms easy. But there are some types of UI's that, while you could likely create them with DHTML, they are very complex and probably a real pain to support. Nevermind that there are still browser inconsistencies to deal with.
    Java is a totally different tool. In fact Java can do a whole heck of a lot more than UI's. Java can even be used on the server to help generate HTML output.
    Java can work with HTML in various ways. Sometimes Java's the right tool, sometimes HTML is the right tool. Use the right tool.

  • Why  webdynpro and not BSP or JSP?

    Hi,
    Am new to webdynpro technology. i would like to know what are the benefits of webdynpro over BSP and if we are using java why cant we use JSP's and why should we go for a new concept called webdynpro?
    Regards,
    Rashmi.

    Hi Rashmi,
    first, welcome on SDN! About your question:
    if you get some experiene with WebDynpro, you'll see that as far as the UI is concerned, you'll be able to create quite smooth interfaces quite quickly.  Advantage Nr. 1
    The concept of having a "context" shared among different views also makes life easy if you want fast result without caring how to pass values. This "passing values" is a question of design in WebDynpro.
    In the end, WebDynpro is a programming model which is very much intended on creating UIs with a defined framework where the developer can add some cutom code, where UI and BusinessLogic are more or less hard seperated.
    Just try it. The concept it totally different from other frameworks where you are obliged to implement differen interfaces and declare the usage by providing a XML for example. It's a question of taste if one likes WebDynpro, for it is very strict in it's usage.
    Hope it helps
    Detlev
    PS: Please consider rewarding points for helpful answers on SDN. Thanks in advance!

  • Why substring and not subString?

    why is it that "substring" doesn't have a second capital S? every OTHER not-first word gets to be capitalized.

    this is just a programming practice you however could write a class with SUBSTRING in all caps. no compil;ation or runtime errors/

  • Photoshop to Flash Catalyst .... why png and not jpg?

    Hi,
    I've imported my artwork from a photoshop file and created my project.
    I'm amazed at how large the file has turned out.
    One reason I can see is that everything that has been imported into FC from Photoshop has been saved as a png file.
    For example I have a panning scroll panel image, which is 700k as a png and 150k as a jpg.
    So no competition to which I should use!
    Is there away to set the import correctly at the first stage rather than what I have to do now is resave all the assets as jpgs and in the project replace the images.  doh!
    Thanks,
    Nick

    I think the choice between jpgs and pngs is about image quality and Adobe decided to err on preserving quality vs. file size. They did not want people to import their PS file into FC and see jpg artifacts and blame FC for it. Flash Catalyst has some opmitization features that might help in the file size reductions. See: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flashcatalyst/cs/using/WSe0363cf428f0b465ffa9edb1273635cfd7-80 00.html
    Chris

  • Why weblogicREALM and not myrealm?

    Hello.
    If I use Borland Janeva to authenticate over CORBA/IIOP with WLS8.1sp2, I need
    to specify
    the realm as "weblogicREALM" rather than "myrealm". The latter is the name specified
    in the config.xml, so is this a bug?
    thanks
    Ewan

    "Ewan MacIntyre" <bea_news@N0schpam/BLARTtwacky.com> wrote:
    >
    "Ewan MacIntyre" <bea_news@N0schpam/BLARTtwacky.com> wrote:
    Hello.
    If I use Borland Janeva to authenticate over CORBA/IIOP with WLS8.1sp2,
    I need
    to specify
    the realm as "weblogicREALM" rather than "myrealm". The latter is the
    name specified
    in the config.xml, so is this a bug?
    thanks
    EwanObviously I meant weblogicDEFAULT.
    Ewan
    Hi Ewan,
    myrealm in config.xml is the Security Realm, and has nothing to do with the realm
    in your webapp.
    Carmen

Maybe you are looking for