Windows 10 Upgrade Support

As many of you have noticed that Microsoft’s new operating system - Windows 10 will be available on July 29, 2015.
For notebooks which have the latest OS Windows 7 or Windows 8/8.1 update, they can get a one year free upgrade to Windows 10. (All upgrade process can be done online until July 29, 2016.)
MSI Notebook team has been working hard to get everything ready before Windows 10 is officially launched and provide the best user experience to our Windows 10 upgrade users. If you’re interesting in Windows 10, please stay tuned.
For those of you who can’t wait till the official release, use the MSI BurnRecovery tool to create the recovery media before upgrading your system to Windows 10. We can’t guaranteed that all features can work properly on Windows 10’s preview versions.
*If you would like to return to your original system, there are two ways to do so:
1. Use “Windows settings” function to restore back to your original system.
2. The recovery media can help you restoring the system back to the factory settings.
Find more detail information about the preparation before your Windows 10 upgrade and how to use the "Windows Settings" to restore the system:
[FAQ] What should we know before we start Windows 10 upgrade?
Find below guides to know how to create & use the recovery media:
1. How to create the system recovery media by using MSI BurnRecovery tool?
2. How to use the recovery media made by MSI BurnRecovery (disc or USB flash drive) to recover the system?
More information about Windows 10’s upgrade support, please visit Microsoft’s official website.

Hi, I believe more to come but at the mean time, please read: http://www8.hp.com/us/en/ad/windows-10/coming-soon.html http://h20435.www2.hp.com/t5/367-Addison-Avenue-Blog/HP-s-Journey-to-Windows-10/ba-p/99214#.VZjz-EbVvxj Regards.

Similar Messages

Windows XP support/upgrade??? S.O.S...

Any help much appreciated! Thank you...
1) If I continue to use Windows XP on my older PC mainly for word processing and pix storage etc, will I still run into problems?
2) If I can no longer use Windows XP due to the end of its support, why am I only being referred to "Windows 8.1" and "buying an updated NEW computer." Is there really no other operating system that I can upgrade to like such as Windows
7, 8 or even Windows Vista?? When I ran the windows upgrade assistant for Windows 8, I received the following as not compatible (not sure how important they are...):
Install an app to play DVDs
You may need to install an app to play DVDs in Windows 8.
Your processor doesn't have NX turned on or might not support NX
Setup will attempt to turn on NX during installation. If your processor doesn't support NX, the installation will be cancelled and your PC will roll back to the current OS.
Secure Boot isn't compatible with your PC
Your PC's firmware doesn't support Secure Boot so you won't be able to use it in Windows 8.
Your screen resolution isn't compatible with snap
If it's possible, change your screen resolution to at least 1366 x 768 to snap apps.
Adobe ExtendScript Toolkit 2
Adobe Systems Incorporated
Not compatible
Microsoft Security Essentials
Microsoft Corporation
RADEON X800 XT Secondary
ATI Technologies Inc.
ATI Control Panel

Any help much appreciated! Thank you...
1) If I continue to use Windows XP on my older PC mainly for word processing and pix storage etc, will I still run into problems?
2) If I can no longer use Windows XP due to the end of its support, why am I only being referred to "Windows 8.1" and "buying an updated NEW computer." Is there really no other operating system that I can upgrade to like such as Windows 7, 8 or even Windows
Vista?? When I ran the windows upgrade assistant for Windows 8, I received the following as not compatible (not sure how important they are...):
1) If that PC is not on the internet there is nothing that will stop it from functioning. Just be sure that you have up to date anti-virus and if it is on the internet, that there is a hardware firewall via your ISP equipment.
2) Windows 7 is still available from newegg.com
Please do not read this sentence. Please ignore the previous sentence.

Does Windows 7 support FAT32 format?

I'm wondering whether Windows 7 support FAT32 format. And which format (FAT32 or NTFS ?) is recommended when using Boot Camp to create a partition for Windows XP and maybe upgraded to Windows 7 or something.
Thanks!

I'm wondering whether Windows 7 support FAT32 format.
Windows Vista and Windows 7 can't be installed onto a FAT32 partition. Use NTFS.
(46118)

Window upgrade

When I get notified that a window upgrade is available, I run it and it downloads and installs it but when you tick to restart the computer it starts but the states that it cannot complete the downloads and proceeds to remove all date that has been done.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi @Gary46 ,
Thank you for visiting the HP Support Forums and Welcome. I have looked into your issue about your HP Pavilion dv6-3180ea Notebook and issues with updates. I would just ignore the update. It does happen from time to time that the update will not go through as your system is already updated and that is why it fails.
Here is a link to the HP Support Assistant if you need it. Just download and run the application and it will help with the software and drivers that might need updating on your system.
It shows me that there seems to be interference with Software task, usually your virus protection.
You might have to disable this software and then run the Windows update.
I hope this fixes things up for you.
Thanks.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom to say “Thanks” for helping!

I purchased FrameMaker 10.0 Windows Upgrade License from FM9 and I can't find the download for this.

I purchased FrameMaker 10.0 Windows Upgrade License from FM9 and I can't find the download for this.

Get in touch with support if it doesn't show up on your Adobe account.
Mylenium

Arch Linux 32x64 bits, Developers and Window Managers Support

Greetings!
After having some time issues due to college that prevented me from this, I wish to have again a rolling-release distro in my computer.
I was in the past a big fan of Gentoo, but now it seems too much work to compile everything from scratch. Also they seemed to have some issues with the developers - the original developer if I understood correctly has quit the project, others were forced to quit due to misbehavior, etc. - and maybe due to some other facts their popularity on distrowatch dropped drastically.
Then this year I've tried Debian Testing... My goodness, that was messy. Tons and tons of bugs on XFCE, like thunar hanging on load and displaying error messages, gedit not removing the ~lock files properly on close, so I had the myfile and ~myfile, and many others. Really, I gave up.
I wish to give Arch Linux I try then. Of course that would be quite stupid to ask if arch linux is the best choice in an arch linux forum, but there are some key points that if you could answer would help me a lot to give it a try:
1. 32x64
"Should I use 32-bit or 64-bit?" is NOT the intended question. Many still prefer 32-bit-pae on a 64-bit capable machine, others prefer 64-bit. I wish to use 64-bit. Made my mind. But I would like to know if the support of 64-bit on Arch Linux is as good as 32-bit and if it comes by default with cross-libs which makes me able to run 32-bit applications natively right out of the box,
2. Developers
About how many and what's their relation with the users? When I've googled for Arch Linux, I've had found a review video on youtube where some guy said in the comments that developer's mind changed a lot in the past 2 years and they introduced many buggy packages that required manual workaround. At the end of his comments, he said "Sympathy? Apologies for the ****? Nope. blame the user for trusting 'pacman -Syu'" Surely I don't know which are these options because I haven't read about pacman yet (just know it's the default package manager) but you get the idea.
Another key question: Is Arch Linux hiring new developers over the time? Replacing the ones that leaves for the many reasons?
3. Window Managers Support
With Gnome3's overall rejection (including mine), we have only two options: Switch to KDE or try other Window Managers. I still wish to have faith on gtk, so the first option is still not considered by me. I don't wish to know "which one is the best", because that's another large discussion just as the 32-bit x 64-bit. Just how good is Arch's support (updated constantly? bug-fixes?) on:
- XFCE
- MATE
- Cinnamon
(Of course there are others like LXDE, Enlightenment, etc. but I've decided to narrow down to XFCE even having quite bad experiences on Debian Testing.)
4. Package Manager
Last, being a rolling-release dist, can I add an option for a specific package to install a specific older version and/or not upgrade when you tell the dist. to upgrade everything? I remember that back on Gentoo I could edit a text file and just type the version of the package I wished to keep and the "update everything" option wouldn't touch the package (worked also to try new versions that were still not stable enough).
Any replies will be very appreciated. Sorry for the long post.
Best regards.

I'll start at the end with #4. Of course on the arch forums you will get people who are biased towards liking arch - but I think if you ask in other communities you will regularly hear that arch's package management system is its greatest strength. Pacman is the primary tool for this, but we also have makepkg for things in the Arch User Repository (AUR), and the Arch Build System (ABS) to recompile anything from the main repos with additional/alternate compilation options.
But for your direct question, there is an option to only upgrade to a particular version of a given package. There is an option in pacman's configuration file for just this purpose. However depending on what the package is, this could lead to problems. Users are discouraged from updating most of their system while keeping some older packages - This can lead to issues with shared dependencies. Of course if you build the package from source (AUR or ABS) yourself, such issues would be easy to resolve. Is there a certain package you know you'd want to keep at an older version? If you tell us what it is, we can give more specific information on how easy/hard it would be to accomplish.
#3: Arch is a DIY distro. You choose whatever window manager / DE you want. I can vouche for XFCE working wonderfully in arch. There are also numerous archers who use mate and cinnamon. I have heard of some problems, but (AFAIK) these have nothing to do with compatibility with arch, rather these are due to upstream issues. In other words, cinnamon, mate, xfce, or any other WM should work just as well on arch as on any other distro. I'd bet our wiki for installing and configuring those WMs are better than those of the distros that bundle the WM with the core install. (In addition to package management, you will find the arch wiki is second to none).
#2: I can't answer with any specifics - other than to say they continue to do an excellent job. I am not surprised by the youtube video - not because I'd agree with it, quite the opposite. But as arch is a DIY distro it puts some responsibility on the user to maintain their own system. If one is not prepared for nor willing to do this, they often become frustrated and end up blaming someone else. Often this is the developers, sometimes it is the forum moderators, other times it is the whole arch community. In every case these accusations are absurd. Your questions on replacement of developers is a good question though - there is a history page on the wiki which might give some insight on this, but I suspect others will have better input on this.
#1: I use i686 (32bit) on two of my computers and it works perfectly. It sounds, however, that a majority of the community uses 64bit (which I just updated to on one of my computers). My 64bit system works perfectly as well, but I don't have any 32bit-only apps. Occasionally there are forum threads about some issue or another with "multilib" applications which are 32bit programs run in a 64bit system. Generally these threads seem to be resolved without much hassle. You can search for some of them yourself: Skype seems to be a common topic of such issues.
All in all, I'd reiterate arch's strengths in it's package management and wiki/documentation. Potential weaknesses could be found by users who are unwilling or unable to take responsibility for their own system. I word this is a bit biased manner - there are many people who have no interest in being responsible for maintaining their own system, a majority of all computer users would fall into this category; most of them would be quite unhappy with arch linux. If you were happy with gentoo in the past and only want to avoid constant recompiling then you probably would be one who could be very happy with arch.
Or an even shorter summary: try it out. If you don't like it, switch.

Windows 7 support UEFI

When looking at what Macs got *+official support Windows 7+*
Pivots on EFI (no support) or UEFI 2.x (supported)
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3920
Same was true with with Vista 64-bit.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1846
Apple adopted Intel's EFI in 2006 (the Macs that don't get official Windows 7 support) and UEFI in early 2008.
A better boot manager and other changes I'm sure, not just a new set of drivers though, even those are also critically needed.
What UEFI Can Do For You :
has sections on industry support; storage partitioning with GPT, even Apple Boot Camp.
http://maximumpcguides.com/windows-vista/convert-a-mbr-disk-to-a-gpt-disk/
http://www.techotopia.com/index.php/AddingNew_GPT_and_MBR_Disks_to_Windows_Server_2008Systems
Technical Note TN2166: Secrets of the GPT
http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/technotes/tn2006/tn2166.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-uefi-firmware,2486-7.html
UEFI 2.3 supports 64-bit kernel mode; Windows 7 64-bit; and supports boot volumes greater than 2TB, addressing more memory (Mac side as well).
http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=EFI&i=58377,00.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFI
http://www.uefi.org/about/
Microsoft firmware system guide:
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/firmware/uefiguide.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/firmware/default.mspx

I hope I'm not misinterpreting you, but you're actualy saying this update could be more like a UEFI-update?
That is exactly what I was hoping for. Dump this whole "protective MBR"-****, and go fully UEFI

HP LaserJet and Color LaserJet - Windows 7 support

To help customers successfully use their products with Windows 7, HP has identified recommended drivers per product. Please visit the following support documents for more information:
HP LaserJet and Color LaserJet - Windows 7 support
Deskjet, Officejet, or Photosmart
If you are having an issue with a windows 7 software install or driver, please start a new thread for greater visability.
I am an HP employee.
Say Thanks by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
Please mark the post that solves your problem as Accepted Solution

Not to be confused with the title of this thread, because this tool will not work with installing most LaserJets, but try the HP Printer Install Wizard and let me know any error messages you get.
I will need to know quite a bit of information before I can be of much assistance, otherwise:
1. What error messages are you getting (ex. fatal error 1603)?
2. How are you trying to connect the printer (USB, wireless, etc)?
3. What happened when you used the HP Print and Scan Dr?
Lastly, If you do not answer these questions and others I know I will have, then I wish you the best of luck with your printer installation. Do not be mislead, just because I do not work for HP doesn't mean I'm not an expert.
Don't forgot to say thanks by giving "Kudos" if I helped solve your problem.
When a solution is found please mark the post that solves your issue.
Every problem has a solution!

Where can I find Windows 7 support files for Mac?

While in the process of creating a partition with Boot Camp, I was unable to download the Windows 7 support files. Is there a link to someplace I can get them elsewhere? Will Windows 7 work in Boot Camp without them? Thanks!
Daniell

Oh, okay. I was hoping they were available somewhere online since I'm having such difficulty downloading them through the Boot Camp Assistant. Thanks anyway.
Daniell

Load balancing 10g forms - Connection from new browser window not supported

Load balancing 10g forms - Connection from new browser window not supported
We're experimenting with using webcache to load balance between multiple applications servers running OC4J forms processes.
We currently have one machine with infrastructure and mid-tier (BI & Forms) installed, which is being used for the webcache functionality, this is load balancing between 2 other servers each of which just have the mid-tier (BI & Forms) installation
In order to get this to work, I had to follow the instructions in the Forms deployment guide : http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_11/web.1012/b14032/tuning.htm#sthref707
The main gist of this is that you need to set the following in the orion-web.xml file in order that the sessions are maintained:
<session-tracking
cookies="enabled">
</session-tracking>
This all works fine in most cases.
The problem I am having is if I do one of the following on the client machine:
1) From IE6 / IE7 run a copy of a forms application. Then open a new window using the "New Window" menu option, and attempt to run another forms application.
2) In IE7 or Firefox 2.0 open a copy of the forms application, and then open a new tab and try and open another forms application.
If I try either of these I get a FRM-92101 error, and the following is displayed in the java console:
oracle.forms.net.ConnectionException: Connection from new browser window not supported
From trawling various forums (including metalink and otn) it looks like a problem with the way coockies are handled.
Unfortunately the usual workaround is to ensure that the session tracking option in the orion-web.xml file is disabled.
The problem is that I need this enabled in order for the load balancing to work.
Does anyone know of any other workarounds or patches that might help resolve this?
We're using Application server 10.1.2.0.2 running on windows 2003 servers.

You were right. Carriage returns were stopping it from working (the document is laid out over separate lines, so I assumed it would make no difference...).
I've now managed to get it so the forms at least run, but they are all being run in the forms OC4J instance on the same machine as the OHS.
Has anyone actually managed to get this to work, or am I doing something wrong?
I did wonder if using an OHS instance on a machine with no forms installation would make any difference?
I had raised a support call via metalink on this subject, but they eventually came to the conclusion that the only way to do this is with a hardware load balancer (Despite several documents suggesting that webcache is the way to go (including the forms deployment manual)).
I'm at the point now of giving up and writing some custom scripts to do the job instead...

MacBook Pro won't download the Windows 7 support software

My mid 2010 13" MacBook pro cannot download the windows 7 support software from bootcamp. Bootcamp claims that it is not connected to the internet, however, it is. I have tried connecting to the internet via ethernet also, but no success. Is there a fix to this problem or maybe an external link?

Boot Camp 4.0 FAQ

Windows 2008 R2 domain controllers with Windows 2003 forest functional level Supported after Windows 2003 support ends in July 2015

Hi
Anyone knows whether Windows 2008 R2 domain controllers with Windows 2003 forest functional level will still be Supported after Windows 2003 support ends in July 2015 ?
Thanks

When Windows Server 2003 support ends, you should not have a Windows Server 2003 Domain Controller running if you would like to be supported by Microsoft. This means that there will be no reason to have a DFL or FFL that is lower than Windows Server 2008.
So, if you are keeping Windows Server 2003 FFL to keep DCs running Windows Server 2003 then this is not supported.
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile

Does window 98 support jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4 server

Hi,
I have a window 98 as my platform,i want to load jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4 will window 98 support this server base,basically i want this server to be loaded for working in jsp,ejb and servlet.Can any one help me reagarding this matter.Or what other server will work on windows 98.Thanking you.Where else can i get examples of how to run the jsp,ejb and servlets examples.
vinay

Tomcat is written entirely in java, so it can run anywhere you have a JVM! However, it only supports JSP and servlets. For ejbs, you will need another container. Try JBoss... www.jboss.org.

About windows 10 supporting indian regional languages. especially on phones.

I'm presently using lumia series phone which has windows 8.1. And does not support many indian languages. But the pc version of windows 8.1 supports the aforesaid. Hence the windows 10 is universal OS across devices, will that support indian languages
on all those devices?? Moreover, i'm requesting you to develop a typing software for indian languages as like as google input tools.

Hi,
Since Windows 10 final edition is not released, it's hard to say if Windows 10 or Windows Phone10 support Indian language. However, if you have any suggestion with Windows new product, you can post your suggestion by using Windows Feedback in Windows 10.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

Transferring windows software support

When a try to transfer the windows software support from un extern driver, or CD or DVD, the Boot Camp Assistent (4.0 / Mac Mini) show this message: It´s no did possible to transfer the Windows Software Support because don´t exist un internet conection active. How to proceed if exist un internet conection active? Thank you.

I will give that a try later today it sounds promising and Thanks

Windows 10 Upgrade Support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for