Wile posting the VF01 -Condition type ZFRI is not showing

Hi friends
My error is While posting vf0r , ZFRI condition type is not showing pls give me t.code for that

Hi Pramod,
Check following things.
Check teh pricing date of the Earlier Quotation.
And now check the Condition reocrds validity date which u created later.
Ur condition record must be valid on the pricing date, thenonly it will be picked up by the system.
After u adjust the validity of the condition record, click update pricing.
also check the material tax clasification in Sales Item level under Billign Document tab, it should be 2, if it is not then change it accordingly and regenerate the pricing.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
for anything further pls revert.

Similar Messages

  • We would like to Use the SKTO condition type as Acrual condition

    Hello Experts,
    We have a requirement to track the possible cash discounts in discounts bucket, Hence we though that we will use the SKTO condition type as a Accrual condition type and post to Accrual accounts at the time of billing document creation.
    While processing the Payment we will clear the bucket with relevant discounts with eligible payment terms.
    We are debating and discussing the use of SKTO as a Accrual condition type and start posting GL accounts with it (This means that we are removing the statistical check box from pricing procedure).
    In a nutshell our requirement is.
    1. Track the cash discounts in a Accrual bucket.
    2. Relieve the accrual when payment is applied (This will be done in Cash app)
    3. What are the consequences of making this change?
    4. Is there a better way of managing this?
    Thanks
    Sreedhar

    Hi,
    Your issue can be solved by CO consultant.
    Your CO consultant can generate report from CO-pa documents.(when invoice is released to a/c ,FI and CO documents are generated) and you know SKTO- cash discount amount even if it statistical condition type.
    You do not need to change in Pricing procedure for tracking  cash discount.
    SKTO is linked wtih payment terms and it is applied accordingly through standard programs.
    thanks,
    Vrajesh
    Edited by: Vrajesh G. Nayak on Jun 2, 2010 5:12 PM

  • How to give the header condition type in the CRM Sales Order for freight ?

    Hi,
         We are creating Sales Order(SO) using FM 'CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE'.And we are unable to track the FREIGHT condition type in the above FM to pass value.
         We want to check this value in CRMD_ORDER tcode.
        Pls let us know how to make it possible of the above issue.
    Thanks,
    Siva..

    Siva,
       I guess you posted in Wrong Thread. You need to post in WAS section.
       check for any BAPI's available in CRM.
    Nagesh Ganisetti.

  • How to give the header condition type in the Sales Order for freight?

    Hi,
         We are creating Sales Order(SO) using FM 'CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE'.And we are unable to track the FREIGHT condition type in the above FM to pass value.
         We want to check this value in CRMD_ORDER tcode.
        Pls let us know how to make it possible of the above issue.
    Thanks,
    Siva..

    Siva,
       I guess you posted in Wrong Thread. You need to post in WAS section.
       check for any BAPI's available in CRM.
    Nagesh Ganisetti.

  • How to change the manual condition type value in change sales order BAPI

    Hi All,
    My scenario here is, i want to either add/change the manual condition type value during change of SO.
    When i'm trying to pass the  order_conditions_in and  order_conditions_inx tables in  'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'.
    Condition type is coming at item level but the value is setting to zero. Pls. help if anyone has any idea how to handle this.

    Siva,
       I guess you posted in Wrong Thread. You need to post in WAS section.
       check for any BAPI's available in CRM.
    Nagesh Ganisetti.

  • To make the Pricing Condition types inactive in Pricing Procedure

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing a senario where, in a sales order, pricing procedure, if one of the pricing condition type does not exist, then two other condition types (even though they are determined by condition records), should be either made inactive or should not appear in the pricing procedure.
    Example: If I have 3 condition types in Pricing Proc say
    YYY1, YYY2, YYY3, then the scenarios are
    a. If one of the condition types YYY1 is not determined, then, YYY2 and YYY3 should not be either determined in the sales order or should be made inactive. This same logic applies to both YYY2 and YYY3.
    b. If all three condition types are determined in Pricing Proc of the sales order, then, the price should be considered.
    If it was just YYY1 then, I could have done it in VOFM by writing a routine and assigning it to YYY2 and YYY3 in pricing proc. However, the scenario is to check the other condition types as well and make YYY1 inactive if any of the other condition type does not exist. Both condition types are determined after YYY1 which is another difficulty.
    I tried creating a dummy condition type  and assigning it to Pricing Proc (at the end of Pricing Proc). For this dummy condition I put in a pricing requirement which checks for all three condition types and if one does not exist, then it make other conitions inactive.
    However, this does not work in VA02 and VA03 as XKOMV is either not getting filled up or even if is getting filled, it is not having the condition type. It some times has condition records, and sometimes not... (not very sure why)
    So, I was thinking of using user exit for the same. However, I was unable to find a suitable user exit for the same where KONV table can be read or XKOMV can be filled.
    Can you please suggest if any user exit can be used for this or if we can implement it in a different way?
    Regards,
    Mukund S

    Hi,
    I think you can use condition exclusion functionality to select best pricing condition from a set of conditions in pricing.  You can compare conditions in many ways.
    I believe you can plot a solution with little research.  The below link is for your reference.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/fr/93/743483546011d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm]

  • How to get the created condition type and make it possible to view it in PO

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me  how to make my condition type created will appear in the condition type selection list.
    Regards,
    Sairam

    Dear,
    You can see the <b>Pricing Procedure</b> & the<b> condition type</b> & analysis in the <b>Conditions</b> tab of the item detail of the PO.
    Pl note the pricing procedure attached to the vendor thro' the <b>Schema group Vendor</b> and analyse for yourself by creating a PO for this Vendor.
    Thanks ,
    Nagarajan

  • Adding the tax condition type after customer pays

    Hi,
    I have a strange situation.
    The customer has payed the invoice amount and evrything is cleared and the complete Order to Cash cycle is complete.
    Now my client wants to charge the customer with the tax amount (implemented later) on the invoice that is already been cleared.And that amount should as usual go to the tax G/L account. There are not many Condiiton types but just the base price condition type and tax condition type.
    I have maintained a necessary condition record for MWST.
    SAP transaction wise I am thinking to create a normal sales order of the invoice amount (Base + Tax condition type) and then complete the order to cash cycle.And once it is completed I would create a debit memo request and subsequent debit memo for the base price which would be adjusted later.
    This will solve my basic purpose of Tax amount goin to the tax account.
    This is only for few SO in the production
    Please let me know in case anyone has a better idea.

    Hi ronaldo
    You create a sales order with document type L2 ( debit process) . so you create the sales order with reference to billing . Now manually you enter the tax condition type (MWST) at the sales order level and then do billing.Make sure that in the tax condition type details you have maintained the option C "Manual entries are possible" .So that you can enter the the tax condition type manually at the sales order level.
    So some additional taxes are being charged to the payer.So he will be paying some extra taxes as he has already paid for the billing document that has been passed to FI
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Condition type in contract not reflecting on to the PO release

    Hi All,
    I have a contract wherein i have two condition types which are set i.e. PB00 and ZM07. Now i've made some changes and removed ZM07 and instead put ZM05.
    This new condition type (ZM05) is not reflecting on to the PO already released or on to the new line items that are being added to the already existing PO's. Kindly let me know what/where to change to effect ZM05 on the line items of release orders.

    Hi,
    One thing you could try is the Update button on the item Conditions detail tab.  Run the selection for B    Carry out new pricing
    C    Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others
    "B" is pretty good for adding in new condition types that are added after the PO has been created.
    Regards.

  • Ranch Billing, the excise condition type JMOD calculation is wrong

    Hi
    I wish to know that in case of Branch Billing, the excise condition type calculation is wrong!!
    I am surprised and unable to know how it could be?
    In billing document display (T.code VF03) , Out of 3 Line items, Basic Excise Duty of 2 line items/ Materials were wrongly calculated.
    i.e. In Item level Condition Overview---> the excise condition type JMOD --> details -->
    Amount                   10.000  %
    Cond.base value            79,077.85  INR
    Condition value             5,733.14  INR
                                                                                    Alt.calc.type   355
    Ideally, It must be 7907.85 INR instead of 5733.14 INR wrong value.
    Please help me to know the possible reason.
    Thanking you.
    PP

    Check the condtion value in condition type UTXJ . If the JMOD value is 10% of UTXJ then assessable value should have been maintained for the Material and Plant combination in J1ID. This is due to Routine 351 maintined in pricing procedure for the condition type UTXJ
    check and confirm
    Senthils

  • Is the Modavatable condition type of Import are loaded on material

    As I know there are seven taxes Basic Customs duty, CVD, Ecess on CVD, Shecess on Cvd, Custom Ecess, Custom Shecesss and Additional custom duty.
    Doubts-- Among these seven duties we get the setoff for for duties on  CVD. Ecess on CVD, Shecess on CVD and additional custom duty. Are this modavatabe duties are loaded on Inventory? If yes then how? if not loaded on material where is the setting for the condition type so that it should not be loaded on inventory.
    Please help me on this point. Hope i will get the solution .

    Hi Rajan,
    As per indian taxation system, you can take credit the duty paid to CVD, Ecess on CVD and SH Ecess and Add. Cutom Duty. Means these are not loaded to material but will get entry in to Cenvat Registers as credit and off-setting to Cenvat Clearing a/c.
    Basic Customs duty, Total Custom Ecess are not allowed to take credit so, they need to loaded on to material.
    To make the system understand this, we give default condition types in Custom defaults in IMG ( As sairam said in his reply). By this setting system decides which all the condition types are loaded / not loaded to material. But loading of CVD and other credit dutyies material does not sounds logical, so please check your scenorio
    Modvat Clearing account you will give it in Comapny code settings for excise.
    Thanks,
    Krishna Reddy

  • The same condition type calculates different amount !

    Hi there,
    On the print out of an invoice (VF03) I have realized that two different rows at the end of the invoice with the same description (Min Freight Charge) display 2x different amount of freight, once I check the condition type, on the header level, I see the same condition type (ZS..) with two different amount. Can anybody explain how can the same condition type (Min Freight Charge) be found calculating 2x different amounts
    Thanks
    Kami

    Hi,
    Check your pricing procedure at SPRO-> sales and distribution -> Basic functions -> Pricing control ->Define and assign pricing procedures ->maintain pricing procedures.
    There might be two condition types used to calculate the frieght value. Each might be assigned with different routines under Alternative formula for condition base value column. I assume only one frieght condition type is needed to calculate the final value with reference to another condition type. Check the settings.
    Regards

  • How to implement the Reference Condition Type

    Dear Friends,
    My Client is using the Refernce Condition type ZMWS which is referencing MWST condition type. He has implemented the same for one company code already. When I am creating a Sales Order, I am able to get the condition type MWST for the newly created condition type ZMWS through the condition record maintained for MWST.
    But when I am doing the same for other company code I am getting a pricing error as it is saying mandatory condition ZMWS is missing.
    I am not getting any clue what to do. Do I need to maintain any settings?
    Thank you,
    Prakash K M

    Dear Prakash,
    In V/06, detail screen of condition type, under under master data you have to give the reference condition.
    Regards,
    Abhee.

  • Purchase order one particular condition type vale should not inventorised

    Dear All,
                       I have a scenario in the purchase order particular one condition type value should not get inventorised that should goes to a seperate account. it should not added with material cost
    i have created a seperate condition type  ZZ01
    with condition class  : A - Discount or surcharge
    calcualtion type : A - Percentage
    and i have attached this condition type to pricing procedure in accurals i have maintained a seperate posting transaction.
    the amount is getting posted against the accural transaction event key.
    but its getting inventorised with material cost it should not get inventorised..
    what is the procedure...
    Regards
    Anand.
    Edited by: Anandhakumar Palanisamy on Mar 24, 2010 1:17 PM

    Hi..
    I have maintained for this condition type Accurals in M/06
    and i have maintained the Statistical tick mark in pricing procedure..
    but its getting inventorised...
    it should not inventorised...
    any other solution...
    Regards
    P.Anandhakumar

  • Condition type freight is not getting displayed in print preview

    Hi,
    I created PO, and while seeing its print preview:
    Condition type freight is not getting displayed.
    Where i missed?
    Uts

    hi,
    Inddition to M/08...(As given above)...
    Also do check the smart form or SAP script...used for the output...check it with the ABAPer...whether the field is liable for o/p or not??
    Smart form is attached at message type of message determination..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

Maybe you are looking for