WLC 5508 and LightWeight APs Deployment question

Hi There,
Can you please wit the following question in regards to the deployment of a new WLC and new LAPs,
I have configured and connected a 5508 WLC and 3500 series LAP.
LAG is enabled in the WLC and successfully connected to the neighboring switch (using etherchannel) and to the network.
The port-channel port is set to trunk mode obviously and certain vlan ids are currently allowed (3-5)
The management interface has this IP address 192.168.5.250/24
I created a WLAN with WLAN ID 3, Interface set to Management and say SSID test1
I have connected a new LAP to the network, which switchport interface is set to access mode and assigned with vlan id 3. The LAP is able to join the WLC successfully with an IP address, such as, 192.168.3.100 (assigned via DHCP).
When I try connecting a mobile client to the wireless LAN, it can successfully detect and connect to the WLAN, created in the WLC (test1) however it gets an IP address by DHCP, in the 192.168.5.0/24 network, which is the IP range of the management interface's IP address.
What can I do to get the clients connecting on network 192.168.3.0/24? I thought this would be the case since I allocated the WLAN Id of 3 in the WLAN test1 configuration and since the LAP switchport is set to access mode with vlan ID 3.
Cheers,
egua5261

Hi,
The WLAN ID has no effect with the VLAN ID. WLAN ID is just an identifier for the WLAN.
you said "Interface set to Management and say SSID test1" and here is your issue.
You set the interface of the WLAN to the management. So, the WLAN will be mapped to the VLAN to which the management interface is mapped to.
What you need to do is to create a dynamic interface with ip range in 192.168.3.0/24 and provide VLAN ID for that interface and assign your WLAN to this new interface. This way your clients will get an IP from this specified range.
HTH
Amjad

Similar Messages

  • WLC 5508 and 1142 APs

    Hi ! How can I view the WPA passwords that was set on my APs ? I have web access to the WLC. Thanks.

    You can use a program called wz Cook on windows boxes to pull the wep and wpa keys ..
    "Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin
    ‎"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."

  • WLC 5508 and associated AP's

    Hi,
    I have a problem with a poor signal. I have two WLC 5508 and 10 ap's 3502. So, that I have two wlc on the network I decided to divide this 10 ap's.
    WLC 5508 has 7.0.98 software version.
    The 5 first ap was associated to one wlc and the other 5 to second controller.
    Two problems was observed, first that some clients which try connect to AP associated  to second controller have problem to obtain IP address from DHCP pool on first wlc.
    The second problem is that on this two WLC was configured two DHCP pool. One controller assigns address for a dedicated WLAN and the second wlc assigns address for a second WLAN.
    This two WLAN's is broadcast on two wlc.
    Kamil

    Hi Nicolas,
    The APs are 3502I model and now are located on the lower ceiling.
    From Thursday all APs are associated to only one WLC the second one is just only as a backup and from this time there are not any problems with a signal. This information is directly from clients.
    The DHCP pool is located on the first WLC now.
    Also, I considered to use switch or other machine as a DHCP pool but it's problematic to deploy now.
    Kamil

  • Wlc 5508 and 40 access point 1141n disturbance in the temp response

    Hello,
    i have a wlc 5508 and 40 access point 1141n
    there are 1500 users connected with this controller 5508.
    but when i ping at my gateway  ,there is a disturbance in the temp response .
    Here below a snapshot:
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=1 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=5 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=2 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=56 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=105 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=433 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=1 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=100 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=300 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=466 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=711 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=900 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=55 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=52 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=54 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=200 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=57 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1: octets=32 temps=800 ms TTL=55
    anyone help me?
    thx

    Looks to be wither a duplicate address issue or a configuration issue.  Try to test with only using the 2.4ghz and then again with only the 5ghz and see if you see a difference.
    Thanks,
    Scott
    Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"

  • WLC 5508 AND AP 1141N disturbance in the temp response

    i have a wlc 5508 and 40 access point 1141n
    there are 1500 users connected with this controller 5508.
    but when i ping at my gateway  ,there is a disturbance in the temp response .
    Here below a snapshot:
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=1 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=5 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=2 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=56 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=105 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=433 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=1 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=100 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=300 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=466 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=711 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=900 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=55 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=52 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=54 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=200 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1 : octets=32 temps=57 ms TTL=55
    Réponse de 172.16.1.1: octets=32 temps=800 ms TTL=55
    anyone help me
    THX

    Looks to be wither a duplicate address issue or a configuration issue.  Try to test with only using the 2.4ghz and then again with only the 5ghz and see if you see a difference.
    Thanks,
    Scott
    Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"

  • WLC 5508 and LAP1310 - Not syncing up!

    As the title states I have a WLC 5508 and a LAP1310 that will not sync up.
    The error stated in the traps log is "AP with MAC (xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx) is unknown."
    WLC software release is : 7.2.103.0
    IOS on the AP is : 12.4(18a)JA2
    Upon some investigation I found that the "AP with MAC is unknown" error usually points to one of two things:
    A.  WLC firmware needs to be updated
    B.  AP needs to be updated.
    C. The AP is not compatible with the WLC.
    I am leaning toward solution C and I am looking for a conformation or a correction, if anyone could help out that would be greatly appreciated!
    I've tried reading the compatibility matrix released by Cisco, but I found it mildly confusing as to what is and isn't supported by each software release.
    Sources - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_tech_note09186a00808f8599.shtml#lap1250
    Problem 11: 1250 LAP Not Able to Join WLC
    The setup consists of a 2106 WLC that runs version 4.1.185.0. A Cisco 1250 AP is not able to join the controller.
    The log on the WLC shows this:
    Mon Jun 2 21:19:37 2008 AP with MAC f0:2x:cf:2x:1d:3x (APf02x.cf2x.1d3x) is unknown.
    Mon Jun 2 21:19:37 2008 AP Associated. Base Radio MAC: f0:2x:cf:2x:1d:3x 
    Mon Jun 2 21:19:26 2008 AP Disassociated. Base Radio MAC:f0:2x:cf:2x:1d:3x
    Mon Jun 2 21:19:20 2008 AP with MAC f0:2x:cf:2x:1d:3x (APf02x.cf2x.1d3x) is unknown.
    Mon Jun 2 21:19:20 2008 AP Associated. Base Radio MAC: f0:2x:cf:2x:1d:3x 
    Mon Jun 2 21:19:09 2008 AP Disassociated. Base Radio MAC:f0:2x:cf:2x:1d:3x
    Mon Jun 2 21:19:03 2008 AP with MAC f0:2x:cf:2x:1d:3x (APf02x.cf2x.1d3x) is unknown.
    Solution: This is because the Cisco 1250 series LAP is not supported on version 4.1. The Cisco Aironet 1250 Series AP is supported from controller versions 4.2.61 and later. In order to fix this issue, upgrade the controller software to 4.2.61.0 or later.
    Problem 16: 1000 series LAPs not able to join the Wireless LAN controller, WLC runs version 5.0
    This is because WLC software release 5.0.148.0 or later is not compatible with Cisco Aironet 1000 series APs. If you have a Cisco 1000 series LAP in a network, which runs WLC versions 5.0.48.0, the 1000 series LAP does not join the controller and you see this trap message on the WLC.
    "AP with MAC xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx is unkown"

    videoaudiojack
    What version of Premiere Elements are you using and on what computer operating system is it running?
    What are the properties of this .mp4 video import (video and audio compressions, frame size, frame rate, interlaced or progressive, pixel aspect ratio)?
    If you have any information about the video bitrate and audio bitrate of the file, that would be good to know.
    What is the audio - stereo 2 channel or 5.1 channel?
    What are you (manually) or the project automatically setting as the project preset to match the properties of your source video?
    Let us start here and then decide what next.
    Thank you.
    ATR

  • An issue with WLC 5508 and 7921 phone

    Hello all!
    I have a system with WLC 5508 and some 1242 APs. And I use a lot of 7921 phones.
    One of 7921 phones was in trouble. It loses registration, disconnect conversations...
    I installed the trial WLC and run voice diagnostics.
    I  saw some of "Potentially degraded QoS in downlink direction because of  incorrect packet classification" messages and one "Fair upstream packet  loss ratio: 1,2%, which is less than threshold 2.5%"
    As I understand all of 7921 phones in these area are affected.
    what  does it mean? I set up Platinum QoS for voice WLAN. I don't have any qos  configuration string for AP and WLC ports on switches...
    any ideas?
    thanx in advance

    Sergey:
    There is one application called "WLC Config analyzer". You save your "show run-config" from your WLC in a text file and import it by this application. it will analyze the file for you and tell you what recommendations for voice are missing so you improve them.
    When importing a config file you choose what voice clinets you are using, so you need to choose cisco 7921 to it tells you what config improvemetns is needed based on 7921 needs.
    Here is the link to download the application:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1373
    download the latest versoin.
    BTW, how many voice/data clients are connected to one AP in that area? if I remember correctly if you are utilizing voice then the max number of clients connected to one AP should not exceed 17. If you have more than this number per AP try to minimize the number of users concurrently connected to the AP then try again.
    Hope you'll find the config analyzer useful.
    If useful please don't forget to rate.
    Amjad

  • What is the spec of WLC 5508 and 4402, CPU and MEM? Thanks.

    I cant found any information about WLC 5508 and 4402s' spec of what type of CPU and size of MEM. Thanks.

    4402 is having 512MB memory where as 5508 is having 1GB (based on "show memory statistics" output)
    Also during bootup it will show (here is 4402 as example)
    System will now restart!
    Bootloader 7.0.116.0 (Apr 13 2011 - 14:30:45)
    Motorola PowerPC ProcessorID=00000000 Rev. PVR=80200020
    CPU: 833 MHz
    CCB: 333 MHz
    DDR: 166 MHz
    LBC: 41 MHz
    L1 D-cache 32KB, L1 I-cache 32KB enabled.
    I2C: ready
    DTT: 1 is 33 C
    DRAM: DDR module detected, total size:512MB.
    512 MB
    8540 in PCI Host Mode.
    8540 is the PCI Arbiter.
    Memory Test PASS
    FLASH:
    Flash Bank 0: portsize = 2, size = 8 MB in 142 Sectors
    8 MB
    L2 cache enabled: 256KB
    Card Id: 1540
    Card Revision Id: 1
    Card CPU Id: 1287
    Number of MAC Addresses: 32
    Number of Slots Supported: 4
    Serial Number: FOC1229F08U
    Unknown command Id: 0xa5
    Unknown command Id: 0xa4
    Unknown command Id: 0xa3
    Manufacturers ID: 30464
    Board Maintenance Level: 00
    Number of supported APs: 12
    In: serial
    Out: serial
    Err: serial
    HTH
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • WLC 5508 and remote site (DMVPN) Access Points

    Hi All,
    We just purchased a WLC 5508 and would like to know if it will control remote VPN site Access Points.  Here are the details:
    The 5508 will live at our home office.  We have multiple remote sites that are connected via Cisco's DMVPN.  Each site has one Cisco 1131 Access Point hanging off of either a Cisco 1841 or a 2811 that is using DMVPN back to the home office 2811.  Can the 5508 manage the remote Access Points?
    Thanks for your help guys!

    Are you are talking about OfficeExtend?
    Cisco OfficeExtend
    https://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns430/solution_overview_c22-523307_ns348_Networking_Solution_Solution_Overview.html
    OfficeExtend supports 1130 & 1140 as long as you have the Wireless PLUS (WPLUS) Software.
    OfficeExtend Access Point
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/wcs/6.0/configuration/guide/6_0apcfg.html#wp1069890

  • WLC 5508 And Third Party SSL for Web Authenticaiton

    Hello,
    We are using WLC 5508 and currently the authentication process is via Customized WebAuth. As you know that with the WebAuth the authentication process won't work unless you launch Web Browser and you will be redirected to the Authentication Page where you type your username and password. This is a bit fuzzy for most of the users and what I'm thinking is to use different authentication mechanism where the user will automatically be prompted upon connecting to any SSID. I have read that Public/Thrid Party certificate will do this and any client can accept the public certificate.
    Anyone can elaborate on this approach?
    Regards, 

    With machines that are not part of the domain, typicall if you still want to secure them usin 802.1x, you would leverage a radius server and users would be told of the SSID to connect to and enter their AD credentials.  Of course, if you use AD credentials, users will now join all their other devices to that SSID. This is where ISE comes in and you can profile devices. Even though the WLC with v7.6 can profile, it's not a full fledge profiler.  Depending on how well you know radius, you can leverage a portal page also and depending on the AD group a user is a member of, you can out them is a specific Vlan or if you leverage interface groups.  You can do many things, but you need to really know radius and client types to figure out what can and work well in your environment. Radius alone to someone who hasn't played with it, can take days to setup without help. 
    Every client I setup radius for is different and it comes down to how their users are setup in AD, what devices they have and the requirements. 
    Scott

  • Port channel WLC 5508 and 3750

    Hi All,
    I want to configure Port channel for WLC 5508 and cisco 3750 Stack Switch. What changes I need to make on WLC and where?
    Thanks
    Jagdev

    Thanks Chris,
    LAG is enable on WLC, and Port channel is configured on 3750, Please see the configration and Port channel status below:-
    (Cisco Controller) >show lag summary
    LAG Enabled
    interface Port-channel14
    description Port Channel to WLC001
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport mode trunk
    end
    sh etherchannel 14 summary
    Flags:  D - down        P - bundled in port-channel
            I - stand-alone s - suspended
            H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
            R - Layer3      S - Layer2
            U - in use      f - failed to allocate aggregator
            M - not in use, minimum links not met
            u - unsuitable for bundling
            w - waiting to be aggregated
            d - default port
    Number of channel-groups in use: 14
    Number of aggregators:           14
    Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
    ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
    14     Po14(SD)        LACP      Gi1/0/22(I) Gi2/0/22(I)
    sh run int g1/0/22
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 209 bytes
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/22
    description Trunk to WLC001 DistPort1
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 254
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 14 mode active
    end
    sh run int g2/0/22
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 209 bytes
    interface GigabitEthernet2/0/22
    description Trunk to WLC001 DistPort2
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 254
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 14 mode active
    end

  • Integration between WLC 5508 and Microsoft NPS 2008

    Hi guys,
    Any of you, have working guidance for WLC 5508 and Microsoft NPS 2008 integration?
    I managed to configure Wireless 802.1x feature (PEAP) but it failed. I'm running software ver. 7.0.116.0.
    Is there any bug related 802.1x on this software version?
    thanks in advance.
    BR
    shendy

    Hi Shendy,
    I am not aware about any bug related to this. I think you better check all configuration and make sure it is fine.
    Logs from NPS and WLC (and possibly from the supplicant) may guide you where the problem resides.
    What does the NPS logs tell about the reason of the authentication failure?
    What does the WLC logs say about the failure (check show msglog and show traplog).
    - Make sure the Radius server added correctly with correct IP and correct shared secret on WLC.
    - Make sure that the radius is configured correctly to allow PEAP-MSCHAPv2.
    - Make sure WLC is added successfully to WLC with correct IP address and correct shared secret.
    - Make sure the clients are correctly configured and the server's (NPS) certificate is trusted on the clients.
    HTH
    Amjad

  • WLC 5508 and Autonomous AP 1240 upgrade to Lightweight

    Hi All,
    very simple question, for who knows it... :-)
    Does an autonomous Cisco AP 1240G/AG series upgraded to Lightweight register/associate to a WLC 5508 ??
    I found some documention, it seems not:
    These Cisco wireless LAN  controllers support autonomous access points upgraded to lightweight  mode:
    • 2000 series  controllers
    • 4400 series  controllers
    • Cisco Wireless Services  Modules (WiSMs) for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series  Switches
    • Controller Network Modules  within the Cisco 28/37/38xx Series Integrated Services  Routers
    • Catalyst 3750G Integrated  Wireless LAN Controller Switches
    The 5500 is not in the list...
    However based in some posts and other webpages, it looks that the 1240 converted to LAP can join a 5508...
    Somebody can help please??
    MANY THANKS!!!
    Alex Bertrán

    Yes, it can. Always check release notes for controller code, it lists supported access points:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn601820.html

  • Low Bandwith, WLC 5508 and LAP 1142N, please help !

    Hello Everyone
    For the Environment:
    - I have a WLC 5508 With a license up to 100 AP, at the Point there are 39 AP connected.
    - The WLC is connected with 8x 1Gbit/s, as a Trunk ==> 2 Members of 3750 Switches Stack ( 4gig and 4 gig)
    - The AP are connected to diferent 2960s with an Uplink ( 3 Gbit/s)  to the 3750 Switches
    - There are max. 12 AP on each 2960s
    - The AP are powered over Ethernet
    The AP:
    - it runs a/b/g/n and on 2,4 Ghz i schould have 300 mbit/s as for the 5 Ghz it schould also run 300mbit /s
    - the Ap has an uplink of 1 Gbit/s
    The clients:
    - have a intel Wifi link 5300 AGN Card
    To the Problem:
    - if i connect to one AP, and the Signal strength is High, i get an upload rate of max. 6-8Mbyte/s.
      and i am the only Person uploading.
      if i upload from 3 clients the same data from the same spot to the same target i get 2-3 Mbyte/s per client.
      if connect to the same target and run over ethernet cable fom the same spot, i get an upload of 70 -85 Mbyte/s.
    Question:
    - Why am i having these Bandwith problems ??

    Thanks Scott,
    I understand what you are mentioning, and i really didnt do it yet.
    I realize that the primary controller was not configured on the
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
    Wireless –> All APs –> High Availability tab, and did it only to the AP that is taking this beahviour.
    Is this mandatory for a 1 controller only ?
    No mather what the manual say, after that the AP is rebooting 2 mins in 2 mins... with the same kind of messages.
    The interface on the switch is getting a few input errors and the same numbers of crc... but are so few...
    Next step ... i will change it to another one's place/pathing cable.
    Regarding the Radius messages... any ideas ?
    I'm already on 30 sec's of server timeout.
    Best Regards,
    Bruno Petrónio

  • Anchor mobility between WLC 5508 and Aruba/Clearpass

    Hello. I have a question regarding the abiltiy to configure anchor mobility between a 5508 WLC and an Aruba controller. To date, my understanding is it has never been possible and I have never found any documentation that says it can be done.
    Scenario: My organization and a partner organization co-own a hospital. We coexist on a large campus, with each org having a number of buildings that the owning org maintains the network presence in. We also maintain back-to-back firewalls between us and do not hand-off any direct layer 2 interfaces to each other. However, the two orgs do partner to provide each others business SSID's in each other's WiFi networks using anchor mobility. Our current solution utilizes an A/M tunnel between my org's 5508 controllers and the partner orgs 2504 controller and we explicitly permit the tunnel traffic between partner controllers for A/M to work. Last year, the partner org retired some old WiSM's and changed their wireless solution to Aruba and recently implemented Clearpass. In order to maintain A/M with us they left a 4404 operational, but due to the newer code we were running they were forced to purchase a 2504. So now they are only maintaining a limited footprint in their network with a few Cisco AP's and the rest of their coverage areas use Aruba AP's and they have indicated that they want to completely retire their Cisco WLC's. Because we host some of their SSID's on our controllers and can tunnel them to their 2504, they get all of their WiFi traffic coming from our network, however my org can only connect to our SSIDs on their campus in certain areas.
    The solution I have been asked to provide is to find a way to continue providing some sort of anchor mobility services between our WLC's and their Aruba controllers. My org maintains that we do not want to simply hand them a layer 2 interface for security reasons, but they want our SSIDs to be available in all areas of the partner org's campus and vice versa. So far I have stalled the partner org's plans to retire their WLC's by telling them that retiring their WLC's will completely break WiFi between orgs, but they are adamant that some sort of A/M solution must be found.
    Is there any way to do some sort of A/M between a WLC and Aruba controller and if so, is there any documentation showing configuration examples etc?
    Thanks,
    John

    Hi John,
    I do not think it will work. Even if it get working somehow, it will be operation nightmare to troubleshoot & fix a issue since both vendor will say it is NOT supported solution.
    What about if you ask them to advertise your SSID (assuming it is dot1x) on their APs as another SSID on their network, but pointing it to your RADIUS & DHCP for IP connectivity (you do not have layer 2 requiremnt for this & can do this as long as you have L3 communication between each other)
    HTH
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

Maybe you are looking for

  • Issue with Goods Issue.....

    Hi gurus, I am working on an interface where I need to do goods Issue and for this I have written the following code, but my return statement is returning this error" Goods movement not possible with mvmt type 201" data: begin of it_input_file occurs

  • MacBook Pro died, can I restore back up from previous OS to New Macbook Pro with Mavericks on it?

    My son's (grad student) MacBook Pro's logic board went out two weeks ago. We have a new one coming tommorrow, which has Mavericks. His back up from the older computer has the previous operating system - is he going to run into any problems restoring

  • My Macbook Pro keeps crashing and it gets very hot, what should I do?

    I have a late 2010 15inch Macbook Pro. Specs: 2.53GHz Intel Core i5 4GB 1067 MHz DDR3 500 GB HD My mac keeps freezing and crashing on me. It might be because it gets really hot, but I really cant say for sure. Its been running slow the past few month

  • Pdf parameters not working

    Firefox does not seem to support PDF parameters in links. e.g. mypdf.pdf#page=6&view=fit It works in IE and Chrome, but only goes to the first page of the pdf in Firefox.

  • About Business object

    hi experts , what is the primary and secondary methods in Business objects?. and what are the primary and secondary methods? if helpful points ll be rewarded. thanks, vel