Windows and OSX support for Proximity

Is there an install for Windows and OSX support for Proximity.
I have upgraded all of my endpoints to TC7.1.2. (SX, C Series, EX) and Proximity is working great however most of my users bring laptops to meetings not iOS devices.
Any timeframe ?

@dshumake; nice try ;) (thanks for being forgiving with us)
@ablaisdell; agree!
@fcosgrove; we are currently starting a limited trial for Win and Mac clients (EFT, part of TC 7.3). The main feature for the laptop client is sharing FROM your laptop to the video endpoint, so you can skip the cable, dongles etc in the room.
We do have plans for supporting call control and content receive to the laptop as well, but that's later.
The first PC & Mac version has target for first half 2015, but is subject to change (as in: not yet committed).
Br,
Henrik

Similar Messages

Would I be able to use the same external hard drive for Windows and OSX?

I plan to get an external HD to put a lot of my multimedia files on and for backups but I don't know if I'll need an individual one for each operating system. I am going to be running a MacBook Pro with both Windows and OSX through Boot Camp.

jengwall,
No, you won't need more than a single drive. There are several options to meet your needs.
OS X can partition your external, and the formats for the various volumes can be HFS+ (the native Mac format) or FAT-32 (Windows format). While OS X cannot create NTFS volumes, and it cannot write to them, it can read them. Any FAT-32 volumes created in OS X can be converted to NTFS by Windows, if and when you like.
Windows cannot natively read HFS+ volumes, and only the FAT-32 format will be both read and write for both Windows and OS X. However, there are some third-party solutions.
"Macdrive" is a Windows utility that allows it to access HFS+ volumes as read/write. On the Mac side, there is "MacFuse," which gives OS X the ability to not just read, but write to NTFS volumes.
Scott

[svn] 3663: Dita xml and xslt support for SkinStates

Revision: 3663
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-10-15 13:04:27 -0700 (Wed, 15 Oct 2008)
Log Message:
Dita xml and xslt support for SkinStates
Bugs: SDK-17166
QA: Yes
Doc: No
Tests: checkintests
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17166
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/templates/class-parts.xslt
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/TopLevelClassesGenerator.ja va

http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/1.4/tutorial/doc/JAXPXSLT6.html

Mobile Operating systems and Devices support for Dashboards 4.0

HI ,
Need Help on Mobile Operating systems and Devices support for Dashboards 4.0 from sp5 or higher.
According to below link ,some of the mobile devices are not supported.
Steps to view SAP BO Dashboards (Xcelsius) on Ipad
Note: Dashboards are currently not supported on IPhone devices even with latest version of mobile app.
Note: Dashboard Support to Android(Only Tab not Android phone) is available from SAP BO 4.1
Checked the PAM but ,couldn't get the info regarding devices.
Need Help!!!!!
Regards
Sushma

Hi Sushma,
Please check the below link & let me know for any assistance.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10e77da7-14a8-3010-6d98-e4aea55e7e56?QuickLink=index&…
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0134dbb-8f10-3010-5084-cf90dbb35284?QuickLink=index&…
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/507d3365-009b-3010-04b0-e5abc8f00c91?QuickLink=index&…
Dashboards on Mobile/ IPAD
--SumanT

Just bought a Nikon d750 and confused about adobe LR4 and PS6 support for the RAW files. I have DNG 8.7 but wondering if LR and PS will import direct soon Thanks for any advice

Just bought a Nikon d750 and confused about adobe LR4 and PS6 support for the RAW files. I have DNG 8.7 but wondering if LR and PS will import direct soon Thanks for any advice

Support for the Nikon D750 was introduced in the latest version of LR 5.7 and ACR 8.7 on Novemder 18th 2014.
Further updates to LR 4 were stopped when LR 5 was released on June 9th 2013. No further updates for bug fixes and new camera support.
Nada, LR 4 will never support Nikon D750. The Nikon D750 was introduced into the market in September 2014 some 15 months after further development of LR 4 was discontinued.
You can use the Adobe DNG program (free download for the package) to convert the Nef (raw) files from your Nikon D750 to the Adobe DNG format which will permit you to import those into LR 4. This is the crutch provided by Adobe to allow for the processing of raw files with outdated versions of LR and ACR.
You can also update the ACR plugin for PS CS6 to version 8.7 which can also work with the raw files from the D750. For direct support in Lightroom you will need to upgrade (paid) to version 5.7.

[svn:osmf:] 13966: 1. Integrate code changes from Matthew to remove timeBias and add support for subclip

Revision: 13966
Revision: 13966
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-02-03 15:04:44 -0800 (Wed, 03 Feb 2010)
Log Message:
1. Integrate code changes from Matthew to remove timeBias and add support for subclip
2. A minor bug fix with the index handler
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/HTTPNetStream.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/HTTPStreamingState.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/httpstreaming/f4f/HTTPStreamingF4FIndexHandler.as

Maybe you try posting in one of the Enterprise & Remote Computing forums:
http://forum.java.sun.com/category.jspa?categoryID=14
And please use the forum CODE tags for formatted readable display of your code on the board.
http://forum.java.sun.com/post!reply.jspa?messageID=9989322#

Downloaded Mountain Lion and lost support for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.

Downloaded Mountain Lion and lost support for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Anyone know how to get it back?

Odds are you running Office 2004, which is coded in PowerPC code. PowerPC is no longer supported.
You either must upgrade the newer version of Office that will work or downgrade OS X.
Allan

HT2477 Are documentS created with Microsoft office for windows and Microsoft office for mac are compatible with each other

Are documents created with Microsoft office for windows and Microsoft office for mac are compatible with each other?

As with a lot of software, it depends on the version of Word, and what features the author used.
Technically, Office 2010 for Windows and 2011 for Mac are supposed to be feature compatible. As are Office 2007 for Windows, and 2008 for Mac.
However, if a person using Office 2010 / 2011 used a feature that only exists in that version and sends the file to someone using Office 2007 / 2008, they would very likely have trouble opening the file, or having it display as intended.

Windows and OSX won't boot after partitioning

Hi so I have a 2012 MacBook pro, it is running mountain lion and I also boot camped it and installed windows 7. I partitioned the hard drives correctly and it has been running great. Today I was on windows and used the disk manager to shrink my windows partition so that I could create another seperate 5gb partition for school. After I did this, my computer was running fine until I restarted it. When the windows logo appears while booting, it freezes and it flashes a blue screen and then shuts down. When I hold down the option key to boot into Mac OSX, the only option that comes up is windows, not even my recovery disk.
How do I fix this? I need to boot into these because all of my school things are on these drives. Please help

Never in my reply did I say I don't use Boot Camp or not to use boot camp. But I don't. And I don't have Windows installed in its own partition. I use a VM for Windows on my Mac for the few Windows programs I run on the Mac.
I started to read that reply but then didn't finish it as that poster was talking about Win 8 and AFAIK right now neither Boot Camp or the driver package supplied by Apple for Windows supports Win 8. Even though it isn't much different then Win 7.
It does create a Separate partition, as does Win 7, that is a hidden partition, just like Win 7 does, but it is different in some ways from Win 7. So that may of been the original problem that poster was having.
In any event I don't think that post will help the OP of this thread. But I may be wrong. Only time will tell.
The big reasons I don't use Boot Camp is I can't stand Dual Boot system and that I can't Re-Partition the BC partition without screwing the whole system up. Tried it, didn't care for it, then removed it and went VM.
wjosten wrote:
You read that thread I provided the OP a link for...don't you use Boot Camp? Got any better ideas?

IMAC's Top graphics card frustration - Cheap and no support for Adobe Mercury Playpack Engine GPU Acceleration?

If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
Please, if you have a solution for me, let me know. Otherwise I find it pretty frustrating that I purchased a top-end iMAC, fully maxed-out in every way possible, and that the iMac doesn't support Adobe Premiere's Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration. Also, an old USB 2.0 Hub and thus the built-in SD card reader is slow. If you have SD cards with 95MB/s Transfer, Read and Write speeds, the iMAC will only transfer at around 30MB/s if you're lucky. Technically 480Mbs which is around 50MB/s but I haven't seen those speeds.
I figured this could at least be circumvented with a Thunderbolt SD card reader or a Thunderbolt to USB 3.0 adapter but of course no such thing exists.
Well, nothing with a reasonable price tag. This all might seem trivial to some but when you're uploading 24 hours of HD video footage from a 128GB SDXC card, the speed makes a big difference.
And come on, no BluRay support? Ridiculous. I get the politics of why but still, just ridiculous. It would be nice to be able to burn a BluRay to watch in my home theater system. There are other methods but BluRay is convenient and great for backing up large Video Files. Unfortunately BluRay looks like it's not going to make it. Maybe cable distribution companies will increase their Internet upload speeds one day and I can just store everything in the cloud and watch full length movies(that I've created) on Vimeo.
Anyways, I went and took a look at the hardware Apple stuffed inside my fancy (3.4 Ghz i7, 16GB 1333 DDR3, 2GB AMD 6970M, 256 GB SSD Internal and 2TB 7200 Internal) machine and it appears to be pretty middle of the range stuff. It's an iMAC, not a Mac Pro so why am I griping? Because my 2009 PC(which I tricked out over the last two years) is faster and does support the Mercury Playback Engine. I spent $2100 total on this PC which includes all my upgrades. I spent around $3300 on the iMAC. I feel ripped off.
Yes, I do love my iMAC on multiple levels but had I known my dated 2009 PC would render video projects faster, I would have gone with a MAC Pro or just a new PC. It seems that Mac is moving completely away from making high-end computers for niche markets(video editing) and focusing on their tiny laptops, IPADS and IPhones for the masses. Obviously smart from a capitalistic perspective(at present at least) but very frustrating for some.
I was actually told to purchase a MAC for video editing. I've been a PC guy for 15 years. I went with the iMAC because I had read many good things about it(probably just Apple propaganda) and also the MAC PRO was to be discontinued. Also the MAC Pro would have been triple the cost for what didn't seem like a whole lot more.
It's one's thing to prepackage a computer with inferior hardware(the iMAC I have is fast for most things and more than enough for 99% of the population) but to not allow us to pop open the computer and make a quit upgrade to the machine is what really makes me feel like I'm using a computer built for Grannies. I mean there is a reason my mother loves iMacs and Iphones. Amazing that I was able to upgrade my memory from 4 to 16GB but I've heard Apple has even done away with that. I get why they do it. Apple Warranty, Apple Care issues, Profit and World Domination: Apple wants a monopoly on everything.
Was great to see Adobe bounce back after the whole Flash/HTML5 thing and knock Final Cut Pro off the face of the Earth for good. People are still buying it b/c of the brand name but Final Cut is done. David Fincher used Adobe's Workflow for everything when he made The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo. Hollywood is making the shift and the world will follow. The Adobe Workflow has finally come together and there is just no way Apple can compete with Adobe Creative Cloud and an Engine that can just swap from Premiere to After Effects to Prelude to SpeedGrade to Photoshop to Story with speed for $29 bucks a month(or $49 for some). Apple better start supporting Adobe's Mercury Engine or they may have a problem. And if you're using Final Cut X, you're severely handicapping yourself. Problem is that people don't want to take the time to learn Adobe's products(steep learning curve for sure) which is where Apple's Granny software, and perhaps computers, comes in to play. Arnold Schwarzenegger once said "Milk is for babies, Real Men Drink Beer". I'm beginning to think that "Mac's are for Grannies, Real Men Use Adobe and PCs".
The major problem with Apple is you're forced to use Apple. Not sure but history has proven that people don't like to be forced into anything. Autocracies don't work. These systems eventually topple, even in the corporate world.
Amazon.com, now that's the company to emulate. What an amazing machine!
I've read that Apple may even discontinue the iMAC after 2013. Who knows?
If anyone has a solution for getting the Mecury Playpack Engine GPU acceleration to work with Premiere Pro CS6 on an iMAC 2011, please let me know. Like I wonder if you could Thunderbolt an External graphics card somehow? Or is an upgrade possible? Ahh...not worth the risk.
1) Graphcis Card - AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2048 MB (6990 would have been better or something from NVIDIA.
2) USB 2.0 Hub with only 480 Mb/sec
3) Seagate Baracude SATA I 7200 RPM drive with 3GB/s transfer rate and only a 32 GB Cach. It's ok. I would have expected at least a Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB SATA III 7200 RPM 64 MB or the Velociraptor at 10,000RPM.
4)APPLE SSD TS256C Flash Drive. As you can see, it doesn't stack up so well against other SSD Drive.
Just average. http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/hdd_lookup.phphdd=APPLE+SSD+TS256C

Whining and ranting about how iMacs can't do this or iMacs/orMacs can't do that is not going to get you a lot of help here.
Your "I love my MAC" is typical of the ever ubiquitous PC whiner.
If your video work needs were that computer intensive and critical , you should've done some online research and you should have budgeted for a Mac Pro.
Mac Pros are completely expandable and upgradeable unlike the iMac.
Mac Pros have much more faster and more CPU cores than the iMac line.
iMac line is limited to CPUs with 8 cores. The Mac Pros, I believe, are up to 16 core CPUs, now.
The Mac Pros can have their GPU upgraded and you even add/expand to use specialty audio/video cards.
Mac Pros are the defacto standard for real video work.
iMacs, even the high end model, is not really designed to do really heavy and intensive video work.
iMacs do do video creation and editing. Just not on the level that is needed from a more "Pro" computer.
It seems to me you are asking your iMac to do more than it was originally designed for, in terms of professional video editing.
You get a lot more out of a Mac Pro than an iMac for any real serious video, CGI or animation work.
You just didn't want to spend that much cash on one.
iMacs are not user upgradeable or friendly to user upgrades at all!!!
If you purchased a Mac Pro, you could've had that better, faster HD, better faster SSDs.
That said, I can offer no real help to but because of the nature of your post and the fact you just simply annoyed me, I feel some advice and explanations are in order
First off, you picked Adobe video editing software suite as your video creation software on the Mac. It's no secret to long-time video content creators on the Mac that Adobe products, especially those for video creation and editing are very user unfriendly on the Mac. Even though Macs are supported from Adobe, Adobe for a long time has treated the Mac and Mac users as second class citizens.
Before purchasing and installing Adobe Premiere, did you even check Adobe's site for the preferred system hardware and software requirements? Hmmm?
This is why you should KNOW what software you are going to be running on a computer first then research what computer make and model will run said software.
That's why Apple has its own apps like Aoerture, Logic and Final Cut.
Despite your ignorance in this matter, Final Cut Pro X is alive and doing well, thank you, and using this software on your iMac would kick Adobe Premier in the you know whats.
Final Cut Pro X is a complete video solution for and completely designed around the Mac.
Why are you using USB 2.0 connections for video work when you have a perfectly good FireWire 800 connection.
In case you are not aware, FireWire 800 is called so because it has a max throughput of 800 Mbps.
Your 2011 iMac can take up to 32 GBs of RAM. Not just 16 GBs.
This changed when the 2010 model iMacs came out.
Blu-ray? I believe you can buy external Blu-ray writers that work with Mac using said FW800 connection.
So you cite one movie and one videographer using Adobe Premier for your premise that Final Cut is dead in Hollywood?
Your argument that Apple locks you into everything in their world can be countered by saying Windows and Windows PCs lock you into the Windows world. What's your point?
Apple is not discontinuing their computers platforms any time soon.
All you are regurgitating is rumor. Probably from all of the PC crowd.
iMacs and professional desktop Macs are not going anywhere.
Currently, Apple is the only desktop/laptop computer maker that is still making a profit on their Macs and increasing their market share percentages for the last 5 years during which the PC market has continually slumped/dropped in its market share.

RDBMS and LATFORM SUPPORT for SAP XI

Hello!
I would like to know, whether the following RDBMS and PLATFORM SUPPORT-requirements (below) can be realized with SAP XI or not. I will be very thankful if someone can help me by answering of the following questions (if it is possible, Yes/No and with short explanation/comment)
<b>RDBMS</b>
a) database accept binary-large-objects (BLOBs) and be referenced via the relational engine.
b) standard pre-defined SQL queries and related calculations provided for use with industry standard reporting tools
c) database monitoring tools be used to manage impending maintenance needs and potential problems and performance impacts (i.e., tool will monitor and detect prior to real problem occurring)
<b>PLATFORM SUPPORT</b>
a) Software supported on OS clustered servers (If mutliple products, please indicate if all are support or list areas where clustering may not be recommended and why)
b) software supported on HP-UX 11.i V2 (r6) on Itanium
c) software supported on Windows 2003 sp1 (x64) on AMD Opteron
Thank you!
Regards
A. Henke

RDBMS
a) database accept binary-large-objects (BLOBs) and be referenced via the relational engine. - Better not to include custom objects in the SAP Database. It should be possible.
b) standard pre-defined SQL queries and related calculations provided for use with industry standard reporting tools, You can try,
c) database monitoring tools be used to manage impending maintenance needs and potential problems and performance impacts (i.e., tool will monitor and detect prior to real problem occurring) - Many installations use some tool to do monitoring, but SAP standard transactions are sufficient for good monitoring. try to practice them
PLATFORM SUPPORT
a) Software supported on OS clustered servers (If mutliple products, please indicate if all are support or list areas where clustering may not be recommended and why) - I think SAP will not support Clusters(except windows cluster, with some support). Your OS/Hardware vendor should support it on SAP environment.
b) software supported on HP-UX 11.i V2 (r6) on Itanium - Yes, i think
c) software supported on Windows 2003 sp1 (x64) on AMD Opteron - Yes

Windows 8.1 Support for MED-V

Hi
Can i deploy the Windows XP SP3 image as MED-v Workspace to Windows 8.1 Enterprise.
in other words, are MED-V supported to Windows 8.1 ??
Shailendra
Shailendra Dev

Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MED-V) is only supported on Windows 7 Professional, Ultimate, and Enterprise.
In Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 Professional and Enterprise, the virtualization engine Windows Virtual PC upon which MED-V is run is replaced by Client Hyper-V. Bear in mind, however, that support for Windows XP is ending in less than a month on April 8, 2014.
This applies to MED-V and virtual environments such as Hyper-V clients as well as physical machines. There
is a great write up on MED-V and Windows XP End of Support here which I would highly recommend reading through in addition to
the information on Windows XP EOS.
Brandon
MDOP on the Springboard Series on TechNet

Migration and SAP Support for BW 3.1

Hi,
I have couple of queries regarding Migration and SAP Support.
What is the required patch level that need to be mantained in BW 3.1 for a direct upgrade to BI 7.
I would like to know whether SAP still supports BW 3.1. I searched in SAP Service marketplace, but didn't get much information regarding this.
Your inputs are highly appreciated.
Regards,
Hari

Hello,
BW Upgrade from 3.x to 7.0
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/e62b9990-0201-0010-42a7-ddcf5c93cafd
Hope it will help you.
Regards,

Flex and multilanguage support for webUI

I am looking into Flex as the next-gen development system for
our web apps. I do not know very much about Flex at this time, but
I need to find out how Flex handles multilanguage capability.
Currently, we make heavy use of JS and DHTML for our UI
design, and to support different languages we separate out all our
strings into individual files (utf8) that are translated. The
client-side JS will make a call to the server to determine the
user's language preference and load the appropriate string file
when rendering the UI.
I need to know if something like this is possible in the Flex
environment, or how Flex handles multilanguage string separation.
Thanks

Hi Lalo,
well, I am still not sure what your problem is - but....
The selection of the Code Group for example happens in:
BAPI_CODEGROUP_CODE_GETLIST
Well, this method is called in ALM_ME_CODEGRP_GETDETAIL and there you find the line
langu = sy-langu
so this defines the language.
Perhaps this helps you to solve your issue and understand the process a little? So you are right - it is the GETDETAIL handler as such - but the language in there is defined by sy-language as you see. Change the language and all should be fine.
Regards,
Oliver
Edited by: Oliver Kaluscha on Jan 30, 2008 2:19 PM
oh - just to mention - MAM017 and so on are running under the RFC user in the backend - so the language of the current user on the PDA will not really help here I think.
Regards,
Oliver

When i bought my elements i selected for mac, but when i downloaded i got elements for windows and i paid for it as well. I want to get a download link for mac instead of windows, but there is no freaking way to contact these buys by phone! Any help? I am

Let me know please, i don't want to spend another 130 euros on this..

Please see Return, cancel, or exchange an Adobe order -
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/return-cancel-or-change-order.html
Chat support - For the link below click the Still Need Help? option in the blue area at the bottom and choose the chat option...
Get chat help with orders, refunds, and exchanges (non-CC)
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-b.html ( http://adobe.ly/1d3k3a5 )

Windows and OSX support for Proximity

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for