Why there is no manual creation of deliveries for STO...

Individual(VL01N) : You can create one delivery for each sale order on the screen. There is no manual creation of deliveries for STOu2019s. Transaction VL01N
Why there is no manual creation of deliveries for STO...
Thank you very much.
Hoolaa
Edited by: Hoo Laa on Mar 28, 2011 12:28 PM

hi ,
you have to create a sale order process to delivery the tcode VL10B for STO Porcess. not VL01N.
Regards,
A.Sithanandan

Similar Messages

Why there's no multitasking gesture in IOS5 for Ipad 1?

Why there's no multitasking gesture in IOS5 for Ipad 1?
Why?
This's discrimination for iPad 1 users!
Why disable it?
I think your strategy will make many of Apple users dispointed!
I hope to add multitasking gesture to next updata or fix !

iOS 5.1.1 will not give the iPad 1 the full suite of multitouch gestures. The hardware won't support those. And you responded to a post that's almost two years old.
Regards.

Is there a user manual available to download for i photo 11 ?

Is there a user manual available to download for i photo 11 ?

Take a look at this thread.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2652437?start=0&tstart=0

Combined Deliveries for STO

Can anyone tell me the criteria for combining deliveries for STO's.., I believe the delivering plant, receiving plant and delivery data....is there anything else........where do you configure this...
i have two STO's where the delivering plants are different but the receiving plant/shipping point/ delivery date are the same and the deliveries are combining and give me a single delivery...that doesnt seem rite...can anyone help me in this..
Thanks,
Michelle

Hi Sivanand,
Thanks for responding.., but my problem is that i do not want combined deliveries when the delivering plants are different.say I have two or more delivering plants which have the same shipping point and when they transfer to the same recieving plant, the deliveries are combining. I want the deliveries to combine if there are more than 1 delivery from the same delivering plant but a delivery split if deliveries are from different delivering plants.
A -
> B
C -
> B
D -
> B
A -
> B
I want total of 3 deliveries going to plant B
I want the 2 deliveries to combine going from A ---> B
a single delivery from C----> B and another delivery from D -
> B
All the plants belong to the same company code.
Thanks,
Michelle.

Manual creation of idoc for a Accounting document FIDCC1

Hi,
Some of the config for the change pointer was not moved to production and some accounting documents have been created which have not triggered the IDOC.
Is there a way to create the idoc for the accounting documents already created.
Regards,
Puneet.

Once you have all your change pointers setup correctly (view bd52) then you should be good to go BUT to answer your question about the existing documents .. you would need to somehow "touch" those documents to trigger the creation of the IDOCs. You can modify something on then that also is attached to the change pointer say a date? 1/11/11 change to 1/12/11 but don't save that value .. change back to 1/11/11 then save.
Just my thoughts .. let me know how it goes.
Jay Esparza

Quality inspection lot creation during GR for STO

Dear Friends,
I have a Scenario for Quality inspection lot creation during GR with respect to STO
can use inspection type 01
or is there any other inspection type to create inspection lot during GR for STO
Thanks & Regards
Raj

Dear Friends,
when i maintain inspection type 08
Inspection lot is created in GR Plant
Thanks for that
but when i am moving the stock from Plant Sloc A to same plant Sloc B one more inspection lot is cretaed (movment type 311)
if i go to SPRO i can deactivate 311 movement type to avoid creating inspection lot
but it is client level , i need to restrict only for one plant
is there any other way to control just one inspection lot for one GR
if you are not clear with my writing pls do not hesitate to ask for more information
Thanks & Regards
Raj

Delivery Split during creation of delivery for STO

While creating a delivery for STO, delivery is being created for individual line items. On analysis of VL 033 message, I found that the delivery split is happening because of Function SH: Unloading Point.
The message is
<i>"delivery split due to conflicting header data (Function SH: Unloading Point: <-> UP0065)"
Item 000020 cannot be shipped in the same delivery with the other items in the document because the header data (Function SH: Unloading Point) is different. The Function SH: Unloading Point item field has the value UP0065, but in the delivery checked for concatenation it has the value .</i>
This unloading point has been maintained in the customer master data (and needs to be maintained).
I have also been told by my Basis consultant that note 842704 is not valid.
Why is this happening and how to prevent it.
Lakshman

Sorry... but I could not see either the delivering point or the unloading point in the material sales: general / plant view. Those fields are not visible on the screen. I could also not find them in the config (I was checking if they are suppressed).
Regards,
Lakshman

Why can't I manually fill in info for some WAV files?

I've been importing wave files into itunes and filling in the artist info manually, one cd/playlist at time, with the intent of later converting the entire library to apple lossless. I need to do it this way because importing one CD at a time, I select the whole thing, and then fill in the info for the entire selection at once. If I import a bunch of files first I get a huge disorganized mess because there is no "tag" info. The problem is that, for some reason, artist info entered manually for some WAV files "won't take" but if I change to apple lossless first it will. Can anyone suggest a reason for this inconsistant behavior in the iTunes program?
Gerry

WAV files don't have ID3 tags, which hold a lot of the song info.
You might want to have a look at this wikipedia entry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ID3_tag

Is BDC's CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' is not equals to ONLINE(manual) creation?

Hi Experts,
Ours is IS-Oil.
If the user do not enters/inputs OIC_MOT (Mode Of Transport) at ITEM level on the External Details popup, SAP will get it from Customar Master-KNA1 and populates on it, because its a mandatory field (OIC_MOT), but, do not throws an Error message and interupts the sales order creation process.
We have a inbound IDOC posting function module for sales order (VA01), which posts the sales oreders by using BDC (CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01') in the system. In this function module, we are not populating the OIC_MOT field contained segment by hoping SAP will populate/default it while it hits CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' of my BDC of my FM of IB IDOC. But, SAP is not defaulting/populating and throwing error message (saying 'OIC_MOT field is a mandatory input field' data is missing) and IDOC is failing, pls. let me know Wht its so? is the BDC's CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' is not equals to ONLINE (manual ) creation of sales order?
Thank you

Hi
Several transactions can ba a different behavior between online and bdc process, but if you simulate the trx by SM35 you should find out these gaps
I don't know OIL vertical, but the main transactions have a bapi can be used insted of BDC program (BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2, but perhaps there's a particular BAPI for OIL).
Max

Not scheduling on manual creation of planned order

Creating planned order through MD11 and noticed there scheduling not done and capacity planning not done and on doing scheduling manually dates altered and capacity planned which are appearing in CM01 for the respective week
Planned order created through MRP are fine with scheduling an capacity planning .
Please let us know what could be a reason for not updating on manual creation.

Hi
This is standard behavior of SAP as when you create the planned order through MD11 manually , you need to do the detailed scheduling manually by executing schedule in Edit>Schedule.
Check this thread:
Need Automatic Lead-time scheduling in Planned Order using MD11
Regards,
Anupam Sharma

Is there a good website creation app on the iPad, or should I save up and get a MacBook to use RapidWeaver/iWeb?

Is there a good website creation app on the iPad, or should I save up and get a MacBook to use RapidWeaver/iWeb?

Wasn't being condescending, this is a new thead that continues one he already started asking if he could get iWeb on the iPad. Two people explained to him that iWeb was being discontinued (along with MobileMe) and suggested Rapidweaver and two other apps as replacements. It was also explained to him that there were no web creation apps on the iPad because you need to run a local web server, such as Apache, on your computer in order to use them. This is why they work on the Mac because it does have such a server. The iPad does not have one and cannot run one. And I suggested using HTML code if he wanted to develop on his iPad.
You were aware that is how web creation software works?
Here is the other thread:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/15804045#15804045
Do you know a good book on HTML web creation you could recomment to him?
Message was edited by: deggie
Message was edited by: deggie

Why there is spaces between Web App module listings on a web page?

Why there is spaces between Web App module listings on a web page?
Here is the web page:
http://www.mazine.com/test/testpage.htm
And here is the CSS code:
http://www.mazine.com/test/css/tablestyle.css

I only used Photoshop for the layout. Then I created web-safe images for everything that I used for Dreamweaver. I uploaded the images to the internet and then image sourced them into the code so that they will be viewed properly in the correct circumstances. I haven't used HTML since about 2004 and I wasn't very good then. I've just been thrown back into it and I'm pretty much learning as I go. This is my second attempt because I wanted to make the newsletter more eye-catching. My first one is very basic and without a background image at all and that looks fine in pretty much all email clients. I tested it with Litmus. All except for Windows Live Mail, where the images didn't act as links but as static images. It works fine with the others I tested manually. Those being Gmail, Yahoo and AOL. I will try the display:block and get back to you. Thanks for your suggestions.

Why there are differences in error table definitions?

Why there are differences in error table definitions?
We are using OWB repository 10.2.0.3.0 and OWB client 10.2.0.3.33. The Oracle version is 10 G (10.2.0.3.0). OWB is installed on Linux.
I created a error table using DBMS_ERRLOG.CREATE_ERROR_LOG in databse.
Here is the layout.
=========
ORA_ERR_NUMBER$
ORA_ERR_MESG$
ORA_ERR_ROWID$
ORA_ERR_OPTYP$
ORA_ERR_TAG$
PROJECT_ID
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT_TYPE
CREATION_DATE
===========
I imported the table metadata into OWB. As I used the table in mapping using table operator, I am not able to see ERR group in table object of mapping.
How do we bring manually created error table metadata into OWB? Is it feasible?
I specified data rule/shadow table for imported table using object editor. I deployed the table via CC.
Here is the layout from deployed ERROR table from DB
+++++++++++++
ORA_ERR_NUMBER$
ORA_ERR_MESG$
ORA_ERR_ROWID$
ORA_ERR_OPTYP$
ORA_ERR_TAG$
ERR$$$_AUDIT_RUN_ID
ERR$$$_AUDIT_DETAIL_ID
ERR$$$_ERROR_ID
ERR$$$_ERROR_REASON
ERR$$$_SEVERITY
ERR$$$_OPERATOR_NAME
ERR$$$_ERROR_OBJECT_NAME
PROJECT_ID
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT_TYPE
CREATION_DATE
++++++++++++
Why there are differences in error table definitions?
As I used the table in mapping using table operator, I am not able to see ORA_ERR_NUMBER$ , ORA_ERR_MESG$ , ORA_ERR_ROWID$ , ORA_ERR_OPTYP$ , ORA_ERR_TAG$ in ERR group in table object of mapping.
Are there any additional steps/process?
Any idea ?
Thanks in advance.
RI

There are columns for data rule errors (logical errors) and DML errors (physical errors), I think you probably have data rules on the table..?
To process DML errors you will have to add the error table into a map you may have to reverse engineer it). The error group behavior is only available for processing errors from tables with data rules. Ensure your table operator is synchronized with your design table.
http://blogs.oracle.com/warehousebuilder/newsItems/viewFullItem$184
Cheers
David

I bought a new ipad3 packed but after opening its box there are no headsets in it and iphone headsets wont work with iphone so is it normal I mean why there are no heas sets with ipad3 ?

I bought a new ipad3 packed but after opening its box there are no headsets in it and iphone headsets wont work with iphone so is it normal I mean why there are no heas sets with ipad3 ?

Headsets don't come with the iPad. All you get is the iPad, USB cable and wall charger.
Since you're new to iPad ...
You can download a complete iPad User Guide here: http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/ipad_user_guide.pdf
Also, Good Instructions http://www.tcgeeks.com/how-to-use-ipad-2/
Apple - iPad - Guided Tours
http://www.apple.com/ipad/videos/
Watch the videos see all the amazing iPad apps in action. Learn how to use FaceTime, Mail, Safari, Videos, Maps, iBooks, App Store, and more.
How to - Articles & User Guides & Tutorials
http://www.iphone-mac.com/index.php/Index/howto/id/4/type/select
iPad How-Tos http://ipod.about.com/lr/ipad_how-tos/903396/1/
You can download this guide to your iPad.
iPad User Guide for iOS 5
http://itunes.apple.com/us/book/ipad-user-guide-for-ios-5/id470308101?mt=11
 Cheers, Tom

Why there are overloaded create methods in Statful bean?

Hi all,
I have a question ...!
Why there are overloaded create methods for Statefule beans? and why not for Stateless bean?
because any way these create methods are for giving referneces of EJB objects.hence, what is use of overloaded methods in stateful bean?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rahul

Hi Rahul,
Each stateful session bean is tied to a particular client. That means whatever state is passed in during create() is guaranteed
to be available on subsequent invocations. Allowing multiple create methods is a convenience.
For stateless session beans there is no prescribed relationship between the caller and which bean instance is used to handle
an invocation. It wouldn't make sense to allow creation parameters since there would be no guarantee that a subsequent
invocation is handled by an instance containing that particular initialization state.
All of this only applies to the EJB 2.1 and earlier API. Starting in EJB 3.0, there are no longer explicit create() methods.
As you've seen there isn't any benefit to having them in the stateless case. For stateful session beans in EJB 3.0, the
developer can perform initialization by just declaring a particular business method and calling that after first acquiring a
new stateful session bean reference.
--ken

Why there is no manual creation of deliveries for STO...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for