Why no support for iTunes in tiger?

Why no support for iTunes running on Tiger?
WE NEED THIS Apple!

iTunes is completely supported on Mac OS X 10.4. I used, and supported, iTunes on 10.4 for years. If it won't start on your system, something is corrupted. Let us know what version of iTunes you are trying to run and exactly what happens, including error messages if any, and someone can probably provide suggestions.  As it is, you're just asking people to guess.
Regards.

Similar Messages

  • Does anyone have a phone number to actually call support for itunes store

    does anyone have a phone number to actually call support for itunes store

    You're probably right - however I only stumbled in here yesterday through Google, I'd not visited the site before and really only registered to say "me too" and look for an answer.
    I've never been a huge Apple fan, but when I finally moved to an iPod from Creative and Sony players last year, I was quite impressed. So much so that I also upgraded to an iPhone this year. Never had previous experience of trouble with iTunes and believed Apple's hype about reliability - lesson learnt!
    I've found no answers here or from Apple themselves so I probably won't be back - and the iPad and Macbook will come out of my wish list!

  • Why No Support For HP hd7500s Personal Media Drive?

    I have a Personal Media Drive hd7500s (750 gb), installed in the equipment bay,  that my HP Pavillion has stopped recognizing.  There is power to the drive as indicated by the lights on the front.  General Troubleshooting info at this site suggests I attempt to hook it up as an external drive, using the USB connection.  Before I can, however, the USB port on the back of the personal media drive appears to have a plastic protective cap on the USB contacts; but I am wary of using any more plier force than I've already applied to remove this unsuccessfully.  So I went to this site looking for tech data on my drive.
    No matter how many different ways I enter the SKU, the model number, even the serial number of this HP Personal Media Drive, the search returns nothing.  What gives??

    Apparently HP does not offer support for this device. Seems pretty bad as I purchased mine about a year ago and if I had known HP was not going to support it I would not have purchased it....SUPRISE, I guess that is why they did not tell me!!!

  • Why no support for Nightblade Z97

    Dear Sir or Madam,
    I'm MSI Nightblade Z97 owner.
    Why there is no utility and BIOS support for Nightblade Z97 ?
    It has MSI Z97I Gaming AC mobo with Nightblade BIOS.
    I can't install and use utilities like MSI Command Center, because software does not support the motherboard. Probably due to Nightblade BIOS.
    The support tab on Nightblade Z97's page does not even contains any driver updates and only contains Dragon Fan utility, that is ridiculous.
    I wish it had the same BIOS with the MSI Z97I Gaming AC mobo, so i could get the latest BIOS updates and utilities.
    Sincerely.

    Not really expecting to get an answer to my question (Can I use the Gaming AC's BIOS for the Nightblade?) from the super users here so I e-mailed MSI support. Here's the response...
    Quote
    Dear Customer,
    We don't suggest the behaviour.
    The BIOS on our Nightblade webpage particular made for the barebone. We have specific code on the BIOS.
    I managed to install the latest BIOS (version 1.90) for the MSI Nightblade Z97 days ago without any problems. Still curious about the MSI Z97i Gaming BIOS so I tried installing it via a bootable flash drive. Unfortunately, the BIOS file cannot be installed as it's not even recognized. So you can only install a BIOS customized for the Nightblade even if the Nightblade motherboard itself is labeled as MSI Z97i Gaming motherboard.

  • Has Apple Dropped Match Support for iTune 10?

    Over the weekend, my MacBook Pro running Mountain Lion and iTune 10 (sorry, I like iTune DJ too much to give it up) was showing all my non-local Match music as grayed out. I tried the usual trick of turning off Match, then turning it on again, but instead of fixing the problem, all the grayed-out songs disappeared completely. I also tried quitting and restarting iTunes, rebooting the Mac, holding the Shift key while turning off Match, deauthorizing and reauthorizing the Mac at the iTunes store, and signing out and signing back with my iTunes Apple ID. Throughout the whole process, the cloud icon next to Music has either been cycling or displaying a lightning bolt (can't connect to iCloud) icon.
    I brought it in to work with me this morning, to see if its behavior would change on a different wifi network. Nothing has changed. Also, my Mac Pro (likewise running Mountain Lion and iTunes 10) now also displays the lightning bolt, and none of the music I've uploaded to Match appears to be in iCloud—even the music I just ripped from vinyl and uploaded last Friday. Deleting a song file from the iTunes Music folder and trying to play it on the Mac Pro prompts a message "The song "songtitle" could not be used because the original file could not be found. Would you like to locate it?"
    Clearly, as of this past weekend, Match is no longer working on either of my Macs. The files I uploaded last Friday do, however, appear as ready to play on my iPad. So it's obviously not a server problem.
    Anybody know if this is a recent, unannounced development? Thanks for any info.

    Thanks, Brett, but I tried all those troubleshooting options with no improvement. I discovered that my Mac Pro would upload songs to Match as expected, but not recognize their status in the cloud nor play them if a local song file was deleted from the computer. The only solution I could find was to download iTunes 12 and bid a fond farewell to iTunes DJ. It was either that or simply not renew my Match subscription when it comes due next month. No sense paying for a feature that Apple has discontinued support for in my preferred version of iTunes.

  • Is there Tech Support for ITunes?

    Is there tech support somewhere for ITunes or are the discussion lists it?

    Thank you! Actually someone already answered my questions. I thought ITunes was the place to go to buy music videos and audios for handheld devices, but I was wrong apparently! It's only for IPODS and for watching/listening on the PC.
    I wanted music videos for my PDA (uses Windows Media Player) and music audios (MP3s?) for my phone, and I thought I could buy them here.
    I didn't realize that ITunes was it's own little Apple prison where music videos and songs have to remain - and in a format that my devices won't play.
    I don't want to sit and watch them on my PC -- I want to take them with me on my PDA and my phone.
    I suppose I will have to make my own.

  • How can i talk to a body about support for Itunes account? Itunes is not recognizing my email address or password?

    Can anyone help with my Itunes problem? Suddenly I can't sign in with my password, I have clicked on the link "forgot password" and followed the prompts.
    It then gives me a window that says an email has been sent to me but I don't get any emails. I sent a note to support and they are sending a window back to me saying that they don't recognize my email address. Seems like I'm caught in a loop!

    Was it this support?
    iTunes Store Support
    http://www.apple.com/emea/support/itunes/contact.html

  • Why no support for the Leica M9 in LR 2.6 RC?

    Hi - bemused that there's no support for the M9 in this release (especially as LR is bundled with the M9).  Even more confusing as the Standard Adobe calibration profile for the M9 that comes with the LR3 Beta is pretty good (beats the embedded profile that comes with the Leica DNGs) - and this can be added to the LR2.5 profile library with a bit of copying and pasting.
    I'd be grateful to hear from Adobe if there's any chance of a good M9 profile making it to the 2.6 final version.  Seems a shame to miss this opportunity.
    Thanks
    Chris Tribble

    Hello Chris,
    thanks for the nice feedback.
    For the moment, I will use LR for the fast preview of all images, 
    cataloging etc., and RawDeveloper for the fine tuning, as often as the 
    image permit it.
    (sorry for my english!)
    Lets hope that we will get through all that without loosing our 
    perfectly nice temper !
    All the best to you,
    Alain
    Le 11 déc. 09 à 09:39, Chris_Tribble a écrit :
    Alain - 1eme - je suis un particulier - aucun fonction chez Adobe.  
    Aussi -
    je m'excuse d'avant pour mon Francais bottant et sans elegance! Je 
    n'ai
    jamais fais des etuded en francais - et aussi mon clavier anglais 
    manquent
    les diacritiques...
    >
    Quelque petit reponses.
    >
    >>>> First I have installed the 2.6 version, that is said to work
    >>>> alongside the 2.5... but of course, it has replaced it. How to
    >>>> reinstall the 2.5 alongside, hase they have the same name ?
    >>>
    >>> C'est pas la peine - 2.6 est meilleur - vous pouvez rester
    >> avec ca...
    >
    >> ok, mais c'est tout de même juste le contraire de ce que
    >> disent sur le site Adobe vos notes d'installation (rien de
    >> très neuf non plus en cette matière, hélas, quant aux infos
    >> approximatives ou manquantes d'Adobe)
    >
    CT: Pas vrais je crois - Version 3 beta peut co-exister - mais 2.6 
    doit
    remplacer 2.5...
    >
    >>>> And then, I have tried to find a M9 profile, read your
    >> posts, do my
    >>>> job, install the beta 3.0, fond the "M9 Digital Camera Adobe
    >>>> Standard.dcp", put a copy of that in any cameraRaw description
    >>>> files... and so what ? In 2.6, I only have the choice between
    >>>> "embeded" (=incorporé in french) and "Adobe standard" when
    >> I select a
    >>>> M9 dng file / but I've more choice when I select a M8 dng
    >> file (ACR
    >>>> 4.4, ACR 3.6, Adobe standard, Adobe standard beta 2,
    >> camera standard,
    >>>> camera standard beta 2).
    >>>> 1. Do I miss something ?
    >>>> 2. what should I do to find and use the M9 specific profile ?
    >>>>
    >>
    >>>> Encore une fois - il n'y a pas de probleme...
    >>> "Adobe Standard" marche tres bien...
    >> moui... si vous le dites... mais il me convient assez mal, et
    >> j'aimerais tout de même comprendre pourquoi je ne peux pas
    >> charger un profil correspondant à mon M9... je ne comprends
    >> pas non plus pourquoi il n'y a pas de profil par optique
    >> développé par Leica... et en Suisse, personne de chez eux ne
    >> peut répondre à ces questions... alors même que LR 2.5 est
    >> livré en bundle avec le m9!
    >
    CT: Alors - Adobe Standard EST le profil developé par Adobe pour le 
    M9 - et
    c'est le meme qu'on trouve dans LR 3 beta.  Selon mon experience c'est
    meilleur que le "embedded profile".  Pas parfait, mais pas mal non 
    plus
    Vous pouvez vous meme telecharger le DNG editor
    (http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles).
    >
    >
    >> je suis professionnel, et très loin d'être heureux avec LR...
    >> (ni avec aucun raw developper, pour être franc, ni
    >> captureOne, ni... encore que justement, RawDevelopper a des
    >> qualités intéressantes - à côté de grande faiblesses... mais
    >> c'est encore un autre sujet)
    >>
    >> mais j'ai bien l'intention de m'accrocher, ne serait-ce que
    >> pour la puissance de gestion/catalogage et l'interface de
    >> LR... quoi que je n'ai aucune confiance en son bricolage des
    >> dng -> donc multiplier les backups des fichiers tels que
    >> sortis du m9, etc... on dirait bien que malgré 15 ans
    >> d'expérience, nous en soyons toujours au balbutiements du digital !
    >>
    >> C'est tout de même plus sérieux (du point de vue des
    >> résultats) du côté de Leaf (j'utilise un L75 sur Alpa
    >> 12SWA)... ça ressemble à quelque chose, mais en petit format,
    >> après le m8, le m9 est vraiment encore loin du compte ! Et
    >> leur développeur, bien sûr, ne développe... que leurs
    >> fichiers propriétaires. Lorsque quelqu'un aura décidé dans
    >> quelques années que leur format .mos est dépassé, mon travail
    >> sera tout simplement perdu. Sauf à convertir en catastrophe
    >> quelques dizaines ou centaines de milliers de fichiers ?
    >> Encourageant, n'est-ce pas ?
    >>
    >>> By the way, I also had this blue pixels lines in the 2500iso
    >>>>
    >>>> files... anyway to save back the file without this bug ?
    >>>
    >>> Je ne vois pas cette image .... Peut etre vous pourriez
    >> m'envoyer par
    >>> email? (mailto:mailto:mailto:[email protected])
    >> Je ne l'ai malheureusement pas avec moi, sur mon portable, et
    >> n'y accéderai plus avant quelques jours...
    >>
    >> Leica Suisse (avec qui je suis en relation directe et qui a reçu ce
    >> fichier) vient de m'appeler et ils reconnaissent - enfin - le
    >> problème.
    >> Mais ils ne savent toujours pas si et comment il vont le résoudre.
    >> Rien avant l'année prochaine, quoi qu'il en soit, et ce sera
    >> fixé, selon eux, soit :
    >> - par un nouveau firmware (difficile à croire)
    >> - par un passage de l'appareil entre leur mains, avec modif/
    >> remplacement d'une partie du soft/hardware
    >> - par un échange d'appareil (!!!) si c'est le capteur qui est
    >> en cause (l'un de mes M8.2 avait été échangé de même à leur
    >> frais après 3 mois, pour d'autres problèmes électroniques) Le
    >> problème de ces lignes de pixels bleus sur certaines prises
    >> de vue en haute sensibilité est largement débattu sur les
    >> forums, et Leica vient de comprendre qu'il n'est pas
    >> extérieur au M9, comme ils le disaient il n'y a pas si
    >> longtemps... encore une petite bombe à leur actif !
    >> Dite-moi si ça vous intéresse et je vous les ferai suivre...
    >
    CT: J'avais un tel probleme avec le M8.2 - chez le M9 pour le moment 
    ca
    marche!
    >>
    >> Par ailleurs, ils viennent de me proposer de repasser toutes
    >> mes optiques au banc (codées par leurs soins il y a moins
    >> d'un an) pour les ajuster une nouvelle fois au mieux au m9...
    >> là aussi, ils reconnaissent des failles techniques sérieuses
    >> ! J'ai par exemple un summicron 35 asph parfait sur film et
    >> sur m8, qui est... flou (sur les bords, et irrégulièrement)
    >> sur mon m9 ! Interressant...
    >>
    CT: c'est vrais que les boittier numerique sont plus exigeant - je 
    conseil
    un contact direct avec Leica a Solms.... Et aussi (si vous n'y etes 
    pas
    inscrit deja) que vous faites appelle pour rejoindre le reseau Leica
    Professional.  Ca vaut la peine et augment le vitesse de reparation...
    >
    >>> Je vous conseiller aussi de visiter L-camera forum...
    >>> (http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m9-forum/
    >>> ) Vous y trouverez des francophones la bas et il y a beaucoup de
    >>> bonnes informations...
    >> je connaissais, mais les questions en français trouvent
    >> rarement de l'écho... et le niveau technique n'est
    >> malheureusement pas très élevé, malgré la gentillesse des
    >> interlocuteurs.
    >>
    >
    Oui!  MAIS j'ai appris des choses la bas ...
    >
    >>> Bon courage!
    >>> Chris
    >>
    >> Il en faut, en effet...
    >> merci en tout cas !
    >> (à propos, quelle est votre fonction chez adobe ? Puis-je
    >> reprendre contact avec vous lors de mes prochaines
    >> découvertes ?) Amitiés, Alain
    >>
    Encore une fois - bon courage..
    >
    Dr Christopher Tribble
    MOBILE     || +44 (0)7917 473522
    EMAIL     || mailto:[email protected]
    WEB     || www.ctribble.co.uk
    >

  • Why no support for AI assets in Edge?

    I mean why PS assets?
    Many of us left FW behind and migrated to AI because AI is vector based, supports SVG import, and CSS export, but now it looks like all the new stuff like Edge seem to be focusing on integration with PS? What the?

    iTunes is completely supported on Mac OS X 10.4. I used, and supported, iTunes on 10.4 for years. If it won't start on your system, something is corrupted. Let us know what version of iTunes you are trying to run and exactly what happens, including error messages if any, and someone can probably provide suggestions.  As it is, you're just asking people to guess.
    Regards.

  • TS1717 I foolishly downloaded the latest version of iTunes and now it won't run.  I get a message stating that MSVCR.dll is missing and an error message saying error 7 (Windows error 126).  Click on the support link for iPod + iTunes - no support for iTun

    Why won't the latest version of iTunes run?  I've downloaded it twice.  Come to that, why isn't iTunes an option in the product list on this site?  Apple did make that, didn't they?

    Hey Jim Tracy!
    Here is an article that will help you resolve this issue with your iTunes:
    iTunes 11.1.4 for Windows: Unable to install or open
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS5376
    Thanks for being a part of the Apple Support Communities!
    Regards,
    Braden

  • Support for itunes plus file transfer / playback

    The lastest Nokia Media Transfer application for the mac allows the transfer of itunes plus (.m4a extension) files, these are purchased itunes tracks without DRM. From what I understand apple have modified the tag data on these files which prevents them from being played on a Nokia phone, the Mac transfer application will process these files to modify this data and allow the tracks to be played.
    My question is, will windows users get a similar application, to avoid the use of third party / manual operations, to allow these files to be transferred directly from itunes to my Nokia in the same manner as the mac application?
    Its usually the mac being the un-supported OS but appears to be windows in this case !

    yeah, Apple have their own way of working with aac/mp4 tags. They add extra bits that other players, unless programmed to read, won't understand, and at worst they won't play the file at all. There is another standard, the Nero standard, and they are similar but the Nero version is more universally recognised. There isn't an ID3v1/ID3v2 for MP4 files, yet. Although, like I said, since 90% of the world uses the Apple method of tagging, that is close enough to being a standard.
    It's not that Nokia don't want you using iTunes, or like you said, they would force Mac users to use a Nokia music program. I think it is just that the whole "PC Suite" philosophy is geared around the Windows Media Player way of doing and tagging things. And since WMP doesn't recognise m4a files, neither does the Nokias. To get around this, instead of fixing their mp4 codecs to recognise Apple formatting, they made a transfer program that swaps the tags to a Nokia-understandable format. Which is just silly.
    I've tried the Suite Music Manager, I have. Honest opinion - use Windows Media player instead. BUT I don't want to use that either, I have a huge collection ripped/catalogued in iTunes, and I shouldn't have to go about fiddling with tags and swapping software/workflows just so my phone can play it. I don't need to with MP3 so why should I need to with AAC/MP4? It would only take a few lines of code in the phone's AAC codec for it to read these tags, surely thats easier than making transfer programs and Music Managers?
    The arguement "Nokia want you buying from the Nokia store rather than iTMS" doesn't hold water either, because I'm never buying from either, as long as I can still buy CDs from the shop.
    Like I said, this whole thing may be fixed with the new N95-8 etc. If its not, and Nokia have no intention of fixing it, then my next phone will be an iPhone. I don't WANT an iPhone, but this whole thing is a deal-breaker for me.
    Currently using E71, looking at options

  • Support for iTunes folders?

    Anyone know when Apple will support iTunes folders on an iPod?
    It was a great feature addition with iTunes allowed me to organize my music in a folder structure so that, for example, I could put all Beatles music together. Unforunately, none of this carries over to the iPod, so you end with with lots of duplicate playlists that say "Greatest Hits". Yes, I suppose I could back through and change all my playlists under folders to say something like "Beatles - Greatest Hits", but that just defeats the purpose of the folder structure.
    What good is having folders in iTunes if they don't carry over to your iPod? Anyone know when Apple is going to fix this?

    I'm getting a DNLA error on the upper right hand corner of the SP3 screen.
    Also my art work is there on iTunes but a lot is missing with the Media Hub.
    I also think for a product to be called "The Media Hub" that the option to play your music should be robust. 
    As most people by this to run Itunes I'm surprised that the setup is not better.  
    The conflict with their shadow software and what it takes on from a "personal" folder is nuts.
    Why do I want my word documents and gif and jpeg files in my documents folders mixed in with my Photos that I want to view.
    Now the Media Hubbhas multiple folders and directors and content I don't want on it.
    It also now has multiple instances of Itunes and it still doed nor get iTune "right"
    I could have saved $350.00 by just placing a hard drive with a CAT5 cable to the back of my router,  What a mess!!!  Who has the time for this????

  • Windows 8 support for iTunes 11

    I have seen a bit of concern around iTunes support under Windows 8.
    I have updated everything ready to upgrade a Win7 Professional PC to Win8 Pro
    I have updated iTunes to 11.0.2 64 bit.
    My question is....does the current version of iTunes (i.e. 11.0.2 64 bit) support Windows 8?
    I am not doing a clean install of Windows 8, it is not practical at all...upgrade is the only reasonable approach.
    I need iTunes for iPad & iPhone so it needs to work under Windows 8 before I upgrade
    So would be interested in knowing whether latest version of iTunes does really support Windows 8.
    It is a absolute show stopper for upgrading to Windows 8!

    Had the same issue on Windows 8.1(x64)  8(x64) 7(x64) and Vista(x86) with the latest iTunes. Removing and Reinstalling all Apple applications did not solve it. After installation and starting iTunes i would just get the end user agreement and then nothing but iTunes.exe process is running as background process without the GUI being displayed. I did notice that after an hour or 2 iTunes would then be open but would immediately freeze when connecting my iPad.
    Changed the properties of running iTunes.exe as admin in Win7 compatibilty mode.
    So launch iTunes and wait till it eventually opens, do not connect your iOS device right away, but sign in with your Apple ID first.
    Open preferences (iTunes seemed to freeze again but preferences window popped up after a couple minutes)
    Unchecked the automatic sync.
    After doing that I have been able to connect my iPad which I had already upgraded to iOS7 over the air. Which was risky as I do not have a MAC and iTunes is the only way to perform a restore if the upgrade would have failed.
    But still 11.1 seems to be very unstable on Windows, I can imagine that Apple will focus on sorting the bugs in iOS7 for their own devices first but hope they will investigate the issue and come up with a solution later on, as I do think a substantial amount of iTunes for Windows users buy their Music through iTunes and it would not be wise of Apple to leave them in the dark.

  • Why no support for 3560 Compact series in CNA?

    Is there reason why WS-C3560C-8PC-S and WS-C3560C-12PC-S is not supported in Cisco Network Assistent?
    According to the data sheets for these switches CNA should be supported. I saw another forum post stating that the Gigabit versions has been added to the supported list as of version 5.7.
    "The Cisco Catalyst 3560-C and 2960-C Series compact switches offer both the traditional Cisco CLI for detailed configuration and Cisco Network Assistant software, a PC-based tool for quick configuration based on preset templates."
    Best regards
    Markus

    Please reference the Release Notes for 5.7. They indicate:
    With Network Assistant 5.7, you can:
    •Manage these devices:
    –Catalyst 3560-C switches (WS-C3560CG-8PC-S,WS-C3560CG-8TC-S, and WS-C3560CPD-8PT-S)
    Hard to say why the 12-port model isn't listed. It could be an oversight in the release notes. Have you pointed a CNA 5.7 at one to check?

  • Why no support for GeForce GFX 750 Ti specifically?

    Today I received and installed my brand new GeForce GFX 750 Ti, specifically bought for being able to use After Effects properly. My last card was an ATI/AMD FirePro which has no CUDA and thus couldn't use Ae. So I was using it CPU only! Which is total madness.
    I was extremely disappointed to realize that my new GPU also isn't used almost at all, and that it's just as slow as my CPU-only! There is... no difference. I expected the difference to be like night and day.
    Yes, I have the latest correct driver.
    Yes, I have verified that other things using the GPU indeed are much faster.
    I have looked through all the settings in After Effects and tried to make it use the GPU, but it just won't. I then saw on some page of compatible cards that Adobe lists all of them except for my card (basically). I didn't believe my eyes. I had no idea such a list even existed, and I especially didn't think that "certain models" of the same brand and model series of graphics cards would not be supported. It makes no sense. Both weaker and more powerful cards in the same damn series are supported, but not my card specifically? That's... unbelievable.
    This has got to be a case of them simply having not yet tested my card well enough to call it "support", but it still sounds fishy to me as my card definitely has CUDA and is rather powerful. Much more powerful than other cards supported. It doesn't make sense to me.
    Of course, I have it set to "use GPU anyway", but again... it doesn't seem to be used. This kills me. What is preventing Ae from using my card?

    Glitchness wrote:
    Why didn't you consult with Grympy Man Leeroy whether or not your shoes are approved to walk past his house? Because it's a completely absurd thing?
    That's not the same thing at all. Grumpy Man Leroy has no control or anything to do with the sidewalk outside of his property, but if you are purchasing hardware specifically to be used for a piece of software, it would make sense to check the technical specs of that software. This is not absurd; it is common sense. I wouldn't go buy a new engine for my Jeep Wrangler without checking to see if that cool Corvette engine would even fit with the rest of the powertrain in the Jeep. Even a quick check of the AE tech specs page would have told you about the graphics card requirements.
    As a side note: There are a lot of (much higher-end) software packages out there that are a lot pickier about their hardware than After Effects.
    But let's let the past be in the past. Let's try to solve your problem. (Is returning the card and getting a proper one out of the question?)
    Assuming you can't exchange the card, what version of After Effects are you using? As I hope you know, AE really only uses CUDA on the GPU for one thing: acceleration of the ray-traced renderer.
    If you're using CC, you can ignore the ray-traced renderer completely. There is a version of C4D that ships with After Effects now (which is huge news). It renders better (and faster) than AE's ray-traced renderer. It's a much, much, much better way to do 3d in After Effects. Make sure you update to the latest version (12.2.1.5 is the latest on as of today).
    If you're using CS6, what exact version number are you using? Perhaps updating to 11.0.4 will fix your problem.

Maybe you are looking for