Witholding tax amount is not coming correct in FBL1N report.

The WHT amount in vendor line item report in column withholding tax is being displayed without a minus(-) sign indicating a debit amount, but this amount is in fact not a debit amount, when this column is sum up it gives incorrect total.
Regards
Abhisekh Mandal

Dear Abhisekh,
SAP note 363309 says,
"Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
from your display variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax' button."
(BSEG-QSSKZ, BSEG-QSSHB, BSEG-QBSHB) field is not relavent for
Extended withholding tax and not suppose to use in report FBL1N.
It basically does not make any sense to use the withholding tax fields
of the document line items (BSEG-QSSKZ, BSEG-QSSHB, BSEG-QBSHB) with the
activated extended withholding tax.
I'm sorry not to help You further.
Mauri

Similar Messages

FBL1( VENDOR LEDGER REPORT)- Withholding tax amount is not coming .

in FBL1 ( vENDOR lEDGER rEPORT) - WITHHOLDING TAX AMOUNT IS NOT CMING IN COLUMN QBSHB OF FBL1.
Purchasing document number is not coming also.
How these fields may appear in the above said report. Is any config missing ?
Thanks in advance
M K Agarwal
9967029930

TDS posted from MIRO will not reflect in line item report, i have taken opinion from SAP for the same issue few days back, SAP has given the following opinion.
*With reference to the difference in behaviour as compared to the document posted for example from MIRO which is an MM transaction and FB60 which is a FI transaction please note the following:
The withholding tax amount that you are using i.e. Field BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table WITH_ITEM.
Also note that MIRO does not give the user the control in case of Classical withholding tax. It only supports Extended withholding tax. Hence it does not populate BSEG fields in case of Extended WT.
So in MIRO, the data for extended withholding tax are saved within the table WITH_ITEM and not within the table entry BSEG-QBSHB. The latter isnot updated during the procedure. Furthermore it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way, as FBL1N only reads BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables.
In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actually the field of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows zero in line item display*
Please review note 363309 for detailed explanation and explains the functionality which is valid even for your release.
So it is not possible to display withholding tax information in the line item display transactions, since this information is not
held in the BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables, but is instead stored in the WITH_ITEM table.
Please convey to your client, standard SAP will not show the TDS information in line item reports, documents posted from MIRO and refer the note 363309.

Tax amount is not coming in print preview of PO

Hello Experts,
I am faicng problem that Tax amount is coming in print preveiw only when i click on Taxes button in invoice tab.
If i dont click on Taxes button it is not coming even though it is present in the PO.
Please help me out in this issue.

Hi,
This might be because of the CODE ISSUE either in the PROGRAM OR SMARTFORM .
Please cehck the code , if you dont have access check with the ABAPer to debgg and identify the issue.
regards,
santosh

Grand Total not coming correctly in Tabular report

Hi,
When I extract in Answers the following information:
Dimension 1
Dimension 2
Dimension 3
Metric 1 (sum)(sum i defined in RPD)
Metric 2 (count distinct)(count is defined in RPD)
When doing this, I get the right result for every value of the dimension, but the total of the summation metric is not correct in tabular report
Can someone help me, please?

Hi,
Try this........
Add this <ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled> somewhere inside your <ServerInstance> and </ServerInstance>
on instance config and restart the presentation services.
Cheers,
Aravind

TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019

Dear All,
I am Facing Following Problem in TDS
While creating an A/P Invoice after putting row level information when user click on u2018ADDu2019 button u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D opens for deduction of TDS amount. When user selects u201CWithholding Tax Codeu201D in u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D to deduct TDS amount for an invoice system shows WTax amount as per rate of deduction. But when user click on u2018OKu2019 to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D window, WTax Amount will comes as zero on A/P Invoice window.
Then when again user will go to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D and manually put the value of WTax Amount system reflects it on A/P Invoice window.
In case when we set approval procedure to A/P Invoice, this invoice goes for an approval. After coming back as approved invoice when originator of invoice going to u2018ADDu2019 the same document system shows an error as u2018TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
please reply me ASAP
Thanks & Regards,
Swapnil

hi
try this
We need to follow the following steps
u2022     Open the BP master for which TDS needs to be deducted go to the accounting tab followed by tax option and then click on the checkbox subject to withholding tax
u2022     Click on the option WTAX codes Allowed and select the TDS Category
u2022     On the previous window click the check box pertaining the checkbox u201CTDS OVERLOOKu201D
Regards,
Manish

Tax amount is not appearing in consumption history of earmarked fund

Dear Experts,
It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.
The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.
The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.
The funds management document was also correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.
The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.
Could you please help me with this problem?
Kind Regards,
Rui Neves

Hi,
Thanks for your answer. We are reimplementing the REFX solution for a company. The existing system is also in ECC6. For contracts made in existing system when periodic posting done, tax is shown against both contract and rental object. The value of periodic posting is same for both contract and rental object.
However, in the new implementation, tax amount is not appearing against rental rental object. Tax amount is appearing against rental contract. As a result, there is a difference in amount. Is this correct as a process ?
Regards,
T Saravanan

In fbl1n report for document type RE withholding tax amount is not showing

in fbl1n report for document type RE withholding tax amount is not showing
in sap note 363309 determines
Solution
Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information (field BSEG-QSSHB) from your display
variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on the document number and
subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'.
my doubt is we remove the field BSEG-QSSHB in layout how can show the withholding tax amount in FBLIN report
how to remove from the layout
please clarefy
bhayyapu

Hi,
If you want to check amounts of withholding tax for the vendors, you have some options to view it. You can access the WITH_ITEM, LFC1 tables by SE16. You have too the S_P00_07000134 report. This report is developed for the Colombia but I already used for the another country with the ABAP development for this country.
Also you can use table join BSIK and WITH_ITEM by SQVI for the open items and BSAK and WITH_ITEM for cleared items. It is more simple and fast.
JPA

Error Message FF747 -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

Hello,
We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
Best Regards
Amit Kulkarni

Hello
This may be a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like this to be posted along with the expense item

Item's withholding tax amount is not zero

Dear All,
When ever we clear the vendor account through f.13 system was showing the below mentioned message.
S No customer documents selected
S No G/L account documents selected
I Only accounts with debit and credit postings are included
X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 1
X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 2
I Stop date " 02.01.2010 Stop time " 17:00:00
Client is asking no need to show Items withholding tax amount is not zero message.
Where as the clearing criteria is business place .
Regards,
Teja

Hi,
please refer to the note 499902 and 442588 for the explanation why the transaction F.13 has given out
this error and which transactions (FBZ2 or F-53) should be used to clear the items with the withholding tax info maintained.
Reg
Madhu M

Tax Amount is not updated into BSEG

Dear All,
I have recently added a tax amount field MWSTS from table BSEG into FBL1N - Vendor Line Item Display. To my surprise the input tax amount is not updated into BSEG table. The input tax is normally posted using either MIRO or FB60.
Any one has the same problem? Can please kindly share how to fix the problem?
Thanks in advance for your kind assisstance.
rgds,
Dahlia

Thanks Andreas,
However I do believe that it should be updated into BSEG - MWSTS as we have mutliple companies in different countries in the system. All the other companies have the input rate updated into BSEG - MWSTS for the vendor line item, only the company for India is not updated.
Yes, BSET do have the tax amount updated but I can't use BSET table in FBL1N. I need to provide the tax amount information for each vendor line item in FBL1N.
thks
Dahlia

The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

Hi Experts,
User is trying to "Relase to Account" in t-code VF01 he is getting an error message The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
During Debuging i found the error is raised in Function module RV_ACCOUNTING_DOCUMENT_CREATE
Message raised is
Message Class : FF
Message number: 747
Mesage "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base"
Request to through some lights on this issue.
Reagrds
Sree

Hi,
did you check SAPNET notes with "VF01" and the message class/number as search terms. There are some notes dealing with this case eg 872449, and 184985.
Best regards, Christian

Amount is not coming into the Invoice for Warranty Order

Salute All !!
Amount is not coming into the Invoice for Warranty Order which is Free of Charge.
This amount is not going to Customers debtor A/C, means there is no any A/C posting for this specific Amount because this is free of charge Sale (Warranty Order).
This is required by A/C department to put Value in to the Invoice to show so Transporter can carry the material as 0 value material is unable to Transport.
Please provide solution.
Rgds
Srivastav
+91-9973504950

Hi,
Because you are not billing to customer the net amount is zero-
You can do like bill the component as regular item and give credit note against it.
or else create seperate billing output type assign this to proforma invoice- print the cost of item by pulling it in new smart form.
(this is not very good idea because , customer knows the actual cost of the item)
Thanks
Chidambaram

Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount

Hi All,
I'm importing AP invoices through Open Interface R12.
Lines includes Tax lines as well. But Invoices become held when I try to validate.
I'm getting this hold reason: "Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount"
Can anybody advise please ?
Thanks,

Use T. code SM30 and give table name J_1IT030K_V and click on maintain button give your chart of account, press enter here assign appropriate G/L A/C against Tax code MK.

FF747 Tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

We have sample orders where the order amount is calculated and then discounted fully. However, our freight goes to our tax software separately due to different taxability rules. Therefore, the original tax amount (pre-discount) is sent and we end up with FF 747: The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
The business wants to track this freight amount. How do we change the message from error to warning or does anyone have a work around so we can invoice these customers?
Thanks,
Michelle

Hello ,
I am facing the same issue. Could you please let me know how you resolved it ?
Thanks.

Tax rate is not coming up in PO

Hi,
The rate is not coming for one of the tax condition type in the PO
1)Tax percentage 12 percent is maintained against the condition type in FV11.
2)Calculation schema is proper.
3) Tax code is maintained properly .
this problem has arised after migrating to ECC6.0.Earlier version was 4.7
the base amount in PO is also zero condition type BASB in the tax calc procedure

Is the material taxable? Check material master
Also check the invoice tab of the PO to verify if tax code is getting populated and what jurisdiction codes. Then check ftxp for tax rates maintained for that combination or not.
Edited by: SB on Sep 17, 2008 10:46 PM

Witholding tax amount is not coming correct in FBL1N report.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for