Will an ATI 4870 on my 8 core macro (4,1) work on PP/CC?

i know it wont be near as good as the newer cards but what i want to know will i even be able to "open" or "install" PP/CC with this older card?
i plan to get something newer soon but want to see how Adobe has done with the OpenCL stuff vs nVidia CUDA.
thanks!
david

i just downloaded a trial of PP CC. it plays as good as it did in CS6 PP as to performance on my ATI 4870. as soon as i start making several CC adjustments on the 3 way color plug the CPU cranks up to about half of its usage on my 2.93ghz 8 core (16 cores counting hyperthreading). im really wondering how good the AMD Radeon HD 7970 @ $399 or the AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB for $219 would fare against the GTX 680 that is now available for the current macpro?

Similar Messages

  • Will the Black 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo MacBook work with the Thunderbolt Display?

    I'm looking into buying a new Thunderbolt Display, but do I need to buy a new MacBook Pro or will the Thunderbolt Display work with my Black 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo MacBook?

    Yes. You'll need to create a Mavericks USB installer from the App Store download, and the App Store is only available with 10.6 and above, so that's a challenge for you to overcome, but that SSD will install just fine.
    Matt

  • Aperture will not run with new ATI 4870

    I just received my ATi 4870 card from Apple today. Installed it in my early 2008 MacPro. Card works fine for everything except when launching Aperture I get the error "The graphics card installed does not meet the minimum requirements for Aperture to run". Huh?? This is replacing a nVidia GeForce 8800 GT. The Ati is a newer, faster GPU than the nVidia and should absolutely run under Aperture. I'm guessing that Apple has not implemented the support for this card in Aperture, which is ridiculous since they're shipping it. Anybody else having this problem? Is there a work around until Apple fixes this?
    Thanks

    Chacro, it's definitely faster than my 8800GT. I don't wait nearly as long for images to render in Aperture, iPhoto, or Photoshop. I work strictly with Canon RAW 5DMarkII files that tend to be ~22-25MB and it loads 'em up like "right now" quick. Overall, I'm happy with it though it was a bit spendy. My advice would be to maybe wait for the nVidia GT285. Rumors are that Apple will be offering that in June, though I don't know if it will only be a BTO option, or sold separately as well. Sounds like that card is going to be just a little more expensive than the 4870, and will pack a full 1GB or RAM. I would have probably waited had I known that was coming when I ordered my 4870. I may wind up selling the 4870 then, or ordering a new MacPro with the GT285 option. Seems I can never have enough power to sling my photos around At the very least, I'll be selling the 8800GT though. Still a great card for someone looking for a bargain
    Thanks again!

  • 2008 2.8 Oct-core ATi 4870 & 10.5.7 display issues

    Anyone else with a 2008 Mac Pro and the new ATi 4870 graphics card? Waited forever for the card, then had to wait another week for 10.5.7. It works, but I get occasional, repeatable glitches on images in Aperture - while cropping images for example. Also sometimes random and not repeatable.
    I left the 2600 card installed (moved it over to slot 2) because I have 2 monitors and didn't buy an adapter for the MiniDisplayPort. 2 CRT monitors - both Viewsonic, the main display on the 4870 is a G225f 22" at 2048x1536 and the other is a P95f+ 19" at 1600x1200. Display issues (chunky repeating patterns diagonally in the image, blocks of digital noise, etc) appear on both displays but not in the same way.
    Anyone know, performance-wise if I would be better off running both displays off of one card?

    There have been issues regarding ATI cards and 10.5.7
    I am into Recording and follow the following forum. There is some discussion there.
    http://www.logicprohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=41255
    Here is another:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2004341&tstart=75
    Message was edited by: fazmanicg

  • Photoshop CS3 allows me to enable Open GL but CS4 does not Brand new MacPro with ATI 4870 card

    Hi,
    I just bought a brand new 8 core Mac Pro and have both the ATI 4870 graphics card and the Nvidia GT 120 card. Pshop CS3 allows me to "enable openGL" in the prefs and utiizes it when doing 3d stuff... however, CS4 has it dimmed in the prefs, thereby not allowing me to check it (it is dimmed and unchecked I should say) and when I do 3d stuff a dialog box saying
    "Your video card does not meet the requirements for hardware-accelerated 3D rendering. All 3D will be rendered with software only."
    any thoughts?
    thanks in advance.

    yeah, short term test deems keeping both cards in.
    So, here are the results: Notes: I have 2 monitors, an Apple 30" and Apple 23". The 30" can only be used in the dual link dvi port and NOT the Mini Display port. Second: The ATI 4870 seems to have an issue with the Mini Display port, it does not work, alone or in tandem with the dual link dvi port being used. Apple is replacing the card (heretofore, I had no cause to use the Mini Display port on the 4870 at all) Third: Only Photoshop CS4 extended was used to see if the card was detected and if it had enabled Open GL
    ATI 4870 - dual link used, Mini Display NOT used: Photoshop sees the card and enables Open GL
    ATI 4870 - dual link used, MIni Display used: didn't test because Mini Display port did not work.
    ATI 4870 - dual link NOT used, Mini Display used: didn't test because Mini Display port did not work
    Nvidia GT120 - dual link used, Mini Display NOT used: Photoshop sees the card and enables Open GL
    Nvidia GT120 - dual link used, Mini Display used: Photoshop does not see the card and thus Open GL is NOT enabled.
    Nvidia GT120 - dual link NOT used, Mini Display used: Photoshop does see the card and Open GL is enabled
    ATI 4870 Dual link used,  Nvidia GT120 Mini Display used: Photoshop does not see a card and Open GL is NOT enabled.
    ATI 4870 Mini Display used, Nvidia GT120 dual link used: did not test because ATI Mini Display port did not work

  • Can I add a second ATI 4870 to my 2009 Mac Pro?

    1. Can I add a second ATI 4870 to my 2009 Mac Pro? Sorry if posted already, I searched and Googled and could not find it.
    2. What is the general consensus on the EVGA GTX285? Will this out perform the 4870?
    I read somewhere that the ATI needs additional power from the power supply and the GTX does not? Is this true? If this is the case are there extra power supply connectors for an additional 4870 (hence my first question).
    The GTX has dual DVI out connector and this is my preferred solution to get 2 x 30" Cinema Displays.
    Thanks in advance,
    MIke
    Message was edited by: Michael710

    1. Can I add a second ATI 4870 to my 2009 Mac Pro? Sorry if posted already, I searched and Googled and could not find it.
    No. Each ATI 4870 needs two auxiliary power connectors. There are only two in the Mac Pro.
    I read somewhere that the ATI needs additional power from the power supply and the GTX does not? Is this true?
    No. Both use two per card.
    If this is the case are there extra power supply connectors for an additional 4870 (hence my first question).
    No.
    The GTX has dual DVI out connector and this is my preferred solution to get 2 x 30" Cinema Displays.
    You can use an adapter to connect a second 30" to the Mini DisplayPort
    <http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB571Z/A?fnode=MTY1NDA5OQ&mco=MjkyNjI0Mg>
    (The latest adapters have new firmware, and shouldn't have problems.)
    If you only need two displays, stick with one graphics card.

  • Instruction of replacing a ATI 1900 for ATI 4870 on MacPro 2,1

    Where can I get visual instruction on installing a ATI 4870 which will replace a ATI 1900 on MacPro 2,1?
    Thanks

    Assuming it's the card made for Mac (and not a PC card that's been altered/flashed to work in a Mac Pro), it really ought to work.
    Drivers for the card aren't available separately anymore. You're absolutely right, they're built into Snow Leopard, but they should also be built into Leopard as well. It's possible that something mucked up the driver installation, to check it simply download and install the 'combo updater' for the most recent version of Mac OS that you're using.
    For Leopard, get the 10.5.8 combo updater here http://support.apple.com/kb/DL866
    For Snow Leopard, get 10.6.3 v1.1 combo updater here http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1017
    Hope that helps!

  • Early 2008 Mac Pro - ATI 4870 - Apple 30'' Monitor - SL .... Does it work?

    I have an early 2008 Mac Pro with a ATI 2600XT on an Apple 30" Cinema Display. I want to upgrade the video card to take advantage of the new features of Snow Leopard.
    Before I take the plunge on buying the ATI 4870 I want to make sure there are no issues with this configuration... Does anyone have an experience with this setup? any issues? ( I assume I will not need to load the drivers since SL should have them)
    Also how is the noise level of the ATI 4870? is the GTX card better in this regards?
    Thanks in advance,

    Other than benchtests and synthetic, there are no OpenCL aware or optimized apps out there. So it is a non-starter I think.
    There are performance tests and depends on what you prefer and type of work. Some places the GTX is better and more RAM might help. The $100 is the other factor.
    The ATI X1900 and 2600 and 3870 didn't look that good to my eye and I use the 8800GT, shame it was dropped, it was a nice card (just needed better $189 price, but that is true of the X1900 ($89?) and others. I think $349 is way too much for 4870 512MB. Flash PC.
    Barefeats has OpenCL TEST in Snow L.

  • New ATI 4870 - No Video with dual Monitors

    I have just received my ATI 4870 and am having some very unique problems. I have a dual display setup (NEC 2690WUXi2, Apple LED CD) running as an extended desktop. I have 2 Intel SSD X25-M in raid 0 as my boot drive in bay 1 and 2 of my Mac Pro 2.26.
    The ATI card will not supply video when booted from the SSDs if both monitors are hooked up. The video stops abruptly right after the NEC is fed a signal and both monitors go blank. If only the Minidisplayport is used I get video and can subsequently plug in the NEC to the DVI port for dual displays. If I boot from one of my outboard clones the system will give me video on both monitors. I am also able to boot successfully from a SATA clone in Bay 1.
    The computer boots flawlessly with 2 monitors when using the stock GT120 video card - this is from any source SSDs, outboard, etc. I have a 'clean' install of OSX with no programs that also has the same problems - no video from the 4870 and works flawlessly with the stock GT120.
    If both video cards are installed I have a flawless boot. The NEC is attached to the ATI card and the Apple LED is attached to the GT120. Everything works like a champ. My thoughts are that this may be some timing issue with the SSDs and the ATI card when used alone. I can't think of any other explanation. Does anyone have a suggestion if I want to use just the ATI card?

    You're sig says you have a 2009 mac pro. If so, you shouldn't need the drivers anyway as your 10.5.6 preloaded should already be the "special" version.
    The beta drivers link pretty much pertained only to 2006 to 2008 mac pros ordering the 4870. As their 10.5.6 was the "plain" version.
    What might be a culprit is that apple is shipping updated versions of the 4870 (different device/revision IDs). The beta drivers were taken from pre-release builds of 10.5.7 sent to devs. Maybe the updated versions are not jiving with the beta drivers, and made in particular for 10.5.7.
    Well if any consolation, 10.5.7 may be as close as this week.
    http://gizmodo.com/5241438/mac-os-x-1057-update-may-hit-this-friday

  • P45 diamond, Vista64, ATI 4870 BSOD (incompatable???)

    Well, I took the plunge on the P45 Diamond (MS-7516, PCB v 1.0) with the hopes of making a nice OC'r. Everthing was going fine on install until I loaded the ATI 4870 drivers, after which Vista 64 boots, I logon, then about 10 sec. later, BSOD. This is repeatable. I updated to AMI BIOS 1.4 (with great help from the Forum USB Bios Tool!!). All went well. Reinstalled the latest 8.9 ATI catalyst driver (Vista64) for 4870 and same thing. Vista 64 boots, I logon, then 10s later - BSOD. I can roll back with system restore and all is well. But after I reinstall - same thing. I've updated the Intel drivers, etc. Would be nice if the 'Live Update Online' worked, but I can manage with the manual method. PSU is a 750 PC P&C, so it shouldn't be a power problem. Memory is a 2MB Patriot Viper DDR3 PC3-1600 (2000 MHz). No OC'ing yet, just trying to get the 4870 running. Temps are way cool, CPU ~30C, GPU is cool via touch. I read some other threads about the 4870 problem, but looked like BIOS flash was supposed to cure. The 4870 is a Sapphire, w/ 1GB memory. Any suggestions? Thanks!

    Quote from: dcoil on 18-October-08, 08:30:40
    Problem RESOLVED! MSI Tech support notified me that ATI put a new driver for the 4870 (8.1) on their web site yesterday. I was a bit skeptical, as I've put several BIOS updates on and several ATI drivers on, and always ended with the same exact problem. But willing to do 'whatever' to get my hard earned cash operational, I installed the new driver and Voila! Problem resolved. Thanks also for your help and assistance Bosskiller.
    dude, where did you get your 1.51 bios update? i searched and all i got is 1.50.. did you checked if you also installed your sm bus driver? because that's what screws my video card..

  • ATI-4870 Diamond Power Cables - Where oh where?

    I am tiring to put an ATI-4870 Diamond into my MAC Pro, the ATI-X1900 that is being replaced only uses one PCI power cable. I need to get one more. If you look careful, you will see that MAC Pro's have a smaller PCIe power block on the mother board, and the connection to the X1900 is a normal sized 6-pin block.
    Please, help me find one of these special 6 pin power cables.
    Message was edited by: bketrick
    Message was edited by: bketrick

    <http://cgi.ebay.com.sg/NEW-MAC-APPLE-ATI-X1900-6-PIN-PCI-EXPRESS-POWER-CABLE-/3 50362120793>
    The Apple version of the card should have come with two cables. If it isn't the Apple version, it won't work with OSX.

  • How quite is the ATI 4870 from Apple?

    I was planing on upgrading my stock AT 2600XT that cam in my MacPro(2008) with the new ATI 4870 to take advantage of Snow Leopard. My question is in regards to noise. How does the noise compare with the stock 2600XT card
    Thanks in advance

    Sure, use a splitter, or simply plug the Accelero into the existing card fan socket if you like, although I've read that powering the fans this way means that they are monitored and under dynamic control of the card. In this config. the Accelero can produce slightly higher temps than the stock cooler. The stock cooler was so d@mn loud during load that I think its management is deliberately curbed to the detriment of the card running temps, so will affect the Accelero rpm. (one can control the fans easily on PC-bootcamp side via RivaTuner, but NOT on Mac side AFAIK).
    see: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/630/4
    +In our tests with a Radeon HD 4870 Accelero Twin Turbo achieved a performance worst than ATI’s stock cooler when we connected the reviewed cooler to the standard fan connector available on the video card (the temperature of the air being thrown out of the system dropped dramatically, however, from 63º C to 51º C). So we recommend you to connect the reviewed cooler directly to the system power supply.+
    +You have two options when connecting Accelero Twin Turbo to the power supply: 7 V (lower fan speed and thus lower noise level) or 12 V (higher fan speed and thus higher noise level). At 7 V Accelero Twin Turbo was a little bit better than ATI’s stock cooler, but if you are really worried about temperature you should run this product at 12 V, where it lower the GPU temperature by 15º C, memory temperature by 12º C and the hot air being thrown out of the system by amazing 26º C. The heatsink was running 11º C cooler than the heatsink from the stock cooler, which is nice.+
    HOWEVER, what they forget to factor in is that the Accelero does not actively vent hot air out of the case, and that is why I mounted another 80mm fan on the back of the card slots. It works great! All for about $50.

  • P965 Neo-F & ATI 4870 or 4850

    I have a P965 Neo-F Mobo, and am looking at installing either an ATI 4870 or ATI 4850 graphics card. Will either of these card work OK? I read that the 4870 needs 2 x 6pin connectors (not sure about the 4850) - does the board have these features?

    Quote
    I have a P965 Neo-F Mobo, and am looking at installing either an ATI 4870 or ATI 4850 graphics card. Will either of these card work OK?
    Should works.
    Quote
    I read that the 4870 needs 2 x 6pin connectors (not sure about the 4850) - does the board have these features?
    Those are power cable connectors, mainboard has nothing to do with that. It depend of your PSU used.

  • Getting Asus ATI 4870 to work in my Mac Pro. Not working. please help!

    I read here on these boards that an ATI 4870 would work in an early model (in my case, 2006) Intel Mac Pro.
    I jumped in hastily and bought the Asus branded card: EAH4870
    I connected it, and nothing... did not work.
    I do not think it is a Mac version of this card, perhaps intended to be used in a windows machine.
    Questions:
    - Do I need to "flash: this card to make it work in my Mac Pro OSX 10.6.3?
    - Are there Mac drivers for this card? I can't find anything anywhere
    - Basically, can I get this card to work, or do I need to PAY the extra $$$$ just to have a "Mac" version of this.
    Keep in mind, I am not a techie, I need to do Work, not fiddle with this kind of stuff.. unfortunately, a software package crucial for a job is very finicky and works with only a handful of cards.. The 4870 is one of them.
    I do not have dual boot, and no windows machines to "flash" or rework this card.
    If you can help me to get this card to work, it would be MOST appreciated!!!

    It is not a Mac version. It does not have the required EFI boot ROM needed to work on the Mac. Video drivers are contained in OS X. Either you have to have the card flashed (this is illegal) or buy a Mac version of the card.
    If you aren't a "techie" then you don't have the hardware needed to flash the ROM nor know how. Because this site belongs to Apple we cannot help you with something that is illegal.

  • ATI 4870 DVI-VGA not working.  Help?

    Howdy folks,
    I was using an ATI 4870 with two DVI ports and one S-Video port on a Mac Pro 3,1 (I think) running osx 10.5 with two monitors
    When we retired that computer I harvested the 4870 card to replace a GT 120  on a Mac Pro 4,1 running osx 10.8.  It has been feeding two monitors without issue, one DVI and the other DVI-HDMI.
    However, I cannot seem to get it to recognize any VGA monitor or projector using any of three different connectors.  Nor can I seem to get any signal out of the S-Video port. 
    My goal is to run a VGA projector with the Mac Pro 4,1, a projector with VGA, S-Video, and RCA inputs. 
    As I said, I have tried three different DVI to VGA connectors.  Two of these are very similar with 29 pins on the DVI connector.  These did absolutely nothing.  The third has only 17 pins, and while it had no result with projector, when connected to a VGA monitor the computer would recognize that a second monitor was attached, but no signal seemed to be carried to that monitor.  The osx settings showed options for two monitors, but no image appeared on that second monitor.
    One of the two DVI to VGA connectors I had successfully used on the previous Mac Pro 3,1 computer, but I cannot remember if it was with the 4870 or the graphics card we used before upgrading.
    A Macbook using a MiniDVI to VGA connector feeds a signal to the projector without issue.
    If this community can offer any help or guidance, I would be very grateful.
    Best wishes-

    The signals used for VGA are generated directly by the DVIO-I port on the graphics card, and are supplied in the bar at the right end, the four pins around it, and one pin from the top row of the grid (salmon/pink in the diagram above). A VGA adapter has no active components in it -- it just picks up those five signals and presents them on the proper VGA pins. The bar is used as the common return.
    A failure is to produce a signal is not likely to be a failure in the adapter, but a failure on the graphics card.
    DVI-I (Digital AND Analog) has the bar and the four pins around it present.
    DVI-D (Digital only) has no bar, and the pins around it are not populated.
    Diagram courtesy of Wikipedia.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Best wired solution to control an iMac from 2 other screens/KB/mice

    Hi, I've got an iMac model 12,2  installed upstairs in my house and I want to be able to control it (use the OS and the data) from downstairs and from the attic, using a keyboard, a mouse a screen and speakers. Both "consoles"  will be used to avoid

  • Call a function module from CRM 5.0 via ITS to FICA

    Hi I want to call a function module in FICA (FICA is using sapgui) from CRM (IC-web) via ITS (Not integrated in FICA) Is it possible and how should this be done??? If someone know how, please help BR//JL

  • MTS and 8.1.6

    Can anyone tell me if the problem with mts and error messages "Load Indicator not supported by OS !" in the alert log has been fixed in 8.16. I am running 8.1.5, and turning off mts fixes the problem. I will be migrating to 8.1.6 soon, and am trying

  • Basic customs and import cess flowing in MIGO

    Hello , At present basic customs and import cess are flowing in the MIGO document,. The requirement is not to display the basic customs and import cess to flow. Please let us know the config related to it thanks

  • RequestDispatcher error

              hi           while using the the forward method in RequestDispatcher, i encounter the error below. it is complaining that it cant find the method "RequestDispatcherImpl.forward".           as my machine has a few different JDKs, is there th