Without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order

Our clients need is that without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order.
We are using CORK,cor6 and MB31 My need is to apply user exit in all cases.
I got input from sdn User exit:-PPCO0006 Function module Exit_SAPLCOZF_003
INCLUDE ZXCO1U06
I need to activate this only during confirmation.ie confirmation to be avoided if cost is not released.
Regards,
Pert

Hi,
You are right. For preventing confirmation in case std cost estimate release is not available you need to do enhancement. You can check for following exit along with exit which you mentioned in your post :
Enhancement     CONFPI05
EXIT_SAPLCORF_405 - Process Ord. Conf.: Cust.-Specific Enhancements when Saving
INCLUDE ZXCOFU10
Check either of the enhancements which may fulfill your business requirement.
Regards,
Tejas

Similar Messages

  • QA32 Without results recording system should not allow UD

    Dear All,
    Here we have only incoming inspection. For that i have activate 01 insp type in material master and respective master data also maintained. My problem is Once GRN has done its has gone to QA32. From there first i am doing results recording and save it. After that i was not able to do UD. Then i have gone to INspection lot change the user stantus to INIT then only system will allow me to do UD.
    Any automatic setting is there to be achieve this one. Whenever i wil do results recording no need to chagne the profile status or anything then i will do UD.
    Could you pls help me to resolve this issue.

    If you used the standard SAP process described here:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20fbc091-ea3a-2b10-f0a3-877ffbf36436?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    You shouldn't have to do anything except make sure all the required characteristics have a status of 5.
    You shouldn't have to manually mark the inspection lot complete.
    FF

  • Packing should not allow in OBD unless TOs are confirmed .....

    Hello,
    Our client need following requirement.
    Packing should not allow in outbound delivery unless transfer order is/are fully confirmed.
    In other word, during the packing, system should display an error if items in OBD are not fully picked and transfer order confirmation is pending for the items
    Is there any configuration to achieve this?
    If we need to use user exit then could you please name it.
    Thanks
    Milind

    Hi,
    I dont think there is any standard configuration for this.
    What i suggest you can try is to create a Routine in config VPBD (Define Requirements for Packing in Delivery).
    Here you can put a condition for your shipping point / Delivery type..that only if the Picked status is complete you can do the packing. Please try and let me know.
    Regards
    Sandeepan

  • The shipment should not allow to save without partner forwarrding agent.

    The CR (forwarding agent) partner is set as Mandatory in the configuration for partner procedure TR, but you can save a shipment without this partner function.  We are only using Shipment type Z003 and the TR procedure is assigned, and the CR partner is set as mandatory but the system is not requiring it.  Why isn't the Mandatory flag working in create mode?  If there is a CR on a shipment already, it will not let you delete it, but it will let you create a shipment and save without the CR partner.  See Shipmentxxx in DX1, it was created and saved without any partners on the partner tab.
    The shipment should not allow to save without partner forwarrding agent.

    Hi,
    Check config for 'Set Up Partner Determination for Shipments'.
    I believe the Partner function for Forwarding agent is FA and here you are talking about CR.
    Also make sure you Partner determination procedure is reflecting in your Shipment type.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • QA32: Without going in Inspection lot stock screen system should not allow for UD

    Hi
    At the time of UD "without going in Inspection lot stock screen system should not allow to save the UD".
    Please suggest how to restrict.
    Regards
    Ashish

    Please go through the below link & with small changes you can fulfill  your requirement using user profile
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/601c82e3-b743-2c10-dbb6-ed4c00167157?QuickLink=index&…

  • Without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decesion

    Hi
    without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decision.I think it is possible through user status. Please tell the procedure .
    Thanks and regards,
    vairavan

    Dear vairavan,
    You can check for the authorisation object.I can't remember that authoriation object right now.But surely you can restrict that with authorisation object.
    Anyone knows the authoristaion object.
    Regards,
    Sunil Patil

  • PO data should not allow to change

    Dear Forums,
    Can any body so kind to find a way in solve the following business requirement:
    In my client business scenario the PR only subjected to release. PO against the PR not go for any release.
    My client require the user should not allow to change the data of PO which is pick from PR (PO created reference to PR).
    For example : user should not allow to change the quantity in the PO which capture from PR while creating the PO reference to PR.
    Your early reply should highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    sp sahu

    Hi,
    there is no standard way of doing this and I am not sure that it should be done.
    How are you going to be able to correct errors and set deletion flags, delivery completerd flags etc. if the PO is blocked for change?
    If you really want to do this then  I would create a new document type that has the requisition reference field set to mandatory. This means that the document tyoe can ONLY be used for creating POs that refer to requisitions. Then change the field settings for this new PO document to display only in ME22n.
    That way, POs that don't reference a requisition will use another PO document type that has the fields set to open for input in ME22n.
    Would this do what you need to do?
    You should also look at the EVO and EFB parameters and config (in the Purcashing config menu under environment data > Default values for buyers (the EVO paraneters are maintained here)  The EFB parameter (the more powerful settings) is configured in the purchasing > Authorisation Management > Define function authorisations for buyers)
    Read the configuration text help and note the flags and what they do.
    Steve B

  • If there is no accounting document; SAP should not allow users to print

    Dear Gurus,
    Is there a standard way that,
    --if there is no accounting document; SAP should not allow users to print invoice?
    How can I do it?
    Regards,

    You can either use Tcode NACE for output procedure pr follow following path in SPRO:
    IMG - SD - Basic Functions - Output control - Output Determination - Maintain Output Determination for Billing Documents - Maintain Output Determination Procedure
    There for your output procedure used for the desired output type maintain requirement routine as 62 : Billing doc released to acctng.
    This requirement is met if the billing document is complete checking the header, pricing, and all items and has already been passed to financial accounting. The requirement also checks that the document is not relevant for an invoice list. This requirement can be assigned to billing document output condition types that should only be processed when the billing document is complete and forwarded to accounting. This requirement can only be used with billing documents.
    Regards
    JP

  • WITHOUT STO RELEASE,SYSTEM WILLN'T ALLOW MATERIAL ISSUE WITH STO,IN SUP.PLA

    Hai Expert,
    I have one issue. please let me share..
    I have created one STO. Then i am going for issue in suppling plant with reference to STO, With out sto release also system is accepting to release...
    System should not allow to issue.. before STO RELEASE
    PLEASE GUIDE ME HOW TO CONTROL

    Sub-Contracting PO is subjected to release strategy..
    Without Sub-Contracting PO release, system is accepting to issue material to subcontract vendor...
    where as GRN is not accepting with reference to  this po...
    system has stop material issue also..
    to control this.. what i have to do ??

  • Should not allow TECO

    Respected PP Gurus,
    My client requirement is like this...
    They are creating one planned order for a month and then partially converting into process order as required, also further this process order is confirmed partially, so one order they confirm twice or thrice........., now in the month end user do TECO for all the orders, in that case orders which are having status PCNF and/or PDLV also get status TECO.
    Requirement is sytem should not allow TECO if any one of the above two is active.
    Please Guide
    Thanks in advance
    Kailash T.

    Dear Kailash,
    When system heaving PCNF/PDLV system allow to do TECO,there is no standard functionality to restrict,we also faced same problem,we followed created program for that and assigned user exit,now system is working fine.
    Hope this may helps you
    Prem.

  • With out goods issue for order system should not allow for order confirmati

    Dear all
    with out goods issue system should not allow for order/operation confirmation.
    how it is possible.
    Regrads
    Srinivas

    Dear ,
    In some cases we required to do confirmation or TECO without GI .
    We can change it as per req using user exit
    Regards,
    Ishwar

  • Final GR should not allow if COGI exist.

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    SAP should allow COGI for all the phases , But at the time of conforming Final Phase if COGI exist in previous phase then system should not allow final phase conformation. i.e. Final GR  (Movement type  101) should not allow.
    What is the configuration required to make it possible
    Best Regards,
    Parag Save.

    Parag,
    There is no Standard Setting or Functionality available to perform this, how ever you can look at using the Confirmation related user exit, in the user exit you need to put your code to check AFWW table for the order,if records are found, give an error message and terminate Confirmation.
    Hope this helps...
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • System should not allow to delete PO line Item after GR/IR

    Hi,
    I am working on a SAP Retail Implementation project.
    Currently the system is allowing us to delete the PO line items after doing GR or IR against that PO line item. But the clients requirement is that the system should not allow to delete PO line item after doing GR/IR.
    We are using Account Assignment Category-N, Item Category-S.
    Please let me know if you have the solution for this requirement.
    Thanks in advance
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suresh

    Hi,
    Standard SAP will not allowed the PO to be deleted once it was GR done. The controlled is on the attributes of message to set as "E"
    Message no. 06115
    But if invoiced takes place, the is the point that PO can be deleted.
    You have to do have a Enhancement using MM06E005, insert you logic here to check PO history tables like EKBE, then check if invoice " Q" (BEWTP) exist, the PO cannot be deleted once the user delete the PO line and SAVE it. Ask you developer to help you on the following coding.
    Use MM06E005 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
    IF SY-TCODE = 'ME22N'.
    IF sy-ucomm = 'MESAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'YES'..
    LOOP AT TEKPO.
    IF TEKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
    SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR1 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'E'.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR2 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'Q'.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    Regards,

  • Restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO

    Hi
    how to restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
    if the material Excisable user can bale to select the No Excise entry tab in MIGO . my requirement .... if the Pop come Please enter Excise Invoice number and Excise Invoice Date user should not change the No Excise how to restrict pls advise me
    @sakhi

    These are the options provided by SAP keeping in mind Indian Scenario. Sometimes, vendor forget to send excise invoice copy with the material, in such case, you can select 'Only Part I'.
    Even if you have maintain vendor excise details & material excise details (By mistake) in J1ID, system will throw an error message, excise invoice value is zero. In such case, we can select option 'No excise entry'.
    Your requirement can't be fulfilled in standard way. Even if you go for any Z- developement, you will lose the option.

  • Invoice cancellation should not allow for closed periods

    Dear All,
    We will be closing the posting period for each quarter,and declare the sales figure.,what ever the invoices we have made should not be cancelled in that quarter.,i want the a check in the system that if any cancellation during this quarter which is closed ,should not allow to cancel the invoice.ofcourse the accounting document will not be generated as the posting period is closed but still the invoice is generated and blocked for accounting.i want the creation of billing document should be blocked.
    i Know this can be achieved By defining new routine in VOFA and assign it in VTFL., but is there any standerd routine there which will solve my purpose or i hae to go for new routine.
    REgards
    Shakthi

    Hello Shakthi,
    In standard, there is note 180756.
    Unfortunately the note 180756 just helps for billing creation, it is not useful for
    billing cancellation.
    The note 180756 suggests to develop a copy requirement routine checking
    the periods.
    But in VF11 copy requirement routine are not performed.
    Unfortunately there is not a ready-to-use workaround.
    In transaction VOFA is possible to define a "copy requirement" routine,
    which is performed when the invoice is cancelled.
    You could create a routine doing the necessary check, and put
    it here.
    Regards,
    Alex

Maybe you are looking for