WICTMS not picking up wip_move_txn_interface records

I am populating the wip_move_txn_interface table with a move record. The WIP Move Transaction Manager (WICTMS) is running every 5 minutes. But my record in the table is not getting processed. 3 days ago it was working, and the WICTMS pgm was recognizing the record and spawning the WIP Move Transaction Worker (WICTWS) program. But today I am inserting a similar record with a move to next operation, and WICTMS is not picking up the record. I can perform the move using the Oracle Apps move transaction form.
Any ideas on what I am missing and why it worked 3 days ago but now is not working. Below is my insert statement.
insert into WIP_MOVE_TXN_INTERFACE
(created_by_name
,creation_date
,fm_intraoperation_step_type
,fm_operation_seq_num
,last_update_date
,last_updated_by_name
,organization_id
,process_phase
,process_status
,to_intraoperation_step_type
,to_operation_seq_num
,transaction_date
,transaction_quantity
,transaction_uom
,wip_entity_name
values
('name'   --created_by_name
,sysdate     --creation_date
,'1'         --fm_intraoperation_step_type
,30          --fm_operation_seq_num
,sysdate     --last_update_date
,'name'   --last_updated_by_name
,123         --organization_id
,1           --process_phase
,1           --process_status
,1           --to_intraoperation_step_type
,40          --to_operation_seq_num
,sysdate     --transaction_date
,1           --transaction_quantity
,'EA'        --transaction_uom
,'123456' --wip_entity_name

Hi,
Was it solved? .. I'm Facing a similar issue where the program runs fine and completes without any errors but it doesn't processes the record in the interface.
Regards
Ari

Similar Messages

Net price not picking from info record

I am creating a new PO, but net price is not picking from info record. Info record is getting copied in the line item for PO, but net price is not copied. Due to that I am unable to create PO. If I manually enter price PO can be created. Could someone tell me what might be the reason Price is not automatically taken from Info Record. Please guide me what all I need to check.
The same data is working in one cleint, and in another client this data is facing problem.
Thanks
Vineeth

Hi
1) If there is condition record exit in system,then while creating po system will take condition record
2) If In inforecord last po number is exist for material and vendor ,then system will take this into consideration
3) if your creating po first time for material and vendor ,and we have maintain purchasing inforecord for purchasing organization and for plant,then system will take it into consideration
40 If none is available we have to put condition manually in po
Regards
Kailas ugale

Pricing Condition not picking from Info record

Dear Sapians
We have made all the Changes for Higher Education Cess. Now while creating PO some conditions are not picking from info record(only for some materials). In Dev. server Everything working fine.
What could be the problem?
Warm Regards
Sukumaran.E

Hi Sukumaran,
You need to go to PO -> item conditions -> press analysis button.
double click on the pricing condition on left hand side screen. You will get proper analysis. Like "PBXX 111 Condition ignored (requirement 005 not fulfilled)"
These descriptions will give clear hint on the reason of price not being picked up.
- Sanjeev

PO having Item Category u0091Pu0092 or u0091Qu0092 price not picking from Condition Record

Hi Guru,
Purchase order having Item Category P or Q Price should pick from the condition type.
Where my condition type against on material and WBS based on this Price will be fixed.
Now I create the PO for same, which the price was not picking from the Condition Record.
Please help on this.
Thanks
Muthukumar

The condition record was created and is being picked up in the calculation. Also, I am now testing with a material that does not have a PIR created, so the PIR does have an impact on my current results.
My current test has results as follows: condition P101 = Std. Cost (as expect) $100.00; ZUPP = calculated at 5% (as expected) $105.00. However, the Net Price in the PO line item is showing only $100.00, not the $105.00.
A look at table EKPO shows the following: Net Price (NETPR) $100.00; Net Value (NETWR) $100.00 ; Gross Value (BRTWR) $105.00.
Can you tell me what I am missing with this setup?

Receiving Open Interface not picking Inter-Org records from Interface

Hi,
I am trying to receive the inter org transfer through the Receiving Open interface, but the interface not picking the data from the interface tables (RCV_HEADERS_INTERFACE, RCV_TRANSACTION_INTERFACE).
I am in 11.5.10.2, all the sources worked fine like Vendor, Internal Order, Customer but the issue is with the Inventory source (inter orgs)
Please could you advise what could be the reason for the interface for not picking the Inventory source data from the interface table.
Below are the interface insert script that am using..
INSERT INTO RCV_HEADERS_INTERFACE
(HEADER_INTERFACE_ID,
GROUP_ID,
PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE,
RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE,
TRANSACTION_TYPE,
AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
SHIPMENT_NUM,
RECEIPT_HEADER_ID,
SHIP_TO_ORGANIZATION_ID,
EXPECTED_RECEIPT_DATE,
EMPLOYEE_ID,
VALIDATION_FLAG
VALUES
(rcv_headers_interface_s.nextval , --Header_Interface_Id
rcv_interface_groups_s.nextval, --Group_Id
'PENDING', --Processing_Status_Code
'INVENTORY', --Receipt_Source_Code
'RECEIVE', --Transaction_Type
'DELIVER', --Auto_Transact_Code
SYSDATE, --Last_Update_Date
-1, --Last_Updated_By
-1, --Last_Update_Login
SYSDATE, --Creation_Date
-1, --Created_By
'ICR-001', --SHIPMENT_NUM
21073573, --RECEIPT_HEADER_ID
2266, -- SHIP_TO_ORGANIZATION_ID
SYSDATE+1, --Expected_Receipt_Date
5543, --Employee_Id,
'Y' --Validation_Flag
INSERT INTO RCV_TRANSACTIONS_INTERFACE
(INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID,
GROUP_ID,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,
TRANSACTION_TYPE,
TRANSACTION_DATE,
PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE,
PROCESSING_MODE_CODE,
TRANSACTION_STATUS_CODE,
CATEGORY_ID,
QUANTITY,
UNIT_OF_MEASURE,
ITEM_ID,
AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE,
SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID,
SHIPMENT_LINE_ID,
SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID,
RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE,
TO_ORGANIZATION_ID,
DESTINATION_TYPE_CODE,
DELIVER_TO_PERSON_ID,
LOCATION_ID,
DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID,
SUBINVENTORY,
LOCATOR_ID,
HEADER_INTERFACE_ID,
VALIDATION_FLAG,
SHIPPED_DATE
--SELECT
VALUES
rcv_transactions_interface_s.nextval, --Interface_Transaction_id
rcv_interface_groups_s.currval, --Group_id
SYSDATE, --Last_update_date
-1, --Last_updated_by
SYSDATE, --Creation_date
-1, --Created_by
-1, --Last_update_login
'RECEIVE', --TRANSACTION_TYPE_RECEIVE
SYSDATE, --TRANSACTION_DATE
'PENDING', --PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE
'BATCH', --PROCESSING_MODE_CODE
'PENDING', --TRANSACTION_STATUS_CODE
203, -- CATEGORY_ID
20, --QUANTITY
'EACH', --UNIT_OF_MEASURE
4379131, --ITEM_ID
'DELIVER', --AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE
21073573, --SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
16566939, --SHIPMENT_LINE_ID
101629781, --SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID
'INVENTORY', --RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE
2266, --TO_ORGANIZATION_ID
'INVENTORY', --DESTINATION_TYPE_CODE
13706, --DELIVER_TO_PERSON_ID
101629781, --LOCATION_ID
101629781, --DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID
'FG', --SUBINVENTORY
46259, --LOCATOR_ID
rcv_headers_interface_s.currval, --Header_interface_id
'Y', --VALIDATION_FLAG
SYSDATE
Thank you,
Genoo
Edited by: Geno on May 25, 2013 4:54 AM

Any suggestion/advise please!
Thanks,
Genoo

Data loads is not picking up all records

Hello, wonder if anyone ever encountered the following problem. I've been trying to load a flat file to BPC and for a year now, we've had no issues. This time however, it seems that not all records were loaded, eventhough the status indicated the correct number of rows were successfully loaded. Any ideas what may be causing this? I've checked the conversion files, account dimension and nothing has changed. Any help with this is greatly appreciated. Ideas on how / where to check for potential trouble spots are all welcome.
Thanks in advance.
David

Hello,
If you are using the standard SSIS package import, the rejected record should be reported into the log file at the end. However, in order to see if there are rejected records or not, you can try to validate your transformation file using the same import file.
You can also verify also the temporary files generated into D:\BPC\Data\Webfolders\APSHELL_Sorin\Finance\PrivatePublications. In this way you can find the right calues imported into the cube.
How you check if data is loaded or not?
Best regards,
Mihaela

Problem with views -- not picking up new records from table?

Hello,
I'm having trouble with some of my views and I can't understand what is wrong. I have a table that contains three months of data. The view references the table, but only picks up the prior two months of data. When I query the table the latest month's data is definitely in there, and I've checked and rechecked the view and it looks OK (besides, it worked in the past when I loaded the 2nd month's data without and changes). Can anyone suggest anything to look for in terms of why this latest month of data doesn't show up in the view? What is even stranger is that I have some other tables that contain 3 months of data and those views work fine and are identical except that the table and view names are different (obviously). Thanks for your help.

here's something else that i don't understand -- let me show you something:
as you can see below, the 08-MAY-2007 data loaded...:
UPLOAD_DA CLOSING_D
08-MAY-07 30-MAR-06
08-MAY-07 31-JAN-06
08-MAY-07 30-JUN-06
08-MAY-07 31-JUL-06
08-MAY-07 29-SEP-06
08-MAY-07 31-OCT-06
08-MAY-07 15-DEC-06
08-MAY-07 29-DEC-06
however, when I run this:
SQL> select distinct upload_date from cmo where closing_date >= '01-JAN-2006' and closing_date <= '31-DEC-2006';
UPLOAD_DA
05-APR-07
05-MAR-07
Why doesn't this pick up those rows above? it seems obvious to me that there are records with upload dates on 08-may-2007 BUT when I run it as above (which is how I run it in the view) they don't appear. What am I missing????

Garageband is not picking sound from builtin mic (rMBP). I recorded some tracks, now it is not working. All other apps can use the mic. Monitoring is switched ON at GB, it picks sound only some other app, eg. Skype, is used to access the mic.

Garageband is not picking sound from builtin mic (rMBP).
I recorded some tracks, now it is not working. I have checked GB Preferences, Audio/MIDI > Audio Input > Built In Microphone.
All other apps can use the mic. Dictation, Skype etc. can use the mic!
Monitoring is switched ON at GB, it picks sound only some other app, eg. Skype, is used to access the mic.
Can any one help me, Please!
Many thanks!

I have foud the solution - rather stupid. The system setting for audio input was at 70%, increasing it to 100% solves the problem!

PO not picking up the Price from Info Record ???

Hi,
Pricing Procedure and the Schema Grp is defined in Schema Determination in SPRO.
Schema Grp has been assigned in the Vendor Master.
Price has been maintained in the PB00 condition type in the Condition Supplements screen, but shows 'Zero' in the 'Purchasing Org. Data 1' screen of Info Record.
However, while creating PO the system does not pick up the Price from the Info Record and both the Condition Types PB00 and PBXX appears and display the Amount as 0.00 ? Also the system does not take the value entered in the 'Net Price' field and the Price can only be entered manually in the Conditon Type in the Conditions Tab ?
Can anyone help in resolving this issue ?
Lucky.

Hi Lucky
1.Routine 6
This is an example of a pricing requirement. This requirement is met if the condition exclusion indicator is not equal to 'X'. <b>This requirement can be assigned to a condition type in the pricing procedure to ensure that it is not accessed when a condition record with exclusion indicator 'X' has already been found</b>. Condition exclusion is a general tool that can be used to exclude conditions from pricing based on previous conditions that have been found in the pricing procedure. This requirement is intended for use in MM pricing versus SD pricing. For SD pricing, a variation of requirement '2' should be used which would also check to see if the item category is relevant for pricing
2. You have define all your supplementory condition in supplementory pricing procedure and you have to assign this supplementory procedure to your Condition type PB00.Then all these conditions will be displayed at item level for selection in drop down.
Since the supplementory conditions are dependent on PB00, you have assign to the PB00.
If you maintain the values for these conditions in info record, these values will be copied from info to PO.
Regards
Ramakrishna

PO not picking Purchasing org from info record

Hi All,
While creating PO system is not picking Purchasing org??? Rest capturing everything whatever is maintianed.
Please tell me the solution
Rgrds
SS
Edited by: SunilSisodia on Dec 14, 2011 8:59 PM

Hi,
Info record is combination of plant,material and vendor master record,all data from MMR and Vendor get copied into Info record which flow IN PO while creating PO,
when we enter vendor code and material master in PO then info-records come in PO
check following like also
[Info Record: Plant Vs Purchasing Org Level;
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee102f55c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Scale maintained in info records but not picking up in scheduling agreement

Hi,
We have maintained scales for PB00 in info record (subcontracting), this scale is picked up in Subcontracting Purchase Order.
But when we are trying to create Subcontracting scheduling agreement, this scale is not picked up by the system.
Why the system is picking up scales for PO but not for scheduling agrmment?
Regards,

Hey there,
Please check your InfoUpdate Indicator on the scheduling agreement.
The indicator determines which prices and conditions are suggested in future PO items.
Prices and conditions can apply to an entire purchasing organization or to a single plant within a purchasing organization.
For example, if you create a purchase order for a plant for which an info record has been defined at plant level, the purchase order is based on the conditions in the plant info record and not on the conditions that apply to the purchasing organization.
probably your info record is at the Porg level and not at the plant level and hence it's not picking it up.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
Dhaval

Suggestion for not picking up the same record

Hi All,
I have a plsql procedure that picks up the records from the same table from multiple threads. Different threads should not pick up the same record.
Current Logic:
I am locking the row that has been picked up the current thread and the next thread should pick up the next row but unfortunately i have a problem here, The inner query will pick up the same record until the status of that particular row is changed since I am picking them up in a FIFO order.
I am not able to add the lock row in the inner query since oracle does not support it. Is there any other way to do it simpler?
XXRM_ARM_HEADER
header_id
service_id
XXRM_ARM_LINES
line_id
header_id
status
Query
SELECT dl.header_id, dl.line_id
FROM xxrm_arm_header dh, xxrm_arm_lines dl
WHERE dh.header_id = dl.header_id
AND dh.service_id = 4
AND dl.status = 'REQUEST_RECEIVED'
AND dl.line_id = (SELECT LINE_ID
FROM ( SELECT dl.line_id
FROM xxrm_arm_lines dl,
xxrm_arm_header dh
WHERE dh.header_id = dl.header_id
AND dl.status = 'REQUEST_RECEIVED'
AND dh.service_id = 4
ORDER BY dl.line_id ASC)
WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
FOR UPDATE OF dl.status NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED

Robert Angel wrote:
forgive me if I am naive, but why wouldn't each thread updating its selected rows with a nowait and if exception pick the next range mechanism work?It is not that simple. You can get race conditions between threads as they process the same rows in the same order attempting to "beat" one another by being the first to lock it. The more threads there are, the potentially worse this situation.
There's also the issue of performance. The thread concept (aka parallel processing) in this respect has a single primary aim. Increase performance and scalability. But does it?
How is I/O reduced when 50% or more of the reads done by the thread (to find a row to process) is wasted I/O as rows being read have already been locked by other processes/threads?
The fact remains that if you give the same set of rows to a bunch of threads (e.g. DBMS_JOB processes) for processing, they will contend for the same rows. There will be overheads. There will be wasted I/O.
So what I am suggesting is each thread; -
1. Look for rows unprocessed, I usually use atribute field in e-Business suite for this purpose
2. Attempt to update them with nowait, to INPROCESS
3. If 2 fails, try the next range - repeat until 2 is possible or end of rangeAnd step 3 is the one that will waste I/O and waste time - as the time it spend looking for a row to process could have been spend on actually processing a row.
4. You could also improve this by specialising each thread to have its own preferences, if there exists a mechanism that would mean fair distribution between the threads..Yes, and this is a key factor to removing contention between threads, reducing their I/O overheads and reducing their time being spend on finding unprocessed rows to lock and process.
Then there's Oracle technical issues. On 11gr2 for example, despite using skip locked or nowait (that cannot be used together in a single clause like in 10g), I'm seeing deadlocks when threads contend for the same rows. Same code works fine in 10g without deadlocks. So the approach one chooses need careful testing on that specific Oracle version to ensure it behaves as expected and meets the performance requirements.
Bottom line is that parallel processing is not as straight forward as simply slapping a nowait clause onto a select statement in order to skip locked rows.

Price from Pur Info record not picking up

Hi All,
We have a requirement to pick Price from Purchasing Info record for Standard Cost estimate (CK11N/CK40N).
The purchase info record has been created and price maintained in both u201CNet Priceu201D and u201CEffective Priceu201D fields in info record.
I have selected Strategy L Price from Purchasing Info record and maintained sub-strategies 3, 4 and 5 in Valuation variant:
Strategy 3 u2013 Net Quotation Price
Strategy 4 u2013 Gross Quotation Price
Strategy 5 u2013 Effective Price from Quotation
Though I maintained the above, system is not picking up price from info record in CK11N.
Am I missing anything on this?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.
Regards,
Sree

Sreechakravarty,
Per your description, system picked up the price other than the Purchase Info Record price, right? If so, you can try to remove other pricing priorities while only leave the pricing priority "L", and then run CK11N again to see whether system can find the info record, otherwise system will give error message such like "can not find material price in plant code &1/batch &2".
If the system do can not find the purchase info record, you should check anything wrongly maintained to the info record such like valid period. Make sure the valuation date you entered during CK11N should be within the valid period of the info record.

My speaker does not pick up sound when i video with my iphone or use the speaker, yet the voice recorder works?

my speaker does not pick up sound when i video with my iphone or use the speaker, yet the voice recorder works? any ideas why? thanks

Speakers have never picked up sound.
Microphones record sound.

Document not picked in F110

Invoice doc: 5000000001
Due on: 12/30/2008
Baseline date: 11/10/2008
Payment terms: 50 days net due
Vendor master details:
Vendor: 241344
Payment method: E
Payment proposal Details:
Payment run on 12/29/2008 through F110 t-code
Parameters:
Identification:MTR1
Payment method: E
Vendor:1 to 99999999
Result : above invoice doc not picked
Second payment executed on same day 12/29/2008
Parameters:
MTR2
Payment method: C
Vendor: 1 to 99999999
Result: above invoice picked in proposal but not cleared giving error u201CPmnt methods for this run are not specified in master record or in itemu201D.
Again same executed on 30th but not picked but finally picked on 01/02/2009
My question is why document is not picked in MTR1 which has correct values.

Hi
In F110 , when ever you run Payment Proposal , it picks the invoices which are due for the Payment Run date. It also depends on the Next Run Date , Based on the Discount periods of the Payment terms.
In both MTR1 & MTR2 , check your Next Run date.
Regards
Venkat

WICTMS not picking up wip_move_txn_interface records

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for