Windows 8 - Folder Redirection policy missing from GP Results.
Hi guys! This has been giving me a hard time the last day or so. I've got some Win8 machines in our 2003 domain. I've got some GPO's applying with WMI filtering for win8 machines. Mostly these are ok, but i'm having a huge problem with Desktop Folder
Redirection.
After a fresh build and first login, everything works fine. Drive mappings are all there and the Desktop is redirected to to users home drive on the file server. This is being done with Advanced settings using group membership and set to "Create a folder
for each user under the root path" \\dfs1\users. This location is correct and permissions are fine of course as everything works for a while.
After a little while or some unknown event, this redirection stops working.
check these two screengrabs. These are different users on different machines. The machines are identical, are in the same OU and have the same image. The users are different but have the same group memberships and are in the same OU.
This is a working machine. Not the Folder Redirection component was processed and the Policy exists.
This machine is not working. Folder Redirection is processed, but the Policy is missing. Running a gpresult /v on this machine yields:
Folder Redirection
N/A
It was working fine yesterday and this morning. Now at some point a policy refresh stopped it from working. Just trying to figure out what! These are the exact settings currently in place for our win 7 machines which all work just fine. Going a bit crazy
tbh and usually when i post questions i figure it out shortly afterwards anyway huhu. Any help is appreciated!
h
well I though this issue was gone when I switched to a new Task Sequence in SCCM every machine that was built with that was working fine with Folder Redirection happening as it's meant to be. That was for about a week, now it's back to not working.
here's a snippet of the gpsvc.log file pertaining to FD.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOs(User): Processing extension Folder Redirection
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ReadStatus: Read Extension's Previous status successfully.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CompareGPOLists: The lists are the same.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CompareGPOLists: The lists are the same.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 GPLockPolicySection: Sid = S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230, dwTimeout = 30000, dwFlags = 0x0
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::LockPolicySection.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Beginning WaitForSingleObject.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Completed WaitForSingleObject.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CPolicyCriticalSectionCollection: LockPolicySection called for user <S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230>
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 SID = S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 bMachine = 0
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Global Sync Lock Called
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Writer Lock got immediately.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Global Lock taken successfully
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Entering for extension Folder Redirection
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 UserPolicyCallback: Setting status UI to Applying Folder Redirection policy...
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: No changes. CSE will not be passed in the IwbemServices intf ptr
GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGroupPolicySession::QueueItemForPolicyApplication::-- (Status: 997)
GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::UserLogonEvent::-- (Status: 997)
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Extension Folder Redirection returned 0x0.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Extension Folder Redirection status was not updated because there was no changes and no transition or rsop wasn't enabled
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::UnLockPolicySection.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Beginning WaitForSingleObject.
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Completed WaitForSingleObject.
GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 Setting GPsession state = 1
GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 User SID = <S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230>
GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CPolicyCriticalSectionCollection: UnLocked successfully
GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGroupPolicySession::QueueItemForPolicyApplication::++ (bTriggered: 0, bConsole: 1)
GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 PolicyApplicationState is True.
GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 AsyncThreadsProcessing is False.
Similar Messages
-
Folder Redirection policy is not applied to a user, when the server target is changed.
After server target is changed via group policy, when user login (roaming profile)first time, the the new server target has not been applied, instead it's pointing to the old folder redirection path.
But if we reset the windows profile (roaming ), the new folder redirection works, can you please specify a solutions that the new folder redirection works when the user login for the first time. so it reduce the time on resetting users profile.
it seems that we need to delete the old folder redirection path from the user profile (roaming user profile) via group policy or similar solutions..
Many Thanks> But when the specific users login they all get the same error, it
Is the old server removed from the domain? Seems so - or some other
authentication related issue, hard to tell from here...
> seems that the roaming user profiles still keeps the old server details,
Yes - if you change redirection targets, FR moves content from old to
new, and only if this ends sucessfully, it will update the redirection
target.
Make the old redirection target accessible to the user and you'll be fine.
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :)) -
Windows 7 Policy missing from Group Policy Management
Hey all,
I have 2 SBS 2008 clients that have Windows 7 Policy missing from Group Policy Management. I noticed that they have XP, Vista, and 8, but not 7.
I came across this when I started to deploy some new support software. I deployed my package, the XP, Vista, and 8 policies as well as the "Windows SBS Client Policy" and workstation, but Win 7 workstations do not get the software package
and this is at both sites.
I personally have SBS008 have tested this and same issue, XP, Vista, 8, 8.1, even my 10 get the software, but my Windows 7 does not.
Do you have any ideas? I have attached a screenshot so you can see what I am talking about.Hi,
Similar query answered :
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/d6a6e3fa-fb15-4bcc-a5ca-449f69eeee5d/sbs-2008-missing-client-policy-for-windows-7?forum=smallbusinessserver
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=25250
I hope that will help.
Binu Kumar - MCP, MCITP, MCTS , MBA - IT , Director Aarbin Technology Pvt Ltd - Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. -
Microsoft-Windows-Folder Redirection Error 502. CSC database locked by another user
Dear all,
We are finalizing our Windows 7 migration where we migrated 500+ clients. In our enterprise concept we implemented RUP (Roaming User Profiles) and Redirected Folders for all
users. The Redirected Folders have been by enabled by a single GPO which redirects all folders from
AppData to
Searches \\servername.domain.name\documents$\%username%.
Problem:
The RUP and Redirected folders solution works fine until a new user wants to logon. This new user has been migrated to RUP and Redirected on another system and
he just wants to work on another workplace or gets a temporary pc. What happens is that redirected folders do not work. The user gets a message that the folder is not reachable and desktop is empty.
Troubleshooting:
Soon I found out that something was being locked. If we used a user account which had working Redirect Folders than this
worked for that user. An event of 10 was logged in OfflineFiles area of EventViewer to reconnect the path which was configured in the GPO.
This is example screenshot. It says "Error on Open Folder. \\server.domain.name\documents$\%username%\Desktop refers to a location that is unavailable. It could be on a hard disk
on this computer, or a on a network. Check to make sure that the disk is properly inserted, or that you are connected to the Internet or your network, and then try again. If it still cannot be located, the information might have been moved to a different location."
These symptoms happen randomly and not on all workstations. The pain here is when it happens on a portable computer. For desktop we disabled the "Disable Offline Files' in "Manage
Offline Files" control panel and then reboot. After the reboot the folders are directed
and it works without these errors... On portable computer we can't use this work around as they need to work offline.
If I connect to the share without the FQDN like \\servername\documents$\%username%\Desktop than this works fine and user can access all folders. When I try the FQDN path which is
configured in the GPO to redirect user to like \\servername.domain.name\documents$\%username%\Desktop than it fails with this message. I personally think because the C:\Windows\CSC database is locked by the previous user who has been logged on this system.
An example of the event generated in the Applications Event viewer part (I removed some username and server path):
Log Name: Application
Source: Microsoft-Windows-Folder Redirection
Date: 1-2-2011 17:40:11
Event ID: 502
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords:
User: domain\ivan
Computer: computer.domain.name
Description:
Failed to apply policy and redirect folder "Videos" to "\\servername.domain.name\documents$\ivan\Documents\My Videos".
Redirection options=0x1001.
The following error occurred: "Can not create folder "\\\servername.domain.name\documents$\ivan\Documents\My Videos"".
Error details: "Access is denied.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-Folder Redirection" Guid="{7D7B0C39-93F6-4100-BD96-4DDA859652C5}" />
<EventID>502</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>0</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2011-02-01T16:40:11.486983400Z" />
<EventRecordID>2754</EventRecordID>
<Correlation ActivityID="{3211E6FB-2801-456D-BE6E-66AAE150A4DC}" />
<Execution ProcessID="968" ThreadID="5856" />
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>computer.domain.name</Computer>
<Security UserID="S-1-5-21-3705223304-2632712944-1292073641-26755" />
</System>
<EventData Name="EVENT_FDEPLOY_FailedToApplyPolicy">
<Data Name="FromFolder">Videos</Data>
<Data Name="ToFolder">\\servername.domain.name\documents$\ivan\Documents\My Videos</Data>
<Data Name="Options">0x1001</Data>
<Data Name="Error">Can not create folder "\\servername.domain.name\documents$\ivan\Documents\My Videos"</Data>
<Data Name="ErrorDetails">Access is denied.
</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
Something like this I see in the Application Eventviewer:
Environment:
Windows 7 Enterprise client with patches until 1-Nov-2010
Windows Server 2008 R2 for the Documents$ share
Windows Server 2003 R2 as the domain controller
I have tried all different option even to rebuild the CSC database but this also was not helping. I hope we are not dealing with a bug.
Any help is much appreciated.
Best regards, Ivan Versluis http://www.networknet.nlIvan and SteveDIG - Thanks for taking the time to post detailed information about what you have found. I have found the same things over the past few months and have been working with Microsoft to resolve this. Like Ivan, I have been told by
MS that this is a design problem in Windows 7, but they did admit it is a bug and did not charge me for the case. That was the good news. The bad news was that the problem is so 'deep' in Windows 7 that it will not be fixed until Windows 8 and
the CSC engineering team in Redmond has rejected several requests to fix this issue in Windows 7 from several customers. I personally feel we should have hauled our TAM in over this, but that wasn't my call so we haven't attempted to get an attitude
change from MS.
<RANT> I find this completely outrageous. Windows is supposed to be a multi-user operating system suitable for deployment to mobile workforces spread around the world and often using slow VPN links. Offline folders, folder redirection,
slow link detection, etc. are all great on paper and as I did the design work for the W7 solution I've just built I sold these advantages heavily. I now have serious egg on my face and am not happy. Like others here I missed this in testing as
multiple users are a fringe for us, but still important, I unfortunately didn't think to specifically test for multiple users, though I tested the features thoroughly and was happy with the results when used on single user machines.</RANT>
As identified above, this issue manifests when more than one user uses a machine and their Offline folders (all redirected folders are configured this way by default) are in an offline state when the first user logs off. The second user cannot access
this 'offline' share so folder redirection fails. We get burnt as we have latency=0 configured for slow link detection with Offline folders so users always work offline. This is partly because of WAN optimisers in the network that lie to Windows
so the online/offline transition doesn't work on slow links (not MS's fault), and partly because it made sense for other reasons.
The workaround Microsoft and I came up with for our environment was to use individual file shares for each user. We had been using a common file share with each user folder under that file share. Changing to an individual share for each users
means the share is not locked by the previous user.
Examples
This would cause a problem if John then Emma logged on to the same machine. Folder redirection would fail for Emma:
\\FileServer1\Users$\john
\\FileServer1\Users$\emma
So would this if DFS was used
\\my.domain\users\john (points to \\FileServer1\Users$\John)
\\my.domain\users\emma (points to \\FileServer1\Users$\Emma)
This would fix the problem:
\\FileServer1\John$
\\FileServer1\Emma$
Unfortunately we then figured we could move these shares behind DFS like so:
\\my.domain\homes\john (points to \\FileServer1\John$)
\\my.domain\homes\emma (points to \\FileServer1\emma$)
This was wrong. The problem returned. I assume the share that is being locked is now the DFS root and not the user share.
The operations team here is very reluctant to go with direct access to the file servers and not use DFS as that will create issues for them in the future when they need to make file server changes. I sympathise with them but can't see an alternative
at the moment as we are deploying W7 and can't stop. If I'd picked this up earlier a third party product might have been the solution (MS actually suggested this when I opened my case).
I hope the information about individual shares above is helpful to someone. Otherwise I don't really have more to add but I needed the rant :-)
<RANT>BTW. Has anyone tested changing a user’s home directory path once it is cached? Try it. Test a scenario where you move the user from one file server to another. You will not enjoy the results. I'll say no more
than this as it is off topic, but it shows the lack of investment in the CSC feature in Windows. Very disappointing</RANT> -
Folder Redirection with missing documents....in Server 2012
Hello all,
I need urgent help! We had folder redirection enabled for all our users to a SAN drive with the following settings:
Grant user exclusive rights to Documents
Disabled
Move the contents of Documents to the new location
Enabled
Also apply redirection policy to Windows 2000, Windows 2000 Server, Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 operating
Systems
Enabled
Policy Removal Behavior
Restore contents
The SAN drive failed and the documents were no longer accessible! I disabled the policy and the users were able to access the files that had been synchronized to their PCs.
On recreating a new disk drive with the same drive letter and a folder with the same name as the old folder, I re-enabled the Folder Redirection Policy by changing the "GPO Status" from "All settings disabled" to "Enabled".
I also The users documents which were initially on their desktops and documents all disappeared!!!
How do I get them back?
I have disabled the policy and returned all the settings to disabled but the documents are yet to be restored!!! I need help as I don't know what else to do!Hi,
Do we have backup for these files? Besides, we can also check whether some files are on the new disk drive.
Based on my understanding, the real files should still be on the failed SAN drive. If we can’t restore the drive, we can restore these files from
backup.
In addition, based on my test, we can create a new folder under Documents, and re-enable the policy to see whether we can find back some files.
Best regards,
Frank Shen -
I just copied a folder from my desktop to my pen drive. It transferred fine. I then ejected the pen drive then pulled it out. On doing so it said it had not been ejected properly!!!!! The folder is now missing from my computer and the pen drive. Pulling my hair out please help!
When youi say Eject, the RAM copy of the Directory is written back to the drive. On a pen drive, this can take several seconds.
If you get too excited and don't wait those few seconds, the directory write will be incomplete, and the drive will lose its integrity or lose files or both. -
UCM 11g File missing from search result although file is accessable
When I do search without any criteria in UCM 11g, some files missing from search result although I know the files were checked into UCM already since I'm able to see these files using url similar to:
http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=GET_FILE&dID=12345
or use following url to get document information:
http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=DOC_INFO&dID=12345
the file is not in the search resule even search by ID.
also, the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
Is this a known problem? the same search was working in UCM 10 perfectly.
ThanksThe query seems able to retrieve the missing document. for example, I search by content ID, in the audit log (eanbled as you mentioned) give th efollowing information:
fusionappsattachments/6 09.13 06:22:03.878 IdcServer-3474 --- @ResultSet SearchResults ---
fusionappsattachments/6 09.13 06:22:03.878 IdcServer-3474 numFields=66,*numRows=1*,currentRow=0
also, the infomation following above give the deteail field information which match with the missing document.
I looks like UCM just did not bring it to UI as part of search result.
This seems match with my another finding as I mentioned earlier: the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
it seems query did find the documents but UI did not show it.
Not sure if this is a known bug. -
I have a SBS 2008 DC I would like to be able to change the Folder Redirection to a different server. I also would like to be able to test with one user. I read on the forums that it is best to use the wizards for SBS2008. The only problem
I have with using the wizards is that I am unable to test and I am also unable to use a network share for my redirection location.Hi,
I am sure you would get some help from :
http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2010/10/08/folder-redirection-in-small-business-server-2008.aspx
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/448583ca-471e-4a0c-9d26-aa9181e73962/folder-redirection-changing-location?forum=smallbusinessserver
User setting can be found:
Windows SBS Console > Shared Folders and Web Sites > Shared Folders - in Tasks panel click on Redirect folders for user accounts to the server.
Under Folder Names Select folder(s) you want to redirect (e.g. Documents).
Under User Accounts select accounts you want to have folders redirected.
Click OK
Binu Kumar - MCP, MCITP, MCTS , MBA - IT , Director Aarbin Technology Pvt Ltd - Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. -
Hi There,
I am deploying a custom windows 8.1 enterprise image via SCCM to Surface Tablets in our corporate environment. We currently are using windows 8 ONLY on surface hardware.
We only have 4 in the wild but all are having the same issue. The camera app tile/shortcut is missing from the all applications menu.
If I try to launch it from the c:\windows\camera folder i receive an error regarding Windows.UI.Xaml.dll as I believe it needs to be called via the modern environment (not desktop).
It dose not appear to be a hardware issue as third party camera apps seem to work.
Also, when i search for the app in windows store it cannot be found. I can find it when i search the store via IE but when I click on the link to open it in the windows store i am only presented with the stores front page.
Any advice would be appreciated as my users are keen to use the camera on their surface pro 3's.
ThanksThis sounds as though the Camera app has become corrupt in your image. I would attempt to reimage one of the devices with a vanilla environment to see if the issue appears, if not, I would
evaluate the difference between the Camera app in the vanilla environment and the production environment. Specifically, you may need to ensure that the correct version of Camera is provisioned in the base image.
Brandon
Windows Outreach Team- IT Pro
Windows for IT Pros on TechNet -
"copy to folder" for emails missing from latest Ns...
As already mentioned elsewhere, there are a lot of user complaints about this basic feature missing from many Nseries phones (N95, N78, etc). Is Nokia listening and/or planning a firmware upgrade for symbian S60v3 phones?
/discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=95862
http://forum.vodafone.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=6671
To archive email to another folder, the only "workaround" seems to be to copy & paste the email text into an Active note. Active notes so that you can organize them in subfolders, but then you suffer from the slowness of the ActiveNotes app and not being able to search. Is there a way to add the Active notes folder to the standard search locations?
Anyone else out there having found a better workaround? I can't believe that Nokia messed this one up. It was standard on my E50, and apparently in some older Nseries phones too.
Many thanxWhen youi say Eject, the RAM copy of the Directory is written back to the drive. On a pen drive, this can take several seconds.
If you get too excited and don't wait those few seconds, the directory write will be incomplete, and the drive will lose its integrity or lose files or both. -
Signed messages are missing from search results in a shared mailbox
We recently completed moving all user mailboxes to Exchange 2013 from Exchange 2010. We also have a policy that disables the 'download shared mailboxes' option in Outlook as it cause .ost files to get cumbersome and cause performance problems. This
means that shared mailboxes that users have open are all in 'Online' mode. Since the move to 2013, when users search against a folder in a shared mailbox, the only items that are returned are unsigned messages. Our customer base very frequently
signs email and these signed messages do not show up in results. This was working in Exchange 2010 so our users are frustrated by the sudden inability to receive complete and accurate search results.
If they perform a search of their local mailbox, which is using Cached mode, they are searching against their local index and they can find signed messages. But since the shared mailbox is not cached to their local system, they are relying on the Exchange
server index and it does not seem to be indexing any signed messages.
Does anyone know how to force Exchange 2013 to index signed messages?try to perform the below steps and check if it works or else we need to wait till Exchange 2013 SP1 which they have planned to bring digital signature message in exchange
Outlook 2007
In Outlook 2007, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
In Outlook, click Tools, Instant Search, and then click
Instant Search.
When the Microsoft Office Outlook dialog appears, you should see the following:
Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
New items are indexed when they arrive.
0 items remaining in "Mailbox -<<var>username</var>>"
0 items remaining across all open mailboxes.
Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013
In Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
In Outlook, click in the Search box.
Click the Search tab, click Search Tools, and then click
Indexing Status.
When the Indexing Status dialog appears, you should see the following:
Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
0 items remaining to be indexed.
Exchange Queries -
hi i have adifficult to acess itune. the avfoundationCF.dll is missing on my laptop error 7( windows error 126).how to reinstal it,thanks for your help
Taken at face value, you're having trouble with an Apple Application Support program file there. (Apple Application Support is where single copies of program files used by multiple different Apple programs are kept.)
Let's try something relatively simple first. Restart the PC. If you're using Vista or 7, now head into your Uninstall a program control panel, select "Apple Application Support" and then click "Repair". If you're using XP, head into your Add or Remove Programs control panel, select "Apple Application Support", click "Change" and then click "Repair".
If no joy after that, try the more rigorous uninstall/reinstall procedure from the following post. (If you've got XP, although the procedure is for Vista and 7, just read "Computer" as "My Computer", read "Uninstall a program control panel" as "Add or Remove programs control panel" and assume the system is 32-bit, and you'll be doing the right things.)
Re: I recently updated to vista service pack 2 and I updated to itunes 10.2.1 and ever -
Windows 8.1 Bluetooth missing from Device Manager
It appears after the latest round of windows automatic updates my native bluetooth device went missing. It is not visable in the device manager or the control panel settings. I have downloaded and reinstalled the latest wireless and bluetooth drivers, however I am still unable to view the device. This is a Yoga Pro 2 (64bit) running the most current Windows 8.1 updates. The latop has a native bluetooth adaptor which had been working with no issues. I have run services.msc and restarted the associated BT services and they are running. Would appreciate any help.
Are these the drivers that you updated?
http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/yoga-series/yoga-2-pro-lenovo/download...
Have you also updated your BIOS
http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/yoga-series/yoga-2-pro-lenovo/download...
Please do read the README instructions before updating BIOS.
Current System - Lenovo Y510P, GT755M SLI, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD + 24GB SSD
When your plans fail, your Real Story begins!! -
Image missing from Search results
When my search results come up, in the top left corner of the
results is a red x indicating a missing image. Checking the
properties of this image, it is a 28 x 30 pixel image. Address just
shows
http://robohelp/Robo/BIN/ (our
intranet site is
http://robohelp). What is this missing
image? and how can I make it appear (or delete).
Also strange thing happened this morning where clicking on
the search button brought up all the main navigation buttons again
where the search results should appear and also search field did
not work at all. I closed browser and started new session and all
is well now, but RoboHelp does some strange stuff sometimes.
Thanks.try to perform the below steps and check if it works or else we need to wait till Exchange 2013 SP1 which they have planned to bring digital signature message in exchange
Outlook 2007
In Outlook 2007, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
In Outlook, click Tools, Instant Search, and then click
Instant Search.
When the Microsoft Office Outlook dialog appears, you should see the following:
Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
New items are indexed when they arrive.
0 items remaining in "Mailbox -<<var>username</var>>"
0 items remaining across all open mailboxes.
Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013
In Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
In Outlook, click in the Search box.
Click the Search tab, click Search Tools, and then click
Indexing Status.
When the Indexing Status dialog appears, you should see the following:
Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
0 items remaining to be indexed.
Exchange Queries -
Windows 7 jumplist is missing from Firefox 15 beta
I'm on the beta update channel and I think I was recently updated to Firefox 15.0. After I start Firefox in Windows 7, I can't bring up a jumplist so I can't pin it to my taskbar.
Apparently this bug got pushed to the release channel now. After updating to 15.0.1, restarting Firefox used a new icon on the taskbar rather than the one that had been pinned before (as usual). But when I right click on the new icon to pin it, nothing happens. There's no jumplist at all, not even the minimal one that pops up for programs that don't make use of jumplist functionality. So I can't even pin the icon to my taskbar.
Maybe you are looking for
-
A305 - S6872 Laptop CD/DVD Rom does not show up on "My Computer"
How to I fix this problem. There's a "!" mark in the "Device Manager" for the cd/dvd rom drive. "!" DR7164O OHV364L SCSI CdRom Device "!" TSSTcorp CDDVDW TS-L633P There's also a "!" on the networks adapters. "!" Microsoft 6to4 Adapter "!" Microsoft I
-
After installing the reportservice/database i cannot use the Configuration Manager Console 2012 anymore with my own AD account. (The accounts of my colleagues are stil working) When i login i get the following message: The user account running the Co
-
I am currently running Adobe Pro 8 and use Groupwise as my primary email carrier. When I am creating a form and try to distribute it to myself to test to see if it works, I get a message that reads, "Failed to distribute the form via email. Detailed
-
Service condition for contract
HI, i have created service condition and I am trying to create a contract with reference that predefined activity ,in that the price is not coming automatically from the condition master ,(but for the purchase order the price is coming automatically
-
I'm trying to rescue files from a friend's 2.5" hard drive. It's a WD drive in a USB enclosure. It was formatted and used to store pictures and music. Now when connecting it to a PC or Mac it won't mount--it needs to be initialized. I've removed it f