Why muvo v100 slower than t

I have both a G muvo v00 and a 256M muvo txfm that I copy the same mp3 files to each day from the same computer. I notice that the time it takes to copy the same file is almost 4 times longer with the v00. Is that normal? If not, what could be wrong?
Greg

The Muvo V00 does have a slower transfer speed; you're not alone
Hopefully it will be fixed, but there has been no confirmation.

Similar Messages

Why is java slower than C and C++

Hi Guys:
I would like to know why Java is slower than C and C++ in terms of compilation speed...
Does it have to do with the fact that Java compiles to byte code first and then the JVM translates byte code to machine code which your processor can understand. whereas C and C++ compiles directly to machine code...
Any ideas on that,...let me know..

It's not necessarily. I would suggest that it always is; whencomparing
specific tasks.I would suggest that is never is (significantly)
when non-trivial and non-specialized applicationsare
involved. Requirements and design always have a
much greater impact.There's no doubt that the design is the most
important
aspect when writing a program, but assuming those
things
are equal, the fact is that a c program will be
faster.Yes, but given the fact that there is almost zero chance that the requirements, design and implementation will be optimal, it means that the real differences between the languages are insignificant compared to the real difference caused by the other factors.
In the theorectical world C/C++ is faster. In the real world, most of the time, it is not significant.

Anyone has any idea why KT400 is slower than KT333?

We have heard and seen reviews that MSI KT4 Ultra is(was) slower than KT3 Ultra(2), so as other manufacturers KT400 boards. All seem to be slower than KT333.
Anybody know why? or have read any studies on this issue?

I have no idea, but Mobo manufacturers are rushing new products to the market to be the first with 333, 400, what's next? My strategy is to read the reviews but wait until the board (or CPU) is sub top and buy it when the bugs have been ironed out (or well documented in fora like this) and the price has come down. Sorry, I am Dutch!

Why is Fiber Slower than Regular Broadband!?

After contacting BT to upgrade to fiber i was told that it would be slower than what i was currently getting on ASL?! i was told to contact openreach and infact the Customer Assistant i spoke to put in a question for me. They contacted me and awnsers nothing, useless.
Why is my fiber 1.5mb and ASL 3mb and any suggestions to how i can resolve this issue!?

Featured ProductsDownstream Line Rate(Mbps)Upstream Line Rate(Mbps)Downstream Range(Mbps)Availability Date
WBC ADSL 2+
Up to 3
2.5 to 6.5
Available
ADSL Max
Up to 3
2 to 5.5
Available
WBC Fixed Rate
1
Available
Fixed Rate
1
Available
Other Offerings
Copper Multicast
Available
all so slow

Why is firefox slower than before the reset?

The past 8 weeks Firefox has been extremely slow. I've tried safe mode and all the other web suggestions and finally did the 'Reset'. Now Firefox is slower than it was before the reset. Google, Duck Duck Go and IE. I've also tried Safari, which I didn't like, but all of them were faster than Firefox. Can anybody help me? I'm not that computer savvy to do a clean install and don't the $$ to have it done. Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.

Maybe you can do a clean install by following these instructions:
'''Note:''' You might want to print these steps or view them in another browser.
#Download the latest Desktop version of Firefox from [https://www.mozilla.org mozilla.org] (or choose the download for your operating system and language from [https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/all/ this page]) and save the setup file to your computer.
#After the download finishes, close all Firefox windows (or open the Firefox menu [[Image:New Fx Menu]] and click the close button [[Image:Close 29]]).
#Delete the Firefox installation folder, which is located in one of these locations, by default:
#*'''Windows:'''
#**C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
#**C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
#*'''Mac:''' Delete Firefox from the Applications folder.
#*'''Linux:''' If you installed Firefox with the distro-based package manager, you should use the same way to uninstall it - see [[Installing Firefox on Linux]]. If you downloaded and installed the binary package from the [http://www.mozilla.org/firefox#desktop Firefox download page], simply remove the folder ''firefox'' in your home directory.
#Now, go ahead and reinstall Firefox:
##Double-click the downloaded installation file and go through the steps of the installation wizard.
##Once the wizard is finished, choose to directly open Firefox after clicking the Finish button.
More information about reinstalling Firefox can be found [[Troubleshoot and diagnose Firefox problems#w_5-reinstall-firefox|here]].
WARNING: Do not use a third party uninstaller as part of this process. Doing so could permanently delete your [[Profiles|Firefox profile]] data, including but not limited to, extensions, cache, cookies, bookmarks, personal settings and saved passwords. These cannot be easily recovered unless they have been backed up to an external device! See [[Back up and restore information in Firefox profiles]]. 
Please report back to say if this helped you!
Thank you.

Why is firefox slower than explorer on windows 7?

firefox runs slower than explorer in windows 7. New laptop. I notice it when switching pages while on craigslist. Does not happen on other computers running xp or vista.

Some of your extensions might be the cause of the problem. Try starting Firefox in Safe Mode then going to Tools--Addons--Extensions to see if one of your extensions is causing a problem.
To go into Safe Mode click on this link
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode

Muvo V100 slow trans

I just got this Muvo v00 2GB yesterday and i was disappointed of the transfer speeds. I bought this to upgrade to my Muvo TX FM GB which has a good transfer speed. Not sure if this is a problem with the unit i got but the usb is working like its a USB . rather than a 2.0.
Anybody know why? or is there a fix to this? Thanks in advance.

i had just about made up my mind to get a V00 for someone,
i saw the spec sheets on shops all say USB.,
so i come here to check its USB2,
i see this.. and oh no! this sinks it for me. what a shame.
Why would creative release a new larger capacity player now thats . !
It looks like the V00 and V200 are USB (probably not firmware fixable either), can someone please confirm,
then its back to the TX for me, which is a shame - i like the look of the V00 :/Message Edited by Smiff2 on -0-200603:0 PM

Why is firefox slower than internet explorer , it use to be faster but not any more it like a snail

why is firefox very slow and internet explorer now leaves it standing ?
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== weeks ago

Some of your extensions might be the cause of the problem. Try starting Firefox in Safe Mode then going to Tools--Addons--Extensions to see if one of your extensions is causing a problem.
To go into Safe Mode click on this link
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode

MuVo V100 slow sync speeds (o.7 mb

0.7 MB/sec seems extremely slow to me, especially compared to my Sandisk or my RiO players. Is this normal?Any suggestions??WinXP ProUSB2.0AMD 64 3400+gb RAM?Help?

Can someone tell me the Proper Transfer Speed for this device?

Why is ethernet slower than wifi?

What might be the reasons for ethernet being slower that wifi?

Nope, Cat5e is certified at 1000Mb/s. And the wireless will not even be close to that.

Why is safari slower than chrome ?

i prefer safari over chrome but then chrome is way faster and it also uses compressed pages to save data. Is there any way to speed up safari or compress pages ? I just dont wanna use chrom , plz help me.

Go step by step and test.
1. Power cycle
     Power off the router. Unplug it from the wall. Wait a while.
     Plug it back to the wall. Power the router on. Wait until all the lights are lit properly.
     It will take a   while.
     Restart the computer.
     Start up in Safe Mode
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH11212
2 Empty Caches
    Safari > Preference > Advanced
    Checkmark the box for "Show Develop menu in menu bar".
    Develop menu will appear in the Safari menu bar.
    Click Develop and select "Empty Caches" from the dropdown.
    2. Quit Safari if open.
    Option click the "Go" menu in the Finder menu bar.
    Select "Library" and then "Caches".
    Look for the folder 'com.apple.Safari"
    Right click "com.apple.Safari" and select "Move to Trash"
    Relaunch Safari.
3. Reset Safari.
    Click Safari in the menu bar.
    From the drop down select "Reset Safari".
      Click "Reset".
4. Safari > Preferences > Privacy > Cookies and all other website data:
     Press “Remove All Website Data” button
5. Turn off Extensions if any, and launch Safari.
    Safari > Preferences > Extensions
6. Remove all third party addons, plugins and anti-virus software
    Run EtreCheck .
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-6173

Why is AAC slower than MP3 when importing?

I was getting 13x speed with MP3 (160 kb) selected, but only 8x with AAC (128). I could see a minor difference, but that seems like a big difference.
Thanks,
Alfredo

Regarding the quality of resulting tracks: AAC 128 is approx MP3 192.
Converting to AAC requires just more computing power as it results in smaller files with higher quality compared to MP3.

Why firefox is slower than chrome?

I switched to chrome because of this...

<blockquote>
The issue may be due to the difference in the page rendering technology used by Chrome and Firefox. </blockquote>
dileepkumars1: Mozilla uses Spidermonkey (written by Eich in 10 days!) for Firefox whilst Google uses their own V8 engine.
'''gedaiu''': 
Hi, sorry you're having problems with Firefox. Can you try to access Firefox in Safe Mode to see if the problem still exists and/or if it opens? You can follow the below instructions to start it in that mode.
*Go to Help > Restart with add-ons disabled
*When Firefox closes and re-opens, select ''Start in Safe Mode''
If Firefox works fine after starting in Safe Mode, then it's most likely one of your extensions misbehaving. You can enable your add-ons back on by one until you find the conflicting extension.

Safari is slower than Firefox - Why

Hi together,
Safari - Firefox - both Finalversion
Why is Safari slower than Firefox, both has "Werbefilter" activated. Safari runs since 2:25 h
Can someone explane that solution. Why Safari is slower than Firefox. Thank You

HI,
It can depend on how long you save your History, how many Bookmarks you have. Safari is far more secure a web browser than Firefox. Also, if you have any third party Safari plugins installed or use Safari Extensions, that can slow a browser down, or if you visit sites that stream Flash content, that can also be a factor.
Very hard to compare two browsers. One written by Apple, one written by Mozilla.
Your profile: v10.6.4. If that's the case, keep your Mac OS X software up to date by clicking your Apple menu / Software Update.
Also... maintenance. Boot from your install disc once a month. Check to see if there are any errors on the startup disk that need repairing. Problems with the startup disk can definitely cause any browser problems.
Using OpenDNS or GoogleDNS can speed your browsers up. Instructions here.
Slow Safari: Speeding It Up
Safari and Firefox and Google Chrome all load pages at the same speed on v10.6.5 / Safari 5.0.3 / Firefox 3.3.6 and Chrome 9.0.597.10
Carolyn

Multihreading seems to run slower than multiple JVM

Hello,
I have a 4-core machine and I use windows XP.
I build a java application that can launch a thread doing a series of heaving calculation.
The thread takes 8sec to finish and the task manager indicate that 30% of CPU is in use.
If I start 2 threads at the same time, each one finish in 14sec, using 40% of CPU.
Now if I start 2 times my application, and run simultaneously 1 thread in each one, they all finish in 8 sec but using 60% of CPU.
My question is why multithreading goes slower than running 2 JVM in parallel ? When running a profiler on the app, it doesn't seems to wait for shared ressources.
Regarding the CPU usage, it seems that using one JVM doesn't use full available CPU.
Is that a 'normal' behaviour, have you some explanation to it ?
I hope I'm clear enough !
Raphael

I have digged it, and found the part of code that has this behaviour : intialization or copy of a big array.
There is a piece of code showing this behaviour :
public class TestParallel {
 public TestParallel() throws Exception {
 Thread T1 = new Thread(new Worker());
 Thread T2 = new Thread(new Worker());
 Thread T3 = new Thread(new Worker());
 Thread T4 = new Thread(new Worker());
 long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
 T1.start();
 T1.join();
 T2.start();
 T2.join();
 System.out.println("Serial: " + (System.currentTimeMillis()-time) + " millis");
 time = System.currentTimeMillis();
 T3.start();
 T4.start();
 T3.join();
 T4.join();
 System.out.println("Parallel : " + (System.currentTimeMillis()-time) + " millis");
 public class Worker implements Runnable {
 public void run(){
 long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
 for (int i=0 ; i < 1000 ; i++){
 double[] aBigArray = new double[500000];
 System.out.println("Worker time : " + (System.currentTimeMillis()-time) + " millis");
 public static void main(String args[]){
 try{
 new TestParallel();
 }catch (Exception e){
 e.printStackTrace();
}I imagine it's a normal behaviour, and there is no workaround.
So I try another way, without array initialization but using System.arrayCopy. But I have the same problem.
You can try by changing Worker runnable this way :
 public class Worker implements Runnable {
 public void run(){
 double[] array1 = new double[500000];
 double[] array2 = new double[500000];
 Arrays.fill(array1, 0.03);
 long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
 for (int i=0 ; i < 1000 ; i++){
 System.arraycopy(array1, 0, array2, 0, 500000);
 System.out.println("Worker time : " + (System.currentTimeMillis()-time) + " millis");
 }I have this output :
Worker time : 3625 millis
Worker time : 3609 millis
Serial: 7266 millis
Worker time : 6531 millis
Worker time : 6563 millis
Parallel : 6594 millisSo two parallel thread working on different arrays with System.arraycopy take nearly twice as much time ???
Edited by: RaphaelH on Jun 23, 2009 4:27 AM

Why muvo v100 slower than t

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for