Windows server 2003 PDC DNS issues

Cannot view the company website internally. But it shows up normally outside of the network. The old website worked fine inside and out but new website hosted by godaddy cannot be seen internally.

These ones may help.
http://forums.iis.net/t/1215056.aspx?Unable+to+get+to+web+sites+from+inside+network
http://forums.iis.net/t/1153849.aspx?website+address+pointing+to+internal+network
also try asking the IIS experts over here.
http://forums.iis.net/
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

Similar Messages

  • Windows Server 2008 AD & DNS issue

    Hi Guys,
    I have an Server 2008 ADDS enviroment with this DC-s:
    "List of domain controllers with accounts in the domain:
    WTEHU001 (powered off)
    WTEHU003 (powered off)
    ZEUS
    MINERVA
    GYAL-DC1
    The command completed successfully."
    When I change from google dns (8.8.8.8) to local DNS address (127.0.0.1) on DNS entries of NIC of Server, I get error messages:
    "The DNS server is waiting for Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) to signal that the initial synchronization of the directory has been completed. The DNS server service cannot start until the initial synchronization is complete because critical
    DNS data might not yet be replicated onto this domain controller"
    DNS service is unavailable on this situation.
    With google DNS on server's NIC, local DNS service is available and nslookup is working on local machines:
    "nslookup zeus
    Kiszolgáló:  zeus.wtehu.local
    Address:  10.31.7.6
    Név:     zeus.wtehu.local"
    But, I get this error message with "dcdiag /test:dns"
    Directory Server Diagnosis
    Performing initial setup:
       Trying to find home server...
       Home Server = ZEUS
       * Identified AD Forest.
       Done gathering initial info.
    Doing initial required tests
       Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\ZEUS
          Starting test: Connectivity
             The host 57650e4a-f396-4929-92f0-cf1adb2bba95._msdcs.wtehu.local could
             not be resolved to an IP address. Check the DNS server, DHCP, server
             name, etc.
             Got error while checking LDAP and RPC connectivity. Please check your
             firewall settings.
             ......................... ZEUS failed test Connectivity
    Doing primary tests
       Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\ZEUS
          Starting test: DNS
             DNS Tests are running and not hung. Please wait a few minutes...
             ......................... ZEUS passed test DNS
       Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
       Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
       Running partition tests on : Schema
       Running partition tests on : Configuration
       Running partition tests on : wtehu
       Running enterprise tests on : wtehu.local
          Starting test: DNS
             Test results for domain controllers:
                DC: ZEUS.wtehu.local
                Domain: wtehu.local
                   TEST: Basic (Basc)
                      Error: No LDAP connectivity
                      Warning: adapter
                      [00000008] Broadcom BCM5716C NetXtreme II GigE (NDIS VBD Client)
                      has invalid DNS server: 8.8.8.8 (<name unavailable>)
                      Error: all DNS servers are invalid
                      No host records (A or AAAA) were found for this DC
                   TEST: Delegations (Del)
                      Error: DNS server: wtehu001.wtehu.local. IP:10.31.7.200
                      [Broken delegated domain _msdcs.wtehu.local.]
                   TEST: Dynamic update (Dyn)
                      Warning: Failed to add the test record dcdiag-test-record in zone wtehu.local
                TEST: Records registration (RReg)
                   Error: Record registrations cannot be found for all the network
                   adapters
             Summary of test results for DNS servers used by the above domain
             controllers:
                DNS server: 8.8.8.8 (<name unavailable>)
                   2 test failure on this DNS server
                   Name resolution is not functional. _ldap._tcp.wtehu.local. failed on the DNS server 8.8.8.8
                DNS server: 10.31.7.200 (wtehu001.wtehu.local.)
                   1 test failure on this DNS server
                   PTR record query for the 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa. failed on the DNS server 10.31.7.200              
             Summary of DNS test results:
                                                Auth Basc Forw Del  Dyn  RReg Ext
                Domain: wtehu.local
                   ZEUS                         PASS FAIL PASS FAIL WARN FAIL n/a  
             ......................... wtehu.local failed test DNSs
    Replication test output:
    Repadmin: running command /showrepl against full DC localhost
    Default-First-Site-Name\ZEUS
    DSA Options: IS_GC
    Site Options: (none)
    DSA object GUID: 57650e4a-f396-4929-92f0-cf1adb2bba95
    DSA invocationID: 20c20b47-dcb3-437b-a316-b0639f90b753
    ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ======================================
    DC=wtehu,DC=local
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:29 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            23 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 10:07:35.
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:11 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            345 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 10:15:23.
        Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:17 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            302 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 10:33:17.
        Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
            DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:52:05 was successful.
    CN=Configuration,DC=wtehu,DC=local
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:35 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            23 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:07.
        Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:41 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            29 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:47 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            30 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:07.
        Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
            DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:47 was successful.
    CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=wtehu,DC=local
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:53 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            23 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
        Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
            DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:53 was successful.
        Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:59 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            24 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:05 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
                The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
            24 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
    DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=wtehu,DC=local
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:29 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
                The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
            23 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:58:05.
        Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:41 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
                The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
            42 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:57:52.
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:47 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
                The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
            43 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:58:07.
        Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
            DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:17 was successful.
    DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=wtehu,DC=local
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:29 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
                The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
            23 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
        Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:41 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
                The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
            25 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
        Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
            DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:47 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
                The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
            25 consecutive failure(s).
            Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
        Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
            DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
            Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:17 was successful.
    DsReplicaGetInfo() failed with status 8453 (0x2105):
        Replication access was denied.
    DsReplicaGetInfo() failed with status 8453 (0x2105):
        Replication access was denied.
    Regards,
    Gabor

    Public DNS servers should not be used in IP settings of DCs. You need to configure them as forwarders instead. Also, I would recommend using your ISP DNS servers instead of Google ones.
    For the recommendation of IP settings to be used on DCs, please refer to what is written in this Wiki article: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18513.active-directory-replication-issues-basic-troubleshooting-steps-single-ad-domain-in-a-single-ad-forest.aspx
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Get Active Directory User Last Logon
    Create an Active Directory test domain similar to the production one
    Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part I
    Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part II
    Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part III
    Reset Active Directory user password

  • Windows Server 2003 x64 IIS Issue

    To All,
    I have recently installed IIS on my Windows 2003 x64 Server and I am encountering the "%1 is not a valid Win32 application."  error message when I attempt to register my website.
    These are the troubleshooting tasks that I had performed so far without any success:
    1). Downloaded and installed both dotnetfix.exe & NetFx64.exe Redistribution files from the Microsoft site.
    Please view the pasted screen-shot of my current IIS configurations in the Web Service Extensions below.
    Bob. 
    Robert Brindle. MCSE, MCSA & MCP/Cisco CCNP & CCNA.

    This one may help.
    http://forums.asp.net/t/983377.aspx?+is+not+a+valid+Win32+application+Exception+from+HRESULT+0x800700C1+
    or I'd ask them over here.
    Microsoft IIS forums
    Regards, Dave Patrick ....
    Microsoft Certified Professional
    Microsoft MVP [Windows]
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

  • Windows Server 2003 file share issues - on wifi directory changes to root automatically

    I have this strange issue and it ONLY happens on wifi.  
    If I browse to windows share: \\hpdsfandp\common$\folder1\folder2 - within seconds explorer changes the directory back to \\hpdsfandp\common$
    *this does not happen if I'm on ethernet
    *this does not happen if I go to a different server (eg) \\etdb2\c$\folder1
    I tried diff wireless access points and it happens on both.  Sometimes the issue goes away but then comes back the next day
    I did run wireshark on the client and I got a few errors:
    ERROR (SMB):  NT Status: STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE
    ERROR (SMB):  NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND 

    Hi,
    Please check the following 2 group policy settings:
    1. Make sure you do not have the policy configured in User Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> System ->  User Profiles -> Connect home directory to root of the share.
    2. Set the Group Policy setting under Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> System ->  Logon -> Always wait for the network at computer startup and logon to Enabled.
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Windows Server 2003 and CS3

    I'm looking to purchase either Photoshop CS3 or the Creative Suite CS3, but the only operating system I have available is an in-house development server running Windows Server 2003.
    I used to run Photoshop 5.5 on Windows Server 2003 without an issue, I wanted to make sure version CS3 will also run on this OS. I know the system requirements say otherwise, but as I said I had it installed on a server OS before with out any issues.
    Thanks.
    K Wilder

    Search here and the Creative Suite forum for Windows 2003. It's been
    discussed.
    You'll have to hack the installer and then you'll be in completely
    unsupported territory.
    Bob

  • Issues with creating PDF's (Acrobat 8.1.6. and 9.1.3) in Windows Server 2003 (32 bit) and Windows XP (64bit)

    We have a report package that generates customised reports
    We generate the PDF's by simply "printing" to the Adobe PDF printer
    In Windows XP Pro (32 Bit) the report creates the PDF perfectly
    In Windows Server 2003 (32 Bit) or Windows Xp Pro (64 Bit) the PDF is created 90% perfect but some of text has slipped on the page.
    Whilst we are looking into the report writer (Dev Express) I would like to rule out any Acrobat issues.
    With thanks
    Mark

    I think it will work fine if you use the "Enterprise" authentication option.  It may have dependencies on 32 bit components.  So, that's why we must run IIS in 32 bit mode even though it's on a 64 bit OS.  That means CR supports 64 bit OS systems only if you bring down other components that CR uses to 32 bit levels.  I'm not sure if that is considered "full support". 
    We are trying to use the LDAP authentication option, but that tab is disabled.  Other tabs such as Active Directory and WinNT are disabled as well.  There maybe another component that we must bring down to 32 bit processing.
    Is there a way to enable the LDAP authentication configuration tab?
    thanks

  • Tuxedo Memory Leak Issue (Tuxedo 8.1 - Windows Server 2003)

    Hi
    We are running tuxedo 8.1, 32 bit with patch level 258 in our windows server 2003 based production environment. We are currently facing an issue where the memory usage of machine slowly keeps on going higher and higher eventually resulting in “Memory Allocation Failure” to tuxedo servers. We then have to do a complete restart of tuxedo which stabilizes the system for other few days.
    We have been analyzing the our source code in development/test environment using different tools like a customized Alzheimer tool and IBM purify but both tools reported no memory leaks. We then developed a test tuxedo server exposing a tuxedo service which simply allocates a memory to a response buffer and then returns the response buffer. I then configured tuxedo queue with same name “MEMTEST3” and configured a TMQForward server to call this “MEMTEST3” service every time a message is en-queued to the MEMTEST3 queue.
    unsigned long _LIBENTRY ulTPAlloc(FBFR32 **ppc, long size)
    unsigned long ulRes = MSG_SUCCESS_c;
    ppc = (FBFR32 ) tpalloc("FML32", (char *) 0, size);
    if (*ppc == (FBFR32 *) 0) {
    vLogMessage(hGetLogHandle(), MSG_MEM_ALLOC_ERR_c, (char *) 0, (Event_t *) 0,
    BM_NOSUPPRESS_c, size);
    ulRes = MSG_MEM_ALLOC_ERR_c;
    return (ulRes);
    /*==============================================================================
    Service MEMTEST2
    ==============================================================================*/
    void MEMTEST3(TPSVCINFO *pRequest)
    FBFR32 *pFmlResponse = NULL;
    FBFR32 *pFml = NULL;
    unsigned long ulRes = MSG_SUCCESS_c;
    unsigned long ulActionCode = 0;
    int iExitValue = 0;
    long lTpurcode = 0;
    FBFR32 *pFmlNULL = NULL;
    userlog("Starting MEMTEST3 service.");
    if (pRequest == NULL || pRequest->data == NULL)
    vLogMessage(hGetLogHandle(), MSG_API_ARGS_ERR_c, NULL, NULL, BM_NOSUPPRESS_c);
    ulRes = MSG_API_ARGS_ERR_c;
    else
    pFml = (FBFR32 *) pRequest->data;
    userlog("MEMTEST3: GET THE MEM");
    ulRes = ulTPAlloc(&pFmlResponse, 1024);
    userlog("Ending MEMTEST3 service.");
    tpreturn( iExitValue, lTpurcode, ( char * ) pFmlResponse , 0L, 0L );
    While I was en-queuing the messages to the queue, I kept on monitoring the memory usage of the server hosting the service. What I observed was that I saw an initial hike in the usage of memory of the server followed by small jumps in memory increase. I kept on monitoring the server for a long time and the memory was never returned. What I suspect is that there is memory leak in tuxedo TMQforward process as it never released the memory allocated in the service.
    Can anyone help how this situation can be avoided ?
    Kind Regards,
    Asim

    Hi Todd,
    Also as well as my previous question, I also found your reply to another user posting something similar at Re: Memory leaks in Tuxedo libraries
    You mention that:
    In general Tuxedo will free anything it allocates, although there are cases where memory is allocated and not freed because:
    +1) it is one time or a fixed number of times allocations that will not continue to grow, and freeing up the memory just before exiting isn't of any benefit.+
    +2) the memory is under Tuxedo's memory management functions where we manage our own look aside lists to provide better buffer allocation performance and again freeing these before process termination is of little benefit.+
    Our code does only issue TPALLOC once and then a TPRETURN - could point (1) of your comment above also be something of concern to us, where we would observe a continuous growth of memory usage?
    I know it may sound like a stupid question but do we need to run our code 20,000 times before memory gets freed?
    Kind Regards,
    Asim

  • About memory issue during installing Oracle 11g on Windows Server 2003

    Hi, all
    When I installed Oracle 11g on Windows Server 2003 which the server is a virtual server, Oracle only can detect 2G memory.
    But there are 4G memory with my server.
    I want to know if the Oracle 11g's new feature or the virtual server lead the issue.
    Also , I want to get your help to resolve the issue, thanks a lot.

    Let me get this straight:
    You have created some virtual machine using someone's unknown VM software.
    You have installed Windows Server 2003 (perhaps, but not confirmed 32-bit) to that VM.
    You have allocated 4GB of memory to the VM (we guess ... not sure I'm ready to take your word on this)
    You are attempting to install Oracle 11g (presumably 11gR1 32 bit for Windows) in the VM
    And the Oracle (installer?) seems to be reporting that you only have 2GB RAM.
    Since I personally have installed Oracle 11g 32bit for Windows on Windows 2003 server with 4GB RAM and had no issues, I would be investigating the (unknown) VM environment.

  • User-changeable Passwords issue f/ ACS 4.0 on Windows Server 2003

    I am having an issue with the UCP website not functioning correctly. I have installed it from the ACS 4.0 CD, following the instructions from the Cisco.com website, but cannot get past the Login page. Users can get to the Login page, but after they enter their information (username / password) and click Login, the server returns the following error page: "CGI Error. The apecified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers."
    I cannot get past this page. I have verified that the website is installed as outlined in the Cisco procedure, and have re-installed twice to verify. I have granted Everyone Write and Execute permissions to the site directories, and granted the Virtual Directories Script and Executable access.
    Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. I am evaluating ACS 4.0 for deployment in our company, and UCP not working is a major stumbling block.
    Additional configuration information:
    Windows Server 2003 SP1, patched current to 8/29/06
    The ACS server is also running on this server; it was installed and tested first, before installing UCP.
    Thanks,
    John

    Change the user that runs CSusercgi.exe to Administrator.Refer the following steps Install UCP 4 on a machine that runs IIS server,Open IIS manager,Locate Default Web Site, Double click on the virtual name 'securecgi-bin',Right click on CSusercgi.exe and choose Properties,Choose 'File Security' tab,Choose 'Edit' in 'Authentication and access control' area,Change username from IUSR_ to 'Administrator' and enter his password.

  • Directory Security Strange Permissions Issues (Windows Server 2003 running Active Directory)

    I have a user that all of a sudden was not able to open 70% of her files located on a file server, Windows Server 2003 running Active Directory, from her laptop. The same user can access all the same files from a different machine, logging on with the same
    credentials. Just looking for a point in the right direction and a possible theory as what could cause this problem, an why all of a sudden. I did go back through the logs but nothing sticks out. For the most part the logs on the server and the laptop are
    pretty clean. 
    Both machines are Latitude E5420s running Windows 7 Enterprise Service Pack 1. Both machines are 64bit and connect to the network via hard-wire, not wireless.
    Thanks in advanced.
    Grajek

    I would recommend proceeding that way:
    Check that your DCs are in a healthy state and AD replication is fine: It might be that the user is member of security groups and the membership is not getting replicated properly which can cause this random behavior. You can use
    dcdiag and repadmin for checks and you can refer to my recommendations here: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18513.active-directory-replication-issues-basic-troubleshooting-steps-single-ad-domain-in-a-single-ad-forest.aspx
    Make  sure that the file server is reachable from the user client computer. Start with
    ping and nslookup. Also, you need to make sure that the traffic between the client and the server is not blocked or filtered. You might want to temporary disable security software for testing
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • Windows server 2012 as primary DC and DNS server and windows server 2003 as secondary DC and DNS

    Migration from windows server 2003 AD DC and DNS server to windows server 2012 R2,
    Cannot I set up Windows server 2012 R2 as primary DC and DNS  , windows server 2003 as secondary DC and DNS ? (for backup server when server 2012 fail, user can continue to login and access internet services)

    You can mix both as long as your Forest and Domain Functional level are Windows Server 2003. However, I would like to bring your attention to this blog about known problems when mixing DCs with Windows Server 2003 and 2012 R2 OS:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2014/07/23/it-turns-out-that-weird-things-can-happen-when-you-mix-windows-server-2003-and-windows-server-2012-r2-domain-controllers.aspx
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • Windows Serve 2003 Paging Issue

    Hi All,
    We have one windows server 2003 enterprise edition with good CPU power & 24 GB of physical memory.
    Since last few days weeks. This server becomes non-responsive with large number of event id 50 & 51. We can't access this system when this happens & someone need to go & hard reboot the system.
    Assumes this is something related to memory leak from some application but didn't find the exact trace for that.
    Any way to narrow down  this trace.
    Thanks,
    Sandesh

    Hi sandeshgawade87,
    Did you install the following Hotfix:
    Some data is corrupted when cached and noncached I/O operations occur by using the same NTFS file handle
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981166
    From the event ID, it also can caused by the hardware issue, please check your storage hardware related system.
    The related KB:
    Information about Event ID 51
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244780
    Windows System Event Log Errors that indicate possible I/O problems can be associated with database inconsistency or performance problems for SQL Server
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2091098
    I’m glad to be of help to you!
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • I am trying to remote into a Windows Server 2003 from a Windows 7 machine and having issues

    I am trying to remote into a Windows Server 2003 from a Windows 7 machine.  It says "The terminal server has exceeded the maximum number of allowed connections".
    My first stop in trying to solve this problem was here:
    [URL="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows/command-line-hack-for-terminal-server-has-exceeded-the-maximum-number-of-allowed-connections/"]howtogeek.com[/URL]
    And it says:
    [I]
    [INDENT]This problem happens because Windows only allows two remote terminal services connections when you are in administrative mode, and you’ve either got two people already on that server, or more likely, you’ve got a disconnected session that still thinks
    it is active.
    The problem with this error is that you have to actually get on the server console to fix the problem if the server isn’t in a domain. ([B]If you are in a domain, then just open Terminal Services Manager and log off or disconnect the sessions[/B])[/INDENT][/I]
    So it seems to suggest that all I have to do really is to run the  Terminal Services Manager but I cannot find it.
    This web site from mssqltips.com [URL="http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1981/remote-desktop-error-terminal-server-has-exceeded-the-maximum-number-of-allowed-connections/"](click here)[/URL] says all I need to do is first execute "mstsc /
    admin" from the command line.  But, when I do that, I get a message when I try to remote to the server, that says this: "To log on to this remote console session, you must have administrative permissions on this computer".
    So, what now?  What do you suggest?

    Hi Bobby,
    Yes, it is by design. By default, Windows Server only accepts two concurrent administrative sessions (Administrative Mode). It means that only two administrators can work on the server at
    the same time.
    If you would like more concurrent sessions, you need to purchase RDS CALs, install Terminal Services related server roles with proper configurations on the server.
    Remote Desktop for Administration (server 2003)
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc785186(v=ws.10).aspx
    What Is Terminal Services?
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc782486(v=ws.10).aspx
    Terminal Services Configuration
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc787078(v=ws.10).aspx
    Purchase client access licenses
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3660ac5a-7468-48d3-b7e8-5529de8fb6c5
    Thanks.
    Jeremy Wu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Issues while weblogic 10.3.5 on 64 windows server 2003 R2

    Hi,
    I'm trying to configure weblogic in 64 bits windows server 2003 R2.
    1.First, I installed 64 bit jdk.
    2. Installed weblogic server(64 bit)
    3. insalled ADR 11.1.1.5 with jdk path done in the first step.
    4. Applied patch no : 12611176 (sherman patch)through opatch.
    5. then try to upgradeADF from 'E:\oracle\WlsStandalone\oracle_common\common\bin\wlst.cmd', i'm getting following error :
    wls:/offline> upgradeADF('E:\oracle\WlsStandalone\user_projects\domains\adf_domain')
    Traceback (innermost last):
    File "<console>", line 1, in ?
    NameError: upgradeADF
    wls:/offline>
    6. After this i tried to apply second patch 12556632, this also failure.
    Thanks in advance,
    SAN

    are you following the steps mentioned in the Opatch readme file, it will tell the way to upgrade, and it shows the prerequiestes also

  • Issues when Sharepoint Services 3.0 OS upgraded from windows server 2003 standard to windows server 2003 enterprise

    In my sharepoint 2007, I have upgraded the OS from windows server 2003 standard to windows server 2003 enterprise R2 SP2. After the OS upgrade when I run the central admin it's showing this error "Microsoft Windows Sharepoint Services 3.0 Error 2908
    error has occurred" screen shot below of the error. 
    Any help?

    Not sure I can help.  In general MS does NOT support the upgrade of the Underlying OS without re-installing SharePoint.  Many of the prerequisites that were installed when SharePoint was installed are OS specific.  You can either contact
    Product Support and see if they can provide any assistance or re-install SharePoint from scratch and re-attach/migrate all the existing databases with content into the new system on the new OS.
    Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
    Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
    Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
    Twitter: Follow @pstork
    Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

Maybe you are looking for