Why Flash player performance is better than Player comes with Adobe air ?

I built an Adobe Air application that played Video and working awesome on PC. now when i tried to start working on Tablet Version, What I found is
1. When i played 1 MB video file from Local , Audio and Video are not in sync and very disturbing. (not able to play a file more tha 2 Mb)
I created only video player using OSMF in the app. there is nothing else that can hamper the performace.
2. When i played same video using Web based Flex Application. It works perfectly
3. I tried with StageWebView in Adobe air and Results are equivelent to Web Version.
I am using Adobe Air 3.1 which is shipped with Flash Player 11.1, Then where things went Wrong.
Why I can't get the same performance in Air App?
IS AIR THE RIGHT CHOICE TO BUILD MOBILE APP?
IS THAT POSSIBLE TO GET NATIVE PLAYER/WEB VERSION LIKE PERFOMANCE (OR CLOSED TO) USING ADOBE AIR?
In addition,
I tried to read about encoding and other white papers. But basic thing that troubled me is, If Web Version is fine then why Air is not able to give the same performance.
Hardware configuration : 1G processer,
OS : Android 4.0.3
Thank you in advance.

What games are you trying? Which browser do you use and have you tried an alternative browser to see if they are also impacted?

Similar Messages

HT4759 Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?

Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?

chewy cabeza wrote:
Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?
From your point of view and the framing of your question, Apple does indeed support WIndows better than Mac for the limited issue of iCloud.
chewy cabeza wrote:
...YET, Leopard and Snow Leopard are NOT iCloud compatible. How can that be justified? Obviously, Apple can make iCloud available to Snow Leopard, but disdains us...
Historically speaking, Apple has rarely gone backwards in its OS development. Once they have released a new OS with new technology, I can only think of one example of when they backtracked: They released TrueType technology in System 7 and then released System 6.0.8, which included TrueType technology for continuing System 6 users.
So it is part of their culture to move forward and not backwards. Other examples:
• Inclusion of the then novel SONY 3.5" disk drive in its release of the first Macintosh (and not the industry standard 5.25" drive); after its use in the Lisa and adoption for the Apple II series of computers.
• Elimination of the floppy drive completely in the release of the first iMac.
• Use of then novel AAC audio compression as "state of the art" compression for the iPod release in 2001 instead of the outdated mp3 standard.
• Refusal to allow use of FLASH in iPod Touch/iPhone/iPads.
How could they justify these decisions? The marketplace justified them for Apple!
So, yes, they could release 10.6.9 with iCloud support. But why now, if not then?

Is the apple laptop with 4gb ram and i5 better than other laptop with 6gb ram and i5

is the apple laptop with 4gb ram and i5 better than other laptop with 6gb ram and i5

Well it depends on the age. http://www.everymac.com/ should help you identify the age of the two models.
Apple may use two processors called i5, but newer models have different optimizations than older models.
The processor is usually not the main affect on speed. RAM helps, but barely unless everything is on an SSD already. Hard drive speed is usually the limiting factor of speed on computers. eSATA hard drives with higher RPM can often yield the fastest results because notebook hard drives tend to be slower that are not SSD, but for those you need either Express/34 or Thunderbolt based adapters.

Are there more DVD menu other than what comes with Premiere Elements 13

are there more DVD menu other than what comes with Premiere Elements 13, anyone Please

how many systems
I just answered this question in a duplicate that you posted.
how many systems can I download my adobe premiere 13 on,
Duplicated posts tend to be confusing for the person originating the question as well as those trying to reply.
Typically a moderator closes or deletes one of the duplicates when it is seen.
So, please continue the discussion on this topic in your other thread whose link is shown above.
Thank you.
ATR

Why is WAP54G RPT MODE better than WRE54G?

Hello,
I have a project to expand a wireless network to another building with two floors. The proximity is close (literally only 15 feet between the walls), but only clients with great antennas/wifi cards would be able to reach the router in the main building, so I want to expand the wireless signal into the new building. The new building is two floors high, has no dropped ceiling or other ceiling/wall access, there is no conduit available between buildings, and no feasible way to run a wire, so my only real choice is to expand the signal coverage from the main building to the new building via wifi. I have read many posts on many different forums covering this topic. I understand that having multiple WRE54G repeaters has created reliability issues for some people. Too bad, because these are nice, discrete little units and would be ideal for what I need to do. I have seen several people recommend WAP54G units in repeater mode (no hardwired connection to the main router) in place of WRE54G units. What is the difference? Are they technically doing the same thing, and do you lose bandwidth by half with either unit? Is it just that the WAP54G has been more reliable? Not that bandwidth is my most important concern, reliability is my main concern, but I do have to deal with the issue of mounting these high on interior walls. Does the WRE54G v3 exhibit the same problematic issues that previous versions 1 and 2 did? I have a WRE54G v3 that I installed, and upgraded the firmware. I have to admit, setting it up with a WRT54G was problematic, but once it was set up, it hasn't lost its link since (just going on one week now). I do not have WEP enabled yet, I'm just using MAC address filtering from the WRT54G. My proposed configuration is:
WAP54G in main building, just inside the outer wall.
WRE54G in the 2nd building on the first floor.
WRE54G in the 2nd building on the second floor.
Both WRE54G devices would directly connect to the WAP54G, one would not connect through another. Does anyone see any potential problems? Also, we have an extra WRT300N that was donated that we were just going to use as a WAP by deconflicting the IP with the router and turning off DHCP. Any problems using the WRE54G with the WRT300N?
Thanks in advance to all that reply for your experience and insight.

Thanks again for your response. It is not practical to run an Ethernet cable from building one to building two, that's why I'm finding this to be a little extra complicated. The conduit situation is a total mess and they left no pull-throughs. Outdoor routing is not an option either. Thanks for your comment on the umbrella coverage characteristic, I had not heard that before but that will definitely be taken into consideration with our placement of the client-specific WAP. It's not a simple two-story building - the first floor is longer than the second floor, and the extra large space on the first floor is at one end and is where most of the WAP clients will be located. We'll be doing a lot of testing.
After performing more exhaustive research on these devices, I have decided to use the entry-level small business line - like a WAP54GP - because I need to have reliable wireless bridging between buildings one and two. However, everything I've read about units in this category shows that the N+gr model WG 102 has the same capabilities and performs noticeably better, especially at extended range. It's just a little more difficult to configure, but most people are very impressed with it. I purchased a WAP54GP anyway for testing purposes and will be able to compare the two in actual use.

5530 software performance is better than 5800?

Guys,
I'm a 5800XM user and and i found recently some of the feature of new released 5530XM is even better than 5800.
1. no kinetic scrolling in 5800. Really unhappy with this, Scrololing in 5800 is quite inconvenient, the V11 firmware is worst. Why there is no kinetic scrolling in 5800?
2. camera image quality. 3.2MP camera with carl zeis len, dual flash. Image quality i not comparable with 5530. 5800 image quality is really bad for me. The image capture is like a bit blue'ish. I wash an video on youtube, the image capture by 5530 camera is really much more better than 5800, it's quality is very good.
OMG, i'm sad with this. Can anyone tell me what is the reason of this? Nokia's developer, any problem with the firmware or it is a hardware problem. 5800XM cost higher than 5530XM.

Gary Scotland wrote:
or Bean freeware also
With the following limitations (for Word Users)

ACR 3.7 works better than 4.2 with RAW NEF - Why?

I've got CS3 with ACR 4.2 on my Mac. When I open RAW camera files in ACR 4.2 they end up desaturated. The reds in particular have mostly disappeared, but all the colors are annoyingly pale and wan. I then have to punch up the saturation, and often go into Camera Calibration to reinstate colors that have gone.
If I take the same images to my PC and open in CS2 via ACR3.7, the images have proper color saturation. I've checked the preference settings and they don't seem to be any different. And no, I'm not using the NEF plug-in on CS2 (which isn't available for CS3).
So why do my images end up so much better via 3.7 than via 4.2? Anyone got a theory? Is it because the default camera calibration in 4.2 is narrower than 3.7? I'm shooting with a Nikon D80 and a D200.

Tony, Tony, Tony
 
 Got your four images.
 
 First, there's the issue of the one you
erroneously claim to have converted in ACR 3.7 on your PC, especially since the metadata reveals it to be a NIKON SOFTWARE conversion and it has a NIKON profile embedded (Nikon sRGB 4.0.0.3001) as does the one specifically named Nikon View NX.JPG, yet the ones converted in ACR have sRGB IEC61966-2.1. embedded.
 
 The truth is that that image was NOT converted in ACR 3.7 at all.
 
 There can only be two reasons for that egregious error:
 
 1. you are being disingenuous, which I do not want to believe; or
 
 
2. you had the Nikon plug-in installed on your PC, which overrides ACR, and you were using the Nikon plug-in all the time without realizing it. Even though you thought you were using ACR, you were using the Nikon software all the time in Photoshop CS2.
 
 That has happened to many, many Nikon users. The Nikon plug-in sort of looks like ACR with a "simplified" interface, as users have described it. Nikon software installs that plug-in behind your back.
 
 In any event, without the RAW image as I've been suggesting from the beginning, all I can tell you is that your images look a lot more natural to me in the ACR conversion, and the oversaturated two developed in Nikon View NX (again no Raw Converter metadata) are within the parameters I would expect.
 
 c
<a href="http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1JtzFpfaH0PbDPPUd3skXfpZuxP2Rg1" /></a>
<img alt="Picture hosted by Pixentral" src="http://www.pixentral.com/hosted/1JtzFpfaH0PbDPPUd3skXfpZuxP2Rg1_thumb.jpg" border="0" />
 
 
 c
<a href="http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1WIr6Milnyj71JfyFEz2SB3ilq072" /></a>
<img alt="Picture hosted by Pixentral" src="http://www.pixentral.com/hosted/1WIr6Milnyj71JfyFEz2SB3ilq072_thumb.jpg" border="0" />
 
 
 In short, Tony, you are NOT seeing a difference between two different versions of ACR (as the title of this thread suggests) but ONLY between "the over-saturated, over-contrasty and over-sharpened images that appeal to most amateurs generated by the camera manufacturer's software", as I've been saying all along, and ACR's more natural rendition. Noise is also hidden by compressing the shadows so you don't see much of the noise inherent in the image.
 
 Adobe Camera Raw, ACR, on the other hand, comes with default settings designed to give you the most detail possible (even if this sometimes means revealing some of the noise hidden by the camera manufacturers in their RAW conversion software), as well as the most natural images.
 
 That being said, you can calibrate your camera to ACR and come up with your own settings to produce exactly what you want, including the JPEG-look of the camera manufacturer, and save that as your profile.
 
 The key is to learn how to use ACR properly and to calibrate your camera to ACR.
 
 
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Real-World-Camera-Raw-/dp/0321334094/sr=8-1/qid=1156891468/re f=pd_bbs_1/104-7285664-9941543?ie=UTF8" style="padding: 4px; background-color: #00caff; color: #eeeeee; font: bold 10px Verdana, san serif;" target="_blank">CLICK HERE</a> for some essential reading. [Get the rervised version for CS3 by Jeff Schewe coming out soon.]
 
 The ACR defaults are nothing more than a suggested starting point.
 
 The color temperature won't necessarily match either.

Why is MME playing much better than ASIO4ALL

I have a 64 bit acer Aspire R7 with 8GB RAM and runing windows 8.1. i have bin using adobe audition(now using CS6) for about 10 years now and i have never found myself havin this problem:
1)It so happens that my MME drivers are giving less glitches than the ASIO4ALL.(no matter how much i play around with the buffer size)
2)when using the asio4all during play back,the volume is lower compared to that of the MME drivers.
3)the asio4all icon on the system tray keeps flickering from play(green) to an exclamation mark(red) constantly
i cant use my MME for my projects coz i gat quite a bunch of plugins waiting to join the party...hence it will start glitching too sooner than later(((pliz help!!!help help help!!!!

I'm usin the onboard soundcard.i know have to get an external USB soundcard(guilty)...money issues.((but the thing is i used to run the same version of audition on a much smaller laptop(hp,32 bit,3GB RAM) and it worked far much better than the acer.when i play audio in audition with plugin effects:MME used to lag while ASIO4ALL would play it smoothly.n now i have rather the opposite situation.
ryclark wrote:
What audio interface are you using with Audition? If you are using the onboard soundcard you would be much better off using an external USB connected one with proper ASIO drivers which bypass the operating system completely.
There should be no difference between using ASIO4All and MME drivers since ASIO4All uses the windows drivers anyway. It converts them to ASIO for audio interfaces that don't have ASIO drivers. However from what I hear Win 8.1 may be causing the problem with your glitchy audio especially if you are using the built in audio
What do you mean there is no difference between ASIO4ALL and MME drivers?then why does audition prompt to use ASIO4ALL if available??

Using AC adapter to charge is better than charge it with USB cable?

I've been reading this on http://www.ipodbatteryfaq.com/
"When possible, always use the AC adapter (or vehicle adapter) for extended charging, not a FireWire cable attached to a computer."
The artical does not explain why, but I'm curious about it.
So, does charging iPod with USB cable really damage the battery?
Is it always better to charge iPod with AC adapter?
Any answer will be appreciated, thanks in advance anyway

Even if you use an a/c adaptor you still need the usb cable to connect it to the iPod. The very same cable you use to connect to the computer.
A firewire cable is something completely different, and although the 5th gen iPod will charge via a firewire cable they are not supplied with the iPod (because the iPod won't accept data transfer via firewire).
When reading about the iPod battery, you should remember that there is an awful lot of nonsense said. I've never found any difference whatsoever either charging via a mains adaptor or via a computer.

Flash Builder 4.6 keeps crashing with "Adobe AIR.dll_unloaded" error

Hi, Flash Builder Experts~~
Please help me~~
I' m using Flash Builder 4.6 and keep encountering Windows error "FlashBuilder.exe has stop working" anytime.
Anytime means editing, building, switching workspace, closing Flash Builder.
Windows Event Viewer recognized this error as "Application Error" and detail information as following:
Faulting application FlashBuilder.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4b707bdf, faulting module Adobe AIR.dll_unloaded, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4e741f2e, exception code 0xc0000005, fault offset 0x624bdff4, process id 0x19ec, application start time 0x01ce9ee098db209a.
My system spec as following:
OS Type: Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Service Pack 1 (32-bit)
Processor: 4 Processors
Memory: 16GB
Flash Builder version as following:
Flash Builder Edition: Flash Builder 4.6 (with SDK 3.6.0/4.5.0/4.5.1/4.6.0)
java.version: 1.6.0_16
Flash Builder.ini JVM configuration
vmargs
-Xms512m
-Xmx1024m
-XX:MaxPermSize=256m
-XX:PermSize=64m
Error dll file:
File name: C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe AIR\Versions\1.0\Adobe AIR.dll
File version: 2.5.1.17730
File size:9254 KB
Currently my colleage and I will encounter this error about 4~5 times a day, and its very frustrating
If there is any suggestion ? Maybe I can update this dll file to newer version??
Thanks for reading this discussion~~

I've been seeing what sounds like a similar problem (Windows application "BEX" error when attempting to close Flash Builder via its [X] icon).
(Win 7 Enterprise, SP1, 64-bit, i5 + 8GB RAM), Flash Builder 4.6, Java 1.7.0_07)
I tried the following:
-- Launching Tour de Flex (from the task bar icon), and then updating AIR to the latest version
-- Right-clicking on the Flash Builder task bar icon and then selecting "Run as Administrator"
-- Right-clicking on the Flash Builder task bar icon and then selecting "Troubleshoot compatability", then applying the compatability fixes it suggested.
Somewhere along the way, the problem went away. I then ran the compatability troubleshooter again and (I think) removed the compatability changes (since windows security was asking me whether I want to let the application update my computer every time I launched FlashBuilder--annoying!).
The problem still appears to be fixed--but only with a whole ten minutes testing. I'll just have to see if the above is really a fix/work-around.

Webcam and Whiteboard not working with Adobe AIR with Adobe Flash Builder

Hi,
I am trying to build a simple chat service using Adobe Flash Builder target for desktop AIR( my final objective is to port it to android). My adobe AIR version is 2.5.0 and below is my source code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:WindowedApplication xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" minWidth="955" minHeight="600" xmlns:rtc="http://ns.adobe.com/rtc">
<fx:Declarations>

<rtc:AdobeHSAuthenticator id="auth" userName="Yy" protocol="rtmfp"/>
</fx:Declarations>
<rtc:ConnectSessionContainer id="session" authenticator="{auth}" roomURL="https://collaboration.adobelivecycle.com/yytan1987/myfirstroom" width="100%" height="100%">
<mx:HBox width="100%" height="100%">
<mx:VBox width="25%" height="100%">
<rtc:WebCamera width="100%" height="50%"/>
<rtc:SimpleChat width="100%" height="50%"/>
</mx:VBox>
<rtc:SharedWhiteBoard width="75%" height="100%"/>
</mx:HBox>
</rtc:ConnectSessionContainer>
</s:WindowedApplication>
Basically when i debug it with AIR, the chat is working properly but the webcam and whiteboard just don't work....I really don't know what's wrong with it already...Appreciate it if anyone can help,thanks!!
Regards

Hi,
My take is , is your autopromote tuned on for the room. I mean whats
your user role when an user enters the room(who is not host), is it 10
or 50. If its 10 i.e. viewer , then he cant use his own cam etc. You
need to take a look at the logs when an user enters and if its 10 and
you want to give him these permissions, turn autopromote on from the
devconsole for the room to make his role 50 i.e. publisher.
I just now downloaded 2.5.1 AIR and created a new project with your
source and I am able to use everything.
Thanks
Hironmay Basu

Why my MacBook Pro 15.4" did not come with a Unibody LCD Screen Glass Cover

Why my Apple MacBook Pro 15.4" did not come with a Unibody LCD Screen Glass Cover? The black glossy bezel around the screen.
Can somone please help me?

Did you get the anti-glare version? Or a really old MacBook Pro?

Old MP3 player firmware was better than new. W

One questionWhy new Zen V Plus after restart dosn't remember previous time. Listening ?50 min audiobook mp3?file. Pause? on 0:30:00, Turn off player. After restart player again file from 0:00:00.So I need remember what minute?I stop... and after reverse. Not smart. I my old Creative Muvo2, after restart always remember?previous time.

question was.Why in old type MP3 player have?"good timer memory" for not finished track? after restart player. New type Zen ... after restart player reset timer to "zero"

Why does iPhone (3gs) sound better than Macs via Bluetooth?

Why does my iPhone (3gs) sound so much better via Bluetooth on my (Jawbone) Jambox than my new Mac Mini or 3 year old MacBook Pro? Proxmity is about the same and doesn't seem to make a difference.
sound from via Bluetooth sounds muted like in a cave or can, pretty darn good from the iPhone, ideas? (in a test I did with a Braven speaker via Bluetooth = same, in that case the Macs sounded even worse!)
Thanks,
Paul

If I were you then I would have asked this question in the mac forums
as people there have a much much higher chance of owning those macs then people in the iphone forum who could own windows computer or linux computer or no computer at all

Does intel based imac come with adobe flash player?

I am a new imac user. I have just purchased an intel based imac with Safari. Every time I try to watch videos on the internet or watch live tv it's telling me I need adobe flash player but then I read all these things telling me about the danger of downloading it.

Download it from the actual Adobe site, then you will be fine. Just type in safari http://www.adobe.com/ and follow the link to 'Flash Player'

Why Flash player performance is better than Player comes with Adobe air ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for