Windows 8.1 first boot time too long

After Sysprep, windows 8.1 tooks long time to boot, is it normal?
N.A.Malik

Hi,
Generally, when you sysprep an image and deploy it to other devices, it would prepare the device settings, registry update and other computer configuration. This phase would take some time. We call it as specialize and OOBE pass.
Here we have a metric to assess the first boot time, you can take a look at this guide:
First Boot Performance
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/jj130825.aspx
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Macbook boot time too long

    Hello, boot time on my MacBook seems to be very long. Can you please take a look at my bootchart and tell me what do you think?
    And also the gnome login is very slow. More precisely, it takes too much time for the desktop to appear after logging in.
    Here is the bootchart:
    http://i49.tinypic.com/5yrk11.png
    Last edited by exapplegeek (2012-07-08 22:00:21)

    exapplegeek, your thread title is far too general. Please rephrase it such like: "Macbook boot time problem" as soon as possible.
    And leave the "[BOOTCHART]" part out.

  • Average processing time too long in workload monitoring (ST03N)

    Hi expert,
    I wander why average processing time too long in workload monitoring (ST03N)
    for example
    avg.response time : 4700 (ms)
    avg.processing time : 4200 (ms)
    avg.CPU time : 300 (ms)
    avg.DB time : 200(ms)
    OS (CPU and memory ) status is nomal.
    please tell me why processing time too long and what do I check more.
    thanks

    Hi
    Processing Time is the total time taken i.e. Time when user clicks on submit button to send data to SAP System till the time SAP System processes everything and shows the updated screen back to the user. It includes Network Time also.
    Average Processing Time is the Processing Time per Dialog Step
    In ST03N workload Monitor, there are different Task Type like Dialog, Background, RFC, Update,..........
    Could you be more specific where do you find the Average Processing Time high ? I mean for which Task Type.
    If you have users complaining for Performance problem check their Network Time also.
    Let us know, if this information was helpful to you.
    with regards,
    Parin Hariyani

  • First startup after PC boot takes too long / too slow

    Hello there.
    I've been experiencing this problem for about a year now but never actually thought it was a problem until I saw how fast FF can really start up on another computer.
    Searching this issue on google mostly suggested to delete themes and plugins, emptying cache, etc but it didnt help in my case.
    What I noticed is that when starting firefox for the first time on a recently booted computer it takes far too long to start up - 30-60sec. However exiting firefox and then restarting it is actually as fast as it should be. It is always the first startup that takes really long.
    I am also sure that it does '''not ''' have to do with the fact that I am trying to start firefox while the whole OS is still loading with all its background processes.
    Leaving the OS to load completely and then starting firefox also leads to a slow startup.
    I hope someone can help me with this issue.
    Many thanks!
    Leo
    My OS is Win7 64bit, 4gb RAM, using FF 10.0

    If you opt in for sending data to Firefox, that includes information about start-up times. The developers use that feedback to analyse problems and improve firefox. As you say themes and other software extensions to Firefox may increase startup times. Another thing you may do to speed up the startup is take the option to load tabs later not immediately.
    * use '''Firefox Button -> Options -> | General | -> []Dont load tabs until selected'''
    ** see [[options window - general panel]]
    * for other advice and suggestions read [[Firefox takes a long time to start up]]
    * also see [[How can I help by submitting performance data?]]

  • Satellite A300-1mz boot Vista too long

    Hi all...
    I'm asking for your support for a strange kind of problem that afflicts my *a300-1mz* since first day.
    *The booting of the O.S*.(windows vista home edition) *is too long* for my patience. *Its duration* is more than *2min,30sec*.
    Incredible for a dual core2duo and 4gb ram.
    The screen *"please wait"* stays for most of the time.
    I use always the hibernation function but sometimes I need to reboot and its duration is too long.
    I'm asking you for a solution.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I advise you to check programs and utilities in startup option. You can start this typing in RUN msconfig.
    http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/2996/startrup.jpg
    As I now Tempro utility (Fingerprint utility if available)takes pretty much time as it scans for update
    2. Defragment your drive with any defragmentator like Diskeeper, Raxco Perfect disk, clean the whole system (registry, remove duplicated folders) with program like Winutility, Tuneup

  • T400 boot time takes long time & has issue with restart

    Not sure if any one has already posted this and got replies...
    my T400 has a strange issue. it takes a lot time in pre-boot... a cursor blinks on the top left corner for 5+ minutes and then loads the 'Windows loading...' screen for about another 5 mins and finally shows the windows logon screen.
    Additionaly, when i hit shutdown, i am fine. if i hit restart - i am sitting there for ever. 
    my laptop has 8GB RAM + 256 GB SSD + Windows 7 Ultimate x64.

    Srini,
    I brought your tweet in and started a new thread and then found you already had a forum discussion going, so I'll just apend to your original thread and will leave this since I tweeted the link back to you to let you know we were taking a look.(Apologies) 
    Does this abnormally long startup of your T400 occur when docked or by itself?  On battery or on AC power?   
    Have you checked the boot device order in BIOS?  Make sure HDD is listed first.
    Are there a lot of applications being loaded in the startup folder?
    Have you tried using the MSCONFIG utility (start -> run ->msconfig) and then selected the startup tab to see what programs are being loaded during boot and if you can uncheck some that you don't always need to load?
    This could reduce your boot time.  I believe this, along with some setting tweaks was suggested in a similar T400 slow boot thread here...
    Perhaps other members will have additional suggestions....
    Mark
    ThinkPads: S30, T43, X60t, X1, W700ds, IdeaPad Y710, IdeaCentre: A300, IdeaPad K1
    Mark Hopkins
    Program Manager, Lenovo Social Media (Services)
    twitter @lenovoforums
    English Community   Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español   Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • Y40 Windows 10 post update boot time problem

    Hey Guys, I have a Y40 with 8GB RAM and 2 GB AMD Graphics and I updated my Windows 8 to Windows 10. I encountered the Power error which was dealt with earlier in another thread. I was able to fix it. Thanks. Now, I have another boot up related issue.I used to get 25-30 second boot time with Windows 8. But now, it takes 3 minutes to get to the login screen and another 3 minutes to start doing anything on the desktop. I get the normal lenovo log in screen once I press the power button. Then, the screen becomes black and stays that way for about 2 minutes doing nothing. I get the cursor that can move around and that is it. Even after login, It takes a long time to settle down and let me start working. I checked the startup menu and pushed the startup items to the bare minimum. Is anybody else experiencing the same problems?  If so Is there a way I can fix it?

    I'll add to this by saying I am having similar lengthened boot and login times, but it appears that since resolving the graphics driver issue my boot times have sped up. Login times still take about 30 seconds longer than before. I'm assuming this is a Windows related issue, not a hardware-related issue.  Are you using a fusion drive or just a straight-up hard drive? I'm assuming my laptop is booting/logging in faster now because the fusion service Lenovo provides is learning what should be assigned to flash storage and what should be kept on the HDD. Give it another day or two and see if you notice a speed increase at all.

  • Hp dv7 intel, windows 10 extremely slow boot times and lagging and glicthy

    I did the free upgrade and the boot time was really really slow. once it came up it was really laggy for a little bit too.i figured might of been an issue with the upgrade instead of a clean boot. so i erased and did a clean boot as well and still had the forever boot time with black screen.. i went back to windows 7 and no issues. has anyone else had this issue with the pavalilion dv7? if so what did you do to fix it?

    Hi there  & ,  Thank you for visiting the HP Support Forums and Welcome! This is a great site to get answers and ask questions. I have looked into the issue you are having with the boot time being slow on your Notebook with Windows 10.  I did some research and found a way to make the boot time faster. Although this site is not affiliated with HP, it has some great step by step instructions. The topic is called Fast Startup - Turn On or Off in Windows 10.  Here is a link to the HP Support Assistant if you need it. Just download and run the application and it will help with the software and drivers on your system that need updating for Windows 10. Updated Windows 10 drivers will become available on the HP Drivers and Downloads Page for your product. They will be released as they become available to HP. Please follow these provided troubleshooting steps, re-post and let me know how everything went. Thank you! Have a great day!

  • NI7358 Acceleration time too long

    Hi all,
    First, let me introduces briefly our application for your better understanding before touch the problem.
    We're using NI7358 to control 8 servo motors(Mitsubishi HC-KFS13, 100W, 3000RPM, 131072Counts/Rev) for pick and place. The amplifier is also Mitsubishi one MELSERVO-J2M-P8A. From view of NI7358 all 8 axes are open-loop stepper while amplifier will close-loop control the servo motors. One limitation here is this amplifier only can accept 200KPPS pulse rate input, so we set amplifier internal gear ratio to 4096/125 to achieve its maximum speed.
    GearRatio=(3000rpm*131072count/60)/(200*1000counts/sec)
    Then based on this ratio we can know the resolution of "stepper" in view of NI7358 is 4000RPM. (131072*125/4096)
    Now our problem is:
    The system requires these motors move in short distance(1200steps for NI7358) in the shortest time. So we want to shorten the acceleration/deceleration time as possible as we can. As we test the same application before using Keyence PLC as pulse generator, it can meet our target so we expect NI also can.
    During testing using MAX under 1-D interactive, when I set Velocity=3000rpm, Accel/Decel=20000rps/s, target=1200steps, I can get the best result around 1040rpm(peak velocity) with Accel/Decel time around 50ms. The time is too long for us. If I set increase Accel/Deceleration to its maximum* NI7358 will stop pulse output at all(don't know why but suspect it's because of short distance)
    * Maximum Accel/Deceleration(RPS/s) = Amax X (1/Ts) X (1/Ts) X (1/R) (refer to the description of "flex_load_rpsps")
       for our case: Amax=32counts/sample; Ts=0.25ms; R=4000steps/Rev, result is 128000(RPS/s)
    Questions:
    1. Is Amax=32counts/sample hardware fixed?
    2. Any reason can cause NI7358 stop output pulse when I set maximum acceleration/decelration?
    3. Does NI provide time-based profile instead of velocity one so we can set acceleration/deceleration time directly?
    4. Can I use direct pulse output mode just like a pulse generator instead of current profile output?
    5. Under open-loop mode, if I change PID & acceleration feedforward gain, do these will affect the output pulse performance?
    6. If we change the control circuit from open-loop stepper to close-loop servo system, does it can solve our problem?
    7. How does the trajectory generator produces the count/steps output during the acceleration? I create an excel file(attached below) try to draw out the relationship between the sample, velocity and acceleration, anyone can check for me it's correct or not?
    My formula is here:
    Position2 = Position1 + Velocity2*(Sample2-Sample1)
    Velocity2  = Velocity1 + Acceleration*(Sample2-Sample1)
    All comments are appreciated!
    Attachments:
    Profile Study.xls ‏28 KB

    BO has no controls over VPN or network bamdwith, it takes what OS and DB drivers give it.
    You'll need to identify at which point of the workflow to refresh the report the slowness is occuring.
    You'll need to enable webi tracing and see how long the actual refresh take.
    You'll need to enable network traces to see where in the network the slowdown is occuring.

  • Profile WS run time too long

    My first test run (in dev) of the custom Java PWS against a SQL server database seems to be taking too long. Its seems to be taking appx. 1 second or more per user. This will be a problem when processing around 20,000 users. We can't have a PWS running for 4-6 hours everynight.
    I'd really appreciate any tips to optimize this for faster performance. I am opening DB Connection and running 2 queries for each users and clsoing the statement and connection. Can I do this another way so I open the DB connection(and maybe statement) for the Profile Source only once and release the connection etc. after the whole job is done or in case of errors.
    Please help as this could be a huge bottleneck for us!
    Thanks.
    Vanita
    Staples

    Hi Akash,
    Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately I don't have any signature field to limit the profile sync by. I am currently running the PWs in ToMCAT 4.1.30. We plan to deploy on WAS in dev. I am not sure if there is connection pooling being done by Tomcat in 4.1.30 version. Do you have any information on that? I am doing db connect and 2 property queries in the getuserproperties method.
    1. Would the connection pooling (if done in WAS) make any difference to the run time?
    2. Would opening the connection in initialize() method versus GetUserProperties() make any difference?
    As always, thanks for your help.
    Vanita
    ------- Akash Jain wrote on 3/1/05 1:25 PM -------Hi Vanita,On recent hardware, you should be able to perform an initial profile sync at at a rate of ~10/second. This means you should be able to perform your 20k users profile sync in under an hour. Resyncs should be much faster if you use a signature attribute.
    I'm going to assume you're hitting some database backend with a table structure like the following:Users Table String UserGUID Date LastModified
    Properties Table int PropID String UserGUID String PropValue
    You have your users keyed off a unique name - a GUID in this example - and properties in a seperate table keyed off PropID and GUID.
    Lets review the protocol and each step:a) initialize() - sends the parameters of the profile sync to the PWS, this is a good place to do a single query to your database in order to cache all user unique names and signatures (LastModified dates) in a HashTable. This will make re-syncs much faster since subsequent AttachToUser() and GetUserSignature() calls will be derived from this HashTable.b) attachToUser() - in this call you can simply lookup your user record against the HashTable created in Initialize(). If no entry is returned, then throw a NoSuchUserException. If a user does exist continue.c) getUserSignature() - again use the HashTable created in Initialize() to lookup the signature for this user. return it as a String.d) getUserProperties() - if called, this means the signature you sent back in step (c) has changed since the last profile sync. you now want to make a call to your properties table (a single DB call) to load all the property values for the user. return these as a UserPropertyInfo object.
    During an initital sync, you will always get to step (d) above. During re-syncs, assuming there is low churn, I'd say a max of 1% of your calls will get to step (d) and thus the re-sync should be an order of magnitude faster in most cases.
    With respect to database connections - if you are opening and closing a connection for each user, this is pretty poor with respect to performance. Your best bet in Java is to use a single connection (this is a single threaded process) which is setup in initialize(). In the shutdown() method, close this connection.
    I hope this helps, the combination of using a single connection, using the signature attribute and caching all the users unique names and signatures in one call at the start of the profile sync should drastically increase performance.
    Thanks,Akash

  • Elapsed Timer Too Long?

    Is there a limit to the duration I can input into an elapsed timer VI? In my program the user can specify a duration of up to 24 hrs. My program is supposed to hold current conditions for the specified durations. When the user sets it 1, 2, 3 or four hours it holds the current conditions fine. When they set it to 24 hours the current conditions are not held for 24 hours. Is this too long of a duration for this VI (86,400 seconds)?
    thanks.

    rchaoua wrote:
    The question regarding maximum duration a elapsed time VI has still not been answered.
    You can convert the "elapsed time" express VI to a plain VI by "right-click...open front panel" and inspect the code yourself. There are no secrets! You can see that it converts the timestamp to DBL and operates on the lower precision DBL values. This should be sufficient for much more than 24 hours, so something else is wrong in your case.
    Can you attach an example that shows the incorrect behavior (=premature elapsation?).
    rchaoua wrote:
    But I have another question; Can you have multiple elapsed time VI in a single piece of code and not have it affect the other elapsed VIs?  I have three elapsed timers in my code (in different panels) and get the sneaking supsicion that they are not behaving nicely with each other. But I am not sure. I was hoping someone has expereince with this scenario and could shed some light.
    The crucial subVIs are reentrant and thus there should be no interaction between multiple instances of the "elapsed time" express VI. Each will keep it's own state. Why do you suspect that they interact?
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Download time too long

    Why is it taking too long to download a song?  Im talking HOURS if it even happens!

    Could you download the graphics dynamically as they are required?
    So, the air app would be the master 'app' and those additional 
    graphics are loaded from your server only when required? I'd bet this 
    would be the way you'd build it if the app were purely based online 
    and not via air?
    Dave Cates
    Managing Director
    Redemption Media Ltd
    www.redemptionmedia.co.uk
    Interactive internet, media & communications solutions.
    Sent from my iPhone

  • In boot camp assistance download the latest windows support from apple is taking too long

    I am trying to download the latest windows support software from apple in Boot Camp Assistance and is taking for ever. Any suggestions?

    In this threadhttps://discussions.apple.com/message/16605226#16605226there's a link to download the BootCamp 4.0 Driver package.

  • Sign-in time too long (Win 8.1)

    Two days ago I received quite a strong new Win 8.1 computer (with SATA drive).
    I have opted for a LOCAL user only without a password.
    The boot process was extremely fast: the computer turns-on to the blue log-in screen in few seconds; and then pressing Enter the signing-in process was almost immediate.
    Then, a bad thing happened: I was lured by Microsoft to sign-in with a Microsoft account.
    Then, signing-in to my computer with this MS account (and password) took ages; I mean, something like a full one minute the computer was trying to sign-in until eventually succeeding.
    Understanding my mistake (why would I want an MS account?) I decided to disconnect from my Microsoft account, and return back to my nice local user.
    But now, the long waiting time to signing-in (even without a password, and with an automatic log-in) still remains: I wait like 25 sec when the blue screen and the white dot circulate repeatedly until my account is signed-in.
    What is going on?
    Help me!

    Hi,
    Did you mean after switch to local user account, it still took long time to sign in?
    Firstly please disable unnecessary startup program:
    1. Open Task manager;
    2. Jump to Startup tab, right click to disable the unnecessary applications one by one.
    If the issue still persists, refresh your computer for test:
    How to refresh, reset, or restore your PC
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-IN/windows-8/restore-refresh-reset-pc
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Email loading times too long (Gmail, E75)

    Hi dudes, and thanks for reading.
    Email provider: Gmail
    Phone: E75
    Phone firmware: 202.12.01 (the newest)
    I'm getting pretty long waiting times when my phone loads my emails.
    I have set up an account to the phone's email application. It lists the emails in real time, but when I try to open an one, the loading time gets overwhelming.
    It is not a pleasure to use the email application.
    Can I do anything for this? Another app?
    Any help wuold be appreciated!!!

    Multiple reasons too hard to guess.
    First step of ts - reset network settings

Maybe you are looking for