Windows 2003 server access getting slow from Windows7/8 client

We have Windows 2003 Enterprise Server. If I try to access through Windows 7 or Windows 8 client PC then I am getting very slow access. Slow access in terms of, if I am taking remote desktop of server [OR] if I directly browse server directory [OR] even
accessing any web application on server it is very slow.
But if I am accessing though any Windows-XP base client or even other servers having Windows 2003 or Windows 2008 then access in good.
But interesting thing is even we have other Windows 2003 server for which I am getting normal response.
Can someone guide me on the same? I am not able to understand the root cause of it.
-Abhay

Start with decreasing SMB version in clients. For inspiration look here
http://www.petri.co.il/how-to-disable-smb-2-on-windows-vista-or-server-2008.htm
Rgds
Milos

Similar Messages

Slow connection with OS X 10.7 while trying to access a Windows 2003 server

Good afternoon:
I am a systems engineer in an enterprise environment that is now deploying Macs and I have been finding that the Macs have a very slow connection to the Windows 2003 server; even after installing all necessry components.
All of the Macs access network services via Active Directory
The issue is the connection speed when trying to access folders on the servers.
Does anyone have any ideas as to speed up this connectivity issue?

Did you resolve this issue? Any links to anwers to this?
thank you.

Printing from CS3 under Vista to Windows 2003 server print que very slow

I just upgraded one of my machines to vista with CS3. I normally print to a windows 2003 server print spool que. When I go to print it takes forever to pull up my different printers and then go to properties. On my XP machines there is no problem, I can select the print que, go into properties for my printer and it works fine. Something with Vista, CS3 and WIndows 2003 server?
Thanks

shadeDream
Im curious about your 802.1x issues are. Im testing user profiles VS login window profiles for 802.1x on our Cisco wi-fi LAN right now, and I'm scratching my head on how the login window profile is actually supposed to work. Its a chicken-and-the-egg situation for me. I cant use user login window profiles, I have to use user profiles, which don't work very well in my environment for various reasons. Granted, it has improved since 10.5.3, but its still not working as I expect it to work. Do you have a Apple Discussion post related to this issue I can read?
Sorry for hijacking this discussion with off-topic content...

OS 10.3.9 and Windows 2003 Server - Can't get to the network

My company just up graded from a Windows 2000 to a Windows 2003 server. I am lone Mac user. Yesterday, with Windows 2000, I had no trouble accessing several drives on the server. Now with this upgrade, I can't log on to any of the drives.
The IT folks are not that Mac savvy and they've tried a few things regarding security, but they're lost, and haven't found anything from Microsoft that helps. And I know nothing about networking. I've tried searching Apple but can't find anything specific to this problem. I can print to all the networked printers, just can't get to the drives.
Is there something we're missing here? Something in my System Preferences that we needed to adjust first?
Thanks.
Power Mac G5 Mac OS X (10.3.9)
Power Mac G5 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

My company just up graded from a Windows 2000 to a Windows 2003 server. I am lone Mac user. Yesterday, with Windows 2000, I had no trouble accessing several drives on the server. Now with this upgrade, I can't log on to any of the drives.
The IT folks are not that Mac savvy and they've tried a few things regarding security, but they're lost, and haven't found anything from Microsoft that helps. And I know nothing about networking. I've tried searching Apple but can't find anything specific to this problem. I can print to all the networked printers, just can't get to the drives.
Is there something we're missing here? Something in my System Preferences that we needed to adjust first?
Thanks.
Power Mac G5 Mac OS X (10.3.9)
Power Mac G5 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Query very slow on Windows 2003 Server

Hi,
Our customer is running 10g on Windows 2003 server. Some queries perform badly. I imported the data into a 10g DB on Linux (at our office) to analyze and test. Strange enough the same query takes more than 10 times longer to run on the Windows machine compared to the Linux. The Windows machine is dedicated to Oracle, it is not 'overloaded'.
SELECT
plan_task.id_task,
plan_task.task_id,
plan_task.taskdef_y_n,
plan_task.description,
plan_task.status,
plan_task.team_id,
plan_task.activity_id,
plan_task.task_start_datetime,
plan_task.district_id,
plan_task.task_end_datetime,
plan_task.taskdef_freq_code,
plan_task.taskdef_start_time,
plan_task.taskdef_end_time,
plan_task.order_nr
d,
PREVENT.PLAN_PERSONS_AVAILABLE_SHORT(ID_TASK) PERS_OK,
PREVENT.PLAN_MATERIALS_AVAILABLE_SHORT(ID_TASK) MAT_OK
FROM PREVENT.PLAN_TASK
WHERE (TASKDEF_Y_N='N') AND (TASK_START_DATETIME>=to_date(to_char(SYSDATE,'dd-mm-yyyy'),'dd-mm-yyyy'))
AND (TASK_START_DATETIME<to_date(to_char(SYSDATE,'dd-mm-yyyy'),'dd-mm-yyyy')+1)
ORDER BY DESCRIPTION;
On LINUX (Intel 2 GHz, 2 Gb mem) takes 0,5 seconds to execute (46 rows returned)
================================================================================
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 27 Bytes: 2,436 Cardinality: 29
     4 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 27 Bytes: 2,436 Cardinality: 29
          3 FILTER
               2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PREVENT.PLAN_TASK Cost: 26 Bytes: 2,436 Cardinality: 29
                    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PREVENT.PLAN_TASK_START_DATETIME_I Cost: 2 Cardinality: 30
On WINDOWS (Intel 2 GHz, 2 Gb mem) takes 11 seconds to execute (46 rows returned)
=================================================================================
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 35 Bytes: 3,276 Cardinality: 39
     4 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 35 Bytes: 3,276 Cardinality: 39
          3 FILTER
               2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PREVENT.PLAN_TASK Cost: 34 Bytes: 3,276 Cardinality: 39
                    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PREVENT.PLAN_TASK_START_DATETIME_I Cost: 2 Cardinality: 40
NOTEs:
- The data is exactly the same on both machines
- I analyzed_schema on both machines/DB's before running the query
- The SGA size en DB_BUFFERS are (almost) set to the same value
- Oracle version is the same: 10g

On Windows:
- I exported the data
- Re-created my 2 tablespaces, to set: extent management local, uniform 1M
- imported the data
- dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats( option=>'GATHER')
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 36 Bytes: 3,32 Cardinality: 40
     4 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 36 Bytes: 3,32 Cardinality: 40
          3 FILTER
               2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PREVENT.PLAN_TASK Cost: 35 Bytes: 3,32 Cardinality: 40
                    1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PREVENT.PLAN_TASK_START_DATETIME_I Cost: 2 Cardinality: 41
Tested, takes 7 seconds now (was 11), but this is still slow compared to the run on Linux
Grt, Stephan
Edited by: Stephan van Hoof on Jan 9, 2009 8:41 PM

Trying to access Windows 2003 Server share with Mac OS 9.04

Hi
I cannot connect to a Windows 2003 Server share on my 2003 domain. I can access the share with my MacBook (10.4.9) & my G4. I have File Services for Mac installed & can ping the server from all OS 9 Mac.
Can anyone give me some tips?
MacBook Administrator

How are you trying to connect to the server? Via AppleTalk or IP? (What utility are you using to ping the server from the Mac OS 9 machine?) Since you're not providing any information about error messages you're receiving or the symptoms of your problem I can only provide the following information.
If you're selecting the server from a list in the Chooser and clicking the OK button then the connection should switch to IP automatically. Make sure your Mac has TCP/IP enabled and is receiving an IP address or that you have an appropriate IP address hard-coded. You can try forcing an IP connection by entering the IP address or DNS name of the server in the Chooser rather than selecting it from the list in the Chooser.
Or you can try forcing an AppleTalk connection by selecting the server in the Chooser and holding down the Option key as you click the Connect button. If you're asked to enter your name and password then you're communicating properly with the server. This is, however, a very slow connection compared to IP.
Finally, be sure you update to the latest version of Mac OS 9, which is 9.2.2 <http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=75288>.
Hope this helps! bill
1 GHz Powerbook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Oracle 10G slow Performance on Windows 2003 Server

Hi there,
Looking for a little assistance in locating a bottleneck that's started to hit our system this week. It's really odd because it's been starting around 10am every morning this week.
today is the worst that I've seen it because it's almost brought the system to a halt.....
We're running Oracle 10.2.0.1 64b on Windows 2003 Server 64
The server has 16 processors and 64GB of RAM currently the CPU is sitting at 5% and the RAM usage is at 16.4GB
It's a blade server with a SAN backend and I'm assuming the latency is coming from the disk but I need to determine this for a fact.
I've only been a DBA for about a year and I'm stilling learing how to locate and identify issues. According to OEM I'm seeing
a ton of I/O from the users. So anyways, any help or insight would be much appreciated and a learning experience for me.
Thank you for your time and asistance.
SB

Thank you for the reply!
We've had finding one FOREVER, I can't resolve it and I've read somewhere to ignore because OEM is false reporting. I'm adjusting DB_Cache now...
Isn't possible that too much cache could be bad for the system and cause slow downs?
FINDING 1: 100% impact (29725 seconds)
Significant virtual memory paging was detected on the host operating system.
   RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 100% benefit (29725 seconds)
      ACTION: Host operating system was experiencing significant paging but no
         particular root cause could be detected. Investigate processes that
         do not belong to this instance running on the host that are consuming
         significant amount of virtual memory. Also consider adding more
         physical memory to the host.
   RECOMMENDATION 2: DB Configuration, 100% benefit (29725 seconds)
      ACTION: Consider enabling Automatic Shared Memory Management by setting
         the parameter "sga_target" to control the amount of SGA consumed by
         this instance.
FINDING 2: 51% impact (15210 seconds)
The buffer cache was undersized causing significant additional read I/O.
   RECOMMENDATION 1: DB Configuration, 9% benefit (2685 seconds)
      ACTION: Increase the buffer cache size by setting the value of parameter
         "db_cache_size" to 7568 M.
   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
      The value of parameter "db_cache_size" was "6912 M" during the analysis
      period.
   SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
      SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
               (84% impact [25073 seconds])

Has anyone managed to get a 3TB dynamic disk on Windows 2003 Server?

I just got a pair of new 3TB disks that I wanted to put on my Windows 2003 server enterprise x64 system, SP2, all updates installed.
When I first tried to convert to dynamic, I got the error "The operation did not complete" as described in this KB article
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/826823
It says there is a patch, but there is not one for x64, just x86 and ia64
I found another technet discussion here: https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverfiles/thread/cb62238c-b3d0-4989-b45a-ae6de6701a7b?stoAI=10
However its best suggestion is to use a product from AOMIE, but I tried that and it didn't even recognize the disk. It also suggests that one needs a better version of diskpart.exe and to try to the 32 bit version. Anyone have any experience
with that?
I also tried creating moving the disk to Windows 7 x64, making it dynamic there, but when I move the disk back to 2K3 it does not recognize it, and goes back to a 2TB partition. I also saw something about needing a 512 block size for 2K3, but W7 does
not allow anything smaller than 1K.

Hi,
During my research, if found the following artcle which also mentioned a 3TB disk should be supported in Windows 2003 SP1:
Has anyone managed to get a 3TB dynamic disk on Windows 2003 Server?
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverfiles/thread/a720ae72-0c04-44dd-94c0-2e6aecce530e
So I contact the author about this issue. He said it could be caused if your hard disk is a 512e drive as the 3TB drives on the market today are normally 512e drives.
However manufacturers stopping identifying this, and if the controller is old, FSUtil will not able to identify a 512 drive but recognized it as a normal 512n drive.
Thus please provide the drive model so we could search on manufacturer's website for exact information.
Also please paste the screenshot in your reply which Satish mentioned if available.
In addition, here is an article Robert provided:
http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/what-would-microsoft-support-do/support-advanced-format-hard-drives-141584

Clean Access and Windows 2003 Server

I am trying to install the Clean Access Client on a VM running Windows 2003 Server. When I connect to our customer's network the VPN client appears to connect properly and I see the Clean Access window. Then it all seems to fall over. My customer tells me I should see a blue window with a red OK button on it but I never see it. As a result I never get completely into the network. Is this because I am running this on Windows 2003 Server or should I be looking at something else? Can this run in a Virtual Environment and on 2003 Server?

I work it out partially by myself:
1)
(excuse me, I meant "kinit and Krb5LoginModule" not "kinit and kinit.exe").
Krb5LoginModule seems to work now (with TCP). The output is:
KRBError:sTime is Tue Jun 01 17:13:51 CEST 2004 1086102831000
suSec is 945761
error code is 52
error Message is Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP
realm is SSOTEST.RTC.CH
sname is krbtgt/SSOTEST.RTC.CH
KrbKdcReq send: kdc=rtcnt978.ssotest.rtc.ch TCP:88, timeout=30000, number of retries =3, #bytes=232
DEBUG: TCPClient reading 1496 bytes
KrbKdcReq send: #bytes read=1496
KrbKdcReq send: #bytes read=1496
EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.DesCbcMd5EType
KrbAsRep cons in KrbAsReq.getReply sso_testuserCommit Succeeded
Which is what I want (it tries first with UDP, then the KDC says the TGT is too big for UDP and the client tries again with TCP)
2)
I still have the error :-(

Accessing a Windows 2003 Server

Hi; this question may have been dealt with already but I'm new here so please indulge me a bit. My office network runs on windows 2003 file server but I just got myself a MacBook Pro. I can see the file server but can't access it. I have MS Office for Mac 2004 installed (Student edition)
Should it be possible for me to access files on a file server that runs on windows 2003 server? If yes, what do I need to do on either my Mac or ask the admin to do on the server?
Cheers

I'm also running several Macs on a Windows Small Business Server (Windows Server 2003) and the only way I am able to pull up the files was to join each one of my Macs to the Windows Server's network domain. You have to do this through the Directory Utility in the Utilities folder. There is one draw back from what I can tell, and it's something that I need some help with. It seems that once a Mac (running Leopard) is joined to a Windows domain, it takes the log in process forever to finish. Logging into a Leopard Mac alone is pretty quick, but after joining the domain, logging into any of the Macs on the Windows domain takes over a minute. If anyone knows the answer to this one, I'm all ears.

Very long search times from an IMac running 10.6.7 Snow Leopard when searching for files on a windows 2003 server

The issue is as follows:
The Imac is connected to the windows 2003 server via SMB type connection.
There are four sub folders in the main directory. We go to one of the sub folders in this case Server.
We go to search window and type the file name that we want to search such as test .
The choices selected for search parameters are Server for location and contains (same results if picked by file name)
Search takes roughly 6 minutes before it returns the result.
If we do the same search on the old Mac Server it will take 15 seconds to complete using same search parameters.
Any ideas on how to speed up search times to the Windows 2003 Server? I have tried going to finder preferences and removing the sharing section. That did not help.

Okay, I've....
1) Reinstalled XE, to start from scratch
2) Went in to SQL*Plus, did a "create pfile from spfile;"
3) Shutdown the database
4) Started it up in MOUNT mode
5) Ran NID, to change the database name from 'XE' to 'CTXMGMT'
6) Shutdown the database again
7) Edited the pfile to change the database name (i.e. "db_name='CTXMGMT'")
8) Started up the database
And that worked! So that's good... but now my question is:
How do I change the SID for the database? Currently, the instance name for the database is still 'XE'....
SQL> select instance_name
2 from v$instance;
INSTANCE_NAME
xe
I'd like it so a connection could be made to the database with the tnsnames.ora file looking like this:
CTXMGMT =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(Host = rodin)(Port = 1521))
(CONNECT_DATA = (SID = CTXMGMT))
Could someone explain how to get the database to this state? Thanks.
- Gary

Oracle 10g Universe Connectivity From 64bit Windows 2003 Server

Hi,
Have an existing BO XI 3.1 environment built on a 64 bit Windows 2003 server and
I'm having problems getting it to communicate with Oracle 10g universes. Works fine
with its SQL Server 2005 repository and SQL Server 2005 relational/olap universes, but
cant seem to get it to work with Oracle.
Universes work fine on the 32 bit development environment talking to the same Oracle
database, but when move them to 64 bit testing environment they all fail with
Oracle ora-12154 errors.
32 bit Oracle client is installed and can communicate fine with other products using ODBC
connections from the server - but BO refuses to communicate.
Any ideas other than reinstalling BO under 'Program Files' rather than 'Program Files (x86)'
as I've seen some references on the web about this possibly being a problem?
Thanks.

Hi,
Oracle 32 bit and 64 bit connectivity work fine from the server. The problem seems to
relate to bug 3807408 in Oracle 10g that cant handle parentheses in directory names.
So BO being installed in u2018C:\Program Files (x86)\Business Objectsu2019 causes it to get
rather annoyed.
SAP Note 1202730 does cover this, but our DBA's aren't too keen on installing the
suggested patch. I'm also not very keen on reinstalling BO in a different directory as
we've got working production sites that would have to be rebuilt.
So now investigating whether using the Oracle 11g client will resolve this.
MSDN forum topic http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/sqlintegrationservices/thread/ab662d63-6385-4f73-b27f-d526048f601f/ gives a pretty good overview of what people have been trying to resolve this.

Error in accessing application on windows 2003 server

error on accessing the application on windows 2003 server R12
500 Internal Server Error
Servlet error: An exception occurred. The current application deployment descriptors do not allow for including it in this response. Please consult the application log for details.
First time i login sucessfully but now its not working.

Hi Mushy;
500 Internal Server Error
Servlet error: An exception occurred. The current application deployment descriptors do not allow for including it in this response. Please consult the application log for details.First try to run autoconfig and retest issue. If you have still same error check log file for more details
Also check:
500 Internal Server Error Servlet error:
500 Internal Server Error Servlet error:
R12 Startup Issue
Regard
Helios

How to run a java program in windows 2003 server from unix server.

Hi ,
I want to run a java program in windows 2003 server from unix machine ..
will RMI helps me to obtain this.
Please tell me the procedure to do this.
Thanks in advance,

rmi,web services,corba,web 2.0,xml,xls,dtd,rss,ruby on rails,https,soap,tags,blog,podcast,google

Converting a Database from Windows 2003 Server to HP-UX Itanium

Hi
I have to convert a database Oracle11g (11.1.0.6.0) from Windows 2003 Server to HP-UX Itanium. Both installation are in the same version. I know there are methods to convert it with RMAN ( Restore/Recover converting the database files ) or with transportable tablespaces. Can you give advices or comment me your experiencies on it ?.
Thanks

The RMAN's convert command is going to be needed if the endian format of both the o/s is not same. I didn't check this so please check that whether the source and target are on the same endian or not. If not, you must use the RMAN. If yes, then using transport tablespace would do the job.
HTH
Aman....

Windows 2003 server access getting slow from Windows7/8 client

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for