Windows server 2003 PDC DNS issues
Cannot view the company website internally. But it shows up normally outside of the network. The old website worked fine inside and out but new website hosted by godaddy cannot be seen internally.
These ones may help.
http://forums.iis.net/t/1215056.aspx?Unable+to+get+to+web+sites+from+inside+network
http://forums.iis.net/t/1153849.aspx?website+address+pointing+to+internal+network
also try asking the IIS experts over here.
http://forums.iis.net/
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Similar Messages
-
Windows Server 2008 AD & DNS issue
Hi Guys,
I have an Server 2008 ADDS enviroment with this DC-s:
"List of domain controllers with accounts in the domain:
WTEHU001 (powered off)
WTEHU003 (powered off)
ZEUS
MINERVA
GYAL-DC1
The command completed successfully."
When I change from google dns (8.8.8.8) to local DNS address (127.0.0.1) on DNS entries of NIC of Server, I get error messages:
"The DNS server is waiting for Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) to signal that the initial synchronization of the directory has been completed. The DNS server service cannot start until the initial synchronization is complete because critical
DNS data might not yet be replicated onto this domain controller"
DNS service is unavailable on this situation.
With google DNS on server's NIC, local DNS service is available and nslookup is working on local machines:
"nslookup zeus
Kiszolgáló: zeus.wtehu.local
Address: 10.31.7.6
Név: zeus.wtehu.local"
But, I get this error message with "dcdiag /test:dns"
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
Home Server = ZEUS
* Identified AD Forest.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\ZEUS
Starting test: Connectivity
The host 57650e4a-f396-4929-92f0-cf1adb2bba95._msdcs.wtehu.local could
not be resolved to an IP address. Check the DNS server, DHCP, server
name, etc.
Got error while checking LDAP and RPC connectivity. Please check your
firewall settings.
......................... ZEUS failed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\ZEUS
Starting test: DNS
DNS Tests are running and not hung. Please wait a few minutes...
......................... ZEUS passed test DNS
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Running partition tests on : Schema
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Running partition tests on : wtehu
Running enterprise tests on : wtehu.local
Starting test: DNS
Test results for domain controllers:
DC: ZEUS.wtehu.local
Domain: wtehu.local
TEST: Basic (Basc)
Error: No LDAP connectivity
Warning: adapter
[00000008] Broadcom BCM5716C NetXtreme II GigE (NDIS VBD Client)
has invalid DNS server: 8.8.8.8 (<name unavailable>)
Error: all DNS servers are invalid
No host records (A or AAAA) were found for this DC
TEST: Delegations (Del)
Error: DNS server: wtehu001.wtehu.local. IP:10.31.7.200
[Broken delegated domain _msdcs.wtehu.local.]
TEST: Dynamic update (Dyn)
Warning: Failed to add the test record dcdiag-test-record in zone wtehu.local
TEST: Records registration (RReg)
Error: Record registrations cannot be found for all the network
adapters
Summary of test results for DNS servers used by the above domain
controllers:
DNS server: 8.8.8.8 (<name unavailable>)
2 test failure on this DNS server
Name resolution is not functional. _ldap._tcp.wtehu.local. failed on the DNS server 8.8.8.8
DNS server: 10.31.7.200 (wtehu001.wtehu.local.)
1 test failure on this DNS server
PTR record query for the 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa. failed on the DNS server 10.31.7.200
Summary of DNS test results:
Auth Basc Forw Del Dyn RReg Ext
Domain: wtehu.local
ZEUS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL WARN FAIL n/a
......................... wtehu.local failed test DNSs
Replication test output:
Repadmin: running command /showrepl against full DC localhost
Default-First-Site-Name\ZEUS
DSA Options: IS_GC
Site Options: (none)
DSA object GUID: 57650e4a-f396-4929-92f0-cf1adb2bba95
DSA invocationID: 20c20b47-dcb3-437b-a316-b0639f90b753
==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ======================================
DC=wtehu,DC=local
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:29 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
23 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 10:07:35.
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:11 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
345 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 10:15:23.
Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:17 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
302 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 10:33:17.
Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:52:05 was successful.
CN=Configuration,DC=wtehu,DC=local
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:35 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
23 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:07.
Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:41 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
29 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:47 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
30 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:07.
Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:47 was successful.
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=wtehu,DC=local
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:53 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
23 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:53 was successful.
Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:59 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
24 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:05 failed, result 8524 (0x214c):
The DSA operation is unable to proceed because of a DNS lookup failure.
24 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=wtehu,DC=local
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:29 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
23 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:58:05.
Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:41 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
42 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:57:52.
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:47 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
43 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:58:07.
Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:17 was successful.
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=wtehu,DC=local
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU001 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 5a8cc029-a880-44c1-b3e3-92961fd4d74d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:29 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
23 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
Default-First-Site-Name\GYAL-DC1 via RPC
DSA object GUID: c006625c-244b-4710-a55e-812a764a019b
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:41 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
25 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
Default-First-Site-Name\WTEHU003 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 7559995a-cd48-4d43-972e-1492f4c56fd4
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:46:47 failed, result 1256 (0x4e8):
The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
25 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ 2014-01-04 09:53:08.
Default-First-Site-Name\MINERVA via RPC
DSA object GUID: ad0ee6cf-2f73-4b98-80c3-2cd4693d749d
Last attempt @ 2014-01-05 09:47:17 was successful.
DsReplicaGetInfo() failed with status 8453 (0x2105):
Replication access was denied.
DsReplicaGetInfo() failed with status 8453 (0x2105):
Replication access was denied.
Regards,
GaborPublic DNS servers should not be used in IP settings of DCs. You need to configure them as forwarders instead. Also, I would recommend using your ISP DNS servers instead of Google ones.
For the recommendation of IP settings to be used on DCs, please refer to what is written in this Wiki article: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18513.active-directory-replication-issues-basic-troubleshooting-steps-single-ad-domain-in-a-single-ad-forest.aspx
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Get Active Directory User Last Logon
Create an Active Directory test domain similar to the production one
Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part I
Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part II
Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part III
Reset Active Directory user password -
Windows Server 2003 x64 IIS Issue
To All,
I have recently installed IIS on my Windows 2003 x64 Server and I am encountering the "%1 is not a valid Win32 application." error message when I attempt to register my website.
These are the troubleshooting tasks that I had performed so far without any success:
1). Downloaded and installed both dotnetfix.exe & NetFx64.exe Redistribution files from the Microsoft site.
Please view the pasted screen-shot of my current IIS configurations in the Web Service Extensions below.
Bob.
Robert Brindle. MCSE, MCSA & MCP/Cisco CCNP & CCNA.This one may help.
http://forums.asp.net/t/983377.aspx?+is+not+a+valid+Win32+application+Exception+from+HRESULT+0x800700C1+
or I'd ask them over here.
Microsoft IIS forums
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights. -
Windows Server 2003 file share issues - on wifi directory changes to root automatically
I have this strange issue and it ONLY happens on wifi.
If I browse to windows share: \\hpdsfandp\common$\folder1\folder2 - within seconds explorer changes the directory back to \\hpdsfandp\common$
*this does not happen if I'm on ethernet
*this does not happen if I go to a different server (eg) \\etdb2\c$\folder1
I tried diff wireless access points and it happens on both. Sometimes the issue goes away but then comes back the next day
I did run wireshark on the client and I got a few errors:
ERROR (SMB): NT Status: STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE
ERROR (SMB): NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUNDHi,
Please check the following 2 group policy settings:
1. Make sure you do not have the policy configured in User Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> System -> User Profiles -> Connect home directory to root of the share.
2. Set the Group Policy setting under Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> System -> Logon -> Always wait for the network at computer startup and logon to Enabled.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected] -
I'm looking to purchase either Photoshop CS3 or the Creative Suite CS3, but the only operating system I have available is an in-house development server running Windows Server 2003.
I used to run Photoshop 5.5 on Windows Server 2003 without an issue, I wanted to make sure version CS3 will also run on this OS. I know the system requirements say otherwise, but as I said I had it installed on a server OS before with out any issues.
Thanks.
K WilderSearch here and the Creative Suite forum for Windows 2003. It's been
discussed.
You'll have to hack the installer and then you'll be in completely
unsupported territory.
Bob -
We have a report package that generates customised reports
We generate the PDF's by simply "printing" to the Adobe PDF printer
In Windows XP Pro (32 Bit) the report creates the PDF perfectly
In Windows Server 2003 (32 Bit) or Windows Xp Pro (64 Bit) the PDF is created 90% perfect but some of text has slipped on the page.
Whilst we are looking into the report writer (Dev Express) I would like to rule out any Acrobat issues.
With thanks
MarkI think it will work fine if you use the "Enterprise" authentication option. It may have dependencies on 32 bit components. So, that's why we must run IIS in 32 bit mode even though it's on a 64 bit OS. That means CR supports 64 bit OS systems only if you bring down other components that CR uses to 32 bit levels. I'm not sure if that is considered "full support".
We are trying to use the LDAP authentication option, but that tab is disabled. Other tabs such as Active Directory and WinNT are disabled as well. There maybe another component that we must bring down to 32 bit processing.
Is there a way to enable the LDAP authentication configuration tab?
thanks -
Tuxedo Memory Leak Issue (Tuxedo 8.1 - Windows Server 2003)
Hi
We are running tuxedo 8.1, 32 bit with patch level 258 in our windows server 2003 based production environment. We are currently facing an issue where the memory usage of machine slowly keeps on going higher and higher eventually resulting in “Memory Allocation Failure” to tuxedo servers. We then have to do a complete restart of tuxedo which stabilizes the system for other few days.
We have been analyzing the our source code in development/test environment using different tools like a customized Alzheimer tool and IBM purify but both tools reported no memory leaks. We then developed a test tuxedo server exposing a tuxedo service which simply allocates a memory to a response buffer and then returns the response buffer. I then configured tuxedo queue with same name “MEMTEST3” and configured a TMQForward server to call this “MEMTEST3” service every time a message is en-queued to the MEMTEST3 queue.
unsigned long _LIBENTRY ulTPAlloc(FBFR32 **ppc, long size)
unsigned long ulRes = MSG_SUCCESS_c;
ppc = (FBFR32 ) tpalloc("FML32", (char *) 0, size);
if (*ppc == (FBFR32 *) 0) {
vLogMessage(hGetLogHandle(), MSG_MEM_ALLOC_ERR_c, (char *) 0, (Event_t *) 0,
BM_NOSUPPRESS_c, size);
ulRes = MSG_MEM_ALLOC_ERR_c;
return (ulRes);
/*==============================================================================
Service MEMTEST2
==============================================================================*/
void MEMTEST3(TPSVCINFO *pRequest)
FBFR32 *pFmlResponse = NULL;
FBFR32 *pFml = NULL;
unsigned long ulRes = MSG_SUCCESS_c;
unsigned long ulActionCode = 0;
int iExitValue = 0;
long lTpurcode = 0;
FBFR32 *pFmlNULL = NULL;
userlog("Starting MEMTEST3 service.");
if (pRequest == NULL || pRequest->data == NULL)
vLogMessage(hGetLogHandle(), MSG_API_ARGS_ERR_c, NULL, NULL, BM_NOSUPPRESS_c);
ulRes = MSG_API_ARGS_ERR_c;
else
pFml = (FBFR32 *) pRequest->data;
userlog("MEMTEST3: GET THE MEM");
ulRes = ulTPAlloc(&pFmlResponse, 1024);
userlog("Ending MEMTEST3 service.");
tpreturn( iExitValue, lTpurcode, ( char * ) pFmlResponse , 0L, 0L );
While I was en-queuing the messages to the queue, I kept on monitoring the memory usage of the server hosting the service. What I observed was that I saw an initial hike in the usage of memory of the server followed by small jumps in memory increase. I kept on monitoring the server for a long time and the memory was never returned. What I suspect is that there is memory leak in tuxedo TMQforward process as it never released the memory allocated in the service.
Can anyone help how this situation can be avoided ?
Kind Regards,
AsimHi Todd,
Also as well as my previous question, I also found your reply to another user posting something similar at Re: Memory leaks in Tuxedo libraries
You mention that:
In general Tuxedo will free anything it allocates, although there are cases where memory is allocated and not freed because:
+1) it is one time or a fixed number of times allocations that will not continue to grow, and freeing up the memory just before exiting isn't of any benefit.+
+2) the memory is under Tuxedo's memory management functions where we manage our own look aside lists to provide better buffer allocation performance and again freeing these before process termination is of little benefit.+
Our code does only issue TPALLOC once and then a TPRETURN - could point (1) of your comment above also be something of concern to us, where we would observe a continuous growth of memory usage?
I know it may sound like a stupid question but do we need to run our code 20,000 times before memory gets freed?
Kind Regards,
Asim -
About memory issue during installing Oracle 11g on Windows Server 2003
Hi, all
When I installed Oracle 11g on Windows Server 2003 which the server is a virtual server, Oracle only can detect 2G memory.
But there are 4G memory with my server.
I want to know if the Oracle 11g's new feature or the virtual server lead the issue.
Also , I want to get your help to resolve the issue, thanks a lot.Let me get this straight:
You have created some virtual machine using someone's unknown VM software.
You have installed Windows Server 2003 (perhaps, but not confirmed 32-bit) to that VM.
You have allocated 4GB of memory to the VM (we guess ... not sure I'm ready to take your word on this)
You are attempting to install Oracle 11g (presumably 11gR1 32 bit for Windows) in the VM
And the Oracle (installer?) seems to be reporting that you only have 2GB RAM.
Since I personally have installed Oracle 11g 32bit for Windows on Windows 2003 server with 4GB RAM and had no issues, I would be investigating the (unknown) VM environment. -
User-changeable Passwords issue f/ ACS 4.0 on Windows Server 2003
I am having an issue with the UCP website not functioning correctly. I have installed it from the ACS 4.0 CD, following the instructions from the Cisco.com website, but cannot get past the Login page. Users can get to the Login page, but after they enter their information (username / password) and click Login, the server returns the following error page: "CGI Error. The apecified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers."
I cannot get past this page. I have verified that the website is installed as outlined in the Cisco procedure, and have re-installed twice to verify. I have granted Everyone Write and Execute permissions to the site directories, and granted the Virtual Directories Script and Executable access.
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. I am evaluating ACS 4.0 for deployment in our company, and UCP not working is a major stumbling block.
Additional configuration information:
Windows Server 2003 SP1, patched current to 8/29/06
The ACS server is also running on this server; it was installed and tested first, before installing UCP.
Thanks,
JohnChange the user that runs CSusercgi.exe to Administrator.Refer the following steps Install UCP 4 on a machine that runs IIS server,Open IIS manager,Locate Default Web Site, Double click on the virtual name 'securecgi-bin',Right click on CSusercgi.exe and choose Properties,Choose 'File Security' tab,Choose 'Edit' in 'Authentication and access control' area,Change username from IUSR_ to 'Administrator' and enter his password.
-
I have a user that all of a sudden was not able to open 70% of her files located on a file server, Windows Server 2003 running Active Directory, from her laptop. The same user can access all the same files from a different machine, logging on with the same
credentials. Just looking for a point in the right direction and a possible theory as what could cause this problem, an why all of a sudden. I did go back through the logs but nothing sticks out. For the most part the logs on the server and the laptop are
pretty clean.
Both machines are Latitude E5420s running Windows 7 Enterprise Service Pack 1. Both machines are 64bit and connect to the network via hard-wire, not wireless.
Thanks in advanced.
GrajekI would recommend proceeding that way:
Check that your DCs are in a healthy state and AD replication is fine: It might be that the user is member of security groups and the membership is not getting replicated properly which can cause this random behavior. You can use
dcdiag and repadmin for checks and you can refer to my recommendations here: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18513.active-directory-replication-issues-basic-troubleshooting-steps-single-ad-domain-in-a-single-ad-forest.aspx
Make sure that the file server is reachable from the user client computer. Start with
ping and nslookup. Also, you need to make sure that the traffic between the client and the server is not blocked or filtered. You might want to temporary disable security software for testing
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile -
Windows server 2012 as primary DC and DNS server and windows server 2003 as secondary DC and DNS
Migration from windows server 2003 AD DC and DNS server to windows server 2012 R2,
Cannot I set up Windows server 2012 R2 as primary DC and DNS , windows server 2003 as secondary DC and DNS ? (for backup server when server 2012 fail, user can continue to login and access internet services)You can mix both as long as your Forest and Domain Functional level are Windows Server 2003. However, I would like to bring your attention to this blog about known problems when mixing DCs with Windows Server 2003 and 2012 R2 OS:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2014/07/23/it-turns-out-that-weird-things-can-happen-when-you-mix-windows-server-2003-and-windows-server-2012-r2-domain-controllers.aspx
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile -
Windows Serve 2003 Paging Issue
Hi All,
We have one windows server 2003 enterprise edition with good CPU power & 24 GB of physical memory.
Since last few days weeks. This server becomes non-responsive with large number of event id 50 & 51. We can't access this system when this happens & someone need to go & hard reboot the system.
Assumes this is something related to memory leak from some application but didn't find the exact trace for that.
Any way to narrow down this trace.
Thanks,
SandeshHi sandeshgawade87,
Did you install the following Hotfix:
Some data is corrupted when cached and noncached I/O operations occur by using the same NTFS file handle
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981166
From the event ID, it also can caused by the hardware issue, please check your storage hardware related system.
The related KB:
Information about Event ID 51
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244780
Windows System Event Log Errors that indicate possible I/O problems can be associated with database inconsistency or performance problems for SQL Server
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2091098
I’m glad to be of help to you!
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place. -
I am trying to remote into a Windows Server 2003 from a Windows 7 machine and having issues
I am trying to remote into a Windows Server 2003 from a Windows 7 machine. It says "The terminal server has exceeded the maximum number of allowed connections".
My first stop in trying to solve this problem was here:
[URL="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows/command-line-hack-for-terminal-server-has-exceeded-the-maximum-number-of-allowed-connections/"]howtogeek.com[/URL]
And it says:
[I]
[INDENT]This problem happens because Windows only allows two remote terminal services connections when you are in administrative mode, and you’ve either got two people already on that server, or more likely, you’ve got a disconnected session that still thinks
it is active.
The problem with this error is that you have to actually get on the server console to fix the problem if the server isn’t in a domain. ([B]If you are in a domain, then just open Terminal Services Manager and log off or disconnect the sessions[/B])[/INDENT][/I]
So it seems to suggest that all I have to do really is to run the Terminal Services Manager but I cannot find it.
This web site from mssqltips.com [URL="http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1981/remote-desktop-error-terminal-server-has-exceeded-the-maximum-number-of-allowed-connections/"](click here)[/URL] says all I need to do is first execute "mstsc /
admin" from the command line. But, when I do that, I get a message when I try to remote to the server, that says this: "To log on to this remote console session, you must have administrative permissions on this computer".
So, what now? What do you suggest?Hi Bobby,
Yes, it is by design. By default, Windows Server only accepts two concurrent administrative sessions (Administrative Mode). It means that only two administrators can work on the server at
the same time.
If you would like more concurrent sessions, you need to purchase RDS CALs, install Terminal Services related server roles with proper configurations on the server.
Remote Desktop for Administration (server 2003)
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc785186(v=ws.10).aspx
What Is Terminal Services?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc782486(v=ws.10).aspx
Terminal Services Configuration
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc787078(v=ws.10).aspx
Purchase client access licenses
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3660ac5a-7468-48d3-b7e8-5529de8fb6c5
Thanks.
Jeremy Wu
TechNet Community Support -
Issues while weblogic 10.3.5 on 64 windows server 2003 R2
Hi,
I'm trying to configure weblogic in 64 bits windows server 2003 R2.
1.First, I installed 64 bit jdk.
2. Installed weblogic server(64 bit)
3. insalled ADR 11.1.1.5 with jdk path done in the first step.
4. Applied patch no : 12611176 (sherman patch)through opatch.
5. then try to upgradeADF from 'E:\oracle\WlsStandalone\oracle_common\common\bin\wlst.cmd', i'm getting following error :
wls:/offline> upgradeADF('E:\oracle\WlsStandalone\user_projects\domains\adf_domain')
Traceback (innermost last):
File "<console>", line 1, in ?
NameError: upgradeADF
wls:/offline>
6. After this i tried to apply second patch 12556632, this also failure.
Thanks in advance,
SANare you following the steps mentioned in the Opatch readme file, it will tell the way to upgrade, and it shows the prerequiestes also
-
In my sharepoint 2007, I have upgraded the OS from windows server 2003 standard to windows server 2003 enterprise R2 SP2. After the OS upgrade when I run the central admin it's showing this error "Microsoft Windows Sharepoint Services 3.0 Error 2908
error has occurred" screen shot below of the error.
Any help?Not sure I can help. In general MS does NOT support the upgrade of the Underlying OS without re-installing SharePoint. Many of the prerequisites that were installed when SharePoint was installed are OS specific. You can either contact
Product Support and see if they can provide any assistance or re-install SharePoint from scratch and re-attach/migrate all the existing databases with content into the new system on the new OS.
Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
Twitter: Follow @pstork
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have all my music on my ipad and icloud. I don't have itunes installed on a PC or MAC. I recently purchased Music Match, but all my non itunes music is on my ipad. When i turn on music match in the settings screen on my ipad i get a message that
-
I can not copy and paste from My E-Bay adds. Please help
I need to copy and paste add's from and to E-Bay. Firefox wont let me and says I need to go into profile directory. then user.js. ect ect. I can not figure out how to gt to Profile directory, much less user.js Please help me do this. Diana
-
What is the purpose and standard usage of this field in the GL Account Master?
-
My iPhone is unknown how to make it known
-
Special stock and movement type
Good morning to all, I create a type movment copyed from the 262 but I don't need to post in special stock for this movement. Is possible do disable special stock posting for a movement type? Thanks in advance to all Best regards Carlo