Windows 8 64bit not compatible w/ AMD Athlon 64 processor and/or ASUS A8N-SLI motherboard.

Why should I have to go through a plethora of troubleshooting techniques, then have to settle for using the Windows 8/ 32bit install CD, when I have a 64bit system? I think it's probably something in the Windows
8 /64bit code that causes it to fail install w/ AMD Athlon 64bit processor, and/or my ASUS A8N-SLI motherboard. After a lot of hassle I tried the Windows 8 /32bit CD and that seems to work fine. My real question is, why should I have to settle
for 32bit on a 64bit system?

I had the same experience trying to install Window 8 Pro 64bit (Build 9200) on an old XP SP3 32bit system, but I somehow got it working; the full story.
I had two XP Sp3 32 bit systems I wanted to upgrade to Window 8 Pro 64 bit (with the $40 upgrade deal available now). System#1 is: I7 920/Asus P6T deluxe/EVGA 560Ti/3GB/1 TB SATA 300 drive/1.44 Floppy/ 12X Bluray burner (pulled the old TV tuner card for
upgrade-incompatible). I ran the Windows 8 upgrade advisor - very few issues (TV Tuner card as mentioned and other software) - bought the upgrade. Downloaded the upgrade from my Win7Pro 64bit system to obtain the 64bit ISO (2.69GB) - burned to DVD. Installed
from DVD; no problems, finished in under 20 minutes - working great (really fast boot!).
System#2 is: Opteron 180/Asus A8N-E/EVGA 275GTX/2GB/1 TB SATA 300 drive/ 1.44 Floppy/ 16X DVD RW burner; the Windows 8 upgrade advisor - more incompatible software than system#1, but no incompatible hardware. I had read a number of blogs concerning the issues
others were having with the upgrade failing, so before I purchased, I thought I would run the 64bit install DVD I had (known to work on the other system) to see if it worked. I should note this system was not-in-use and thus I was not worried if the install
failed (I'd just be annoyed!). Ran the install from the DVD; initial splash screen - no spinning dots - waited 15 minutes (by which time no activity on DVD or hard drive) - failure. Rebooted - entered bios (1010) - tried many combinations of settings up to
disabling nearly everything (NVRAID, Legacy USB, Floppy, Audio97- all disabled / moved SATA into every slot (1-4) / tried SATA 150 and SATA 300 (SATA2, slots 3-4) - no change - failure X4 attempts. Now original XP3 installation is corrupted (GRRRR!) - I should
have imaged the drive BEFORE - oh well. Read more about others experience with this seemingly NForce board-related issue. Plan B - I will try install with an IDE (PATA) hard drive (80GB) - failure. Read more - some mention Window 8 installer not "liking" XP
partitions / disks (???); Plan C - Re-partition / format / check 80 GB IDE drive with WDTools - attempted Win8Pro install - failure. Dejected; last attempt before considering Win8Pro 32bit - Plan D - Re-partition / format / check 1 TB SATA 300 drive with SeaTools
(Barracuda 32GB buffer-7200rpm) - run Win8PRO 64bit install from DVD (build 9200) - success! Install took nearly an hour, with 3 reboots to the finish. Specifics (install configuration): 1 TB SATA drive in Slot 4 (SATA2), upgraded memory to 4GB Corsair PC3200
(4 slots filled), Two DVD drives on Primary IDE channel (master and slave), secondary IDE channel - no devices, bios (1010) - NVRAID, Audio97,1394 port,LAN -disabled; USB 2.0, USB Legacy, Floppy - enabled, IDE-Auto), TrendNet USB wireless adapter on USB slot
2 (motherboard), EVGA 275GTX in PCIe slot 1, no other cards. System seems to be performing well (fast boot times, no hangs), but as noted, no sound (I actually forgot to re-enable the Audio97 device in bios; it was 2am). I will see if I can get the Audio97
enabled today; my backup is to add a Turtle Beach Montego DDL PCI card (with the Windows7 64bit driver and run in compatiblity mode). Hope this saga might help some others out - good luck.

Similar Messages

OCI 9.0.1 and AMD Athlon Processor

Hello,
I have a client who is using an Oracle 8.1.7 server and is connecting from workstations running OCI 9.0.1 (the 9i R1 client). This is working fine except for on one workstation. The only known difference with this machine is that it is using an AMD Athlon processor (all the others are Intel processors).
The behavior appears to be that for floating point numbers, Oracle/OCI is telling our product that the numbers are integer numbers (no decimals). Thus, my application is not displaying the decimal places (since it is being told there are none).
All other workstations work fine.
Any ideas? I am wondering if there is a known issue with the AMD Athlon processor and the oracle 9.0.1 client...? I am attempting to convince the user to try the 9.0.2 client, but I don't want to waste his time.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Rob

Thanks Adrian.
I'll try to get him to run a straight select, but I don't even know if they installed SQL-Plus on the machine. He hasn't exactly been cooperative (I've asked him to check other areas of my application and he doesn't) so I don't know what he will do.
As for the sqlnet.ora file, I am not sure what to look for in there...? or do you suggest blowing it away and starting over?
Thanks again,
Rob

Very slow performance AMD athlon processor

Hi,
I'm working on Windows 2000 environment with an AMD athlon +3000 processor, and 1.5GB RAM.
I just installed VMware 5.0 and Linux AS 3. As soon as I rebooted the virtual machine and after having installed Linux, the guest OS (Linux) performance is very very poor.
Do you have any suggestion about how to solve this issue?
Thanks
Gilson Sirvas

Where does the Oracle software come into the picture? If this is a generic vmware issue please post on VMware's community forums..
http://www.vmware.com/community/
that will be much more effective.
In general defragmenting the HD is very helpful, also allocating more memory to the Guest OS will make things run faster. look in the vmware.log make sure IO is not taking too long, look for things like:
Jun 12 04:24:11: vmx| SCSI0:0: Command WRITE(10) took 7.347 seconds (ok)
that means that a single IO took 7 seconds, that's very very slow.. move the VM to a faster (internal) HD.. Finally check with vmware, there might be an issue with the AMD processor, not sure...
If you figure it out and the solution is interesting, please take the time and post here so that others can benefit.
good luck,
Saar.

I am lookinat buying an Aspire Netbook with 4 gig ram, dual core amd c70 processor and windows 8, wi

am looking at buying an Aspire Netbook with 4 gig ram, dual core amd c70 processor and windows 8, will it run my cs5 suite

Mark,
Adobe generally requires a minimum CPU clock speed of 2.0 GHz or higher in order to run CS5 or higher. Unfortunately, the AMD C70 CPU in that netbook operates at only 1.0 GHz, which is far below Adobe's minimum requirement. In addition, even if it did run Premiere Pro CS5, performance will be excruciatingly slow, not only due to the extremely weak CPU, but also due to the complete lack of a discrete GPU with CUDA capability. As such, that system, if it even runs Premiere Pro CS5 at all, would be at least 80 to 100 times slower (in terms of the Relative Performance Index (RPI) in Bill Gehrke's and Hard Millaard's PPBM5 tests) than even a mediocre quad-core desktop PC, let alone a fast overclocked i7 monster PC.

Dreamweaver and AMD Athlon processors

Dreamweaver CS3 load my AMD Athlon 3200+ and AMD Athlon64
3200+ really hard.
Look
here!
Is anybody know about this problem, or it`s only me?

What is your AntiVirus? Is it doing realtime scanning? This
is usually the
cause for such a load.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"Fuffel" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:fe6bkm$anq$[email protected]..
> Dreamweaver CS3 load my AMD Athlon 3200+ and AMD
Athlon64 3200+ really
> hard.
http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/7427/dreamweavercs3hy9.png
> Is anybody know about this problem, or it`s only me?

I downloaded CS6 and am having issues with my print driver. It is not compatible with the HP 2600n and have tried to download drivers given to me by adobe ( (Jupiter 3) but it is not working. after a few days. Its a temporary fix and is still looking for

I downloaded CS6 and am having issues with my print driver. It is not compatible with the HP 2600n and have tried to download drivers given to me by adobe ( (Jupiter 3) but it is not working. after a few days. Its a temporary fix and is still looking for the HP driver when i boot up. It also will not save in any print or postscript format. Does anyone know how to fix?
Currently use a Mac with the latest Mavericks 10.9.4

Oh boy! Acting kind of weird seems to be an understatement, aquaequus!
What type of troubleshooting were we able to do with you? I want to make sure that we can get some sort of resolution for this problem.
It is quite possible the battery door may get your phone in working order again. I'm not sure if the store has it in stock, but it is available in our warehouse for $14.99 which can be ordered via customer service.
Tamara H.
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

I updated my itunes to 11 and found out my phone and ipod were not compatible. I uninstalled it and reinstalled 10.7 but now I get an error message when I try to open itunes saying "the file cannot be read because it was created by a newer verison"

I updated my itunes to 11 and found out my phone and ipod were not compatible. I uninstalled it and reinstalled 10.7 but now I get an error message when I try to open itunes saying "the file cannot be read because it was created by a newer verison" What do I do?

Thank you for clarify I'm supposed to read the ENTIRE article. I thought I was just supposed to read the title and magically everything will fix itself. I appreciate you taking the time to help me however I do not appreciate the caps and the way you have addressed the situation. If you are not going to kindly help people/make suggestions just don't try! And for the record my conclusions are not illogical, the iOS7 thing is on the website in small font (which I got by reading the ENTIRE thing) and you should really find a new hobby because your socialization skills need some help! That goes for you too Chris. Not everyone is a tech nerd

CREATIVE Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty compatible w/ ASUS A8N-SLI (Non-Deluxe

Hi, i was about to order a CREATIVE Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatalty FPS and searching google i find that there is problem with motherboard who use nVidia chipset 4, which are on my ASUS A8N-SLI (Non-Deluxe) , no more new Bios update since end of 2005 for this model and anyway?i won't take the risk to flash a Bios, so how to know if my Bios is compatible or not ?I tried to find version of my Bios pressing Del button on boot of my PC, saw lot of stuff but not my Bios version.. Any help please ?Thank's?

I just find a tool who give me all info about my bios?read below: ?Please tell me if i can buy CREATIVE Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatalty and if will be compatible or not?Program:? eSupport.com BIOS Agent Version 3.6
BIOS Date: /30/04
BIOS Type: Phoenix - Award BIOS v6.00PG
BIOS ID:? /30/2004-NF-CK804-A8NSLI-B
OEM Sign-On: ASUS A8N-SLI ACPI BIOS Revision 00
Chipset:? AMD 00 rev 0
Superio:? ITE 872F rev 7 found at port 2Eh
OS:?? WinXP SP
CPU:? AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ 800 Mhz MAX: 3700 Mhz
BIOS ROM In Socket: Yes
BIOS ROM Size:?? 52K
Memory Installed:? 2048 MB
Memory Maximum:? 4096 MB
Memory Slot 0:? 024 MB
Memory Slot 02:? 0 MB
Memory Slot 03:? 024 MB
Memory Slot 04:? 0 MB
ACPI Revision:?? .0

After downloading and creating the MSI for Lightroom, the install fails with no errors reported. Checking compatability, windows comes back with not compatible on both win 7 and 8.1.

Installer MSI fails with no error or message of any kind. Tested compatability with the windows compatability check and it comes back as not compatible. What now?

Hans,
It is a known problem on Windows 98, Windows and Windows 2000 if you are using Intel Pentium 4 processor with Sun JRE and Symantec JIT. I had the same problem with Windows 98. Oracle has a patch. Please see Note:131299.1 on metalink for details.

Safari for Windows is NOT compatible with Unicode 3.1 CJK characters!

This is an "old" problem since Safari for Windows was initially released. In the meantime, the problem is still not fixed in the latest version 4.0.3 (531.9.1).
Not only Safari (for Windows) does not properly show homepages that contain Unicode 3.1 CJK characters, but it also fails to show Unicode 3.1 CJK characters (it shows "squares" instead) in the whole application, such as Search box and all dialog boxes. Will this be fixed in the next release?
By the way, it is strange that Safari 4 for Mac is Unicode 3.1 compatible.

To speak more precisely, the Safari for Windows doesn't support CJK characters of Unicode CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B.
The following test illustrates the incompatibility of Safari for Windows:
1. Sample text displayed in Firefox 3.0.2 on Fedora 9.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3020/3002743180_e026d5c84b.jpg
2. Sample text displayed in Safari 3.x/4.x on Windows XP with "MingLiu Ext-B" (an Ext-B font provided by Microsoft) installed.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/2971019999_1c113109a9.jpg

New update not compatible with my computer processor (PPC)

I have a Mac G4 PPC 1.5GHZ with 1.25G Ram and Mac os 10.5.8
Used to have FireFox installed on my computer until I made the mistake to try to update the program using it's built in software update feature.
All went well until I tried to run Firefox after the install was complete. Up comes the message that the software is not compatible
with my computers architecture.
Now the install has erased my original Firefox and i cant seem to find a version anywhere that will work on a PPC.
Can you assist?

For older Macs that aren't supported in Firefox 4 / 5 / 6, try TenFourFox for PowerPC's running Mac 10.4.11 & 10.5.8 . <br />
http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/ <br />
http://code.google.com/p/tenfourfox/downloads/list
Or use 3.6.20 <br />
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

MSI KT4 ultra and AMD ATHLON 2600+ and Corsair 512Mb 3200

Hello,
i've bought a: MSI KT4 ULTRA and a AMD ATHLON 2600+
Today, i've updated the bios to the version 1.3! So: no problem to reboot after the process complete.
BUT, now i can't set the CPU at 2.16Ghz (280Mhz clock) because if i set the clock up to 100Mhz it doesn't reboot anymore! the motherboard detect the frequency @ 1250 Mhz :(((
Please: HELP ME
(sorry for the grammar and / the english) but i'm a french guy.

Hi,
I had the same issues, see the thread:
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/e_service/forum/viewindex.php?threadid=11717&boardid=13&styleid=1
Essentially I had to set (in the BIOS) the FSB to 166 and left the Multiplier on auto. This ment the processor was reported properly as 2600+, but the memory will only run at 333 MHz... Yeah I think I wasted the money on getting the latest and greatest memory too....
Had me worried for a while, I though my supplier had palmed a bad chip off on me.... It just that the board can't do the highest speed chips and the highest speed memory at the same time (it states that that is unsupported in the manual...)
hope the helps...

TS3694 When trying to update or restore my Iphone I get an error message saying...could not be restored because firmware file is not compatible. What is this and how can it be resolved?

When trying to restore or update my Iphone 4 it errors out with message:..."could not be restored because the firmware file is not compatible." How do I resolve this?

Ask him if he has 'jailbroken' the ipod touch. Some jailbreaking firmware resets it to Ipad firmware and so it is very difficult to restore as itunes simply doesnt recognise it for what it is. It's Apple's solution to try and stop mass jailbreaking.

'not compatible with your current codelines' and 'Patch 7461070'

We are trying to upgrade EBS from 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.1 using Maintenance Wizard v2.15, and we are on "Apply Preinstall Patches" for "Perform the Upgrade". We got some strange errors:
(1). AutoPatch error for "Task: Apply Preinstall Patches":
This patch is not compatible with your current codelines.
This patch is compatible with: entity 'xla' - codeline 'R12.XLA.A'.
Your current on-site codeline for the entity 'xla' is: 'R12.XLA.B'.
for "1-Apply patch 6832389 (Required)", "2-Apply patch 6625757 (Required)", "3-Apply patch 6648785 (Required)", "4-Apply patch 6166150 (Required)", "5-Apply patch 6146757 (Required)", "6-Apply patch 6757123 (Required)", "7-Apply patch 6172183 (Required)", "8-Apply patch 6774040 (Required)", "9-Apply patches 6976563 and 7351384 (Conditionally Required)"
(2). Got patch version mismatch errors when applying patch#7461070 for "10-Apply AD 12.1.1 upgrade driver (Required)":
###############################################################################SUMMARY - patchit12.sh - of patch: 7461070, driver: driver=u7461070.drv###############################################################################patchit12.sh - is exiting with no actions. ie. Patch 7461070 not applied.There is a mismatch between the patch version specified and the releaseversion obtained from your Applications environment. In order to applyRelease 12 patches to previous Applications versions, the patch must be applied in preinstall mode.This can be done by passing the appropriate value to the preinstall parameter of eof_patch12.sh.INFO: Not starting patch alert monitor, to start: Login Engineer, User Admin, Update Profile
For first issue:
Verified first 2 patches:
Patch 6832389:R12.AP.A R12: Critical Pre-upgrade for R12
Patch 6625757 6625757:R12.XLA.A
These patches are for 12.0 upgrade, not for 12.1
Why MW is trying to apply these R12.0 patches?
For second issue I found Note 779466.1 Patch 6604842 fails during a R12 Upgrade via Maintenance
Wizard as DB still reports R11i
similar but at 12.0 level.
Shoul all customers follow the workaround and manually apply the patch?

I got similar error:
ACTION: execute on node: apps, patch=7461070, driver=u7461070.drv
patchit12.sh REMOTE SIZE: 53273 LOCAL SIZE: 53273
OK - no update needed for patchit12.sh, same size as on EOF: 53273 bytes.
Found release REL=11.5.10.2 from fnd_product_groups.
WARNING - patchit12.sh has been invoked on a non-R12 Applications system.
SUMMARY - patchit12.sh - of patch: 7461070, driver: driver=u7461070.drv
patchit12.sh - is exiting with no actions. ie. Patch 7461070 not applied.
There is a mismatch between the patch version specified and the release
version obtained from your Applications environment. In order to apply
Release 12 patches to previous Applications versions, the patch must be
applied in preinstall mode.This can be done by passing the appropriate
value to the preinstall parameter of eof_patch12.sh.
INFO: Not starting patch alert monitor, to start: Login Engineer, User Admin, Update Profile
Should patch 7461070 be applied manually?

After upgrading to 10.0.2 I get "Error:Platform version 9.0.1 not compatible with 10.0.2" and I have to reinstall ver 9

I'm, running WinXP Sp3. I downloaded 10.0.2 and installed it as an upgrade as I have done successfully with all other new versions. It installs, but when it tries to load I get the following error: Platform version '9.0.1' is not compatible with minVersion >= 10.0.2, maxVersion <=10.0.2. I then have to run Win Uninstall, and then reinstall 9.0.1 to be able to get back online.

If you use ZoneAlarm Extreme Security then disable Virtualization and reinstall Firefox.
See:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up#XULRunner_error_after_an_update
*[[/questions/880050]]

Windows 8 64bit not compatible w/ AMD Athlon 64 processor and/or ASUS A8N-SLI motherboard.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for