Why orders gets locked in Queue's

Dear all,
Could you please help me to know why orders gets locked on Queue's as well SMCL trasaction.
what is the route cause for that? and is there any why we can unlcok automatically with a program?
please suggest me.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Shaik

Hi Shaik,
Orders you are seeing in SMCL transaction is Cross System Locks. When Scenario A is activated, then Cross System Locks must be activated. This locks will be released automatically from the system when the transaction is completed successfully in ECC & CRM.
You are not supposed to remove the locks for the orders from SMCL transaction directly. First analyze the issue with the order. If any issue in order replication from CRM to ECC or vice versa Cross system lock will not release automatically.
For example, from SMCL take one order and analyze the order in ECC & CRM, definately you should see the difference in ECC and CRM order.
Some times Cross System Locks will not be released, if updates are not coming to CRM from ECC, better check filters in SALESDOCUMENT middleware object for the sales document types.
Regards,
Bhanu

Similar Messages

User id getting locked everyday

Dear All,
User Id getting locked everyday having profile SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW.I m not getting any clue why its getting locked everyday.
I tried to check RFC and background job job also but i m not able to find.everyday i have to unlock it.
Kindly suggest me how to check.
Regards
Adil

Hi,
Such issue mostly happens due to wrong attempt of login in SAP system client with that SAP User id either through RFC login, external- program, script,etc...
If you have checked all the RFCs login settings and not able to found the login attempt, then Enable [SAP Security audit log|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/c7/69bcb7f36611d3a6510000e835363f/content.htm] using SM19, SM20 and analyze the logs for that SAP User id only.
Regards,
Bhavik G. Shroff

RFC_USER getting locked

Hi,
RFC_USER are frequently getting locked .
How to find In which RFC RFC_USER password is wrogly maintain ?
which background job locking RFC_USER
why RFC_USER getting locked frequently ?
REgards
M

You may not get the sufficient information from SM21. Try ti check the RFC trace it might help you a bit. Other possible solution is you need to check manually the RFC connection which is maintaining this users and maintain the correct password
Previously we had the same scenario RFC user getting locked due to incorrect password maintained.( after investigated so much we created the Newuser for this RFC and maintained the password)
Thanks Regards,
Avinash I

WBS gets locked

Hi all,
I have one Z-program which posts accounting document using function module "BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST". Program posts no. of documents.
Also before calling this bapi I am using function module 'STATUS_READ' to read the System Statuses for the WBS element.
When the program executes WBS gets locked for whole duration of the program.
For any project management posting screen for example releasing or changing budgets [CJ30 / CJ32] people get an error message telling them that person X is already processing the WBS. This message stays in force until the Program finishes.
Any idea why WBS gets locked? How can we avoid it?
Regards,
Umesh

Hi Umesh,
Please try BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT and pass WAIT = 'X'. This should solve the issue.
Thanks
Anand

Why did the thread get locked or deleted?

Disclaimer: Apple does not necessarily endorse any suggestions, solutions, or third-party software products that may be mentioned in the topic below. Apple encourages you to first seek a solution at Apple Support. The following links are provided as is, with no guarantee of the effectiveness or reliability of the information. Apple does not guarantee that these links will be maintained or functional at any given time. Use the information below at your own discretion.
Occasionally you may see a thread get locked or deleted, or the possibility of a user having been banned. This tip is a viewpoint of an end user of how the Terms of Use apply to deletions, locks, or bans. Moderators may at their discretion choose these actions as the Terms of Use allow them to, even when none of these points below matter.
When you signed up on this board, a Terms of Use page was agreed to in order for you to enter. That Terms of Use page is also on the link "Help & Terms of Use" on the right hand side. Posts themselves may get deleted that weren't the source of the thread being locked or deleted. So if you didn't disobey the Terms of use, someone else might have.
Do not take either as a sign of censorship, a sign of personal chastisement, or anything negative per say. This is after all a community open to the public.
When one of the terms of use is violated, it is either because it does not offer constructive points of view for fixing a technical issue from end user to end user, or it is overly digressive from doing such actions. Terms of use suggest to avoid:
1. Prognosticating.
2. Guessing Apple's policy.
3. Offer advice on something which may be against copyright laws.
4. Offer advice on something which would violate a license agreement.
5. Posting in a thread with "me toos". Try to solve the problem at hand. It makes it very hard for those of us trying to help the original poster when additional people chime in, saying they too have the same problem, or have a problem almost identical. Those trying to help
the original poster, may not know if the solution applies to all the people having the problem, or just some. It ends up requiring people coming to help to directly address a person to avoid confusing who should follow various advice.
A Post New Topic is available at all Forum levels, but at the Category level of Discussions. For more on this discussion, see the tip here:
http://discussions.apple.com/ann.jspa?annID=650
6. Other things which may be illegal in the State of California or in the United States of America
should not be suggested or inferred by what you post.
7. Rants or complaints about people and companies.
They are unhelpful, and really don't solve technical issues.
Approach complaints with tact when posting in a public forum that is moderated such as this one.
It is one thing to say, I hate this feature being missing, is there any way to get this feature added, or are there any ways of getting it from another source?
It is another thing to blame Apple for a feature that is missing, and drop the ball at that waiting for a response. These type of posts are more likely to be frowned upon.
Complaining of a service not rendered is also often frowned upon. There are points of contact later in this tip to address such service issues. This is a forum for addressing technical inquiries about how things work or if things can be made to work on your system.
8. Polls asking for a feature to be added/removed are generally frowned upon, as well as polls about various apparent defects and their propensity. You are only addressing less than 1% of the Apple using population here.
Such polls would not be very scientific even if they are carried out for long periods of time. Long threads may appear to act as polls, and may violate terms of use. If you see such a thread and wonder why it hasn't been locked or deleted, you are welcome to ask that in Discussions Feedback, or click on "Report This Post" at the bottom right corner if available.
As the Terms of Use state, in the end essentially it is up to the moderator to decide if a thread is worthy being deleted or locked. Don't take it personally if it is. Also Level 2 through Level 5 users, while we can ask the moderators look at a thread, we are not Apple Employees. You may also ask a moderator look at a thread or an individual on the Discussion Feedback forum or by clicking Report this post at the bottom right hand corner of a specific post.
If the purpose of your thread is to provide feedback to Apple for a product, see these pages:
http://www.apple.com/contact/
http://www.apple.com/feedback/
http://www.apple.com/contact/feedback.html
If you have isolated a bug with a procedure worthy of a software developer, sign up for a free developer account on http://developer.apple.com/ and report the bug here:
http://bugreporter.apple.com/
As this is a user to user forum answers may not come right away. Have patience, and usually someone eventually can come up with an answer. Some forums may not fit the subject line of your topic, and you are welcome to ask if you are unsure where to post a topic.
This is the 2nd version of this tip. It was submitted on September 28, 2010 by a brody.
Do you want to provide feedback on this User Contributed Tip or contribute your own? If you have achieved Level 2 status, visit the User Tips Library Contributions forum for more information.

Disclaimer: Apple does not necessarily endorse any suggestions, solutions, or third-party software products that may be mentioned in the topic below. Apple encourages you to first seek a solution at Apple Support. The following links are provided as is, with no guarantee of the effectiveness or reliability of the information. Apple does not guarantee that these links will be maintained or functional at any given time. Use the information below at your own discretion.
Occasionally you may see a thread get locked or deleted, or the possibility of a user having been banned. This tip is a viewpoint of an end user of how the Terms of Use apply to deletions, locks, or bans. Moderators may at their discretion choose these actions as the Terms of Use allow them to, even when none of these points below matter.
When you signed up on this board, a Terms of Use page was agreed to in order for you to enter. That Terms of Use page is also on the link "Help & Terms of Use" on the right hand side. Posts themselves may get deleted that weren't the source of the thread being locked or deleted. So if you didn't disobey the Terms of use, someone else might have.
Do not take either as a sign of censorship, a sign of personal chastisement, or anything negative per say. This is after all a community open to the public.
When one of the terms of use is violated, it is either because it does not offer constructive points of view for fixing a technical issue from end user to end user, or it is overly digressive from doing such actions. Terms of use suggest to avoid:
1. Prognosticating.
2. Guessing Apple's policy.
3. Offer advice on something which may be against copyright laws.
4. Offer advice on something which would violate a license agreement.
5. Posting in a thread with "me toos". Try to solve the problem at hand. It makes it very hard for those of us trying to help the original poster when additional people chime in, saying they too have the same problem, or have a problem almost identical. Those trying to help
the original poster, may not know if the solution applies to all the people having the problem, or just some. It ends up requiring people coming to help to directly address a person to avoid confusing who should follow various advice.
A Post New Topic is available at all Forum levels, but at the Category level of Discussions. For more on this discussion, see the tip here:
http://discussions.apple.com/ann.jspa?annID=650
6. Other things which may be illegal in the State of California or in the United States of America
should not be suggested or inferred by what you post.
7. Rants or complaints about people and companies.
They are unhelpful, and really don't solve technical issues.
Approach complaints with tact when posting in a public forum that is moderated such as this one.
It is one thing to say, I hate this feature being missing, is there any way to get this feature added, or are there any ways of getting it from another source?
It is another thing to blame Apple for a feature that is missing, and drop the ball at that waiting for a response. These type of posts are more likely to be frowned upon.
Complaining of a service not rendered is also often frowned upon. There are points of contact later in this tip to address such service issues. This is a forum for addressing technical inquiries about how things work or if things can be made to work on your system.
8. Polls asking for a feature to be added/removed are generally frowned upon, as well as polls about various apparent defects and their propensity. You are only addressing less than 1% of the Apple using population here.
Such polls would not be very scientific even if they are carried out for long periods of time. Long threads may appear to act as polls, and may violate terms of use. If you see such a thread and wonder why it hasn't been locked or deleted, you are welcome to ask that in Discussions Feedback, or click on "Report This Post" at the bottom right corner if available.
As the Terms of Use state, in the end essentially it is up to the moderator to decide if a thread is worthy being deleted or locked. Don't take it personally if it is. Also Level 2 through Level 5 users, while we can ask the moderators look at a thread, we are not Apple Employees. You may also ask a moderator look at a thread or an individual on the Discussion Feedback forum or by clicking Report this post at the bottom right hand corner of a specific post.
If the purpose of your thread is to provide feedback to Apple for a product, see these pages:
http://www.apple.com/contact/
http://www.apple.com/feedback/
http://www.apple.com/contact/feedback.html
If you have isolated a bug with a procedure worthy of a software developer, sign up for a free developer account on http://developer.apple.com/ and report the bug here:
http://bugreporter.apple.com/
As this is a user to user forum answers may not come right away. Have patience, and usually someone eventually can come up with an answer. Some forums may not fit the subject line of your topic, and you are welcome to ask if you are unsure where to post a topic.
This is the 2nd version of this tip. It was submitted on September 28, 2010 by a brody.
Do you want to provide feedback on this User Contributed Tip or contribute your own? If you have achieved Level 2 status, visit the User Tips Library Contributions forum for more information.

Reasoning for Queues getting Locked

Hello,
When we are doing load testing ,queues are getting locked. Is there any reason why queues get locked? and secondly how can we tune the queues so that they dont get locked in high load conditions?
Thank You.

Hi Ram,
Tune the parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT to handle queues during high load.
Set the value 0 - 2,097,151 (KB)....The parameter EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT enables serial processing of messages of a particular
size. This applies for messages with the quality of service Exactly Once (EO). If the message is larger than the parameter
value, the message is processed in a separate queue.This parameter is designed to improve performance since there is often
not enough memory to process multiple large messages simultaneously.
Regds,
Pinangshuk.

Purchase Order is getting locked

Hi Experts,
I have very strange problem with some of purchase orders.
I create the purchase order and saved it.
When i tried to chenge purchase order system does not respond and dont allow me to save the order.
Transaction gets locked which can be seen in SM12 tcode also.
Also when i tried to release the PO system again performs the same way and trasaction gets locked.
I checked the release strategy, customization, material and vendor master, also the authorizations..
Basis person also checked it but couldnt able to locate any specific reason.
In every PO i faced the problem Material and Vendor is same.
Waht could be the reason thet transactions are getting locked when working with these POs , any specific things to be checked , configuration, or Notes to be applied.
Please guide me in this as i am not able to process these very important POs.
Best Regards,
Kapil

Hello Kapil
Can you check under System -- User profile -- Own data, under this check under 'Parameters' tab what are the parameters set for your login?
Amol

An order is getting lock instead of all the configuration set right

Hi gurus tell me i raise a ticket pls let me kno_w**
" An order is getting lock instead of all the configuration set right. "

Welcome to the forum.
The message whatever you had provided is not enough. Anyway, check in XD05 whether the customer is blocked. Else give the error message number.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Why did the text plan topic below get locked??? Was waiting for answer...

What's up with that...I was waiting for an answer from the ATT rep...why did it get locked?

iTweaker wrote:
When I said courtesy, I meant to let people know WHY something was locked down or deleted. I thought they could do this as a courtesy to the people who posted, instead of leaving them wondering what happened and why their thread was stopped.
Thanks for your suggestion, I'll search for the ATT forum.
I believe that the person who provides the first reply to the OP's question receives an email from the mods informing them that the thread has been locked. They may sometimes give the reason for this, but often not. Not sure why it seems not to go to the OP?

Why does itunes get locked with last update after clicking on search button ?

Why does itunes get locked with last update after clicking on search button ?

Why does itunes get locked with last update after clicking on search button ?

I have a problem with my new Apple Air. It usually takes few seconds for the laptop to be untouched in order to be locked. So sometimes when the screen starts to get dim in order to lock, I immediately touch the keypad to avoid locking the laptop

I have a problem with my new Apple Air. It usually takes few seconds for the laptop to be untouched in order to be locked. So, sometimes when the screen starts to get dim in order to lock, I immediately touch the keypad to avoid locking the laptop, the result is a black screen appears with no responding to anything from pressing the keyboard to pressing the touchpad. It takes few minutes for the laptop to open again and then a message appears saying that there was a problem with the lock security.
What is happening exactly?

It sounds like your sleep timers are set to too low of a value. Go to System Preferences -> Energy Saver and set both timers to longer times. The computer sleep timer should be a longer time than the display sleep timer.

Cant get Lock Mail box in use. Why this error?

Hi
I m try to display the mails in the inbox in a web page.
What i m doing is when i click the subject, it should display the content of the
mail. When i m doing it for the first time its working fine.
After that if i go back to the page and click the next mail's subject, i get an
error message like this :" Cant get lock, Mailbox in use."
Now what should i do? how do i display the content of the next mail.

Sounds like the first page gets some kind of lock on the mailbox and doesn't release it. Then the second page doesn't work because of that lock.

Why do unlocked iPhones get locked to the first carrier SIM?

I wanted to buy an unlocked iPhone 5s in the UK. I was told at Phone4U that it will get locked to the first carrier SIM which I put in!!! And I will not be able to switch!!
I am an international student and travel a lot to my home country, isn't there any way I could buy an unlocked iPhone which remains unlocked, providing me flexibility to switch carriers ??

That has been an ongoing issue with "unlocked" iPhones from CarPhones and the place you mention...the iPhones are not unlocked in the true sense. They are setup to lock to the first sim inserted for activation. There really isn't away around this, either. Only the Apple store sells truly unlocked iPhones.
For a retail store: http://www.apple.com/retail/storelist/

Blocked trying to get lock: java.io.PrintStream

hello,everybody
i have a problem with ejb deployed in weblogic 9.2
sometimes it throws exceptions as follows:
Blocked trying to get lock: java.io.PrintStream
is this io deadlock?
which is more than the configured time (StuckThreadMaxTime) of "600" seconds. Stack trace:
Thread-169 "[STUCK] ExecuteThread: '84' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" <alive, in native, suspended, blocked, priority=1, DAEMON> {
    -- Blocked trying to get lock: java.io.PrintStream@23f1a60[fat lock]
    org.hibernate.exception.NestableDelegate.printStackTrace(NestableDelegate.java:303)
    org.hibernate.exception.NestableDelegate.printStackTrace(NestableDelegate.java:292)
    org.hibernate.exception.NestableRuntimeException.printStackTrace(NestableRuntimeException.java:187)
    com.test.bean.testBusinessBean.getInforByid(testBusinessBean.java:1628)
    com.test.bean.testBusinessBean_cdq3cw_EOImpl.getInforByid(testBusinessBean_cdq3cw_EOImpl.java:2422)
    com.test.bean.testBusinessBean_cdq3cw_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
    weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:526)
    weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:210)
    weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:438)
    weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:350)
    weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:143)
    weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:386)
    weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.access$300(BasicServerRef.java:57)
    weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$BasicExecuteRequest.run(BasicServerRef.java:964)
    weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:206)
    weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
}thanks

I'm getting the same problem. What happens on my server is that sometimes when a thread tries to print a stack trace, it gets stuck at "FileOutputStream.writeBytes". All other threads will then stop at "printStackTrace" when they try to synchronize on the System.err, like yours. I have no idea why this is happening. However, I don't use weblogic or ejb, so it seems to be a more basic issue. As a workaround, I'm considering to set a custom System.err that writes all its output to a queue which then in turn gets written to the real System.err by a separate thread. That way, the worst that can happen is that that separate thread gets stuck.
This is quite annoying but I'm not sure if we have enough information yet to file a bug. I can't reproduce it yet. My server sometimes runs for weeks without this problem happening...
If anyone has updates on this, that would be much appreciated.
My system:
Java: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_02-b05, mixed mode)
OS: Debian 4.0
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Dual Core

AD account getting locked out after password change in Jabber

When user changes his network credentials and does not update them in Jabber. Jabber will still try to connect to phone services and voicemail with the old credentials which is leading to their account getting locked in AD after three attempts.
We are using Jabber 9.6.1, so a fairly new version.
Can some suggest if there is a workaround?

Hi,
We are seeing a similar issue after the user has changed their AD password the account repeatedly gets locked out when they try to log into Jabber.
We are also using Cisco IM&P and our CUCM is LDAP synced
I am interested to know why you are asking if LDAP authentication is configured?
Regards,
Andries

Why orders gets locked in Queue's

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for