Why sender agreement need not to create for IDOC

Hi Experts,
why sender agreement need not to create for idoc

Please check these related discussions:
Re: Question on sender agreement
Re: IDOC and HTTP Adapters - sender agreement ??
Re: ** Sender Agreement is required for RFC but not IDoc, XI, & HTTP.. Why ?
Many threads with the same Q are answered on SDN....so if you search you can find the correct answer that you need!
Regards,
Abhishek.

Similar Messages

Why sender agreement is not necessary when IDOC is a sender?

Why sender agreement is not necessary when IDOC is a sender?

Hi Chiru,
The IDOC Adapter is implemented in ABAP and reside directly on the Integration Server (ABAP Stack).
You cannot define a sender IDOC channel in directory due to the fact that the IDOC adapter does not run in J2EE Adapter Framework but is an "built in" adapter.
I hope this clarifies.
Regards.
Praveen

Why do u need a custom structure for creating a custom bapi

Hi ,
why do u need a custom structure for creating a custom bapi.

Hi,
Once any Bapi realeased the structures it is using freezed to this bapi, the structure becomes specific to this Bapi, we can not make any changes over there. That is why we need custom structure for creating a custom bapi.

SHAREid - A local user session could not be created for the assertion

Problem: We have a client trying to federate to our environment using POST profile but we are getting the following error, "RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion".
I verified that the user exist in the directory and I am able to execute a test successfully as that user.
Thanks.

There is a requirement that the client needs to send an attribute called "traveler" in the assertion. We found out that the problem occurs only when client sends a attribute in the assertion. When the assertion does not include the attribute, there is no issue. Not sure why that is the case as we have other clients sending the same attribute in the assertion.
Here is the AttributeStatement.
<saml:AttributeStatement xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><saml:Subject><saml:NameIdentifier Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified">XXXXXX</saml:NameIdentifier></saml:Subject><saml:Attribute AttributeName="XXXID" AttributeNamespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims"><saml:AttributeValue>XXXXX</saml:AttributeValue></saml:Attribute></saml:AttributeStatement>
It does not have <saml:SubjectConfirmation> and <ConfirmationMethod> element. Can that be a problem?
Thanks,
Vinay
Edited by: user504421 on Jul 9, 2009 2:17 PM

ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level

We recently updated our development environment to Visual Studio 2010. We have previously deployed (with success) .Net stored procedures from Visual Studio 2005 to our Oracle 10gR2 database. I am currently trying to configure a local instance (called local) of Oracle 10gR2 database to test deployment of .Net stored procedures to Oracle 10gR2 via Visual studio 2010 and ODT version 11.2.0.1.2. I have built the demo from the ode developer guide and gotten as far as deploying it but executing the stored procedures from VS 2010 or SQL*Plus produces the following error...
ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CLR", line 152
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.GETDEPTNO", line 7
Here is what I have done.
(Server)
1. Installed oracle 10gR2 with ODE.Net
2. Installed Oracle 10gR2 patch set 22
3. Installed ODE upgrade from Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21
(Client)
4. Installed Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21 (In new client home).
5. Installed patch set 22 on 10g client home.
6. Installed Oracle 11g Release 2 ODAC 11.2.0.1.2 with Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio(in new 11g client home, only for VS 2010)
I have made some minor changes (GAC) etc. per the following threads...
ODE.NET 11.1.0.7.20 on 10g Database?!
Re: Error: System.TypeInitializationException
The database appears to be fully functional via TOAD - SQL plus etc. I can't find much on this error but it appears Oracle needs some permissions to launch an ASP.Net application that it does not have. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated, don't hesitate to ask for additional details.

The KB article is almost what we have apart from theitalic underlined
part
Consider the following scenario:
You use a domain administrator account to log on to a computer that is running Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
You use the Active Directory Users and Computers Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in to connect to a domain controller.
You open the Properties dialog box of a user account.
The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
You set the Remote Desktop Services Home Folderattribute to the shared folder path.
NoteThis attribute is located on the
Remote Desktop Services Profiletab.
You click Apply or OK.
In this scenario, you receive the following error message:
The home folder could not be created because: The network name cannot be found.
Note If you click Apply or OK again, no error message is returned. However, the setting is not saved.
I think the important bit is
The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
We manually create the shares on our NAS and then just want to enter the path in the profile tab, I suppose the question is how to we stop it trying to create the shares ?

Vendor 27672 has not been created for company code 6200

Hai,
I am trying to post a invoice against a Scheduling agreement.
The scheduling agreement has vendor as 27672 and comapny code as 6200 in the header data when i look into ME33L.
When i trying to post an invoice fo the schedulig agreement using BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE , it is thowing the error "Vendor 27672 has not been created for company code 6200". which i am not able to resolve, as the scheduling agreement is raised against that vendor.
when i tried to post the invoice manually using MIRO, there was a POP-UP saying there " PO vendor is not an invoiceing party. enter the invoicing party." where i was giving 27673 which is the alternate payee for this vendor. It is accepting and i could post the invoice succesfully.
However, the same is not available in the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE that i am using.
Is there any way that i can enter the Invoicing party as i did it when i was posting it manually or is there any other way that i can resolve the issue.
Thanks,
Upender

Hi
Go to XD01 and enter the same customer code that you have now and enter the required company code and sales org, dist. chnl and division and enter the required details and save.
Regards
Madhu
Edited by: Madhu Naidu on Sep 19, 2011 6:46 AM

Wrong Sender Agreement:The Sender agreement does not have channel

Hi Guys,
I am trying RFC to File scenarion where I am triggering a report which is calling a RFC module I have given the destinaztion name correct .When I am executing the report it is failing giving the following error
"Wrong Sender Agreement:The Sender agreement does not have channel"
I have checked that sender agreement is there.
Also when Iam changing the RFC call by removing IMPORTING parameters and adding IN BACKGROUND TASK It is getting executed and goin to XI successfullly but after adding IMPORTING Param it is failing ?
Any suggestion on the same?
Regards

Hi Guys ,
I have tested the same again from RFC directly without Report and after some time it failed giving 'SYSTEM ERROR'.
When i checked the channel it is giving following error:
Error: 2008-01-10 13:36:19 IST: Message processed for interface Z_RFC_TESTSYNCASYNC: com.sap.aii.af.mp.module.ModuleException: call to messaging system failed: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Received HTTP response code 500 : Timeout caused by: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Received HTTP response code 500 : Timeout
Any help now ?
Regards

COREid Federation Error: A local user session could not be created for the

Hi,
I installed two instances of COREid Federation in my machine. Also installed SiteMinder and LDAP. Source Domain of COREid (8101) uses LDAP as IdMBridge and Destination Domain (9101) uses SiteMinder as IdMBridge. I am trying to access the resource protected by the SiteMinder from the source domain using the URL which is constructed using the pattern given in the PDF:
http://mymachine.domain.com:8101/shareid/saml/ObSAMLTransferService?DOMAIN=DestinationDomain&method=POST&TARGET=http://mymachine.domain.com:8887/Source/Source.html
Assertions are generated and I can see the assertion in the Source domain and transferred to the Destination Domain.
I get the following error in the Destination Domain Shareid Log file:
ERROR - [http10113-Processor3] - RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion
Please help me to solve this issue?
Note: The Web agent runs on the web server instance 8887.
SiteMinder is able to protect the resource when accessed.

Typically that error occurs when the destinations access management system can't find the user based on the SAML attribute. Check to make sure that the attribute that you are matching on matches exactly.

Trnsaction IW32 : order Could not be created for notification

Hello,
I have created the notification in IW51
In trnsaction IW32 : I am getting error
Entry MT6
order Could not be created for notification 3570075
Following error could occured : Entry MT6
Please help me out
Regards
Rahul

Hello,
IW51
Notification Type :Z2
Notification      : 3570065
Functionlocation : XYZ
work Type         :cd and ef
Main wotk centr   : ca110 /cusm
planner group     : msw /cusm
after I am saving -
notification 3570099 will saved.
Then when I am trying to change -
menu-service notification-change
I am getting one pop-up-it will directly going to workflow systemworkflow Inbox---
order not created for notification 3570099
follwing error occured : MT6
regards

HT201272 Why are audio books not under purchased for download?

Why are audio books not under purchased for download?

cblampson wrote:
I know that. The question is why, when every other media that is sold on iTunes is there.
Becasue the audiobook distributors do not allow Apple do offer this.

Sender Agreement is not Active

Hello,
I am developing a JMS to File and File to JDBC scenarios on XI service pack 9.
All the necessary objects and configuration are created and activated . When i activated them,evertying got activated but i don,t see sender agreement from the SXI_CACHE even its associated communication channel is not visible from the adapter minitor.
I can see all onjects from SXI_CACHE , only sender agreement is missing.
Any suggestions for this problem?
Best Regards,
Chandra

Chandra,
Click on the Sender Agreemt and then Click on the Sender Business Syste, with which you have associated the Sender Agrement. You should then be able to see the same if it active.
Also, if there is no sender agreement for your adapter, then the adapter in Comm Channel Monitoring would give you the error log , "No sender agreement found" . Are you getting this?
Regards
Bhavesh

Change Pointers not being created for HR-PA Custom Infotype

Problem Description:
We have a custom Infotype in SAP to store the data for contingent employee - Infotype 9001. Change pointers is
turned on. We are running the program RBDMIDOC to send changes to Oracle IDM using message HRMD_A. The change
detected for all infotypes except 9001. For 9001, the change pointer is not created.
The following are the current configuration details:
IDOC Extension Created to Idoc type HRMD_A07 (ZHR_EXT)
custom segment zhr_seg
Change pointers are switched on.
Change pointers switched on for message Type HRMD_A.
IDOC configuration created for Port / Process code etc.
Maintenance of view T777D - Added ZHR_SEG.
If I add the segment ZHR_SEG as a 2nd segment to Infotype 0000, I dont get a syntax error. But the changes for Infotype 9001 are not picked up.
If I add the segment ZHR_SEG as a segment to Infotype 9001, I get a syntax error - check EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing) below.
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing)
Message no. E0072
Diagnosis
The segment ZHR9001 has the attribute 'Mandatory' in the syntax description of the basic type HRMD_A07 (customer enhancement ZHR_EXT). However, the segment is missing in the IDoc. The segment number logged in the status record identifies the item before which the segment is missing.
This error may have been triggered by an unidentifiable segment before the expected mandatory segment.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type HRMD_A07 (customer enhancement ZHR_EXT).

Were you able to resolve the issue?
If yes, could you please share what was done to resolve it.
Your help will be greatly appreciated.

Why do we need IDE or tools for java card programming?

Hi,
I am a newbie to java card, using java card kit tools themself, we can test and burn the code into card right?
then why do we need IDE for java card, please correct me , if i am wrong,
Thanks in advance,
Sri.

Dear Sri,
We have compiler, linker etc for every language starting of from C or C++ or Java. JDK has all the tools necessary to develop and run a Java program. Similarly Java Card Development Kit has all the tools for developing and deploying a Java Card applet. But what an IDE does is too integrate all these tools and make it easier for the JavaCard programmer to develop his applets. Just like Eclipse is used for Java applet development.And not everytime the code is burned to the card. Its only during masking code is burned to the card, i.e if u can call it burning. Masking makes an applet permanent on the card.

Why do we need query rewrite enabled for a function-based index?

Oracle 9i
========
I have searched a few sites but could not find any content on it. The question is why do we need to implement query rewrite enabled when we are trying out a function-based index?
Thanks in advance.

You don't, that's a legacy requirement from the early days of function based indexes in Oracle 8i. Here's a quick example running under 9.2.0.6
drop table t1;
create table t1 as
select
from
     all_objects
where
     rownum <= 30000
create or replace function pl_func(i_vc     varchar2)
return varchar2
deterministic
as
begin
     return soundex(i_vc);
end;
-- set the worst case scenario
alter session set query_rewrite_enabled = false;
alter session set query_rewrite_integrity = enforced;
create index t1_i1 on t1(pl_func(object_name));
execute dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't1')
set autotrace traceonly explain
select
     object_name
from t1
where pl_func(object_name) = 'T513'
set autotrace offResults (after set feedback off)
SQL> @temp
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1429545322
| Id | Operation                   | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |       |    27 |   675 |    10   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1    |    27 |   675 |    10   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T1_I1 |    27 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("TEST_USER"."PL_FUNC"("OBJECT_NAME")='T513')
SQL> spool offRegards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Tlanes not being created for all locations for one product

Hello Experts - I need some advice on the following situation:
We have a set of products where tlanes are only being created for 3 locations out of many. What would cause the tlanes to not be generated for all locations if all master data elements are present? We have a valid inforec, mrp views, etc. I can't see anything different with the 3 locations that are working correctly.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks!

Thank you for your resopnse:
To answer your questions, yes, we have done all of these things and the tlanes are still not being created. We have been using SPP for 6 months and this is the first time we've seen this problem. Do you have any other suggestions or is there any more information I can provide you that would be helpful in solving.
Thanks in advance for your advice.
AAF1999

Why sender agreement need not to create for IDOC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for