Windows 32 bit and solaris 64 bit

i am configuring a rman repository database in win2k server(oracle 9i 32 bit).The target
database is on solaris 9(64 bit).Wheter is there any conflict or problems between these 32
bit(rman repository) and 64 bit(Target database).
with regards
ramya

Don't worry about this. The repository database holds only metadata about the target database, but no real data (from the target) itself.

Similar Messages

Oracle 9.2.0.2 for Windows XP 32 and Solaris 64 bit

When will a version of 9.2.0.2 be available for Solaris and Windows XP Pro 32bit? I only see Windows XP 64 bit for this version.
I have some software that uses the oracle database and it seems to require 9.2.0.2.
Thanks!

Download 9.2.0.1, and then the 9.2.0.2 patch from Metalink.
Alison

Windows XP SP2 and Solaris 10 x86- Dual Boot, Single Hard Drive

I recently decided to look into installing the newly available Solaris version capable of running on my personal x86 Intel workstation (Solaris 10). There were quite a few hurdles, however, in getting the system to install, detect devices and associate drivers with compatible hardware. Here�s the process I went through to get my system configured to run both operating systems on a single hard drive:
(Note- This is something of a layman�s guide. I apologize if there are any errors. I didn�t see anything similar on the boards, and felt obligated to contribute. I highly encourage posting corrections.)
Read more: http://ryanhornbeck.com/content/view/85/2/

Here are a few reference websites that helped me along the way:
http://multiboot.solaris-x86.org/v/1.html
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/archive/20/2005/04/3/279197
http://www.sun.drydog.com/faq/
http://www.cs.uu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/Solaris2/x86/FAQ.html
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Operating_Systems/Solaris/Q_21244455.html
Hope they help.
Ryan

Dual boot WIndows 8.1 and Windows 7 (32 bits) from separated disks gives error 0XC0000359

Hi all,
I have two disks, each with a (OEM) installed OS on it, a Windows 8.1 (64 bits) and Windows 7.0 (32 bits). The later came from mine old computer that unfortunately died to soon. So I have two disks and two OS in an brand new machine (with UEFI BIOS etc.).
Installing a dual boot option was a pace of cake. However booting into Windows 7.0 gives following error:
"Windows failed to start. A recent hardware of software change might be the cause.
File:\Windows\system32\winload.exe.
Status: 0XC0000359
Info: the application or operating system could't be loaded because a required file is missing or contains errors".
There is lot discussions about installing two OS but that is not mine problem: both are already installed.
Also there is much rumour about the UEFI BIOS and support for older systems. In mine medion computer the Security Boot option is disabled (by the OEM), so booting from a old BIOS should be possible, must isn't.
Someone advised me to run the recovery disk (of Windows 7.0) and run Bootmgr. However the system refuses to boot from CD/DVD with the recovery disk of Windows 7.0 inserted, booting from the recovery disk of Windows 8.1. goes fine.
Removing the disk with Windows 8.1 installed on it and directly booting in Windows 7.0 fails too with the message: "Reboot and Select proper boot device or: Insert boot media in selected boot device and press key". Also in this case the system
refuses to boot from the Windows 7.0 recovery disk.
Could you please help me?

Hi,
To rebuilt boot loader, I suggest we can try following command when you enter Windows 8.1.
Run cmd as administrator and type following command:
BCDboot [Partition Letter with windows 7 installed]:\windows
Note: if you installed Windows 7 on Partition F, the command can be write as: BCDboot F:\windows.
Then, restart and boot into Windows 7.
What’s going on?
Kate Li
TechNet Community Support

I tried to install iTunes 10.6.1 for Windows (64 bit) and it says "A required iTunes component is not installed. Please repair or reinstall iTunes. (-42404). I have tried uninstalling everything and reinstalling and it still does not work.

I tried to install iTunes 10.6.1 for Windows (64 bit) and it says "A required iTunes component is not installed. Please repair or reinstall iTunes. (-42404). I have tried uninstalling everything and reinstalling and it still does not work. I then restored my computer to a week ago and tried to download and install the update and this came up again.

Check out this thread:
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3677426?start=0&tstart=0

TS3212 i am trying to download itunes 10.7. i have windows vista 32-bit. when i click on download. the pop up window comes up and ask to save or cancel, and then the webpage says thank you for downloading. it hasn't downloaded it. what can i do to fi

i am trying to download itunes 10.7. i have windows vista 32-bit. when i click on download. the pop up window comes up and ask to save or cancel, and then the webpage says thank you for downloading. it hasn't downloaded it. what can i do to fix this?

I'd first try downloading an installer from the Apple website using a different web browser:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
If you use Firefox instead of IE for the download (or vice versa), do you get a working installer?

I have a 64-bit Windows 7 PC and a much-loved 2008 iPod Classic 120Gb. I recently updated iTunes to V12.1. I no longer have the 'info' legend in 'settings' and am unable now to update my calendar and contacts. Help!

I have a 64-bit Windows 7 PC and a much-loved 2008 iPod Classic 120Gb. I recently updated iTunes to V12.1. I no longer have the 'info' legend in 'settings' and am unable now to update my calendar and contacts. Help!

Here is what worked for me:
My usb hub, being usb2, was too fast. I moved the wire to a usb port directory on my pc. That is a usb1 port which is slow enough to run your snyc.

OSB 10gR3 and ODSI 10gR3 for Windows 64-bit

Hi,
I'm looking for Oracle Service Bus 10gR3 and Oracle Data Service Integrator 10gR3 installables for Windows 64-bit. However, I saw the available versions on download section are only for indows 32-bit. I'm using win 64-bit to detect 4BG RAM or more which is not possible in win 32-bit.
Can anybody help me wheather compatable version are available or is there any solution for that?
Thanks in advance,
Ganesh

There doesn't seem to be 64bit version of OSB at all for Windows. [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13196_01/platform/suppconfigs/configs_al10gr3/osb10gr3/overview.html]

PI 7.0/7.1 Installation on Windows 64-bit and MaxDB

Hi Folks,
We have an installed PI in one server on Windows 2003 using Oracle DB (licensed).
We wish to install PI in another server on Windows 2003 64-bit but this time it will be MaxDB.
I've tried searching and found SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1 on Windows_Oracle.pdf.
Any advise please on how to go about installing PI 7.0/7.1 on Windows 64-bit:MaxDB. Thank you!
Regards,
Lex

Hi Lex,
you cannot use the SAP DB (=old name of SAP MaxDB) package you found on the old SAP DB site for your PI installation for various reasons:
a) SAP DB version 7.4 is VERY old, it is no longer supported since the end of 2006 !
b) typically, a SAP application and its DBMS are installed using SAPinst
Try checking the SAP Software Distribution Center (incl. PAM: Product Availability Matrix) on the SAP Support Portal. You can also get the correct software there (when you're an official SAP customer).
Regards,
Roland

I have just purchased my first MacBook Pro and it is pretty fantastic. I own the disks for Microsoft Windows 7 ultimate, and Office 2010 Professional Plus, and need to run them in this Mac. 32 bit discs. Can this happen in boot camp?

I am trying to run Windows and Mac OS on my brand new MacBook Pro. I need to be able to boot to either one. I don't need a lot of hard drive space for the Windows OS. However, the software discs I own for Windows are 32 bit install. Is there a way to run this with what I have? I have the new MacBook 13 in. with retina display. 2.6Ghz i5 with 8GB RAM and 512 GB PCIe Hard drive.

yorkeystyl wrote:
Hi guys! I have a new Macbook Pro purchased from Best Buy yesterday. I had the Geek Squad upgrade the RAM to 8 gigs (They only had PNY brand, I was concerned but went with it anyway). I had them install Boot Camp Windows 7 Ultimate. Today I picked it up and when I started playing with it I learned that they installed the 32 bit version of Win 7 Ultimate instead of the 64 bit version, why, I have NO IDEA.
So, I want to replace the Win 7 installation with the 64 bit version but have read that this can be tricky. What is the proper way to do this? I'm not sure I trust the Geek Squad to do this for me.
I assume I need to reformat the Windows partition, defragment and then install the 64 bit version of Win 7 Ultimate, but am not completely sure. I want to be sure that I do NOT do anything that could affect the Mac side
What do you guys think?
I think you should take it back to the Geeks and tell them what you want, I also think you should backup before you do.
You do not need to reformat or repartition, you need to reinstall Windows from a 64bit copy, 32 & 64 have identical requirements as far as partition and format go, defragmenting has nothing at all to do with your needs.

Limitations of Quicktime files (.mov and h.264) in Windows 64-bit.

It was recently brought to my attention (yes, I'm late to the party) that any file that requires the Apple Quicktime process for playback (decoding) is severely limiting my otherwise powerful system. The Quicktime process is a 32-bit process, which limits your editing functionality to 4GB of RAM—even if you have 32GB or more installed!
I'm starting this new thread because the thread on which this was brought to my attention wasn't directly related to these issues.
A few of my questions: Why do so many cameras create .MOV or .MP4 files that require QuickTime components? 64-bit QuickTime X has aparently been available on the Mac for quite a while, yet I presume they won't allow anyone else to develop a 64-bit codec for Windows, so why hasn't someone sued Apple for monopoly, anti-trust, conflict-of-interest, etc? And most importantly, in a world where DSLRs and off-board ProRes recorders abound, are Windows users really stuck with no option but to transcode the footage before heavy use in Premiere? The Atomos recorders provide the option of using DNxHD, however, if I understand correctly, that codec still requires Quicktime (I've not tested this bit). Is there a matrix available that shows camera / recorded format / requires quicktime / 8- or 10-bit / 4:2:0 or 4:2:2, etc?
To my fellow Windows 64-bit editors, how do you keep your sanity when editing "natively" in Premiere .MOV, .MP4, ProRes or DNxHD with the 4GB RAM limitation? And what camera / off-board recorder do you prefer to avoid both a long transcoding session AND get right to work with native 64-bit codecs?
Thanks in advance!
=== Systems ===
Desktop              |   Laptop
i7-2600K             |   i7-3630qm
GTX460 (1GB)   |   GTX670mx (3GB)
         Windows 7 64-bit
         16GB RAM

strypesinpost wrote:
...Have you read this yet?
http://blogs.adobe.com/VideoRoad/2012/12/premiere-pro-and-quicktime-an d-nikon-oh-my.html
Just now. Yet, it seems to contradict my own findings. The article says: "In the case of Canon DSLR files, there’s something in the file header. Premiere Pro can recognize that the clips came from a Canon camera, and bypass QuickTime. This enables Premiere Pro to have smooth playback of DSLR files..."
The test I conducted was between files from a Canon 7D in their original format vs. an AVI file I transcoded from those originals using GoPro Studio (formerly Cineform). I load up a project and timeline with the original 7D files and then scrub the heck out of the timeline, back and forth. I have Task Manager open in order to monitor my RAM usage. I simply could not get past roughly 4GB. Once I deleted all the original .MOV files from the project, retaining only the transcoded .AVIs, the project cut like butter. The harder I scrubbed the timeline, the higher my RAM usage soared until it gradually, and gracefully came close to maxing out. Lol. Is there a better test I should run?
The other test I ran was a project where I took a single talking head clip of approximately 5 minutes in length. Nothing too taxing for the hard drive, and something that *should* be easy enough to play completely from RAM, once it played through once or twice. I cut this clip and staggered a few tracks on top of eachother. No effects, no transparency. The cumulative effect was a cuts-only edit, but on the timeline my tracks looked like stairs, etc (perhaps the stairs weren't necessary). The primary goal here was to watch how the system performed with a simple cuts-only project where Peremiere was repeatedly asked to access the same file from random locations in the file.   The .AVI version of this project, again, played flawlessly. The .MOV version played even worse than I was expecting, since cuts-only 7D footage is usually not SO hard on the system (even if it is limited to 4GB RAM). The .MOV project couldn't keep up. Period. As soon as the file needed to "jump back" on itself, the refresh rate became intolerable.
So is the 7D an exception to the rule stated in that article? It definitely seems to be limited to 4GB of RAM! If it isn't, why am I seeing this?
Also, is it possible that the footage from the 7D may not *REQUIRE* Quicktime to decode, but since Quicktime is found on my system, the 7D files default to using it anyway?
I've not tested my GoPro footage so thoroughly, but I believe it's limited in the same way. After a transcode to AVI in GoPro Studio, even 2.7K footage plays slick as a whistle. Not so when I don't transcode.
Further thoughts?

DAC 10.1.3.4.1 Server on Windows (64 bit) and Linux x86 (64 bit)?

Hi Friends,
Please confirm wheteher Oracle Business Intelligence Data Warehouse Administration Console 10.1.3.4.1 Server is supported on
Windows (64 bit) and Linux x86 (64 bit)
Because from edelivery.oracle.com i could see the downloads only for windows and Linux and not specified as 32/64 - bit
so will it mean that the same dump is used for both 32 and 64 bit
1) Oracle Business Intelligence Data Warehouse Administration Console 10.1.3.4.1 for Microsoft Windows (V16377-01)
can the above dump is used for both 32 and 64 bit windows?
2) Oracle Business Intelligence Data Warehouse Administration Console 10.1.3.4.1 for Linux x86 (V16378-01)
can the above dump is used for both 32 and 64 bit Linux?
The reason is because for OBIA 7.9.6.3 configuration both the Informatica Power Centre and DAC Server should co-exist
and i could see seperate installer for 32 and 64 bit for both Windows and Linux whereas i couldn't see it for DAC Server
Please confirm .
Regards,
DB

It is supported on both platforms. With Linux however, if you have any issues you can to install in a windows environment, then copy over the folder structure. Also, you can possibly run into issues running the setup.exe on 64bit windows. When you open the install directory, go to dac/disk1/install and run the executable for win32. win64bit can return an error where it says it cannot create certain temp directories. It is a known java bug you can find in the support website.
Edited by: user12838563 on Jul 13, 2011 11:35 PM

Is there a 32 Bit edition available for windows server 2012 and windows server 2008

Dear All,
Is there a 32 Bit edition available for windows server 2012 and windows server 2008?
Regards,
Ahmed

Hi,
Quote：
All editions of Windows Server 2008 R2 are 64-bit only.
Reference link below(session Supported upgrade paths):
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd379511(v=ws.10).aspx
And based on MS official description about system requirement for Windows Server 2012/2012 R2, we may find out that they only has 64 bit OS.
Best Regards,
Eve Wang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Action list not found error when trying to install Flash 11. I have IE8 and windows 32 bit. What can

action list not found error when trying to install Flash 11. I have IE8 and windows 32 bit. What can I do? Thanks

Hi, Please try to download the installer from the links provided in the following page: http://helpx.adobe.com/content/help/en/flash-player/kb/installation-problems-flash-player- windows.html#main-pars_header
Thanks,
Sunil

HT4407 my MBA is running windows 7 Home, 64 bit but windows is not seeing key hardware, i.e. network&sound. I followed the Apple directions "Installing Windows 7 drivers" and still no joy. Any help would be appreciated.

My MacBookAir is successfully running Windows 7 Home, 64 bit but Windows is not seeing key hardware i.e. network,sound and
camera. I have followed the Apple directions "installing Windows 7 drivers" and Windows is still not seeing hardware. Any Help would
be greatly appreciated.

Yes, I had MBA burn Apple's Window support software to a DVD. In Windows I am getting "Hardware not found" and during another attempt (using windows's update driver) "driver not found".

SAPBobsCOM.dll and windows 64 bits

When i try to connect to sap using di api, i have a exception:
Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {632F4591-AA62-4219-8FB6-22BCF5F62007} failed due to the following error: 80040154
I have a web service on windows 64 bits and I have reinstalled di api

Hello
When you compile your application, you must use x86 type as target CPU. reason: B1 and SDK components are running in 32 bit mode under x64 machines. x64 application cannot communicate x86 applications in .COM components. Your addon is compiled to x64, and the DI API is x86 compiled.
This is the reason why you receice error message,
Also nice, if you give the directirve Win32 = True to the compiler when you build you appliaction.
Regards
János

Windows 32 bit and solaris 64 bit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for