WITHOUT STO RELEASE,SYSTEM WILLN'T ALLOW MATERIAL ISSUE WITH STO,IN SUP.PLA

Hai Expert,
I have one issue. please let me share..
I have created one STO. Then i am going for issue in suppling plant with reference to STO, With out sto release also system is accepting to release...
System should not allow to issue.. before STO RELEASE
PLEASE GUIDE ME HOW TO CONTROL

Sub-Contracting PO is subjected to release strategy..
Without Sub-Contracting PO release, system is accepting to issue material to subcontract vendor...
where as GRN is not accepting with reference to  this po...
system has stop material issue also..
to control this.. what i have to do ??

Similar Messages

  • Without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order

    Our clients need is that without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order.
    We are using CORK,cor6 and MB31 My need is to apply user exit in all cases.
    I got input from sdn User exit:-PPCO0006 Function module Exit_SAPLCOZF_003
    INCLUDE ZXCO1U06
    I need to activate this only during confirmation.ie confirmation to be avoided if cost is not released.
    Regards,
    Pert

    Hi,
    You are right. For preventing confirmation in case std cost estimate release is not available you need to do enhancement. You can check for following exit along with exit which you mentioned in your post :
    Enhancement     CONFPI05
    EXIT_SAPLCORF_405 - Process Ord. Conf.: Cust.-Specific Enhancements when Saving
    INCLUDE ZXCOFU10
    Check either of the enhancements which may fulfill your business requirement.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Issue with STO over delivery

    I am sure this topic has been taken up so many times before. I have browsed through almost all of them. I still do not have a way of restricting STO over delivery! Require your expertise!!.
    My requirement is that STO over deliver should not occur when using VL10* transactions alone.
    We tried to export a flag (say delv_flag)from program 'RVV50R10C'  to shared buffer and import the same into BADI LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC (DELIVERY_FINAL_CHECK) to capture error message when STO over delivery is created. The entire logic is built based on this flag alone.We are deleting the flag in V50R_MAIN of the program 'RVV50R10C'.
    There are some issues with this method:
    1. In some cases the delete flag statement gets executed before importing from memory and hence an STO over delivery gets created. (I don't know how or why!).
    2. When VL10* transaction is executed, the delivery flag is set. At this point in time, if the user tries to delete delivery without exiting the transaction, the BADI will get triggered and error message will be displayed. This is not correct functionality since error message should be displayed only for VL10* transactions.
    Suggestion:
    If I change the location of exporting the flag to include 'LV50R_VIEWF43' (form delivery_create), do you suppose it would work? Would Idocs trigger this?
    If anybody has worked on similar requirement please share your inputs. Urgent!!!!
    PS:
    I have read about delivery tolerances too "The overdelivery tolerance functionality is available only for the deliveries created with reference to sales orders and not for deliveries created with reference for PO's or STO's".

    Dear Sapna Morey
    I think OMCQ T.Code-- Select message M7--024 Change from Waring to error
    Please try once with this it may work To control over delivery tolarency in STO
    Dear  Lakshmipathi G sir
    i have one doubt please clear me sir please
    To control Over delivery tolarance in sap standard  is not available , then what is the use of the above one.
    Because i have searched a lot , i didnt find the logic about this
    Thanks a lot sir please help me sir
    Thanks

  • Subcontracting child material issue with SO ref

    Hi all,
    As per the client business scenario we are using MTO for all production/purchase process, In between the production process the material also going to subcontract for some process and coming back as new material. As i mentioned earlier all material movement with ref to sale order only.
    So, the child material in SO stock, created the subcontract PO through MRP by using Item cat - L and Account Assignment - M, with child material, system is recoganising the subcontract consumption with ref to SO in 543 mvt type. but while sending the material from plant through 541 system is not able to recoganise (since there is no special stock assigned in value string OMJJ).
    How to make the Sale order reference as manditory while GI (541/542) and GR (101/102/543/544/545/546) of subcontracting.
    Request your valuable suggestions
    Regards
    Sridharan

    Hi,
    Please refer below link...
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a04ec1a0-c39b-2c10-6889-f6f69625f3f3?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    Kuber

  • QA32 Without results recording system should not allow UD

    Dear All,
    Here we have only incoming inspection. For that i have activate 01 insp type in material master and respective master data also maintained. My problem is Once GRN has done its has gone to QA32. From there first i am doing results recording and save it. After that i was not able to do UD. Then i have gone to INspection lot change the user stantus to INIT then only system will allow me to do UD.
    Any automatic setting is there to be achieve this one. Whenever i wil do results recording no need to chagne the profile status or anything then i will do UD.
    Could you pls help me to resolve this issue.

    If you used the standard SAP process described here:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20fbc091-ea3a-2b10-f0a3-877ffbf36436?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    You shouldn't have to do anything except make sure all the required characteristics have a status of 5.
    You shouldn't have to manually mark the inspection lot complete.
    FF

  • Not to allow material movements with qty in decimals

    Hi All,
    A material X is having the Basic UoM as PC(piece) and alternate Uoms as kg & EA .
    conversion factor is : 1 PC=1EA  &  1PC=1 kg
    I want to restrict the system from allowing the Goods Receipt / Goods Issue in decimals. eg: 0.6 PC
    Also, in production order if possible.

    Hi
    In Tcode CUNI, ensure no decimal places are maintained for all the PC, KG and EA
    Regards,
    Raman

  • Valuation Type Issue with STOs

    Hello Folks !!
    In the client environment Materials are going to be Batch Managed as well as Split Valuated (by Country of Origin "H" Category).
    When we create STOs, Valuation Type of the receiving plant is mandatory and it has to be specified up in the STO Order itself. [ According to SAP OSS Note: 66593]
    The problem here is the Planner who is creating the STO is not going to know the Valuation Type of the Receiving Plant at the time of creating the STO.
    The valuation type of the product will be known only at the time of Shipping. That is, upon delivery creation the Batches will be determined and the Shipping Valuation Type will be known.
    Also Note that : If we pick any default valuation type at the time of the STO creation, that is going to create problems at the time of receiving at the receiving plant, because if a different valuation type is shipped than the one mentioned in the STO Order, the system is going to say, that the Batch Valuation Type and the Valuation Type Specified in teh STO are different.
    What do you Experts Suggest !! How could this be resolved ??
    Cheers

    dear experts
    we had faced similar issue and done enhancement to substitute Val Type of PDI to PO before GR.
    But this has resulted in inconsistency in ML & MCHA.
    The Financial & ML entry is posted at the time of PGI (641 mov type) and subsequent change on GR is not correct.
    Now we have reverted the enhancement and finding alternative solution.
    Some body suggested Automatic PO based on PGI.
    regards
    Hardy

  • Parental Controls Always Allow App issue with Blender app (3d modeling app)

    To whom this may concern,
    I have a 3D modeling app called blender. I have installed it on my mac os running on lion (os 10.7) currently.
    What I want to do. Always run this app on an account that has parental controls set up on my mac. The blender app would be a part of the allowed apps for the account.
    Here's where I have my problem:
    I have set it up to run on an account that has parental controls set up.
    The problem I keep running in to is that every time I try to run blender I receive a popup window that says the app is not allowed and gives me three options: always allow, allow once, or okay (and close without trying to open).
    Everytime I try to click always allow and enter my password, the process just repeats the next time I open the app. This make me believe that perhaps there is some sort of executable that the blender app uses before starting that the parental controls is stopping and even when I allow blender to start, there is something else not being allowed through. Any ideas on how I can work around this (obviously I want to keep parental controls on to prevent access to other apps)?
    I'm not overly computer savvy but I can give some more info as requested if my question needs further explanation/documentation
    I guess the best way to see the problem for yourself is to download blender and try using it on an account with parental controls, heh heh.
    This is more of an annoyance having to enter the passcode everytime I want to use this wonderful app.
    Thanks for any help.

    Solution:
    I updated to OSX Mavericks and the parental controls issue went away for Blender.
    Hurray!

  • TS3367 Since updating to the new operating system I have had some issues with FaceTime.  When calling my Dad through FaceTime I have gotten someone else using my Dad's email.  This has happened on at least 4 occasions.  Has anybody else had this problem?

    Has anyone had an issue contacting someone through FaceTime?  Sometimes when I try to call my Dad I get a different party ( someone I don' t know).  This has happened when calling fro IPad (3) And IPhone 5s.

    In the terminal I go to /volumes/some_folder/test and I type "chmod 4711 test" so that the C++ program will be run as the admin account I'm logged in with. This admin account has privileges to create folders in /volumes/some_folder/test.
    I vaguely recall something about this - isn't it related to the execution of setuid scripts?
    There's a whole discussion on the security implications of doing this. It's generally not considered safe.
    It might be worth reading http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/suexec.html for details of how to implement setuid within Apache.

  • Material Issued from other Plants

    Hi All,
    I have 2 question here.
    I have created a STPO with delivery date say 12.09.2009 from my plant ABC to the Plant XYZ and 140 qty, For this XYZ plant has issued material on 15.09.2009 around 100 qty.,
    Now I am looking for the report ME2W to find out what are all the materials has supplied by other plant till 14.09.2009.
    but as per the report ME2W it is having I/P option as delivery date, so if i put delivery date between 01.09.2009 to 14.09.2009, it is showing  all the material which is issued on after 14.09.2009 also as i have put the delivery date and also it is checking as per delivery date.
    Question:
    1. How to get these reports ie., materials issued as per issued date or posting date not as per delivery date or not as per material code---- any transaction available for this.
    2. one more i come across here in STPO is that, if i create 100 qty of PO but it is allowing to issue more than the PO qty, say if i create Po with 100 Qty but other plant can issue more than 100 ie.,>100.
    Is thr any settings available to make such the system should not allow to issue more than the PO qty.
    Please help me out on this.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S
    Edited by: Nagaraj  S on Oct 1, 2009 2:52 PM

    Dear Vidya Dewangan ,
    I have checked MB5B, it is not for the requirment what i want.
    See this report or MB51 would works with only 2 plants where within which these ST can occur.What in my scenario we have more than 2 plants, See i will clearly expalin the situatin -
    Thr are 3 plants-  Plant A,Plant B, Plant C.
    ST happens b/w A and B, A & C, B& C and Visa versa.
    Now I want to know what are all the ST happens between Plant A and Plant B, where Plant A has supplied some material  to plant B on some day(ie., 351 on posting day),say i dont know material i know only the dates.I cant use MB51, is thr any other report i can get.
    Pls help me out.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S

  • Returning material issue

    Hi,
    I have configured standar process for material issues with services rule also, but I need to know the standar process
    in order to returning material (issue by mistake for example).
    There is an indicator in report NMCOL where it suppose used to bring canceled consumptions, but where do we
    cancel consumptions? (standar only please).
    Best regards.

    Hello Milasanz,
    To be able to reverse/cancel a material consumption in IS-H, an appropriate good issue must be reversed/canceled. To cancel a good issue you must use, for example, the following MM t-code: MBST - Cancel/Reverse. It is the logic, BUT actually once you cancel a good issue, a system still issues an error message when you try to cancel a material consumption (it is wrong behavior of SAP). We've written to SAP about the mistake.
    To cancel a material consumption, you must use t-code NMMC1.
    Regards,
    Alexander.

  • SAP allows release of Standard Cost for Material with Moving Average Price

    Hi
    We set our Raw Material to use Moving Average Price (V) and price determination 2 (single level). And we activated material ledger.
    During mass calculation of standard cost (CK40N), If user accidentally forgot to restrict the Raw Material for being included in calculation, the system calculate standard cost anyway, even though I set it as Moving Average Price. And user is able to release it too without any problem.
    Why the system does not restrict it? By giving error maybe. Although as for now I can not find the wrong effect from releasing standard cost for MAP material, by your experience, is there any side effect that I should be aware of?
    Thanks

    CK40n is mass release of all materials. The release is not dependent on price indicator of the material in the master. It will calculate standard cost of all the materials.
    Releasing standard cost estimate of raw materials does not have any side effect as long your calculation is based on moving average price.
    Regards
    Divraj

  • QA32: Without going in Inspection lot stock screen system should not allow for UD

    Hi
    At the time of UD "without going in Inspection lot stock screen system should not allow to save the UD".
    Please suggest how to restrict.
    Regards
    Ashish

    Please go through the below link & with small changes you can fulfill  your requirement using user profile
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/601c82e3-b743-2c10-dbb6-ed4c00167157?QuickLink=index&…

  • Without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decesion

    Hi
    without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decision.I think it is possible through user status. Please tell the procedure .
    Thanks and regards,
    vairavan

    Dear vairavan,
    You can check for the authorisation object.I can't remember that authoriation object right now.But surely you can restrict that with authorisation object.
    Anyone knows the authoristaion object.
    Regards,
    Sunil Patil

  • Old operating systems allowed you to click on recipients when sending emails without adding a comma after each address. Now with the new and improved system, I have to stop and add a comma after each name. How can I avoid this?

    With the new OSX system, whenever I send an email with multiple recipients, I need to physically add a comma after each address. I never needed to do that with all the other older systems, it was done automatically. How can I fix this frustrating glitch?

    option discovered in preferences. Really this and any feature that moves deletes or edits a users data should as far as possible be OFF BY DEFAULT. It shouldn't by default and without the users specific say do this dangerous and unnecessary thing without even letting the user know what it's doing!!! And then cause me a few hours (as i'm new to mac) searching for the option so as to switch it off. If i hadn't noticed the status cage declaring that it was copying files then i might never have twigged that this insane thing was occurring. And if i hadn't of noticed i would have been left maintaining the contents of the folder i copied the files to, the folder which as far as i was informed and so believed was also the location of the music files i was playing. How does Apple justify this 'genius' piece of software non-design? Surely it will hurt no one if this was off by default for new users - overall at least i dare say it would cause a lot less distress in the future for the unsuspecting public at large. Thanks for the support.

Maybe you are looking for