Why safari takes more time in loading a page?

safari always takes much more time than other browsers..why it is so?

Similar Messages

Does anyone know why safari and firefox won't load certain pages

Hi
I can't get safari and firefox to load certain pages. For me it's a website programme that i'm using. I can get into the programme but then certain pages won't load. This suddenly happened about 3 weeks ago with Safari. I then loaded Firefox and it worked fine for a few days and now i'm having the same problem and it's the same pages that won't open. I also have trouble getting other sites to load completely, such as this site. It's so frustrating as i can't finish building my website and my laptop is only new!
Help someone, if you can
Julsea

Hi again and thanks for replying
I can go into their website, cloudaccess and use that properly. I just can't use my own website properly. When i say website, my site isn't yet built. The site i'm trying to access is the backend of joomla. I can't load it and use some of it but not all of it.
I can access the site through my old laptop (and use it fully) which is a windows one but i can't access it via this one. I thought it was a cloudaccess problem but seeing as it's only my mac i can't access it through, i'm presuming it's my computer. I also tried it through firefox and explorer on my windows laptop and it was fine. It was ok on this laptop until a few weeks ago when it suddenly wouldn't load properly

Partitioned table takes more time to load

Hi,
Recently I have been test loading a partition table (Datawarehouse fact table). However, I notice almost 2X to 2.5X jump in timing compared to the non-partitioned table.
The partition is on the TIME Key on the basis of monthly range. Since this key is not entirely consistent (less than 1% cases) and can change sometimes, I have enabled row movement.
Is there anything that you can do to improve timing when everything else remains same?
Regards
Prem

Hi,
When you load data into a partitioned table oracle has to check every record
to decide in which partition store it.
When you load data in a heap table oracle hasn't to check it. All records
are saved in the same segment.
You can save time when you load in partitioned tables using partition
clause.
Regards
K.Rajkumar

Problem loading pages on safari. Each time I load a page it seems to be trying to load the same page multiple times.

I can see the address loading repeatedly on the address line and the page itself loads repeatedly. The internet is working fine and the other programs on my macbook pro are working fine.

Go step by by step and test.
Reset Safari.
Click Safari in the menu bar.
From the drop down select "Reset Safari".
Click "Reset".
Delete Cookies
Safari > Preferences > Privacy > Cookies and other website data:
Click “Remove All Website Data”.
Empty Caches
Safari > Preference > Advanced
Checkmark the box for "Show Develop menu in menu bar".
Develop menu will appear in the Safari menu bar.
Click Develop and select "Empty Caches" from the dropdown.
Turn off Extensions if any, and launch Safari.
Safari > Preferences > Extensions

Why Safari doesn't want to load the page of an online game ?! i never had problems with that before !

Hello! my name is Arina! I have an online game that i like to play named DarkOrbit ! since the last update of Safari .. the browser says it will remember my name in the game and my password but it doesn't .. and this is just for this game, don't have this problem with Facebook or yahoo mail or so ! Please tell me if is the game's fault or Safari ?
Thank you. Arina

You can try to (re)install the current Firefox 17.0.1 release if it isn't working with the current Firefox 18 beta
*Firefox 17.0.x: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
*Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Cached Web Content: "Clear Now"
"Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
*Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]] to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance).
*Do not click the Reset button on the Safe mode start window or otherwise make changes.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Why Garbage Collection take more time on JRockit?

My company use 
BEA WebLogic 8.1.2 
JRockit version 1.4.2 
Window 2003 32bit 
RAM 4 Gig 
 
-Xms = 1300 
-Xmx = 1300 
and running ejb application. 
My problem is why JRockit take more time. How Can I solve this problem. Because my application will down again.
 
This is my infomation on JRockit :
 
Gc Algorithm: JRockit Garbage Collection System currently running strategy: Single generational, parallel mark, parallel sweep.
 
Total Garbage Collection Count: 10340
 
Last GC End: Wed May 10 13:55:37 ICT 2006
 
Last GC Start: Wed May 10 13:55:35 ICT 2006
 
Total Garbage Collection Time: 2:53:13.1
 
GC Handles Compaction: true
 
Concurrent: false
 
Generational: false
 
Incremental: false
 
Parallel: true
 

Hi,
I will suggest you to check a few places where you can see the status
1) SM37 job log (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load) (give request name) and it should give you the details about the request. If its active make sure that the job log is getting updated at frequent intervals.
Also see if there is any 'sysfail' for any datapacket in SM37.
2) SM66 get the job details (server name PID etc from SM37) and see in SM66 if the job is running or not. (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load). See if its accessing/updating some tables or is not doing anything at all.
3) RSMO see what is available in details tab. It may be in update rules.
4) ST22 check if any short dump has occured.(In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load)
5) SM58 and BD87 for pending tRFCs and IDOCS.
Once you identify you can rectify the error.
If all the records are in PSA you can pull it from the PSA to target. Else you may have to pull it again from source infoprovider.
If its running and if you are able to see it active in SM66 you can wait for some time to let it finish. You can also try SM50 / SM51 to see what is happening in the system level like reading/inserting tables etc.
If you feel its active and running you can verify by checking if the number of records has increased in the data tables.
SM21 - System log can also be helpful.
Also RSA7 will show LUWS which means more than one record.
Thanks,
JituK

Why Safari takes much long time than other browser to open a page?

I have used windows since start of my computing life... Now i have replaced my windows laptop to a macbook pro.. Everything is amazing.. except only one. Safari.. I experience it takes too long time for openning a webpage...even for a simple webpage...takes much more time for loading a flash... I dont know why Safari is taking too many times as compared to other web browsers...

I found the same problem too after moving into mac earlier this week....
i guess here's the solution https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5227588
try uninstall/unable the third party extension

Why import of change request in production takes more time than quality?

Hello All,
why import of change request in production takes more time than import into quality?

Hi jahangeer,
I believe it takes same time to import a request in both quality and production as they will be in sync.
Even then if it takes more time in production that may depend on the change request.
Thanks
Pavan

Why view have no stored data ? And what is the reason view take more time

Why view have no stored data ? And what is the reason view take more time to query ?
what happen if a view have stored data?

user12941450 wrote:
I want to know the reason that why querying view is slower then querying a normal table?..Untrue.
For example take a table with 2laks record and a view for that table.
If i make a query like( Select name,address from table) then it works fast then select(name,address)from view..Incorrectly interpreting the results.
A view is a SQL statement. Only difference is that the SQL statement is stored in the database's dictionary. Let's consider the following view:
create or replace view foo_view as select * from empWhen you use the view as follows:
select * from foo_viewOracle sees it as follows:
select * from (select * from emp)This is no slower, or no faster, than providing the following SQL to Oracle:
select * from empSo if you observe a difference in performance between using plain SQL versus using that same SQL via a view, there are other reasons for that difference in performance. The reason is NOT that views are slower.

In one website, it takes to much time to load the page, in other site its not taking time, so do i need to enable or change any settings

in one website, its taking time to load the page, on other PC its not taking any time( with internet explorer) in my PC other websites are opening quickly but this website takes too much time with firefox

Zepo wrote:
My iMac has been overwhelmed almost since I bought it new. After some digging the guiness bar suggested its my Aperture library being on the same
internal Tera byte drive as my operating system.
Having a single internal hard drive overfilled (drives slow as they fill) is very likely contributing to your problems, but IMO "my Aperture library being on the same internal Tera byte drive as my operating system" is very unlikely to be contributing to your problems. In fact the Library should stay on an underfilled (roughly, for speed, I would call ~half full "underfilled") internal drive, not on the Drobo.
Instead build a Referenced-Masters workflow with the Library and OS on an internal drive, Masters on the Drobo, OS 10.6.8 (there have been issues reported with OS 10.7 Lion). Keep Vault backup of the Library on the Drobo, and of course back up all Drobo data off site.
No matter what you do with i/o your C2D Mac is not a strong box for Aperture performance. If you want to really rock Aperture move to one of the better 2011 Sandy Bridge Macs, install 8 GB or more of RAM and build a Referenced-Masters workflow with the Library and OS on an internal solid state drive (SSD).
Personally I would prefer investing in a Thunderbolt RAID rather than in a Drobo but each individual makes his/her own network speed/cost decisions. The Drobo should work OK for referenced Masters even though i/o is limited by the Firewire connection.
Do not forget the need for off site backup. And I suggest that in the process of moving to your new setup it is most important to get the data safely and redundantly copied and generally best to disregard how long it may take.
HTH
-Allen Wicks

Bind variable code takes more time to complete?

Hello, My database is oracle11g.
I have same plsql code and first one is without bind variable and second one is with bind variable. Usually, bind variable should take less time. But here
the bind variable takes more time than the regular code... Can any one please explain why?
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select * from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 SELECT count(*) into v_cnt
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = i.benefit_id)
12 AND effective_date =
13 TO_DATE ('2011-01-23 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH24:MI:SS')
14 AND rate_type_id = 1;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....06
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select benefit_id from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 execute immediate 'SELECT count(*)
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = :x)
12 AND effective_date = trunc(sysdate)-202
13 AND rate_type_id = 1'
14 into v_cnt using i.benefit_id;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....061
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>

Shrinika wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.. Now i understand...
One final question on this thread before i close this thread....
My database is set to CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE for some reason. It seems somebody applied a "quick and dirty fix" to "database is slow" problem. BAD PRACTICE
My question is, when we use bind variable, does it parse the sql code every time? or does it reuse the execution plan?
In my database, it reuse the execution plan... Just checking... When we set CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE, it should generate the execution plan
for every unqiue sql code... Is that correct? Am i confusing?If by "parse" you mean a "hard parse" (which generates execution plan), then the answer is NO. As you observed, it reuses execution plan.
For e.g. with CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE setting, following SQLs
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 10 ;and
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 20 ;would tend to reuse the same execution plan since both of these will be rewritten by oracle (before execution) as
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = :SYS01 ;Hope this helps.
Edited by: user503699 on Aug 14, 2010 3:55 AM

Taking more time for loading Real Cost estimates

Dear Experts,
It is taking more time to load data into cude CO-PC: Product Cost Planning - Released Cost Estimates(0COPC_C09).The update mode is "Full Update"There are only 105607 records.For other areas there are more than this records,but it gets loaded easily.
I have problem only to this 0COPC_C09.Could anybody can guide me?.
Rgds
ACE

suresh.ratnaji wrote:
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
_optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      choose
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
please let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?Suresh,
Any particular reason why you have a non-default value for a hidden parameter, optimizercost_based_transformation ?
On my 10.2.0.1 database, its default value is "linear". What happens when you reset the value of the hidden parameter to default?

Oracle coherence first read/write operation take more time

I'm currently testing with oracle coherence Java and C++ version and from both versions for writing to any local or distributed or near cache first read/write operation take more time compared to next consecutive read/write operation. Is this because of boost operations happening inside actual HashMap or serialization or memory mapped implementation. What are the techniques which we can use to improve the performance with this first read/write operation?
Currently I'm doing a single read/write operation after fetching the NamedCache Instance. Please let me know whether there's any other boosting coherence cache techniques available.

In which case, why bother using Coherence? You're not really gaining anything, are you?
What I'm trying to explain is that you're probably not going to get that "micro-second" level performance on a fully configured Coherence cluster, running across multiple machines, going via proxies for c++ clients. Coherence is designed to be a scalable, fault-tolerant, distributed caching/processing system. It's not really designed for real-time, guaranteed, nano-second/micro-second level processing. There are much better product stacks out there for that type of processing if that is your ultimate goal, IMHO.
As you say, just writing to a small, local Map (or array, List, Set, etc.) in a local JVM is always going to be very fast - literally as fast as the processor running in the machine. But that's not really the focus of a product like Coherence. It isn't trying to "out gun" what you can achieve on one machine doing simple processing; Coherence is designed for scalability rather than outright performance. Of course, the use of local caches (including Coherence's near caching or replicated caching), can get you back some of the performance you've "lost" in a distributed system, but it's all relative.
If you wander over to a few of the CUG presentations and attend a few CUG meetings, one of the first things the support guys will tell you is "benchmark on a proper cluster" and not "on a localised development machine". Why? Because the difference in scalability and performance will be huge. I'm not really trying to deter you from Coherence, but I don't think it's going to meet you requirements when fully configured in a cluster of "1 Micro seconds for 100000 data collection" on a continuous basis.
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Steve
NB. I don't work for Oracle, so maybe they have a different opinion. :)

Automatic DOP take more time to execute query

We upgraded database to oracle 11gR2. While testing Automatic DOP feature with our existing query it takes more time than with parallel.
Note: No constrains or Index created on table to gain performance while loading data (5000records / sec)
Os : Sun Solaris 64bit
CPU = 8
RAM = 7456M
Default parameter settings:
parallel_degree_policy string MANUAL
parallel_degree_limit string CPU
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
arallel_degree_limit string CPU
cpu_count integer 8
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
resource_manager_cpu_allocation integer 8
Query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
from (
SELECT
/*+ FIRST_ROWS(50), PARALLEL */
Query gets executed in 22minutes : execution plan
COUNT(*)
 9600
Elapsed: 00:22:10.71
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3765539975
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 21 | 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | |
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE OR| | 89030 | 1825K| 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SUBSCRIBER_EVENT | 89030 | 1825K| 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)|Automatic DOP Query: parameters set
alter session set PARALLEL_DEGREE_POLICY = limited;
alter session force parallel query ;Query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
from (
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(50), PARALLEL*/
This query takes more than 2hrs to execute
COUNT(*)
 9600
Elapsed: 02:07:48.81
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 127536830
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart|Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 21 | 150K (1)| 00:30:01 | | | | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | | | | |
| 2 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10000 | 1 | 21 | | | | | Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 4 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | | Q1,00 | PCWP | |
| 5 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 89030 | 1825K| 150K (1)| 00:30:01 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)| Q1,00 | PCWC | |
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SUBSCRIBER_EVENT | 89030 | 1825K| 150K (1)| 00:30:01 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)| Q1,00 | PCWP | |
Note
- automatic DOP: Computed Degree of Parallelism is 16 because of degree limitcan some one help us to find out where we did wrong or any pointer will really helpful to resolve an issue.
Edited by: Sachin B on May 11, 2010 4:05 AM

Generated AWR report for ADOP
Foreground Wait Events DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
 Avg
 %Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
direct path read 522,173 0 125,051 239 628.4 99.3
db file sequential read 663 0 156 235 0.8 .1
log file sync 165 0 117 712 0.2 .1
Disk file operations I/O 267 0 63 236 0.3 .1
db file scattered read 251 0 36 145 0.3 .0
control file sequential re 217 0 32 149 0.3 .0
library cache load lock 2 0 10 4797 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S wait on X 3 0 9 3149 0.0 .0
read by other session 5 0 2 429 0.0 .0
kfk: async disk IO 613,170 0 2 0 737.9 .0
sort segment request 1 100 1 1007 0.0 .0
os thread startup 16 0 1 43 0.0 .0
direct path write temp 1 0 1 527 0.0 .0
latch free 51 0 0 2 0.1 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100 0 59 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 19 0 0 2 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 36 0 0 1 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 21 0 0 1 0.0 .0
library cache: mutex X 45 0 0 1 0.1 .0
CSS initialization 2 0 0 6 0.0 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 1 0 0 11 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S 9 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 2 0 0 1 0.0 .0
direct path write 1 0 0 2 0.0 .0
jobq slave wait 17,554 100 8,942 509 21.1
PX Deq: Execute Reply 4,060 95 7,870 1938 4.9
SQL*Net message from clien 96 0 5,756 59962 0.1
PX Deq: Execution Msg 618 56 712 1152 0.7
KSV master wait 11 0 0 2 0.0
PX Deq: Join ACK 16 0 0 1 0.0
PX Deq: Parse Reply 14 0 0 1 0.0
Background Wait Events DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
 Avg
 %Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
control file sequential re 6,249 0 2,375 380 7.5 55.6
control file parallel writ 2,003 0 744 371 2.4 17.4
db file parallel write 1,604 0 503 313 1.9 11.8
log file parallel write 861 0 320 371 1.0 7.5
db file sequential read 363 0 151 415 0.4 3.5
db file scattered read 152 0 64 421 0.2 1.5
Disk file operations I/O 276 0 21 77 0.3 .5
os thread startup 316 0 15 48 0.4 .4
ADR block file read 24 0 11 450 0.0 .3
rdbms ipc reply 17 12 7 403 0.0 .2
Data file init write 6 0 6 1016 0.0 .1
direct path write 21 0 6 287 0.0 .1
log file sync 7 0 6 796 0.0 .1
ADR block file write 10 0 4 414 0.0 .1
enq: JS - queue lock 1 0 3 2535 0.0 .1
ASM file metadata operatio 1,801 0 2 1 2.2 .0
db file parallel read 30 0 1 40 0.0 .0
kfk: async disk IO 955 0 1 1 1.1 .0
db file single write 1 0 0 415 0.0 .0
reliable message 10 0 0 23 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 75 0 0 2 0.1 .0
latch: call allocation 26 0 0 2 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 7 0 0 6 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 352 100 0 0 0.4 .0
undo segment extension 2 100 0 5 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 9 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 42 0 0 0 0.1 .0
latch: parallel query allo 4 0 0 0 0.0 .0
rdbms ipc message 37,948 97 104,599 2756 45.7
DIAG idle wait 16,762 100 16,927 1010 20.2
ASM background timer 1,724 0 8,467 4912 2.1
shared server idle wait 282 100 8,465 30019 0.3
pmon timer 3,123 90 8,465 2711 3.8
wait for unread message on 8,381 100 8,465 1010 10.1
dispatcher timer 141 100 8,463 60019 0.2
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 604 50 8,462 14010 0.7
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 304 0 8,462 27836 0.4
smon timer 35 71 8,382 239496 0.0
Space Manager: slave idle 1,621 99 8,083 4986 2.0
PX Idle Wait 2,392 99 4,739 1981 2.9
class slave wait 46 0 623 13546 0.1
KSV master wait 2 0 0 27 0.0
SQL*Net message from clien 7 0 0 1 0.0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
 % of Waits
 Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
ADR block file read 24 100.0
ADR block file write 10 100.0
ADR file lock 12 100.0
ASM file metadata operatio 1812 99.0 .3 .4 .2 .1
CSS initialization 9 100.0
CSS operation: action 11 90.9 9.1
CSS operation: query 54 100.0
Data file init write 6 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0
Disk file operations I/O 533 88.7 2.6 .6 1.5 .2 6.4
PX Deq: Signal ACK EXT 4 100.0
PX Deq: Signal ACK RSG 2 100.0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 21 42.9 28.6 28.6
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 6 100.0
SQL*Net message to client 102 100.0
SQL*Net more data to clien 4 100.0
asynch descriptor resize 527 100.0
buffer busy waits 4 75.0 25.0
control file parallel writ 2003 9.3 .5 .0 .1 90.0
control file sequential re 6466 10.6 .0 .0 .0 .1 .2 89.0
cursor: pin S 9 100.0
cursor: pin S wait on X 3 33.3 33.3 33.3
db file parallel read 30 6.7 30.0 63.3
db file parallel write 1604 7.4 .1 .6 16.5 75.5
db file scattered read 403 3.7 .2 2.5 13.6 14.9 3.5 61.5
db file sequential read 1017 12.3 .8 2.3 7.3 6.6 2.0 68.8
db file single write 1 100.0
direct path read 522.2 2.2 2.1 .1 .0 1.8 17.9 75.9
direct path write 22 4.5 4.5 90.9
direct path write temp 1 100.0
enq: JS - queue lock 1 100.0
enq: KO - fast object chec 1 100.0
enq: PS - contention 1 100.0
kfk: async disk IO 614.1 100.0 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100.0
latch free 58 46.6 27.6 15.5 10.3
latch: cache buffers chain 19 36.8 10.5 52.6
latch: call allocation 26 76.9 11.5 7.7 3.8
latch: parallel query allo 4 100.0
latch: shared pool 111 44.1 28.8 27.0
library cache load lock 2 100.0
library cache: mutex X 45 84.4 8.9 4.4 2.2
log file parallel write 861 10.0 .1 .1 89.5 .2
log file sync 172 6.4 90.1 3.5
os thread startup 332 100.0
rdbms ipc reply 18 72.2 11.1 16.7
read by other session 5 100.0
reliable message 11 81.8 9.1 9.1
sort segment request 1 100.0
undo segment extension 2 50.0 50.0
ASM background timer 1724 .8 .6 .1 .6 97.9
DIAG idle wait 16.8K 100.0
KSV master wait 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7
PX Deq: Execute Reply 4060 .4 .0 .0 .1 3.4 96.0
PX Deq: Execution Msg 617 34.7 1.5 2.4 1.5 1.5 .2 .8 57.5
PX Deq: Join ACK 16 93.8 6.3
PX Deq: Parse Reply 14 71.4 7.1 14.3 7.1
PX Idle Wait 2384 .0 .6 99.3
SQL*Net message from clien 103 82.5 1.0 1.9 1.0 13.6
Space Manager: slave idle 1621 .2 99.8
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 604 50.0 50.0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)Edited by: Sachin B on May 11, 2010 4:52 AM

It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report

Hi,
It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report. What could cause this? How to troubleshoot the behavior of the report? Could I use Profile and what events should i select?
Thanks

Hi jori5,
Based on my understanding, after changing the parameter, the report render very slow, right?
In Reporting Service, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. To analyze which section take much time, we can check the table Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database. For more information, please
refer to this article:
More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
In your scenario, since you mention the query spends less time, the delay might happens during report processing and report rendering section. So you should check Executionlog3 to check which section costs most of time, then you can refer to this article
to optimize your report:
Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best regards,
Qiuyun Yu

Why safari takes more time in loading a page?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for