WIP Credit Balance - Internal Capital Order Settlement Problem - KO88

Hi Experts,
I am new to SAP and currently undergoing my first implementation. We are trying to settle as many internal capital orders before conversion, but since I am new I am learning the AUC process slowly.
I am trying to settle assets to a capital work order and receiving the [maintain the settlement rule of the sender]. How can I fix this? If you can provide explanation as to the process it would be greatly appreciated.

hello,
Check your settlement rule? there must be a period maintained and this does not follow within that period
extend the period of settlement rule either greater than validity period of settlement rule.
Thanks
Hrusikesh

Similar Messages

  • Sales order settlement Problem with Internal Order

    HI Dear Friends,
    How are you, I am fine.
    We have 1 Process here Related with SD & FI/CO
    for 1 process we have treat as a small Project,
    the process is we have make 1st Contract and create Internal order and assign Internal order to Contract
    then Create Sales Release Order and assing Internal Order in Settlement Rule in Sales order.
    then we create billing ref to Contract and then we did PGI.
    1) at billing time the Internal Order is Updatting
    2) at PGI time internal Order is not updating  - what is the right process - the internal; Order will be updating or not
    then we have to do Sales order Settlement thtough Trasaction code VA88
    what will happned at this level pleas be advicsed becos when i do this it is giving messges not is toi be settled.
    Friends I did all exercise complete except Settlement trough T-Code VA88.
    When I am going to do this settlement VA88 it is giving messages there is nothing to be settle.
    What I have to do please be advised.
    I did all these activities:
    1)     Create sales Contract
    2)     Create Internal Order
    3)     Assign Internal Order to sales Contract
    4)     Crate Release Sales Order
    5)     Assign Internal Order to Release Sales Order
    6)     Delivery & PGI
    7)     Billing         (at billing time the internal Order should be Updates (pls advise it should be or not)
    8)     Last is Settlement VA88 u2013 this time it is giving Error.
    When I settle the Sales order to internal order what will happens. Which value will update.
    Please reply me frds,
    Thanks,
    Srem.

    hello Lakshmipathi,
    Thanks a lot for your reply.
    I tried to change the requierement class in order to put one with special stock E as you explained, but i still have my weird schedule line. When i put the item in the order it is 0 stock for today, but stock find in 12 days either if there is stock or no(unrestricted stock i mean).
    If i change the RDD in more than 12 days the stock is available for the date requested.
    If you have an idea of what could be wrong because on my case i want the schedule line to be at 0 while the sales order reservation has not been processed (via MB1B/412/E) and once the stock movement is done the schedule line has to be find.
    I dont know if im clear enought..
    To be more clear,  i want the schedule line based on the "sales order stock" and not on the "unrestricted stock".
    thanks for your help!
    Guillaume

  • ORDER SETTLEMENT PROBLEM

    Hi all,
    i settled a production order let say 'X' through t code ko88 (this order is created by t code iw31) now again when i am tring to settle the same order throgh t code it is allowing me to settle though it is already settled 100% in production server
    But in development server it is giving me message that 'Order is settled'.
    Please tell me why system is allowing me in production to settle the same order?
    waiting for response

    Hi Sandeep,
    When you said that the Order was created using the t code IW31, I understand that it is a Maintenance Order. Maintenance Orders are settled collectively using t code KO8G. Make sure that when you are saying, the Order was settled when you exectued CO88, what is the balance on that Order? was it Zero? I doubt that.
    I feel, when you executed CO88, that Maintenance Order might not got Settled. So, when you are trying to settle using KO88 (single order processing), it is settling.
    Check once again and revert back...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Order Settlement Problems

    Hello Experts
    I had settled many Production and Process Orders for July Month End but I did it directly without running the variance calculations (KKS1). I found that many orders did not get settled in this process. Did this happen because I did not run the variance calculations?
    Now, when I settle those unsettled orders individually they are getting settled but in the August month and not in the July Month.
    Is Variance calculation a must before settling the Orders?
    Prashant

    Production orders settlement depends on their status
    Unfinished orders go to WIP
    Finished orders (TECO, DLV) settle to varriance accounts
    If you didn't do the variance calculation ther was nothing to settle - so it is a must
    I don't understand how your individual settlements finishe in August as you have to specify the month of settlement
    cherrs
    matej

  • Production order settlement (co88/ko88)

    when we settle the production order variances , it will take one account from OBYC(t-code)/PRD-PRF. But how does systemdetermines the other account?
    and what should be the GL entry?
    Like Credit which balnce sheet account /P&l account
    Or debit which balnce sheet account /P&l account

    Hi,
    it is going to hit GBB-AUA or GBB-AUF based on your configuration.
    AUA: for order settlement
    AUF: for goods receipts for orders (without account assignment) and for order settlement if AUA is not maintained.
    PRD-PRF- GL account should not to be a cost element.make sure that.
    Are you analysing production variance in COPA?if so.check the configuration
    1.Configuration like allocation structure,PA transfer structure,Settlement profile.
    2.Variance Analysis configuration,like target version,variance key etc.
    Postings:
    Credit : GBB-AUA or AUF -->
    Debit : PRD-PRF--> this should not a be cost element.
    Hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Internal order settlement through KO88

    Hi Experts,
    i have one issue where i need to settle the Order balances to AUC on periodic basis, but user has not done it on periodic basis from past 7months. when we try to do it now, system is giving the error that the posting period is not opened to make the postings. Business is not accepting to open the closed posting periods. when we tried to do the full settlement, though the system is not allowing as the settlement type in distibution rule is PER(Periodic settlement).
    Can any one clarify me, if i change the settlement type to FUL and do the full settlement and can create the Asset and settle the balances to asset also through FUL settlement.
    OR can suggest me how i can settle these balances with out opening the posting periods and with out impacting settling the balances to asset as well.
    Thanks in advance,
    Venkat

    Hi,
    you can settle using "PER" settlement rule doing it period by period. Just key in the actual posting period in the field "posting period" in ko88.
    Example: you are missing settlements from period 002/2009 to 009/2009, actual period is 011/2009. So you settle period 002/2009 with "PER" in posting period 011/2009. Aftre this had happened, settle 003/2009 to posting period 011/2009, and so on...
    Best regards, Christian

  • Internal Order Settlement Issue (KO88)

    Hi,
    While doing KO88 to settle the internal order, the full amount of asset is not getting capitalised. My allocation structure and the settlement rule are correct.
    For Eg. Asset Value = INR 1000000
                Down Payment = INR 200000
    However, while doing KO88, the system should capitalise entire INR 1000000, but it capitalising only INR 800000.
    the first line item shows                                 INR 1000000
    the second line item shows                            INR 200000- (this amount is hitting some primary cost element configured in           the  (OKEP  Down payment - default cost element assignment) screen
    the net amount (that will be capitalised =       INR  800000
    can anybody assist me on this.........

    Hi,
    you can settle using "PER" settlement rule doing it period by period. Just key in the actual posting period in the field "posting period" in ko88.
    Example: you are missing settlements from period 002/2009 to 009/2009, actual period is 011/2009. So you settle period 002/2009 with "PER" in posting period 011/2009. Aftre this had happened, settle 003/2009 to posting period 011/2009, and so on...
    Best regards, Christian

  • Stop Process order settlement (CO88/KO88) for DLV status orders

    Hello gurus,
    My business requirement is to prevent process orders with status DLV (Delivery completed). In standard SAP orders with DLV/TECO are being settled to settlement receiver. ANy help would be richly rewarded.
    Thanks
    RG

    Dear Ajay,
    Thanks.
    I am able to change the profile. But after that when I try to exit from the screen system throws the following error/message :
    1  Receiver categ. MAT is not allowed by settlement prof. 000090 for this sender
    2. Maximum number of 0 rules reached
    3. Rules exist, but set. prof. 000090 states no settmt of act.costs/cost of sales
    First two are Errors and last one is message with yellow mark.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Nirav

  • Internal Order Settlement Posting Date

    Hi gurus,
    Can I change the posting date on an Internal Order settlement or it has to be always the last day of the settlement period?

    Hi Susanna,
    Yes, you can change the posting date. On order settlement screen KO88 or KO8G, under extras you can find posting date where you can enter the new posting date however, it should be within the open period.
    Assign points if helpful
    Thanks,
    Manoj

  • Problem in Production Order settlement.

    Hi.
    My production order have the status DLV,when i go to cost balance it shows some cost balance as negative,in overhead calculation,how to select period? there is no period in F4.When i put 1 and execute the overhead it show no order debit.
    When i execute the order settlement in KO88 a message comes showing that "There are no accured amounts,settlement is not possible.".I can not activate a deletion flag on the order also.
    Please help.
    Thanks.
    Rishi

    HI Rishi,
    Can you elaborate your question more clearly..
    Regard,s
    Ramesh.

  • Internal order settlement to G/L account

    Dear All,
    User has created one internal order 650002012 and the settlement profile is created settle to G/L account S882000000. this is a cost element category "1" (Loss on contract cancellation & co).
    In the internal order The Responsible cost center is DA01D89998 (Validation & Eng Admin-St) the profit center for this "DA01".
    In the internal order the Requesting cost center is DA26ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Deltron), the profit center is "DA26"
    in the settlement profile when i double click on the settlement rule, he has assigned the Cost center DA01ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Ko) and the profit center is "DA01".
    But when he execute the T.C "KO8G" the system is showing the error is " G/L account requires an assignement to CO object".
    1. The receiver G/L account has created as a cost element. is this correct?
    2. In the allocation structure do we have to select the "By cost element check box" or do we have to give the secondary cost element in the settlement cost element field.
    Please give the sugessions to solve this problem.
    Thanks and regards,
    Rao.

    It sounds like you are a little confused on how internal order settlement works.  If you want the internal order to settle to a G/L account then you must enter the G/L account number in the settlement rule in the internal order.  To do this, click on the settlement rule button in the order, select category G/L and enter the G/L account number.  In order for you to be able to select G/L as a settlement object the settlement profile you've assigned to the order must allow this.  Check the settlement profile and make sure that G/L account is listed as settlement optional or settlement required.  Also check the allocation structure that is attached to the settlement profile. In the allocation structure you must have an entry under the settlement cost element for receiver category G/L.  Here you should specify a cost element of type 22 as the settlement cost element.
    When you make those settings you will be able to specify the receiving G/L account in the internal order.  The system will then credit the internal order for the settlment amount with the credit posted on the category 22 cost element specified in the allocation structure.  The debit will appear on the G/L account you specified in the internal order's settlement rule.  Normally, the receiving G/L account would not be setup as a cost element.  if you do set it up as a cost element you will need to use an automatic account assignment setting (OKB9) to specify the cost object that it will post to.
    thanks,

  • WIP Accounts showing credit balance in trial balance

    hi all,
    With our client,In trial balance most of WIP Accounts is showing Credit balance(nearly crores),
    normally it will have debit balance,In production process issue type is backflush  for all items &
    all production orders was closed after completion of production & WIP Accounts should have megre/nil
    balance after completion of production.
    What could be the problem ?
    Jeyakanthan

    Thanks Jesper & Sudha.
    Using general ledger report we analyzed WIP G/L accounts there is nothing wrong in JE postings,
    Problem is old production orders belonged to previous fiscal year were closed in current year,
    which causes credit balance higher than debit balance, WIP g/l account balances were not brought to
    zero using JE's(SinceWIP is actually an offsetting account).
    Problem may be solved by closing production orders in their respective months,locking posting periods
    belong to previous fiscal year,alerting users using query by alert management.
    Jeyakanthan

  • Using a different Sender GL in Internal Order Settlement

    When we settle an Internal Order from GL/Cost Element 1 to Fixed Assets, we get:
    Dr: Fixed Asset
    Cr: GL/Cost Element 1.
    For various reasons, we do not want to Credit the original GL/Cost Element but rather another one.
    Does anyone have any sugestions as to how this can be achieved?
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Can you tell me what is meant by "Internal Order from GL/Cost Element.."? 
    As per the functionality, when you settle an internal order, something is moved from the intrnal order and put to another.  Hence the place from where it is moved is credited and the receiver is debited.  The internal order has postings through the cost element you have posted.  So the movement is from what the internal order has in its account. 
    Order settlement is done through a secondary cost element created and this cost element is used for debiting and crediting the sender and receivers.  Hence your idea of using a totally different GL/Cost element (of course that do not have postings with respect fo the internal order in question) is not practical, I hope.

  • Internal Order Settlement Issue

    HI,
    I have posted some entries in Postage internal orders. But when i tried to settle that in KO88, it is showing the below message.
    No Transaction Data Posted Since Last Settlement
    Actually once the client executed KO8G transaction for all orders. At that time 2 Orders was not settled. Now When i tried to settle them in KO88, It is giving the above message.
    Why it is not getting settled? How to fix this error. Kindly help me
    Thanks
    Kishore

    Dear,
    Because these order are alreaddy settled. No balance on these order please check in KKBC_ORD. You can just settle additional amounts posted since last settlement.
    For deatils refer this link,
    Order Settlement
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Maintain internal order settlement rule using LSMW

    HI ALL
    I want to do mass maintenance of internal order settlement rule. Settlement category is PSG.
    But when I use LSMW to do KO02, I only can input one settlement receriver, the first line will be overwritten by the second line.
    I also see BAPI INTERNAL_ORDER_CREATE,but cannot find PSG as a settlement category.
    Does anyone know how to do this?
    THX
    Deelia

    Hi Lian
    When you do recording, enter two settlement rules..
    Then, before pressing the "DEFAULT ALL" button, change the Field names for the 2nd settlement rule
    The problem you described happens because the field names for both settlement rules are same.. Hence, it gets overwritten
    Assume that field name for Order is AUFNR... You can change the field name in recording to ZAUFNR for one of the fields
    See the screen shot, wherein I changed the name of the recorded field to _01, _15 and _70
    Br. Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for