WLC & Remote AP via WAN link

Hi Team,
During centralized WLC 7500 controller connectivity with branch office AP , can we use the public IP address in WLC management , in case we are not having VPN connectivity between Remote to branch location & only had a internet in both end . Will my remote end AP associate with the centralized WLC controller via public IP ( not a private local IP ) or VPN / MPLS solution is must for communication between WLC & Remote AP.

You can configure OfficeExtend on those AP's. You would enable NAT address on the management and put your public address there. Then you would open udp 5246 and udp 5247 from the public side to the WLC management. Then enable data encryption on the AP after it joins. The AP can be in local FlexConnect mode. Here are some links to look at.
http://jenniferhuber.blogspot.com/2011/11/configuring-3500-series-access-point-as.html?m=1
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/7.0/configuration/guide/c70lwap.html#wp1502674
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Similar Messages

JDBC Thin driver doesn't support writing data into remote database via database link

Dear Oracle Guru:
Please confirm: Oracle JDBC thin driver does not support writing data to remote database via database link.
The following errors occur when trying to write data into a remote database via database link through jdbc thin driver:
ORA-03106: fatal two-task communication protocol error
ORA-02063: preceding line from FDBE.PAPDSRAS1
ORA-02063: preceding 2 lines from PA
SQL statement is a prepared statement using a SQL like: insert into mytable@pa (col1,col2) values (?,?).
Thanks.
null

Thanks, Dan.
I still think it is a driver problem, because I can do similar things in a stored procedure or in PL/SQL Developer to copy records from a local database table to a remote database table via database link (insert into mytable@pa select * from mytable). The value for distributed_transactions of our database is 10.

Remote Connection via WAN not an option

Recently I was gifted a TC from my uncle, who also purchased one. I set mine up and am simply utilizing the built in 500gb hard drive for storage, until I can purchase a TB external drive. He has a TB connected to his TC. We are running 7.4.1 firmware, and the AirPort Utility. I was able to open AirPort Utility and check the box for sharing the disks via WAN and can access the TC from any outside network. However, when we attempt to set up the WAN under the Disks/File Sharing tab, it only gives me the option to: "Share disks over the Internet using Bonjour." Does anyone have any ideas why we don't even have the option of selecting WAN?
Thank you all!
--Kevin

I'm not quite sure why you posted this.
You marked your post as a question... but I can't find one.
Do you have a question or was this somewhat of an "informational" post?

Remote Setup via WAN

I have a wireless network using an AEBS (2009) with 2 AX set up to "Extend a wireless network". Logging onto the AEBS remotely is pretty straightforward: File>Configure Other...> enter the IP and password and I'm good. However I'm not sure how to access the AX units remotely. Is there a procedure for entering their assigned IPs along with the AEBS IP initially or do they have to be set up in Port Forwarding?
I'm pretty new at this but I know that any changes involving passwords need to be done on the AX units first or else they won't appear in AU.
TIA,
Brian

Dang, 46 views and nobody has an opinion on this?
OK, How about this: on the AX options in Airport Utility there is the option to "Allow setup over the Internet using Bonjour"
What does this mean exactly?

Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0 import image via WAN link failed.

Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0 behind NAT that can copy image on device to Cisco Prime infra but can not deploy from Cisco Prime Infra import image from device. How to solve problem,please ?

Have you downloaded and applied the latest Device Pack updates?
PI enhanced ASA support after the initial 2.0 release and the Device Packs incorporate that change.
The README file for Device Packs explains how to install them. (A bug currently does not allow the direct download in PI so you need to follow the method for installation from local storage after you manually download. Here is a link to the download location.

Multi-Row insert/update/delete not working via db-link

App. Version: 2.0.0.00.49
DB: Oracle 9i, not sure about the build
Problem: Multirow Update/Insert/Delete doesn't work via db-link.
Error received: ....ORA-1460: unimplemented or unreasonable conversion requested....
Where: Tabular Form generated via Wizard
Side note: It's working properly when local table(s) is/are used, it's not working via db-link or view.
I've encountered this error with single update/insert/delete operations before, but was able to fix it via using temp-variables (v_xyz := :Px_xyz; as the proposed v('Px_xyz') was really slow with my scripts)...but with the automated DML-action I don't see a way to edit it accordingly.
Workaround found:
1a) Use local* collection on HTML-DB-Server, then write single row updates/deletes/inserts to the remote DB via DB-Link
1b) Use local* table on HTML-DB-Server, then write single row updates/deletes/inserts to the remote DB via DB-Link
* Local = on the same server that HTML-DB is running on...
So,...to my questions:
1. Can someone confirm that this is a "known feature" (aka bug)?
2. Can someone tell me if this "known feature" has been eliminated in the newer version of HTML-DB/APEX (> 2.0.0.00.49)?
Thanks.
Ingo

Hi,
Do you have a small test case program that demonstrates this? A JDeveloper project showing what exactly is the problem when trying to use the BDB SQL JDBC driver to insert data into the BDB SQL database? What do you mean by "not working", do you get any errors, you do not get errors but you do not see the data in the database etc?
What are the versions of Java, JDeveloper, ADF and BDB SQL you are using, and on what OS?
Regards,
Andrei

ZCC remote contol terribly slow over WAN links compared to RC via ZDM 7 or RDC

I think the subject tells all. The connection is via a direct VPN
connection of the remote controlling PC to the LAN of the controlled PC
- so there is no proxy inbetween.
I disabled encryption but that did not help much.
Part of the problem seems to be, that Windows RDC and ZDM 7 remote
control are able to saturate the WAN link during a page refresh,
whereas the ZCC remote viewer only uses 1/4 to 1/2 of the link
bandwidth at most.
W. Prindl

Correct.
If you enable "Password Based" remote control in the RC policy, you can
use that password to remote control the PC from virtually any VNC Client.
Clearly this gets around some of the security features provided with ZCM
Security, but allows for interoperation with other VNC Clients if you
wanted to use them for some reason.
On 5/14/2010 6:06 PM, kjhurni wrote:
>
> craig_wilson;1974693 Wrote:
>> Password vs Rights based Security.
>>
>> Rights Based Security is what Novell provides on top of VNC for added
>> security.
>>
>> Password Based Remote Control is VNC security, but Novell allows for
>> central control of the password as well.
>>
>> Password Based Remote Control can be enabled or disabled via your
>> Remote
>> Control policy.
>>
>>
>> On 5/13/2010 2:22 PM, W_ Prindl wrote:
>>> Same question as you ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
>> Novell Knowledge Partner
>>
>> Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
>>
>> Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
>> These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational
>> human.
>
> So with password-based security you can you "any" VNC viewer, provided
> you enter the correct userid/password to gain access?
>
> With rights-based you have to use the one from ZCM?
>
> (Just checking to make sure I'm understanding correctly)
>
>
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Knowledge Partner
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

Lap not joining over a wan link

hi
i have 2 wism running on 6509 chassis and i have access points in remote branches. the lap is not joining the wism. here is the situation:
lap can ping the controllers
lap is getting ip address
option 43 is there on the vlan
dns entry for the wlc is there.
however, when i checked the lap boot: it s getting an ip address and gives the command prompt.
the below debugging on the wlc gives nothing:
debug capwap events
debug capwap errors
debug mac addr <mac addr>
the wan link is private wan running ospf on both routers from each end.
I see no point why this lap is not joining
any idea?

Hi,
According to your description, I understand that all attachments in Outlook are opened slowly since updating Outlook 2003 to 2013. Please confirm whether all users encounter this issue. Also check whether the issue continues in cached mode and in OWA.
Based on your post, I suggest we can try to disable the following add-ins to check whether the issue persists:
Acrobat PDFMaker office com addin
symantec endpoint protection outlook addin
If there is any updates, please feel free to let us know.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

New SCCM deployment for 10,000 users, single domain across 2 sites connected with a fast WAN link

Hi,
I'm looking at rolling out an SCCM 2012 deployment in my environment. We have 10,000 users, a single AD domain, several thousand Windows 7 laptops and desktops, as well as few hundred MAC OS 10.6 devices and we currently use WSUS for updates. We have
2 main sites with the users equally split across the sites and we have an internal PKI.
I'm looking at doing the following:
- deploying a single primary SCCM 2012 site server (site A)
- 1 or 2 distribution points in site B
The main things I'm after are:
- Computer inventory (MAC + Windows)
- Application deployment (MAC + Windows)
- Hardware inventory (MAC + windows)
- Deploy updates (MAC + windows)
- Remotely power on devices and patch overnight
I'm aiming to setup an SCCM infrastructure and aim to achieve the above in a month.
What I'm not sure about is:
- if I need a secondary site server?
- How I should handle WSUS updates ? I don't know if SCCM can leverage the current WSUS infrastructure or whether it's better just to get rid of it and install the WSUS role as part of SCCM?
- I believe that to enable application deployment for MACs I need to install a PKI certificate on my distribution points. If do I this, presumably all my Windows clients will also connect via HTTPs. Are there any downsides to doing this?
If anyone has deployed a similar setup I'd be keen to hear from them.
Thanks in advance

1. WSUS: Be careful here. If you just remove the WSUS policy computers can just revert back to their default setting which would be to connect to the Internet at 3am and automatically install the updates. I've seen this happen on a large site and it is not
pretty. It's better practice to leave the policy in place but to disable automatic updates (or you could change the WSUS server to be your new ConfigMgr WSUS instance - this would have the same effect).
2. Secondary Sites: It's not uncommon for customers to start without the secondary site and monitor the WAN link for excessive traffic. The secondary site can be introduced afterwards if it is deemed neccessary.
Gerry Hampson | Blog:
www.gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.ie | LinkedIn:
Gerry Hampson | Twitter:
@gerryhampson

Error not getting while executing procedure via db link

Hi,
I am executing a database procedure remotely via database link from SQL prompt (SQL > EXECUTE REPLICATE_DATA@DBLK_SALE), and while getting any connectivity issue system is not giving any error (it is just showing as not responding)..
if I am executing the same procedure directly in the remote database then it is giving error as
ORA-02055: distributed update operation failed; rollback required
ORA-02068: following severe error from DBLK_SALE
ORA-03135: connection lost contact
Can someone can help me on this
Regards

Dear 823755,
You can think the Database link as a new sqlplus session to the distributed database. You should have defined a user to connect to that remote database and the user has to have the necessary privileges to revoke the relevant object. Does it have that privilege? Can you even connect to the remote database instance?
SQL> SELECT * FROM DUAL@DBLK_SALE;Regards.
Ogan

Problems with query via Database-Link (Oracle 7.3.4)

I made the following simple query via database-link.
select count (*) from [email protected]
I got the result in about 200 miliseconds.
Then I4ve tried the following query.
select * from [email protected]
It took about 2 hours end ended with an error message "ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel"
So I made another choice
select * from [email protected] where rownum <=1
Took about 200 miliseconds.
So I made the query again an changed only the number of rownums,until I was at rownum <=8
then it went sleeping again(I've canceled the statement because I didn't want to wait 2 hours again).
We made the same things from another server with the same database-link on the same remote server
and we had no problems.
Any Idea???

No, network is OK!
Other links are running, I have also no problems when I connect directly to the remote server.

EEM -automatic shut down or switch over of WAN link in OSPF when packet drop increase

Hi,
Need help..
can any one help me how can EEM help for automatic shut down or switch over of WAN link in OSPF when packet drop increase a predefined level.
I have a set up different branches connected together...OSPF is the routing protocol and need to communicate with two branches via hub locations.
need to shut or switch some percent of traffic from primary to back up when packet drop in the link.

I am not sure EEM can do what you want.
Another option could be to use SLA tacking/monitoring. But you will fall back to the new route when you lose some percentage of pings, you can't switch only part of the traffic.
I hope it helps.
PK

Windows server 2003 Remote desktop over WAN problem.

Ok so problem is there is a 2003 windows server in my office. Any computer phone etc. can connect to it via Remote desktop if they are in the LAN network. I have port forwarded 3389 , disabled firewalls , there is no antivirus software on the server.
BUT I cannon log in over WAN. Heres the problem.
I type in the WAN ip I connect with credentials.
This is what i get:
Connecting...
Negotiating credentials...
Then it just suddenly force closes.
Also tried from a Windows 8 PC , when trying to connect it INSTANTLY throws me an error saying:
This computer cant connect to the remote computer. If the problem continues contact etc..
No matter where i try , a pc , a laptop , a phone , a tablet it just force closes. I can see that the devices are able to see the server and are trying to connect , but the connection just force closes for no reason and no error is shown. Also I dont see
anything in the event viewer on the server. The credentials are correct also. And the port is forwarded correctly.
Where could the problem be?

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
As you have commented that you have forwarded port correctly at windows end, but still suggest you to check whether you have port forwarded on Router which you are using for WAN connections.
Can your local system can make successful ping to the remote server from WAN connections?
For testing you can telnet <router ip> 3389 and if you get blank screen then it confirm that port has been forwarded.
It might happens that there is port assignment conflict taken place, so check with “netstat –a –o” and see port 3389 is not being used by other application, if that is the case then change the port.
You can refer following article for more troubleshooting steps (Point 2)
Remote Desktop disconnected or can’t connect to remote computer or Remote Desktop server (Terminal Server) that is running Windows Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2477023
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support

Video Conferencing over Low speed WAN links

Hi there,
Can somebody explain possible point-to-nultipoint video conferencing solution over low speed WAN links ?
( I have central site and about 20 remote sites - hub and spoke configuraition)
a. What is the minimum BW requirement
b. If using Cisco Video advantage at users desktop how do we select the proper MCU at the central site ?

Buffer 15 to 30 seconds. Make sure to tell them there will be
a long load time. There really isn't much you can do besides
that.

Synching/Caching Critical Patches across WAN links

It is my understanding that all Microsoft Critical Patches will automatically cache(download), create themselves as bundles and become part of the content-repo which will automatically sync between all primary servers. If I have the check box for caching to the Satellites, they will also automatically cache to the satellites.
Does this happen immediately upon download/caching of the critical patch? Does this mean that if I have 150 remote sites connected over WAN links, my corporate site will be flooding my WAN links with these updates all AT THE SAME TIME? I have both a 10.2 and a 10.3beta testing - I can at least control in 10.3 that it will only happen at night and only take so much of the remote sites' bandwidth, but that still doesn't help out my corporate site's bandwidth if it's trying to send out to 150 remote sites. Any thoughts, suggestions, workarounds or clarification?
Is there any way to know when/what time a patch actually downloaded/cached to the Primary Servers content-repo OR to the Satellite content-repo?

The "Cache automatically to satellites" specifies what to cache, whereas the replication interval (Under Server Hierarchy->Configure Satellite Server) specifies when. So the sequence would be:
1. Keep the "Cache automatically to satellites" checked.
2. Set the replication inteval for the satellites (ZCC->Configuration->Server Hierarchy->Configure Satellite Server) to something very high (say, 999 days). This will prevent satellites from replicating content by themselves
3. Go ahead and set up a scheduler task to run zac wake-cdp at the required time.
Others,
Any other suggestions?

WLC & Remote AP via WAN link

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for