Withdraw Field level RETRO for IT-0021

Hi,
Please let me know, is there any impact on Payroll (Indian) in case Field level RETRO is withdrawn for IT-0021
G.V.Mohan Rao,sCCL

IT 0021 is Dependent on.....Subtypes

Similar Messages

Best way to author field level help for a CHM?

Hi
I have been asked to create an HTML help (CHM) system for a .Net application which will include context sensitive help at both page and field level.
I have used map ids for page level help before - i.e. assigned a map id to topics and given this list to a developer for implementation, but I have never created field level help.
I've been looking at the 'What's This?' help project wizard but am confused as to whether this is the best approach and how it fits with the project as a whole (or even if it compatible with .Net applications). Does this mean that I need two help projects for the application - one for the main help, and one for the field level help? Is there a way to create field level help without using the 'What's This?' wizard?
I am using Robohelp 7.
Any advice gratefully received!
Chloe

Hi, Chloe,
As Peter notes, even Microsoft has backed away from using field-level Help in the last few years, so it may be worth trying to determine whether your users will benefit from having it available to them. That's not to say that you can't deliver field-level Help, however, as all the required methods for calling it are still available to .NET developers.
To clarify, what Madcap Software calls "DotNet Help" is just a proprietary Help viewer that the company hopes will be more modern and appealing to writers than the older HTML Help (.chm) viewer. HTML Help remains the recommended format for Windows applications, whether .NET or not, and you can use any authoring tool that is capable of outputting a .chm file to create online Help for a .NET application.
The method that your developers use to call field-level Help determines how it should be authored. If they use the standard .NET method (the SetHelpString method of the HelpProvider class), each text string is embedded in the application code itself, and not retrieved from your .chm file. More information here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.helpprovider.sethelpstring(VS .71).aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/821777
http://helpware.net/mshelp2/demo2/h1xNET.htm
Alternatively, developers can use the old HTML Help API to retrieve the text string from a .chm file. See:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms670082(VS.85).aspx
http://helpware.net/htmlhelp/how_to_whatsthis.htm
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=317406
The drawback of both methods is that the Help popups are plain text only — no graphics, text formatting, hyperlinks, etc. To work around this, some people use the third-party KeyHelp control to create feature-rich HTML popups. See:
http://www.keyworks.net/keyhelp.htm
This allows you to deliver the type of Help that you mentioned in your second message ("is there a way to do this so that these topics open in a small popup, without the TOC / tri-pane structure?").
Pete

Field level validations for an Infotype

Hi,
Can anybody tell me if field level validations can be done for each and every field in a HR infotype?
Thank you.

You can do most of the validations using the Infotype User exit ZXPADU02 or the AFTER_INPUT mrthod in the BAdI HRPAD00INFTY.
But each & every field -- NO
~Suresh

We need to give field-level authorization for some fields

The schenario is as follows :
1. There are various storage locations within a plant.
2. There is one or more people incharge of creating PO and receiving
stocks for every storage location.
3. We dont want to authorise the person incharge of one storage
location to receive stock in another storage location or even view the
other storage locations at the time of creating the PO or any other
transaction. The user incharge of one storage location should not be
able to view any other storage location in any storage location field's
drop down.
regards
Manish
+91 9811647727

Hi Umesh,
Please see the documentations for authorization profile P_ABAP in the R/3 library and the following:
SU03 -> HR Human resources -> position your cursor to P_ABAP HR: Reporting -> choose button "Docu." -> the pop-up "help - P_ABAP" appears.
There is an example, which describes a similar issue regarding RPTIME00 and the Basic pay infotype (0008).
The standard reports of personnel administration are based on logical database PNP I would recommend to set your authorization as follows:
Object HR: Master data (P_ORGIN) (two authorizations)
Infotype                  0002             ' '
Subtype                   *                ' '
Authorization level       R                ' '
Organizational key        ' '              0001YYYYXXX
Object HR: Reporting (P_ABAP)
Report name                SAPDBPNP
Degree of simplification   1
Please note, that if a user has authorization for e.g. the birthday list , (s)he will be able to view the birth date through thisquery, although (s)he cannot access to IT0002 through PA20.
Another possibility would be using Customer-Specific Authorization Object P_NNNNN. I have attached a file with a very comprehensive documentation regarding HR authorizations. P_NNNNN is documented on pages 40 ff.
Hope this help
Sarah

Field level Authorization for IT0002

Hi All,
We have a requirement to control the authorization for the field NI Number/Social Security number from IT0002.
This field is getting displayed in various standard reports which are in use by administrators/Managers etc....
We want to disable the access of this field to every one, even the HR administartor.
Kindly suggest if this is possible using authorizations.
I know that we can hide the field in display access for PA20 or PA30, but I am particularly serching the option for various reports.
Regards,
Umesh Chaudhari.

Hi Umesh,
Please see the documentations for authorization profile P_ABAP in the R/3 library and the following:
SU03 -> HR Human resources -> position your cursor to P_ABAP HR: Reporting -> choose button "Docu." -> the pop-up "help - P_ABAP" appears.
There is an example, which describes a similar issue regarding RPTIME00 and the Basic pay infotype (0008).
The standard reports of personnel administration are based on logical database PNP I would recommend to set your authorization as follows:
Object HR: Master data (P_ORGIN) (two authorizations)
Infotype                  0002             ' '
Subtype                   *                ' '
Authorization level       R                ' '
Organizational key        ' '              0001YYYYXXX
Object HR: Reporting (P_ABAP)
Report name                SAPDBPNP
Degree of simplification   1
Please note, that if a user has authorization for e.g. the birthday list , (s)he will be able to view the birth date through thisquery, although (s)he cannot access to IT0002 through PA20.
Another possibility would be using Customer-Specific Authorization Object P_NNNNN. I have attached a file with a very comprehensive documentation regarding HR authorizations. P_NNNNN is documented on pages 40 ff.
Hope this help
Sarah

Field Level Mapping For OCDM Release 11.3.2

Hi Everybody,
We are implementing a EDW using OCDM For a telco operator.Our major issue is that we don't have a column description/mapping for the OCDM tables.I had a link to the following patch which had the columnar documentation for a previous release(11.2.3)https://support.oracle.com/rs?type=patch&id=9450986
Can anybody point to towards a corresponding solution for the current release?
Thanks In Advance,

Please read the documentation:
Downloading and Extracting Client Installers
Installing Individual EPM System Clients
Installing EPM System Clients from EPM Workspace
Launching Clients
Cheers
John

E-Recruitment - Requisition - Infotype Field Level Change Log

Hi Experts,
We are implementing SAP E-Recruitment, and would like to know how to capture the changes made in Requisition at infotype field level.
For example: If a support team member is added/delete in the Requisition (Tab - Support Team), then these changes (NEW/DELETE) at the infotype field level are required.
I have tried to maintain the infotype and the required fields in V_T582A, V_T585A, V_T585B and V_T585C. But didnt get any result when I executed the report RPUAUD00. Is there any additional configuration required for this?
Please adivse.
Thanks and Regards,
Dinakaran R

Hi,
You can just to that with the infotype table log. Support team is stored in table HRP5131.
Regards,
Nicole

Field level Validation in SAP PI

Hi All,
I am integrating with a 3rd Party system (File to Proxy scenario). Source file contains around 30 fields. I was asked to do field level validations for each of this field in PI. Is this a good practice. Do we do field validation in PI Integration development? I think PI should contain more of integration logic than field level validations. Please suggest.
Also out of all the 30 fields few are numeric, some are text and some are dates. While creating data types do I need to created all as string or based on their nature I need to use integer,date etc? Please suggest which is the best practice.
Thanks.

I agree with Rahul.
Yes we can perform validation in PI (most of the cases we do by request of the Business team).
But always have a thumb rule for your self.
1. Check first weather the source system is capable of doing the validation at its end.
2. If YES make sure the source system does the validations required. (I am sure most of the app would be able to the validation).
3.If NO then accept the validation process to be done in PI end.
One Important thing:
What kind of validation are you taking about? i assume this is field level validation rite?
and this is a Proxy to file scenario rite.
I will strongly suggest you to do following things at source and receiver Business systems.
1.gather a meeting the with the end business teams (source and receiver).
2.Force them to create data type at their end (sorce and target)with same data type structure- with same field length even.
ie, if source first field is integer with maxlen25 corresponding reciver field is also integer with maxlen25, if source has char field then in reciver also its char.
If you make both the source and reciever business to have same data type at there end, NO VALIDATION would be required to be done in PI
also in this case you can declare all the data type as STRING in PI and pass the data to receiver system. (which has the same data type as sender).
Regards,
Senthilprakash.

Authorisation object for field level

Hi all,
In support desk ,Is there any authorisation object for controlling field level changes such as category or priority by message processors.
Balamurugan

Hi.
Not that I know of. I was also looking for something like this and could not find anything.
I think there is even no logging if someone makes any changes to those fields.

Field Status control for fields at Account assignment level .

Hi All ,
I have to take care of enabling / disabling / hiding / making fields mandatory for some of the standard and custom fields for SC and PO depending on the Account assignment value .
I am not sure how to go about this .
I think this has to do something with the field status control .
SPRO -> IMG -> SRM sever -> cross application basic settings -> extension and field control ( personalization ) -> Configure control for fields of substructure .
I think i have to define some dyn class and also methods .
But not sure how to move ahead , how to declare class / methods , which super class to use , how will i get the req parameters for the methods , ...
Will appreciate a lot if somebody can guide me on this .
Regards,
Ambar Patil.

Hi ,
Check in SPRO for SRM -> Extensions and Field Control (Personalization) -> Configure Field Control.
The metadata configuration for enabling disabling actions/fields in SRM can be checked from the tables
This contains the data for all the business objects
Check in SM30 the following views:
/SAPSRM/V_MDA_HD for Header actions
/SAPSRM/V_MDA_IT for Item Actions
/SAPSRM/V_MDF_HD for header fields
/SAPSRM/V_MDF_IT fir IT fields.
You can customize your logic for enabling diabling the actions or fields by maintaining the entries in the corresponding customer views for this data
for e.g.
/SAPSRM/V_MDF_HC for header customer fields
/SAPSRM/V_MDF_IC for item customer fields
You need to maintain field enabled, disabled ,required based on your requirement.
Regards,
Neeraj

Help: what meaning of some fields in INSTALL [for install] fields ?

Hi all,
I don't understand some fields in Data field of INSTALL [for install] command.
There is section *"A.1.1.4.2.1 -     Toolkit Applet Specific Parameters "* of specification +3GPP TS 23.048 V5.9.0+
*Presence         Length          Name*
Mandatory         1                  Length of Access Domain field
Mandatory         1-p          Access Domain (see A.1.1.4.2.3)
Mandatory         1                  Priority level of the Toolkit applet instance (see A.1.1.4.2.4)
Mandatory         1                  Maximum number of timers allowed for this applet instance
Mandatory         1                  Maximum text length for a menu entry
Mandatory         1                  Maximum number of menu entries allowed for this applet instance
Conditional                /     Position of the first menu entry ('00' means last position)
Conditional               |          Identifier of the first menu entry ('00' means don't care)
Conditional
                           |     ….
Conditional               |          Position of the last menu entry ('00' means last position)
Conditional                \     Identifier of the last menu entry ('00' means don't care)
Optional         1                  Maximum number of channels for this applet instance
Optional         1                  Length of Minimum Security Level field
Conditional     0-q          Minimum Security Level (MSL) (see A.1.1.4.2.5)and more description like this:
The position of the new menu entries is an absolute position among the existing ones.
A part of the item identifier shall be under the control of the card system and the other
part under the control of the card issuer. Item identifiers are split in two ranges:
-     [1,127] under control of the card issuer;
-     [128,255] under the control of the toolkit framework.
If the requested item identifier is already allocated, or in the range [128,255], then the
card shall reject the install command. If the requested item identifier is '00', the card shall
take the first free value in the range [128,255].These pair fields *"Position of the first menu entry ('00' means last position)"* and
*"Identifier of the first menu entry ('00' means don't care)"*.
What purpose do these fields describe? Let give some example for me!
Thanks,
HoaND
Edited by: hoaibaotre on Oct 27, 2011 10:21 AM

You give us no clue about what you used to record/playback scripts

How to fix the field level Error(Invalid Date)

Hi All,
Error: 1 (Field level error)
  SegmentID: ACK
  Position in TS: 5
  Data Element ID: ACK05
  Position in Segment: 5
  Data Value: 162014
  8: Invalid Date
can anyone help me out, How to fix above error? i searched about this but only information about the error is given and no where it is mentioned how to fix it and how is it generated please help me out.
Thanks,
Nitish

Are you sending or receiving the EDI?
Either way, "162014" is simply not a valid EDI data format. Dates in x12 are expressed as CCYYMMDD so December 30, 2013 would appear as 20131230.
If you are receiving, you need to contact the sender and have them correct the output.
If you are sending, you need to property format that date value. For example:
myDateVar.ToString("yyyyMMdd");

Data conversion is necessary at field level

Hi everybody.
Im a BW consultant in a BCS project, and I had to make a change in a objetct that is used in BCS as a custom attribute.
What I made, is to remove the ALPHA routine in the object.
Later, the BCS consultant generetad the data basis again, and now when enter the UCWB a warning is showed, the message below:
But I dont know how to do the procedure showed in the message, does anyone face with the same problem? Any suggestion?
Best Regards,
Thiago
Field /BIC/ZC_EMPBPM: Data conversion is necessary
Message no. UGMD418
Diagnosis
Following a change to the definition of field /BIC/ZC_EMPBPM it is necessary to convert the old data for this field before the new attributes can be activated. This arises, for example, when the following attributes have been changed:
Conversion exit
Version or time dependency of hierarchies
System Response
You cannot start the application. A data conversion is necessary first.
Procedure
Execute the necessary data conversion at the field level. To do this, press the respective button with the symbol in the hierarchical detail display at the level of field /BIC/ZC_EMPBPM. If necessary, the system will prompt you for more information in a separate dialog box.
Regards!
Edited by: Thiago França Carvalho Silveira on Jun 10, 2010 11:13 PM

Hi,
I quess the following should help.
Execute UCWB01 t-code, goto your data basis, in the tabstrip for assigning roles drag and drop any characteristic, then save. The system will find the change and check and regenerate data structures (that's what you need).
Then either in UCWB or UCWB02 t-code got your ConsArea and regenerate it.

Field Level Authorisation Control

Hi Expert,
i want field level authorisation control for Usage Probablity in Bill of Material. In CS02- Change Material BOM for some user i want to restrict to change the usage probablity of particular component.
how to do this. i already tried through creating & adding authorisation object in Role but it's not working.
Pls suggest solution with detailed steps.
Regards,
Dev

Dev,
You can better try using, transaction variants using transaction SHD0 and assign them to the respective users.
You can do a search in this forum to find topics on how to create transaction variants.
Regards,
Prasobh

Error during transport-Structure change at field level (convert table /BIC)

Hi,
I am trying to transport from DEV to Test when I encountered this error.
The tables are both consistent when I checked with SE14.
Start of the after-import method RS_CUBE_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) CUBE (Activation Mode)
Error/warning in dict. activator, detailed log > Detail
Structure change at field level (convert table /BIC/DZCRUSDI026)
Table /BIC/DZCRUSDI026 could not be activated
Return code..............: 8
Following tables must be converted
DDIC Object TABL /BIC/DZCRUSDI026 has not been activated
Error when activating InfoCube ZCRUSDI02
Error/warning in dict. activator, detailed log > Detail
Structure change at field level (convert table /BIC/DZCRUSDI023)
Structure change at field level (convert table /BIC/FZCRUSDI02)
Table /BIC/DZCRUSDI023 could not be activated
Table /BIC/FZCRUSDI02 could not be activated
Return code..............: 8
Following tables must be converted
DDIC Object TABL /BIC/DZCRUSDI023 has not been activated
Error when resetting InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 to the active version
How do I resolve this
thanks

Hi,
There are no Inactive objects in the cube in DEV system. Also must of the changes I made in Test are already in the cube in TEST But the cube is not active.
SAP proposed that the cube be activated manually but is not a good procedure to activate in TEST system.
Error when resetting InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 to the active version
Message no. RSO410
Diagnosis
Errors arose when activating InfoCube ZCRUSDI02. An active version already existed before the activation.
System Response
InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 could not be reset to the old active version. Since the generated objects no longer correspond to the old active version, they were reset to inactive.
Procedure
The old active version of InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 can no longer be used. Remove the cause of the activation error and activate InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 anew.
thanks

Withdraw Field level RETRO for IT-0021

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for