Windows DHCP Server and Linux DHCP Relay Agent

We are trying to organize a VLAN (say VLAN 1) for guests who must be assigned IP addresses from a DHCP server in a different VLAN (VLAN 2). This DHCP server is configured with two scopes - 172.16.0.0/24 (for VLAN 2) and 172.16.4.0/24 (for the Guests
VLAN 1). The DHCP server successfully distributes addresses to clients in its VLAN (it has the IP address 172.16.0.2). For the clients in the other VLAN a DHCP Relay Agent has been setup on the router. It is DHCRELAY running on Linux (CentOS) which has
been configured to accept the DHCPDISCOVER broadcasts coming on the VLAN1 interface of the router and forward these to the DHCP server. The IP address of the VLAN1 interface of the router is 172.16.4.254 and on the VLAN2 interface - 172.16.0.254
The problem is that the DHCP server won't respond with a DHCPOFFER message to the relay agent. I have traced the frames on the router and on the DHCP server. They arrive on the DHCP server with the correct GIADDR of the relay agent. According to all documentation,
if a scope has been configured on the DHCP server and it receives a unicast message with the GIADDR set by a relay agent that matches one of the configured scopes, the DHCP server must send a unicast DHCPOFFER to the relay agent. But it doesn't.
Here is what Wireshark reports (ignore the Destination port unreachable messages, the DHCP service was stopped at the time Wireshark was running)
When the service is running, there are just DHCPDISCOVERs - no OFFER. You can see that the server has the two scopes configured:
The relay agent seems to work normally - it forwards the DHCPDISCOVERs to the server continuously (tried many times with ipconfig /renew on the client).
I read many posts about this problem. Some users had other services running on the DHCP server that used the DHCP port, but I don't have such an issue (you see that when the service is stopped, an ICMP port unreachable is sent which is correct). Others however
did not find a solution. Am I missing something? Is there something specific when using the DHCRELAY agent from DHCPD? Can I turn on some verbose logging to track this down? Thanks in advance.

WIth DHCP, there is really nothing to configure. If the Relay Agent/IP Helper is pointing to it, and the VLAN subnet exactly matches the scope subnet, then it should just work.
What I've seen in the VLAN config is either a static route back to the subnet the DHCP server itself is sitting on is not configured or incorrectly configured, or there are ports blocked (need UDP, too, since that's what DHCP uses to pass the OFFER), and
other necessary ports are opened, then it should just work.
Sometimes NIC teaming on the DHCP server will cause it. Not sure. Microsoft doesn't support teaming prior to Windwos 2012, but it doesn't mean that it doesn't work. Don't get me wrong, teaming works nicely, but they just don't support it because they never
certified the drivers, that's all.
The issues I've seen with DHCP relays and VLANs in the forums are usually based on misconfigs in the VLAN or ports blocked. Sometimes we'll refer to call Microsoft Support for specific, hands-on assistance. And searching the threads, from what
I've found that if they did call support, they've never posted back what the problem was based on or the resolution. I can post a couple of them for you to read through, but there were never any response with the actual resolution.
If you like, you also have the option to contact Microsoft Support. Here's a list of phone numbers if you choose this option:
http://support.microsoft.com/contactus/
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCITP/EA, MCTS Windows 2008/R2 & Exchange 2007, Exchange 2010 EA, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Technical Blogs & Videos: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/
This post is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

Similar Messages

  • DHCP server and ip helper-address issue

    Question,
    By accident I had configured an IP HELPER-ADDRESS on a VLAN interface pointing to a DHCP server with an IP addrees in the same VLAN ( ip subnet ).
    Some users had complaints and there were BAD ADDRESS entries in our DHCP server registered.
    Can anyone explain to me why this is an issue please ?
    My guess is that the the DHCP server receives the DHCPREQUEST from the client via the braodcast request and via the unicast request from the ip helper-address configuration. But does this really interfere with the DHCPACK and DHCPOFFER packets afterwards ?

    Alex,
    I've not been able to capture the network packets but I can understand if the server would send DHCPNACK requests ( wxhich would be a normal process ).
    I just don't understand why so many users suddenly have issues and my DHCP scope is filling up with BAD ADDRESSES.
    My assumption is that the client receives 2 valid DHCP responses ( one form the actual DHCP server and another one from the router, acting as DHCP relay agent ) and acknowledges them, but the DHCP process is somewhere corrupted ( either on the DHCP server or the DHCP client ).
    I want a technical explanation for this issue :-)

  • DAC 10.1.3.4.1 Server on Windows (64 bit) and Linux x86 (64 bit)?

    Hi Friends,
    Please confirm wheteher Oracle Business Intelligence Data Warehouse Administration Console 10.1.3.4.1 Server is supported on
    Windows (64 bit) and Linux x86 (64 bit)
    Because from edelivery.oracle.com i could see the downloads only for windows and Linux and not specified as 32/64 - bit
    so will it mean that the same dump is used for both 32 and 64 bit
    1) Oracle Business Intelligence Data Warehouse Administration Console 10.1.3.4.1 for Microsoft Windows (V16377-01)
    can the above dump is used for both 32 and 64 bit windows?
    2) Oracle Business Intelligence Data Warehouse Administration Console 10.1.3.4.1 for Linux x86 (V16378-01)
    can the above dump is used for both 32 and 64 bit Linux?
    The reason is because for OBIA 7.9.6.3 configuration both the Informatica Power Centre and DAC Server should co-exist
    and i could see seperate installer for 32 and 64 bit for both Windows and Linux whereas i couldn't see it for DAC Server
    Please confirm .
    Regards,
    DB

    It is supported on both platforms. With Linux however, if you have any issues you can to install in a windows environment, then copy over the folder structure. Also, you can possibly run into issues running the setup.exe on 64bit windows. When you open the install directory, go to dac/disk1/install and run the executable for win32. win64bit can return an error where it says it cannot create certain temp directories. It is a known java bug you can find in the support website.
    Edited by: user12838563 on Jul 13, 2011 11:35 PM

  • WRT160NL built in DHCP server and WEB server stop to work

    Hello all!
    My home network based on the WRT160NL with one wireline PC, two wireless PCs and wireless printer works with no problems - connections are at full speed, no drop outs, wireless and wireline QOS is perfect. But then quite regularly every two or three days suddenly the router internal DHCP servers stops to work - I see with the wireshark that my wireline PC sends the DHCP requests to the router but router does not reply to them. If at the same moment the other PC's are allready in use and got theirs IP before they can surf the internet uninterrupted. Only router reboot helps to solve this situation. After the reboot DHCP server immediately acknowledges DHCP request from the PC and assigns him his IP number.
    Sometime this situation occurs when IP address is already assigned, I can surf the internet, routing works, I can ping the router but I can not access the router's built in web server. Neither via  IE, neither via FF.
    I do not use P2P programs, IP traffic over the router is very light - no internal traffic between PCs, no file transfers to the USB flash key and WAN internet connection is 1Mbs. I have upgraded to the latest firmware Ver.1.00.01.17. Nevertheless problem occurs quite regularly about every three days.
    I try to reproduce the problem more frequently and there is the way how to do that - I start to watch IP TV on my wireline PC (usually I watch my IP TV via the STB connected directly to the DSL modem) so IP TV multicast now goes through the router. It is about 5 - 6 Mbs and about 500 pps of IP traffic. This IP TV stream very often causes internal web server and DHCP server to stop. So although I can watch IP TV and surf the web on my PC with no problems, if other PC's are powered up during this situation they will not get theirs IP addresses.
    I see in other posts on this forum that similar behavior can be triggered also with the heavy read/write traffic to the attached USB flash key.
    So my conclusion would be:
    - are the problems above known to Linksys/Cisco, do they acknowledge them, do they work on them
    - when we can expect new firmware release - can we expect new release for this model at all
    Best regards
    Message Edited by srus on 02-12-2010 04:05 AM
    Message Edited by srus on 02-12-2010 04:14 AM

    Ridcully thank you for your post, I did not execute the procedure you suggested. Prior to execute it I want to get more background on it? Why do you think that reconfiguring from the factory defaults would solve my problem? Are you 100% sure that this is the solution or are you just guessing?
    Router offers backup and restore functionality where you can store current configuration into file on PC and latter restore it. Can I use this functionality in your procedure or should I reconfigure all router settings manually?

  • LAN was down ie Users are not getting ip from DHCP server after enabling DHCP snooping

    Hi All ,
    Enclosed file has network connectivity diagram.
    1. L3 vlan's ie 2,3,4,5 and 6 are configured on ACC-CR1 and ACC-CR2. 
    2.Trunk is configured between Core switches ( CR1 and CR2) and access switches .VTP mode is transparent on all switches.L2 vlans are configured on all access switches.
    3.DHCP is server is located at different location and is reachable over MPLS.
    Without enabling dhcp snooping , users connected to access switches (Sw1,sw2,sw3 and Sw4 ) are getting ip address from DHCP server without any problem and everything is working fine.
    But users connected to Sw3 and Sw4 are getting ip address from rouge DHCP server which is not pingable from any one of the switch.
    So we have configured DHCP snooping for all vlan's on CR1 , CR2 , SW3 and SW4 and "trusted uplink ports" which are connected to WAN routers from CR1 and CR2  and also "trusted uplink ports " of Sw3 and Sw4 which are connected to CR1 and CR2.
    As soon we have enabled DHCP snooping and trusted respective uplink ports , users are not getting ip address from remote DHCP server and even users connected to Sw1 and SW2 are facing same issue.
    Note : DHCP snooping is not configured on SW1 and SW2.
    Why users are not getting ip address from remote DHCP server as soon as we enabled dhcp snooping on Core switches and two access switches ie sw3 and sw4 ? what could have caused DHCP packets to be dropped ? Any idea would be appreciated .

    Hi,
    as you say: " HSRP is configured between CR1 and CR2 and Vlans are active on CR1" does it mean there are L3 intrefaces configured in each VLAN on your CR switches and ip hepler-address pointing to the remote DHCP server is configured on each of them?
    I know it's difficult in a productive environment but IMHO you need to find out where are the DHCP offers dropped.
    Either by enabling DHCP debugging or by capturing packets via Wireshark, e.g.
    Best regards,
    Milan

  • Windows Home Server and Apple TV 2

    There are some old threads talking about Windows Home Server and the original Apple TV - the HP Windows Home Servers actually have excellent Mac support and out of the box with the Twonky Media Server that is bundled with the HP WIndows Home Servers would stream to the original Apple TV with no issue.
    The wrinkle is the Apple TV 2 requires Home Sharing. I'm not going to debate good/bad - it is what it is. I was searching for a way to get my WHS working with my Apple TV 2 since I'm finally getting around to automating the transcoding of my Tivo files and I would much rather my WHS be my media server than my Mac. I came across this article that seems perfectly reasonable:
    http://forum.wegotserved.com/index.php/topic/16359-whs-and-apple-tv-v2/
    I haven't tried it yet, but it seems perfectly reasonable. Has anyone else tried it? I'll report back either way - if I remember to

    "But can it be both simultaneously?
    Both a server and a media machine that is showing a movie on your TV?"
    Yes it can, no problems.
    The Mini Server OSX is pretty much the same as the client Snow Leopard, complete with Front Row, iTunes, Mail, Safari etc, but no iLife09 supplied - you will have to pay extra for that.
    It will do everything that Snow Leopard will do but has all the server capabilities too if you know how to set it up/use the software.
    The only things I had trouble with was I can't find Migration Assistant and a strange quirk is that it won't share a USB connected printer across a network! No sign of printer sharing in System prefs but I guess you can do it via the Server config somewhere...
    I just used CUPS to enable Bonjour printer sharing - works fine
    I have been able to insatll everything I had on my previous CoreDuo Mini including Final Cut Express, iLife09, EyeTV, some bit torrent stuff - all works fine...
    I really like the fact that I can plug two monitors in - I have the MiniDVI connected to a 50" plasma and 1080p Projector (using an HDMI splitter), the Mini Display port feeds a separate 20" widescreen monitor - when the plasma/PJ is switched off the main display automatically switches back to the 20" monitor
    All in all this MiniServer is a great little HTPC - powerful and silent with 1TB of storage. The Server software is a bonus I haven't even looked at as yet

  • Please help...i have a windows 2012 server and it keeps closing after 30 mins...

    hi. i have a windows 2012 server and it keeps closing after 30 mins...i am connected thru RDP and have looked everywhere online for a tutorial to change the setting that keeps closing it but can't find it anywhere! please help!

    Hi,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum. 
    Have you check the timeout and reconnection setting for RDP?
    Does disconnection happens on active session or Idle session? 
    We can configure the setting by collection properties or by GPO setting.
    On collection Properties check the Timeout Tab and set the setting according to your requirement. On GPO we can find this setting on below mention path and check according to it.
    Computer Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Session Host\Session Time Limits 
    User Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Session Host\Session Time Limits 
    You can check Configuration 1 Part from below article.
    [Forum FAQ] Restrict number of Active Sessions in RDS 2012 and 2012 R2
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/00c2252b-8ec0-489f-8da2-07a434a9b5a2/forum-faq-restrict-number-of-active-sessions-in-rds-2012-and-2012-r2?forum=winserverTS
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki

  • What is available on new Windows servers that allow you to write scripts that can work directly with Windows, SQL Server, and Exchange Server?

    What is available on new Windows servers that allow you to write scripts that can work directly with Windows, SQL Server, and Exchange Server?
    a. PowerShell
    b. isql
    c. osql
    d. sqlcmd

    All questions seem to be from the interview or a test. I think I even took this test once, it's KForce test.
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Becker's Law
    My blog
    My TechNet articles

  • Can I use DHCP snooping and IOS DHCP server on the same switch stack

    Hello,
    I am shortly going to be deploying a Cisco CallManager solution for a customer whose network comprises stacks of Catalyst 3850 switches.
    There is no separate core/server farm switch so the CallManager servers, voice gateways and IP phones will all plug into the same stack and be in the same VLAN (not my choice!).
    For security we want to enable DHCP snooping and were planning on using the IOS DHCP server on the Catalyst switch stack.
    Will this work? - when I enable DHCP snooping in networks with separate access layer switches I set the uplinks to the core as trusted links.
    I am not sure whether DHCP snooping will work in this case. Do I need to set the VLAN interface on the switch as trusted, is this even possible?
    Unfortunately I do not have access to a layer 3 switch to test this at the moment.
    Thanks

    Nope.  That's the issue.
    They'll sync on a third device acting as a hotspot, but the device sending a signal is not "on" the network it creates so the airport is all by itself on that network.  At least that is what it looks like to me.  Anyone have another take on it?  Seems pretty silly that an iPad can put out a wifi signal, an Airport Express can receive a wifi signal, and yet there is no simple way to get them to communicate under this particular condition.

  • Installing Windows Server and Linux on a hyper-v

    Scott Alan Miller wrote:
     But we have lots of Windows too.
    That allow the sunlight into your office?! :)

    Are you allowed to install Linux in a hyper-v on the same hardware as a Windows server? Also, would there be any issues to crop up? I am curious because I want to put Windows Server 2012 on one VM, Exchange on another VM, and then a Linux Server on another VM all on the same physical hardware. Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V would be hosting them all. The reason for the Linux Server is to use it for anti-virus or spam etc. and Linux is a free OS. I am curious though how it will jive with a Windows domain as well as being on the same machine as a hosted VM.
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

  • Is it possible to turn of DHCP server and still route?

    I would like to use my airport extreme as a router but have another computer be the DHCP server. It looks like if I turn on routing DHCP turns on and there is no way to turn it off.
    Thanks for any help.

    That's pretty unfortunate. It seems like a pretty normal thing to do. So I am going to have to have a separate router just because airport extreme doesn't support this. Seems like most of the routers out there do allow this.
    Thanks.

  • OS X server, DHCP Server and random blocked IPs

    Hello !
    I use a Mac Mini as a DHCP server for my wireless network. It is connected to internet through a wired modem and gives an IP (through Airport) to the computers that ask for it.
    Everything works quite fine... Unless, sometimes, clients obtain an adress but cannot browse the web nor connect to local network. The ip is just "blocked".
    If i try to use it on an other computer (manually), it just doens't work.
    So, I must change the ip, by changing the DHCP Name of the computer (otherwise, the server always give the same adress), to fix the problem.
    What is strange, is that a few time after, the incriminated ip works new ! Until it is down again...
    My bootpd config file is the fallowing;
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
    <plist version="1.0">
    <dict>
    <key>NetBoot</key>
    <dict/>
    <key>Subnets</key>
    <array>
    <dict>
    <key>allocate</key>
    <true/>
    <key>dhcpdomainname</key>
    <string>antoine.maille.priv</string>
    <key>dhcpdomain_nameserver</key>
    <array>
    <string>81.253.149.1</string>
    <string>80.10.246.3</string>
    <string>10.0.0.1</string>
    </array>
    <key>dhcpldapurl</key>
    <array>
    <string>ldaps://Mac Mini/</string>
    </array>
    <key>dhcp_router</key>
    <string>10.0.0.1</string>
    <key>lease_max</key>
    <integer>604800</integer>
    <key>leasetimesecs</key>
    <string>86400</string>
    <key>name</key>
    <string>DHCP WiFi</string>
    <key>net_address</key>
    <string>10.0.0.0</string>
    <key>net_mask</key>
    <string>255.255.255.0</string>
    <key>net_range</key>
    <array>
    <string>10.0.0.10</string>
    <string>10.0.0.100</string>
    </array>
    <key>selectedportname</key>
    <string>en1</string>
    <key>uuid</key>
    <string>FEB30FD5-3749-480E-9FEB-BD2C20206431</string>
    </dict>
    </array>
    <key>allow</key>
    <array/>
    <key>bootp_enabled</key>
    <true/>
    <key>deny</key>
    <array/>
    <key>detectother_dhcpserver</key>
    <true/>
    <key>dhcp_enabled</key>
    <true/>
    <key>oldnetbootenabled</key>
    <false/>
    <key>relay_enabled</key>
    <true/>
    <key>relayiplist</key>
    <array/>
    <key>timeServiceStarted</key>
    <string>2008-11-26 22:59:19 +0100</string>
    </dict>
    </plist>
    Do you have any idea of what I should do to fix that problem ?
    Thanks !
    alex

    Brandon Macinnis wrote:
    Dnar,
    Thanks for the follow up bit about using the smbutil statshares command.  I used that and could confirm that I am also able to force it to connect with smb2.  Oddly though, in the stat share info it still says "AUTO_NEGOTIATE"
                                  SMB_NEGOTIATE                 AUTO_NEGOTIATE
                                  SMB_VERSION                   SMB_2.1
    But maybe that just means something else and not the fact that it did not auto negotiate to SMB.  I guess for now this will be what I have to do to use smb2.
    I think in this case the AUTO_NEGOTIATE merely means it will auto negotiate a connection between SMB1, SMB2, and (from your data) also SMB2.1 this would have nothing to do with auto negotiating between SMB2 and AFP, which from this thread appears broken.
    I also would like to thank Brandon for the tip about smbutil statshares, I had been looking for a simple way to tell what version of SMB was being used to test my NAS.
    For everyone's benefit, it would appear from the above that whilst Apple advertise Mavericks as using SMB2 they have gone as far as implementing SMB2.1 and merely list it only as SMB2 for simplicity and due to the fact there is not a huge different between SMB2 and SMB2.1
    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Message_Block#SMB_2_and_3

  • Slow logons on windows 2012 server and windows 7 sp 1 devivce

    Hello everybody,
    I've a windows user reporting slow logons on one of our clients.
    The domain is a 2012 domain and the device with the issue is a windows 7 sp1.
    The winlogon message event ID 6005 appears (winlogon taking too long to handle notification request)
    Also NETLOGON message event id 5719 saying can not secure channel with the DC, because there're no one available).
    Profile is not set to roaming.
    The system logs are uploaded to this link:
    https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=2CDBBADCC474A82C!241&authkey=!AM99cXm2AaNp8Wg&ithint=folder%2czip
    Resetting the password of the computer object is succesfull but I can not be resetting the password now and then.
    The GP setting for process login scripts synchronously is not configured.
    The GP setting that makes the computer wait for the network set to 0 then causes a temp profile to be loaded.
    Please help me I don't know what else to do.
    Regards

    Hello Britt,
    Thanks a lot for answering.
    Looking at the DNS server found no reverse lookup zone configured. I didn't setup the server so I didn't know that. I did a search and AD seems to have no problem with that.
    Here's an ipconfig from the SERVER:
    Windows IP Configuration
       Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : Server
       Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . : NEPedi.local
       Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
       IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : NEPedi.local
    Ethernet adapter NIC1:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet #2
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : F0-1F-AF-E4-C4-FF
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::586e:e054:8cb2:fd10%13(Preferred)
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.2.10(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.2.1
       DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 384835503
       DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1A-95-A4-94-F0-1F-AF-E4-C5-00
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : ::1
                                           127.0.0.1
                                           8.8.8.8
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 12:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Tunnel adapter isatap.{2C549BDD-1164-4933-8E08-A725CB8E4CB4}:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #3
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    And the client has this parameters configured:
     Network Adapter  Intel(R) 82578DM Gigabit Network Connection
     IP Address   192.168.2.135
     MAC Address   84:2B:2B:C3:2C:8B
     Gateway   192.168.2.1
     DHCP Enabled   Yes
     DHCP Server   192.168.2.1
     DHCP Lease Expires  09/26/2014 09:01:07 AM
     DHCP Lease Obtained  09/24/2014 09:01:07 AM
     DNS Server Search Order  192.168.2.10
     IP Enabled    Yes
     IP Subnet    255.255.255.0
     WINS Primary Server 
     WINS Secondary Server 
     Last Check Date  9/25/2014 12:01:47 AM
    I'll post a complete ipconfig from the client later, because I have to remote in and now it's not available.
    Regards.

  • Interesting problem with RAID, Windows 2008 server, and Ubuntu

    sooooo, i got the system working and linux loved it.  just adored it.
    however, Windows did not.  Windwos 2008 server hard locks from time to time.  i fianlly figured out that it had to do with the RAID 0 i was running, that didn't really succeed.
    However, when i rebuilt the RAID and everything on it, it refuses to recognize the disk, sayign that windwos cannot determine if this drive has a valid system volume on it.
    Ubuntu 9.04 server, however, just took it and made it work great.
    I enabled the PCI Bus SATA to be Master in the BIOS, and then Windows Server 2008 said that it could not determine if the drive was bootable.  Then i went back and redid the raid, and it did the original error.
    I inserted a windows xp disk, destroyed the RAID, and then installed the software on a NEW disk.   While it installed fine, it gave me an IRQL_not_less_than_or_equal error.  It boots in safe mode, but no where else.  I tried installing the NVRAID and MCP55 drivers in safemode and what not, but still, it refused to cooperate.  I went back to ubuntu, this time the desktop/workstation versions, and i am doing an alternate install with RAID...much to my disappointment becuase now i will have to use VirtualBox to isntall windows...and if that fails, i'll be really pissed.
    My settings are as follows:
    SATA Controller 0-5 enabled
    NVRAID- enabled
    PCI BUS SATA- Option ROM Enabled, Master Enabled, and 0040h latency
    MAC LAN- same as above
    MAC LAN1- has master disabled, but the other stuff is the same
    Serial port A is on AUTO, B is disabled, and floppy is disabled.
    Option Rom is PFA relocation.
    Also, my AEC A6880 is giving me a ROM expansion error, even though, in both OSes it can be seen....usualy.  I just want to fix it
    lastly, my LSI PCI-E scsi adapter is not being seen at ALL. 
    thanks guys.

    Quote
    Also, my AEC A6880 is giving me a ROM expansion error, even though, in both OSes it can be seen....usualy.  I just want to fix it
    lastly, my LSI PCI-E scsi adapter is not being seen at ALL. 
    Turn off onboard raid ctrl 1st. There are conflicting.
    Quote
    I enabled the PCI Bus SATA to be Master in the BIOS, and then Windows Server 2008 said that it could not determine if the drive was bootable.
    Known issue, partition mess:
    http://www.google.bg/search?hl=bg&ei=W-l3Sq_4NMbdsgbHnKmmBQ&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=windows+cannot+determine+if+this+drive+has+a+valid+system+volume+on+it.&spell=1
    Quote
    I inserted a windows xp disk, destroyed the RAID, and then installed the software on a NEW disk.   While it installed fine, it gave me an IRQL_not_less_than_or_equal error.  It boots in safe mode, but no where else.  I tried installing the NVRAID and MCP55 drivers in safemode and what not, but still, it refused to cooperate.
    What's the BSOD error? Are you using XP installation disk with included SP3?

  • Out of available IP addresses on one DHCP server, will other DHCP servers field the request?

    I have three WinServer 2012 R2 domain controllers that also act as DNS and DHCP servers.
    I have a guest wireless network that has its own subnect, 10.121.176.0/20
    We have our DHCP scopes split this way across the three domain controllers with a DHCP lease time of 1 day
    Domain controller 1, 10.121.176.11 - 10.121.181.255 for a total of 1,525 addresses
    Domain controller 2, 10.121.182.0 - 10.121.186.255 for a total of 1,280 addresses
    Domain controller 3, 10.121.187.0 - 10.121.191.254 for a total of 1,279 addresses
    This gives us a total of 4,084 addresses to hand out on our guest wireless network which is plenty. I just looked at each servers stats and this is what I see
    Domain controller 1 - 717 addresses in use, 808 available
    Domain controller 2 - 900 addresses in use, 380 available
    Domain controller 3 - 1280 address in use, 0 available
    On domain controller 3 I am seeing lots of DHCP events
    Event ID 1063 - There are no IP addresses available for lease in the scope or superscope "GuestWireless-176
    Event ID 20287 - DHCP client request from 28E14CE87EFB was dropped since the applicable IP address ranges in scope/superscope GuestWireless-176 are out of available IP addresses
    Two questions:
    Once Domain Controller 3 rejects the DHCP request since it is out of addresses, will this request be fulfilled by one of my other two domain controllers?
    Is there any way to even out the leases on these DHCP servers? Not sure the mechanism behind a client choosing one DHCP server over another

    1 yes, the dhcp server who's scope is full will not do a dhcp
    'offer'
    2 dhcp that answers fastest with a 'offer' will win. A delay is configurable (but changes nothing
    about the root scenario were the fastest will win)
    Note that if the scopes overlap on the servers, they might not lease out all the addresses in the scope.
    I would enlarge the scope as you will want to fence against unavailability of one of the servers (or a network connection for that matter). you currently have more addresses leased out than any set of two of your servers can offer.
    MCP/MCSA/MCTS/MCITP

Maybe you are looking for