Why is Flash CPU usage so high on my PC?

To other psoters here - Please do not hijack my thread for any other performance issues with Flash other than high CPU usage.
This thread is (hopefully) dedicated to why the CPU usage on my desktop PC jumps when I go to a page with flash 'content'. Thank you!
I am hoping that there is an answer for why my computer is using a very high amount of CPU percentage when I am viewing flash content?
I am running Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 2 on a Gateway GT5432 desktop computer.
I have Shockwave Flash version 11.7.700.169 installed.
I am using Firefox version 20.0.1 (but I have seen same problem of high CPU with Google chrome).
Here is one page that is causing the high CPU usage.
- http://logansroadhouse.com/Default.aspx
That page appears to have lots of Flash content.
If I open that logans roadhouse page, my CPU usage goes from an average of 12%, to 80%!
The process I see jump are:
- Firefox's "plugin-container.exe" goes from 0% to about 50%
- Firefox browser "firefox.exe" goes from around 8% to 14%
- Adobe's plugin "FlashPlayerPlugin_11_7_700_169.exe" goes from 0% to 16%
- TOTAL CPU change from 8% to 80% after opening up just this one page !
When I close the page, the CPU usage goes down again. Open again - CPU goes high again.
Also if I go to the firefox addons page and DISABLE the SHOCKWAVE FLASH plugin, then go to that Logans Roadhouse page, very little of the content I saw with Flash enabled is visible - which I take to mean it is a page consisting of lots of Flash 'content'. Also the CPU usage remains low (8%) if I go to that page - after disabling the Shockwave Flash plugin.
I have seen the CPU also go high on youtube.com pages also - CPU jumps just as I said above - if Flash is enabled. CPU then drops after disabling Flash plugin.
I was hoping you had a fix for my problem? My PC becomes almost unusable with the CPU so high. It sure looks like it is the Flash plugin driving the CPU so high.

I am also facing the same problem from last 2-3 weeks since i upgraded my flash player to latest one.
All softwares and drivers are upto-date.
I play wartune MMO flash browser based game (also applicable to youtube videos) which is now using above 80% of CPU. Before upgrading, CPU usage was normal around 5-15% depending upon the events, but not more than 20% even if i open 3-4 accounts of wartune in different windows at the same time. It happens in all browsers (IE10, Mozila22.00, Opera12.15, Chrome27.0.1453.116 m).
I tried all solutions like disabling hardware acceleration, flash cache size to unlimited, clearing all flash cache etc but the same problem.
Please fix this problem as soon as possible.
My System Specs as follows
System
Manufacturer
System manufacturer
Model
System Product Name
Total amount of system memory
4.00 GB RAM
System type
64-bit operating system
Number of processor cores
2
Storage
Total size of hard disk(s)
307 GB
Disk partition (C:)
18 GB Free (40 GB Total)
Disk partition (D:)
28 GB Free (34 GB Total)
Disk partition (E:)
11 GB Free (58 GB Total)
Disk partition (F:)
4 GB Free (58 GB Total)
Disk partition (G:)
6 GB Free (116 GB Total)
Graphics
Display adapter type
Intel(R) G41 Express Chipset
Total available graphics memory
1759 MB
      Dedicated graphics memory
128 MB
      Dedicated system memory
0 MB
      Shared system memory
1631 MB
Display adapter driver version
8.15.10.2869
Primary monitor resolution
1440x900
DirectX version
DirectX 10
Network
Network Adapter
Realtek RTL8168D/8111D Family PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (NDIS 6.20)
OS Name
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
Version
6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601
Other OS Description
Not Available
OS Manufacturer
Microsoft Corporation
System Name
Y2K-PC
System Manufacturer
System manufacturer
System Model
System Product Name
System Type
x64-based PC
Processor
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU
E4500 @ 2.20GHz, 2203 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s)
BIOS Version/Date
American Megatrends Inc. 0702, 17-01-2011
SMBIOS Version
2.5
Windows Directory
C:\Windows
System Directory
C:\Windows\system32
Boot Device
\Device\HarddiskVolume1
Locale
India
Hardware Abstraction Layer
Version = "6.1.7601.17514"
User Name
y2k-PC\y2k
Time Zone
India Standard Time
Installed Physical Memory (RAM)
4.00 GB
Total Physical Memory
3.75 GB
Available Physical Memory
2.07 GB
Total Virtual Memory
7.49 GB
Available Virtual Memory
5.80 GB
Page File Space
3.75 GB
Page File
C:\pagefile.sys
Name
Intel(R) G41 Express Chipset
PNP Device ID
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2E32&SUBSYS_836D1043&REV_03\3&11583659&0&10
Adapter Type
Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family, Intel Corporation compatible
Adapter Description
Intel(R) G41 Express Chipset
Adapter RAM
1.75 GB (1,877,536,768 bytes)
Installed Drivers
igdumd64.dll,igd10umd64.dll,igdumdx32,igd10umd32
Driver Version
8.15.10.2869
INF File
oem6.inf (iEGL0 section)
Color Planes
Not Available
Color Table Entries
4294967296
Resolution
1440 x 900 x 59 hertz
Bits/Pixel
32
Memory Address
0xFE400000-0xFE7FFFFF
Memory Address
0xE0000000-0xEFFFFFFF
I/O Port
0x0000DC00-0x0000DC07
IRQ Channel
IRQ 4294967294
I/O Port
0x000003B0-0x000003BB
I/O Port
0x000003C0-0x000003DF
Memory Address
0xA0000-0xBFFFF
Driver
c:\windows\system32\drivers\igdkmd64.sys (8.15.10.2869, 10.14 MB (10,629,408 bytes), 14-11-2012 16:57)

Similar Messages

Satellite A45 - CPU usage is high and applications slow

Hi all,
I'm trying to debug a hardware problem on my Toshiba Satellite A45. I'm running Ubuntu 10.04, but I don't believe this is OS or software related.
THE PROBLEM: CPU usage is high and applications slow to a crawl after using a memory intensive application for a few minutes, i.e. viewing a video or playing a game. Basically, anything that might use the screen a lot. If instead I work only from a command prompt, even when the application might be doing a lot of work, I don't encounter this problem. After shutting down all application, CPU usage is still higher than normal (90% idle, should normally be about 99% idle).
Xorg typically now showing about 6% usage (normally < 2%). If I at any time after this try to work in any application, usage is still bogged down. Only a reset gets me back to normal.
Note: My system had always worked fine, and I had not done any software installation or changes when this started happening.
However, the laptop did go through an 800 mile round trip in the back of the car in a padded laptop bag.
DEBUG: This doesn't seem to be RAM as I have replaced RAM and reseated the RAM, and the problem still occurs. This doesn't seem to be the Hard Drive as I can try to run from a Live CD (no HDD usage) and everything still slows to a crawl.
HELP: I'm not sure how to debug from here.
I don't have extra bits of hardware to do swaps.
Any ideas how to further debug this?
Thanks,
Grommit

Hi grommit
What do You think about the possibility that your PC is becoming overheated?
To me this sounds like such a scenario.
Your using an application which is intensive - which makes the unit warm up a lot probably.
After that everything is sluggish. This is what may happen when cooling is not sufficient - the CPU is throttled to reduce heat generation. And the effect is that the unit works pretty slow.
May I suggest that You try to let the unit be off for some time before trying it again - I don't know your possibilities, but I would put it on the balcony or on the floor below an open window too cool it really much.
Then try again from whatever media you like.
The result? Good performance for a while again? Then either clean the cooling module yourself or have a repair workshop do this for You.
Good luck and stay with Linux! :)
BR Tom

CPU Usage is high - WebLogic Server 8.1 SP5

Hi,
We upgraded the WebLogic Server 6.1 to WebLogic Server 8.1 SP5 for one of our application.
The load test with WLS6.1 results,
CPU Usage was peak up to 18% with sessions 10 -15 simultaneously.
The load test with WLS8.1 results,
CPU Usage was peak up to 60% for 12 users simultaneously.
Why this higher CPU Usage in WebLogic 8.1 SP5 than WebLogic 6.1 for the similar environment (hardware)?
Please give us the solution or the suggestions asap.

If MQ V5 clients cannot interoperate with MQ V7 servers, then perhaps MQ V6 clients support the 1.4 JVM? If so, I suppose you can use an MQ V6 client to communicate with V7.
Alternatively, perhaps MQ's "extended transactional client" provides more flexibility in interoperability than the client you're using.
Tom

Why is the CPU usage different ? I used LOAD_BALANCE option.

I used a oracle 11.2.0.2 in RAC 2 nodes.
And I used LOAD_BALANCE option in the WAS pool configuration
jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=192.168.10.118)(PORT=1522))(*LOAD_BALANCE=YES*)(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=DEDICATED)(SERVICE_NAME=NOFFICE)))
But the CPU usage is different between two system. Usually it is 6:4, Sometimes it is 7:3.
Is it normal?
I want to a balance in CPU Usage (5:5).
If it is the better solution about a Load balance. i want to know it.

You are partially correct which is another way of saying you are incorrect too.
There are two types of load balancing ... server side and client side. There are also questions with respect to how the client is connecting, we don't know, whether the session load is identical, etc. which the OP has not stated.
The only thing I can absolutely say at this point is that what the OP has seen is normal and I can't see any reason why, unless the skew is very large and very permanent, anyone should care.
To the OP: Let's step back from the "what I want" statement and go to the basis of your inquiry: "Why do you care? Please provide a business reason and cite specific performance metrics, from your system, showing the problem you are trying to address. Then perhaps we can help you.

Curious - CPU usage sometimes high!

Sometimes (but not often) I'll notice my Q10 (with OS 10.2.1.3247) is warm and using battery faster than usual.
A check of the CPU usage shows the System as the user of the CPU with usage rate vascillating around 50%.
A reboot thus far has always remedied the anomaly.
. . . . Pete

Did you add any emails account recently or install anything new like media card?
Or did you do an os update recently?

Why isn't CPU usage maxed

I notice when I burn a project on iDVD the activity monitor shows the cpu usage btw 140 and 160% when encoding the video and like 30% when encoding the audio. I'm guessing if it showed 200% it would be utilizing all available processor power. Note my macbook has 2GB ram. This bothers me because the other day I encoded a video file that was 800MB that was 100 minutes and it took a little bit more than 4hrs to encode that. I didn't have anything else running? What gives?

It also really depends on what software you are using for the encoding. I've played with several the last couple of days and found out some interesting stuff. I used Toast 7.1 to encode a DVD into DivX for playback on a hardware DivX player. A one hour episode took 2 hours to encode using Toast (on my new MacPro). One processor was pegged, and the other three were basically idling. Today I used HandBrake to do the same exact task. This time that one hour episode encoded in 15 minutes. Watching Activity Monitor showed all four processors running at about 40% mostly in (nice) mode. The nice mode is good so that you can continue to use the computer for other tasks while it is working.
Obviously, it has a lot to do on the software. Both were Universal binaries, so I can't blame Toast's speed on Rosetta or anything else...

CPU usage very high, performance low

Using activity monitor, I gauge my cpu usage to be between 50 and 60 percent, with the Activity Monitor being THE ONLY APPLICATION OPEN! There are only two events which I can remotely correlate to this problem: downloading and using a new version of Firefox (3.07) and downloading and using Amadeus so I could listen to a Wiki file.
When I open Firefox or any other application, CPU usage goes straight to 100%. Then the machine slows down significantly. Any ideas?

You guys are not going to believe this! I did some searching where I discovered this comment by a user on MacRumors (sp?) named "cyantist:"
"For some reason I remember having this issue a while back, and the solution was this: right-click on the desktop > show view options > deselect show item info. It worked for me, but it wasn't Finder that was giving me 100% cpu, it was Safari or Camino."
Well, I couldn't really figure out what he had done but I right-clicked on the desktop>More>Configure Folder Actions> disable Folder Actions. Voila! Finder and mds dropped off the Activity Monitor list with percentages less than 1. Yikes! I did some experimentation and it turns out that all one has to do IS RIGHT-CLICK ON THE DESKTOP! At first, I thought it was toggling every time I selected and deselected "Enable Folder Actions," but doggone if the Finder and mds didn't drop off the map by simply right-clicking on the desktop. Bizarre! Now, with Activity Monitor and Firefox open, the cpu is running between 10% and 20%. Go figure! I'm not going to mark this problem as solved until someone chimes in with a reasonable explanation (which might come from . . . The Twilight Zone . . . )

CPU usage suspiciously high while idle

I have the following problem, help is very appreciated
Right after my computer finishes booting the CPU usage raises up to approx. 55% on both cores, I'll attach a screenshot to clarify.
What can be the cause of this?
To me, Xorg seems to be using more CPU than it needs.. still it's not 55%. The performance isn't bad either, the system works very well.
The screenshot http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/1811427/misc/idle.jpg
$ uname -a
Linux felipe-desktop 2.6.31-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Oct 6 00:48:55 CEST 2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7300 @ 2.66GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
$ top
top - 17:48:01 up 35 min, 3 users, load average: 0.28, 0.11, 0.08
Tasks: 107 total, 4 running, 103 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 35.9%us, 18.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 44.9%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 2057796k total, 840600k used, 1217196k free, 43768k buffers
Swap: 1020088k total, 0k used, 1020088k free, 344868k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1881 root 20 0 627m 42m 15m S 14 2.1 2:16.56 X
6263 felipe 20 0 40232 6136 2184 S 11 0.3 1:35.33 gconfd-2
6253 felipe 20 0 149m 7152 5516 R 4 0.3 0:40.75 gnome-session
14947 felipe 20 0 195m 34m 14m S 4 1.7 0:23.10 compiz
6259 felipe 20 0 11076 1524 820 S 3 0.1 0:34.75 dbus-daemon
7185 felipe 20 0 679m 121m 32m R 2 6.1 0:35.01 firefox
6267 felipe 20 0 215m 10m 7772 S 1 0.5 0:18.88 gnome-settings-
6285 felipe 20 0 399m 31m 20m S 1 1.6 0:10.30 nautilus
6323 felipe 20 0 162m 3044 1580 S 1 0.1 0:04.37 gnome-screensav
7592 felipe 20 0 197m 18m 11m S 1 0.9 0:06.89 gnome-terminal
6303 felipe 20 0 286m 36m 14m S 1 1.8 0:11.25 python
6284 felipe 20 0 229m 16m 11m S 1 0.8 0:11.05 gnome-panel
6273 felipe 20 0 36840 2080 1744 S 0 0.1 0:02.85 gvfsd
6311 felipe 20 0 145m 6792 5388 S 0 0.3 0:03.59 gdu-notificatio
6458 felipe 20 0 166m 8584 6368 S 0 0.4 0:04.06 notification-da
15615 felipe 20 0 324m 41m 18m S 0 2.0 0:03.91 gnome-do
1 root 20 0 3796 640 540 S 0 0.0 0:00.30 init
What else would be useful about my configuration?
Thanks in advance for any help

well well... looks like compiz WAS the problem after all... must've messed up while testing. So i 'found' a 'decent' workaround.
Deactivated compiz (set metacity as the WM) and removed compiz-icon from the startup applications, then i enabled metacity compositing (because i use both screenlets and docky)... and that's it, .. for now

Why is my CPU usage in quicktime on 10.5 so high compared to XP?

I have a 2.0 Ghz mac mini with the GMA950 and a windows XP machine at work with a 2.1 Ghz core 2 duo and the GMA950 also. When I play one quicktime HD movie I have on the mac it uses about 150-175% out of 200% of the cpu but when I play the same file on the XP machine it uses about 30% out of 200% Why is that since they both have the same GPU and almost the same CPU?
Message was edited by: nnickn
Message was edited by: nnickn

The answer is simple I'll tell you.
Because QuickTime for Windows doesn't need to consider much as it in Mac one, if you spent time on Windows you probably found it will crash other programs and even freeze the whole PC, because software in Windows doesn't care each other, they don't know each other, fine! But they don't CARE each other EITHER! That is what Windows all about! So the program can use less CPU power.
But QuickTime for Mac is quite different, QuickTime in Mac considers integrated operation. It will coordinate with other programs in Mac OS perfectly, so you can watch QuickTime movie in four space while click F8 simultaneous, something like that, you got what I mean? But you can NOT do that in any Windows system, not Windows 95/98/XP, even Windows Vista can NOT do that. Guess what? Only a Mac CAN do that.
So, who cares about the usage % of CPU? That's what a CPU born to be so.
Why bothered? You should be happy you have a Mac, not Windows, Windows will never learn its lesson. All you just forgot, Windows is just a complex fat boy copying Mac OS all the time!

Why is my data usage so high?

Using Verizon's data calculator, 5G should me more than sufficient for the limited PC usage. In one week, the data usage information indicates we have used over half in one week. There are several entries in the breakdown for small amounts during the midnight hours, when computers are not in use and shut down.
I am very disappointed with the information provided before this plan was purchased, based on what we expected for our data needs. By increasing the data amount our bill will increase 30.00 There are many sources that indicate 2G should be ample for each of us in the household (2). So, I am not sure the calculations are correct that are being tracked with the Jetpack system. Here is the data calculator, I entered more than twice the expected usage for the two laptops combined. We download no music, videos, movies. Simply check email and browse the web. How do you explain this?
Total
3 GB/mo
(3157 MB/mo)
Mobile
Broadband
4G
3 GB/mo
5/21/2014 Data Calculator - Verizon Wireless

The VZW Data Calculator is a tool designed to help estimate and visualize data usage. Most folks have no idea what data is or how it is consumed on their devices. The data calculator tool is not accurate on any front other than to give you a general idea how much data a particular function consumes under normal circumstances.
VZW provides its users with a limited data usage report that does not break down individual application or device usage into meaningful results. What you get instead is a power bill like summary of your usage in terms of how much was used at certain times of the day. After all VZW is not in the computer support business, they provide you with the pipe and users determine how best to consume the data. A leaky hose or application is not the responsibility of VZW to discover and correct.
When it comes to the actual usage of your VZW device there isn't a whole lot out there that can show you how you are consuming your data plan. Some monitor applications and devices can be setup ahead of time, but all they are good for is reviewing the data that flows through them. Special care must be taken when designing and setting up monitors to make sure you capture everything. Monitors are generally not user friendly to setup or understand and often require detailed readings of numerous logs to determine where problems are, if the monitor can even capture them at all.
The current best practices for data usage are as follows:
1. Power down your VZW device when it is not being used
2. Secure your VZW device with a custom SSID, WiFi and Admin password
- This should be in compliance with security best practices for strong passwords
- A good site to reference is https://howsecureismypassword.net/
3. Take care to disable and shutdown any automatic updates on your devices
4. Be cautious to view and download audio/video content on low resolution
In most cases high data usage is not an intentional doing on the users behalf. It is the background applications and services installed on the connected devices that run rampant and chew up your data plan without your knowledge or consent.

System CPU usage too high

Hi, i've been trying to troubleshoot this problem for some months.. everytime i try to use perfmon or another program to watch for network usage (download and upload) the System process spikes to 13%~ constantly until i close it.. I could "live"
without that but now everytime i'm using an application on my second monitor, the same thing happens... started happening just an hour ago, and it's really bothering me because i don't have a clue what driver could possibly cause this.
I've tried capturing xperf traces on another forum but they keep come as corrupted as the person whose trying to troubleshoot with me tells me, and i can't seem to get a grip of the xperf analyser myself to see what (driver?) is using the cpu so i can try
to replace it...
Anyway, as i type this it jumped up to 20% and i don't know what to do.
I'll upload two xperf traces here, but at least one is "corrupted" as the other kind member on the other forums told me. (which is the first one below)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36066558/highCPUUsage.7z
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36066558/highCPUUsage2.7z
And the one i just recorded, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36066558/highCPUUsage3.7z
Does someone have another way or can help me find what's causing it?
I used the command xperf -on latency -stackwalk profile -buffersize 1024 -MaxFile 512 -FileMode Circular && timeout -1 && xperf -d highCPUUsage.etl
I took a print of the System process Threads in Process Explorer http://i.imgur.com/vbW36rU.png
Before the today's change, the function shown there was mostly ntoskml.exe!KeGetCurrentProcessorNumberEx+0x34, i don't know if that means anything...
Thanks.

NTM
First Xperf has been replaced by Windows performance recorder. Second there was almost no data recorded in your trace. Please run a windows performance trace as instructed in the wiki and upload it. Make sure you run the trace when the
problem is happening
In order to diagnose your problem we need to run Windows performance toolkit the instructions for which can be found in
this wiki
If you have any questions feel free to ask
Please run the trace when you are experiencing the problem
Wanikiya and Dyami--Team Zigzag

Why is my memory usage so high?

This memory usage really shouldn't be okay, from having Chrome, Activity Monitor, Steam, and Skype running. I'm pretty sure the problem isn't that I don't have enough RAM. Does anything here look like is easily fixable?

Does anything here look like is easily fixable?
Nothing there looks like it needs to be fixed. Your memory usage is normal.

Why is airplay upload usage so high? (using wireless speaker)

I have a iHome wireless speaker that I play using iTunes Airplay. It works fine but the upload usage is through the roof compared to the download usage (e.g. upload = 128KB/s, download = 7KB/s) - this seems strange, thought it should be the other way around, what am I uploading? I've turned off all my iCloud settings, am not sending data back to Apple in iTunes so not sure what's going on - anyone else got any clues or knows how to fix this, it's chewing up my bandwidth usage big time.

Actually I figured it out - if you use the Apple Time Capsule as your internet server that seems to cause the upload usage, when I connected the speaker directly to the modem it is back to normal usage. Just thought I'd post this for anyone else who's had this issue.

Why is iTunes memory usage so high?

As the title states iTunes is using a riduclous amount of memory of my computer 150MB and continually rising until it freezes and then crashes. This is such a useless program and such a memory hog. Any ideas on how to reduce the stupid amount of RAM this program uses?

Close your iTunes,
Go to command Prompt -
(Win 7/Vista) - START/ALL PROGRAMS/ACCESSORIES, right mouse click "Command Prompt", choose "Run as Administrator".
(Win XP SP2 & above) - START/ALL PROGRAMS/ACCESSORIES/Command Prompt
In the "Command Prompt" screen, type in
netsh winsock reset
Hit "ENTER" key
Restart your computer.
Now launch your iTunes and see if it is working now.

High CPU usage when playing flv files with flash

As more and more FLV videos are moving to HD, I'm noticing
high CPU usage and lots of dropped frames when playing FLV video in
web browser with Flash 10. This is true even if the video isn't
full screen. I've tried a variety of browsers (Firefox, I.E.,
Chrome) and the problem occurs on all of them so it's pretty clear
it's a limitation in Flash.
Now my PC isn't high end (it has a Pentium M 1.86 GHz
processor), but I can take those same FLV files and load them in
something like Media Player Classic or Windows Media Player (when
using ffdshow) and play the FLV files full screen with little or no
drop in frames and an acceptable CPU rate.
This is especially annoying on sites like YouTube where I
actually have to save the video and play it back in something other
than Flash to have it play back at an acceptable rate. This doesn't
work for other sites like Amazon.
Why is the CPU usage so high when decoding and displaying
videos when compared to other media players?

I've been doing research about this excessively high CPU usage problem (100%!) for weeks because I have also experienced it with my vista home premium laptop. Just recently, I have finally found the solution. The problem is not your browser or your OS or your pc's memory. The problem is caused by authorization for flash player.
Read the link (posted below) carefully and follow the steps accordingly. If you have already done steps 1 through 6 with your computer, you can go straight to step 7.
http://thetechangel.com/blogberry/2008/10/adobe-flash-player-10-fix-for-vista-xp/
PS: I am not the author of that link, so please thank the respective site owner if you find the procedure very helpful.
Please let me know also if the link solves your problem. I am sharing this because Adobe seems unable to provide solutions to this, and I don't want to hear people suffer.
My blog:
http://literaryworks101.blogspot.com
http://bookofsalamat.blogspot.com
Thanks

Why is Flash CPU usage so high on my PC?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for