Withdrawal Qty don't match between ECC and APO

Hi Experts.
I am facing a discrepancy for Withdrawal Qty between ECC and APO before delivery/PGI creation.
In ECC T.code MD63 I am able to see the withdrawal Qty as expected but in APO a duplicated withdrawal Qty is being created. But this is not happening for all materials, only some specifics materials. I did a check in Material Master data and I have no found any difference between a material that is working and one that is not working...
Can please somebody explain me why APO is dobling the Withdrawal Qty.
Thanks a Lot
Daniel Campos.

Please check wthether you have dp index duplication in this problem.
Please follow the process.
For this process , you need to follow these steps .
1. From the table /SAPAPO/MATKEY , find the product id of the product for which you feel there is problem .
2. Find the location id from table /SAPAPO/LOC for the location.
3. Use the above found 'product id' and 'location id' to find the dp index in table "/SAPAPO/DP_HEAD " .
Enter the planning version ' 000 ' in this table . If there is some error you will find multiple entries of the 'dp index ' in this table for the ' 000 ' planning version. If error found use below program to delete the dp index .
4. Precaution should be taken before we delete the 'Dp Index' as the consumption history is lost due to this . In the program 'Z_DEL_WITHDRAWL' there are 2 check boxes " update " and " list ". List will show the DP index and update will delete it. Need to extremely careful in this program as wrong selection will cause problem .

Similar Messages

Colors don't match between PS and AI (CS 3)

CMYK images are displaying differently for me between PS and AI. In PS when they look "good" (and print similarly on my profiled Epson), in AI they look more contrasty and saturated, with a little color shift in the greens (towards blue).
My monitor is calibrated with a Monaco Optix, and I notice the difference between apps both on it and on my MacBook Pro screen.
Image profile is the standard SWOP v2. In AI, the document profile is SWOP v2. "Proof Colors" is unchecked in both apps. (If I check it, by default AI is radically different because it defaults to simulating black ink. Disabling this causes Proof Colors to have no visual effect.)
I asked this already in the AI forum, and the answer I got is basically "they should match, they do for me". I noticed elsewhere on this forum that AI and PS were different in color management, or rendering, or something, but didn't see much info beyond that.
I figured there were enough color hounds on this forum to set me straight.
- Bob

With a properly calibrated and profiled monitor, and with correct color settings in both programs, trust Photoshop's colors over Illustrator's.
This may have changed in CS4, but in CS3 Illustrator hadn't caught up with Photoshop in regard to color management.

How can we synchronize UOM between ECC and APO?

Hi,
We have configured new UOM (unit of measurement) in ECC. How can we synchronize UOM in APO with UOM in ECC (table T006)?
Thanks and regards, Jose Oyon.

Jose,
Synchronizing the config is simple. Run program RSIMPCUST in SCM.
Synchronizing changes to affected master or transactional data (if required) is much more complex. The best method by far is to create the new UOM config in ECC, and synchronize the config into SCM. Only then do you begin to use the new UOMs in ECC Master data and ECC transactional data. Existing transactional data, depending on what is is, will be very difficult to change UOMs and have the UOMs in SCM synch, without quite a bit of manual effort.
Rgds,
DB49

Issue in CIF data between ECC to APO

Hi Experts,
We have ECC and APO system in our landscape. we have configured CIF and transferred data between ECC and APO however after ECC system refresh CIF configuration is not working. we verified and reconfigured the CIF configuration but still no luck.
strange thing is, while sending the data for e.g vendor from ECC to APO, there is no error reported. It displays successful in both qRFC trace files but the transferred data is nt reflecting in APO system.
There is no system run time error, no errors in system log (SM21), no logs in SLG1 application log, no erros in qRFC trace files.
we have enabled RFC user trace but can't conclude the issue. could you please anyone let me know where we can check the error log or how to resolve this?
Outbund Queue logs from ECC:
QTYPE :OUTBOUND/S
DATE       TIME     CLIENT     USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB       QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:44:56 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N          N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7                                       SENDING
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                      QTYPE :OUTBOUND/S
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:44:57 00:00:01 300          20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7                                       CONFIRMD
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                      QTYPE :OUTBOUND/S
DATE       TIME     CLIENT     USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB       QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:44:57 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N          N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8                                       SENDING
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                      QTYPE :OUTBOUND/S
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:44:57 00:00:00 300          20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8                                       CONFIRMD
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Inbound Queue trace log from APO:
QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     CLIENT     USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB       QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 300                20.03.2015 17:44:56 N          N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7                                       SENDED
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 17:39:48 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7                                       FINISH
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     CLIENT     USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB       QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 300                20.03.2015 17:44:56 N          N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8                                       SENDED
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 17:39:48 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8                                       FINISH
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C2559         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7      RUNNING
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C2559         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7      FINISH
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C2559         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E7      CONFIRMD
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_LOC_INBOUND
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C255A         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8      RUNNING
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C255A         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8      FINISH
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
                                       QTYPE :INBOUND
DATE       TIME     EXETIME CLIENT USER            QDATE      QTIME    BJOB    QEVENT
        TID                              ORGTID                        QSTATE
    DEST                                    ERRMESS
20.03.2015 17:39:48 00:00:00 300             20.03.2015 17:44:56 N       N
        0A1A019D23F8550C0E0C255A         0A1A01720F70550C0F4019E8      CONFIRMD
    <SID>CLNT300
LUWCNT   QNAME                    FNAM
00000001 CFLDSHQCLNT300_0014      /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT
Thanks and regards,
Pradeep

Hello Pardeep,
Please check the setting of SMQS and SMQR for CF and client registration
these entries, the field 'TYPE' is set to 'R'.
QIN scheduler may be available for every client if you are working in this client with registered inbound queues.
Choose Edit->Activate scheduler from the menu (available in both SMQR and SMQS)
During processing in dialog work processes, the system uses a parallel RFC to restart the registered inbound queues. For this, you can use transaction RZ12 to specify a group of application servers and dialog work processes that are allowed to use a QIN scheduler. You must use transaction SMQR to assign the group name to the relevant QIN scheduler.
Different parameters in SMQR are explained in note 1579728. The explanation for SMQS is similar
Also try the report RSQIWKEX
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Data Inconsistency for 0EMPLOYEE between ECC and BI

Hi,
We do a full load to 0EMPLOYEE using 0EMPLOYEE_ATTR from ECC. There were records deleted for lot of employees (some action types) in ECC. This has caused data inconsistency for 0EMPLOYEE master data (time-dependent) between ECC and BI. In BI we have more records for these employees (Additional records have time-dependent range that were deleted from ECC but still exist in BI). These employee records are already being used in lot of InfoProviders. Is there an efficient way to fix this issue? One of the solution is to delete data from all InfoProviders and then delete from Master data for 0EMPLOYEE, but the deletion of employee records can happen quite often, so we don't want to take this route. Also, I tried to re-organize master data attributes for 0EMPLOYEE through process chain, but that didn't work either.
Message was edited by:
Ripel Desai

Hi Ripel,
I share your pain. This is one of the real pains of Time-Dependant master data in BW. I have been in your exact position and the only way round the issue for me was to clear out all the cubes that used 0EMPLOYEE and then delete and re-load 0EMPLOYEE data.
I know this responce doesn't help you but at least you are not alone.
Regards,
Pete
http://www.teklink.co.uk

TS1925 iPad IOS 7.0.2 and Mountain Lion 10.8.5 Calendar colors do not match between computer and device. Problem did not exist until updated IOS arrived. Colours change of their own free will despite being corrected on both iPAD and MacBook Pro. Any an

iPad IOS 7.0.2 and Mountain Lion 10.8.5 Calendar colors do not match between computer and device. Problem did not exist until updated IOS arrived. Colours change of their own free will despite being corrected on both iPAD and MacBook Pro. Any answers?

Please do not post the entire messages log as it takes up unnecessarily a lot of space. It seems that there is a corrupt/nonfunctional file called
[email protected]nt.plist
Go to your hard drive, enter library, go into users, and go into launch agents and delete the thing above. Empty the trash and restart.

Communication between ECC and CRM

Hello,
I am in phase of showing communication between SAP CRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0.
I am struggling with finding some simple transactions which are common in both, with which I can show correct connectivity between ECC and CRM.
I need to save some data from CRM and access the same via transaction within ECC, save some data via ECC and access it via CRM. I already established RFC link between ECC and CRM.
Probably communication between SD module of ECC with CRM.
Can you please help me out with this, a clue/correct direction will be of very helpful. Basically I want to know, what transaction I can use for same.
Any help is really appreciated.
Thanks
-Vishal

Hi Glenn,
I followed all steps in document mentioned above. In the end during execution of transaction I selected appropriate source and destination, when I click start transfer objects, it gets stuck in waiting phase.
Among those steps I was not able to perform step#10. Creating Subscriptions for OLTP. My ERP is not displaying this option under subscription wizard. Should it be reason for not starting transfer ? I also do not see ERP logon screen when I select transfer.
My another question is when transfer will complete, where I'll be able to see transferred objects within ERP database ?
Thanks
-Vishal

Communication between ECC and SCM via XI

I am trying to set up the scenario 'Purchase_Order_Processing' between
ECC and SCM using XI. The SCM content for XI has been loaded into XI
and this scenario is included in the content.
We are running the following:
ECC - Version 5.0 - 640 SP level 12
XI - Version 3.0 - 640 SP Level 14
SCM - 4.10 - 640 SP Level 12
The connectivity between the systems has been set up as described in the configuration guides. On sending an IDOC (basic type ORDERS05) into XI I get the following error message 'Http server code 500 reason Internal Server Errorexplanation Error during parsing of SOAP header'.
The Error XML is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30"
xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="PLAINHTTP_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_SERVER</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>500</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>Internal Server Error</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>Error during parsing of SOAP header</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Http server code 500 reason Internal Server Error
explanation Error during parsing of SOAP header</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Any assistance would be much appreciated.

Sravya,
Yes this an IDOC to http scenario. There was no dump at the receiver end. I've found out what was causing the problem - I was using an adapter type of HTTP. It should have been of type 'XI'. I've altered this and it works. Hopefully this will resolve your problem Vinod.
Richard

Block Demand Depend Interfaces between ECC and SCM

Hello All.
Is there a way to block only interfaces of Dependent Demand between ECC and SCM.
I need to do this because ECC writes over my plan in SCM.
Thanks and Best Regards

Hello PrasunM
For example:
When you create an Order on finished material, SCM using PP method "3 - Cover Ind. Requ." creates DepReq on raw material.
SCM using CIF sends PlOrd, PrdOrd and DepReq to ECC. I want send only PlOrd and PrdOrd, DepReq i only need in SCM side.
Best Regards.

Best communication between ECC and PI

Hi All
SAP is planning to adapt Enterprise Service Architecture (ESA) in the journey towards Service Oriented Architecture (SOA).
We are working on new implementation project. We have many asynchrounous scenarios. We would like to configure acknowledgements and also like to handle errors effectively.
Could you please suggest which communication between ECC and PI is preferrable?
(Webservices, IDoc, BAPI or RFC)
Thanks
Sai

IDoc, BAPI , rfc - all can be used for seamless communication between ECC and PI. It is totallu dependant on the application and way information is exchanged. For master and transactional data idoc are prefered as for the acknowledgements supported by it. Not sure how effeciently we can handle system and appl ack incase of bapi/rfc. but at the same time idoc will be a drawback for sync comunication where rfc/bapi is preferd. It is SOA or ESA the concepts build in SAP are targeted to serve the enterprise needs where idoc,bapi/rfc are used for servicing the business unit objectives

IDocs have disappeared between ECC and PI

Hi All,
A couple of days ago 3 idocs went missing between ECC and PI.
That day 293 idocs of the same message type were sent to the same partner through PI. In PI we only found 290. The 3 IDocs were sent in the same second in the early afternoon. All IDocs before and after were processed correctly.
The IDocs are unknown in IDX5 and in Runtime Workbench on PI.
The idocs were not in SM58.
I found them in WE05, with the correct status. The status update from status = 01 to 30 to 03 took place in the same second.
25 seconds later, new IDocs of the same message type were created and processed successfully by PI.
At the time the idocs disappeared there were no problems with either ECC or PI, as far as we know.
The interface is live for more than 2 years. In the meantime no changes have taken place.
I have read the links below
Finding missing IDocs
Interface Troubleshooting Basics
It's a mystery to me. Where have those idocs gone?
Anybody any idea?
Kind Regards
Edmond Paulussen

Hi Edmond,
On the SAP PI system have a look in transaction IDX5. Take the IDoc number that you could not find in PI and search them in IDX5.
If you cannot find those IDoc in IDX5 then they never reached PI.
Regards,
Jannus Botha

Optimize the performance of the RFC call between ECC and CRM

Hi,
We are planning to extract sales orders, sales activites and service orders to dispaly it on the PDF factsheet of the account.
As of now, the PDF factsheet takes a long time to retrieve the data from ECC to CRM. Can you please suggest us on ways to optimize the performance of the RFC call between ECC and CRM.
Thanks in advance,
Vamsi.

Hello,
[SAP Note 636906 |https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/636906]is quite useful here.
Many times, the performance is poor due to function module CRM_CCKPT_EXPORTSUMMARY. This function module gets the customer number, the sales organization and the fact sheet view. If in CRM customizing, you use complete view (001), then all the views in ERP including all the info blocks will be retrieved, which will cause performance issue.
To solve the issue, please use a limited view to retrieve the data from ERP - especially a view, which does not contain info block 013.
Hope it helps
Joaquin

Difference Between ECCS and BCS

Hello Everyone
Can any one explain briefly the difference between ECCS and BCS.
Your response will be highly appreciated.
Regards.
DC

Quick answer: EC-CS is on the R/3 platform, while BCS is on the BI platform.
This topic has been discused numerous times - please search the forum for more details if required.

Any defference display icon between ecc and ecc6

Hi,
any defference between ecc and ecc6 to display ICON
my problem is i was run the one program in ecc then output shows with icons.
same program run in ecc6 output is same but ther is no icons like ecc
Regards
naresh

Hi
Good
Yes you could find some new icons in between ECC and ECC 6.0 but I dont think there is lots of difference between these two, though you have not mentioned the program name it is hard to give you the correct reply on that, but yes in some standard program cases you may find this kind of problems.
Thanks
mrutyun^

We are upgrading EHP4,What are the scenarios we will check in ECC and APO

Hi gurus,
We are upgrading (ECC )EHP4
What are the scenarios we will check in ECC and APO, kindly tell me gurus.
Regards
babu

Babu,
We live within a dream. The आत्मन् is real, all else is Illusion. Names are illusion. If DB49 does not suit you, then call me nameless.
Before you even release the software into the test environment, you must perform unit testing. Can every transaction that is used by your company be executed? Does every userexit/enhancement still perform the same task? Does every custom report work the same? All interfaces passing the proper data?
Merely testing the software itself will not give your company any assurance that it will support your business after you go live with it, so after unit testing comes integration testing and user acceptance testing. You must interview Key business users, and from their input you must develop and execute tests for 'business processes'. For example, one common business scenario (which contains many business processes), Order to Cash: Check whether your upgraded systems supports your ability to receive and enter an order, plan the parts, obtain the RM, build the parts ship the order, and book the cash. Or, another Scenario, Procure to Pay: Check if you can plan RM parts, create/release PR, create PO, send PO to Vendor, receive PO in stock, pay invoice, close month for accounting purposes.
These are two major business scenarios in most companies that use ERP. There are hundreds more that can be tested, If you work for a company that cannot afford to have any disruption in their business, then all activities that are normally done by any business user should be tested.
On the SCM side, during an ERP update, you have a smaller task (SAP usually does a good job with backward compatibility with their own modules). BW extractors must be tested. All integration models must be tested. All userexits must be tested. Publishing results/releasing results to ERP must be tested. The list goes on and on depending upon which SCM modules you have implemented.
Regards,
DB49

Withdrawal Qty don't match between ECC and APO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for