WITHHOLDING TAXES ON PROVISION

Hi Gurus
I have configured 4 witholding tax codes (1 for basic, 1 for surcharge, 1 for HE cess & 1 for SHE cess).
When I'm using tcode J1INUT for calcuclating WTH tax on provisions, i have option to enter only 2 tax codes.
Now please guide me on how to proceed further
Regards
Ganesh

hi,
apply the sap notes 1015410 and 1096515.
Raghav

Similar Messages

J1INPR - Withholding Tax on Provision

hi all
i am trying to post some values throu J1INPR, its not processing any data.
the configuration is complete
can anybody help me to clear this issue with all its option in step by step
regards
sallu c.mathew

Good morning.
This folder has been activated and the Withholding Tax have been inserted.
The problem is in receipt of compensation value without taxes.
Thanks.

Withholding tax provision on Po's at year End

Hi Experts
TDS has been deducted at the time of making provision on Po's at the year end but actual invoice receipt after payment of TDS in the next year , how the system will take care of TDS on differential amount , and what will happened if TDS has been deducted on provision entry and period has been closed but invoice is received before TDS deposited and corrective entry for differential amount is made in additional period.
On processing of those PO's invoices system will issue any msg that TDS on Provision is already deducted/deposited or not
I have made below config -
SPRO --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) --> Withholding Tax --> Extended Withholding Tax --> Posting --> India --> Provisions for Taxes on Services Received.
but while doing t_code j1inpr a error msg is coming-
Maintain Accounting configuration for W.Tax code 1000
please help
Regards
Kuldeep Dubey

Hi Kuldeep,
For this issue we were doing the invoices in current month which is pertaining to last year and make it the manual jv provision in local books and reverse in current month first. while updaing the challans we are excluding the previous invoices and posted seperate challan. certificates are issuing manually for old invoices while taking the current year certificates we are going to excluding the challan numbers in J1INCERT.

Withholding Tax (TDS) on provisions

Dear all,
Can you please let me know the procedure for reversing the TDS on provisions which is based on the provisions outstanding as on the year end.
We are able to achieve the dedution of TDS on provisions through the T-Code of J1INPR.
Afterwards, we normally book the vendors bill and deduct TDS on the same.
However as per the standard method we should run J1INUT to reverse the TDS payable which is credited at the time of booking the invoice.
But when we run the J1INUT in test run, system is giving the correct reference of the original entry of TDS on provision. But when we remove the tick of test run and then run J1INUT, system is giving the error of select the valid function.
Can you please guide how to handle such situation.
Regards
Dhirav Shah

Dear Mukthar,
I tried but its not working.During Payment system is adjusting TDS automatically which we paid on Advance but during payment,TDS on final payment is not clearing and not assigned amount is not getting zero.
Step 1: Advance Amount Rs 1000@ 2%
Step 2:Invoice Booked of Rs 5000,no TDS during Invoice booking but payment withholding Tax code was ticked during Invoice booking,as you suggested.
Note:Total Invoice value is Rs 5000 out of which Rs 1000 made as an advance.Please see-step 1.
Step 3:F-54 advance clearing against above Invoice
Step 4: Payment of Rs.4000 subject to TDS
Here is problem,system is calculating TDS on Rs 4000@2% which is correct but not assigned amount is not getting zero.
How to clear this?
Once you click on INR net 4,900 blue line,then amount entered gets 5000.
Now click on WH tax tab,which is showing everything correct. but question is how to clear Rs 80 and not assigned field make Zero.Which is our requirement. If not assigned become zero then issue resolved.
Hope you understand my problem.
If i click on difference posting and simulate then -Not assigned tab gets Zero but it create one open item with Document types-KZ, which again is a issue to clear and you cannot clear.And if you simulate it then system is reversing TDS on advance and final total TDS is crediting this time.Till here no issue. Here is simulation entry-
This you are able to get only once you click on difference posting but in FBL1N with document type KZ Rs 80 would be appear and that you cannot clear anyway.
Vendor Master detail:
Hope you understand my problem,if you run this scenario then you would have more clarity however I covered all process.
Regards,
Prasad

How to post a PARK document with Withholding Tax

Hi All,
I have parked a document using FB60.Vendor is subject to withholding tax.Now,when i am posting the document through FBV0,the error message displayed is :
"Field BSEG-SECCO does not exist in the screen SAPMF05A 0303".
The error message says that Section Code (Withholding Tax) is missing for Special G/L Indicator Line Item.I dont have provision to enter section code in the screen.
My entries are :
29J Vendor a/c Dr.
50 XYZ a/c
If i using F-02 and not parking ;then it is getting posted.
Note: Line Item is a special G/L Indicator
Please advise how to post a park document using FBV0 with special g/L Indicator and vendor is subject to withholding tax.

Hi Parag,
Section code field doesnot exist in the special G/L indicator line item of the document.So,i cannot enter it.
But,when posting the parked document ,it is asking for Section Code.
The error message displayed is:
"Field BSEG-SECCO. does not exist in the screen SAPMF05A 0303"

Withholding tax information

Hello Friends,
With respect to withholding tax Iu2019m facing difficulty to map the below user requirement.
User want to incorporate the withholding tax (WHT) information at purchase order level, but in the purchase order we can't find any such provision to input withholding tax information.
Standard system behavior is that if vendor is subject to WHT, WHT can be calculated at invoice verification level.
We have to cater the below 2 scenarios, guys please provide your expert advice on this:
1. WHT information is to be maintained at PO so that the person making VIV will not commit any error in selecting the tax code or will not make the invoice without inputting the relevant WHT information to avoid invoice being created without WHT on invoices subject to WHT.
2. In a purchase order there are more then one line items some are subject to WHT and some are not, we want to capture the WHT on the items liable for WHT.
We know that WHT is not calculated on item level it is calculated at header level on vendor.
Thanks

Hi Sapref,
1. WHT information is to be maintained at PO so that the person making VIV will not commit any error in selecting the tax code or will not make the invoice without inputting the relevant WHT information to avoid invoice being created without WHT on invoices subject to WHT.
Ans : What you want to ensure at the P.O. level is actually controlled at the Vendor master level and whichever P.O. you use.. if it is maintained in the vendor master, it will deduct TDS at the time of Invoice.. so there is no chance of committing any mistake.. if it is once maintained in vendor master data. Further there is no provision in SAP to maintain TDS Tax codes at the P.O. level
2. In a purchase order there are more then one line items some are subject to WHT and some are not, we want to capture the WHT on the items liable for WHT.
Ans : You are correct, that TDS is at the vendor level and not at the line item level. But Suppose you have an Invoice, which contains two line items, one on which TDS is to be calculated and the other on which TDS is not to be calculated, then at the header level in MIRO, you can enter the Witholding Tax Base amount and the TDS amount manually, and it will get calculated accurately.
Regards,
SAPFICO

How can I settle invoicing plan with defining withholding TAX Parameter

Dear All
         Please kindly help me to answer this question, How can I settle invoicing plan with defining withholding TAX Parameter.
I've already create PO Framework Order by specify Invoicing Plan Periodic automatic settlement.
        But, We can found with holding tax parameter on the tab of invoicing plan in PO.
       Please help me.

Hi,
From my understandinging in case of withholding tax there is no provision to manage from procurement side.
At the time of MIRO or payment run users have to select the applicable
withholding tax code ( During MIRO withholding tax pop up will appear).
Withholding tax is a component within FI: FI-AP-AP-Q
Regards,
Edit

Withholding tax Amount not being displayed in the Invoice while posting a Parked Document

Hi,
I have created a parked document for the Vendor who has the Witholding tax code w9 - 15% . I created Parked Document using FBV1 and then tried posting the same using FBV0.Somehow I am not getting the Withholding tax Amount in the FI Document created. However the W/Tax Base Amount and the W/ Base LC are being displayed correctly.
Say if the Line item Amount is 1,000$ then both the amounts mentioned above in the Additional tab "Withholding tax Data" are being displayed as 1,000 usd but the W/Tax Amount is 0,00 USD.
2. Also We have the PI and the Interface is written to post the Parked document while the xml file. There is a Method Execute_Asynchronous which has two BDCs one for FBV2 ( Change Parked Document ) followed by the Post Parked Document FBV0. Hence When I try to post the Parked Document using the SPROXY Interface which has two BDCs Viz FBV2 & FBV0 I still get the Invoice with the Same Amounts and at times with additional 2 zeros added to it in the Additionsal Tax Data Screen.
I am not sure what is the reason for this. Can anybody help me sort out this Issue.
Can there be any Config issues. Please let me know what all config Settings we need to do to sort out this Issue.
Also let me know why the 2 Zeros are getting added to the Base Amount e.g if the Vendor Line item is 12,000 USD it shows as 12,00000.00 in the Withholding tax Data Tab in the Invoice.
Regards,
Deepak.

Dear Praveen,
please check into IMG if You defined the WT type You are using for Your Comapny code:
IMG --> Assign Withholding Tax Types to Company Codes
I hope this helps.
Mauri

Vendor Open items upload- Withholding tax liable tick

Hi all
I have uploaded the Vendor open items. At the time of upload, Withholding tax was activated at the co code level. However, the liable to TDS tick was not checked. Now when I activate the liable tick and go to F-53 to pay the open items, I get an error of Items not activated due to Inconsistent Withholding tax. How do i resolve this error. I think there is a program which we need to execute to correct this. Can any1 help me with the program name?
Thxs in advance
Hrishi

RFWT0010 is a programme to run for Open items adjustment.
Let me know the result.
thanks
prabhakar

Withholding tax not able to view in FBL1N - Vendor Line Item report

Dear All,
The VI documents are posted in different vendors. The Tax code has been duly selected and tax was deducted at the time of posting the entry. When we generate the list of vendor line items using standard report FBL1N, we observe that only some of the VI documents in the output show the withholding tax amount in the respective column whereas in some of the VI documents, the withholding tax amount is appearing as zero even though the tax line item is available in the document (same can be seen in FB03).
Please let us know the possible cause for the same.
Regards,
Anand.Inguva

Dear,
by FBL1N is not possible to check the Extended WT
information due to the technical reasons explained into the note
number 363309.
Furthermore please be aware that by the report RFKQST00 and
RFIDYYWT You can have all the WT details.
I hope this helps You.
Mauri

How to clear line items with withholding tax manually

hi Experts,
i posted a vendor invoice with withholding tax and i made payment as well but not through f-58.
now i wanted to clear these two through f-44 but it gives the message withholding tax information ignored and didnt display the invoice as open item.
how do i clear both the trasactions
regards
suresh

hi Praisty,
thanks for the reply
i have a second opinion on your statement that no matter whatever tcode you use for payment it will clear the open item. Even in F-58, if u make partial payment it will not clear you open item. But i didnt use f-58 as i said earlier.
i used FBV1 for parking the document through which i entered the payment details...ofcourse it doesnt have the option for clearing the open items, cheque printing and it will not update your cheque register. i posted the parked document through FBV0. for all practical purposes, this is my payment document but it didnt clear my open item, in order to clear it i now used f-44.
regards
suresh

Withholding tax line items are not post

Hi,
I was configured all the steps for extended withholding tax up to Assign withholding tax to vendor master data
and the i am used to post an vendor invoice
given all required feild and press enrer and display the withhoding tax codes screen here also press enter button .... i entered all required field and go to simulation this posting i am getting only 2 line items
like for eg: --- Inventory Debit , Vendor Credit only
here my problem is i am not getting the all with holding tax line items
please hepl
Sree

Dear Sree,
if You defined the WT type at the payment time, the WT line items will be created at the payment time and not during the invoice posting.
Please check.
Mauri

Withholding Tax Calculation Error for Vendor Down Payment Clearing:Oct '09

Hi,
We are trying to incorporate the new Withholding Tax Structure w.e.f. 01-Oct-09.
There were 3 scenarios possible:
a. Invoice = Down Payment
b. Invoice < Down Payment
c. Invoice > Down Payment
While 1 & 2 were taken care of effectively, the third scenario did not work as expected. The scenario is as follows:
1. Down Payment (Date : 30/09/09)
Amt : Rs. 40000/-;
Withholding Tax @ 15% : Rs. 6000/- (40000 * 15%)
Surcharge @ 10% : Rs. 600/- (6000 * 10%)
Edu Cess @ 2% : Rs. 132 (Rs. 6600*2%)
Higher Edu Cess @ 1% : Rs. 66 (Rs. 6600*2%)
2. Invoice (Date : 02/09/09) - As per new TDS Rates
Amt : Rs. 50000/-
Withholding Tax @ 10% : Rs. 5000/- (50000 * 10%)
Surcharge : NIL
Edu Cess : NIL
Higher Edu Cess : NIL
3. DPC (Date : 02/09/09) - Reversal of TDS calculated in Down Payment (Step 1) above.
Issue:
While making J1INCHLN, amount is adjusted as Rs. -1000/- (hence zero) not payable.
Also, the Surcharge, Edu Cess & Higher Edu Cess are also getting reversed in DPC.
As suggested by SAP Note No. 1372734 - Handling of downpayment clearing scenarios after budget '09, the scenario does not seem to work.
Actual payable should be worked out as under:
Invoice : Rs. 50,000/-
DP : Rs. 40,000/-
Bal : Rs. 10,000/-
TDS @ 10% : Rs. 1,000/-
All TDS Challans, Certificates & Returns must reflect Rs. 1000/- in the Challan.
Require assistance.
Regards,
Kapil Tilwani

Hi Kapil,
The following needs to be taken care of -
The message controls settings as the note suggests must be set as W.
When entering the details the logic is Vendor Debit amount is Tax amount + 1
The Vendor credit line, the tax code has to be assigned with the advance amount (amount for which the challan has been created) as the tax base amount and the tax amount will be the extra liability that needs to be created.
In your example -
The tax amount will be - 2000 ( the debit at the time of downpayment clearing should have been 4000 instead of 6000)
Tax base amount - 40000 (Challan for this amount has already been made at the time of downpayment made)
The vendor Debit - 2001 (2000 + 1)
The vendor credit - 1
Note - Tax amount and base amount has to be made manually in the withholding Tax tab for the credit entry.
Please revert for any clarification.
Thanks and Regards,
Anit

Payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome

The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
FBZP.
Best regards,
Leonardo Vedovelli
FI Support Engineer
SAP Active Global Support

Withholding Tax by Line Item (not by vendor)

Hi,
Thereu2019s been more than 1 occasion where clients request for withholding tax at line items (purchase equipment and service in 1 invoice. Equipment no withholding tax but service has withholding tax). However, as far as I know, the withholding tax is applicable by vendor and not by line item of the vendor. Is there any workaround on this?
Regards,
Cheah

If i understand correctly, you have prepared PO for material plus service, service attracts WHT
you could prepare two different vendors - one for material, one for service - even though the vendor is same, and maintain WHT only in service vendor.
under PO there is condition types for service, there you can enter this second vendor who is providing service.
i think this way you issue should get resolved.
Pl share how to finally got thru it.
Thanks
Sanjay

WITHHOLDING TAXES ON PROVISION

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for