Why no manual?

It's a major and inexplicable omission not to have a manual for downloading like every other Adobe product. The so-called online manual is nothing but a bunch of tutorials; very nice, but useless when trying to read up on a particular feature.

Hi
You can refer to these and select the topics to proceed :
http://helpx.adobe.com/muse/topics.html
http://tv.adobe.com/show/learn-muse/
Thanks,
Sanjit

Similar Messages

  • HT3805 why is Manual grayed out in sort photos

    why is Manual grayed out in sort photos

    will try and find This Solved My Problem
    You will not find it, Mike. You posted this thread as a discussion, not a question, so there is no "This solved my Problem".  Theer two different kind of threads - discussions and question. You can award points only for questions.
    I just tried to answer your other question, but it vanished, after I posted my answer   Re: in Aperture 3.4.3 how do you sort photos manually?
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Sony, why no manual?

    Sony, why no manual for the XBR65X930C?  I would prefer a printed manual but I would take an on-line one. The brief descriptions that you presently provide about installing the television just don't cut it. There are a multitude of options--a good thing--but without the explanation provided by a manual as you have provided in the past, many of them are unintelligible to persons such as myself with a big appreciation for your outstanding television products but with little technical apptituide and equally, little patience. So, Sony, why no manual?

    Hi there, Drbeqg! Here are all the Manuals for the Sony XBR65X930C (including the reference guide): http://esupport.sony.com/US/p/model-home.pl?mdl=XBR65X930C&template_id=1&region_id=1&tab=manuals#/manualsTab Best regards,  

  • Why is manual intervention required anyway?

    Hello,
    recently there were 2 announcements about "manual intervention required" in the news,
    filesystem upgrade
    initscripts update
    Questions:
    1. Do I have to make these changes also, when I do a clean install with the actual image from 2011.08.19?
        If so, they should be mentioned right in the download page, or in the cli when I upgrade, otherwise
        I have to look through all the news back until the date where the image is from.
    2.  Why is manual intervention required anyway, just to delete a stupid file? If the problem is, that the package
         does not own the file, then why do you not create a mother package that can do everything for such cases?
    Sorry, but I have to add this one: "You should change KISS to KRTFM (keep RTFM)"
    Thanks.

    I'll add my 2 cents, I don't believe this point has been made abundantly clear yet:
    Manual intervention is sometimes required because we don't want to wipe user configuration or possibly break the system. While this is usually solved by installing duplicate files as .pacnew files and informing the user that he / she needs to manually merge the original file with the .pacnew file (migrating possible user configuration along with it), this isn't always a possible solution.
    We can't do that if a file holding possible user configuration needs to be changed, but is system critical. An example:
    Let's say grub is updated to a new version. Due to a change in grub, the syntax in grub's configuration file menu.lst is changed. We can't make this update for the user because we can't be sure what the user has added to this file. We also can't install the new file as a .pacnew because the new version of grub is not compatible with the old style configuration file, the system may not start up at all!  Hey, we could just delete the old file and put the new file in its place, but the user will have lost all his configuration. Nobody wants that. Imagine having to fix your configuration every time you update. No thanks!
    The only decent way to solve this is to request manual intervention, there is no reliable way to do this automatically. This has nothing to do with the amount of effort this would take, some of these upgrades simply can't be resolved automagically. This also nicely explains allan's post:
    yaffare wrote:
    Allan wrote:Manual interventions is required because we are rolling release.  That means we can not just save big changes for every six months.
    Thats not an argument, what does it has to do with rolling release or not? Nothing.
    There are arguments like Trilby said with security issues or that its too much effort for your team or you think its not worth the time.
    Non-rolling releases can postpone updates that would cause system breakage like the grub update in my example, a rolling release like Arch Linux can't do that. We don't have a 6-monthly 'stable' base to work from, or the option to let updates that would require manual intervention wait till the next 'stable' release.
    Distributions like Ubuntu and Fedora don't require manual intervention because the situations where these manual interventions are required are pushed to the new release of the distribution, or are simply allowed to wipe user configuration. The downside to this being that users of those distributions have to wait for a next release to be able to use the new version of some applications.
    Now as for this:
    yaffare wrote:
    If I can delete a file manually, than a script can do the same, as its the same for file for every user and every user who has installed the package has to delete the file.
    Basically my question is: Why do you not create a workaround, so that manual intervention is not required?
    You, as a person, can tell what changes you have made to the first file. You can also tell if those changes need to be put into the new file, and where they should go. You can tell this because you're an intelligent person capable of reasoning, a computer can't do this. We can create workarounds for quite a few situations, but we can't ever be 100% sure what a user changed or wants to change. We need the user to tell us what he / she wants, thus we require manual intervention.
    I hope this explains the need for manual intervention.
    Last edited by stefanwilkens (2011-12-29 23:34:49)

  • Why do manually added mp3s in the Podcasts app all show up in the same folder?

    Let me explain!
    I like to download lectures and talks and audio books from other sources than iTunes.
    I like to add these mp3 files to iTunes, change the Media type of them from Music to Podcast, and transfer them to my iPod Touch. This is so I will more easily know which ones have been listened to and can be removed.
    This worked (and works) well in the Music app. Everything was separated into folders based on what album name I had manually assigned to the ID3 tags of the files.
    But in the Podcast app, all of these files are now lumped into one folder.
    I currently have eight un-listened-to episodes of Philip K. Dick's Valis on my iPod Touch. But the folder shows a count of 106 unheard episodes in relation to this audio book, because it lumps all of my other manually added podcast media tracks into the same folder.
    Why is this?
    Why does the Podcasts app refuse to let me separate manually added files into individual folders based on album information?
    Had the My Stations feature let me populate its playlists in a more rational manner, and also allowed me to manually change the running order of the tracks (something which only seems to be possible in the On-The-Go playlist), I would not think that this omission was such an annoyance.
    I have been searching for months for mentions of this problem, but I have not seen a single one, and so I have finally decided to make my own thread.
    Let me know if the nature of my problem remains unclear.
    Joakim

    That doesn't do anything.
    When I plug my phone in and attempt to sync it with iTunes and click on "Steven's iPhone" under "Devices" the display to the right just says "loading..." and it stays like that for hours. Nothing happens.
    As far as I can tell, there is literally no way for me to delete the photos from my iPhone and I therefore, cannot upgrade to the newest software, download new apps, etc.

  • Why No Manual Backup?

    As I'm frustrated with the search engine on the forum I thought I'd start a new thread.
    I spent about two days developing images from a shoot in LR2. Decided to backup my work...just in case...
    Well, the only way to backup your work is to close lightroom and reopen it and since I had selected the "backup lightroom every time it opens" box in the preferences, when it began to reopen I ran the integrity check and backed it up to a 2nd external drive.
    I did not move anything. I simply backed up a catalog I had just closed to a different drive... voila!!!
    Work gone... images still there... sans developed settings.
    Great software... EXCEPT THERE'S NO MANUAL BACKUP!!!
    Why?

    Why would one want to save all the minuite detail of each develop steps. e.g Every time you move a slider, exposure +.50; brightness +.25; exposure -10; exposure +5; fill light +30; brightness -25; exposure -45.
    So what's the final position exposure +0; brightness +0; fill light +30, this is what LR will apply if you export  or save to xmp at this stage, the individual steps you applied to arrive at this position is not important, why would you need to save this information. If you need to save at different stages of your work there is always create virtual copy.

  • Why is manual sort order disabled in album view

    I created an album and added pictures. By default, the photos are displayed in sort order by date. I'd like to manually order them. However, when I select the sort order drop down box, the option to manually order the photos is disabled. How can I enable it or why is it disabled.

    It is not available because you have yet to create a manual sort for that Album, and so there is no "Manual Sort" available. Create a manual sort manually (re-arrange the photos). Then the "Manual Sort" menu choice should become available.
    The menu switches between the existing sorts.
    I didn't design it. This makes sense to engineers, but not so much to users. Any time you manually re-arrange your images, the sort is automatically changed to "Manual". Aperture remembers the last manual sort; it is always available via the sort selector.

  • Why no manual gc?

    It seems to me that the one feature missing from Java's
    memory management model is the ability to demand that a specific object be garbage collected immediately if you know it's not going to be used anymore. What I mean is something like C++ "delete" keyword, where you could call it if you wanted to but you wouldn't have to because automatic gc would come get your object sooner or later anyway. It seems to me that a feature like this would make optimizing code much easier than learning the whole toolbox of programming techniques needed to use automatic gc efficiently. You'd get the best of both Java and C++, basically.
    can somebody please give me a general description of why this idea isn't feasible or isn't already a part of java?
    thanks alot!
    --tim bouck                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

    I imagine that it would be possible to assign a hashcode of some sort to each object and reference at creation-time, and have the VM refuse to service the request if the hashcodes don't match. That way, my obsolete object reference has the same hashcode as a nonexistant object, while your password object has a new hashcode known only to references created at the same time or after you refilled that memory address. These would have to be stored in a global object reference table somewhere, which I bet already exists. There would be slight overhead of checking validity each time an object was accessed, but doesn't this also already exist with stuff like SecurityManager?
    PS I know the creators of Java weren't stupid-- overall the language is the most elegant piece of compsci i've ever seen. When I think I see a hole in it I usually suspect my understanding is incorrect.
    thanks
    --tim bouck                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Why no manual eject? Is it for security reason?

    Lets say you want to leave your desk and the disc in the drive is at risk of being stolen. If you log out and there is no manual eject then the disc is safe yes?
    Would the Apple dudes think along these lines or have I been watching too many James Bond movies. Which I have.

    In the Floppy Disk Drives (called SuperDrives) there was a hole where a bent paper clip could be inserted and force the mechanism open. This was also present on the early iMacs (certainly my iMac DV in 1999) and the CD300e which was Apple's second external optical drive we had in about 1994. The paper clip still holds many memories for Apple users and it caused great delight when some iPhones shipped with an Apple paper clip:http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/03/iphone-returns-from-service-with-offici al-iphone-tool/
    The hold-your-mouse-button-down-during-startup works beneath the OS so will work for cases where the hardware is not defective.
    cheers
    mrtotes

  • "Manually manage music and videos" takes up more space than syncing?

    Hello all,
    I fear that I am just stupid and unseeing an obvious answer to this query, but ask I shall, because it is frustrating me to no end.
    I recently downloaded a few audiobooks from my local library to listen to on my iPod Touch; the app in question requires that you "manually manage music and videos" rather than syncing. Fine.
    I switch over to iTunes, check the box, and now my music--without changing anything, mind--is now taking up an additional 1.8 (or more) gigs on my iPod. I toggle the option to "manually manage" on and off, and with it "on", my music takes up more space than with it "off", even though it's the same music, same podcasts.
    Can someone please explain to me why syncing manually takes up more space than syncing automatically and where the extra gigs are coming from? There's not that much audio on my iPod--1.52 gb of music, 1.97 gb of podcasts and .69 gb of apps--which only adds up to 4.18 gb, and on an 8g touch, should leave me with about 4 gb of "wiggle room", so to speak, rather than .27 gb.
    Help, please!

    iTunes will normally put just one copy of each file on the iPod and link it to multiple playlists. If your iPod's database has been corrupted at some point however, there may be unattached copies of your meadia from earlier sync attempts, taking up space on the drive, but not visible in the library. How much space does iTunes report for Other? Excluding files placed manually & intentionally on the iPod, "other" is typically an overhead of 1%-2% of the size of the media and represents the iPod database, artwork, games etc. If you have significantly larger amounts of "other" then you will need to restore your iPod in order to reclaim the space.
    tt2

  • Manually schedulled cycle count items are not coming in cycle count listing

    We had scheduled some items for manual cycle counting for particular date. But those are not getting generated in cycle count listing report or not avialble for counting.
    Checkpoints done: 1. Items are cycle count enabled
    2. Those items are avialable in that Cycle count  Name
    3. Onhand is avialbe for those items in particular subinventory
    4. Cycle count scope is specific to Subinventory and that sub inv is included in the list
    Can anyone give some thoughts why those manually schedulelled items are still not getting in cycle count listing report?
    Thanks in Advance
    Avinash

    Hi Avinash,
    Can you please let us know, are you using the CC with ABC analysis?
    Thanks
    NS

  • Excise duty manual entry in PO

    Dear Experts,
         Plese Give me Solution
    Client Requirement  , They want Manual entry excise duty  deductible in the PO . But they don't want Posted that value into MIGO documents.But they want to post that value into vendor account amount.
    Example
    PO
    base value 1000 10 qty 
    excise duty deductible 10 %
    MIGO ,   inventory  10000 +
                   GR/IR clearing account 10000 -
    IN MIRO , GR/IR clearing account 10000+
                    vendor account 10100
                     excise duty            100 -
    He wants that value in MIRO, BUt not in MIGO.
    He wants posting seperately g/l account.

    I already proposed this solution. He don't want tax code . Why becasue he don.t how much excise duty . Some times , 10.02 some times 10 some times 10.06 like wise
    He told now in our client 40 tax-codes is there . but every point we create tax code using this is very critical. That's why asking manual entry in PO
    Thank u for reply
    Edited by: devarapalliravindra18 on Feb 6, 2012 9:41 AM

  • Manually set IP addresses not working as needed

    We have setup our DCHP server in that we manually not dynamically give IP addresses to workstations according to there mac addresses. But most of the time the the workstations go and get the IP addresses dynamically, and in this case most of the time we get IP conflict. Does it mean the giving IP addresses manually does not work properly in the DHCP configuration. For reasons, we need to use Manually assigned IP addresses not dynamically. And how can I trace why the manually configured workstation go and get IP addresses dynamically ?

    It should work properly. Please post your configuration.

  • SAP query Transport manual activity in Production

    All,
    Do we really need to use manual step to import the query to production system using some program ? will not be automatic as we do it normal reports ?
    Why this manual step needed ?
    Please help me to understand.
    Ram.

    Hello ,
    Please  go through this link
    How to Transport SAP Query(User Group Infoset and Query) to Quality System
    Transporting a SAP Query from DEV to PRD
    Transport of Abap Query

  • Service manual for 14-v062us Pavilion lapptop

    I need the service manual for a 14-v062us Pavilion laptop in order to change the disk drive without ruining the laptop.  An HP support person gave me http://h10032.www1.hp.com/ctg/Manual/c03918301.pdf back in Sep '14, but I foolishly thought it wouild always be there and didn't download.  Now that url returns 404 Not Found error and I'm out-of-warranty and can't even get a new url in chat!  This manual should be posted on the 14-v062us product page where it's EASY to find.  Ugh.  Help would be very much appreciated.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Super - thank you very much, I appreciate it.  Not sure why the manual id changed, but ok.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Embedding HTML file in folio causes other indesign files to be embedded into article

    For our upcoming issue we have the following files: COVER_Apr.indd COVER_horz.indd Calendar_Apr.indd Chef_Tournedos.indd Home_hybrid.indd Kristen_Campo.indd List_April.indd Look_Back.indd Masthead_Apr.indd Pam_Sherman_Touch.indd Review_Lucano.indd Sh

  • CANopen: the PC doesn't communicate with the motor controller

    Hi there, I'm new with both Labview and CANopen and I'm trying to write a RXPDO on my Linmot motor controller(VI attached). I'm using a PCI CAN Series 2 card.  My VI worked just once ; I was able for example to move the motor with the JOG commands. 

  • 802.11a/g/n optimizing for compatibility

    How to ensure maximum client compatibility and stability in 802.11a/b/g/n networks? I am running a Wireless network based on the WLC 5508 6 SW version, (with WCS mgmt) and 1142 APs. I would like a broad variety of clients, old G clients and new N cli

  • Using ftp to upload a file to Content Database

    Hi Experts, I am looking to upload the file to the Content DB using FTP. Can any one let me know if there is any API for doing this and also if there any way to upload the attributes(META data) after uploading the file using FTP. I have a tried alrea

  • Losing sound on Macbook Pro 15 late 2013

    Just bought new Macbook Pro 15 (late 2013) and found out that getting notebook awaked after sleeping mode Notebook loses sound. And I can reset problem just by restarting system. Any Ideas?