Why my edits don't transfer between lr4 and cs4

I edit my images for the most part in LR4 then export as a raw file into a new folder. Then when I view the images in bridge my edits don't show up. Do I have to convert to JPEG for my edits to stick?
Thank you!!!

Victoria Bampton wrote:
The short answer is yes. CS4 won't understand the edits you've done in LR4, because it's so much older. You'd need CS6 for PS to understand them.
The original question asked about JPGs. The user could convert the photos to TIF, avoiding the drawbacks of JPGs, which would then work in CS4.

Similar Messages

Why have apple disabled file transfer between iphone and other devices?

I have recently purchased an iPhone and i was about to send a file from my iPhone to a friends android and i found that it wasnt possible. Does anyone know why apple have not allowed this feature on any of the iPhones?

I venture to say security is the primary reason.
http://macdailynews.com/2011/08/24/apples-ios-unaffected-by-malware-as-android-e xploits-surge-76/

Metadata Conflicts between LR4 and CS6

I recently upgraded to LR4 and CS6 Extended. I will offer start in LR4 but switch to CS6 for additional editing. On some of my thumbnails, I will see a "!" in the upper right hand corner on the thumbnails. When I click on the icon, a pop-up window appear stating a Metadata conflict has occurred. The pop-up window gives you two options: Copy file data into the catalog or have the catalog overwrite the file data. What is the best thing to do knowing you are only working between LR4 and CS6?

This is a known issue with the latest PS update. Refer to the pertinent thread on the PS forum.
Mylenium

Secure the file/data transfer between XI and any third-party system

Hi All,,
I would like to use to "secure" SSH on OS Level the file/data transfer between XI and any third-party system Run OS Command before processing and OS command After processing. right now my XI server installed on iSeries OS.
with ISeries we can't call the Unix commands hope we need to go for AS400 (CL) Programming. If we created the AS400 programm how i can call that in XI.
If any one have idea pls let me know weather it will work or not.
Thanks in adavance.
Venkat

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I have red some blogs like /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2007/07/31/sftp-vs-ftps-in-sap-pi to call the Unix Shell script in XI.
But as i know in iSeries OS we can write the shell script we need to go for AS400 programe. If we go with AS400 how we need to call that programe and it will work or not i am not sure there i need some help please.
Thanks,
Venkat

Difference between CS3 and CS4 when placing images, percentage not kept

There is some kind of difference between CS3 and CS4 when placing images. The images I've dealt with right now were vector images but it might apply to all kinds of images.
When replacing an existing image, the CS4 behaviour is to let the image fill up the frame. In CS3 the percentage was set to 100% as default (the % you see when selecting the image, not the container).
Also when replacing an impage in CS4, the "inner" image frame is kept, while in C3, the percentage was kept.
Is there some kind of placement preferences / settings to let CS4 act the same wat as CS3 did, when placing an image?
-- Andreas

Yes, the behavior was changed in CS4 (and many users, like me, prefer the new system).
If you click and drag a loaded image place cursor the entire image will be be scaled to fit the proportionally drawn frame -- a huge timesaver if you mostly place uncropped art. If you want 100% of the image at 100% scale, just click and release -- same as before, or as before you can pre-draw a frame and place into it and your image will come in cropped at 100% (unless you've changed the fitting options for the frame before placing).
Peter

Transfer between iPod and iTunes - mission impossible !

I recently got iPod Touch (latest model with latest iOS) - just to use it in my car. I simply wanted to add and remove few songs. In a normal world, there would be just 2 columns (ipod/computer and simple managing both parts within files and folders management - let us be sincere, can anything be more natural and straightforward ? Sure not). But Apple wants it to make super complicated and highly frustrating. OK, what to do,
Since I already have a different computer (newer version of MBP Retina, with the latest OSX) , I needed to get the iPod content to the iTunes on the new computer somehow. This is impossible as such - since iTunes keep telling that if I want to associate this iPod with this iTunes library , I have to erase the iPod (this is something I really don't want). I try "full backup" - as offered by iTunes ... I do it few times, the process starts, but always lasts quite short (considering 1700 songs with 24 GB on my iPod). The result is - nothing is backuped to this computer ... very nice ...
In further search, I discover some third party apps, that supposedly could help with this terrible process. I bought AnyTrans and started transferring the content to iTunes. in 9 hours, it was just 4 GB transferred ... (overnight) ... obviously not the way ... On another advice , I bought iExplorer, it should be supposedly better. I tried to transfer the iPod content to iTunes ("start automatic transfer). I tried it 5 times. As a result, the app always froze and for quit was the only solution. NIce. Then I got an advice that it is good not to transfer to iTunes but just to some folder on a computer. That finally worked. Good
Then I added all these songs to iTunes Library (finally some first result after many hours of effort). Then I agreed that this iPod can be associated with this iTunes Library (that already contained those 1700 songs) and let it synced with this iPod. After some time the iPod was indeed erased. No music in it any more. As much as I tried again and again to sync it with iTunes Library, the process went in three short steps and finished. The result - no music on iPod, whatever I do ... Full music Library in iTunes on MBP
What shall I say and still keep my expressions decent ? (difficult) This iTunes and this system of working with files on iPod or iPhones is for me the most stupid invention ever. How could someone ever create such a terrible nonsense that make simple things impossible and highly frustrating ? Instead of simple file transfer between devices ... I have no words for that ... It is also possible that it is me who is stupid, in that case, please let me know how can I transfer songs from iPod to iTunes and how can I how some songs on iPod (that are already in iTunes Library). Not to waste computer space by having iPod library copied there, is another thing, but let us not go to details now

Yes, all played in iTunes in the computer, right boxes checked (see the printscreens) ... In the end , I restored to restarting iPod and MBP. After that it started working (synchronisation). But only up to some extent. In iTunes Library I have about 1700 tracks, but only 660 were transferred to iPod. Now I made: "add to library" - adding to library all the song I already have in Library: and the iTunes started working hard to add the rest in the Library (but they were already there ...)
So finally I spend nice whole day to add/remove songs in my iPod ...
Another thing is - when in iTunes Library I want to add/change genre to some songs, the process takes so long, it is like each song is freshly copied just to add the tag "classical" etc to each ... I thought I have the "fastest Mac ever" ... Waiting so long for such trivial process is unbelievable ... (with rainbow circle making a nice decoration now and then)

Most efficient data transfer between RT and FPGA

This post is related to THIS post about DMA overhead.
I am currently investigating themost efficient way to transfer a set of variables to a FPGA target for out application. We have been using DMA FIFOs for communications in both directions (to and from FPGA) but I'm recently questioning whether this is the most efficient approach.
Our application must communicate several parameters (around 120 different variables in total) to the FPGA. Approximately 16 of these are critical meaning that they must be sent every iteration of our RT control loop. The others are also important but can be sent at a slightly slower rate without jeopardising the integrity of our system. Until now we have sent these 16 critical parameters plus ONE non-critical parameter over a DMA to the FPGA card. Each 32-bit value sent incorporates an ID which allows the FPGA to demultiplex to the appropriate global variables on the FPGA. Thus over time (we run a 20kHz control loop on the RT system - we have a complete set of paramaters sent @ approx. 200Hz). The DMA transfers are currently a relatively large factor in limiting the execution speed of our RT loop. Of the 50us available per time-slot running at 20kHz approximately 12-20us of these are the DMA transfers to and from the FPGA target. Our FPGA loop is running at 8MHz.
According to NI the most efficient way to transfer data to a FPGA target is via DMA. While this may in general be true, I have found that for SMALL amounts of data, DMA is not terribly efficient in terms of speed. Below is a screenshot of a benchmark program I have been using to test the efficiency of different types of transfer to the FPGA. In the test I create a 32MB data set (Except for the FXP values which are only present for comparison - they have no pertinence to this issue at the moment) which is sent to the FPGA over DMA in differing sized blocks (with the number of DMA writes times the array size being constant). We thus move from a single really large DMA transfer to a multitude of extremely small transfers and monitor the time taken for each mode and data type. The FPGA sends a response to the DMA transfers so that we can be sure that when reading the response DMA that ALL of the data has actually arrived on the FPGA target and is not simply buffered by the system.
We see that the minimum round-time for the DMA Write and subsequent DMA read for confirmation is approximately 30us. When sending less than 800 Bytes, this time is essentially constant per packet. Only when we start sending more than 800 Bytes at a time do we see an increase in the time taken per packet. A packet of 1 Byte and a packet of 800 Bytes take approxiamtely the SAME time to transfer. Our application is sending 64 Bytes of critical information to the FPGA target each time meaning that we are clearly in the "less efficient" region of DMA transfers.
If we compare the times taken when communication over FP controls we see that irrespective of how many controls we write at a time, the overall throughput is constant with a timing of 2.7us for 80 Bytes. For a small dedicated set of parameters, the usage of front panel controls seems to be significantly faster than sending per DMA. Once we need to send more than 800 Bytes, the DMA starts to become rapidly more efficient.
Say hello to my little friend.
RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

So to continue:
For small data sets the usage of FP controls may be faster than DMAs. OK. But we're always told that each and every FP control takes up resources, so how much more expensive is the varsion with FP controls over the DMA.
According to the resource usage guide for the card I'm using (HERE) the following is true:
DMA (1023 Elements, I32, no Arbitration) : 604 Flip-Flops 733 LUT 1 Block RAM
1x I32 FP Control: 52 Flip-Flops 32 LUTs 0 Block RAM
So the comparison would seem to yield the following result (for 16 elements).
DMA : 604 FLip-Flops 733 LUT 1 Block RAM
FP : 832 FLip-Flops 512 LUT 0 Block RAM
We require more FLip-Flops, less LUTs and no Block RAM. It's a swings and roundabouts scenario. Depending on which resources are actually limited on the target, one version or the other may be preferred.
However, upon thinking further I realised something else. When we use the DMA, it is purely a communications channel. Upon arrival, we unpack the values and store them into global variables in order to make the values available within the FPGA program. We also multiplex other values in the DMA so we can't simply arrange the code to be fed directly from the DMA which would negate the need for the globals at all. The FP controls, however, ARE already persistent data storage values and assuming we pass the values along a wire into subVIs, we don't need additional globals in this scenario. So the burning question is "How expensive are globals?". The PDF linked to above does not explicitly mention the difference in cost between FP controls and globals so I'll have to assume they're similar. This of course massively changes the conclusion arrived to earlier.
The comparison now becomes:
DMA + Globals : 1436 Flip-Flops 1245 LUTs 1 Block RAM
FP : 832 FLip-Flops 512 LUT 0 Block RAM
This seems very surprising to me. I'm suspiscious of my own conclusion here. Can someone with more knowledge of the resource requirements differences between Globals and FP controls weigh in? If this is really the case, we need to re-think our approach to communications between RT and FPGA to most likely employ a hybrid approach.
Shane.
Say hello to my little friend.
RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

File transfer between macbook and other macs

I need to do a file transfer between my macbook and a macbook pro and my macbook and an ibook. What ways can you recommend? FTP is slow for me because it's a campus network, and bluetooth takes a while too (in the ranges of 1 to 2 hours). I believe it can be done through firewire and/or USB right?
If I were to use USb, is there any special software needed? Or will each mac detect each other as a hard drive or?
What about firewire? I understand it needs to have a hub or a server? Is that true? Can file transfers be done just via a firewire alone?
Thanks!

If you want to access your friend's files, he should enable File Sharing on his machine and you should choose Finder > Go > Connect to Server... His machine should show up in the Connect to Server dialog box. This should work with ethernet; AFAIK USB will not work.
From Mac Help:
"You can use an Ethernet cable to connect two Macintosh computers and share files or play network games.
1. Connect an Ethernet cable from the Ethernet port of one computer to the Ethernet port on the other.
2. Open Sharing preferences on both computers and turn on Personal File Sharing. Note the Computer Name for the computers.
3. On one of the computers, choose Go > Connect To Server and then click Browse.
4. Double-click the other computer in the window and enter your password, if necessary.
If you manually configured the TCP/IP settings for the built-in Ethernet configuration on the computer you are connecting to, you may need to enter that computer's TCP/IP address in the Connect To Server dialog.
To see or set the TCP/IP address, open Network preferences and choose your Ethernet port configuration from the Show pop-up menu (named Built-in Ethernet unless you gave it another name)."

I had to change computers. Why doesn't apple automatically transfer my music and movies?

I had to change computers. I can't get Apple to transfer my music and movies. Why isn't there some simple way to do this?

There are various methods to copy your content between computers : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4527
Also assuming that you are in France then you should be able to re-download purchased music : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2519 - films are a one-time only download

TS3999 Calendars don't sync between Iphone and Ipad.

When a calendar entry is added from my wife's phone to mine there is no entry, but it's on my mini-pad instead. Why is it on one device and not the other? I have chosen sync and all events in settings , but is still doesn't work for both devices, only the min-pad. I can add an event manually, but can't receive any notifications on the calendar if its sent to my Iphone. Please advise, thanks.

It requires that you set up the same iCloud account on all your devices (Settings > iCloud) or at least that you share some of the calendars between you and your wife (in case that you are using two separate iCloud accounts which is by the way recommended).

Question about transfer between oracle and sql server

Could i program to transfer lots of data between Oracle and SQL Server quickly?
I have tried make two connection between two databases, but it took me lots of time to transfer data.
How could I do it?
Thanks

Hi,
If you need to move data fast, then use the Oracle Migration Workbench to Generate SQL Server BCP data extraction scripts and Oracle SQL Loader files.
This is the fastest way to migrate the data.
In the Oracle Model UI tab of the Oracle Migration Workbench, right mouse click on the tables folder. there is a menu option to 'Generate SQL Loader ...' scripts. This will help you migrate your data efficiently.
Regards
John

File transfer between Mac and Windows

I am running Windows on my Mac and I transfer files between mac and Windows alot using my external hard drive. I was wondering if there was an easier way to do this than having to use my external hard drive like a networking solution or something. Thanks...

i also run windows on my mac (for work). The issue i had was that when booted in osx, i could see the windows partition, and copy files FROM it to the mac side, but i could not copy files TO the windows partition.
As i understand it, this is because the apple NTFS driver (to read the windows partition) only allows read access (not read and write access). It was easily solved with MacFuse (which is an open source way to add different disk file systems to your mac, kind of like teaching it a new language), and NTFS-3G for mac osx.
http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/
scroll down a bit for the download link. The installer will put in MacFuse and NTFS-3G, so it's the only one you need.
After a reboot, i can read/write to the windows partition while booted into macosx (and it's free).
i hope that helps.
p.s. the efi boot manager download is NOT required.

Withdrawal Qty don't match between ECC and APO

Hi Experts.
I am facing a discrepancy for Withdrawal Qty between ECC and APO before delivery/PGI creation.
In ECC T.code MD63 I am able to see the withdrawal Qty as expected but in APO a duplicated withdrawal Qty is being created. But this is not happening for all materials, only some specifics materials. I did a check in Material Master data and I have no found any difference between a material that is working and one that is not working...
Can please somebody explain me why APO is dobling the Withdrawal Qty.
Thanks a Lot
Daniel Campos.

Please check wthether you have dp index duplication in this problem.
Please follow the process.
For this process , you need to follow these steps .
1. From the table /SAPAPO/MATKEY , find the product id of the product for which you feel there is problem .
2. Find the location id from table /SAPAPO/LOC for the location.
3. Use the above found 'product id' and 'location id' to find the dp index in table "/SAPAPO/DP_HEAD " .
Enter the planning version ' 000 ' in this table . If there is some error you will find multiple entries of the 'dp index ' in this table for the ' 000 ' planning version. If error found use below program to delete the dp index .
4. Precaution should be taken before we delete the 'Dp Index' as the consumption history is lost due to this . In the program 'Z_DEL_WITHDRAWL' there are 2 check boxes " update " and " list ". List will show the DP index and update will delete it. Need to extremely careful in this program as wrong selection will cause problem .

How do I transfer my LR4 and Photoshop to my new MacBook?

My MacBook Pro Mid 2009 is so slow when trying to edit photos taken with my D800! I have finally decided to get a new MacBook buy wondering how I can get LR4 and all its catalogues on my new computer. I also need to know how to get my current version of Photoshop,
Thanks for any feedback!

Donwload the trial version of LR4.4 from Adobe
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5566
Enter your serial number to license it.
I also need to know how to get my current version of Photoshop,
Which version of Photoshop is your current version?

Colors don't match between PS and AI (CS 3)

CMYK images are displaying differently for me between PS and AI. In PS when they look "good" (and print similarly on my profiled Epson), in AI they look more contrasty and saturated, with a little color shift in the greens (towards blue).
My monitor is calibrated with a Monaco Optix, and I notice the difference between apps both on it and on my MacBook Pro screen.
Image profile is the standard SWOP v2. In AI, the document profile is SWOP v2. "Proof Colors" is unchecked in both apps. (If I check it, by default AI is radically different because it defaults to simulating black ink. Disabling this causes Proof Colors to have no visual effect.)
I asked this already in the AI forum, and the answer I got is basically "they should match, they do for me". I noticed elsewhere on this forum that AI and PS were different in color management, or rendering, or something, but didn't see much info beyond that.
I figured there were enough color hounds on this forum to set me straight.
- Bob

With a properly calibrated and profiled monitor, and with correct color settings in both programs, trust Photoshop's colors over Illustrator's.
This may have changed in CS4, but in CS3 Illustrator hadn't caught up with Photoshop in regard to color management.

Why my edits don't transfer between lr4 and cs4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for