WIP Calculation Error - KKAX

Dear All,
When I run the KKAX (WIP Calculation),I got the foloowing error message:
There are values for cost element S43100 that are not assigned to any line ID
Message no. KJ161
Diagnosis
Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
Procedure
Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
If cost element "+++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "+++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.
I have done all the settings and checked throughly,but still Iam getting the above said error message.
Can anybody help me on this ?
Regards
Su

Hi,
1. Go to OKGB...
2. Decide which Line ID your cost ele S43100 belongs to... For eg: assume it shud belong to Line ID COP
3. Copy the existing Line of COP and change the field "Masked Cost Ele" from existing value to S43100
4. Transport this change across to all systems and then execute KKAX
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

KKAX WIP Calculation issue

Hello All Experts,
I am facing an issue while performing KKAX WIP Calculation. The error is quite simple that "Cost Element does not exist in controlling area XXXX on date XX.XX.XXXX.
Where I can see all the "Activity Types" which are used in Operation and Work Centres are DON'T have this cost element in master data. So from where this cost element is getting picked up ? I checked in KA03 this cost element is not even created so no question arises of using in costing anywhere I guess.
Experts guidance will be helpful on this !
Thank you.
Regards,
Sharu....

Self solved.
This cost element is maintained in "OKGA Update of WIP Calculation" and the same is not created in system.
Thanks all.
Regards,
Sharu.

Error in wip calculation

Dear gurus,
While diong wip calculation system is giving error
+There are values for cost element 50000000 that are not assigned to any line ID**Message no. KJ161+
Diagnosis
Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
Procedure
Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
+If cost element "++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.+
What does it mean and what should I do to solve this error
Thanks
Sanket

Hi,
You can find oss notes in the link
https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/
Given below is suggested by oss
Summary
Symptom
When you execute the results analysis or WIP calculation, the system displays the message KJ161 ("There are values for cost element & that are not assigned to any line ID"). In earlier releases, there was only a general information message in this case.
Other terms
KKA1, KKA2, KKA3, KKAI, KKAJ, KKAK, KKAS, KKAV, KKAX, KKAO, work in process.
Reason and Prerequisites
Due to popular customer demand, this general information message was changed into an error message, even if a missing cost element assignment has no effect in some cases.
The cost element specified in the message is intentionally not assigned to any line item ID because the cost element is not to be taken into account.
Solution
For example, you have the following options to eliminate the problem in WIP calculation and results analysis and have the system ignore a cost element:
1. Option
Adjust results analysis Customizing so that the system no longer displays the error message for the cost elements affected.
Create a new line ID.
Assign the cost elements specified in message KJ161 and which you do not want to take into account to this line ID. Consider that the assignment does not depend on the cost element alone.
Add this line ID to the update and assign category 'N'. The system will not take into account the values from line IDs with category 'N' during the results analysis. On the individual processing log, the system displays these values under N(i) and N(p).
2. Option
Adjust the results analysis Customizing so that the system cannot display the error message anymore.
Create a new line ID. It is to function as a remaining collector.
Select category 'N' in Customizing of the assignment if the respective values are to be ignored.
Select category 'D' if the respective values are not to be lost. Then you have the option later, for example, to assign a cost element missing up to now explicitly to another line ID. Then results analysis reposts the affected values in the next run of the remaining collector line ID to the correct line ID.
Assign all remaining cost elements to this line ID. You can do this by adding a wildcard entry in Customizing of the assignment and assign it to the new line ID.
3. Option
Adjust the results analysis Customizing so that the system displays the error message only if there are values not equal to zero.
Create a new line ID. It is to function as a remaining collector.
In the assignment Customizing, select the category 'N'.
Assign all remaining cost elements to this line ID. You can do this by adding a wildcard entry in Customizing of the assignment and assign it to the new line ID.
Use customer enhancement 1 of the results analysis to check whether or not there is a balance for the remaining collector line ID. Customer enhancement 1 is described in SAP note 26002.
Insert the source code from correction instructions number 257651 of this SAP note (302823) into customer Include ZXKAGU01 of customer enhancement 1. The source code uses a line ID - called 'RES' - as the remaining collector line ID in this case; the source code uses a line ID here named 'RES'; it may also have a different name.
The system now only displays message KJ161 if the cumulative balance of the remaining collector line ID is not equal to zero.
4. Option
Using customer enhancement 7, you can influence the message type of message KJ161.
In this case, refer to notes 198983, 455735, and 495279, which describe the customer enhancement and contain the program corrections required for the function outlined here.
Insert the source code from correction instructions number 257470 of this note (302823) into customer Include ZXKAGU07 of customer enhancement 7.
This causes the system to output an information message instead of an error message. If you select the message type J instead of I for the transfer to the user exits, the system suppresses the message completely.
Additional information
Unlike during the individual processing, message KJ161 does not necessarily have to occur during the collective processing of the results analysis because presummarized data may occur during the collective processing under certain conditions. This situation may result in the system already excluding records with the affected cost elements in advance, for example, when there are several records for the same cost element that balance to zero in every period.
If the object to be accrued by mistake was posted to with a cost element which is not assigned to the results analysis in the Customizing, and if this posting was reversed, in spite of the posting reversal the system can generate message KJ161 can be displayed for this cost element during the execution of the results analysis. The reason for this is that the first posting for example, is a debit posting and the reversing posting is a credit posting. This is managed in two table entries in the CO: one entry for the debit posting and another entry for the credit posting. There are results analysis methods which process these entries separately and which do not summarize these entries. For this reason, it is not possible to group these entries before the assignment to a line Id. A case by case summary would require a runtime-intensive analysis for each imported data record which would impair the performance too much. Therefore, also use one of the four options listed above for this purpose.
Regards,
satyajit

Report to see WIP calculation details for sales order

Hi,
I want to know which is the best report to see the details of WIP calculation for a sales order. There is a WIP posting of 1 million to a sales order and i want to understand how this amount was computed.

Hi,
Yes when i went there and call up the line items report i got the following error :-
Display of debits for object type SDI is not included
Message no. KD232
Diagnosis
You want to display a report for the current sender. This function is currently only possible for the following object types:
Cost Object
Orders
WBS Elements

Wip calculation in production Order

Hai friends
Can any one tell this 2 tcodes in Co . tell me these two codes KKAX,
KKAO why we use and how to calculate tell me clearly WIP functonality.

Hi,
WIP :
The WIP calculation process valuates the unfinished products (work in process).
In the Product Cost by Order component, the work in process is valuated at actual costs. Work in process is the difference between the debit and credit of an order that has not been completely delivered. This method determines the work in process for each production order by calculating the difference between the actual costs incurred and the actual costs settled (that is, the difference between the debits for goods issues, internal activity allocations, external activities, and overhead on the one hand, and the credits for goods receipts on the other). Once the last part of the order lot has been delivered to stock, any remaining work in process must be canceled so that the order costs can properly be settled to stock.
The status of the order determines whether WIP calculation creates or cancels the work in process.
u2022 If the order has the status REL (released), the system can calculate work in process.
u2022 Once the order receives the status DLV (Delivered) or TECO (Technically completed), the work in process calculated in a previous period is canceled.
for this you have calculate WIP for every order.
KKAX- this T.code is used for single order process.
KKAO-this T.code is used for collective process,here you process by plant.
Hope this is helps you.
Thanks,
Rau

Make to order WIP calculation with minus WIP

Dear Grus!
I'm in the make to order senario ,and using actual cost in WIP calculation.
finished goods using standard cost valuation.
Input 1000, output ( 100 USD *15EA), wip qty is 5EA.
now WIP become minus, so system generates error message.
How I should configure in a correct way?
Thank you ~
Lynn

Thanks for your answers,
The message number is
Plan cost <= actual cost. Cannot use method of apportionment (K,R)
Message no. KJ228
Sum across all apportionment numbers = 0. Cannot use MOA (K,R)
Message no. KJ233
MOA for reserves for unrealized costs in period 005 2009 was changed
Message no. KJ221
Negative wip indicatest that 1) you are not finished with the order and 2) at the WIP point in time, more value has been credited to the order that was issued to the order.
This could be due to failed goods movements or incomplete confirmations, out of date cost estimates, etc.
and standard cost is a little bit high, so the WIP balance is minus.
Br
Lynn

WIP calculation for Prod.order with status TECO

Hello all.
My question is the similar to WIP calculation for Prod.order with status DLV
But I need that
- if the Production order has status TECO - the system calculate WIP
- if the Production order has status DLV u2013 the system settle the order.
1. I try to change u201CStatus Numberu201D in TCODE OKGC. But I have receive two different result:
- if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status DLV from 3 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status DLV u2013 WIP have been calculated.
- but if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status TECO from 4 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status TECO u2013 WIP have been CANSELED.
2. I try to change results analysis key for status TECO from u201CZu201D to u201CFu201D in TCODE OKG3. BUT during WIP calculation the system create error message KJ 363 which require that results analysis key must be change to u201CZu201D
How can I resolve my problem?

Hi,
I don't have the answer if the requirement is that even after producing the materials, till the time accountant checks the order and does this action, it should remain in WIP. Honestly it doesn't make any sense to me or i have not understood this problem. Anyways as per my current understanding I can suggest the following process for your scenario.
Once production is stopped in between the process, the order should be in PDLV status (partial confirmations happened in the order)
Now go and clear the reservations manually from the production order .( delete the component line items from the order). Now depending on whether you are following WIP at actual cost, system will post the difference between credit and debit of that production order as WIP for the month end process.
Once Accountant okays the entries in the production order, he can do the TECO and settle the order. Now WIP will be reversed and variance will be posted.
To avoid the already produced goods mixing up with your other stock, u might want use Quality Management with the help of your PP consultant.
Best Regards
Vimal

WIP CALCULATION ON PRODUCTION ORDERS

Hi,
I have a problem for some production orders:
WHEN PERFORMING THE WIP CALCULATION (maybe with transaction code KKAO) ON SOME PRODUCTION ORDERS WE ARE GETTING THE FOLLOWING ERROR MESSAGE:
KJ161 "There are values for cost element xxxxxx that are not assigned to any line ID"
Is there anyone that can help us to understand this error message and to solve this problem?
Futher informations:
Considering the report "Orders: Actual/Plan/Variance" (transaction code S_ALR_87012993) I have noticed that this production orders have fot that particular cost element of the error message a negative actual value. This was generated by 1 document for each production order that I can see in transaction code MB23. In this document there is a movement type 531 (Receipt of by-product into unrestricted-use stock).
This document was made by transaction code COGI.
Is it this document that has created the problem for THE WIP CALCULATION?
How can we try to resolve it?
Thank you for all your help.
A.S.

Hi,
Please check the required settings in OKBG. Whether all required cost elements have been defined here?
Hope it will help you to get the clues
Regards,
Jigar

Reverse WIP Calculation on Prod Order

Issue: Cannot set DLFL flag on order because: There is still WIP for ORD.
I Set TECO and settle. Error: Status DLV/TECO was reversed after settlement of period 012 2007
Our Fiscal year 2008 began May 1 2007
Order was DLV in Period 12 FY 2007.
Year-end completed.
Late in May (Per 01/2008) Production Planner - reversed all GI, GR and Confirmation and set DLFL status.
Accountant discovered this, removed DLFL and tried to settle order properly, resulting in error: Status DLV/TECO was reversed after settlement of period 012 2007
Can't set DLFL, because of WIP.
Can't settle order to Variance because of error.
Can't reverse settlement from 2007 in 2008
Can't open 2007 to reverse settlement.
I would like to reverse WIP posting and then set DLFL status.
Any thoughts on how to do this?
Thanks
Althea

Hello,
If the WIP on a production order (with full settlement) is cancelled depends on the status of the production order. In standard this is DLV or TECO and is maintained in the valuation method in Customizing.
After the according status has been set on the order the WIP-calculation has to be executed again which will offset the WIP amount (i.e. 100 by -100). Thereupon variances and settlement have to be executed as well. After the settlement the WIP account in FI should have been offset as well.
Regards, Michael

Using a different Plan Version in WIP calculation

Hi experts.
I am using version 97 as plan in a wip calculation. The problem is that to recognize plan incomings my system uses version 0 and in the result analysis they always appear as 0 because the version the system is taking to recover the planned incomings is 97 and it is empty.
Is there any standard way to make it take version 97 only for costs?.
Thanks.
Alex

yes. this is true, the predicates are not preserved, I found that out after posting. ok, Im really thinking bug here, I'll explain further.
Im outside of prod time so can run the mview. the plan is pretty big so not going to post just yet, its just behavioural at this stage.
explain for QUERY, = plan good.
create table t1 as QUERY = plan good.
insert to table as QUERY = plan good
create mview as QUERY = plan bad. Not just timings are bad, the plan has completely changed. I stop the mview creation at this stage. good old ctrl+c.
the only thing thats different is Im running MVIEW create. So I hit my ADDM again, can see the bad plan and bad timings. So I get the SQL_ID from the ADDM for the bad plan and run a 10053 on it using the 11.2 sqldiag dump. Im hoping to see why its choosing the bad path
execute DBMS_SQLDIAG.DUMP_TRACE(p_sql_id=>'576wpd5g73q9c', p_child_number=>0, p_component=>'Compiler', p_file_id=>'BAD1');
edit my BAD1 10053 trace file and I see...the plan is GOOD. Its estimated 2 seconds to run for the SQL_ID thats actually bad when running.
This is why Im thinking bug.

Internal Charges Calculation Error status 03 & Charges disaapearing after FO creation

Hi Experts,
I have done following Config & data set up for Internal Settlement (Forwarding Order) while I intent to do Inter Company settlement. (I am using TM9.0 SP01 version)
In Movement Type Stage sequence set to “No Rule” for internal Settlement.
Created forwarding order by putting different Planning & Execution Forwarding House on Stage Level.
Agreement set is done & internal Charges are appearing correctly but with Calculation Error “03”
I rechecked Internal Agreement, Rate Tables, Calculation Sheet, Everything is fine.
There are two issues I need your experts advise to resolve following issues:
Charges are calculated correctly but Why Charge Cal. Status is 03? (No error on Charge Item level & Log analysis is fine)
Charges are disappearing when I create Freight Order against stages it. (with error shown below)
(attached Screenshots showing errors)
Regards,
Vinod Vikhe

Hello Vinod,
Still nothing for me...
Anyway, have you checked if the assigned of BP to the organization unit? Sometimes this is the reason the internal calculation does not work.
Best Regards, Marcelo

"Item 10 IPC:TTE:Calculation error: Pricing error: Mandatory condition & is

Hello Experts,
I need your help to solve this TTE pricing error.
In Service Order, I am getting this error message for one particular material only
"Item 10 IPC:TTE:Calculation error: Pricing error: Mandatory condition & is missing".
Remaining materils I am not getting this error message.
Please proivide your suggestions to crack this.
Thanks

Hi,
This message come when you caculate 0TTE when doing cross country transactions . Check if this codition needs to be caculated for your order. If it is not required you should not make call .You can try to eliminate this error bu uisng the BADI BADI_TTE_DOCUMENT

Project commintment as real in WIP calculation

Hi.
In our company we want to consider the commitment as real in WIP calculation, the problem is that i have customized it in OKG3, by puting field Commitments equa to A, because I want to consider purchase requisitions, and purchase orders commitment.
The problem is that it is not working. Does anyone know if is there something else that i have to do.
Of course if it is impossible to be done in a standard way, i can use and exit, but would like not to.
Thanks.
Alex

Hi Alex,
You can try the Results Analysis type 'F-WIP calculation on the basis of Actual costs' in the expert mode and use enhancement in the valuation basis.
Hope this may solve your issue. There is no standard configuration for including commitments in the WIP calculation.
Thanks
regards
Srinivasan Desingh

Installment cannot be calculated; error in repayment plan Infotype 0045

Hello Experts.
I am getting error in IT0045
"Installment cannot be calculated; error in repayment plan"
Please give solution
Regards
Ramu

Hi Ramu
When you are getting this error? While processing salary.
Thanks
Yogesh

WIP calculation for Sales Order no FI document

Hi,
We are using the MTO scenario with valuated salaes order stock and it wll carry revenue and costs wherein we configured the RA key correctly with valuation method as 01 and we defined all configuration correctlly line ID,s and assignment and posting rules etc,. We have incurred the cost on Prodction order assgined to Sales Order and to calculate the WIP We have done the KKA3 and we run the VA88 it is not psoting any accounting document and it is settling the costs and COPA document is generatig.

Hi,
You might have to check your scenario.
Normally when there is a CO-PA document generated, there is no WIP calculation happening.
The COS/Revenue is being transferred to CO-PA.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

WIP Calculation Error - KKAX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for