Wireless internet speeds slower after upgrading from 10/2 to 50/25?? Using olders revision Mi424WR.

We have been using the oldest version/revision of the Actiontec Mi424WR router provided by verizon for 3+ years.  Recently we upgraded from an outdated 10/2 internet plan to our current 50/25 wireless plan.  The speeds when wired are fantastic, but with wireless, on multiple computers the speed even right next to the router hovers at about 10mbps.  I understand about the degradation and limit of wireless signals, but we should absolutely be getting higher download speeds than 10mbps(~1Mb/s).  On our older 10/2 mbps plan our devices were receiving consistant download speeds of higher than we are getting now, maxing out at 1.6Mb/s usually.  The only change that has been made recently is we reset the router to fatory settings, leading me to believe that wireless settings that were in place before are no longer there and throttling wireless speeds.  I do not expect to get the full 50+ mbps speed that I am getting from wired, but I do expect my wireless speeds to be consistent with our upgraded plan(let alone slower than our massively slower old plan).  Any thoughts or help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

You should definetely get better speeds even with an older router, upto about 20 or so. 
If that works for you, then it's probably just a little wireless interference.   
 you can change that in the router.   open a browser, and go to http://192.168.1.1
user name is admin.  and the password is most likely the serial number found on the service tag of your VZ router unless you changed it. Once you login succesfully, go to the top and hit wireless, then on the left basic security.   then go to option 3 which is channel  1, 6 and 11 and are the only channels you should try.
So it will likely be set to auto, change it to 11 and put the check for keep settings even after reboot (Directly under the channel) and then hit apply.  after you hit apply,  test your connection out, if you notice a difference, leave it like that until the problem happens again, and if it happens again, go back into the router, and try channel 6,     test it out.  and then finally 1 if the first two don't work.
Also take a look at page 2 of Actiontec's Wireless PDF File.  It gives you some idea's with regards to position and orientation of where the router sits and how it can best be positioned for maximum coverage.
  http://support.actiontec.com/doc_files/MI424WR_Rev​(all)_Wireless_Networking_Guide.pdf

Similar Messages

  • SAP Business One V9 PL09 HF01 is slow after upgrading from 8.8 pl12

    Hi Experts,
    Recently we upgraded V9 Pl09 HF01 for a customer from V8.8 PL12, initally the application was working fine but few days before customer informed that SAP b1 is running very slow after upgrade. we are not sure this happen moreover we checked the server onfiguration and client machine configuration where the configurations are very good to running B1 v9.
    if the customer want to post an invoice, in which the item selection is taking more thant 2 mins to open the item list window.
    Please have a look on server and client hardware configuration,
    Server is
    ML350 G6 Dual Processor Capable, 1 x Xeon
    5504 (2000/800-4MB) Quad Core, 1x2GB, 16GB memory,
    This server only runs SAP, all the rest through duplicate server.
    Client PCs
    Lenovo ThinkCentre A58 7515 - Tower - 1 x P
    E5400 / 2.7 GHz - RAM 4 GB and 2 GB RAM- HDD 1 x 320
    GB - DVD-Writer - GMA X4500 - Gigabit
    Ethernet - Windows 7 Pro 32 bit
    Please help to solve this problem.
    Regards
    Sudhir Tamilvanan

    Hi Sudhir,
    What is the size of the database ?
    Regards,
    Johan

  • Why is my second computer's (wireless) internet speed slower than my 'base' computer's (non-wireless)?

    My son has a Macbook that  he uses in another room of our house. The router is at my desk, and is wired to my desktop MacMini. Why should his internet speed be slower than mine? Is there a remedy such as switching providers or routers?

    According to the manual for the router you said you have, the maximum supported speed is 22 Mbps for 802.11b and 54Mbps for 802.11b/g - since that MacBook supports 802.11a/b/g/n, 54Mbps is the best case scenario if it's negotiating an "g" connection or 22Mbps if it gets a "b" type connection. So what is your internet connection speed? And that 22/54Mbps is best case - depends on how many wall and other obstructions it goes thru by the time it gets to his MacBook.
    If he holds down the Option key and clicks on the WiFi icon in the title bar he should see what type of connection his MacBook has negotiated with the router. For example here is what mine shows (the connection type is listed as a 802.11/g, 2.4GHz, 54Mbps, channel 11, 20 MHz, etc):
    Another thing to try and make a quick measure of the speed between his MacBook and the local router and your Mini is copy a big file from your computer to his. That will give you a good idea of the speed of his wireless connection to the router.
    Good luck...

  • SQL query is slow after upgrading from SQL 2008 to SQL 2008 R2

    Hello
    We were using SQL 2008 Standard, but after upgrading to R2, following query is much slower (takes 5 seconds instead of less than 1 second), how is this possible?
    Regards, Hennie
    SELECT
     P.BSN,
     P.Persnr,
     P.Roepnaam,
     P.Tussenvoegsels,
     P.Achternaam,
     P.Geslacht,
     COALESCE (P.Achternaam + ', ' + P.Roepnaam + ' ' + P.Tussenvoegsels, P.Achternaam + ', ' + P.Roepnaam, P.Achternaam) AS naamvolledig,
     P.Telmobiel,
     P.Telvast,
     P.Postcode,
     G.groep,
     COALESCE (RM.nieuweDag, GR.Dag) AS dag,
     COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum) AS datum,
     DATEPART(ww, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) AS weeknummer,
     DATEPART(yyyy, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) AS jaar,
     CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
      CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
       CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
      ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108) AS begintijdberekend,
     CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
      CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
       CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END)
      ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108) AS eindtijdberekend,
     CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN
       CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END), 108) + '-' +
       CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END), 108)
      ELSE CONVERT(NCHAR(5),COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd), 108) + '-' + CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd), 108)
      END AS Tijdspanne,
     CASE
      WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 AND R.id_relaties = 9 THEN 'Werk Intern'
      WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN R.relatienaam
      ELSE L.lokatie END AS Lokatieberekend,
     R.relatienaam AS relatie,
     L.IntExt,
     RA.Omschrijving AS roosteractiviteit,
     A.instroomdatum,
     A.uitstroomdatum,
     TT.trajecttype,
     W.Naamvolledig AS Werkcoach,
     A.ID_groepen,
     T.ID_personen,
     A.ID_werkcoaches,
     CASE
      WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 AND R.id_relaties = 9 THEN 20
      WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN R.id_relaties
      ELSE L.ID_relaties END AS ID_lokatieberekend,
     A.ID_relaties AS ID_relatie,
     R.nummer2 AS capaciteit,
     GR.ID_groepsroosters,
     CAST(CASE WHEN foto IS NOT NULL THEN 'Ja' ELSE NULL END AS char(2)) AS Foto,
     W.Email,
     W.TelefoonMobiel,
     W.TelefoonVast
    FROM
     dbo.personen AS P INNER JOIN
     dbo.trajecten AS T ON T.ID_personen = P.ID_personen INNER JOIN
     dbo.trajecttype AS TT ON T.ID_trajecttype = TT.ID_trajecttype INNER JOIN
     dbo.trajectactiviteiten AS A ON A.ID_trajecten = T.ID_trajecten INNER JOIN
     dbo.groepsroosters AS GR ON GR.ID_groepen = A.ID_groepen LEFT OUTER JOIN
     dbo.roosteractiviteit AS RA ON GR.ID_roosteractiviteit = RA.ID_roosteractiviteit INNER JOIN
     dbo.lokaties AS L ON GR.ID_lokaties = L.ID_lokaties INNER JOIN
     dbo.werkcoaches AS W ON A.ID_werkcoaches = W.ID_werkcoaches INNER JOIN
     dbo.groepen AS G ON A.ID_groepen = G.ID_groepen LEFT OUTER JOIN
     dbo.relaties AS R ON A.ID_relaties = R.ID_relaties LEFT OUTER JOIN
     dbo.roostermutaties AS RM ON P.ID_personen = RM.ID_personen AND GR.ID_groepsroosters = RM.ID_groepsroosters AND RM.aanwezig IS NULL
    WHERE
     (COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum) BETWEEN GETDATE() - 1 AND GETDATE() + 13)
     AND (COALESCE (DATEDIFF(day, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum), A.uitstroomdatum), 0) >= 0)
     AND (DATEDIFF(day, A.instroomdatum, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) >= 0)
     AND ((SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
      FROM dbo.roostermutaties AS RM2
      WHERE (P.ID_personen = ID_personen)
      AND (GR.ID_groepsroosters = ID_groepsroosters)
      AND (CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), begintijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
      CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
      CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
      ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108)) AND
      (CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), eindtijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
      CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END) ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108))) = 0)

    We were using SQL 2008 Standard, but after upgrading to R2, following query is much slower (takes 5 seconds instead of less than 1 second), how is this possible?
    It is not uncommon to experience performance problems following an upgrade when there are issues with original query.  Non-sargable expressions like Olaf called out are often the culprit, as well as lack of useful indexes and statistics. 
    The optimizer cannot glean accurate row count estimates or use indexes efficiently so the resultant plan may not be optimal for the task at hand.  It is only by happenstance that old plan performed better; it could just as well be the other way around,
    but again only by chance since the optimizer is guessing.
    You might also try using EXISTS instead of SELECT COUNT(*)...= 0:
    AND EXISTS(SELECT *
    FROM dbo.roostermutaties AS RM2
    WHERE P.ID_personen = ID_personen
    AND GR.ID_groepsroosters = ID_groepsroosters
    AND CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), begintijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
    CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
    CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
    ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108)
    AND CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), eindtijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
    CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END) ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108))
    Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

  • Internet speed compromised after upgrade to iOS 8

    Have recently upgraded to iOS 8 and Internet speed has been drastically reduced on my iPad air (128Gb). Is there anyone out there who can assist? I'm on a weak 3G network.

    First try a soft reset.  Hold the home & sleep/wake button down simultaneously., keep holding until you see the Apple logo appear then let go & let the iPad boot normally.
    If that doesn't help, go to Settings->General->Reset->Reset All Settings.  You will not lose any data but will have to login to any wifi networks you previously connected with.  You could also just try resetting Network Settings but I find resetting all settings can clear up a bunch of issues including speed & usability.

  • ACR extremely slow after upgrade from CS4 to CS5

    After upgrading Photoshop and Bridge from 4.0 to 5.0 I can no longer edit photos in ACR (plugin v 6.3) because it now takes impractically long to refresh the image after most changes. For example, on the Basic pane if I change a setting such as Exposure, Brightness, etc. with a slider it takes about 5 seconds before I see the change to the image. Since CS4 is still on my computer if I load CS4 Bridge, open the same image in Camera Raw (plugin v 5.5) the same operation refreshes the image in about a half second. If I can't solve this problem I'll have to abandon CS5 and go back to CS4, which would be a shame. Any ideas?  Thank you!

    You shouldn't be running version 5.5  of the Camera Raw plug-in in CS4 either.  Update to ACR 5.7 ASAP.
    One should ALWAYS run the LATEST release of ACR for your version of Photoshop, no exceptions.  Each new release brings unheralded, unannounced and sometimes even unacknowledged bug fixes and improvements, beyond support for newer cameras.
    Staying with an older version just because your camera is already supported by it is a very<euphemism>unwise</euphemism> decision.

  • Cannot connect to internet with Huawei after upgrade from 10.7.4 to 10.7.5

    I have an iMac which came with os X 10.7.4.When I installed my Huawei E303 data card, I was able toconnect to the internet.
    After upgrading to 10.7.5 the system appears toconnect and I can text, but there is nointernet connectivity.
    Thanks for any advice

    Hi, this has worked for a few...
    Make a New Location, Using network locations in Mac OS X ...
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2712
    10.7 & 10.8…
    System Preferences>Network, top of window>Locations>Edit Locations, little plus icon, give it a name.
    10.5.x/10.6.x/10.7.x instructions...
    System Preferences>Network, click on the little gear at the bottom next to the + & - icons, (unlock lock first if locked), choose Set Service Order.
    The interface that connects to the Internet should be dragged to the top of the list.
    For 10.5/10.6/10.7, System Preferences>Network, unlock the lock if need be, highlight the Interface you use to connect to Internet, click on the advanced button, click on the DNS tab, click on the little plus icon, then add these numbers...
    208.67.222.222
    208.67.220.220
    Click OK.

  • FF gets veery slow after upgrade from 3.6.28 to any later version incl 12

    Removal, restart and reinstallation of 3.6.28 cures the problem. The slowness is expressed when changing pages and/or srolling.
    The computer is Vaio VPCX11S1E lightweight w/ 128 GB SSD, 2GB RAM, Awast antivirus and Zone Alarm firewall.
    No private plugins have been nsntalled

    Try to start Firefox in [[Safe mode|Safe mode]]. This mode disables all extensions, user customizations, hardware acceleration, etc. temporarily for diagnostic and troubleshooting. If Firefox works fine in Safe Mode, then this is likely an add-on issue. Restart Firefox in normal mode, then type "About:addons" (without the quotes) in the address bar. Disable your extensions one by one, restarting Firefox between each one, until you find the trouble maker. Once you do, you can disable that add-on and report the issue to that add-on's developer.
    A few other basic trouble shooting things you can try is this:
    Run all Windows Updates, install all needed service packs, etc.
    Update your graphics driver (Firefox uses your graphics card for some rendering, and an out of date graphics card driver can cause problems. [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-do-i-upgrade-my-graphics-drivers https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-do-i-upgrade-my-graphics-drivers].
    Update all your plugins (Flash, Java, etc.): [http://www.mozilla.org/plugincheck/ http://www.mozilla.org/plugincheck/].
    Download and Install MalwareBytes Anti-Malware, run a full Scan. [http://www.malwarebytes.org/ http://www.malwarebytes.org/]. This helps check that there are no viruses on your computer causing issues. You can uninstall this program after you clean off any infections.

  • Blob column slow after upgrade from 9i to 11g

    Hello, I recently upgraded 9i to 11g and the insert for blob column in one of the table is now really slow. can anyone help me please? thanks

    Welcome to the forums !
    It would be best to trace the insert statement. Pl see these threads on how to post a tuning request -
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
    When your query takes too long ...
    HTH
    Srini

  • Weblogic 10.3.2 - Page reload in browser is very slow after upgrade from 8.

    when i first load portal page with empty cache it comes up with in 8 seconds..
    i have noticed that
    browser requests the page -- weblogic app server sends back the file lets say xxxx.css with response 200
    after the first load, if i reload the page
    browser requests the page with the below header info.. and the weblogic server takes a long time to send back 304 not modified error, about 30+ seconds
    in this case browser is sending If-Modified-Since: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:47:22 GMT , and here weblogic server takes 30+ seconds to check and return the 304 not modified page
    can any one help what might be the issue
    http:/xxxx/let.css
    GET xxx/let.css HTTP/1.1
    Host: xxxxxxx
    User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
    Accept: text/css,*/*;q=0.1
    Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
    Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
    Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
    Keep-Alive: 115
    Connection: keep-alive
    Referer: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Cookie: JSESSIONID=FdZTM1FGnHKkRZ1x7pVpJ1pqbbzxqjbC4mx1sSGkRX5cHXndLhMJ!-1352170763; NSC_Qpsubm-80=0ac844d70050; s_cc=true; SC_LINKS=%5B%5BB%5D%5D; Not Segmented By Business Size=Not%20Segmented%20By%20Business%20Size; Did Not Visit The Support Site=Did%20Not%20Visit%20The%20Support%20Site; Core Site Page (Includes Microsite Pages)=Core%20Site%20Page%20%28Includes%20Microsite%20Pages%29; s_sq=%5B%5BB%5D%5D
    If-Modified-Since: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:47:22 GMT
    Cache-Control: max-age=0
    HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified
    Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:13:23 GMT
    Server: Apache/2.0.63 (Unix)
    Connection: Keep-Alive
    Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100
    Expires: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:13:23 GMT
    Cache-Control: max-age=0
    Vary: Accept-Encoding
    Set-Cookie: NSC_Qpsubm-80=0ac844d70050;expires=Wed,13-Oct-10 10:15:56 GMT;path=/

    We've seen this issue on some servers, but not on others running the same application. We're still researching the problem, but the best lead we've got so far is that it might have something to do with the network, either with not being able to look up a network address with DNS or accessing this address.

  • ITunes 9.0.3 Visualizer very slow after upgrading from 9.0.2

    hi all !
    i noticed that when I start the visualizer, rather than playing nice and smooth as it used to, it now chunks.
    anybody else seeing this and is there a solution ?
    tia

    take a look here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11239021#11239021.

  • Very slow encoding after upgrade from 5.03 to 5.5 with MXO2 mini

    Hi all.
    After upgrading from CS5.03 to 5.5 my encoding now takes 5 times as long. A 2 minute HD Video file would take 2 minutes, and still does on the PC I haven't upgraded (identical almost) but now with CS5.5 it takes almost 11 minutes.
    Some explanation....
    I create HD MJPEG files on a PC with Blackmagic Decklink.
    I transfer these files to an HPz800 which used to run CS5.03 with Matrox Utils 5.1.1.37 and an MXO2 Mini with Max. (Nvidia Quadro fx4800 and 12GB of RAM)
    On a Blackmagic timeline HD 1080i MJPEG with filters of Auto Color, Fast Color Corrector and Gamma correction a 2 minute timeline would encode in 2 minutes give or take a couple of seconds.
    Now with CS5.5 and Mtx 5.5 an identical file takes 11 minutes to encode to Microsoft avi - Matrox 1920 x 1080i - 25fps.
    If I remove the filters (which I need to be able to use) it will come down to 2 minutes as it used to be.....so it seems to be the filters are now slowing things down when they never used to. I have never rendered before exporting. Ever. So this time I tried rendering first and it brought the 11 minutes down to 7 minutes but when taking into account the 4 minutes rendering time I am no better off.
    I have updated CS5.5 to CS 5.5.1 and MTX Utils to 5.5 and then 5.5.1 and it makes no difference. Still 11 minutes to decode 2 minutes with three filters, which is exactly what I have always been doing but now it doesn't work....
    Can anybody help? or make a suggestion as to why using filters in 5.5 now multiplies the encode time by 5 when it never used to. Everything else bar Matrox Utils on this machine is as it was before the upgrade to 5.5 and as I say my older machine is still 5.03 it can do it all in 2 minutes even with the filters intact.
    So have I really spent a small fortune upgrading to make my output 5 times slower. Not happy......

    To go further, every single encode that I have done is slower than it was before with CS5.01 or 5.03.
    This is odd because going from Blackmagic to any other codec doesn't necessarily need the Matrox box or Matrox utils
    Blackmagic HD or SD to
    Matrox HD
    QT HD MP4
    QT SD DV25
    DV AVI SD
    Mpeg2 - DVD
    Every single encode is slow by 2x to 6x.
    Why should Blackmagic HD to QT MOV MP4 take twice as long as it used to...... having said that The speeds I am seeing now are what it was like before I attached the box in the first place, whether a Matrox codec was involved or not.... It is acting like a blocked funnel. when it used to be a lovely wide and clear funnel.
    Anyway Matrox have reproduced the problem and are investigating, so hopefully there will be an answer soon....

  • After upgrading from acrobat 9.5 to XI pro my users have complained on slow typing when filling in form that were created in version 9.5?

    After upgrading from acrobat 9.5 to XI pro my users have complained on slow typing when filling in form that were created in version 9.5?
    The issue is they type but there is 2 second delay when it appears in the field.
    Windows 7 64bit

    I see, I misread your reference to Reader 11 to mean you were using Acrobat 11, but it looks like it worked out anyway.
    The base-14 fonts are special in PDF because they are guaranteed to be available even if they are not embedded. If you select a non-base-14 font for use with a form field, the entire font usually gets embedded, since each glyph it contains has to be available for use with the field. This can take up a lot of space if you do this a lot, and the space isn't reduced if you change back to a base-14 font later because the internal reference to it is not removed. This is caused by the bug I mentioned.
    In your case, however, the entire font doesn't get embedded because fonts like it (e.g., large asian fonts with a lot of glyphs, Arial Unicode) would take up too much space if fully embedded. If it did, a 100KB PDF could bloat to 20MB with that one change. Instead, users are expected to have such fonts installed on their system, which is why you were prompted to install the font pack. This despite the fact that the font was not actually used by anything in your document, it was simply the orphaned reference to it that triggered this. This should get fixed in Acrobat eventually so this type of thing doesn't happen again.

  • After upgrading from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion, the text preference, Middle Eastern, causes Photoshop CS6 to slow down.  Can this be fixed?

    After upgrading from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion, and setting the text preference, Middle Eastern, causes Photoshop CS6 to slow down.  Can this be fixed?

    I'm Win, not Mac, but I do have a couple saved messages
    Mac 10.8.3 Bug w/Encore and BluRay http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1198709
    -create folder not ISO http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1216127

  • Internet Speed slowed to 56k when i get home from work.

    From 6pm pacific to 11 pm every night my internet is very erratic. going from 0-1mbps. When i use the tech support they always accelerate the issue and tell me i will get a call from someone else. Everytime i tell the tech support they have to call me after 6pm pacific time. The tech say ok they will call me after 6pm. I then about a week later have always gotten a call back at 3 pm during my work hours. Then they tell me there is nothing wrong with my internet its looking fine. I cant talk to them because im at work and tell them to call me back after 6. They usually say ok and i dont get a call back. WHen the tech support do there scripted testing it always shows im getting the right amount of speed but im still getting a download speed thats compatible to 56k.

    Sorry to hear about the speed troubles. So we can get more information from you, I have copied your post to our private support board. Please refer all correspondences to there from here on out. You can easily get to the private support one of two ways. In the email you signed up for the forums with, you will receive a link to click on. Make sure you are already signed into the forums before clicking on this link. Another way of getting there is by clicking on your username anywhere you see it in the forums. This brings you to your account profile. Scroll down to the section labeled "My Support Cases" . In there you will see the link to your case.
    Anthony_VZ
    **If someones post has helped you, please acknowledge their assistance by clicking the red thumbs up button to give them Kudos. If you are the original poster and any response gave you your answer, please mark the post that had the answer as the solution**
    Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or plan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Dual Remote VPN Connection

    Hello Guys i created three different Remote VPN connections with three different networks . i can make them one but for some reasons i don't mix all. and iam using  Cisco asa 5505 with Shrew Soft VPN software , so my problem is - i connected Shrew so

  • A few questions

    Hi there, I bought a Macbook 13" 1.8Ghz CD, 512M RAM, 60GB HDD just over 18 months ago. I then bought an iMac 2.33 C2D, 2GB RAM about a year ago. I am considering upgrading from my Macbook to a Macbook Pro but I just want to make sure it is worth it.

  • Simultaneously triggered acquisition: Multiple PXIe-7962R + NI-5734 cards, across multiple PXIe-1085 chasses

    Hi all, I need to do high-frequency, high-channel-count acquisition. Specs Signals: 10 MHz, 60 channels Controller: PXIe-8135 (Windows 7) Chasses: PXIe-1085 (2x) Input cards: PXIe-7962R FlexRIO base with NI-5734 digitizer (15x) Description Each FlexR

  • QM & MRP table

    hi all,           for some process problem. we remove 01 MIC from material master. that time purchase time department alrady rasied PO against the manterial. now when we are doing gr. material is showing in quality inspection lotin MMBE but in QA32 i

  • Why supplier needs to be maintained twice in COMMPR01 for interlinkage?

    Hi Everyone, if I want to create an interlinkage in COMMPR01 (price-product-vendor-relationship), I need to maintain the vendor twice. Once within the tab "conditions" and once within the tab "relationships". Does onyone out there have a clue, if the