Why is the CS6 install PKG so slow?

Ok so I can't use the clone solution anymore (without creating a serialization file etc.,) which we used to deploy using Casper.
So using the 3.1 enterprise deployment tool I have created the install pkg, and loaded it to Casper Admin and ran an install and gave up after 40mins. Checked and made sure I was installing over AFP not SMB and gave up again after 40 mins and CS6 is still not installed.
Today I rebuilt the pkg, to ensure I hadn't made any obvious errors, and decided to test it over ARD to see whether I had made a mistake in Casper. So far as with Casper remote, ARD hits 95% in around 10 mins then starts to slow down and has now been chundering on 97% for 35 mins so far 'running package scripts'.
Up till CS6 we have been imaging a fully installed and configured Mac (including all software, CS5, Office, Fetch, Citrix etc, drivers and printers) at a users desk or in the workshop in 20 to 25 mins from netboot depending on how busy our network or servers are.
Installing CS6 over ARD has just completed in 45 mins (and I will now transfer the pkg to Casper), this is exactly the reason I switched to cloning a configured HD in the first place.
So now I have to inform our users (and 'the business') that our plans to rollout CS6 will take over twice as long and we may now need to find the resources to rollout 'out of hours' instead of re imaging divsions/depts while they are in their weekly meetings as we have done with every version so far. I'm afraid our users have been used to going to a meeting or lunch, returning and logging straight in and working, this will no longer be an option.
...Arrrrgh, rant over.
Cheers
Phil

Hi,
You can still use imaging with AAMEE 3.1. You just have to create the master machine (whosse image will be taken) by deploying an AAMEE 3.1 created package. So create a serialized package using AAMEE 3.1 (using 1st option of AAMEE 3.1) (not possible with AAMEE 3.0). Deploy this serialized package on the master machine. Once your master machine is successfully created, take its image and deploy it on the client machines and Adobe products will be succussfully installed and serialized on client machines. Hope this reduces your problems. There is no need to create a seperate serialization file with AAMEE 3.1.
Having said that, the time taken for an AAMEE created package to deploy should be approximately the same as taken to deploy master collection directly. I agree that the progress shown on the installer is not correct as it is a native progress (not controlled by us), but typically complete CS6 master collection may take some time to complete. Is your master collection media kept on some remote network location?? In that case the time can vary significantly based on the speed of your network. Even on the same machine, the time may vary based on CPU utilization and various other factors.
Thanks,
Saransh Katariya | Adobe Systems | [email protected]

Similar Messages

  • HT4528 Why is the WiFi and browser so slow on iPhone 5?

    Why is the WiFi and browser so slow on iPhone 5?  I've noticed they are not as quick as other smart phones and have seen this brought up in forums.  Also, the WiFi was slow with my iPhone 4 anyone know what the deal is?
    Thanks in advance

    Sadly that spiffy reply was of no use.  Browser is so slow and in looking at 3 different iPhones I have noticed there is a serious wait for any simple page to come up like MSN maybe its the iOS maybe Safari maybe should reset daily.  Truly not impressed Apple can you here us now?  Probably not... to busy restarting or resetting.
    Truly hope it improves in a hurry.

  • Why is the download/upload speed so slow on my MBA (about 5 times slower than my PC)?

    Why is the download/upload speed so slow on my MBA (about 5 times slower than my PC)?

    Are you on band 13 or band 4?  13 is the original LTE band and remains relatively congested. Band 4 is the XLTE band and is less congested and has higher overall potential bandwidth (15 MHz vs 10 MHz). Even so, 7 Mbps is more than enough for doing stuff on your phone and is not considered slow. 
    To check band,
    dial *3001#12345#*
    select serving cell info
    frequency band will say 13 or 4
    FInd an area with band 4 and retest. 

  • Why is the same wirelles connection too slow for an iphone4 when it is quite fast to an iphone5?

    Why is the same wirelles connection too slow for an iphone4 when it is quite fast to an iphone5?

    You really have a question for iPhone support here, so I suggest that you post in the appropriate support area:
    Using iPhone
    The experts over there will likely suggest that you use the Apple Troubleshooting Guide for iOS devices, so you might want to work your way through that before you post in the iPhone support area.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398

  • Why becomes the *.desktop installed but the *.xpm not in my PKGBUILD?

    Hi,
    I'm a bit confused. I created a desktop and xpm file for vidalia. Here's the PKGBUILD:
    pkgname=vidalia
    pkgver=0.1.10
    pkgrel=3
    pkgdesc="Controller GUI for Tor"
    url="http://vidalia-project.net"
    arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
    license="GPL"
    depends=('qt>=4.2.0' 'tor')
    makedepends=('cmake>=2.4.0')
    source=(http://vidalia-project.net/dist/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz \
    vidalia.xpm \
    vidalia.desktop)
    md5sums=('9533fe2c29fe50d363c6e5b369ec8938'
    'be9fc03972f10a06ad54ef40d6ea2246'
    'd44470eb06ae46866b3fc44ebe6c7538')
    build() {
    [ -f /etc/profile.d/qt4.sh ] && source /etc/profile.d/qt4.sh
    cd $srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver
    cmake -D CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr .
    make || return 1
    make DESTDIR=$pkgdir install
    cd ..
    install -Dm644 vidalia.xpm $srcdir/usr/share/pixmaps/vidalia.xpm
    install -Dm644 vidalia.desktop $srcdir/usr/share/applications/vidalia.desktop
    The makepkg:
    /var/abs/local/vidalia$ makepkg
    ==> Making package: vidalia 0.1.10-3 i686 (Tue Nov 18 14:02:32 CET 2008)
    ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
    ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
    ==> Retrieving Sources...
    -> Found vidalia-0.1.10.tar.gz in build dir
    -> Found vidalia.xpm in build dir
    -> Found vidalia.desktop in build dir
    ==> Validating source files with md5sums...
    vidalia-0.1.10.tar.gz ... Passed
    vidalia.xpm ... Passed
    vidalia.desktop ... Passed
    ==> Extracting Sources...
    -> bsdtar -x -f vidalia-0.1.10.tar.gz
    ==> Removing existing pkg/ directory...
    ==> Entering fakeroot environment...
    ==> Starting build()...
    -- Configuring Vidalia 0.1.10
    -- Looking for OpenSSL libraries
    -- Looking for OpenSSL libraries - found
    -- Configuring done
    -- Generating done
    -- Build files have been written to: /var/abs/local/vidalia/src/vidalia-0.1.10
    [ 0%] Built target ts2po
    [ 3%] Built target miniupnpc
    [ 3%] [ 8%] Built target po2ts
    Built target common
    [ 25%] Built target i18n
    [ 37%] Built target torcontrol
    [100%] Built target vidalia
    [ 0%] Built target ts2po
    [ 3%] Built target miniupnpc
    [ 8%] Built target common
    [ 8%] Built target po2ts
    [ 25%] Built target i18n
    [ 37%] Built target torcontrol
    [100%] Built target vidalia
    Install the project...
    -- Install configuration: ""
    -- Installing: /var/abs/local/vidalia/pkg/usr/bin/vidalia
    -- Removed runtime path from "/var/abs/local/vidalia/pkg/usr/bin/vidalia"
    -- Installing: /var/abs/local/vidalia/pkg/usr/share/applications/vidalia.desktop
    ==> Tidying install...
    -> Compressing man pages...
    -> Stripping debugging symbols from binaries and libraries...
    ==> Creating package...
    -> Generating .PKGINFO file...
    -> Compressing package...
    ==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
    ==> Finished making: vidalia 0.1.10-3 i686 (Tue Nov 18 14:02:45 CET 2008)
    The installation:
    /var/abs/local/vidalia$ sudo pacman -U vidalia-0.1.10-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz
    loading package data...
    checking dependencies...
    (1/1) checking for file conflicts [######################################################] 100%
    (1/1) installing vidalia [######################################################] 100%
    /var/abs/local/vidalia$
    The problem:
    $ ls -al /usr/share/applications |grep vidalia
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 116 3. Nov 02:43 vidalia.desktop
    $ ls -al /usr/share/pixmaps |grep vidalia
    $
    Why is the desktop file installed but the xpm not? Both files ly in the same directory /var/abs/local/vidalia and have the same permission. You can also see in the pacman -U output that the desktop is installed but not the xpm file!

    Well, it seems a desktop file is being installed by the "make install" part so you do not need to do it manually.
    For the icon
    install -Dm644 vidalia.xpm $srcdir/usr/share/pixmaps/vidalia.xpm
    you want to install to $pkgdir, not $srcdir.
    I would also remove the "cd .." prior to the install and just do the following
    install -Dm644 $srcdir/vidalia.xpm $pkgdir/usr/share/pixmaps/vidalia.xpm

  • Why does the CS6 Master Collection Suite take up so much RAM on a computer??

    so, if, i brought the CS6 Master Collection Suite i would need more RAM on my computer right?
    because, my apple computer only has 4GB of memory and that program needs 4GB of RAM.
    I would need to add more memory to my apple computer say upgrade it to maybe 8GB of RAM??
    But, i don't understand why does that suite need so much memory or RAM on a computer??
    could i just only download the programs i really need onto my apple laptop and maybe that
    would free up some memory or RAM so that the program wouldn't  end up using all of the memory
    on my computer could i just do that??
    Message was edited by: mzpretty3

    Mzpretty3 you can find the system requirements for CS6 Master Collection at http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cs6-system-requirements.html#CS6_Master_ Collection_system_requirements.  For Mac OS we recommend a minimum of 4 GB of RAM and if you are going to do heavy photo or video editing then you will want to have at least 8 GB of RAM available.
    Please also be aware that the installation will require at least 15.5 GB of hard drive space.  This is separate from the amount of RAM which you have installed.

  • Why is the preview "Open" window so slow?

    Hey, there guys!
    I am wondering why it is that the new "Open" window is so slow in preview. It opens slowly, and when I select a folder, it takes a long time to index the folder's contents. However, I can open a file in preview using finder just fine. The indexing times are almost identical to those that I got when I first bought my mac. I noticed that after the update to Mountain Lion, there was a tab added to the top left called "iCloud". I'm wondering if this has anything to do with it?
    My question is: what I can do to increase the speed of the Preview "Open" command? I have seen a couple of forum posts regarding people having issues opening files, but none of them talked about the open window itself being slow.
    Thanks for your help!
    - Alpha Spartan A

    Agree the new ios6 is much slower. I found this post by doing a search to find out if it was only me. I've done off & on & a soft reset. Neither helped. Everything seems to load much slower & hangs.
    Maybe the new apps aren't optimized yet. However, I had one of my worst experiences with the Apple App Store. One would think they'd know how to optimize their own site & app.
    I just hope it's not a bloat issue because the "upgrades" are not worth the performance trade offs to me.
    Also, the iMaps are definitely not ready for prime time. I tried getting directions between two locations that were very mainstream and the app said it couldn't provide directions. I'll take Google without turn by turn, thank you. At least let us have a choice and let the best app win.

  • Why does the default install make a partition for boot?

    The installer, if one lets it prepare one's hard drive, makes a partition for boot, and formats it as a second extended filesystem. I know that people debate the need for/desirability of a partition for boot, and I do not mean to revive that debate. Rather, I am interested in knowing why the Arch developers, like the developers of some other distributions, such as Gentoo, but unlike some, such as Slackware, call for a boot partition, with ext2fs file system, on a default install. Should Arch users interpret this as a recommendation? Also, why is the partition quite a bit larger (although tiny compared to the available space on hard drives these days) than seems necessary?
    Thanks.

    I've looked at a couple of books and a fair number of internet posts on this, and I must say that these responses are a good deal more concise and clear than what I have come across. I did find it interesting that the Slackware on-line manual doesn't make any effort to encourage it. On the other hand, what you guys are saying sounds sensible enough.
    I have both Arch and Gentoo running, sharing a boot partition, which I set at 50MB. I'm using 25% of it, which is why I ask about size - obviously not in terms of overall capacity, but in terms of need.
    Why not a lot less - say, even if one is considering dual boot, 20MB? And where do numbers like 32MB come from (the Arch, and indeed Gentoo, default, also referred to by T-Dawg)? Why not use round numbers?
    Does 32MB have some rational/irrational/astrological/lucky 7 connection to 64MB RAM, sort of like designating 128MB as swap instead of using numbers like 120MB or 125MB or 130MB?
    As you probably know, in Gentoo this stuff is done on the command line in fdisk, and I found it quite odd to be told in their manual to tell fdisk that the boot partition should be 32MB (assuming a single operating system) and swap should be 256MB, especially since fdisk and my hard drive took these numbers with a grain of salt and conspired to adjust them to slightly different numbers complete with decimals. Arch, on default, does the same.
    Then I find out that with two operating systems, I'm using about 13MB out of 50MB (or rather 49.9MB, as fdisk and my hard drive decreed)
    To change the subject a bit, I think that it is a good idea that the current version of Arch .08 would create, on the default track, a /home partition. There are some nice ideas in the install dialogue, including in the section on setting up a hard drive.

  • HT1355 Why is the new iOS 6 so slow on the App Store?

    Why is the iOS 6 so slow on the App Store?

    Agree the new ios6 is much slower. I found this post by doing a search to find out if it was only me. I've done off & on & a soft reset. Neither helped. Everything seems to load much slower & hangs.
    Maybe the new apps aren't optimized yet. However, I had one of my worst experiences with the Apple App Store. One would think they'd know how to optimize their own site & app.
    I just hope it's not a bloat issue because the "upgrades" are not worth the performance trade offs to me.
    Also, the iMaps are definitely not ready for prime time. I tried getting directions between two locations that were very mainstream and the app said it couldn't provide directions. I'll take Google without turn by turn, thank you. At least let us have a choice and let the best app win.

  • Why is the new iOS 6 so slow?

    Why is the my iPad 3 running so slow now I have updated to iOS 6. Also unable to access the app shop

    Agree the new ios6 is much slower. I found this post by doing a search to find out if it was only me. I've done off & on & a soft reset. Neither helped. Everything seems to load much slower & hangs.
    Maybe the new apps aren't optimized yet. However, I had one of my worst experiences with the Apple App Store. One would think they'd know how to optimize their own site & app.
    I just hope it's not a bloat issue because the "upgrades" are not worth the performance trade offs to me.
    Also, the iMaps are definitely not ready for prime time. I tried getting directions between two locations that were very mainstream and the app said it couldn't provide directions. I'll take Google without turn by turn, thank you. At least let us have a choice and let the best app win.

  • Why is the voice recognition software so slow sometimes?

    What determines the responsiveness of the voice recognition software on the texting application on the iphone5?

    Agree the new ios6 is much slower. I found this post by doing a search to find out if it was only me. I've done off & on & a soft reset. Neither helped. Everything seems to load much slower & hangs.
    Maybe the new apps aren't optimized yet. However, I had one of my worst experiences with the Apple App Store. One would think they'd know how to optimize their own site & app.
    I just hope it's not a bloat issue because the "upgrades" are not worth the performance trade offs to me.
    Also, the iMaps are definitely not ready for prime time. I tried getting directions between two locations that were very mainstream and the app said it couldn't provide directions. I'll take Google without turn by turn, thank you. At least let us have a choice and let the best app win.

  • Why is the FPGA compiler server so slow?

    FPGA Cloud compiler is faster because NI servers are high performance, right????
    Well, my Windows 7 PC is high performance, but no luck there!
    Total CPU usage is never more than 25% and total memory usage (including other applications) is less than 16%.
    Why does the compile server not use all available resources? has it been restricted?
    How can I leverage more power from my PC?
    If NI Servers can compile code quicker, there must be plausible explanation / reason?
    Please advise, how to make the compile server run faster locally?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Try this if you haven't yet:
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-FPGA-Idea-Exchange/Turbo-Boost-the-speed-of-FPGA-compiles-under-Wind...
    In my experience, taking advantage of Intel's Turbo Boost (my PC has i5) reduced compile time from 85 minutes to 45.
    I'm currently testing Cloud Compiler and it took 110 minutes.  How can Cloud Compile Server be the slowest compile?

  • Mac Lifer using MacBook Pro - why is the performance and network SO slow now?

    I'm a 15+ year experience designer that lives on my machine. I'm in Adobe, Safari, Mail, Skype and Gotomeeting every day. Skype audio is spotty, Safari lags, Mail lags, and Adobe Photoshop CS6 fonts seem to give it a ton of grief. I would take it in to a store, but don't have the physical time.

    See ds store's excellent user tip - Why is my computer slow?
    You don't say which model you have, how much RAM, how much free space on your internal hard drive, etc. Information like that can be useful.
    Clinton

  • Why is the new iTunes 7 SSSOOOOOOOOOOO slow?

    I upgraded to the new iTunes 7 today and HOLY COW it's so slow I almost don't want to use it! Deleting a single song takes over 2 minutes! I'm not even doing anything trickey like downloading or copying - just opening and deleting are OUCH! slow! Why?

    iPad running slow? How to speed up a slow iPad
    http://appletoolbox.com/2012/07/ipad-running-slow-how-to-speed-up-a-slow-ipad/
    If You Think iOS 7 Feels Slow Here’s How to Speed It Up
    http://osxdaily.com/2013/09/23/ios-7-slow-speed-it-up/
    You may have many apps open which can possibly cause the slowdown and possibly the loss of wifi. In iOS 4-6 double tap your Home button & at the bottom of the screen you will see the icons of all open apps. Close those you are not using by pressing on an icon until all icons wiggle - then tap the minus sign. For iOS 7 users, there’s an easy way to see which apps are open in order to close them. By double-tapping the home button on your iPhone or iPad, the new multitasking feature in iOS 7 shows full page previews of all your open apps. Simply scroll horizontally to see all your apps, and close the apps with a simple flick towards the top of the screen.
     Cheers, Tom

  • Why did the Fios instalation technican cut my in house coaxial line?

    This has been bugging me for a few hours.  As part of the instalation process the fios technical physicaly sniped the coaxial cable in my house near the entrance at my door.  At the time, I didn't think much of it, after all, I was going to have Fios in an hour.
    But I haven't cancled my RCN yet, and more to the point, I didn't tell the guy I haden't cancled it.  He took it upon himself to snip the line running into my house that was still providing a service, and I can't understand why.  Had I thought more on it when it happened I would have been really upset, and am kicking myself for only thinking of it now.
    So, I was just wondering if anyone knew WHY he did this.  It must be a policy thing at some level...  but I can't find any info on it, and I can't be the only one to have considered it.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    He probably did it to prevent bigger problems later.
    Most FiOS installations re-use the in home coax, I suspect your home is no different.  If the RCN line gets connected into your in home coax network when FiOS is connected as well, all sorts of "bad things" can happen.  Neither signal will work and the FiOS signal will now be pushed out to your neighborhood potentially messing up other RCN subscribers. 
    By clipping the cable, the installer prevents anyone from reconnecting a "loose" connection causing an unhappy customer, angry non-customers and potentially the involvement of the PUC (government).
    Have Fun.
    If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer as Accepted Solution so others can see the solution to the problem.

Maybe you are looking for