Why IDoc Sender Channel Used in Outbound Scenario's

Hi Team,
In my outbound scenario's ,I never used IDoc sender channel.Only ALE settings I have configured..PartnerProfile,RFC dest,Port etc.
Why can we use Idoc Sender channel? Is it only used for IDocFlat file format OR for normal Idoc's also? If we use Idoc sender Channel , how it is processing - Is it TRFC queues-sm58 ?
Can you give me clear idea on it / suggect any blogs.
Thanks.
Drumi

HI,
In my outbound scenario's ,I never used IDoc sender channel.Only ALE settings I have configured..PartnerProfile,RFC dest,Port etc.
Why can we use Idoc Sender channel? Is it only used for IDocFlat file format OR for normal Idoc's also? If we use Idoc sender Channel , how it is processing - Is it TRFC queues-sm58 ?
we dont necessary to create Sender Communication channel for IDOC and Proxy and http because xi and sender systems(out bound) resides on abap stack and also dont need for any idoc.
The reason is that R/3 can directly send Idocs to XI via ALE layer using RFC destination specified in SM59.
This IDoc after reaching XI is converted in IDoc-XML. This is done when we specify IDoc metadata IDX2 in XI. It is then used in IR for mapping.
Now for the receiver side, when IDoc-XML is created after mapping program run is sent to R/3. Before that, it has to
be converted into IDoc. This conversion is IDoc-XML to IDoc is done by IDoc Receiver adapter.
one case we need to create sender IDoc Communication channel for IDOC packaging concept thats all.
thanks,
Edited by: bhavanisankar.solasu on Dec 16, 2011 7:12 AM

Similar Messages

Java IDOC_AAE configuration issue in PI IDOC sender channel and in ECC SM58.

Dear Experts,
My configuration scenario is outbound: SAP (IDOC)-------->PI------->AS2 ThirdParty.
SAP PI version: 7.31 dual stack.
First time i have done IDOC_AAE settings done in ECC and PI NWA with the help of below links.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-34155
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-31398
While sending the DESADV.DELVRY05 standard idoc from ECC to PI i am getting below error in Sender IDoc channel.
Could you please help me on this issue ,I will appriciate you .This is very urgent.
Error in PI IDOC Sender channel : Processing error = Value with name ApplyCntlRecFromPayload not available
and I are getting below error in SM58 ECC system.
Error in ECC SM58: Commit fault: ASJ.ejb.005043 (Failed in component:
Thanks,
Aadi

Hi Aadi,
Please check the below SAP notes
1952406 - "Commit fault" error in SM58 transaction when sending IDOC from backend system to PI sender Java IDOC adapter
1928302 - Possible NullPointerException with IDOC_AAE sender channels processing
reference - Commit fault: ASJ.ejb.005043 (Failed in component: sap.com/com.sap.aii.ad) while sending to PI system
also check the link - http://saphelp.me/commit-fault-asj-ejb-005043/
regards,
Harish

SOAP Sender Channel Failed to render XIMessage. Reason: java.io.IOException

I am attemping to set up a sender channel using the SOAP adatper to process HTTP(S) posts containg a file that is being uploaded.
The Sender channel is set up to use HTTPS With Client Authentication, and selected "Do Not Use SOAP Envelope" -- since the payload will not be SOAP. I am simply trying to generate a message in PI from the HTTP post.
I have posted the data but am getting the following error in the channel:
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessageFormatException: Failed to render XIMessage. Reason: java.io.IOException: Missing mandatory element <sap:Main>sap:Receiver/sap:Service
The trading partner I am workgin with only has the ability to use a generic POST (I believe he is usnig CURL or some some other tool the 'post' the data.

Thank you for your reply.
The solution I am seeking is not for XML payload. Its a flat-file that one of our trading partners is sending to us, both for flat files as well as EDI/X12 data. I have the checkbox selected to not use the SOAP Envelope and am using the "nosoap=true" in the URL.
This should be simple, as all we need to do is to pass the data as posted by the trading partner to a SFTP or FILE adapter on the receiver side. Nothing more than we've already done using an AS2 Sender channel for, the trouble with in case case our trading partner does not support any encrypted transports except for HTTPS.
-Gerry

Do we need a sender channel for IDOC to file scenario.

Hi,
Do we need a sender channel in IDOC to FILE scenario.
Because IDOC is being sent by SAP R/3 System and when creating objects in ID using wizard, it doesn't ask for sender channel.
What is the reason for this?
Regards,
Younus

Younus,
to add more...
From <b>WAS(Web Application Server) 6.20</b> and above BASIS is not the runtime for SAP.WAS is the runtime for SAP.
And it has got ABAP and JAVA engine in it.
It handles connections made over various protocols such as SMTP for mail, HTTP(S), and SOAP/XML.
<b>
The SAP Web AS 6.10 did not have a Java engine.</b>
and IDOC and HTTP are present on the ABAP engine and the rest reside on JAVA engine.
and that is the reason why IDOC and HTTP doesnt require Sender Adapter and Sender Aggrement aswell.
Hope i cleared ur point...
Cheers,
Raghavesh
Message was edited by:
Raghavesh Reddy

Why no sender idoc adapter .

hi,
while configuring idoc to file ......... why we are not using sender communication channel or configuring sender idoc adapter ..............
thanks in advance,
jp.

The main use of a sender adapter is to convert the input format into an XI supported XML format. Once this is done, the sender agreement appends the header with the sender details. In the case of IDoc adapter, you would not require a sender agrrement or a sender channel for the following reasons
1. The adapter resides on ABAP stack hence the integration server takes care of the IDoc to XML conversion without requirement for adapter.
2. The business system that is sending the adapter has already been assigned to a technical system which normally acts as an Integration server.
3. In the system, you fill in the adapter specific identifiers where you define under the IDoc adapter, the Logical system name and the R/3 client and the number.

How to use IDOC and RFC adapter in 1 scenario?

We have AAA field and BBB field and we want to send AAA field to receiver sap system using IDOC adapter and BBB field to receiver sap system using RFC adapter. But how to use IDOC and RFC adapter in 1 scenario and how to map and what are the design and configuration objects we require to create?

To achieve this you have to use
Two Interface Determinations
Two Communication Channels (IDOC & RFC)
& Two Receiver Aggrements.
Use the Enhanced Interface determination and give your conditions there. Based on you condition your interface mapping will be triggered and data will be sent to IDOC & RFC respectively.

How to re-use one SOAP Sender Channel for two different messages?

Hi!
I have an XI Proxy to SOAP Sync Scenario. 5 messages uses only 2 channels - cc_XI_Sender and cc_SOAP_Receiver. All messages comes from one Sender Channel and goes to one Receiver channel, and it works fine.
When I make the same for SOAP to XI Proxy Sync Scenario, I've got a problem. For example I have 2 different messages (mi_so_MSG_ONE and mi_so_MSG_TWO), so it works, if I had a two different sender channels (cc_SOAP_R1 and cc_SOAP_R2).
If I set the same Sender Channel in both Sender Agreements (cc_SOAP_R1), only one message (mi_so_MSG_ONE) goes without errors. When I send a second message (mi_so_MSG_TWO), in SXMB_MONI this message comes from Business System (BS_TEST) as message type one (mi_so_MSG_ONE), and then in stage of transformation in Interface Determination goes to message mapping program for other kind of messages (MM_MSG_ONE_to_XI_PROXY). And then - error in message mapping.
I try many URLs for both messages:
1) http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=:BS_TEST:cc_SOAP_R1&version=3.0&Sender.Service=&Interface=
2) http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=:BS_TEST:cc_SOAP_R1&version=3.0&Sender.Service=BS_TEST&Interface=*
3) http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=:BS_TEST:cc_SOAP_R1&version=3.0&Sender.Service=BS_TEST&Interface=...MyNameSpace...mi_so_MSG_TWO
Message in payload:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>

<MSG_TWO xmlns="urn:xxx:yyy:MyNameSpace" xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">... some fields... </MSG_TWO>
But in SOAP Header I see that is NOT second message!
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
< !-- Inbound Message   -->
<SAP:Main>
<SAP:MessageClass>ApplicationMessage</SAP:MessageClass>
<SAP:ProcessingMode>synchronous</SAP:ProcessingMode>
<SAP:MessageId>93233F70-3E2F-11DF-8CD3-00237D301CD6</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:TimeSent>2010-04-02T08:13:09Z</SAP:TimeSent>
<SAP:Sender>
    <SAP:Service>BS_TEST</SAP:Service>
    <SAP:Interface namespace="urn:xxx:yyy:MyNameSpace">mi_so_MSG_ONE</SAP:Interface>
</SAP:Sender>
<SAP:Interface namespace="urn:xxx:yyy:MyNameSpace">mi_so_MSG_ONE</SAP:Interface>
</SAP:Main>
Is it correct that many kinds of messages cannot goes through one Sender Channel ? If not... How can I reuse one SOAP Sender Channel for both this messages?
Thanks for helping.

Thanks for answers!
It means a webservice application will be deployed and exposed in PI using the associated Message Interface and its namespace information in the SOAP Sender channel.
It means only one Sender Channel per one pair of names (name of Message Interface and name of namespace). And it will fail if I change something. And question is: why URL for sending SOAP message contains parameter "Interface"?
"backward compatibility" or "for future use only"?
Nothing happens when I change this parameter, seems that name of Interface comes from first of founded Sender Agreements.
If the structures are the same
No. Structures are different.
Making one structure per all SOAP incoming messages looks workable, but... looks strange (in fact I have a lot of SOAP messages, more than 100 Sender channels).
I found an information, that I can use one Sender channel per many messages with different structures only if I make this messages like different Operations in one Service Interface (in PI 7.1).
But in this case in list of messages in SXMB_MONI I will see only a one name of Service Interface for all my messages and it's not so comfortably for supporting: to take a name of operation that fails I need to goes inside.
In older version of XI (prior 7.1) using one sender channel per many messages allowed without any hints.

Issue while archiving the processed file in sender communication channel using SFTP adapter

Hi All,
In one of my scenario (File to IDOC), we are using SFTP sender communicationchannel.
we are facing an issue while archiving the processed file. Some times PI processed the file successfully but unable to archive it and in the next poll PI process & archives the same file successfully which will creates duplicate orders in ECC.
Please let us know how to resolve this issue.

Hi Anil,
Refer Archiving concepts in below links.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/44/682bcd7f2a6d12e10000000a1553f6/content.htm?frameset=/en/44/6830e67f2a6d12e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-35572
Warm Regards,
DNK Siddhardha.

2 file to file scenarios and one sender channel

hello there,
i am implementing 2 file to file scenarios. referring to the below link i have 'by-pass' integration repository in order to perform my file to file transfer since both the input and output files have the same structure, hence no mapping is required.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417500%29ID0036662950DB01052533299951691312End?blog=/pub/wlg/4383 --> How to send any data (even binary) through XI, without using the Integration Repository
as seen in the link provided above, it is mentioned to provide a 'dummy' interface and namespace as no such things were created in the IR.
Now i have a second development which perform the same task(file 2 file) however the naming and source/target directory for the second one differs fromt eh first.
that is for the first one the source directory is srcroot/folder1/ and for the secon one is srcroot/folder2
the target for the first scenario is trtroot/folder1 and second is trtroot/folder2.
i wanted to use the same sender channel, making use of the advanced features to pick the files from the different directories, however the scenario always put my files, even those from srcroot/folder2, in the first target folder that is in trtroot/folder1 instead of trtroot/folder2.
one easy way of doing this, is to create channels for each scenario, but if possible i want to use one sender channels for both, is that possible for my scenarios?
can anyone please advise me?
if there is a better way, you are welcome to share it with me.
thank in advance.

Hi,
You can pick the data using same sender channel.
But there are two ways of putting the files to their corresponding destinatios:
1)Using 'Adapter Specific Message Attribute' in communication channel.
But for this to work you have write UDF in your mapping, but as you are not using IR part, this approach can't be used.
2) Another way is, you can use variable substitution method, where the values of the target directory is populated by payload of the incoming file.
If this is not possible, then there is no way but to define 2 diffrent communication channels for receiver.
-Supriya.

File not able to pick while using FCC at sender channel

Hi Experts ,
we design one scenario that we need to process flat file to ECC. So we have used FCC at sender channel.
while we testing , only its showing as successfull logs in channel , but we not able to pick the file.
could you please check the below details and let me know it i missed any thing.
PFB file which need to pick.
PFA scrren shot of FCC
26.Jun 2014 #123
Country|Currency|Amount|Code|Rate
Australia|dollar|1|AUD|18.989
Brazil|real|1|BRL|9.119
Bulgaria|lev|1|BGN|14.037
Canada|dollar|1|CAD|18.836
China|renminbi|1|CNY|3.242
Croatia|kuna|1|HRK|3.623
Denmark|krone|1|DKK|3.682
EMU|euro|1|EUR|27.455
Hongkong|dollar|1|HKD|2.603
Hungary|forint|100|HUF|8.916
IMF|SDR|1|XDR|31.154
India|rupee|100|INR|33.540
Indonesia|rupiah|1000|IDR|1.668
Israel|shekel|1|ILS|5.883
Japan|yen|100|JPY|19.824
Lithuania|litas|1|LTL|7.952
Malaysia|ringgit|1|MYR|6.272
Mexico|peso|1|MXN|1.550
New Zealand|dollar|1|NZD|17.678
Norway|krone|1|NOK|3.286
Philippines|peso|100|PHP|46.019
Poland|zloty|1|PLN|6.627
Romania|new leu|1|RON|6.258
Russia|rouble|100|RUB|59.842
Singapore|dollar|1|SGD|16.137
South Africa|rand|1|ZAR|1.894
South Korea|won|100|KRW|1.986
Sweden|krona|1|SEK|2.989
Switzerland|franc|1|CHF|22.569
Thailand|baht|100|THB|62.119
Turkey|lira|1|TRY|9.469
United Kingdom|pound|1|GBP|34.361
USA|dollar|1|USD|20.179
FCC details
channel logs.
regards
raju

Hi Peddaraju,
Cross check correct source directory and file name is maintained in the sender file communication channel. If everything is fine try to restart the XPI File Adapter service in NWA.
Troubleshoot as suggested in the below thread:
File Adapter in PI not reading file from file system.
Regards,
Krupa

Outbound IDOC - Sender and reciever

Hello SDNites,
I have created a report pgm which is equipped to send an outbound IDOC i.e used FM 'MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE'. Can someone please tell me how do I decide my sender and reciever when populating the control record in this FM.
I know sender will be my system and reciver will be third party system but can you please tell me what values need to be opulated there or

Thanks for the information,
Can you please give the info in following form,
1. Partner profile configuration with the values in your system.
2. Code snippet where control records are poulated for Outbound IDOC with the values you specified in step 1.
This will help me in understanding the same.
Regards,
Abhi

B2B scenario with IDocs, sender system not in SLD

Hello all
When sending a purchase order IDoc (ORDERS05) out of SAP ECC 6.0 I get the following error in SM58:
No service for system SAPPEE, client 200 in Integr ation Directory
Message no. SR053
Until now I did not register the SAP ECC 6.0 system in the SLD. Is this absolutely mandatory?
The RFC-Destinations work like a charm, the user (type C) and authorizations (for now SAP_ALL) should be ok (same settings in XI and SAP ECC system).
In the integration directory I defined a partner "IDOC_SENDER" with the following identifiers:
Agency = http://sap.com/xi/XI
Scheme = XIParty
Name = IDOC_SENDER
Agency = PEE_200 (SID with client from customers system)
Scheme = ALE#LI#LF
Name = 0000601140 (this is the vendor id from customers point of view)
Agency = AEE_200 (SID with client from vendors system)
Scheme = ALE#KU
Name = 0000001011 (this is the customer id from vendors point of view)
Within this partner "IDOC_SENDER" I defined a business service "Order" and assigned ORDERS.ORDERS05 as allowed outbound-interfaces.
Within this business service "Order" I defined a sender communication channel "Order_send_IDOC" with adapter type IDoc.
Based on this I created a receiver determination, interface determination, etc.
I also configured things in IDX1, IDX2. The metadata (structure info of idoc type ORDERS05) was successfully loaded.
Did I miss something? What to do to eliminate this error:
No service for system SAPPEE, client 200 in Integr ation Directory
Message no. SR053
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance
Renaud

I think there are some mis-configurations:
defined a business service "Order" and assigned ORDERS.ORDERS05 as allowed outbound-interfaces.
You do not define a business service when IDOC/ RFC/ PROXY is sender/ receiver
It should be Business System and it has to be defined in SLD and then imported in ID. (search on SDN for How to create Business System )
defined a sender communication channel "Order_send_IDOC" with adapter type IDoc.
You do not create Sender channel when IDOC/ PROXY is sender.
I would suggest that you follow steps mentioned in this wiki: http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/SAPR3%28Idocs%29ToXI--Steps+Summarized
Regards,
Abhishek.

Issues with creating and sending BOM XML IDOC to SAP using 2010 WCF-SAP Adapter (without using Biztalk Server)

I'm trying to replace an existing Biztalk 2006 Send BOM IDOC process, and completely remove Biztalk server from the equation. The existing Bizatalk 2006 server receives an input BOM (Bill of Materials) flat file, and using a Biztalk Map (BM08),
and Orchestration, generates an Idoc and sends it to SAP.
In my replacement C# program, I'm using the 2010 WCF-SAP Adapter, and am trying to generate the BOMMAT03 XML IDOC it to SAP.
I generated the BOMMAT03 schema from SAP using the Add Adapter Service in VS 2010. I was able to generate a BM08 XSLT from the existing BMO8 map in the current Biztalk 2006 process. I am able to run a XSLT transform on the input BOM flat
file, and generate an XML file from that.
However, I've run into a few issues. First of which, is that the XML file that is generated from the XSLT transform is NOT the same schema as the BOMMAT03 schema expects. It's somewhat similar, but different enough that I have to manually
translate between the two in my code. I've verified that both the original Bitztalk 2006 process and my replacement program use BOMMAT V3 from SAP. Question--Is Biztalk 2006 server doing some other magic to turn that transormed XML into the BOMMAT03
schema?
I ended writing code which translates the transformed XML into the BOMMAT03 schema (which is a strong typed XML IDOC at this point).
However, when I try to send the BOMMAT03 XML IDOC, I get an exception "Object reference not set to an instance of an object."
idocClient.Send(idocData, ref sadapterTxGuid);
idocData is of type BOMMAT03, and I've verified that the various fields are populated.
Any help is appreciated.

Well, putting in a MSDN subscription support ticket for Biztalk server actually helped with the issue. They didn't find, or fix the issue directly. But one of the examples (https://randypaulo.wordpress.com/tag/idoc/) they sent over, jogged my
memory, and I realized in the code snippet below, I had accidentally deleted the 1st line. Such a simple mistake, yet was easy to overlook. The URL example is almost EXACTLY like my code, but without the transform and translation code to convert
from input XML file to IDOC XML. If someone is interested in that, let me know.
//Forgot the 1st line.
idocClient = new IdocBOMMAT03SIEIS_WED_BOMMAT03V3R700Client(binding, endpointAddress);
idocClient.Send(idocData, ref sadapterTxGuid);
For anyone else interested in knowing, you CAN send a strongly typed IDOC to SAP using C#.NET and the WCF SAP 2010 Adapter, using the IDOC Binding Client class you generated using the Add Adapter Service Reference in VS2010.
The one difference, which no one, not even the tech support from MS could tell me, was why the XSLT which I generated from the original map, did not transform the input BOM XML into the BOMMAT03 XML. Instead, it transformed it into an intermediate
XML, which resembled the BOMMAT03 IDOC XML, but still needed to be translated to the BOMMAT03 IDOC format.
The tech support person swore up and down that it should. But I believe that something happens in Biztalk server, after the Mapping occurs, maybe in the Pipeline, which converts that
intermediate XML into the final BOMMAT03 IDOC XML format.
I do think that the examples are severely lacking in showing how to send a strong typed IDOC using C# and the WCF-SAP Adapter. Even worse, the examples are completely lacking in how to actually generate a weakly typed IDOC. They show how to send
that weakly typed IDOC, but show me, or give me a class to be able to generate it.
I realize that this is not quite the "recommended way" to do it, but in reality, not everyone wants or even needs a full Biztalk installation. For some simple stuff like this, a C#.NET program and WCF-SAP adapter do the trick.

How to send email to a SMTP server over a secure channel using STARTTLS setting of a send connector (Exchange and SMTP server are in the same domain)

I’m trying to send email using exchange send connector STARTTLS setting to the SMTP server. I have read multiple documents on configuring TLS for send connector, but they talks about outbound connections to internet facing servers. My Exchange 2013 and SMTP
server is in the same domain (let’s say A.com) and I’m creating dummy domains on my SMTP server (e.g.
[email protected],
[email protected] ) and their respective send connectors on the exchange server end. In the smart host section added the IP address of the SMTP server and in the scoping section added the SMTP domain address (e.g. dummy1.local ). In the FQDN field, added
the FQDN of the exchange server 2013 which certificate is enabled with SMTP service.
Could you tell me a step by step procedure, where I’m going wrong or any extra settings needs to added?
Presently, it is giving me an error that 530 5.5.1 TLS encrypted connection is required.
Note: I’ve created the Microsoft CA certificates for the SMTP and exchange servers and imported them in the personal certificate container. In which, the exchange certificate is created with FQDN name of the server and enabled for the SMTP service.
I’m using OPENSSL certificate for making the SMTP server TLS enabled. (let me know, if I need to import the OPENSSL certificate anywhere on the exchange end)?
Thanks!

-IgnoreSTARTTLS is set to false on the send connector properties.
I'm trying to established a HTTP over TLS connection. I'm not using mutual TLS between these two server.
The send connector protocol logging is attached as below,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.468Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,2,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,220 SMTP.A.local Welcome (MTA version),
2014-09-22T20:09:45.546Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,3,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,>,EHLO Exchange.A.local,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,4,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-SMTP.A.local Exchange.A.local OK,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,5,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-SIZE,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,6,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-8BITMIME,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,7,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-BINARYMIME,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,8,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-PIPELINING,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,9,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-HELP,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,10,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-DSN,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,11,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-CHUNKING,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,12,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-AUTH SCRAM-SHA-1 GSS-SPNEGO DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 NTLM,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,13,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-AUTH=SCRAM-SHA-1 GSS-SPNEGO DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 NTLM,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,14,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-STARTTLS,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,15,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-DELIVERBY,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.624Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,16,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-MT-PRIORITY,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.640Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,17,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.655Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,18,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,>,STARTTLS,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.671Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,19,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,<,220 2.7.0 Ready to start TLS,
2014-09-22T20:09:45.687Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,20,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,*,,Sending certificate
2014-09-22T20:09:45.687Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,21,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,*,CN=Exchange.A.local,Certificate subject
2014-09-22T20:09:45.687Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,22,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,*,"CN=DC-CA, DC=A, DC=local",Certificate issuer name
2014-09-22T20:09:45.687Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,23,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,*,63E7E70100000000000B,Certificate serial number
2014-09-22T20:09:45.687Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,24,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,*,CAEB1200CDF49715E5F2E4B8315EFDDC01F8F945,Certificate thumbprint
2014-09-22T20:09:45.780Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,25,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,*,Exchange.A.local,Certificate alternate names
2014-09-22T20:09:46.654Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED5,26,10.219.3.74:24939,10.219.3.73:25,-,,Local
2014-09-22T20:09:46.669Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,0,,10.219.3.73:25,*,,attempting to connect
2014-09-22T20:09:46.685Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,1,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,+,,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.701Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,2,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,220 SMTP.A.local Welcome (MTA version),
2014-09-22T20:09:46.701Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,3,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,>,EHLO Exchange.A.local,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,4,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-SMTP.A.local Exchange.A.local OK,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,5,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-SIZE,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,6,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-8BITMIME,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,7,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-BINARYMIME,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,8,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-PIPELINING,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,9,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-HELP,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,10,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-DSN,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,11,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-CHUNKING,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,12,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-AUTH SCRAM-SHA-1 GSS-SPNEGO DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 NTLM,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,13,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-AUTH=SCRAM-SHA-1 GSS-SPNEGO DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 NTLM,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.716Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,14,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-STARTTLS,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.732Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,15,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-DELIVERBY,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.732Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,16,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250-MT-PRIORITY,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.732Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,17,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.810Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,18,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,*,,sending message with RecordId 52652004081667 and InternetMessageId <[email protected]>
2014-09-22T20:09:46.810Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,19,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,>,MAIL FROM:<> SIZE=7653 BODY=BINARYMIME,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.810Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,20,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,>,RCPT TO:<[email protected]>,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.825Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,21,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,530 5.5.1 A TLS-encrypted connection is required,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.950Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,22,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,<,503 5.5.1 unexpected RCPT command,
2014-09-22T20:09:46.981Z,Exchange-SMTP send connector,08D1A4A14C7EDED6,23,10.219.3.74:24940,10.219.3.73:25,>,RSET,

Why can't I send Photos using Message on my Mac w Yosemite

I have just tried to send a photo, taken w my iPhone 6 and properly shared automatically to my MBP w/Yosemite.
I cannot send it via email; I cannot send it via Messages.
I checked for solutions re email; I use Postbox as my email client which may be the problem, though not sure how to fix.
Right now I want to know why I can't use Messages either! It had been working OK till now for text msgs.
Ideas/solutions would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance

thanks for replying; yes I did use that. Sorry I didn't mention.
The email option is grayed out when I tried to use it.
Oddly, I found a work around, which was to send the pics from my iPhone, which I guess uses the iOS version of Mail.
thanks

Why IDoc Sender Channel Used in Outbound Scenario's

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for