Why is the advertising mandatory?

On the top of every email I send with Adobe Idea, the program automatically inserts
Created using Adobe® Ideas
http://www.adobe.com/products/adobeideas
I cannot find a way to deactivate this and its really frusturating. It makes the whole thing so commercial and ugly. Manually deleting it every time is such a hassle and it has really turned me off from the whole product.
There are also lines that show up above and below the image on the left hand side of the email. Why is this happening?
Is there a way around these detractors?
Josh

I checked into this for you. The only way to remove is manually like you have been.

Similar Messages

  • Firefox don't play video from diferent sites like hulu, cnet, cbs, abc, etc. Only play the advertising. WHY?

    I try this why chrome and IE and work perfect, but whit Firefox only play the advertising.
    I try restore point at my computer. Don't work.
    I try reinstalling Firefox. Don't work.
    That is my only problem. For the rest Firefox work just find.

    I have to correct something.  With type="video/quicktime", Safari 7.0.1 does play the QuickTime VR Panorama, so it's effective for both QuickTime videos and panoramas.  But, what I wrote about Firefox and Chrome hasn't changed.
    I did get the QuickTIme with a "?" symbol when I tried to play it with Safari 7.0.1, before submitting the question; but maybe that was a side effect of an earlier attempt.

  • Why is cost charged to me £8.78 when the advertised cost is £7.15 plus Tax which equals £8.56?

    Why is cost charged to me £8.78 when the advertised cost is £7.15 plus Tax which equals £8.56?

    Please check the invoice & the percentage of tax deducted.
    Please refer to :
    Adobe Store | Online order and payment FAQ
    Place a tax-exempt order with Adobe
    In case of discrepancy, you can contact Adobe Support or message me in private.
    Regards
    Rajshree

  • Why is it that my ABP does not block the advertisements?

    Why is it that my ABP does not block the advertisements?.. because it did not work I removed Firefox.. then downloaded a new one.. which came with a ABP.. I thought it would work but it doesn't work some one suggested some kind of subscription and where to find it but it was not there.. please help me if you can.. I had my fill of the adds that I do not want. thanks for any help Stan.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == whithin the last three weeks

    Most likely you are not getting the default filter subscription which recently switched to being hosted over https
    Here's the related blog which also has the solution:
    http://adblockplus.org/blog/how-do-users-end-up-with-a-misconfigured-certificate-store

  • I was wondering how the advertised 10G multiple line plan that is running now is different from my current plan. Basically, why am I paying more now for 4G of data when Verizon is saying I can get 10 for the same price basically.

    NM

    Most of the advertisements running now are for Edge. You get discounts for having a smart phone on Edge based on the data package you have. What sucks is that most of the time they advertise a certain price for the monthly service and that is true but what they don't say is you add the Edge payments to that and most of the time it is around the same price as without Edge.
    If you think about this though, say you get a phone that is $24.99/month with Edge and you share 10GB which gives you a $25 discount, the phone is basically free and nothing is due at checkout. If you get a 2 year contract with that phone you pay the 2 year price of the phone and pay the same amount monthly.

  • The opt out option does not stop the advertising..Why not????

    cant stop the advertising which is very annoying. Every time i try to go to one of my favorites the ads keep popping up first. I have to delete them in order to get to the site i wanted.

    Some 'bad' companies don't process op-outs.
    Go to the
    '''''[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/ Mozilla Add-ons Web Page]'''''
    (There’s a lot of good stuff here)
    and look for add / pop-up blockers. There are also site blockers.

  • MacBook Pro retina 13" (late 2013, Haswell) why is the highest resolution rendered in 3360x2100, which the system obviously can't handle?!

    Hey Apple and Apple users,
    I just recently switched from an MacBook Air (mid 2013) to the new Haswell MacBook Pro retina 13" (late 2013 model).
    The main reason to do so was the better screen and the option to run higher scaled resolutions, as advertised.
    I was willing to trade in the Air's low weight, smaller formfactor and the extra batterylife for the better screen.
    When it comes to resolutions:
    1280x800 is just a joke nowadays, why is the MacBook Pro still based on it? 13" and 1440x900 work quite fine...see MacBook Air.
    1440x900 is okay in everyday life situations, but sometimes you just need "more space" as the third scaling option calls it as well in the display-settings.
    1680x1050 on 13" can sometimes be challenging, but it is really fine if you need to work and have a lot UI elements to deal with (Photoshop etc.)
    So 1680x1050 scaled on the 2560x1600 screen would be my daily driver for work. So I expected a scaling factor of "1.5238..." (2560/1680) will be used most of the time.
    Frankly spoken...I am really disappointed by the 13" retina MacBook Pro and the way OS X Mavericks is handling the scaling.
    It obiously works well and responsive with the 1280x800 non-scaling resolution ("best for retina, scaling factor 2: 1280 --> 2560).
    Is still "okay-snappy" at 1440x900 (scaling factor 1.777...: 1440 --> 2560).
    But it totally breaks down at 1680x1050 (scaling factor 1.523...: 1680 --> 2560).
    I use "Mission Control" all the time and it is stuttering and slow...overall a sluggish and unbearable experience.
    The same goes for Desktop-Switching by swiping the screens or resizing and moving windows and files around.
    So I was wondering why...and then I noticed that when taking a screenshot of my entire screen (CMD + 3) the image size of the screenshot was 3360x2100 and not the expected 2560x1600.
    This means Mavericks is not scaling the UI with the appropriate factor (see above). For retina MacBooks it ist simply rendering one pixel of the classic, non-retina Interface in now 4 pixels (2x2) and sending this straight to the screen, which then "scales" it down to the resolution it is able to display.
    Why is this bothering me? – Because the machine has to do a lot more work to render the higher resolution that can't even be displayed, due to the screens limitations.
    2560x1600 = 4096000 pixels = 100%
    3360x2100 = 7056000 pixels = 172%
    This means the MacBook has to render 72% more information than actually can be displayed on the built-in screen and are just lost.
    Of course this makes the overall UI feel sluggish and idly! Especially with the not that performant Intel Iris IGP and no dedicated graphics card.
    All this extra "rendering" just results in a worse battery life due to the extra work that the graphics card and CPU have to do.
    First, Apple...are you serious about this?
    What can we do about this?
    Is there a way to have this properly scaled?
    Thanks in advance to everyone.

    Okay...I thought deeply about this issue.
    Even looking into ways to maybe fixing this on the software side. But it occured to me that this is to deeply embedded into the system that it won't be possbile to come up with a sufficient third-party solution.taht
    The problem is that there is no intermediate step inbetween "standard DPI" graphics and "HiDPI" (image-resources named "[email protected]").
    But there should be one, to minimize the amount of image information that needs to be processed by the device.
    This effects especially the MacBook Pro retina 13", as it has the less powerful Intel Iris IGP, when performing on the highest scaled resolution (equivalent to 1650x1080).
    As well as the MacBook Pro retina 15" without a dedicated, second Graphics Unit,when performing on the highest possible scaled resolution (equivalent to 1920x1200).
    Those devices don't have enough resources to handle the consequential "HiDPI" resolutions of 3360x2100 for the 13" and 3840x2400 for the 15" model.
    (Comment: 3840x2400 = 9,2MP, which is more than the standard 4K resolution of 3840x2160.
    I analyzed the scaling factors as follows:
    Factor "2" to display 1280x800 on the 13" model and 1440x900 on the 15" model in HiDPI.
    Factor "1.777..." would be required to display 1440x900 on the 2560x1600 screen of the 13" model.
    Factor "1.714..." would be required to display 1650x1080 on the 2880x1800 screen of the 15" model.
    Factor "1.523..." would be required to display 1650x1080 on the 2560x1600 screen of the 13" model.
    Factor "1.5" would be required to display 1920x1200 on the 2800x1800 screen of the 15" model.
    As all the models seem to have no problem with rendering the intermediate scaling step (1440x900 for the 13" and 1680x1050 for the 15" model) at HiDPI, hence with the scaling factor 2. There is no real need to provide the UI-elements.
    But in my opinion there is a strong need for a "MidDPI" ([email protected]) intermediate step for all the UI graphic elements that wis based on the scaling factor 1.5.
    This would result in the following:
    13" MacBook Pro retina with 2560x1600 screen:
    1280x 800 @ 2x = 2560x1600 (no surplus, native screen resolution)
    1440x 900 @ 2x = 2880x1800 (the surplus of 1088000px = ~1MP can still be handled and compansated by the weak Iris IGP)
    1680x1050 @ 2x = 3360x2100 (the surplus of 2960000px = ~3MP is too much for the weak Iris IGP)
    NEW 1680x1050 @ 1.5x = 2520x1575 (with a small border of left=20px, bottom=13, right=20, top=12 pixels, which means ~2,2mm and ~1.3mm around the 1.5x scaled image!).
    15" MacBook Pro retina with 2880x1800 screen:
    1440x900 @ 2x = 2880x1800 (no surplus, native screen resolution)
    1680x1050 @ 2x = 3360x2100 (the surplus of 1872000px = ~2MP can still be handled by the Iris Pro IGP)
    1920x1200 @ 2x = 3840x2400 (the surplus of 4032000px = ~4MP can't be handled sufficiently by the Iris Pro IGP)
    NEW 1920x1200 @ 1.5x = 2800x1800 (nu surplus, native screen resolution, no border needed!)
    The big advantage is that all the graphics have already been remodeled for the HiDPI mode.
    So scaling those "factor 2x" images down to "factor 1.5x" should be comparably easy!
    Example:
    Left: Traditional "standard DPI" icon of "all my files".
    Right: "@2x.png" for the "HiDPI" modes.
    Middle: "@1.5x.png" suggestions for the "MidDPI" mode; easily scaled down from the lovely HiDPI graphics.
    With this simple introduction of the "MidDPI" modes a significant amount of processing power can be saved.
    This not only improves battery life when driving those higher scaled resolutions, but also lets the user access those resources for what really matters: processing power for the primary job that the Mac needs to get done.
    Thanks in advance.

  • Going to itunes store on xp, it won't go past the window for the advertisement for itunes 10

    When accessing the Itunes store, it loads to the advertisement page of Itunes 10, I don't want to download Itunes 10, but it doesn't give me that option.  I just used the store a few weeks ago.  I don't understand why I can't now.  My operating system is XP..have't had this problem before.  I did have a problem last time, but worked around it..that was:  I couldn't access the store from the "store" on the left side of my Itunes, but had to go to the top and access it from there.  Any help you can give me would be greatly aprreciated.  Note:  I haven't added new products or anything since last time I used it.

    Depending upon what country that you are in (music can't be re-downloaded in all countries) then try deleting that track from your iTunes library and redownload it via the Purchased link under Quicklinks on the right-hand side of the iTunes store home page on your computer's iTunes.
    If you aren't in a country where you can re-download music or if it re-downloads in the same state then try the 'report a problem' page to contact iTunes Support : http://reportaproblem.apple.com
    If the 'report a problem' link doesn't work then you can try contacting iTunes Support via this page : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page, then Purchases, Billing & Redemption

  • Why is the Fios mobile app not available in the App Store?

    Why is the Fios mobile app not available in the App Store?

    Sorry to say but they have. And even advertised it on their home page as recently as today. You can view about 70 different channels on your iPhone or iPad. Anyone else out there who knows the answer?

  • Why does the iphone say it has 16 gb but when i plug it in it shows 26.2 gb with only a capacity of 13.4gb?

    ok guys i have done my fair share of reading and i am so lost. on my box it says i have a 16 gig iphone 4 verizon white. my question is everytime i plug my phone in it pops up with a little tiny AutoRun icon and i hit open files. well it shows that i have 13.4gb of 26.2gb. but in iTunes it only shows my phone with 13.4 with 12 available for apps and music. why is it that my phone realy has 26 gigs and i can only access half of that?
    Is my phone realy using 13gb just for software? that is way to much for me. any body else see this, what about any fixs or what not?

    There's no way a 16GB model phone has more than than capacity.  I have no idea what you mean by AutoRun icon.  Is that an app you downloaded?  Did you jailbreak?
    The "advertised" capacity of all storage devices is based on a decimal definition of "Gigabytes" where 1 GB is defined as 1,000,000,000 bytes.  However computers see and calculate storage based on binary definitions where 1 GB = 1,073 742,824 bytes.  Thus a 16 GB "decimal" device is only 14.9 real, binary gigabytes.
    Also, there are additional loses due to formatting overhead and the iOS.  RAM memory is separate and not used from the supplied flash disk.

  • Why does the "mute" button not "mute" the new iPad?

    Hi,
    the problem drives us crazy.
    We bought the new iPad on launch Day and every other App (like Hotel Dash) does play Sounds even though the iPad is muted. Really anoying are "between Level" Ads or "pause Ads" (like in Wedding Dash, Lost Luxuries) which started playing while my wife was in the Subway.
    The mute Button should turn the iPad to mute without exceptions. How can we fix it? Or do we have to return the new iPad?
    Regards
    Tim

    Tim W. (Germany) wrote:
    Thanks for your Reply. The Problem is, we are not listing to Music or watching an Movie - we are using an App, which plays Advertisement.
    Game Sounds do not play at all, but the Advertisement is playing at full Volume. This should not happen.
    Ok it is "not a bug it's a feature" or just abuse by App Developers, which i have no controll over? I have to use the volume rocker all the time? Why put a "mute" button on an iPad?
    As you were told, the mute button mutes system sounds.  Other sounds are muted via the rocker.  That's the way it is.

  • Why Division is not Mandatory in CRM

    Hi ,
    I am new to CRM...I am working in SD.
    Just want to know why division is not mandatory in CRM like in SD.
    Thanks for your time
    RamaChandra

    Hi Ramachandra,
    In CRM, mainly the relationship between tables is built based on GUID field. So in order to extract the data from tables we will use the GUID field as key field. So it's not necessary to have remaining fields as key fields.
    You can go through the tables structure and you will be able to understand.
    Thanks,
    Lakshmi P

  • Why are the ipad 2 cameras so poor?

    i received an ipad 2 as a gift nearly a year ago and have a quick question. why is the camera so, well, unusable? are there any plans on upgrades? i figured that this would be one of the ever-advertised features, but my 6 year old phone takes better pictures -literally!  does anyone know the reasoning behind this? it's incredibly inconvenient as much of my online social functioning is through my ipad.
    thanks for any answers, -Daniel.

    The cameras in the iPad are there primarily to support the FaceTime and PhotoBooth functions.
    The iPad is really too large to be used conveniently as a point-and-shoot camera.
    As far as upgrades go, there's bound to be another iPad and specifcations are never lower than what has already been, but don't expect optics as good as a dedicated camera phone such as the iPhone 4S.

  • Why does the Firefox application stay open in the background when I close it?

    I have a WN XP PRO desktop and a WN 7 Pro laptop. Every grade of Firefox has the same problen of staying open in the background at times. I have always had to restart my computers to clear it. Why can't this problem be fixed? I see that others are having the same problem. The only time that I know that it hasn't shut down is when I try opening it up. It may be running when I am using IE or Google. It has to be slowing my computers down.

    There's no way a 16GB model phone has more than than capacity.  I have no idea what you mean by AutoRun icon.  Is that an app you downloaded?  Did you jailbreak?
    The "advertised" capacity of all storage devices is based on a decimal definition of "Gigabytes" where 1 GB is defined as 1,000,000,000 bytes.  However computers see and calculate storage based on binary definitions where 1 GB = 1,073 742,824 bytes.  Thus a 16 GB "decimal" device is only 14.9 real, binary gigabytes.
    Also, there are additional loses due to formatting overhead and the iOS.  RAM memory is separate and not used from the supplied flash disk.

  • Why is the contents of Safari's downloads folder different than the actual folder?

    Why is the contents of Safari's downloads folder different than the actual folder that resides in my users folder?

    Problem is if I delete that .plist I'll delete those downloads.  I'm still able to launch those downloads from that location so that tells that file is probably not corrupted. I need to be able to located that folder and transfer the downloads from it before I do anything like this.  So that begs the question, where is that folder located?  When I do a folder search I'm taken to a Downloads folder, but it's not the one that is showing up from within Safari as it's contents are too different. 

Maybe you are looking for