Why the abumn BDC cann't  transfer the unplanned dep.?

hi,
here is a trouble, i make a bdc from transaction abumn to
transfer a asset value to another asset.
if the asset has no unplanned dep. the bdc works fine;
but if the asset has unplanned dep. although the bdc run successfully,
but the unplanned value can not be transfered to the new asset.
i checked the input parameter of the BDC , it's the same of the abumn when manual inputed.
what is the reason of the problem? the alumn transaction screen doesn't
has an input option about the unplanned dep. can somebody helps me?
i am going crazy...
thanks for your advice.
Message was edited by:
        liu shaochang

For BDC:
http://myweb.dal.ca/hchinni/sap/bdc_home.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/bdc&
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/learning-bdc-programming.htm
http://www.sapdevelopment.co.uk/bdc/bdchome.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/difference-between-batch-input-and-call-transaction-in-bdc.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/69/c250684ba111d189750000e8322d00/frameset.htm
http://www.sapbrain.com/TUTORIALS/TECHNICAL/BDC_tutorial.html

Similar Messages

  • The photos that I better (improves automatic) are saved on the iphone, but when I transfer them to my PC improvements appear no more, only on iphone. I do not understand why the improvements are just the iphone, and not continue when I transfer the photos

    The photos that I better (improves automatic) are saved on the iphone, but when I transfer them to my PC improvements appear no more, only on iphone. I do not understand why the improvements are just the iphone, and not continue when I transfer the photos to my PC.
    Thanks.

    Chicky, I have searched my computer for "iPod Photo Cache" and 51 folders pop up, plus 3 files (iPodInfo.plist, Photo Database and Image DB Temp.tmp). How do I know which to delete and which to keep? The Apple website page tackling this issue doesn't go into any detail. Thanks yet again.

  • Why the Bluetooth file transfer to other smart devices is not supported by apple? I am seeing only the lame excuse "that it only supports apple devices and not other". Knowing that only I'm posting this question to apple support people...

    APPLE never answers this question. I love apple products but this kind of useless restriction drawing itself back to the underground...they only answer what the device can do and they never answer why the device can't do that? I want to directly post this question to apple.

    Apple aren't here. You won't get a response from Apple on this user-to-user help forum.
    Although speculation on Apple policies is not permitted on this forum, it has been previously speculated frequently, that the reasons for not allowing Bluetooth file transfers are:
    1) Bluetooth is too slow for transferring multi-megabyte / gigabyte media files that iOS devices typically store. There are much faster ways of transferring files, not limited by arbitrary distances Bluetooth is.
    2) Allowing file transfers would allow illegal sharing of copyrighted music and video files. Apple has a duty to protect such files from easy sharing due to agreements with the copyright holders for whom they sell this copyrighted content in the iTunes Store.

  • Why the PO action history is not updating when i perform the vacation rules

    Hi,
    Can any one explain why the action history is not updating when performed the vacation rules using the below example
    Example: A >B>C>D are in the approval hierarchy here I have defined the vacation rules by login to the user C here I selected the item type as “All” and delegated to D.
    Now the buyer “A” has sent the document for approval. The user “B” can successfully reserve funds and approved the document. Now the document is automatically delegated to D. Here D can open the document from open notifications and approved the document. Now when I checked the Action history here I cannot find the performed name D who has actually approved the document.
    Note:we are using the 11.5.10.2 version.
    The Action History in the following manner
    Seq Action Performed By
    ================================
    4 Approve C
    3 Forward B
    2 Reserved B
    1 Forward A
    0 Submit A
    From the above action history why the user D name is not showing. Can any one let me know ASAP?
    Regards,
    Keivn.
    Edited by: user10960960 on May 5, 2009 3:36 AM

    When you set up the vacation rule, if you simply delegate the ownership to D, then C retains the ownership and the approval occurs with C's limits. And hence D is treated as the approver.
    If you transfer the ownership, then C is out of the picture. The notification goes to D and when he/she approves, D's limits kick in and he will be seen as approver.
    Hope this helps,
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Why the system create HU that already exists  in table VEKP when I use BAPI_HU_CREATE?

    Hi All,
    When I use the BAPI_HU_CREATE  to create HU, the system give me a HU and it inserts a line in Table VEKP, however when I search in table VEKP  with field HU EXIDV, I find  two entries with the same HU, one of them has VPOBJ 01 and the other has VPOBJ 12, So when I execute  transaction LM46  the system shows “The system could not find transfer order for execution” because the system search in table VEKP it find the first line with VPOBJKEY = delivery  and STATUS = 0020, however those delivery is not assigned to transfer order that I want to confirm transfer order.
    Why the system create HU that already exists  in table VEKP when I use BAPI_HU_CREATE?
    Thank you!
    Best regards

    Do you want to say that you got 2 HU from BAPI_HU_CREATE?
    I think you only got the one which has VPOBJ = 12 Non-Assigned Handling Unit
    which is exact what the BAPI is used for, see the docu in SE37. Didn't you yourself add this EXIDV in the IDoc?
    VPOBJ = 01 Outbound Delivery
    If you want to pack the Outbound delivery then you should use BAPI_HU_PACK.

  • HT4993 When I send Outlook invites to my iPhone (via email) the appointments appear 3 hours earlier? The time setting appears to be EST which is accurate so I can't figure out why the appointments don't appear in real time.  Thanks for your help, Ellen

    When I send Outlook invites to my iPhone (via email) the appointments appear 3 hours earlier? The time setting appears to be EST which is accurate so I can't figure out why the appointments don't appear in real time.  Thanks for your help, Ellen

    1) The best way to relocate the iTunes library folder is to move the entire iTunes folder with all subfolders to the new path, then press and hold down shift as start iTunes and keep holding until prompted to choose a library, then browse to the relocated folder and open the file iTunes Library.itl inside it.
    If you've done something different then provide some more details about what is where and I should be able to help.
    2) Purchases on the device should automatically transfer to a Purchased on <DeviceName> playlist, but it my depend a bit on whether automatic iCloud downloads are enabled. If there is a cloudy link then the transfer might not happen. You can use File > Devices > Transfer Purchases. In iTunes you should also check out iTunes Store > Quick Links > Purchased > Music > Not on this computer.
    3) Backup the device, then immediately restore it. In some cases you need to add a restore as new device into that equation. Obbviously not to be attempted until you're sure all your media is in your library. See Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device should it be needed.
    4) I believe there is complimentary 1 incident 90-day support with hardware purchases, but no free software support for iTunes itself. AppleCare gets you a different level of support.
    tt2

  • Why the purchase from my husband's account charge to my account?

    Why the purchase from my husband's account charged to my credit card?. The register with his own ID and also have provide the payment information.

    You can't currently move or transfer ibooks (or any other iTunes downloads) from one account to another account, so those books will remain tied to his account - but as long as his account is authorised on the computer's iTunes that you sync the iPad to (I only have one account so I can't check) then you should be able to continue to have them in the iBooks app on your iPad

  • Why the server side behavior of LoadVars() not consistent?

    In my server side script for FMS app,there is such code:
    var lv = new LoadVars();
    var params = new LoadVars();
    lv.send("http://mysite.com/registerVideo.php", params, "POST");
    The expected behavior is that the request will be as if sent directly from the browser,thus SESSION information is not lost ,which is the exact behavior for my computer.
    But it's not the case for my boss --- session information is lost for him.
    Why the server side behavior of LoadVars() not consistent?
    What do I need to do to make sure session information is not lost @ server side ?

    Oops,why this feature has always worked like charm for me only??
    Below is the server side request caught from firebug:
    POST registerVideo.php
    http://mysite.net/registerVideo.php
    200 OK
    mysite.net
    115ms
    ParamsHeadersPostPutResponseCacheHTML
    Response Headersview source
    Server
    nginx/0.7.67
    Date
    Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:45:31 GMT
    Content-Type
    text/html
    Transfer-Encoding
    chunked
    Connection
    keep-alive
    Vary
    Accept-Encoding
    X-Powered-By
    PHP/5.2.14
    Expires
    Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
    Cache-Control
    no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
    Pragma
    no-cache
    Content-Encoding
    gzip
    Request Headersview source
    Host
    mysite.net
    User-Agent
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.5.13
    Accept
    text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
    Accept-Language
    en-us,en;q=0.5
    Accept-Encoding
    gzip,deflate
    Accept-Charset
    ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
    Keep-Alive
    300
    Connection
    keep-alive
    Cookie
    pass=angel333; user=liying123; PHPSESSID=8m966mbd070tsdqqodnncesbj5
    Source
    Referer: http://mysite.net/flash/main.swf?sessionId=8m966mbd070tsdqqodnncesbj5 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-length: 35 name=test&record=live&action=insert

  • Why the 2LIS_08TRTK extractor can not get  all data

    Hello, BW Gurus.
    Why the 2LIS_08TRTK and 2LIS_08TRTLP extractors can not get all data. I had used the RSA3 and get 10 registers, when a check at the VTTK table I had 20 registers, I didnt use filters at RSA3, could you help to know what happen o correct it.

    Is it because
    <i>
    Shipment documents and their dependent objects (shipment stages as well as shipment items [deliveries in the shipment]) are only extracted into BW when the Shipment completion status has been set.
    This is necessary because the numeric values that result from the delivery documents are only established at the time. If the data were already stored earlier in BW, the shipment data would not be updated if the delivery notes were changed in BW.
    </i>
    - from oss note 573470.

  • Why the default value is not the Oracle recommended?

    Why the default value is not the Oracle recommended?
    In Oracle 10g, the default alocated unit of Oracle ASM is 1MB. But the Oracle ducumentation states that "To ensure a higher probability of one
    logical I/O resulting in no more than one physical I/O, the minimum stripe depth should be at least twice the Oracle block size". ---See Performance Tuniing Guide (10g10.2 Page8-3.
    It's inconsistent. What is right way?

    >
    Why the default value is not the Oracle recommended?
    In Oracle 10g, the default alocated unit of Oracle ASM is 1MB. But the Oracle ducumentation states that "To ensure a higher probability of one
    logical I/O resulting in no more than one physical I/O, the minimum stripe depth should be at least twice the Oracle block size". ---See Performance Tuniing Guide (10g10.2 Page8-3.
    It's inconsistent. What is right way?
    The default database blocksize of 10g is 8k.
    >
    8 * 128 = 1024
    128 >= 2
    At least twice the size does not mean exactly the doubled size.
    There is no contradiction between the documentation and your observation in this case.
    Kind regards
    Uwe
    http://uhesse.wordpress.com

  • Why the 'LIKE' operator takes so much time to run?

    I have a table T with 3 columns and 3 indexes:
    CREATE TABLE T
    id VARCHAR2(38) NOT NULL,
    fid VARCHAR2(38) NOT NULL,
    val NVARCHAR2(2000) NOT NULL
    ALTER TABLE T ADD (CONSTRAINT pk_t PRIMARY KEY (id,fid));
    CREATE INDEX t_fid ON T(fid);
    CREATE INDEX t_val ON T(val);
    Then I have the following two queries which differ in only one place - the 1st one uses the '=' operator whereas the 2nd uses 'LIKE'. Both queries have the identical execution plan and return one identical row. However, the 1st query takes almost 0 second to execute, and the 2nd one takes more than 12 seconds, on a pretty beefy machine. I had played with the target text, like placing '%' here and/or there, and observed the similar timing every time.
    So I am wondering what I should change to make the 'LIKE' operator run as fast as the '=' operator. I know CONTEXT/CATALOG index is a viable approach, but I am just trying to find out if there is a simpler alternative, such as a better use of the index t_val.
    1) Query with '=' operator
    SELECT id
    FROM T
    WHERE fid = '{999AE6E4-1ED9-459B-9BB0-45C913668C8C}'
    AND val = '3504038055275883124';
    2) Query with 'LIKE' operator
    SELECT id
    FROM T
    WHERE fid = '{999AE6E4-1ED9-459B-9BB0-45C913668C8C}'
    AND val LIKE '3504038055275883124';
    Execution Plan
    0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=99)
    1 0 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'T' (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=99)
    2 1 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'T_VAL' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=4 Card=12)

    I will for sure try to change the order of the PK and see whether there will be any impact to the performance.
    In our application, val is much closer to a unique value than fid. In the example query, the execution plan showed that the index on val was indeed used in the execution of the query. That's why the 1st query took almost no time to return (our table T has more than 6 million rows).
    I was hoping the 'LIKE' operator would utilize the t_val index effectively and provide similar performance to the '=' operator. But apparently that's not the case, or needs some tricks.

  • My IPad cannot download live Tv from skygo. I have no problem with my lap top so I assume the broad band is okay. Can anybody suggest why the live streaming will not work on my iPad one.

    My IPad cannot download live Tv from skygo. I have no problem with my lap top so I assume the broad band is okay. Can anybody suggest why the live streaming will not work on my iPad .

    Are you using the Sky Go app to try and watch it ? If so are you logged in with your Sky account ?
    If you are using the app then you could try closing the app completely and see if it works when you re-open it : from the home screen (i.e. not with Sky Go 'open' on-screen) double-click the home button to bring up the taskbar, then press and hold any of the apps on the taskbar for a couple of seconds or so until they start shaking, then press the '-' in the top left of the Sky Go app to close it, and touch any part of the screen above the taskbar so as to stop the shaking and close the taskbar.
    If that doesn't work then you could try a reset : press and hold both the sleep and home buttons for about 10 to 15 seconds (ignore the red slider), after which the Apple logo should appear - you won't lose any content, it's the iPad equivalent of a reboot.

  • Status keeps changing from invisible to online: why the issue is ignored?

    There is a serious issue raised in the parallel thread, which is critical for many people: "Status keeps changing from invisible to online" (initiated on ‎16-11-2014 by b.agne, Mac section). In short, when starting using a device, the Skype status changing from "invisible" to "online" - sometimes just for a moment, though enough for others to notice you. These affects very much any type of devices. I am sure the issue has already led to multiple personal crisises and potentially financial losses due to buseness partnership issues (I came close to that myself, and now use anything but Skype for business). The question is: WHY the issue is completely ignored by Skype, Microsoft and expert comunity? Please post the solution if anybody knows how to fix the issue, or suggest how to make Microsoft to know that it should be fixed. Kind regard...

    Hi, I also have the same issue. I change the status to Invisible and a later on it is already as "Online", without having even touched/opened Skype. The only way that I see this may happen is that I have the app installed on the smartphone, but before it never had this issue, but from some month ago it started. Any correction or suggestion to work around this issue? Regards

  • HT5312 Hi I'm just wondering does any one know why the email to reset ur password hasn't came to my email address its been 2 days and I have been trying since No Emails ?

    Hi I'm just wondering does any one know why the email to reset ur password hasn't came to my email address its been 2 days and I have been trying since No Emails ? anyone know what happening ?

    Either it ended up in a spam filter or it isn't being sent to that address. If you can't find it, use the link in the 'Additional Information' section of that article to contact the iTunes Store staff.
    (88597)

  • Reasons why the E72 is NOT a 'smartphone'

    Contrary to what Nokia says in its marketing blurb and what the dealer claims, the Nokia E72 (and by inference, others in its ilk) is NOT a 'smartphone' by any stretch of the mind.  Yes, the E72 (and its predecessor the E71 and to a lesser extent the E63) are designs of beauty, good form factor, full QWERTY keyboard, brilliant screen, good camera and wonderful media compatibility features.  But a 'smartphone' is more.  The following are some reasons (having owned - and regretted big time - an E72 for the past 2 weeks:
    1. Top of my complaints list is the fact that the E72 does not have a good desktop suite.  The Nokia PC Suite that it ships with is a poor substitute.  For one, it merely allows the phone's contents to be viewed on a PC screen; it does not allow for the phone's data to be viewed or manipulated offline.  What this means is that the E72 must be connected to the PC for you to be able to see the contents.  What a 'smartphone' needs is the ability for its desktop suite software to be able to be used even when the phone is not connected to the PC (ie offline). This requires a full copy of the phone's data to be stored on the PC and one is able to view, change, edit, etc this data.
    Reasons why one wold want to work offline on the PC are many.  Firstly, it lets you edit the data on the PC (much easier to work on a full PC than on an E72). You can input all your contacts data, etc on the PC then sync to the phone.  Similarly, other data (such as diary events, notes, etc can be authored on a PC and then uploaded on to the E72.  Additionally, one can use the PC Suite software as your main PIM (personal info management) software.  But I suppose Nokia doesn't want people to be able to do that.  What a shame, if that's what the modern day executive needs then he'll just go elsewhere.
    Another reason why the PC Suite software should allow full data manipulation is ... what if your phone is lost, how would you access all your info (contacts, calendar events, memos, notes, etc)?  Even if you have a daily backup, the Nokia user would actually need to acquire another phone (similar model or equivalent) and then do a restore.  Until then, the backup file is of no use (because it cannot be viewed or manipulated).  Such backup strategies (in proprietary flat files) are from the dark ages of computer technology!  Nokia still believes it is cutting edge!
    2. Nokia's PC Suite software is a joke.  Not only does it require that the phone is connected to the PC for it to work, it actually handles data quite differently from the way the phone itself handles the same data!  You can change the fields on the phone but not on the PC Suite, eg you can edit the field on the phone from "Mobile" to "Mobile 1", you can create a new field called "Mobile 2" but on the PC Suite, all you get is the standard "Mobile" and the second mobile field you create is not found! Wow, what synchronisation!
    3. On the phone itself, a true 'smartphone' gives its user a multitude of options to do things his/her own way.  In calendar events mode, I may want to set alarms 15mins before or 30 mins after!  The E72 only allows before, that too only with a set of predetermined figures - ie I cannot set an alarm 23 mins before.
    For some events, I may want to repeat the event and its related alarm on a weekly, monthly or annual basis.  A professor may want to set a weekly alarm (starting from week 1 of the semester to week 14 of the semesster) for his lectures.  Another person may want to set an alarm on a certain day of the month for his loan repayment to the bank.  The Nokia allows you to set an annual anniversary alarm only.  I cannot set an alarm for an event 3 days ahead (say, to give me advance notice to buy a present for a loved one!)
    When editing calendar events, if you change a field but then decide to not keep the new figure, there is no option to cancel. Only the DONE button is present. You have to save (done) then re-edit the field. Silly.
    Similarly the Snooze buttin ought to give the user flexibility to put the alarm off for any set of time.  The phone may remind me of an upcoming event say 4 hours beforehand, I then need to put if off (snooze) for say an hour before it reminds me again.  That's what a 'smartphone' does, remind you politely like an english butler!
    4. The synchronising cable that Nokia ships with the E72 is another joke - its no longer than 6 inches long. Coupled with the requirement that the phone must be hooked up to the PC when doing any work on the PC Suite (see items 1 & 2 above), what if there is an incoming call? How do you answer the call with a 6 inche cable connecting the phone to the PC?  Sure Nokia want's to make savings, but it should be practical.
    The above are the main grouses that I have with the E72.  As any reader can aappreciate, they are all related to the software side of the phone.  At the moment - and with my unit being still new - I have not come across any issues related to the build quality. Yes the design of the battery cover seem flimsy. Its ok so far but I can see its not going to last that way for very long. Yes there is a bit of light leak directly under the Home key but I can live with it. The rear battery cover smudges easily and is a pain to keep clean, but hey, you can't have it all good.
    But as far as the software side is concerned, yes, I do expect it to perform well in handling my data.  We live in a modern world where most of us have an information overload in our daily lives.  That's why we look forward to a 'business smartphone' - a device that is better than a personal assistant and one I can carry in my pocket.  But when we have major global corporations such as Nokia promising you an 'advanced business smartphone' that actually falls three steps short, then I believe the public is being cheated for good.
    I hope other readers would read this post and are better informed about what kind of device they'd be getting should they decide to purchase an E72.  I also realise that Nokia may decide to edit (or even delete entirely) this post, but hey, if that happens, then I'd be promptem to post a copy of this review in a dozen other public forums.
    Have a great day!
    There ought to be laws out there on the use of the term 'smartphone'

    You are correct, well done - it is my view.
    But no, I am disabled and don't work for anyone, but I was a programming consultant.
    If I'm buying or bought anything in the past such as an E71 or E72 then I make sure it can do what I need it to before hand. The E71 surpassed my requirements.
    Mine came with a USB cable over a meter long, however I use bluetooth and need to do nothing - if my PC is on it knows my phone is there and visa versa without me doing anything (smart!).
    The phone can access any of my PC files I require using the phone even when I am out and the PC is switched off. The phone tells me which bus stops to get off at and which way to go when I do. The phone can manage all my calls right down to tailoring for specific numbers and depending on my GPS location do different things. I can automatically order my repeat prescriptions from anywhere and watch live TV or stream my favourite radio stations wherever I am. I can use msn or any messenger, wherever I am - I could go on and on - my phone is definitely 'smart'.
    Ovi is similar to PC suite but much more. You can sync contacts with the ovi server and then access them from any PC. I don't need that functionality so I don't know it very well but I have used it a few times. Ovi is Nokia's mobile web service, go to 'my nokia' to find out, its not difficult.
    I have no need to read your post again, none of what you said justifies the heading you gave this thread.
    If your beloved Palm is so great then go buy another one, why would we be bothered about them in this thread.
    Bottom line is this, you have NOT given any good reasons why the E72 (or any E series phone) 'is NOT a smartphone'. What you believe we think about what is excellent is irrelevant.
    E71-1(241.04) RM-346 300.21.012

Maybe you are looking for