Why is it impossible to sort your images then post to web gallery - sorted?

I have been messing with Aperature for days and am really dis-enchanted. I have gone through and organized over 700 images in separate categories only to find #1 - when I try to upload the images in a Web Gallery or Web Journal the images cannot be uploaded from a Stack. #2 - if I unstack them first they all go back to the order of when they are uploaded. Also when using the sorting button - it is supposed to put them in order first to last or last to first...depending on which way the button is selected - This does NOT work everytime. Sometimes when you click on the button it does nothing to the order of a group.
THIS IS RIDICULOUS. There must be a way to organize your images in stacks and then upload in that same order - hello apple - are you listening?

hi.
"this is rediculous" — not quite. the problem may be your understanding of stacks. they're not groups. they're compilations of similar/near-identical photos, usually shot in rapid fire. the idea is that when you shoot several near-identical photos, you can easily 'group' them, sort them in terms of quality and then choose the best one (the 'Stack Pick') to represent the stack wherever it might be used.
for example, when I'm photographing a bird, I don't normally get a second chance to photograph the same bird in the same situation or pose. the depth of field is extremely short and focus can be difficult. camera shake may also affect my images. therefore, I typically take 8 or more photos of the same bird in the same place in less than 10 to 15 seconds (if the bird is kind enough to stay that long; they normally stick in one place for only 1 or 2 seconds). I will typically only need one of these, so I stack the images and choose the best one; i.e., the stack's Pick. I will rarely if ever have to look at the other photos in the stack again.
if you want to group images from an association point of view, don't use stacks. use albums. albums created within a project will allow you to do exactly what you hope to do. sorting and uploading multiple images from the same group will work. you can even sort manually.
"Also when using the sorting button - it is supposed to put them in order first to last or last to first...depending on which way the button is selected - This does NOT work everytime"
if you're using stacks, the Pick of the stack is used to represent the stack and is therefore used to sort the images in your collection; ie, the position of the whole stack in your collection of images is determined by the Pick of the stack.

Similar Messages

  • Image quality bad in Web Gallery

    I used the .Mac web gallery feature for the first time yesterday with images that I had edited in Lightroom and then exported to iPhoto for upload, I chose the jpeg compression at highest quality (they were RAW files taken with my Canon 40D) and saved as sRGB optimized for the web. The thumbnails look fine, but the images look absolutely horrible full screen...focus looks blurry and artifacts in some of the shots. Granted, I'm viewing on my 24" screen and it does look better on my other half's 13" MacBook, but still...the image quality should not suffer like this. I can't believe Apple would release a product the renders such poor quality photos.
    Is there something that I'm missing here? Is anyone else noticing this with their web galleries?

    Dave:
    You can replace the 800 x 600 files with your full sized image files. But it would be a manual operation. Each photo in an web gallery has it's own folder with several versions of the file in it. They are located in the iDisk/Sites/Web/_gallery folder. The file titled web.jpg is used for the slideshow. If you replace it with the original file that's been renamed web.jpg, it will be the one used to display in the slideshow.
    HOWEVER, the full sized image file takes a very long time to load when playing the slideshow. If you do that you should use an image resizing application like Resize! to reduce the file size by selecting a higher jpeg compression ( lower quality level) while keeping the pixel dimensions the same. With a 60% quality level and keeping the pixel dimensions the same I reduced a 2816 x 2112 pixel, 2.11 MB image file to 695 KB. The 2.1 MB file took 6 seconds to load, the 695 took 2 seconds and the iPhoto produced file were nearly instantaneous. Resizing down wot 1200 x 900 at 60% reduced the size down to 132 KB, much more manageable for loading and rendering online.
    So you would have to test to see what pixel dimension and quality level would work best for you. But keep in mind that you'd have to manually change each file, rename it to web.jpg and copy up to the iDisk.
    Do you Twango?
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 08 libraries and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

  • How do I change filename for single-image HTML pages in web gallery for LR 3

    Hi,
    I would like to change the default filename for the HTML pages produced by Lightroom 3 in the web gallery. Specifically, I would like to remove the string "_large" from the HTML filename, so it corresponds exactly to the image filename.
    Specifically, the URL by default is like this:
    http://www.mysite.com/content/_c_EMT2146_large.html
    and I would like it to be like this
    http://www.mysite.com/content/_c_EMT2146.html
    I assume there is some way to make this change using the template editors, but I can't figure it out.
    thanks,
    James Riemermann

    Turns out there's a fairly easy way to change that on Windows, but I can't figure out an equivalent on a Mac, which is where the need is. On windows, I can edit (after backing up) the following two config files:
    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.6\Shared\webengines\default_html.lrwebengine\grid.html
    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.6\Shared\webengines\default_html.lrwebengine\manifest.lrweb
    In which the "_large" string is appended and can be removed, following which the gallery works exactly as I would hope.
    But I can't find the equivalent files on the Mac, though I would assume they exist.

  • Anyone see changes in images when making a web gallery through Adobe Bridge cs4??? Please Help!

    When creating web galleries through adobe bridge CS4 the final gallery images become very orange.....
    Not even comparable to what we are  seeing in Bridge or Photoshop CS4....
    Adobe tells me that this is happening because of the conversion for web use.
    We are just noticing this change now and feel that there is a problem somewhere.....
    Has anyone else seen this issue or now anything to do to get it fixed???
    It's really annoying, Please Help!!!

    You probably want to ask this in the Bridge forum. From what I know, Bridge converts the profile to sRGB which helps avoids big color shifts if you view the images in an uncolormanaged web browser. This may change the appearance slightly, but there shouldn't be a huge shift.

  • More images in adobe bridge web gallery

    Hi there
    Does any one know how to load more than ten images into the adobe bridge automated web gallery??
    in Bridge CS4
    or is ten just the limit?
    thanks alot

    You'd be best off posting in the Adobe Bridge forum.

  • Aperture 2.1 only loads 100 images per album to web gallery

    The web gallery project on Aperture contains 199 images but only the first 100 loaded. What gives? I've loaded albums before from iPhoto and didn't seem to have this problem, or if I did I never noticed it.
    Thanks,
    Mike T.

    Aperture 2.1.4 is unsupported on OS X Mavericks and there are known issues that have been reported here.
    I think you can roll back to an older OS X version (Snow Leopard?) or pay the $79.00 to upgrade to Aperture 3.5.1.

  • Why do have a long default Subject when sending picture to Web Gallery?

    Why does Apple populate a long default Subject when sending a picture to Web Gallery? This is extremely annoying as the long Subject has to be deleted for each picture (Subject becomes the Pictures' caption in the Gallery) before entering a desired Caption.
    Why not just leave the default Subject blank so we can add what we want? I have submitted this as both an enhancement and bug request to online Apple support. Just wanted to call it to others attention in case their was a workaround or so others could also submit it to support.
    Not very user friendly having to tap 20+ delete keys before entering a Caption for each picture....

    Just keep the delete key pressed down. It's faster.

  • So creative have you sorted your drivers out yet. better Let Daniel_k sort them for you

    I cant beli've how many people are complaining about this x-fi card. I have returned the card 2 times so far.. I either get a full c freeze or a freeze with a very high pitch noise in the speakers..
    I have done everything there is to do.. installing the new updated drivers all teh way down too a full format.. some thing really must hadt teh x-fi card for there too be so much trouble
    it also seems to me that there must be a conflict with asus and x-fi cards. if so Come guys sort this out..
    I am sorry if this has been sorted is so post us a link too the fix other wise else this is really p**ing me off, about time things got sorted out..

    About the stuttering issues, you must contact Auzentech and/or post the issue in their forums.
    That is a more complex driver issue I cannot fix as I don't have the source code nor the time to disassembly the driver to figure out what is wrong.
    Regarding the decoding, only Creative can add this feature to the Prelude because it works in UAA mode in Windows 7 / Vista and also has a special design, make it more difficult to "mod" the driver.

  • How can I protect Images in a Lightroom Web Gallery?

    I'm creating photo galleries using the Web tab in Lightroom. It generates the html pages and work nicely in my website, but I need to secure those images to prevent them from being copied or downloaded. In the current versions, one can simply click and drag an image to the desktop or right-click and copy. Is there an option to secure those images when generating the webpages?

    There is no option for this in the "simple html" gallery. If you are comfortable doing your own web programming, you can add a javascript function to prevent right-click saving. Unfortunately, this is just a speed bump. If you can see it, you can steal it.
    If you went with the flash gallery, the right-click protection is built in. I have never been a fan of flash galleries.
    Realistically your easiest defense is to only put small-size images on the web.

  • How to add title/caption to each image in Bridge web gallery

    Hi,
    I am creating a web gallery within Bridge and I want to add a title and caption to each image in my web gallery. How do I do that? The only thing I see is the Site Info. section and that adds a title and caption to the entire web gallery (including each image) and I want different titles and captions for each image. There must be a simple way to do this I just haven't figured it out yet. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
    ashmic19

    Thanks Curt Y for your help. The thing is I have to use only Bridge. I looked up this problem on http://www.experts-exchange.com/ and they said it was not possible to add titles and captions for individual images (slides) in a web gallery in Bridge. They seemed to imply that this was overlooked. So I input what I could based on what was provided by Bridge and turned it in. Thanks to all who viewed and replied to this post. I appreciate it.
    ashmic19

  • Web Gallery: image adjustments during creation of web gallery?

    I've noticed that when my images get uploaded to a web gallery, they look very different: it looks like they've been gamma'ed up, desaturated and had sharpening applied. It's quite a significant difference and it don't look good. I checked to see if it was a standard mac/pc gamma correction going on, but it didn't seem like it.
    Any thoughts on why this is happening and what I can do to stop it?
    thanks,

    I just did some digging and it seems that this washing out only happens on images that I've edited, but the way the image appears in the web gallery is WAY different than the way it appears in my iPhoto library. Perhaps when it's creating the image for the web gallery it's just not making my edits accurately?
    Any thoughts on how to fix it? It's such a bummer.

  • Any way to keep original file name as image name for web gallery?

    Hi,
    I wonder if there is any way to keep the original file name as image name for a web gallery (instead of "picture-1.jpg)
    People often send us the thumbnails or the image from the web and we have to search forever to find the image in AP - if we could keep our original filename then this would be a second away.
    Hope somebody has an idea
    thanks

    Hi William,
    I finally had time to play - unfortunately it does
    not work the way you described above.
    I´m just exporting a set of images using the "Stock
    Black" Theme - marked name only - batched the
    filename to masterfile - but the actual picture names
    are still "picture-1.jpg" - "picture-2.jpg".
    did I miss anything? thanks
    I see what you want, you don't care about the screen name so much but want the generated file names to be the same as the version names. From earlier messages though I am not quite sure why this is a problem, since you said other people were picking the images they wanted - say Image1 and 23 and 8. That to me says those people are going through the directory using Finder or Explorer, not using the HTML.
    Is it the case you are giving people web galleries on CD? If so, then perhaps also export a "browse" directory with exported images using the version names, so that people can use the right name.
    Or perhaps it's the case that people are downloading the images from the web, and then using the downloaded file names to send you requests. I'm not sure how to fix this yet and do not know if 1.1 offers something for this.

  • Help- how do I make images ready for web gallery??

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a photo gallery of images within Bridge using the Adobe Web Gallery feature. I have the images I want to use in a folder.What steps do I need to take to get the images saved in the correct format and file size? Also, what files sizes do you recommend for a web gallery? I need to make medium to large thumbnails & large images (when clicked). Here's what I am thinking I need in terms of getting this right:
    use Adobe Photoshop/Bridge to create the gallery
    jpg for photos
    gif for solid colors
    file size under 2MB (full image), under 20-30K for (thumbnails), total size of all images under 50K (no more than 50 sec. to download)
    screen size: 984x728
    screen resolution: 72dpi
    If you could help me in any way, shape or form concerning making my images ready for a web gallery that would be most helpful. And if you can refer me to any resources on making a web gallery that'd be awesome. Thank you!
    ashmic19

    Thanks for the link Curt Y that video is really helpful. After looking through some materials I had I figured out how to optimize my images. So I don't need any help anymore. But thanks to all who viewed this and thanks Curt Y for the video!
    ashmic19

  • Adding Images to Web Gallery

    After my Web Gallery is uploaded and I get additional images from subsequent shoots, I'd like to import and add them to the slideshow, then to the Web Gallery without having to re-type the Web Gallery info into the boxes again. Any way to accomplish this would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks!

    Only if you use a separate FTP Client and just overwrite the originals with the Sharpened ones. Make sure you are replacing the correct ones or doing them all. Most Galleries from LR generate two or three Sizes.
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 2Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.5.1 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D See LR Links list at http://donricklin.blogspot.com for related sites.

  • [web] is it possible to manipulate the file names of images from a web gallery?

    Hi,
    I am new here so please forgive my dumb questions....
    I would like the resulting images in my web gallery to have sequential filenames (ie 1.jpg, 2.jpg etc)
    Is this possible and could you give me some clues how I might approach this?
    Thanks!
    Steve

    You can't rename the actual files from Web as they export. There's nothing in the SDK on it either.
    Lightroom does change the naming to make it websage. For example, spaces are turned into underscores.
    If you need sequential files, I'd suggest getting the files in order, then exporting the files as highest quality Jpeg with a sequential naming system.
    Click the Add to Catalog checkbox, and perhaps use 'The same folder' and then use a subfolder for organistion.
    Use these new images to create the web gallery.

Maybe you are looking for