Windows 7 Large View Auto Cache

Hi Guys,
I have a client that uses Windows 7 that has a folder on his network share that contains approx 2000 jpg images. He has set his view to Large View because this way he is presented with a thumbnail image preview of each and every single one of his image,
which is handy because this way he does not have to open each file to view it's contents.
Problem is that in order for the thumbnail preview to appear for each image, he has to continuously scroll vertically page by page and waits for each image preview to load but it's done everything is Ok
Issue is that every time he restarts his PC he has to go through the above process of continuously scrolling vertically page by page to load each thumbnail image preview, which is extremely painful for him considering he has 2000+ images in his network
shared folder.
My question is, once all the image preview are loaded doesn't Windows 7 cache all those thumbnail image views so that way the user doesn't have to go through the process of loading each thumbnail image preview every time they restart their PC?
I've seen a few reports out on the Internet stating that this is a known issue for Windows 7
Is anyone able to help?
Regards,
Steven

Hi,
I will move this question to Windows 7 IT Pro forums since it is more related to it:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?category=w7itpro
The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us. Thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
Melon Chen
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

How to keep alignment in Windows LARGE and SMALL fonts

For years, I fought with LabVIEW, trying to keep things looking decent in both Windows LARGE and SMALL font sizes.
By this, I mean Settings - Control Panels - Display - Settings - Advanced - General - Font Size
I love to use large fonts - I run my display at 1600x1200 and it just looks better.
But if you plop an indicator on a panel in LARGE fonts, save it, then open it with SMALL fonts in effect, it looks horrible.
N.I. Doesn't care about this - just look at how ugly their own examples get when viewed in LARGE fonts.
So I developed a method to make the bottom of the label text line up with the bottom of the numerical text, whether in LARGE fonts or SMALL.
Click here for examples. Basically, I turn OFF the SIZE to TEXT attribute and right-justify the label (if on the left of the numeric).
This works OK, except I have just discovered that it depends on the text being the default size.
If I have a 17-pt numeric with a 17-point label, then they both appear as 13-pt when I switch to SMALL fonts - great -- they're still aligned.
But if I have a 17-point numeric with a 16-pt label, when I switch to SMALL, the numeric shrinks to 13, but the label stays at 16, and is thus vertically misaligned with the numeric.
So how can I have a 17-pt numeric with a 13-pt label, and have them BOTH shrink when I switch to SMALL fonts?
I suppose I could use property nodes, and detect the switch myself, but I have 50+ of these on a single VI to do - that would be ugly to watch the labels jumping around.
I suppose I could have two VIs - one for LARGE fonts and one for SMALL, but I don't want to duplicate th
e code.
Any other ideas?
Steve Bird
Culverson Software - Elegant software that is a pleasure to use.
Culverson.com
Blog for (mostly LabVIEW) programmers: Tips And Tricks

It is true that we don't have a
solution. It isn't that we don't care, but the solution choices stink.
Well, I'll stand by my opinion that N.I. doesn't care - when using the default app font, there *-IS-* a solution - the link in my original post points to a page that I show my employees on how to solve the problem. It is solvable, for the case of using the default font and size. Yet N.I. uses the default font and size, but LOOK HOW THEIR EXAMPLES APPEAR (see attached files). This is how the example software looks, out of the box. These are not ancient examples, either.
It is NOT my opinion that, because there apparently is no solution for non-standard sizes, the stuff looking ugly is NI's fault.
But when a solution DOES exist for standard sizes, why they don't apply it is beyond me. Even some of the LabVIEW dialogs suffer from this.
Steve Bird
Culverson Software - Elegant software that is a pleasure to use.
Culverson.com
Blog for (mostly LabVIEW) programmers: Tips And Tricks
Attachments:
ChartsPict.png ‏22 KB
MenusPict.png ‏15 KB
GraphPicts.png ‏31 KB

Images too bright in PSE, good in Windows Picture Viewer.

Hi:
My question is this, I shot some pictures of my son last weekend, in studio,
with a Nikon D2X camera, and a softbox lightbank mounted on a Balcar
flash head. I set the camera to RAW-JPEG Fine, ISO 100, and used a
Minolta flashmeter to measure the light from the strobe. The reading was
f/8 and 2/3. The images look good in the LCD camera display, but when
I see them in my PC display, they look way too bright in Photoshop Elements 7.0,
but they look fine in the Windows XP SP3 Picture Viewer.
Why is this?. If I adjust the contrast and brightness in PSE, then they look too dark
when I check them in Windows Picture Viewer...
Also, the highlights look a little burned out in both, PSE and Windows Picture Viewer,
but the problem looks more evident in PSE. This happens often when I shoot pictures
using strobe lights.
Can you help me with this two problems?.
I have attached one of the pictures so you can take a look at it.
Thanks.

As to why the photo looks different in PSE than in Windows Picture And Fax Viewer, there are two possibilities:
1. Your display may have a color profile associated with it, either because you calibrated it with a calibrator or a profile was installed by the disk that came with your display. PSE is "color managed" and will adjust the colors of a photo based on the display's color profile, whereas Windows Picture And Fax Viewer will not. If you want fine control over accurate display of colors on your display, you'll need to calibrate it if you haven't already, and you should then only use color-managed programs like PSE to view your photos.
2. The photo you posted indicates that you've set your camera to use the Adobe RGB color space for JPEGs. The Organizer has a bug and doesn't display the thumbnails (even large thumbnails) of such photos correctly. The Organizer's Display > Full Screen (F11) and the Editor do display such photos correctly. I'm not sure if this particular photo will trigger the bug, because of the way Nikon in particular stores color profiles in JPEGs. You could see if you're getting hit by this bug by:
a. Open the photo in the Editor.
b. In the Organizer, make the photo's thumbnail as large as possible (not Full Screen view).
c. Adjust the zoom of the photo in th Editor to be about as large as the one in the Organizer.
d. Use Ctrl Tab to switch quickly between the two. If you see differences, you're encountering the bug.

Windows picture viewer fails Acrobat TIF to PDF conversion

Hi. I have some users running Acrobat Pro 9 in batch mode to convert TIF to PDF and run OCRing tasks. Some multi-page TIFs with large color pictures do not convert correctly, and some pieces are missing. We think that Acrobat uses the default picture viewer as the imaging enging or whatever. We have tried opening the images that fail to convert, using the Windows picture viewer, and the viewer fails to display all of the color image - so this does not appear to be an Acrobat problem, but a viewer problem.
Is this a known problem; is there a workaround? Otherwise can someone recommend an alternate image/TIF viewer that will work better for this process?
THANKS!

Have you tried changing the program that opens tif files by default to something else (like Photoshop or Paint) and rebooting?

DPI and image quality in programs like Windows Photo Viewer

I'll keep this as short as possible. About 6 years ago I bought a Panasonic Lumix DMC-F28 digital camera (not DSLR). It claims 10 MP. After that my daughter bought a Canon Rebel (don;t know the model) which has 12 MP. I would compare her pics with mine by looking at them in Windows Photo Viewer. Hers always looked a lot fuzzier than mine. Especially true if you zoomed in. And I gave her a hard time, saying she had bought a knock off.
I just purcahsed a Rebel T5i with the usual kit 18/55 lens. I took a picture with both the new and the old camera. Guess what? Given the same subject with the same lighting, the Panasonic still produces much clearer pictures in Windows Photo Viewer than the Canon. The only difference I see is that the Canon states the DPI as 72 and the Panasonic as 180. OF course, the Canon image has a lot more pixels.
I know that DPI matters only when a picture is printed. But is it possible that the DPI property in the image file is telling Windows Photo Viewer how to present the image? I hope so. Otherwise I lucked out with my Panasonic and got the best camera in the world, or a Canon is not so great after all.
Do I need to apologize to my daughter? See attached images.
These images are opened in MS Paint and cropped to bring out the eye and hair detail.
Panasonic Image
Canon Image

You comparison method is seriously flawed. For 1 image to be at 72 DPI (a software supplied setting) & the other to be at 180 DPI it means that one image has been enlarged (180 divided by 72) 2.5 times more than the other to view it on screen. Zoom in on the good image until it's 2.5 times larger & see how it looks.
Next thing you need to know is that camera technique becomes more important as pixel count increases. an 18 Mpixel image will have an 80% increase in softness over the 10 Mpixel camera from identical camera shake. To make any accurate form of comparison you will need to eleminate the possibility of introducing camera shake into the test. You will also need very similar lighting & the subject must also be stationary for all test shots. (IE that eye (or the person it's attached to) may have moved during one shot but not the othern
"A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought."

Uninstalling PS Album 2.0 removed windows thumbnail viewer

After uninstalling using control panel "add/remove" Now unable to view jpeg thumbnails in "My Pictures". Windows picture and fax viewer no longer in the drop down list of options to view pictures.
Anyone know how to re-install/ re-activate windows picture and fax viewer?
Is this a known bug with Album?
Thanks
John
PS: It was on a HP Pavillion A450, XP (auto updated)

Jim,
Thank you, I thought about this and tried searching for it at Microsoft.com and came up empty. I think the thumnail viewer might be an integral part of windows and that during the uninstall it removed a DLL somewhere. Anyone know if it possible or where to download and re-install windows picture viewer?
Thanks for the advise
John

Unable to open mysite user photos in Windows explorer view

Hi,
We have around 30000 photos in user profile photo library.When we try to open the library in windows explorer view it doesnt open and throws the following error.
\\servrer\DavWWWRoot\m\User
Photos\Profile Picture is not accessible.You might not have permission to use this network resources.contact the administrator of this server to find uot if you have access permissions
I am checking this with farm admi
If we open some other library in the same machine with less items then i was able to open it.
Is there a limit for windows explorer view?
Thanks,
Sudan

Hi Sudan,
Did this happen to all users PC clients?
You can try creating a new following register key with value 30000000 on your client PC, then restart the WebClients service and check results again, please see the following similar article about opening library with large documents in explorer view.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\WebClient\Parameters\FileAttributesLimitInBytes
http://blog.davidjwise.com/2012/06/04/explorer-view-versus-the-large-document-library/
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912152
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

Override Auto Cache Management

Not really a problem, as such.. but something that is a little annoying.
The Override Auto Cache Management option doesn't seem to work properly, unless what is happening SHOULD be happening?
Basically, by default it is set to 75Mb.. I'll set it to around 350-400Mb. However, at random intervals, Firefox will default the settings back to 75Mb, out of the blue. No warning or anything.
Why does is keep defaulting back to 75Mb? I have also changed the option using About:Config with the 'browser.cache.disk.capacity' option. but it still defaults back to 75Mb.
Is there anything I could be doing wrong? Another setting that needs to be changed? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks.

The cache size usually ends up around 350 MB, unless you have very little free disk space. I suggest you start over:
# Type ''about:config'' into the address bar and press Enter.
# Press the big button to bypass the warning.
# In the search box, type ''browser.cache.''
# In the search results, right-click each entry with the status "user set" and choose '''Reset'''.
# Type ''about:cache'' into the address bar and press Enter. Under the "Disk cache device" category, note the value of the '''Cache Directory'''. Open that folder in Windows Explorer.
# Exit Firefox (click the Firefox button in the top left corner, then choose Exit).
# Delete the cache folder you opened earlier.
# Restart Firefox.
At that point, your cache size should be set to something more sensible. Note that under [[Advanced settings for accessibility, browsing, system defaults, network, updates, and encryption|Options - Advanced - Network]], the number box shows the maximum cache size, while the text above it shows how much is currently stored.<br>
If you still need to override the automatic size, then normally all you need to do is check "Override automatic cache management", specify a custom size below, then click the OK button.<br>
Doing so would save the first preference as ''browser.cache.disk.smart_size.enabled'' with a value of '''false''', and the second as ''browser.cache.disk.capacity'' with a value in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibibyte kibibytes]. To avoid unintended effects, it's best to avoid modifying about:config preferences (at least in this case).
If your preferences are lost after restarting Firefox, see the following article:
* [[How to fix preferences that won't save]]

Problem intel HD 4400 monitor 13 inches - defect of the resolution on "windows photo viewer"

Hello to all the community!
I have a Lenovo yoga pro2.
model: 20266
(i74510U - 2ghz - RAM 8gb - Windows 8.1 - total memory available 1792 Mb - resolution monitor recommended 3200x1800).
When I open the same image with "windows photo viewer" for example on the 15-inch monitor the result is ok (Windows7)
Click here to view image.
whereas on the my Lenovo from the 13-inch monitor the visualization is very small. On my Lenovo the menu buttons of "windows photo viewer" are also very small from see (see rectangles highlighted in red)
Click here to view image.
I tried to change all the settings the user side at my disposal, but the problem persists.
Same thing on the graphics program PAINT.NET. All the menu bars, commands, icons, etc, are displayed very small.
You need to make some changes advanced on the card 4400?
Can you help me?
Thanks
Mod's Edit: Image(s) converted to link(s) due to size. Photos are limited to 100k size per forum guidelines.
Please refer to About Posting Pictures for more information.

This is unfortunately often an expected behavior for an High-DPI display like the Yoga 2 Pro has (using the same machine btw.). Because the Display on the Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro has far more pixels on the same area, each pixel is a lot smaller as on other displays. So a control element with 200x200 Pixels looks a lot smaller than on another screen with a lower resolution. The apps have to take this in account, so that they render those elements with more pixels on a High-DPI screen like the one the Yoga 2 Pro uses. If so they are described as dpi-aware. I don't know if the Photo Viewer in Windows 8 is dpi-aware or not and I cannot test this as my machine is already running Windows 10. But as for paint.net I know this one is perfectly dpi-aware and should look just fine. I have it installed myself on this Yoga 2 Pro and it looks just fine to me. This scaling that dpi-aware Apps and windows elements do can be adjusted in the Control Panel. How you do that is described HERE with Option 1 and the steps 1-5 (skip the other steps and especially option 2). Just move the slider shown in step 5 to "larger". You have to log out and in or restart the machine to let the new setting take effect.

Report RDLC print deployment influenced by "Make text and others items window larger or smaller" is that behaviors right?

I have my PC at the window "Make text and others items window larger or smaller" set at the 150%.
How great was my surprise when I found that this setting of my PC broke my RDLC report print deployment.
Do you now about this mistakes?
Is that behavior of "Windows 8" right?
Or is that behavior of "vs 2013" right?

Hello,
Since this issue is mainly related to visual studio report, I am moving this thread to
Other Forums > Visual Studio Report Controls
forum to get help.
And IMO I would agree with you that it should be the right behavior, since it could affect the other printing tasks.
Regards,
Carl
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

When I login to Horizon View, it shows me the list of desktops to connect to. If I'm entitled to only one desktop then can View auto connect me to that desktop instead of me clicking on Connect?

When I login to Horizon View, it shows me the list of desktops to connect to. If I'm entitled to only one desktop then can View auto connect me to that desktop instead of me clicking on Connect.

Yes you certainly can.
Right click any desktop in the list > Settings > in the left pane select the desktop you want to auto connect to > check "Auto connect to this desktop".

Crystal Report Windows Forms Viewer Error in 1 Workstation after upgrade of PL

Hi all,
We just upgraded SAP from 8.82 PL02 to 8.82 PL15.
Afterwards, in just 1 workstation, Crystal Reports layouts have Crystal Report Windows Forms Viewer error I attach.
Before the upgrade this error did not happen.
No permissions or authorizations were changed in the workstation.
The Crystal Reports layouts remain working fine in server and in the other workstations.
In the workstation following are installed:
- Operating System Windows 7;
- Microsoft .NET Framework 4.5;
- SAP Crystal Reports runtime engine for. NET Framework;
- Crystal Report 2008 Runtime SP6;
- Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 Native Client.
All, but the operating system, are equal to the other workstations.
User has edit access to SAP folders, temp and access to the attach path.
We already uninstalled SAP client and client agent and re-installed it but with no avail.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Pedro Mariano

Hi San Xu,
Thank you for your input.
However I'm facing problem with each software is suitable.
I installed SAP Crystal Reports for SAP Business One (CR 2011 V14.0.4.738), but with no avail.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Pedro Mariano

Using numbers 2.3 how do i split windows to view more than 1 spreadsheet at a time?

using numbers 2.3 how do i split windows to view more than 1 spreadsheet at a time?

Hi seth,
Numbers vocabulary:
Spreadsheets (aka: Document)
contain one or more Sheets
on each of which may be placed one or more Tables
each of which contains one or more cells
each of which may contain either data or a formula.
Spreadsheets open in separate windows. Depending on the contents of each spreadsheet, and the scale at which you want to see it (and the size of your display), you can view more than one spreadsheet in the same manner as you can view more than one of any kind of document—open two documents in separate windows. Resize the windows to allow both to be viewed at the same time. Place and scale the individual documents to permit viewing the desired part of each
Sheets within the same document cannot be displayed simultaneously. You can make and open a copy of the document, then open and view both copies as described above, but this introduces new opportunities to edit the wrong copy. You could Copy a Table from one part of the document, open Preview and go File > New from Clipboard to create a PDF copy of that table (readable, but not editable), and view the spreadsheet and pdf documents as described above.
Tables can be rearranged, or have rows or columns (or both) hidden to permit simultaneous viewing of selected parts of both.
A Table can have Table > Freeze Header Rows and Table > Freeze Header Columns set to keep these rows/columns visible as the rest of the table is scrolled. Or can have a range of rows (or columns) hidden to allow viewing of rows (columns) adjacent to that range visible on the same screen.
Numbers does not support freezing of rows or columns other than Header rows and Header Columns.
Regards,
Barry

Can't open a link in a web page, goes immediately to down load and then when opened it shows downloaded to windows photo viewer, which won't open

I open a web page, in the web page there is a link to open another link. I click on this link and the doc is 'downloaded' automatically , I click on the 'green arrow' download button at top of screen, the page opens and says 'windows photo viewer can't open the picture because photo viewer doesn't support this file format or you don't have the latest update to photo viewer'!! I just want to open the link. Grateful for advice.

Where is that happening? Please provide the URL.

Can you tell me how I can ask for help with the following Indesign question: I am a new Indesign user and a Creative Cloud member. I was using the Window/Pages drop down window to view my pages alphabetically or by page number and also to determine whet

I am a new Indesign user and a Creative Cloud member. I was using the Window/Pages drop down window to view my pages alphabetically or by page number and also to determine whether or not my JPEG files were sufficiently HI-Res for the printer. I don't know how I did it but somehow the window has changed so that now it does not have the alphabetical/numerical/Hi-Res information. It just shows the pages in a two page spread in numerical order. How can I restore the window so that I will be able to view the information as I did previously.
Your help will be appreciated,
Don Unwin
[Personal Information Removed]

The pages panel is not the place where you see this information. You can customize the Links panel to show all sorts of things, including the page number, effective and actual ppi, and whether the link is OK or needs updating.

Windows 7 Large View Auto Cache

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for