Windows Multi Site/Geo Cluster

Hi,
I am looking for a Multi Site Cluster solution for File Server and SQL DB. Could you pls help with any case study of solution approach for building the Multi Site cluster using Windows 2012 ?
What is recommended for Replication
Which all Application/DB are compatible for Multi Site
Are there any implementation documents
pls suggest
General suggestion: if possible use async replication rather then sync. Sync mirror puts high stress on WAN and lack of reliable channels can lead to cluster either non-operational (all WAN links down so cluster node w/o quorum kills itself) or brain split
issue (all WAN links down so separated cluster nodes continue working AS IS damaging data). For async replication you may look @ DFS-(R) as a file server, see:
Distributed File System
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753479(v=ws.10).aspx
For SQL Server look at AlwaysOn in async way, see:
AlwaysOn for SQL Server
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff877884.aspx
Availability Modes
The availability mode is a property of each availability replica. The availability mode determines whether the primary replica waits to commit transactions on a database until a given secondary replica has written the transaction log records to disk (hardened
the log). AlwaysOn Availability Groups supports two availability modes—asynchronous-commit mode and synchronous-commit mode.
Asynchronous-commit mode
An availability replica that uses this availability mode is known as an asynchronous-commit replica. Under asynchronous-commit mode, the primary replica commits transactions without waiting for acknowledgement that
an asynchronous-commit secondary replica has hardened the log. Asynchronous-commit mode minimizes transaction latency on the secondary databases but allows them to lag behind the primary databases, making some data loss possible.
Of course it's possible to configure SMB 3.0 failover file share on geo-separated sites and use Failover Cluster Instances for SQL Server in the same scenario. Just make sure you configure reliable witness (you'll have to do it for SQL Server AlwaysOn either
way...) on some third location. For file server I'd suggest to use some sort of a software replication in sync way instead of a geo-distributed physical shared storage. That one is for SQL Server and SteelEye Data Keeper but you can use any Windows-native
(preferred) software as well. See:
SQL Server Geo-Cluster with software shared storage
http://clusteringformeremortals.com/2009/10/07/step-by-step-configuring-a-2-node-multi-site-cluster-on-windows-server-2008-r2-–-part-3/
Good luck! :)
StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

Similar Messages

Windows 2008 R2 Multi-Site (geo) Cluster File Server

We need to come up with a new HA file server (user drive data) solution complete with DR. It needs to be 2008 R2, cater for about 25TB of data, and be suitable for 500 users (nothing high end on I/O). I don't want to rely on DFS for any form of resilience
due to its limitations for open files. We have two active-active data centers (a third can be used for file share quorum).
We could entertain:
1)
Site1 - 2 x HP ProLiants with MSA storage, replicating with something like DoubleTake to a third HP Proliant at site 2 for DR.
2)
Site1 - 2 x HP ProLiants with local storage and VSA or HP StoreVirtual array (aka LeftHand), using SAN replication to site 2 where we could have a one or two node config of the same setup.
Ideally I would like all 3/4 nodes in these configurations to be part of the same multi-site cluster to ensure resources like file shares are in sync. With two pieces of storage across this single cluster (either a DoubleTake or SAN replication to local
disks in DR) will this work? How will the cluster/SAN fail over the storage?
We do have VMWare 5.0/1 (not 5.5 yet). We don't have Hyper-V yet either. Any thoughts on the above, and possible alternatives welcome. HA failover RTO we'd like in seconds. DR longer, perhaps 30 mins.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts and guidance.

For automated failover between sites, the storage replication needs to have a way to script the failover so you can have a custom resource that performs the failover at the SAN level before the disks come online.
DoubleTake has GeoCluster which should accomplish this. I'm not sure about how automated Lefthand's solution is for multi-site clusters.
VMware has Site Recovery Manager, though this is really an assisted failover and not really an automatic site failover solution. It's automated so that you can failover between sites at the push of a button, but this would need to be a planned failover.
RTO of seconds might be difficult to accomplish as you need to give the storage replication enough time to reverse direction while giving the MS cluster enough time to bring cluster applications online.
When planning your multi-site cluster, I'd recommend going with 2 nodes on each site and then use the file share witness quorum on your 3rd site. If you only had one node on the remote site, the primary site would never be able to failover to the remote
site without manually overriding the quorum as 1 node isn't enough to gain enough votes for quorum. With 2 nodes on each site and a FSW, each site has the opportunity to gain enough votes to maintain quorum should one of the sites go down.
Hope this helps.
Visit my blog about multi-site clustering

2008 R2 Multi-Site Cluster Possible without Third Party Software?

2008 R2 Multi-Site Cluster Possible without Third Party Software? I know it has been asked, but I haven't seen a specific answer. We are using Dell Compellent Storage and I created several read only replicated volumes at our DR site. I
am having issues failing over to the volumes after I use cluster cli to mount the read only volumes.
Any help would be appreciated greatly!

2008 R2 Multi-Site Cluster Possible without Third Party Software? I know it has been asked, but I haven't seen a specific answer. We are using Dell Compellent Storage and I created several read only replicated volumes at our DR site. I
am having issues failing over to the volumes after I use cluster cli to mount the read only volumes.
Any help would be appreciated greatly!
To have this working reliably you need to have 1) redundant and pretty fatty pipes between your sites (Primary and Disaster Recovery) and 2) your storage (Compellent in your case) being placed in third location. If you'll have both conditions met you'll
have decent performance and would avoid brain split issue when both sites would be up and uplink between sites is down. Good links on geo clustering:
Geo Cluster for Windows
http://clusteringformeremortals.com/2009/09/15/step-by-step-configuring-a-2-node-multi-site-cluster-on-windows-server-2008-r2-%E2%80%93-part-1/
Geo
Cluster for Windows 2008
http://blogs.technet.com/b/johnbaker/archive/2008/03/28/windows-server-2008-geo-clustering-multi-site-clustering.aspx
Geographically Dispersed Clustering
http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/
Hope this helped :)
StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

DirectAccess & Multi-Site (Windows Server 2012 R2)

Hello everyone,
Currently, I have a single working DirectAccess servers (Windows Server 2012 R2). Since I only have Windows 7 Enterprise clients, I'm using internal certificates. In short, this solution is working properly.
I'm interested in setting up Multi-Site and I have a couple of questions. From the research I've done, it looks like I'm going to need a publicly generated certificate for IP-HTTPS. According to some videos I've watched regarding Multi-Site configuration,
I should use a wildcard certificate.
Is this because this certificate must be loaded on two servers DirectAccess servers?
Our company domain is, say, mycompany.com - Will there be an issue if I get say,
*.directaccess.mycompany.com certificate? I just want to make sure that DirectAccess will handle this properly.
Thanks!

Hi,
>>If I purchase a multi-domain certificate and apply it to both DA servers, will this work?
According to the official document, certificate requirements for IP-HTTPS certificates:
For a single CA that issues SSL certificates that are installed on DirectAccess servers for IP-HTTPS connections:
In the Subject field, either an IPv4 address of the Internet interface of the site-specific DirectAccess server or the FQDN (recommended) of the IP-Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTPS) URL
In the Enhanced Key Usage field, the Server Authentication OID
In the CRL Distribution Points field, the organization-wide CRL distribution points on the Internet
For per-site CAs that issue SSL certificates that are installed on DirectAccess servers for IP-HTTPS connections:
In the Subject field, either an IPv4 address of the Internet interface of the site-specific DirectAccess server or the FQDN (recommended) of the IP-HTTPS URL
In the Enhanced Key Usage field, the Server Authentication OID
In the CRL Distribution Points field, the site-specific CRL distribution points on the Internet
The official document doesn't show that we can put the FQDN of the DA server into SAN, therefore it may not work.
Best Regards.
Steven Lee Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

SQL Server 2012 Multi-Site clustering with 2 nodes for HA and DR

Usually we setup 2 Node Prod cluster for Local HA and 1 or 2 Nodes in other data centre for DR
Given that we have an option to setup multi-site / multi-subnet clustering from SQL 2008 R2/2012. I am planning to use just 2 nodes, 1 in prod data centre and 1 in DR data centre with 2 or 3 instances. This will act as both HA and DR solution.
I would like to know if this solution is good, and any disadvantages, any best practices, etc.? By implementing this I can save some cost on physical servers.
Following will be configured:
* Will be using different subnets, quorum on different server with "Node and File Share Majority"
* All virtual IPs will be registered for virtual name, and Subnetdelay, Subnet threshold will be modified accordingly
* All nodes on same domain
* Use SAN Disk with replication to DR site

SQL 2008 R2 doesn't support multi-subnet clustering. You would still need 3rd party component like VLAN and Disk Replication. SQL 2012 is the first version to support multi-subnet clustering without using VLAN. you would still need disk replication hardware/software.
Taken from my book
Since nodes are often located in two different data centers at geographically dispersed locations, there is no shared storage between the nodes in a multi-site cluster. Clustering across two different data centers provides a higher level of availability and
protection at the storage level as we have more than a single copy of the data.
For SAN replication technology implemented in such clusters, the main activity is to keep data replicated between the sites. Typically, if we have nodes on two different sites, we would have two different network infrastructures and the nodes would be in
different subnets. In such cases, if we are on a SQL Server version before 2012, we need to use third party VLAN (Virtual LAN) technology so that one IP address travels between two sites. This is called wide-IP. Companies hesitate with this solution because
of the need to buy a third party solution to deploy the VLAN. Using VLAN technology means the same IP address would failover to the remote site in case of a local site disaster. Network administration might consider this as an overhead to maintenance and an
extra piece of the networking component that needs to be secure.
With SQL Server 2012 we do not need to use stretch VLAN technology but SAN replication is still needed for multi-site clustering. The OS version for this can be from Windows Server 2008 R2 and above. In this deployment, we can have a SQL virtual network
name having an “OR” dependency on two different IP addresses. One address would be representing each subnet. With the “OR” dependency, if IP1 or IP2 is online we just use the network name. This is one of the Enterprise Editions only features.
Other option which you can think of, without using 3rd party solutions would be AlwaysOn Availability Group. I have written details about it in my book.
Balmukund Lakhani | Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other users find a solution quicker
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
My Blog |
Team Blog | @Twitter
Author: SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn -
Paperback, Kindle

Directaccess and Multi-Site

Hello everyone,
I'm having an issue with my Directaccess implementation, allow me to give you a brief description of my DA infrastructure.
Originally I had a single DirectAccess server working properly, and configure for my Windows 7 users. That single server works perfectly. We decided to enable multi-site, and here's what's going on with this configuration.
SITE 1 - which includes my working DA server, it allows my Windows 7 & 8 clients to connect properly.
SITE 2 - which includes my new DA server, it's configured to allow only Windows 8 clients to connect, this one isn't working properly.
Problem: My test client, a Windows 8 Enterprise laptop, connects automatically to SITE 1 (I have access to all intranet resources), then I manually change sites to SITE 2 and here's when things break.
When I run get-DaConnectionStatus, I get NameResolutionFailure response. I'm unable to access any intranet resources.
One thing I noticed on the SITE 2 DA server Remote Client Status console, the client's device name shows up, but the authenticated username isn't showing there. The authenticated username does show up when I switch back to SITE 1 server.
I read several messages posted here, but those don't seem to apply to the issue I'm having.
I ran the
Any suggestions on how to go about this?
P.S. if it's of any help, I can upload the DAClient Troubleshooter logs that I have.

Okay, I've done more research and it looks like the issue with SITE 2 DA server is that is not resolving IPs. (This issue isn't present on the DA server for SITE 1)
From SITE 2 DA server, I'm able to ping intranet servers using their IPv6 address, but not their names.

CUA: One or more errors occurred while checking the status of Windows Firewall on the cluster nodes

Cluster with 2 hosts 2012 R2
Scheduled CAU fails with:
CAU run {4EFE116C-AB49-456D-8EED-F7EDC764DA49} on cluster Cluster1 failed. Error Message:One or more errors occurred while checking the status of Windows Firewall on the cluster nodes. Review the errors for more information on how to resolve the problems.
Error Code:-2146233088 Stack:   at MS.Internal.ClusterAwareUpdating.Util.<CheckFirewallsAsync>d__3a.MoveNext()
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at Microsoft.ClusterAwareUpdating.Commands.InvokeCauRunCommand.<_ProcessCluster>d__78.MoveNext()
If I run CAU "Analyze Readiness" ALL comes as PASS
If I run CUA by hand on same hosts with NO change to the system (not even reboot) it finishes OK
Anybody any ideas?
Thanks
Seb

Hi,
In some case if you disabled the connection in Windows firewall inbound of
"Cluster aware updating" service it will can’t use the CAU.
More information:
Starting with Cluster-Aware Updating: Self-Updating
http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2012/05/17/starting-with-cluster-aware-updating-self-updating.aspx
What is Cluster Aware Updating in Windows Server 2012? (Part 1)
http://blogs.technet.com/b/mspfe/archive/2013/02/06/what-is-cluster-aware-updating-in-windows-server-2012.aspx
Cluster-Aware Updating Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831694.aspx
Hope this helps.
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Exchange 2013 Multi Site Not SR/HA

This is the first time we have deployed a multi site Exchange organization. Here is the scenario and I am wondering if it is the correct one or if I should have done it a different way.
We have a VPN setup between our corporate location and a satellite campus. The satellite campus has it's own namespace and is a tree in our forest. We have Exchange 2013 SP1 setup at the corp location. We installed two Exchange 2013 SP1 servers
at the satellite location in that domain in the same Exchange organization. I was able to create a few linked users mailboxes (newly acquired and in process of user migration into our forest) and mail delivers between the two without issue. But
lately every new user will not receive email and they will be in the queue. Does not matter if the email is from a corp user or a local user on the same mailbox server.
We decided to do this because we want them to have all of their Exchange resources, email, CAS services and UM local to them, but they are still part of our system. I am having a hard time finding why this is happening. I also noticed that the emails
sent from one satellite user to another is actually going through the corp hub transport server and not their local. Sites and Services is setup with the correct subnets for each site. I have verified the send and receive connectors.
Is this scenario the best way to configure our organization or should we simply have created a second organization of their own and tried to share calendars, etc between the two? All of our other services are centrally located so it only made sense that
this should also work but before going live I wanted to see if this was the optimal way. This is not a high availability or site resiliency plan. No DAGs are used. We are just one company with two separate very remote disjoint locations and
even though we have a small VPN for services we would like to keep as much as possible local to that site.
I have not been able to find information on this scenario. Everything seems to point to SR/HA scenarios. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

You can't create a second organization when the domain is in the same forest, so you shouldn't have done that.
You're saying that SMTP messages are stuck in the queue? That can be caused by any number of problems, but my experience is that it is most likely one of the following. Look at the SMTP queue and see if any error code is listed, and post that
here.
1. In the main site, the site to which the messages are being sent, someone has modified the Default receive connector(s) in a way that the Exchange server can't connect. The most likely issues would be modifying the PermissionGroups or RemoteIPRanges
properties. Best practice is to not modify the Default receive connector (except maybe to add AnonymousUsers to the PermissionGroups to allow inbound mail), and instead create a new connector for the special purpose with the connection limitations supplied.
2. You have a firewall or relay device between the servers that's "helping" your SMTP connections (Cisco PIX firewalls are notorious for this, disable "SMTP Fixup") or breaking authentication. The servers must be able to connect on port 25 without
any molestation of the transactions.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Windows Extensions Not Showing After Windows Intune Site Role Installed

Hi,
I have installed the windows intune site role on a SCCM 2012 R2 box and the Windows Intune Extensions have not been shipped to Admin>Overview> Cloud Services> Windows Intune as per the attached photo. This is the third time I have built a
SCCM MDM service and I have not come across this before. If you view the site roles it is installed, the subscription is active within config manager and the system authority is set to SCCM management in Http://manage.microsoft.com.
I am wondering if there is a way of breaking the intune association to try and re-install the role as there was not a full internet connectivity within the data centers at the time if install and external DNS was not resolving for FQDN and nslookup would
fail. I believe that Intune requires a cert to be shipped to it at time of install.
Any help, thoughts and advice would be greatly received as my previous 2 installs have not been an issue.
Thanks in advance,
Nick

I am in the same boat and have a call open. Apparently, there is some issue that the engineering team is working on. I got the iOS and Email Profile extensions back in February, but never received the 8.1 extensions. My call has been
running for 3 weeks now and they are still working on the delivery mechanism from their end. I'll post back when they figure out what is going on.
Best, Jacob I'm a PC.

Problems with the windows update site in 32-bit Vista Business

Hi Everyone,
I am experiencing problems with the windows update site. As far as I know it shold make a link to the Windows Update module on-board and show the available updates after scanning. However, I get to the page that says "Checking if your computer has the latest version of Windows updating software for use with this website" and the next page I get is "The website has encountered a problem and cannot display the page you are trying to view". The error number is 0x80070002. I go to the knowledge base and delete the content of the Data Store folder as advised, but to no use at all. Active X controls are enabled Java is working fine. I've cleaned the register and everything, did a complete scan with Onecare as advised by Microsoft, which did not find anything but again the same error message. I am using KIS 2009 and I am sure I have no viruses or any other malware. I even tried to go to the update site with the KIS switched off but to no avail too. On the other hand I don't have problems with the automtic updates and when I run a manual update from the Update module everything is OK. Do you have any suggestion as to what might be the issue with the website updates?
P.S. I am using 32-bit Windows Vista Business on a Lenovo W500.

hello
You may be having a problem with the windows update agent.Since its a problem relating to windows update microsoft support personnel may help you out.follow this link and contact them by chat or email
http://support.microsoft.com/common/international.aspx?gprid=6527&acty=Start&ctl=Region&wf=Workflow&...
Cheers and regards,
• » νιנαｿѕαяα∂нι ѕαмανє∂αм ™ « •
●๋•کáŕádhí'ک díáŕý ツ
I am a volunteer here. I don't work for Lenovo

Should one use MPIO and/or CSV in a Windows 2012 R2 guest cluster?

Should one use MPIO and/or CSV in a Windows 2012 R2 guest cluster using VMware ESXi 5.5 presented Fiber LUN RDMs.
If MPIO were implemented is there a preference for HW manufacturer DISM vs. MS DISM in a guest cluster?
What partition size/offset is recommended for the MSR partition (currently set to 1000 MB) - unfortunately seeing storage validation error with failing block write at block 2048 (which in return may be related to VMware ESXi 5.5. disk partition layout)
The current setup works without using MPIO (question is would it help overcome the current failing persistent SCSI-3 reservation warning.)
What were the benefit of using CSV if any in a guest cluster? The Luns in scope would eventually hold SQL data and log files.
Thanks for your input already.
Sassan Karai

Hi,
Regardless of what type of the shared storage is failover cluster have to use the shared storage, the shared storage can redirect the failed node data to others node, accordingly
the failover cluster can get the high availability.
From you descripted error there must you choose the VMware® unsupported storage with failover cluster, please refer the following VMware® official KB then reconfirm your topology
design is supported.
Third party KB:
VMware vSphere support for Microsoft clustering solutions on VMware products
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1037959
The related KB:
Failover Clustering Hardware Requirements and Storage Options
http://technet.microsoft.com/zh-cn/library/jj612869.aspx
More information:
Validate Storage Spaces Persistent Reservation Test Results with Warning
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/clustering/archive/2013/05/24/10421247.aspx
Understanding Cluster Validation Tests: Storage
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771259.aspx#PersistentReservation
Shared storage for Windows Failover Cluster with MPIO
http://blogs.technet.com/b/storageserver/archive/2011/05/31/shared-storage-for-windows-failover-cluster-with-mpio.aspx
Hope this helps.
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

A doozy: DWCS5, WordPress 3.0 Multi Site, XAMPP: File discovery problems

Just trying to get the related files function working properly.
This is on a fresh local install of WordPress 3.0 beta 2, multi site activated using subdomains.
It keeps insisting my testing server has the wrong settings even though both Live View and Live Code are working without a hitch.
I set the local folder and testing folder to point to the same location. The files bar is even able to pick up a few links such as my scripts and the theme's css file, but none of the core WP files.
Any suggestions? (Aside from using subdirectories? Client is adamant about subdomains.)

Hi Adam
Can you send us a bug report so we can get more details on your setup?:
http://www.adobe.com/go/wish
Thanks,
David Alcala
Dreamweaver QE

IMovie files in Windows iCloud site?

Hello everyone , i wanted to ask ; is it possible to upload videos I've made in iMovie in the iCloud Drive ? Ive done that but when i go to to the iCloud site i don't see any iMovie file in iCloud Drive . I will go vacations and ill need to keep my youtube channel up , and i will have my windows pc only , so i have prepared some videos that i don't want to upload right now cause they are not in the last editing phase yet . So is it possible to open an iMovie file via Windows' iCloud site , in the iCloud drive section ?

They should be viewable using QuickTime Player or editable using Movie Maker.

Deploy Exchange 2013 Edge Transport Server for multi-site environment

Hi,
I have a multi-site Exchange 2013 environment. The configurations are as below.
Active Directory Sites and Exchange Servers.
SiteA - EXMB1 & EXCAS1
SiteB - EXMB2 & EXCAS2
SiteC - EXMB3 & EXCAS3
All sites are connected via VPN. (Good speed. No latency issues)
All the three Mailbox Servers are in DAG. Only one mailbox database. All servers running Exchange 2013.
I am planning to deploy Edge Servers in the infrastructure (I am doing it for the first time). Normally, it will be in DMZ.
Now, I can deploy 2 Edge Servers for reliability.
Question.
1. Can I deploy 2 Edge Servers and create subscription to all the mailbox server in 3 different site? Or, is it like one edge server can make subscription to only mailbox servers in one Active Directory Site? I am not sure about this and could not find much
information from TechNet.
One Edge Server can make subscription to all 3 mailbox server in 3 sites. Similarly, I can make the subscriptions in the second edge server as well. Configure 2 external MX records with the same priority so that there will be some load balancing.
Also, in such a case if the mailbox database become active from a different site, I need not make any new changes to the Edge Servers right?
2. If the first way is not correct, I will have to deploy 1 Edge Server each for each of the Active Directory Site. (In DMZ only, not in domain)
Make Edge Subscription to the mailbox server in corresponding site.
Make 1 MX record and point it to the Edge Server which is subscribed to the Mailbox Server from which the Database is Active. The problem is, every time will have to change the DNS record when ever the database copy is activated from a different mailbox
server. And the issues with propagation.. delay..
I am not sure which of the above 2 ways will work. Appreciate suggestions from anyone who have previous experience with similar infrastructure.
Thanks in advance. :)

Hi
One or more Edge Transport servers can be subscribed to a single Active Directory site. However, an Edge Transport server can't be subscribed to more than one Active Directory site. If you have more than one Edge Transport server deployed, each server can be
subscribed to a different Active Directory site. Each Edge Transport server requires an individual Edge Subscription.
A subscribed Edge Transport server is associated with a particular Active Directory site. If more than one Mailbox server exists in the site, any of them can replicate data to the subscribed Edge Transport servers.
I don't think there is a solution to subscribe edge servers for more than 1 site. Edge Servers can be scoped only to one site.
Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on http://exchangequery.com Thanks Sathish
(MVP)

Reader 11 / Windows Trusted Sites

Hello everyone
I'm trying to configure Adobe Reader to recognize my Windows Trusted Sites so I can enable the protected view for all documents. In the internet options security zone "trusted sites" I already added my fileserver. (file://fs001)
I can't get Adobe Reader to deal with this setting and I don't know why. The "automatically trust sites from my Win OS security zones" checkbox is activated but it won't work at all. It works if I add de location (\\fs001) through the GUI of Adobe Reader. Without this entry I always get the yellow bar on the top.
Can someone help me with this Problem?
Thank you

Hi Team,
Need your urgent help
Could you confirm Automatically trust sites for Windows OS security zones to add the sites through GPO
I have checked Adobe Reader GPO templates but its not exists?
Pls assist

Windows Multi Site/Geo Cluster

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for