Why we need Acrobat 9.2 Professional?

Hi,
    Thanks for replying my previous post....
    there is one question on my mind...why we need Acrobat 9.2 Professional?
    I mean in the whole process of word to pdf generation what is the function of
    Acrobat 9.2 Professional?
   Thanks nd regards,
   Barun barik

Acrobat includes a plugin to Office that performs the actual conversion.   Generator automates the calling of that plugin

Similar Messages

  • Do I need to follow a procedure for reinstalling acrobat 7.0 professional?

    I need to perform a system recovery on my laptop and I wonder if I am going to have any issues reinstalling acrobat 7.0 professional.

    Or if you can deactivate before the recovery it might do the job. Sometimes a recovery is not needed, but you can reinstall the OS without recovery. To do that you will find instructions on the new, but if you follow the install button rather than recovery you should reach a screen that gives you a choice to reinstall or repair. The repair is more likely what you want. In that case, system files are replaced, but your system retains most other parts of your setup.
    Here is a link with directions for XP (Note the page where it says to NOT use the restore). http://pcsupport.about.com/od/operatingsystems/ss/instxprepair1.htm
    Similar processes are available for Win 7. The steps that MicroSoft provides that suggest to use Restore to repair your machine are misleading. The repair you want is part of the install process (review the screen shots in the line). I have done this several times and it is a life saver for someone like me who has a lot of software that is not part of the original installation included in the system -- in fact most of the software I use regularly.

  • Creating Expandable fields in Abobe Acrobat 9.0 professional

    Hello,
    I am in the process of converting a standard PDF file to a interactive one. The problem I am having is that some of the fields need to be expandable to accommodate needs of the application. I am using Adobe Acrobat 9.0 to convert the standard form into a PDF file to PDF interactive file.
    I have looked in Adobe Acrobat 9.0 Professional but I have not been able to find any documentation on how to expand the fields in the 9.0 Professional version.
      Can you tell me if the LiveCycle Designer has the ability to expand fields and if so how can I set up the document to create the expanded fields. I have reviewed the help documents but it not very clear as to how to go about accomplishing this task.
    I have attache the form that I like to expand.
    I would really appreciate some guidance in this area
    Thank you for your time
    Gary

    Hi,
    Yes, LC has expandaple fields.
    First you have to make your field multiline
    Second - make it expand:
    But you shaould remember tha field will be expanded only after you type smth in it and lost focus.
    BR,
    Paul Butenko

  • Why doesnt Adobe just UPDATE Flash Professional? Arent they reinventing the wheel?

    Congratulations on getting to open beta with Flash Catalyst!
    I know its late in the game to mention something like this but why didnt Abobe just update Flash Professional?
    It seems that the arguments for flash Catalyst center around the following:
    1) smooth workflow between Photoshop & Illustrator, especially because of the same layer view
    2) No coding required to create components out of artwork
    3) Can create FXG  and FXPs to be used in Flash Builder
    4) Can create multi screen aplications
    1) 2) and 3) could all be solved by adding a new types of symbols to Flash Professional's 3 currently available symbols(MovieClip, Button, Graphic)
    1) could be solved by adding a new Sprite symbol.
    Flash Professional needs to be updated to keep up with and match the structure of AS3 anyway.
    Sprites were added in AS3 and now wireframe components are being added to the code structure, why not just at that on the design side as well?
    Sprites are essentially MovieClips with out a timeline.
    So if you created a new Sprite symbol and opened it up in the timeline, you would only see one frame with folders and layers.
    A Sprite symbol is essentially organized the in layers and folders and would just like a photoshop file.
    And if you really want it to look like a Photoshop layout, then you just move the timeline view over to the right.
    This would solve problem 1.  Designers could import their artwork into Flash Professional as a Sprite and it would be a seemless experience.
    Obviously I'm not saying that a bitmap is a sprite. But I am saying that layers of bitmaps and could be organized inside of a Sprite. And the designer could turn any of the assets into a Button, MovieClip, Graphic, Sprite, and hopefully other Classes and WireframeComponents available in Flash.
    2)&3) could be solved by adding a new Symbols for the new Wireframe Components. The Button symbol already has a template with 4 states. Why not update Flash Professional to visually represent more Classes and Component Classes, instead of just the MovieClip Class and the Button Class. Even better, maybe there could be a way to make a template for creating our own wireframe components. Just assign a base class for the wireframe class and a base template, and the introspection view will display accordingly.
    States of the component would be listed out at the top instead of frames,  just like the Button Symbol used to be.  Different layers could be designated for specific graphical parts of the component. The designer would be free to add their own layers if necessary.
    In previous versions of Flash, everything was a movieclip and everthing had a timeline. Thats not the case anymore. The timeline is for intropecting MovieClips, but this view could be different when intropsecting different types of symbols such as Sprites, Buttons, Wireframe Components, and even Custom Wireframe Components(extensible).
    These new Symbols and also Sprites could export to FXG very easily.
    The multi screen applications in 4) look pretty similar to the Slide Presentation Template. Why not just make a new MultiScreen App Template and youre done. these MultiScreenApp Templates could exporte Screens to FXG or export the whole Template to a FXP.
    I applaud the work done on the new wireframe components and FXG. Great Job!
    But, just cant understand why you cant update Flash Professional with new types of Symbols(Sprites, new Buttons and wireframe Component Classes) and a new MultiScreen App Template.
    Flash Professional needs to keep up with AS3 and also needs to export FXG and FXP.
    Why doesnt Adobe focus on on this rather than create a new Tool? These features need to be added to Flash Professional anyway.
    Isnt there more of a disadvantage to having 2  tools for designers that do the same thing?
    I'm sure this issue has been debated before. Can anyone point to me links that have the arguments for creating a separate tool instead of updating?
    Has anyone ever suggested that Flash Professional should keep up with AS3?
    Has anyone ever suggested making Sprites a new symbol in Flash Professional so that it could be more seamless with Photoshop?
    Has anyone ever suggested make Wireframe components in Flash Professional like the Button Symbol in Flash Professional?
    Has anyone ever suggested updating Flash Professional so that it would export FXG and FXP?
    What is your opinion on this?
    -thomasglyn

    @Ross
    Thanks for your explanation. I appreciate your feedback.
    I'm glad we agree that ideally there should be 2 main tools, one for designers(Flash Professional) and one for programming(Flash Builder).
    You had mentioned "But, that assumes this is possible.  As it currently stands it is not" and the reason being "Catalyst, and Builder both use a completely different framework from Professional. The component architecture is drastically different, not to mention the entire backend of the software.".
    You could also argue that, the reasons to make a separate flex component creation tool like Flash Catalyst assumes that updating Flash Professional CS4 is NOT possible. But is the statement about the framework being entirely different really true?
    Well, that depends on what you mean by the term "framework".
    Framework can refer to 3 things in this case.
    1) the component framework
    2) the code framework(AS3)
    3) the flex framework (mxml, fxg)
    If you are refering to #1 then you're right, because Adobe hasnt updated the flash component framework in Flash Professional from Flex3 Halo components to Flex4 Spark components.
    Flash components have gone through many iterations, and the switch from AS2 to AS3 was probably more profound than the new wireless component structure(Spark). And now that we have AS3, isnt the only difficulty creating a intuitive UI in Flash Professional, and adding export features?
    If you are refering to #2 then I think you're incorrect, because Flash Professional has been updated to AS3 and Flex4 Spark components use AS3. I would totally agree with you, if CS4 did not go through all of the trouble updating to AS3.
    If you are refering to #3 then you're right, because Flash Professional doesnt export mxml, fxg, or fxp, but with a little creativity, it would probably be possible to allow such an export. Adding FXG/FXP export features could be solved by creating a new type of project file.  Adobe did this for AS2, AS3, flash lite, etc. Why cant they just make a new AS3/FXG file that only allows you to build fxg/fxp exportable assets.
    Why cant Adobe make a Sprite class the default document class for AS3/FXG projects and when some adds a movie clip asset, export movie clips as swfs or swcs?
    So to be honest, after opening up Flash Catalyst again and looking at it again, I almost get the feeling that its just a Flash Component creation tool with a Photoshop UI, for the new AS3/Flex 4 components(Spark components) that Adobe just refuses to add to CS4.  CS4 uses AS3 and Spark components use AS3.  CS4 needs to be a visual design tool for all the classes in AS3(as much as possible).
    Perhaps Adobe originally meant to name this product...
    ADOBE FLASH COMPONENTS
    Or maybe Adobe Flex Components(but thats no longer true, because Flex 4 will be Flash Builder).
    In regard to "reinventing the wheel". Flash components have been reinvented several times, and I totally agree with you that this is important to "reinvent" components to keep up with new techiques as2,as3,fxg.  You are right, this is a positive thing. However in this case, I am using "reinvent in a negative sense.
    So maybe I shouldnt say "reinvent the wheel", but "reinvent the car".
    Perhaps Adobe is trying to create a wheel for the upperclass RIA programmer Flex car, and isnt making it compatible common designer/programmer Flash car. And when they finished the wheel, and they decided just to make a Segway for the Designers and Flash people to ride, that uses this new wheel.
    You might argue that its more approachable for designers, and designers feel at home because the ui is similar. This is precisely why Adobe should hurry up and finish updating the ui of the Flash Professional IDE so that its ui is more compatable with Photoshop and Illustrator. The fact that Photoshop and Illustrator is the standard for designers are perhaps one of Adobe's greatest advantages.  They could make the designers happy if they just make a Sprite inspector view with layers like photoshop in Flash Professional, instead of using the old "everything
    is a movieclip" paridgim. Flash Professional has already upgraded to AS3 and in AS3 everything isnt a movieclip.  So it would be nice if they could make views for some of the new classes and wireframe components.
    This is the age old debate, update or start from scratch.  I guess I'm saying that I think the hard work of updating to AS3 has already been done, and its just plain wierd that Adobe decides to build a separte tool for components, when they use the same AS3 code base.
    Its just insanely exciting to just think about what could have been if Flash updated and brought on more Designers and at the same time linked in the Flex community. Thats what Flash has always been about! The meeting point between Designers and Programmers.
    To go this far and quit just because of components just leaves me blue.
    It seems that many projects stop at 80% complete and if the developers just spent the extra 20% on fine tuning things then they would have a very high quality product. In this case the remaining 20% is  components, ui, and export. I understand that there are probably many things I dont understand, especially when you through in marketing, and product life cycle.
    But I think Adobe could have done it, if they put as much effort into it as they did to make an entirely new product.
    Maybe we should make some noise before its too late.
    I'm still interested in seeing more links that show the logic behind the initial discussions of this debate when it was first decided.
    pls keep me posted.
    @nwfa & macsavers
    Yes, youre right. it does seem to be their plan.  I just hope they are just testing the waters.  Perhaps after they do the initial selling of Flash Compenents, then maybe they could offer a free update to CS4.
    As I mentioned above, the main reason designers feel at home is because of the UI of Flash Catalyst. UI's can be updated, and I believe Flash Professional can and should update itsui for the reasons I mentioned above.

  • How to Get Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional on multiple PCs

    What is needed to have Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional used by multiple (15) people on their PCs that currently have Adobe Reader 8.0? We have one version of Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional on a stand-alone PC.
    Thanks!

    You might be able to purchase copies of this long-discontinued
    software from a special broker.
    Aandi Inston

  • I have Acrobat 7.0 Professional loaded on Windows 7; No Printer & error msgs

    I have Adobe Acrobate 7.0 Professional, loaded onto a new Dell Inspiron N5010 clone where I have Windows 7. I installed the Acrobat successfully, but the virtual printer does not show up as an available printer in my Devices & Printers.  Also when I click on the desktop icon for Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional, I get these error messages:   There was an error while loading the plug-in 'Accessibility.api'. The plug-in failed to initialize.  Then when I click on the OK button, I get another pop-up window saying:  There was an error while loading the plug-in 'AcroForm.api'.  The plug-in failed to initialize.  Then when I click on the OK button, I get a final pop-up window saying: There was an error while loading the plug-in Annots.api. The plug-in failed to initialize.  Anybody ever get this set of issues???, and if so....Help!  I would be ever so grateful.  I am worried that Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional is incompatible with Windows 7.  I know that if so, it might mean I need to buy 9.0.  Can I just upgrade?  Is that less costly?  Many thanks to anyone who can offer some advice.  ---DMN

    Further to this original post ---  OK, I uninstalled and then reinstalled the program, to no avail.  I did however get a message which I had gotten before but since I was not yet aware that the program got installed with any problems, I had not noticed... This time I took notice.  The error message was clearly what it is about, at least to a great extent.  I got this message:  Warning 20225: Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Setup was unable to create a new item:  Adobe PDF Port Printer may be unavailable.  GetLastError:  The operation completed successfully.  So then after the reinstallation, I went into Control Panel, Printers & Drivers and made a valiant attempt to manually install a virtual printer port.  I have Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional installed in another computer on which I have Windows XP Pro (yes the only other computer--  I am permitted two installations for this program--  I confirmed this with Adobe), by looking at Properties and copying down exactly the text, etc. which described the names of the two possible ports, etc.  Tried to "tell" my new computer (the one which has Windows 7) that it should set up and/or look for such a virtual port, again to no avail.  I am amazed that Adobe does not allow me to even pay cash money for tech support, but they wouldn't do it.  I guess you can have just so many employees who know the programs, etc.  Anyway, as I said before I may just break down and buy the 9.0 version which the Adobe techie told me is indeed compatable with Windows 7.  He did not tell me that Windows 7 was incompatible with Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional but that 8.0 is indeed incompatible.  Just googled the term "Warning 20225" along with some relevant buzz words.  I can see there is still a bit of tweaking I may be able to do before I cry "uncle!"

  • Embedding video in PDF, keeps says it cant convert and need Acrobat Pro Extended?

    I have Acrobat Pro 9 and with using the tool to embed video which seems to convert to a flash format, it keeps coming back saying its unable to convert and that I would need Acrobat Pro Extended.  I tried a handfull of different video types and every one that I chose gave me the same message.  All it will seem to do is somehow link to the video whcih will use the viewer installed on that persons computer to run.  It seems to give you the ability to convert video over but it doesnt let you for anything you choose, what am I doing wrong?
    I have Acrobat Pro 9 Extended at work which I tried the same thing with and of course, that worked.  Is the Extended part by any chance just a patch for Pro 9 or is it a totally different purchase?

    "Add multimedia to PDFs" at Acrobat Pro's LiveDocs may help to clarify.
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Acrobat/9.0/Professional/WS65B80E79-F165-44f0-BBCA-0F142A75869 6.html
    Looks like the following general observations apply.
    If the multmedia file(s) meet the identified requirements for Professional it is "in".
    If the multimedia file(s) do not, then conversion is required - but conversion is only available in Pro Extended.
    That you get a "need conversion" message, from Pro that would be indicative of an input that does not meet the specified requirements for direct use in Pro.
    An alternative might be to try "Create Legacy ..."
    Legacy multimedia will rely on the end-user having the appropriate player application installed.
    fwiw - having an interest in multimedia & PDF you might find this helpful
    Video and Audio file formats supported in Acrobat 9 and Adobe Reader 9
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405848.html
    Be well...

  • Acrobat 7.0 professional pdf binders issue

    I have adobe acrobat 7.0 professional and this feature
    stopped working:: to make a pdf of multiple files, like word docs.
    it does compined many esisting PDFs into one binder, not like it
    used to do to combine several mixed docments to a PDF binder. I had
    my company IT dept reinstall, and I still get errors, to run in
    repair mode, then still does not work.
    OS: Windows XP;
    Browser: IE
    Already Tried:
    IT look at and reinstall,

    I just answered this question in http://forums.adobe.com/message/4251547#4251547. Basically you should be able to create a PDF (assuming you are not using a 64-bit system and then I have no clue), but not in the automated way you are used to doing. The first step would be to change the printer port for the Adobe PDF printer (assuming the driver got installed) to file. Then when you print or use PDF Maker, it will ask you for the file name. It will create a PS file (may have a prn extension) that you have to open in Distiller to complete the rest of the conversion. A bit of extra work, but workable. You are looking at a Win7 issue that has caused major problems for many software vendors, not just Adobe. The newer versions of Windows seem to ignore a lot of compatibility needs. Don't forget that with VISTA they had to add the help system back in because their own MS Office needed it.

  • Hi I've just upgraded from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion now Quarkxpress 6.5, Adobe creative suite CS2, Adobe Acrobat 7.0 professional and Microsoft Office 2004 will nolonger open. Can anyone please advise me what I can do to get these programs running.

    Hi I've just upgraded my MacBook Pro from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion. Now my installed programs:- Quarkxpress 6.5 - Adobe creative suite CS2 - Adobe Acrobat 7.0 professional and Microsoft Office 2004 will not open - I get a banner saying not supported by power mac. Can anyone please help me I really need these programs for my work. Thank you!

    hi tuggerose
    i think it is bad new for you. if it's any consilation i went through the same thing when i loaded mountain lion when it first came out. i think the problem is that mountain lion is a pure 64bit operating system and the software you have is 32bit. earlier os's were able to emulate 32bit but the new system does not. the answer is new software. i did it and it cost me a load of money and much angst so your not alone.

  • I purchased a replacement PC and have not been able to install/activate my Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional.  Any suggestions.

    I purchased a replacement PC and have not been able to install/activate my Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional.  Any suggestions?

    You need to install a special version using a special serial number... see the following:
    Error: Activation Server Unavailable | CS2, Acrobat 7, Audition 3 -
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/creative-suite-2-activation-end-life.htm l

  • I can not re install Adobe Acrobat 7.0 professional on my computer.  It is saying a qualifying product is not detected. I cant even get through using the customer service line they provide 800-272-3623.  This is the worst interactionI have ever had with a

    i can not re install Adobe Acrobat 7.0 professional on my computer.  It is saying a qualifying product is not detected. I cant even get through using the customer service line they provide 800-272-3623.  This is the worst interactionI have ever had with a company.

    Hi joej49728017,
    I am so sorry for the inconvenience caused. However this is just because Adobe Acrobat 7.0 is an outdated version & the now the activation server for it does not exist.
    Please refer to the following KB doc.  Error: "Activation Server Unavailable" | CS2, Acrobat 7, Audition 3
    The above link will help you to  install a special version that does not require activation.
    In case you further need any help, please let us know. We will be more than happy to help you.
    Regards,
    Aadesh

  • I bought Adobe Acrobat 7.0 professional a few years before, Will it still work?

    I bought Adobe Acrobat 7.0 professional a few years before, Will it still work? I have the serial number and CD.
    Or do I have to pay monthly subscription to convert pdf to word, to use pdf reader etc?

    You may or may not be able to install Acrobat 7.0 on a modern operating system.
    Also, you can no longer activate Acrobat 7.0 with your original serial number; you need to download the installer and get a special serial number from this website https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/creative-suite-2-activation-end-life.ht ml

  • I adobe acrobat 7.0 professional. When I open or save a PDF it reverts to Adobe Reader XI. How can I change that to the pro as it has far more editing options.

    I adobe acrobat 7.0 professional. When I open or save a PDF it reverts to Adobe Reader XI. How can I change that to the pro as it has far more editing options.

    You may want to keep Reader. You may want to select Acrobat as your default, but be able to click on a PDF (or PDF link) to open in Reader when needed. There are likely some PDFs that will not open correctly in AA 7 because of new features folks add. Just because it opens in Reader XI does not mean it is in the new format, but just that is the default opening you have. To tell the type of file, you have to open the PDF and check the properties (ctrl-D) and check Description>PDF version.

  • Adobe PDF Port_Printer didn't install with re-installation of Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional.

    A new Windows 7 OS was installed on my computer and I've had to re-load Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional.  Everything loaded except for Adobe PDF Printer.  Error message: Warning 20225. Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Setup was unable to create a new item: Adobe PDF Port-Printer. The Adobe PDF Printer may be unavailable.      I'm using the original CD to set up Adobe.  Any idea on why I'm getting this message?

    The first version of Acrobat to support Windows 7 is version 9.2 - so this is why you are encountering issues. To troubleshooting the problem, you might find this article helpful Error "Warning 20225" or no PDF Printer appears.

  • Adobe acrobat 7.0 professional installed on windows 8

    With the assistance of Adobe Chat I have downloaded adobe acrobat 7.0 professional to my desktop which has windows 8. Everything works beautifully except when I go on to internet explorer and try to view a pdf document. It says "This page can't be displayed". I'm sure it is just a setting somewhere, can anyone help me? Thank you, Don.

    Yes, I successfully installed Acrobat 7.0 professional on Windows 8. I’m now able to create pdf files on my Microsoft Office Suit (Word & Excel) and anytime I need to add/extract pages, etc. in these pdf files I’m able to use 7.0. My only problem was opening pdf’s on my internet explorer. I downloaded the latest version of Adobe reader and now everything works great (for my needs). I now have the choice of opening my pdf files (In “Documents”) in either 7.0 or reader, depending if I want to just read the document or work with it. I have no need to create pdf files with Adobe Acrobat 7.0 because saving documents in pdf format is a built-in feature of my Microsoft Office suit software (which is great)

Maybe you are looking for