Will LR v1 support DNG full resolution embedded previews?

I would like to know if LR v1 will support the DNG full resolution embedded JPEG previews; and if not, will we be seeing a new DNG Converter along with the release of LR v1 that will support the full res previews as well as the new tonal adjustments from LR and ACR4? One or the other will be required in order to fully incorporate LR into a true DAM (Digital Asset Management) workflow. I view this as an essential feature and hope it has not been overlooked. Thank you very much.
Dan Altick

Here's another vote for full sized previews in LR DNG files. I know this feature didn't make it into v1.0, but it would be nice if it could be added in a v1.x release. This feature is far too important to many to let it slide until v2.0.

Similar Messages

  • Is my external monitor's full resolution supported?

    My new 13" Macbook Pro came with the Nvidia 9400M graphics card installed.
    I also purchased a 26" external graphics monitor with 1920 x 1200 screen resolution, plugged in through the Mac's mini-DVI port.
    My intended use is photographic processing (non-video).
    I get a monitor message under "Display Preferences", "Usable resolution 1280 x 800" when this external unit is selected.
    Can this card support the full resolution of this large external monitor?
    Thanks for any feedback.
    Don Bethel
    Santa Fe, NM

    Yes, it certainly can. But your MBP doesn't have a mini-DVI port; it has a mini-DisplayPort. Exactly how are you connecting that to the external monitor?
    If your external monitor is limited to 1280 x 800, that's a clear indication that you are in Display Mirroring mode instead of Extended Desktop mode. The latter will enable your external display to operate at its native resolution.

  • Monitor no longer mirrors at full resolution

    I have a 1080p monitor. The mac is not able to output to this at full resolution when the displays are set up to 'mirror' (connected to 2011 macbook pro via DVI- thunderbolt adaptor used).
    Previously in Snow Leopard I was able to attach the monitor (via DVI with a thunderbolt / mini display port adaptor), close the lid of my macbook, then insert a USB device, to wake the computer from sleep mode. Upon waking from sleep, the computer would detect the external monitor and display at full 1080p resoltion. The lid of the computer could then be opened to use the laptop keyboard and trackpad.
    In Lion, the above process works, however when the lid of the laptop is opened, the detect display process seems to run again and the laptop screen turns back on and the external display will no longer mirror at full resolution.
    I already have an apple wireless keyboard and mouse, but am using these with another computer- so cannot use these with the laptop (this configuration would allow me to work with the laptop lid closed, and hence keep full resoltion on the external monitor). It isn't practical to get 2 wireless keyboards and mice, so I'm looking if Apple will support mirroring the display at full resolution (or indeed just the ability to turn the laptop monitor off, to allow the 2nd display to run at full resolution...)
    (Works fine on the same macbook pro when running Windows 7 in Bootcamp, so must be technically feasible).

    I have a 1080p monitor. The mac is not able to output to this at full resolution when the displays are set up to 'mirror' (connected to 2011 macbook pro via DVI- thunderbolt adaptor used).
    Previously in Snow Leopard I was able to attach the monitor (via DVI with a thunderbolt / mini display port adaptor), close the lid of my macbook, then insert a USB device, to wake the computer from sleep mode. Upon waking from sleep, the computer would detect the external monitor and display at full 1080p resoltion. The lid of the computer could then be opened to use the laptop keyboard and trackpad.
    In Lion, the above process works, however when the lid of the laptop is opened, the detect display process seems to run again and the laptop screen turns back on and the external display will no longer mirror at full resolution.
    I already have an apple wireless keyboard and mouse, but am using these with another computer- so cannot use these with the laptop (this configuration would allow me to work with the laptop lid closed, and hence keep full resoltion on the external monitor). It isn't practical to get 2 wireless keyboards and mice, so I'm looking if Apple will support mirroring the display at full resolution (or indeed just the ability to turn the laptop monitor off, to allow the 2nd display to run at full resolution...)
    (Works fine on the same macbook pro when running Windows 7 in Bootcamp, so must be technically feasible).

  • Will my Airbook (11" late 2010) w/ NVIDIA GeFORCE 320M 256MB using the Mini Display Port to Dual-Link DVI Adapter support the Dell 3007WFHC (30") monitor at full resolution (2560X1600)

    Will my Airbook (11" late 2010) w/ NVIDIA GeFORCE 320M 256MB using the Mini Display Port to Dual-Link DVI Adapter support the Dell 3007WFHC (30") monitor at full resolution (2560X1600).
    Works fine at 1280X800 (with out without MDP DL DVI Adapter) - cannot get any higher resolution

    Hi ddickson01,
    The MacBook Air 11 inch late-2010 model does support 2560 x 1600 resolution on an external display. See this specifications article for reference -
    MacBook Air (11-inch, Late 2010) - Technical Specifications
    Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
    Sincerely,
    Brett L 

  • Will we ever see full-resolution video out on 5G ipods?

    hi!
    i'm an independent filmmaker. it would be very very useful for me if i could store all of my movies on my video ipod at full resolution (720x480) so I could basically carry a backup of all of my work with me at all times. it'd be especially useful for pitch meetings & stuff.
    does anybody know if apple plans to support full tv resolution at any point in the future? that would really make the video ipod an unbeatably awesome device!

    I think the real question here is if Apple will make it so that, with an iPod and AV cable, you can watch a movie on a easonable sized TV without the currently obvious lack of resolution.
    I would assume that in the future, the iPod will be able to, because if not, there was really no reason to make the AV output in the first place. I'm sure no one is really using it now, since the quality looks so bad; If you're trying to watch LOST or Desperate Housewives you may as well power up the VCR.
    As for right now, I've heard of some people using Videora with certain settings and getting higher resolutions to work on the iPod. I haven't been able (as of yet) to figure out how to do it, but there's got to be a way.
    Sorry I couldn't be of more help.

  • Iphoto does not support the resolution of my dslr camera...how do i upload full resolution photos?

    iphoto does not support the resolution of my dslr camera...how do i upload full resolution photos?

    You actually need to give information to get help - just stating an abstract problems (which is most certainly not a problem at all) gives the volunteers hearer nothing to work with to help you
    What version of iPhoto? Of the OS? What exactly is the problem (iPhoto does support the resolution of your camera so that is NOT a problem)? what exactly are you doing? What error messages do you get? why do you incorrectly think that iPhoto does not support full resolution?
    At this time your question is like my car won't start - why not? Could be anything from you did not put the key jun to being out of gas to having the engine stolen - no way to tell anything - except that the problem you claim is not true (at least in my example I would know that the car did not start)
    LN

  • Which version of Firefox will support HTML5 full?

    Why Firefox not support HTML5 full? Which version of Firefox will support HTML5 full? i know that none of browsers support HTML5 full. but Google Chrome supports more than Firefox.
    When Firefox will support HTML5 full?

    What about CSS3 ? is not fully standardized yet? Where is the CSS homepage?

  • Will Oracle BPA support full BPMN 2.0 ?

    Will Oracle BPA support full BPMN 2.0 and its conversion into BPEL 2.0 in new releases ? Or is it better to use JDeveloper with it BPM extension?

    Hi,
    Depends on what you expect from Oracle.
    +11gR1 and 11gR2 are fully supported (premier support). 10gR1 and 10gR2 are in extended support. About 9.2 it's a bit more complicated and the general extended support ended : check note 161818.1 for further details.+
    After the extended support there is still the sustaining support.
    Read that to understand the notions :
    http://www.oracle.com/us/support/library/lifetime-support-technology-069183.pdf
    Best regards
    Phil

  • Why can't I get the full resolution on my Ultrawide monitor when connected to my MBP?

    I just purchased an LG Ultrawide 29" monitor to hook up to my Macbook Pro (Mid-2010 model). The full resolution should be 2560x1080. The only cable that came with the monitor was an HDMI to HDMI cable, so I used a miniDisplayport to HDMI cable that I had. The screen popped up on the monitor, but it was stretched out, and there was a message saying it wasn't configured to the full resolution (and that I need to change it in the Display settings). The problem is there's no option in the Display settings for anything larger than the 1920x1080 standard resolution for this monitor.
    I checked the manual that came with the monitor and it mentions that using an HDMI cable with a mac won't allow me to use the full resolution (or sound for that matter). It says instead I need to use a DVI-D dual link cable to get the monitor to work properly with a mac. Only problem is, this particular monitor doesn't have a DVI port on it (I think the manual was referring to a similar but possibly older version that had HDMI, Displayport and DVI ports on it). This one only has two HDMI ports and one Displayport port on it. I browse around online for people that had a similar problem, and I see a comment saying I just need to get a miniDisplayport to Displayport cable and then everything will work fine. I finally bought said cable (which a lot of places apparently don't carry), plugged everything in, and still no dice. The only resolution options for the monitor are still 1920x1080 and less.
    Is this a problem with my Macbook? From everything I've looked up, my graphics card (NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M) should support it, and it says right on the packaging for the Displayport cable that it should support up to a 2560x1440 resolution.

    Yeah, that's what I ended up doing. It just wasn't worth the hassle. I got a good (standard size) monitor for about half the price of the old one, so I'm not too disappointed. Thanks for your help though

  • HDMI to DVI adapter not allowing full resolution when using Mac OS but does with Windows 8.1

    I have a Mac Mini and using the HDMI to DVI cable that came with the computer the maximum resolution it will allow is 1280 x 1024. I have 2 of the same monitors. The other is connected with DisplayPort to VGA adapater and displays full resolution (1920 x 1080) on both monitors but the HDMI to DIV will only show 1280 x 1024.  I thought maybe it was my DVI cable or the adapter but when I boot up in Windows 8.1 through bootcamp both monitors display at full 1920 x 1080 resolution. Why does Windows give me the option for full resolution on both but the Mac OS doesn't? All the latest updates have been installed. I've contacted support and all the things they had me do didnt work. I see all these posts with people complaining about the same resolution issues. Is it that difficult for this to work?

    Humm... the dual Samsung 21.5" monitor setup on my 2010 Mac Mini running Mavericks works a expected.One is on the HDMI to DVI adapter and the other in on a Kanex Mini DisplayPort to DVI adapter.
    Try > Display Menu from the Mac App Store and see if you can select 1920 x 1080 for both monitors using it.
    Addtitionally, are you sure that it the HDMI to DVI monitor that is not getting the correct resolution...? Most people are complaining that it is a VGA connected monitor that is not getting the correct resolution.
    If it turns out to be VGA connected monitor, then try using a Mini DisplayPort to DVI adapter and DVI cable for that monitor instead of VGA.

  • Full Font embedding in PDF

    A couple of years ago, I set up some Distiller profiles to fully embed fonts into my PDFs. No subsetting allowed.
    Since then, I've been using Indesign's PDF Presets, which used my created profiles, to create these same pdfs. Now that I have an issue that I need to investigate, I checked my PDFs in Acrobat and find that all my fonts are embedded subsets.
    Now when I try to open Distiller 9 it locks up on me and I'm unsure why. Cannot find a key combination to release Distiller's settings that choke it.
    But reading about on these boards, I'm getting the sense that perhaps I cannot fully embed anymore? I've made PDFX 1a, 3a, and 4 and find they are still subsets. These are mostly Type 1 and OTF, with a couple of TTF's mixed in.
    What is best practice so that a PDF that is provided to printer, etc has the full font embedded, provided the permissions for the font is set?
    thanx, sam

    PDF font embedding/subsetting is the current operation - there were just too many issues with indexed fonts with the old PDF export engine (lack of Il8n support, must deploy font files with the PDF, lack of proper barcode support etc).
    The engine will still index fonts if it tries to use font that's unavailable or not subsettable on the runtime system, and defaults to the Java default fonts.
    That's not something I recommend - font substitution to the default Java fonts would play havoc with your report formatting.
    PDF font subsetting is currently the way all current Crystal Reports engine works.
    Sincerely,
    Ted Ueda

  • Photos cannot find my the full resolution of my images.

    I create a book in Photos.
    I save, close, power off.
    Next day, the full resolution version of lots of images are apparently missing from the book.
    If I locate the missing image in Photos, export the original, reimport it and place the reimported image on the page, it works.
    How can this be avoided?

    With the volume mounted you can use the demo version of iPhoto Library Manager to rebuild the library and it will make the rebuild library an "managed" library.  However, you must have iPhoto 9.6.1 in order to do so.  If you don't have it you can get it from the App Store by following the instructions in this post:
    Terence Devlin including Apple logo changes for feature 126 Apple image including Apple logo changes for feature 126 Apple image ends here
    Apr 14, 2015 11:21 AM
    Re: Is Iphoto gone ? i want it back!
    in response to Johannes666
    Recommended
    [DocumentBodyStart:d25bf602-029a-4466-b895-2ab6c98bb4c9]
    Go to the App Store and check out the Purchases List. If iPhoto is there then it will be v9.6.1
    If it is there, then drag your existing iPhoto app (not the library, just the app) to the trash
    Install the App from the App Store.
    Sometimes iPhoto is not visible on the Purchases List. it may be hidden. See this article for details on how to unhide it.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4928
    One question often asked: Will I lose my Photos if I reinstall?
    iPhoto the application and the iPhoto Library are two different parts of the iPhoto programme. So, reinstalling the app should not affect the Library. BUT you should always have a back up before doing this kind of work. Always.

  • I am showing firefox in my tray but when I click on it, it will not open to a full screen. I have been using it up until today without a problem in Windows 7

    When I put my mouse over the firefox icon in the lower tray it shows small pictures of the home page but when i click on these they will not open to a full page. I am using windows 7. This problem just started today. I can use internet explorer without a problem. Thanks for any assistance you can give. I contact HP and they said to contact your support as they only support internet explorer.

    below is what I get with the dev.jeffersonscher.com etc. url. But what do I do with this information? I can launch safe mode, but I still get only the 2" icon/window of Firefox.
    JavaScript Browser Tests
    navigator object properties
    navigator.userAgent = Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)
    navigator.appName = Microsoft Internet Explorer
    navigator.appCodeName = Mozilla
    navigator.appVersion = 5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C)
    navigator.platform = Win32
    DOM methods/collections
    if(document.getElementById) = true
    if(document.layers) = false
    if(document.all) = true
    window properties
    if(top.window.moveTo) = true
    if(top.window.moveTo(0,0)) =
    The following data is reported by a server running Microsoft IIS server and ASP:
    View selected http headers at <a href="svrvars.asp">svrvars.asp</a>

  • MacBook Pro and External Display on full resolution

    I want to use only my external 20" cinema display, connected to my MBP. So what I do is connect the display via the DVI cable, close the lid of the notebook, wake it up from the keyboard/mouse (now I have the full resolution of the Cinema Display), open the lid so I can use the keyboard and the trackpad. This is all right with me, but when I restart or after sleep MacBook's display turns on and is set up as primary and the Cinema Display goes to Dual View mode. Is there a way the laptop to remember the external Display as primary, so I don't always have to close the lid, wake up the laptop and open the lid.
    For instance, when I've done this for the first time in Windows, I didn't have to do it again. Now every time I log in in Windows, the macbook's display automatically turns off and the Cinema Display gets its full resolution. This is what i want to be done when I boot in Mac OS.

    I know both scenarios (OS X/Windows), but I'm pretty sure that there's nothing you can do about it. As long as your internal display is open while waking from sleep or booting up, it will be always on in OS X. I'm only using my external Cinema Display and keep the MBP's lid closed all the time. Of course, I use an external keyboard and mouse as well. You can only choose which display has the menu bar on it, but you can't turn it off without sleeping the Mac. In Windows the ATi/Nvidia drivers take care of your settings, but it won't be applied until you get to the Desktop, so you'll still have the internal display on while booting Windows...
    Björn

  • How do i export multiple full resolution movie files at the same time in final cut pro 6?

    I've been using Final Cut Pro since version 3 came out, know the program well, have even had jobs consisting of just operating the program.  I'm currently running version 6 because that's the latest one that works on my computer.  Back in verison 3, there used to be an option under Export to export a "Final Cut Pro" movie, which was really a Quicktime movie but appeared with a FCP icon and defaulted to opening in FCP, but the important thing about it is that it was a full resolution copy of the movie with no compression.  Now, that option seems to have been changed to "export Quicktime movie."  In my opinion that change is kind of stupid since it is so much less specific and is even less of an implication that one is exporting a full resolution file.  But in fact you are.
    One also has the option of using Compressor to export a version of a movie, and therein there are so many different options that if you are not confused by it I think there's something wrong with you.  Moreover, it would appear that there is no equivalent of exporting a full resolution version of a file in Compressor.  Fair enough: a full-resolution file involves no compression so is not appropriate for "Compressor."  BUT, suppose you want to export multiple uncompressed, full-resolution movies at once.  When you use Compressor, you are able to create batch lists and export many things at the same time, for instance, lists that will take many hours to complete so you can go to bed and get the results the next day.  But as far as I can tell there is no way to do this at full resolution without compression.  Instead you have to sit at the computer waiting for each one to finish and after each one, manually go to the next and select "export Quicktime movie."  Even if there is a way to do this I would complain that such an obviously desireable thing is so unaccessable.  In fact, the only reason I've typed out my question at such length is because I'm stuck here waiting for each one of my movies to export.
    Anyway, all my complaints aside, anyone know how to do this?

    what you're missing to export multiple files is the batch export command available in the file menu or by control clicking on the items in the browser.  You can export multiple sequences/clips at full resolution with this.
    This has been available in fcp for a long long time.
    Wow, you are right.  Now that you mention it, I can't believe I never noticed that.  Thanks.
    Only if you have the 'Self-Contained' box checked.  Otherwise you'll end up with a reference movie.
    Correct.  That box is typically checked by default.  There are other default settings you could change that would not result in a full-quality version, but what I meant was hitting that option from the pull-down menu, then changing nothing and hitting ok.

Maybe you are looking for