Why is a 90 minute DVD taking 8 hours to encode?

I've got a top of the range MacBook Pro with 200GB free. It's taking 8 hours to encode a 60GB video. I'm assuming it's taking this long because of the raw video size - is there any way I can compress the video into an appropriate format before encoding the DVD? Otherwise, it's going to take ages...
Thanks!

If a 90 minute video takes up 60GB it must be in High Definition, as standard DV streams only take up 13GB per hour.
In that case your CPU has to do quadruple the work, and 8 hours may be about right.
Best thing to do is leave it to do it overnight!

Similar Messages

  • Why did iDVD 6 take more than 14 hours to encode 24 minutes of video?

    Hello,
    This is my first post here and even being a total Mac beginner it surprised me when idvd 06 took more than 14 hours to encode and burn a 24 minute imovie project to dvd. Does anybody know WHY this happened? I bought this machine to do nothing but video editing, but if this is the way it's going to be I will have no choice but to return it to the store and try something else. I have an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz 17"/160GB/250GB external/1GB RAM
    I hope somebody can explain what happened, because the capture/edit/create dvd process was a breeze, and I used the "Best Performance" option.
    Thanks
    Luis

    Luis
    Round here we spell 'idiot' as 'inexperienced'
    Encoding/rendering is the same whether you 'save as disk image' or straight to a burn via iDVD, less of course the burn time which comes later. BTW, I use Toast 7 to burn, not disk utility. More options. Burn time, including 'verification' is about 50% of the running time, or a little less.
    The main advantage of saving to a disk image is that you can burn as many copies as you like from it without having to re-encode from scratch. This becomes ultra-important when it is a wedding video that every relative and their dog want a copy of!
    I have a G5 iMac, not as fast as a dual Intel machine, but does what I want. My son has a Macbook Pro (Intel). The main difference is that an iMac can house a much bigger hard disk that a Macbook.
    I can't say for sure, but I simply assume that a desktop Mac is faster than a portable laptop, even if they have the same processor. (200 Level 4 contributors will now pile in to tell me that I must be nuts.) Just my gut feeling. But yes, a Mac Pro will be faster than anything else - one of the reasons they are twice the price (and no monitor).
    If you are going to do video editing for a living then use a Mac Pro with Final Cut Pro. If it is a hobby, an Imac with the biggest hard disk it can take and lots of RAM will easily suffice. The choice of software is yours.
    And while we are it: burn at the slowest speed you can, 2x or 4x, a slow burn gives a better burn! Also, use decent media. I have never had a 'coaster' from Verbatim or Fuji DVD-R, but lots from all other brands I have tried. Others here say Maxell are also very good.
    Most of all: HAVE FUN!

  • Why is it taking 19 hours to encode four avi. files. I just bought a new 21" iMac last week and it is just to slow to use. Thanks

    I just bought a new 21" iMac last week and it is just to slow to use. Before it used to take a couple of hours now its just way too long

    Hi
    As I understands it - This has nothing to do with Your iMac - Any Mac would take the same time.
    May be OS and support on the Window-PC platform handles this better.
    • .avi - is no specific codec (file format) but a container and the codec in this might not be one that iDVD can directly use (encode to .mpeg2 as on DVD disks)
    So either it just can't do it - or -
    iDVD has to back-encode to an usably codec - THIS IS WHAT I THINK HAS HAPPENED
    This back-encoding can take serious time - AND the final result usually is far from Good.
    I would
    • find out in what codec the .avi file is (I use QuickTime and in this inspector to read what codec .avi contains) (.mov is also a container)
    • import it into a program that can transcode to a better codec for iDVD - streamingDV or AIC (I GUESS)
    • then use this in iDVD
    Yours Bengt W

  • Why is my ios7.1 update taking 4 hours

    First try at update ended with update failed message. Second attempt is showing 4 or 5 hours remaining on the download. Download is via wifi but that is the only I use the device. I had already updated three other devices with no problems. If it is now an issue with the server, is there any way to stop the download?

    First, your battery remaining is a model. Post update that model needs to be rebuilt. Try to use your battery down to about ten percent then charge it up to one hundred. Do this three times.
    Next, go into settings battery and see what is using the battery.If you are backing up or restoring from the cloud, your cellular or WiFi radios are being used a good deal. Otherwise you might have an errant program. Do you have the Facebook app? some have reported that being a problem.

  • Video taking 40 hours to encode

    Ok, so I finished editing a video and I went to export it. Sent it to AME, and the Estimated Remaining Time said it had 40 hours to complete. On my old computer this would've been normal, but now I have it on my much better computer so this makes no ******* sense. The specs for the computer I am currently using to export are...
    OS: Windows 7 Home Premium
    Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2
    CPU: AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Quad Core
    RAM: 8GB DDR3
    Storage: 1TB SATA HDD 7200RPM
    GPU: EVGA nVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Superclocked 2GB
    Power: Coolmax ZX-700 700W 80 Plus
    Now I'm no expert with these new fangled computational calculators, but I think my system is good enough to run Premiere. It's also weird because the final size of the video (according to Premiere) is 873MB. I've exported 7GB videos that took less time. Is it something with the video? This is the media I used...
    AVI video, 14:19 long, 1024x768, 280000kbps video bitrate, 1500kbps audio bitrate, 6.55GB
    WAV audio, 14:58 long, 1500kbps bitrate, 164MB
    GIF, 500x500, 43.5KB
    PNG, 3353x3429, 4.11MB, on two video tracks, had following effects:
                                                                                                                   Crop
                                                                                                                   Compound Blur
                                                                                                                   Black & White
                                                                                                                   Sharpen
                                                                                                                   Horizontal Flip (on one)
    Also, these are the sequence settings I was using...
    Timebase: 29.97fps
    Framesize: 1366x768
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: Square Pixel (1.0)
    Fields: No Fields (Progressive Scan)
    Display Format: 30fps Drop-Frame Timecode
    Audio Sample Rate: 48000 Hz
    Audio Display Format: Audio Samples
    Preview File Format: Microsoft AVI
    Codec: Intel IYUV codec
    I'm exporting the video using the YouTube 1080p 29.97fps preset.
    This is probably way too much info that is completely useless, but I figured I might as well give all the info I can. Does anyone know why my video is taking so long to export?

    In addition to what Steven said, imagine your workflow on this computer.
    You have a FX-4100 CPU. It does not have hyper threading, only 4 cores, lacks full support for SSE 4.1+ extensions, which are used extensively during encoding if they are available.
    You have only 8 GB memory, which is about bare minimum.
    You indicate only a single disk for all the editing stuff.
    You start with video material with 1024x768 in a 1366x768 sequence which you uprez to 1920x1080.
    You use PNG's with 3353x3429 resolution.
    You export to a highly compressed format with a final size of 873 MB.
    All these resolution changes and PAR changes need to be calculated by a CPU that lacks hyper threading, that lacks the sorely needed SSE extensions and it has to do that in a very restricted memory space, using a single disk, that is needed for media, media cache, previews, project, export, pagefile (which is used extensively) and Windows house keeping. It is like a very popular nightclub that attracts lots of people every day, but has only one narrow single door for entry, departure and deliveries. That causes traffic jams, with long queues of people waiting to get in and similar queues of people waiting to leave. That single narrow door is like your single disk.
    The waiting is further aggravated by the doorman who has to direct traffic at the door and he is hampered by his arthritis, so he can't move very quickly, like your CPU. Another factor is the very limited space of the vestibule, like your memory. Finally, when people are squeezed into that tiny vestibule, it causes further delays to leave your coat or retrieve it, like the compression you apply.
    Under ideal conditions your system would be around 6 - 8 times slower than a fast system, but with your workflow is may well be 12 - 15 times slower. In that case a fast system with the same workflow would take around 2.5 to 3 hours for the same encoding, which is not at all unreasonable, given the fantasizing you require the CPU to do by first - as Steven put so eloquently - inventing pixels that were not in the original picture and then compressing each frame with all its imaginary content to such a large degree.
    You can improve on your workflow by first reducing the PNG's to a size that more closely resembles your sequence setting, and exporting to 1366x768 like Steven said.

  • Why is it taking 4 hours to sync my phone with Icloud, why is it taking 4 hours to sync my phone with Icloud

    Why is it taking 4 hours to sync my iphone with Icloud, when i only have 99 songs and about 15 apps?

    iCloud does not sync media and only backs up apps. Why do you believe it is taking 4 hours to sync?  Does the device actually say it is syncing?
    Is the device plugged into external power during this time?  If it is not, Wi-Fi is turning off and the device is reverting to the slower cellular network.

  • Why can't I burn 2 hrs onto a 120 minute DVD-R

    I want to burn 2 1 hour shows onto a 120 minute DVD-R but it always tells me there's not enough room. Is this because of the menus? Is there any way to use iDVD to just burn my movie content without the menu, which I don't really care about that much.

    Hi
    +I want to burn 2 1 hour shows onto a 120 minute DVD-R but it always tells me there's not enough room. Is this because of the menus?+
    Yes
    +Is there any way to use iDVD to just burn my movie content without the menu, which I don't really care about that much.+
    No - But select an as simple menu as possibly. I use "Brushed Metal" and no animation or
    background music. This should give space for 2 x 58 minutes movies at least.
    There are ways to make DVDs without menu but then the material has to be on a miniDV tape
    and the use of OneStepDVD. But there are no 120 minutes tapes as I know of.
    And I don't think that one can change tape after first one is done.
    Second alternative is to use another program eg Roxio Toast™
    This can squees in more onto a DVD (with a bit of quality loss)
    Third way is to use a Mac with a Double-Layer DVD burner and DL disks.
    Yours Bengt W

  • Why is the upgrade to iOS 7.0.4 (1.31 GB) taking ELEVEN HOURS?

    Why is the upgrade to iOS 7.0.4 (1.31 GB) taking ELEVEN HOURS?  After 2 full hours I have downloaded 240 MB!
    I realize my Internet speed of 2.5 Mbit/sec is not blistering, but it is the fastest available to me at my rural location.  It easily manages 8 to 10 GBs of material from other sites.
    There are no other users on the system and no other downloads taking place.  I am using a wired connection (not WiFi).
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Paul Good ([email protected])

    I am using iTunes and as I pointed out in my query, I am using the fastest connection available to me.
    From other sites a file of 1.31 GB would take me less than 40 minutes!

  • Why is my 40 minute long iMovie showing to be 22.9 gb in total. if i go into all my files there are extra clips there and when i delete any of them it deletes my source clip

    Why is my 40 minute long imovie video showing to be 22.9 gb in total if i go into.... all my files.... there are extra clips there and when i delete any of them it deletes my source clip. I think the video should be about 9gb

    Hey Eric,
    Thanks for taking the time. Unfortunately no that does not solve it. Same as swipe it will get me there and it will show separate programs spaced out. The issue I am having is that all my open word files are bunched up in a pile on top of each other. I can see the edges of each one but I want them to be separated from each other enough that I can visually identify what file is what.
    Again, thanks for trying, it is appreciated.

  • Why when I make a dvd from an album are my photos not in order?

    Why when I make a dvd from an album are my photos not in order?

    hansm99079164 a écrit:
    Why when I make a dvd from an album are my photos not in order?
    Simply because your Explorer/Finder only takes into account the file names and dates of your files.
    For instance, in Windows, you have to tell the explorer to sort by 'date taken' otherwise the default sort orders are file dates or file names.
    If you have given a 'custom' sort order to your albums, the only way for the Explorer to sort in the same way is to set the custom sort order in the album, export to a new folder with the 'rename' option - same starting text string plus order.

  • HT1657 Why is it taking 14 hours to download a movie? My download speed tested at 4.2MB/sec

    Why is it taking 14 hours to download a movie from iTunes? My download speed tested at 4.2MB/sec

    Find a faster WiFi connection, because the one you're on now is slowwwwwww....

  • I am going to place a 30 minutes dvd film on a website for one of my clients. Before converting tje old vhs-film to dvd I must know what format will suit the needs best. HTTP, Flash, Quicktime or something else?

    I am going to place a 30 minutes dvd film on a website for one of my clients. The film was shot 15 years ago and is in vhs-format. Before I will have the film converted into a dvd-format I want to know what format will suit my needs best. HTTP, Flash, Quicktime or something else? I will make it easy for myself placering the dvd film on the site and for the vistors who wish to look att the film.

    The DVD format (MPEG-2) isn't appropriate for Web use.
    Use QuickTime and H.264 video codec with AAC audio. Size the file at 320X240 (best fit for your old file).

  • Why when we burn a DVD from iMovie, does it pause in different places?

    Why when we burn a DVD from iMovie, does it pause in different places?

    Hi
    does it pause in different places?
    During Burn ?
    During Playback of DVD ?
    On Mac ?
    On Stand alone DVD-Player ?
    During Burn.
    What brand of DVD ?
    What type of DVD ? DVD-R or DVD+R or +/-RW - SL or DL
    Did You set down burn speed in iDVD ?
    Free space on Start-Up (Mac OS) hard disk. HOW MUCH ?
    Video codec used (feed into) iDVD ?
    Yours Bengt W

  • Im getting error  2130 when i try to download my purchased movie on a 240 minute dvd disc.

    im getting error 2130 when i try to download my purchased movie on a 240 minute dvd disc.

    This is old but I hope it helps:
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1412385?start=0&tstart=0

  • HT1498 Why is it taking 8 hours to download a rented movie?

    Why is it taking 8 hours to load a rented movie on ITV?

    Winston,
    Converted HD movies for Apple TV are not more than 2.5MB stream in HD. Apple TV gen 1 wa capable of 5Mbit with less FPS, but not newer once. Where did you get 6 and 8Mbit from?
    There is no need for that fast stream (sorry buddy but I work with streams quite a bit).
    The problem could be not a speed, but crowdeed networks. If one uses WiFI on 2.4 GHz then in crowded areas you have issue of too many overlapping WiFI networks and time sharing channels. Only three channels in WiFi band 2.4GHz do not overlap, but there are still shared by neigbors.
    That is the reason I run 5GHz Wirless-N as the only one in my neigborhood. No channel overlaps, no choppy network, no choppy movies.
    That may not be an issue of stream speeds. Just ADSL 3Mbit would be fine. Trust me as I had that for long time with Apple TV before I switched to FiOS.
    Apple TV is equipped with enough memory to buffer almost entire H.264 encoded High Definition movie so only start could be delayed if network is slower, but not by 8 hours.
    Another possibility is that Apple network is busy which I experienced quite a bit in the past especially on Friday and Saturday evenings. Rentals that time were menace.
    -Maciek
    (New Jersey crowded areas)

Maybe you are looking for

  • For all like me who have been fooled by rss disapearing in Mountain Lion Mail

    I have read lots of threads regarding the discontinued support of RSS feeds in Mountain Lion Mail, but unfortunately, after I have installed Moutain Lion (I am really angry with Apple not to have communicate on this point and to have discover it at t

  • Printing page from jsp

    how do you print the contents displayed on a jsp page?

  • Why a method isn't implemented?

    Compiler complains that getName() isn't implemented by F1 and F2. interface I {      String getName();      int getValue(); abstract class Abstract {      String name;      Abstract(String name) { this.name = name; } class Final extends Abstract {   

  • Security Update Issues Solutions Required Please :)

    I've been having issues since the latest security update for OS 1.5.8. I want to restore my system to a Time Capsule backup but my OSX install disks are for 1.4 and don't have the option to restore from backup, as far as I can see...Help?

  • Left to right parsing

    hi all, I wnat to join two tables t1,t2. t1 contains 100000 records and t2 contains 100 records. which query performs better? 1. select t1.col1,t1.col2,t2.col1 from t1 inner join t2 on t1.col1=t2.col1 2.1. select t1.col1,t1.col2,t2.col1 from t2 inner