Why is Adobe such a Mean company?

Adobe has in the past offered a complimentary upgrade for customers who have just purchased a licence before an upgrade.
I bought a Lightroom 5 licence 2 weeks before the upgrade to 6.
I have spent over one hour trying to find info on their website about upgrading (404 error continuously) then spent 30 minutes on the phone being cut off by their phone system and then finding out I was not eligible toeven speak to customer services .
Guess the £100 I spent was not really enough for them!
Anyway the low down finally discovered was that I would have to pay for a full upgrade.
For the small number of people that must have purchased in the last few weeks, it would cost them very little to give away an upgrade.
I for one, will not be buying 6 for a very long time - if ever.

Well well well! Despite being told on the phone by not one but two different Adobe Telephone Sales Reps that my Lightroom 5 is NOT eligible for upgrading to 6, I applied and wonder of wonders........ have just downloaded my free upgrade to 6!
Took them several days to think about it, but maybe Adobe are not quite as mean as I had earlier accused them of being........ just a little lacking in the employee training area.  The cynic in me might say that I should not expect a salesman to own to to a FREE upgrade being available. Not good for their sales figures!
I hope it was worth the effort!

Similar Messages

  • Why is Mozilla such an intolerant company?

    I am trying to decide whether to uninstall Firefox from my system. First I need to understand why Mozilla forced out its CEO for holding views that its staff and volunteers found heretical? This is especially interesting given that the information gathered should have been private and Mozilla is now making a "grand stand" about the need for data privacy. Not to mention Mozilla's claims to tolerance (LOL - tolerance for one and only one viewpoint - very Orwellian).
    What I would like to know is whether Mozilla will let go all those employees who provided material support to president Obama or Hillary Clinton? Both these people shared your former CEO's viewpoint and did far more to damage gay rights than the $1000 donated by the CEO. In fact, Obama ran millions of dollars worth of ads in the south targeted at black churches hilighting his support of DOMA. Clinton's husband signed DOMA into law. Clinton and Obama both publicly supported it up until 2013 when it no longer served her advantage to do so.
    I would say politicians in positions of power who supported DOMA did far more damage to the rights of gays than the $1000 donated to support prop8.
    Given the grand hypocrisy of Mozilla throughout this sad incident, I doubt anyone at Mozilla will act.

    hello, unfortunately there are quite few misconceptions and wrong media reports flying around about what happened around brendans resignation as ceo and from mozilla. please refer to https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/04/05/faq-on-ceo-resignation/ and https://medium.com/p/7645a4bf8a2 for more information on the subject.
    since this venue is a primarily community run support forum, intended to provide technical support for Mozilla products, it's not the right place to have discussions around policy issues and i'm going to close this thread. if you still have concerns on the subject that you want to discuss, please take them to the mozilla governance mailing list located at https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance instead.
    thank you!

  • Why doesnt Adobe just UPDATE Flash Professional? Arent they reinventing the wheel?

    Congratulations on getting to open beta with Flash Catalyst!
    I know its late in the game to mention something like this but why didnt Abobe just update Flash Professional?
    It seems that the arguments for flash Catalyst center around the following:
    1) smooth workflow between Photoshop & Illustrator, especially because of the same layer view
    2) No coding required to create components out of artwork
    3) Can create FXG  and FXPs to be used in Flash Builder
    4) Can create multi screen aplications
    1) 2) and 3) could all be solved by adding a new types of symbols to Flash Professional's 3 currently available symbols(MovieClip, Button, Graphic)
    1) could be solved by adding a new Sprite symbol.
    Flash Professional needs to be updated to keep up with and match the structure of AS3 anyway.
    Sprites were added in AS3 and now wireframe components are being added to the code structure, why not just at that on the design side as well?
    Sprites are essentially MovieClips with out a timeline.
    So if you created a new Sprite symbol and opened it up in the timeline, you would only see one frame with folders and layers.
    A Sprite symbol is essentially organized the in layers and folders and would just like a photoshop file.
    And if you really want it to look like a Photoshop layout, then you just move the timeline view over to the right.
    This would solve problem 1.  Designers could import their artwork into Flash Professional as a Sprite and it would be a seemless experience.
    Obviously I'm not saying that a bitmap is a sprite. But I am saying that layers of bitmaps and could be organized inside of a Sprite. And the designer could turn any of the assets into a Button, MovieClip, Graphic, Sprite, and hopefully other Classes and WireframeComponents available in Flash.
    2)&3) could be solved by adding a new Symbols for the new Wireframe Components. The Button symbol already has a template with 4 states. Why not update Flash Professional to visually represent more Classes and Component Classes, instead of just the MovieClip Class and the Button Class. Even better, maybe there could be a way to make a template for creating our own wireframe components. Just assign a base class for the wireframe class and a base template, and the introspection view will display accordingly.
    States of the component would be listed out at the top instead of frames,  just like the Button Symbol used to be.  Different layers could be designated for specific graphical parts of the component. The designer would be free to add their own layers if necessary.
    In previous versions of Flash, everything was a movieclip and everthing had a timeline. Thats not the case anymore. The timeline is for intropecting MovieClips, but this view could be different when intropsecting different types of symbols such as Sprites, Buttons, Wireframe Components, and even Custom Wireframe Components(extensible).
    These new Symbols and also Sprites could export to FXG very easily.
    The multi screen applications in 4) look pretty similar to the Slide Presentation Template. Why not just make a new MultiScreen App Template and youre done. these MultiScreenApp Templates could exporte Screens to FXG or export the whole Template to a FXP.
    I applaud the work done on the new wireframe components and FXG. Great Job!
    But, just cant understand why you cant update Flash Professional with new types of Symbols(Sprites, new Buttons and wireframe Component Classes) and a new MultiScreen App Template.
    Flash Professional needs to keep up with AS3 and also needs to export FXG and FXP.
    Why doesnt Adobe focus on on this rather than create a new Tool? These features need to be added to Flash Professional anyway.
    Isnt there more of a disadvantage to having 2  tools for designers that do the same thing?
    I'm sure this issue has been debated before. Can anyone point to me links that have the arguments for creating a separate tool instead of updating?
    Has anyone ever suggested that Flash Professional should keep up with AS3?
    Has anyone ever suggested making Sprites a new symbol in Flash Professional so that it could be more seamless with Photoshop?
    Has anyone ever suggested make Wireframe components in Flash Professional like the Button Symbol in Flash Professional?
    Has anyone ever suggested updating Flash Professional so that it would export FXG and FXP?
    What is your opinion on this?
    -thomasglyn

    @Ross
    Thanks for your explanation. I appreciate your feedback.
    I'm glad we agree that ideally there should be 2 main tools, one for designers(Flash Professional) and one for programming(Flash Builder).
    You had mentioned "But, that assumes this is possible.  As it currently stands it is not" and the reason being "Catalyst, and Builder both use a completely different framework from Professional. The component architecture is drastically different, not to mention the entire backend of the software.".
    You could also argue that, the reasons to make a separate flex component creation tool like Flash Catalyst assumes that updating Flash Professional CS4 is NOT possible. But is the statement about the framework being entirely different really true?
    Well, that depends on what you mean by the term "framework".
    Framework can refer to 3 things in this case.
    1) the component framework
    2) the code framework(AS3)
    3) the flex framework (mxml, fxg)
    If you are refering to #1 then you're right, because Adobe hasnt updated the flash component framework in Flash Professional from Flex3 Halo components to Flex4 Spark components.
    Flash components have gone through many iterations, and the switch from AS2 to AS3 was probably more profound than the new wireless component structure(Spark). And now that we have AS3, isnt the only difficulty creating a intuitive UI in Flash Professional, and adding export features?
    If you are refering to #2 then I think you're incorrect, because Flash Professional has been updated to AS3 and Flex4 Spark components use AS3. I would totally agree with you, if CS4 did not go through all of the trouble updating to AS3.
    If you are refering to #3 then you're right, because Flash Professional doesnt export mxml, fxg, or fxp, but with a little creativity, it would probably be possible to allow such an export. Adding FXG/FXP export features could be solved by creating a new type of project file.  Adobe did this for AS2, AS3, flash lite, etc. Why cant they just make a new AS3/FXG file that only allows you to build fxg/fxp exportable assets.
    Why cant Adobe make a Sprite class the default document class for AS3/FXG projects and when some adds a movie clip asset, export movie clips as swfs or swcs?
    So to be honest, after opening up Flash Catalyst again and looking at it again, I almost get the feeling that its just a Flash Component creation tool with a Photoshop UI, for the new AS3/Flex 4 components(Spark components) that Adobe just refuses to add to CS4.  CS4 uses AS3 and Spark components use AS3.  CS4 needs to be a visual design tool for all the classes in AS3(as much as possible).
    Perhaps Adobe originally meant to name this product...
    ADOBE FLASH COMPONENTS
    Or maybe Adobe Flex Components(but thats no longer true, because Flex 4 will be Flash Builder).
    In regard to "reinventing the wheel". Flash components have been reinvented several times, and I totally agree with you that this is important to "reinvent" components to keep up with new techiques as2,as3,fxg.  You are right, this is a positive thing. However in this case, I am using "reinvent in a negative sense.
    So maybe I shouldnt say "reinvent the wheel", but "reinvent the car".
    Perhaps Adobe is trying to create a wheel for the upperclass RIA programmer Flex car, and isnt making it compatible common designer/programmer Flash car. And when they finished the wheel, and they decided just to make a Segway for the Designers and Flash people to ride, that uses this new wheel.
    You might argue that its more approachable for designers, and designers feel at home because the ui is similar. This is precisely why Adobe should hurry up and finish updating the ui of the Flash Professional IDE so that its ui is more compatable with Photoshop and Illustrator. The fact that Photoshop and Illustrator is the standard for designers are perhaps one of Adobe's greatest advantages.  They could make the designers happy if they just make a Sprite inspector view with layers like photoshop in Flash Professional, instead of using the old "everything
    is a movieclip" paridgim. Flash Professional has already upgraded to AS3 and in AS3 everything isnt a movieclip.  So it would be nice if they could make views for some of the new classes and wireframe components.
    This is the age old debate, update or start from scratch.  I guess I'm saying that I think the hard work of updating to AS3 has already been done, and its just plain wierd that Adobe decides to build a separte tool for components, when they use the same AS3 code base.
    Its just insanely exciting to just think about what could have been if Flash updated and brought on more Designers and at the same time linked in the Flex community. Thats what Flash has always been about! The meeting point between Designers and Programmers.
    To go this far and quit just because of components just leaves me blue.
    It seems that many projects stop at 80% complete and if the developers just spent the extra 20% on fine tuning things then they would have a very high quality product. In this case the remaining 20% is  components, ui, and export. I understand that there are probably many things I dont understand, especially when you through in marketing, and product life cycle.
    But I think Adobe could have done it, if they put as much effort into it as they did to make an entirely new product.
    Maybe we should make some noise before its too late.
    I'm still interested in seeing more links that show the logic behind the initial discussions of this debate when it was first decided.
    pls keep me posted.
    @nwfa & macsavers
    Yes, youre right. it does seem to be their plan.  I just hope they are just testing the waters.  Perhaps after they do the initial selling of Flash Compenents, then maybe they could offer a free update to CS4.
    As I mentioned above, the main reason designers feel at home is because of the UI of Flash Catalyst. UI's can be updated, and I believe Flash Professional can and should update itsui for the reasons I mentioned above.

  • Why did Adobe see fit to eliminate, "Print Without Color Mangement"?

    Why did Adobe see fit to eliminate, "Print Without Color Mangement", and when are they going to restore it? None of their workarounds is really adequate when printing through a rip. Prior to CS5 it was all so simple. Now, I keep CS4 onboard just for printing. Is there actually a good rationale for the elimination of such a useful function?

    Adobe was forced to remove the NCA mode because the current OS X Mac print pipeline and print drivers quit supporting it. Photoshop CS5 & 6 and LR 3 & 4 can't send unmanaged data to the Mac pipeline; it'es either application managed color or printer managed color and iehter case, the data gets modified by the pipeline–which means the current apps can't send data with NCM.
    The printer utility can do a workaround to do so.
    Note, this isn't yet an issue on Windows but for cross platform uniformity, it was removed there as well. So, if you want to yell at somebody, go yell at Apple...
    And no, it ain't coming back...

  • Why does Adobe refuse to provide the latest version of Camera Raw (like my Canon 6d) for CS5?

    Why does Adobe refuse to provide the latest version of Camera Raw (like my Canon 6d) that could be supported in Photoshop CS5 or earlier?  Its like Adobe saying you want a Camera Raw for you Camera then buy CS6 which is insulting to your customers.

    Kenny_777 wrote:
    Why does Adobe refuse to provide the latest version of Camera Raw (like my Canon 6d) that could be supported in Photoshop CS5 or earlier?
    Adobe's policy to to provide free updates (not upgrades) for currently shipping software, which means the current Photoshop CS6 and Camera Raw 7.x. Development on Photoshop CS5.x and Camera Raw 6.x stopped when Photoshop CS6 started shipping. While it may appear on the surface that's it's a ploy to force users to upgrade to the most recent version when getting a new camera, it's really a policy based on the technical issues of trying to provide backwards compatible software for application that are no longer being developed.
    Camera Raw is a plug-in for Photoshop and as such, it is dependent on the Photoshop SDK in which it loads...it's also dependent upon the system level APIs being used by the applications. Could Adobe keep upgrading old software? Yes, but it would be a technical nightmare.
    Your alternative is simply use the free DNG Converter if you want to use new cameras that weren't in existence when your old software was developed. Pretty simple really and it's not designed as insult to Adobe customers...it's actually an affirmative program to make sure current users are provided support.
    The problem of new camera support for old software is really a problem caused primarily by the camera companies spawning off new cameras whose file formats are undocumented and proprietary. If the camera makers adopted a standard file format that could be opened in standard applications (kinda like DNG) then tis problem would be mitigated. You really should place the lion's share of the problem at the feet of the camera companies...

  • Why has adobe made Illustrator so clunky, difficult and unfriendly to use?

    Why has Adobe destroyed the workability of Illustrator? I've been working with Illustrator, professionally, since 1988 (and almost as long with Photoshop) and this 'Creative Cloud' incarnation is just a f******g DISASTER!!!! Do they deliberately set out to make it as difficult to use as possible? It's bad enough that  you have to sign up to this 'Creative Cloud' nonsense, but do the idiots that design the software ever try to actually work with it?!!! Have they got a clue about workflow?!!!!!
    There is ZERO customer service, and no way of giving feedback. The arrogance of Adobe is just astounding - almost as astounding as the breath-taking stupidity of the people who write the damned software. I just wish they'd stopped at Illustrator 10 - at least that was sensible and workable.
    If someone can actually - I mean REALLY - contact Adobe, you can tell them from me that their software and company policies stink - as does their arrogant indifference to paying customers evidenced by the complete absence of customer support. Also, you can tell them that their software writers are ignorant, incompetent fools.

    The poetic version would be that Adobe don't have a "vision" and simply are limping from version to version as long as they can make a buck with plugging on a handful of features every time. Specific to AI it's pretty clear that the software would have needed to be "reinvented" from the ground up 15 years ago. Similarly, the people responsible for its development now seem to prefer to waste their time with things like the barely workable new curve tool or those ridiculous MAX demos instead of tackling more fundamental issues like the atrocious and unreliable file format, import/ export handling, parametric editing and generative, reusable graphics, genuine 3D tools and whatnot.... Alas, things are as they are and thankfully there are other programs out there aplenty.
    Mylenium

  • In CC214 PS Why has adobe removed the "print Size Button"  And why have they made the Brush preview window so small you can't see the effects to accurately adjust them?

    In CC214 PS Why has adobe removed the "print Size Button"  And why have they made the Brush preview window so small you can't see the effects to accurately adjust them?
    These two things need to be remedied in their upgrades because It's become such a bother I've had to revert to older versions of PS.

    Yea, and it's a pain to get to.  What was the rational for removing the print size button?   With the magnifying glass tool selected in older versions of Photoshop you would get a button that says "print size" right next to Actual pixels, Fit Screen, Fill Screen. Now I have to go out of my way and dig for it if I want to see the print size.  Of all the buttons you could have taken away, why not fill screen?  I never use that.
    Besides the point I just downloaded the Oct Upgrade for PS and surprise! Nothing has changed and these are two big black eyes on newer versions of Photoshop.   The Brush preview window is  unchanged in CC but in CC2014 it's basically worthless.  If you apply a texture to a brush you can't properly see the scale of the texture, the spacing, scatter, etc...

  • What's wrong with this Forum? Why does Adobe take so long to reply to posts?!

    What's wrong with this Forum? Why does Adobe take so long to reply to posts?!
    This is actually "specific" to this Photoshop Forum.
    I typically get responses back from other Adobe forum promptly.
    Chime in.

    The Adobe engineering folks DO duck in here from time to time - and that's a BLESSING!  Please name any other big company where you get to interact with the engineers AT ALL.  I can't.  But I suspect the engineers actually have a lot oof real work to do, and their time here is necessarily limited.
    Your comments are more along the line of "I pay a huge amount, for that I expect better support".  These are very valid comments.  But reality is different from what we may expect, and this forum is not the place to expect Adobe support participation AT ALL.  In fact, the technical support people at Adobe often direct users to come here (something I've always found amusing).
    At the higher level, Adobe may simply not be spending enough on support for literally millions of users.  Is is greed or smart business to try to minimize support cost?  That's up for individuals to decide.
    I suggest you write a snail-mail letter to the Adobe president if you're not getting the support you need.
    -Noel

  • Why will Adobe Acrobat not load PDF from my work website, but will load on other computers?

    Why will Adobe Acrobat not load PDF from my work website, but will load on other computers?  I have to log in to a website to get our orders, and we thought it was the website at first, but have since realized it is just my computer with this issue.  I have tried uninstalling and reinstalling the software and still it does not work. 

    You ask "why", but don't provide any information...
    What is your operating system?
    What is your web browser?
    Are you asking about Adobe Reader or Acrobat?
    What is your Reader / Acrobat version?
    What exactly means "will not load"?

  • Why is it such a pain to use java in a country that uses commas as decimal?

    Why is it such a pain to use java in a country that uses commas as decimal separator?
    A few weeks back I've asked here about the keypad decimal key. For some reason, java doesn't map the decimal key to a comma on the Portuguese (Portugal) keyboard layout. I've got no answer and I ended up using a custom plainDocument on the JTextFields to replace all points with commas.
    Now, I've just spent the whole morning trying to store and use decimal numbers properly. For some reason, a Double/Float .valueOf method (or the corresponding parse method) simply ignores the locale in use and uses US defaults when parsing the string. I can't parse anything with commas in those methods and I should, as it is the decimal separator for the system and default locale being used by java.
    First of all, I shouldn't be expected to perform replacements on every single operation that comes with a comma and I obviously can't be expected to program my own locale checking to decide what decimal separator to use in each final system. Second, is there any way to work with numbers seamlessly, without having to know the locale of the end user?
    I'm sorry if this is all my fault for doing something completly wrong, I'm new to java and I did search around to no avail. I'm really frustrated with what seems to be a complete lack of support in java for locales other than the US one.

    Good old Cobol has the "DECIMAL-POINT IS COMMA" clause... And isn't it great? :)
    Second, is there any way to work with numbers seamlessly, without having to know the locale of the end user?Consider "123.456". In some locales, this number is one hundred twenty-three thousand, four hundred fifty-six. In other locales it is one hundred twenty-three and four hundred fifty-size thousandths. How will you be able to determine which, without a locale?That's not what I've meant. Java should know the locale and behave accordingly. I don't have to know the locale of the end user since it might vary greatly. My point is that if strings are flying around with commas and if comma is the decimal separator on the end user's machine, any method aimed at parsing a numeric value out of a string should regard commas as such. I'm constantly replacing dots with commas and vice versa which could cause trouble if a different locale is used.
    And I mean that as a rant. Given my inexperience with Java, there might be good reasons for such a behaviour as baftos argued. What I'm really interested is in finding the proper way to deal with this issue.
    Have you tried the NumberFormat.parse? I will now.
    Edited by: Smigh on Apr 9, 2008 9:21 AM

  • Why does Adobe Flash plugin still crash even after executing FlashAid?

    This report was generated by Flash Aid:
    Ubuntu Architecture
    Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-28-generic-pae #55-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jan 10 22:34:08 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
    Ubuntu Version
    DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
    DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
    DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
    DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS"
    Firefox Packages
    firefox install
    firefox-branding install
    firefox-gnome-support install
    Firefox binaries
    /usr/bin/firefox
    /usr/bin/firefox: symbolic link to `../lib/firefox-3.6.13/firefox.sh'
    /usr/local/bin/firefox: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/local/bin/firefox' (No such file or directory)
    /opt/firefox/firefox: ERROR: cannot open `/opt/firefox/firefox' (No such file or directory)
    Firefox divertion
    /usr/bin/firefox.ubuntu: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/bin/firefox.ubuntu' (No such file or directory)
    Sources
    google-earth.list.save
    lucid-partner.list
    lucid-partner.list.save
    medibuntu.list
    Flash packages
    adobe-flashplugin install
    Plugin locations
    /home/john/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
    /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
    /windows/.Trash-john/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
    /windows/.Trash-john/john/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
    /usr/lib/firefox/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so
    /usr/lib/iceape/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so
    /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so
    /usr/lib/midbrowser/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so
    /usr/lib/xulrunner/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so
    /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so
    Flash symlinks
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so' (No such file or directory)
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so: symbolic link to `/etc/alternatives/mozilla-flashplugin'
    /etc/alternatives/mozilla-flashplugin: symbolic link to `/usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so'
    /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so' (No such file or directory)
    /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so' (No such file or directory)
    /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
    /usr/lib/lightspark/lightspark.so: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/lib/lightspark/lightspark.so' (No such file or directory)
    /usr/lib/swfdec-mozilla/libswfdecmozilla.so: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/lib/swfdec-mozilla/libswfdecmozilla.so' (No such file or directory)
    /usr/lib/gnash/libgnashplugin.so: ERROR: cannot open `/usr/lib/gnash/libgnashplugin.so' (No such file or directory)
    /var/lib/flashplugin-installer/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so: ERROR: cannot open `/var/lib/flashplugin-installer/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so' (No such file or directory)
    /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so: ERROR: cannot open `/var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so' (No such file or directory)
    pluginreg.dat
    Generated File. Do not edit.
    [HEADER]
    Version:0.11:$
    [PLUGINS]
    IcedTeaPlugin.so:$
    /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/IcedTeaPlugin.so:$
    :$
    1294458897000:1:5:$
    The IcedTea NPR Web Browser Plugin (using IcedTea6 1.9.4 (6b20-1.9.4-0ubuntu1~10.04.1)) executes Java applets.:$
    IcedTea NPR Web Browser Plugin (using IcedTea6 1.9.4 (6b20-1.9.4-0ubuntu1~10.04.1)):$
    34
    0:application/x-java-vm:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    1:application/x-java-applet:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    2:application/x-java-applet;version=1.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    3:application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    4:application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.2:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    5:application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.3:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    6:application/x-java-applet;version=1.2:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    7:application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    8:application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.2:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    9:application/x-java-applet;version=1.3:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    10:application/x-java-applet;version=1.3.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    11:application/x-java-applet;version=1.4:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    12:application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    13:application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.2:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    14:application/x-java-applet;version=1.5:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    15:application/x-java-applet;version=1.6:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    16:application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.6.0_20:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    17:application/x-java-bean:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    18:application/x-java-bean;version=1.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    19:application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    20:application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.2:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    21:application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.3:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    22:application/x-java-bean;version=1.2:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    23:application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    24:application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.2:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    25:application/x-java-bean;version=1.3:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    26:application/x-java-bean;version=1.3.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    27:application/x-java-bean;version=1.4:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    28:application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.1:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    29:application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.2:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    30:application/x-java-bean;version=1.5:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    31:application/x-java-bean;version=1.6:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    32:application/x-java-bean;jpi-version=1.6.0_20:IcedTea:class,jar:$
    33:application/x-java-vm-npruntime:::$
    libflashplayer.so:$
    /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so:$
    :$
    1290020895000:1:5:$
    Shockwave Flash 10.1 r102:$
    Shockwave Flash:$
    2
    0:application/x-shockwave-flash:Shockwave Flash:swf:$
    1:application/futuresplash:FutureSplash Player:spl:$
    librhythmbox-itms-detection-plugin.so:$
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/librhythmbox-itms-detection-plugin.so:$
    :$
    1277463660000:1:5:$
    This plug-in detects the presence of iTunes when opening iTunes Store URLs in a web page with Firefox.:$
    iTunes Application Detector:$
    1
    0:application/itunes-plugin:::$
    libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so:$
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so:$
    :$
    1274279893000:1:5:$
    The <a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/totem/">Totem</a> 2.30.2 plugin handles video and audio streams.:$
    QuickTime Plug-in 7.6.6:$
    5
    0:video/quicktime:QuickTime video:mov:$
    1:video/mp4:MPEG-4 video:mp4:$
    2:image/x-macpaint:MacPaint Bitmap image:pntg:$
    3:image/x-quicktime:Macintosh Quickdraw/PICT drawing:pict, pict1, pict2:$
    4:video/x-m4v:MPEG-4 video:m4v:$
    libtotem-mully-plugin.so:$
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-mully-plugin.so:$
    :$
    1274279893000:1:5:$
    DivX Web Player version 1.4.0.233:$
    DivX® Web Player:$
    1
    0:video/divx:AVI video:divx:$
    libtotem-gmp-plugin.so:$
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-gmp-plugin.so:$
    :$
    1274279893000:1:5:$
    The <a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/totem/">Totem</a> 2.30.2 plugin handles video and audio streams.:$
    Windows Media Player Plug-in 10 (compatible; Totem):$
    13
    0:application/x-mplayer2:AVI video:avi, wma, wmv:$
    1:video/x-ms-asf-plugin:ASF video:asf, wmv:$
    2:video/x-msvideo:AVI video:asf, wmv:$
    3:video/x-ms-asf:ASF video:asf:$
    4:video/x-ms-wmv:Windows Media video:wmv:$
    5:video/x-wmv:Windows Media video:wmv:$
    6:video/x-ms-wvx:Windows Media video:wmv:$
    7:video/x-ms-wm:Windows Media video:wmv:$
    8:video/x-ms-wmp:Windows Media video:wmv:$
    9:application/x-ms-wms:Windows Media video:wms:$
    10:application/x-ms-wmp:Windows Media video:wmp:$
    11:application/asx:Microsoft ASX playlist:asx:$
    12:audio/x-ms-wma:Windows Media audio:wma:$
    libtotem-cone-plugin.so:$
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libtotem-cone-plugin.so:$
    :$
    1274279893000:1:5:$
    The <a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/totem/">Totem</a> 2.30.2 plugin handles video and audio streams.:$
    VLC Multimedia Plugin (compatible Totem 2.30.2):$
    19
    0:application/x-vlc-plugin:VLC Multimedia Plugin::$
    1:application/vlc:VLC Multimedia Plugin::$
    2:video/x-google-vlc-plugin:VLC Multimedia Plugin::$
    3:application/x-ogg:Ogg multimedia file:ogg:$
    4:application/ogg:Ogg multimedia file:ogg:$
    5:audio/ogg:Ogg Audio:oga:$
    6:audio/x-ogg:Ogg Audio:ogg:$
    7:video/ogg:Ogg Video:ogv:$
    8:video/x-ogg:Ogg Video:ogg:$
    9:application/annodex:Annodex exchange format:anx:$
    10:audio/annodex:Annodex Audio:axa:$
    11:video/annodex:Annodex Video:axv:$
    12:video/mpeg:MPEG video:mpg, mpeg, mpe:$
    13:audio/wav:WAV audio:wav:$
    14:audio/x-wav:WAV audio:wav:$
    15:audio/mpeg:MP3 audio:mp3:$
    16:application/x-nsv-vp3-mp3:NullSoft video:nsv:$
    17:video/flv:Flash video:flv:$
    18:application/x-totem-plugin:Totem Multimedia plugin::$
    nppdf.so:$
    /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/nppdf.so:$
    :$
    1295585662000:1:5:$
    The Adobe Reader plugin is used to enable viewing of PDF and FDF files from within the browser. :$
    Adobe Reader 9.4:$
    5
    0:application/pdf:Portable Document Format:pdf:$
    1:application/vnd.fdf:Acrobat Forms Data Format:fdf:$
    2:application/vnd.adobe.xfdf:XML Version of Acrobat Forms Data Format:xfdf:$
    3:application/vnd.adobe.xdp+xml:Acrobat XML Data Package:xdp:$
    4:application/vnd.adobe.xfd+xml:Adobe FormFlow99 Data File:xfd:$
    libflashplayer.so:$
    /home/john/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so:$
    :$
    1166154660000:1:5:$
    Shockwave Flash 9.0 r31:$
    Shockwave Flash:$
    2
    0:application/x-shockwave-flash:Shockwave Flash:swf:$
    1:application/futuresplash:FutureSplash Player:spl:$

    PROBLEM SOLVED. There were two versions of Flashplayer installed. I re-ran Flash Aid and it sorted the problem.
    Why does Adobe not resolve this problem at installation or upgrade time????

  • Why does Adobe believe Australians should pay more for software?

    Why does Adobe believe Australians should pay more for software?
    For Photoshop and premier elements bundle in the USA price is USD $119.99
    For Australia AUD $185.00 which at the current exchange rate of 1.067 is USD $173 or 44% more.
    Thanks Adobe.

    seeing its only a software download, then why should we have to pay $15 more for the same product? we already are charged extra for music now we're being slugged for software as well.... maybe an apple exec could give me a reason on this question...
    This is a peer-to-peer forum. If you want a response from Apple, you would have to contact them directly with such a question. A better question might be what are the direct and indirect duties and fees (Goods and Services Tax, Import Tax/Tariff, sales taxes, etc.) assessed by the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service and/or local tax agencies and/or municipalities for intellectual properties imported electronically. There may be quite a few agencies wanting a piece of your pie.

  • Why does adobe premier elements render my video everytime i change something in it even when i have lots more of the video to edit? other editing software only seems to render at the start then lets you edit until your ready to save at the end.  Constant

    why does adobe premier elements render my video everytime i change something in it even when i have lots more of the video to edit? other editing software only seems to render at the start then lets you edit until your ready to save at the end.  Constant rendering means its almost impossible to edit anything. Please help.

    H TheGamer
    What version of Premiere Elements and on what computer operating system is it running? It will not influence my answer but will give me information in case I need to get into version specifics to detail my answer further.
    Timeline rendering is a preview matter. It does not fix anything, but it is your window of opportunity to catch of problem sooner than latter. If the Timeline rendering indicator displays orange (11 or higher) for the line above the Timeline content, that is the project telling you that you are not getting the best possible preview of the playback of that content in the Edit area monitor. And, every time you edit a file, you have altered the file from the time before. So, if you want to see the best possible for what you now have, you Timeline render. This is particularly helpful when you are dealing with titles, effects, transitions, and non native formats. You cannot turn off the Timeline render indicator system, at least none that I have ever found nor seen reported. You can do selective Timeline rendering by having the gray tabs of the Work Area Bar span only the Timeline segment that you want Timeline rendered.
    Consequently, you either ignore the Timeline render indicator system, move on in the project, and take your chances in the outcome or you Timeline render to get your best possible preview if the Timeline render indicator is suggesting that you do so.
    I am not approving or disapproving of this project feature, just commenting on the what is.
    This is not Adobe. Rather user to user. If you want to have your voice heard at Adobe, you might consider filing an Adobe Feature Request Bug Report Form.
    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
    Please consider.
    ATR
    Add On...it is also possible to do Timeline rendering in a project, save close the project, and reopen it to find your previously "green" lined content now "orange", indicating unrendered. Yet the preview files generated originally by Timeline rendering are still existing in their hard drive save location. That is another story for other time.

  • Why does Adobe Reader do not print in English on my computer ?

    I go a e-mail from honeywell company with an attachment.  Why does Adobe Reader transform the e-mail from English to some other languge?

    Hi Margaret,
    I'd like to help! Would you mind sharing a bit more detail? What language does it appear to be? Has this happened with other PDF's? When you installed it - did you select English as the language?
    Looking forward to your response.
    Kind regards, Stacy

  • Can an employee download the free Adobe Reader onto a company PC without causing a license issue?

    Also what happens if a lot of the employees do the same?  Does this bring up license issues?

    Yes, the employee can download the free Adobe Reader onto a company computer without a license issue.
    BUT, the company computer would have to be configured such that this activity was permitted. Not all company computers are configured this way. The typical user profile is more restrictive than the user profile we have for the OS and applcations installs on our personal computers.
    Adobe provides a download of the installer on the Adobe.com site. Lotsa people use it to get Adobe Reader; so, no problem if all the employees at your place do it (IF the user profile on the computer permits it).
    Be well...

Maybe you are looking for