WLC Seeing It's Own LAP as Rogue

I just finished a deployment of WLC 4.2.112.0 with about 30 AP's. Everything is working fine, but the WLC is showing an AP as rogue, not wired with a radio MAC address that is the same as one of my functioning registered AP's.
It doesn't appear to be causing any problems other than the WLC showing it as rogue.
Has anyone else come across this?
Thanks,
Jeff

Jeff we see this, too. We had a lot of Bugs with older releases concerning this issue since 2006 (3.2) but all should be fixed with current 4.2.112.0. We had not open a new SR yet for the latest release.
If you happen to get a new BugID for these please let me know.

Similar Messages

Itunes is no longer detecting my iphone on my own lap top, though it is on my husbands!?!? I have tried deleting itunes and reinstalling, still cannot get itunes on my lap top to pick up my phone?

Any ideas welcome, I need my iphone to sync with my own lap top!

Here's the best place to start -> iOS: Device not recognized in iTunes for Windows.
Did it stop being recognized after updating iTunes?
After taking a look at the document, are you able to start the Apple Mobile Device Service and is the Apple Mobile Device USB Driver is installed?
WTH.

Get every user to see ONLY its own created variants

Our system is being accessed by different users.
When executing reports, users save their own variants into the system. However, we would like to restrict the access from all users to all saved variants. The goal is to get every user to see ONLY its own created variants.
I believe there is an user-exit that combined with some access controls can provide us with this functionality. Do you know if it is possible? and if the user-exit really exists?. Do you know the user-exit name?.
Thank you in advance.

Oscar
If there is a user exit, you would have to apply this to all of the reports and programs.
This is probably a bigger task than getting the users to change their variants to a single entry.

We can't see details of own appointments marked as private in Scheduling Assistant.

We have found that when you mark an appointment as private and then go into the scheduling assistant it appears as a private appointment.
We can't see the deatails of our own appointments to compare with other people we want to attend meetings.
Has anyone come across this issue before?
Any and all help is much appreciated.

We have found that when you mark an appointment as private and then go into the scheduling assistant it appears as a private appointment.
We can't see the deatails of our own appointments to compare with other people we want to attend meetings.
Has anyone come across this issue before?
Any and all help is much appreciated.
Update: This is for Outlook 2010.
Hi, has anyone come across this issue before or know anyone who has?
Thank you.

WLC restarting on its own.

Hi all,
We've got a pair of WiSMs installed in our Cat6K, running VSS.
From time to time, the primary WiSM will suddenly fail and secondary will take over.
Unfortunately when the secondary takes over, NO APs will associate with the WLC. What is the reason? And why would the WiSM just suddenly fail on its on?
Running version 7.4.121.0 for both, in AP SSO redundancy.
Switchover History[9]:
Previous Active = 172.24.x.x, Current Active = 172.24.x.x
Switchover Reason = Active controller failed, Switchover Time = Wed Jan 28 22:26:54 2015
Switchover History[10]:
Previous Active = 172.24.x.x, Current Active = 172.24.x.x
Switchover Reason = User initiated, Switchover Time = Wed Jan 28 22:35:45 2015
edit : I can verify that after the secondary WiSM takes over, the licenses also gets adopted by the secondary, but no APs will associate.

There are multiple BUGs which you can refer :
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo94185
Symptom:
WiSM2 on code 7.4.121.0 in HA SSO crashes causing the controllers to constantly fail over and fail back between active and standby controllers.
Crash seen due to Task Name: nmspRxServerTask
System Stack
Frame 0: 0x10012c20 create_crash_dump+7156
Frame 1: 0x10011a18 create_crash_dump+2540
Frame 2: 0x10007ab8 sigsegv_handler+6168
Frame 3: 0x45d803b0 license_xos_thread_create+871837312
Frame 4: 0x11bdab48 MD5_Update+168
Frame 5: 0x11bae424 tls1_mac+340
Frame 6: 0x11baafb0 ssl3_read_bytes+1624
Frame 7: 0x11ba7f90 ssl3_read+120
Frame 8: 0x1029a638 doSSLRecvLoop+464
Frame 9: 0x1029aff0 NetReceiveLoop+424
Frame 10: 0x1029b3dc locpRxSocket+540
Frame 11: 0x10b0e858 osapiTaskAppKeySelfSet+304
Frame 12: 0x120292b0 license_xos_thread_create+2211200
Frame 13: 0x12089c4c license_xos_thread_create+2606876
Conditions:
WiSM2 in HA SSO on code 7.4.121.0
Workaround:
None.
Controller reboots and comes up on its own
Further Problem Description:
This is a hospital network
Issue was first noticed when customer tried to restart services on the primary MSE in the network (MSE in HA)
This caused a flood of error messages on the controller (error logs attached). It took about two hours for MSEs to come up and stabilize. Shortly after this the active controller crashed, failing over to standby. After some time, the standby WLC crashed failing back to active
Customer setup has 4 WiSM2's in HA SSO and crash has occured multiple times on two of the controller pairs.
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCui35807

Can not see Stored Procedures owned by "Code Owner"

Post Author: BinChen
CA Forum: Deployment
I am using Data Source defined with "CR Oracle ODBC Driver 5.0" in "Data Source (ODBC)".
But in Crystal Report XI, I can not see CodeOwner when I can created a new connection using ODBC (RDO).
I can see CodeOwner and all SP defined under it when I use "Oracle Server" directly or use sqlplus.

Post Author: BinChen
CA Forum: Deployment
I'm using Window XP with Oracle 10g2R
To be more clear,
I have an ODBC Data Source defined as "DEV" and when I created a connection using ODBC, I can only see some database account section like: APP, APPREF, PUBLIC, SYS, SUSTEM. But I can not see CodeOwner.
If I connected without using ODBC, I can also see CODEOWNER and then all its stored procedures.
So why I can not see Stored Procedures defined under CODEOWNER using ODBC?
I have an exsiting report, even I can not see CODEOWNER, but I have no problem to run and preview the report also to "verify database".

WLC displays different IP for LAP in GUI

Hi,
I have the following issue with one controller AIR-WLC2112-K9 with 2 LAP .When I ask the info by GUI for the the LAPs in Wireless ----> AP name (click) ---->General the info displayed in "IP config" does not match, for the field static IP is shown the IP 172.18.98.2 but the line above "IP address" shows 156.70.30.5. Controller has IP 156.70.30.3
I verified by console with the command show lwapp ip config and the IP is correct. 172.18.98.2.
any idea?

hi leolaohoo ,
thanks a lot for your info.
version is 5.2.193.0 , is a new one controller....but ver is older than yours.
do you have the cisco's link for this issue??
regards

That i see in my own eyes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the dd/dts stop to bundle cause creative doesnt cares anymore about this,stop to pay the dolby labratories and dts systems...for developing in their card and so chose another staff a bit hard and no expenci've!!!its rediculus.....but this is the true in my own eyes....x-fis now is like the onboard cards cheap and no use of hardware accelerator,but good of on boards is that has the avantage of dts interacti've and dd li've for free without crap lincens that make u system a garbage!!so why dont use ur onboard cause the x-fi has more audio quality? so what? do you wanna play this game of find the bug and lies? im not 4 sure!!!i chose and i buy something that is the best of the best!!!!!!!!with bsds and bugs,i cant say what and i hope u think about it....c yaaaaaa

the dd/dts stop to bundle cause creative doesnt cares anymore about this,stop to pay the dolby labratories and dts systems...for developing in their card and so chose another staff a bit hard and no expenci've!!!its rediculus.....but this is the true in my own eyes....x-fis now is like the onboard cards cheap and no use of hardware accelerator,but good of on boards is that has the avantage of dts interacti've and dd li've for free without crap lincens that make u system a garbage!!so why dont use ur onboard cause the x-fi has more audio quality? so what? do you wanna play this game of find the bug and lies? im not 4 sure!!!i chose and i buy something that is the best of the best!!!!!!!!with bsds and bugs,i cant say what and i hope u think about it....c yaaaaaa

That i see in my own eye

the dd/dts stop to bundle cause creative doesnt cares anymore about this,stop to pay the dolby labratories and dts systems...for developing in their card and so chose another staff a bit hard and no expenci've!!!its rediculus.....but this is the true in my own eyes....x-fis now is like the onboard cards cheap and no use of hardware accelerator,but good of on boards is that has the avantage of dts interacti've and dd li've for free without crap lincens that make u system a garbage!!so why dont use ur onboard cause the x-fi has more audio quality so what do you wanna play this game of find the bug and lies im not 4 sure!!!i chose and i buy something that is the best of the best!!!!!!!!with bsds and bugs,i cant say what and i hope u think about it....c yaaaaaa

This thread is likely going to end in a flamewar. Please exercise restrain and tact in your commentary or opinions, this is a public forum.

I can't join LAP to WLC 5508 in difference subnet

i can't join LAP to WLC in difference subnet now i create 2 interface [management / ap-manager]
management : 192.168.1.1 / 24
ap-manager : 192.168.1.2 / 24 vlan 10
ap-manager2 : 192.168.2.2 / 24 vlan 11
ap-manager3 : 192.168.3.2 / 24 vlan 12
connect with core switch 3 interface [access port vlan same wlc]
or how create wlc interface for join with LAP please advise me or send capture screen for me to create all interface
Thank you for best support.

I created a video actually how to configure option 43 on my site.
http://www.my80211.com/cisco-wlc-labs/2009/7/4/cisco-dhcp-option-43-configuration-nugget.html
So when you fire up an AP it goes through a few steps to find the controller.
1) It does a broadcast and if your APs are on the same VLAN as your apmangers/managment then she will connect
2) If it isnt on the sanme vlan it will attempt to reslove CISCO-LWAPP-CONTROLLER or CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER. This is where you would need to create an A-record in your DNS server and reslove it to your MANAGEMENT controller IP address
3) Also Option43. When your AP gets an IP address, you can add option 43 to the scope. Option 43 again tells the AP where to find the controller.
Now you can do a manual prime to these as well. Extend your managment vlan to a switch and have the APs join. Once they take the download and config they will know the controllers ip address. And then you can deploy them on different vlans and they will join ...
Does this make sense?

Removing WLCs from list in NVRAM for deployed LAPs

Hi,
Here is a question, which I really would like to have an answer on. I have been searching for this, and can not find any on this. I am up to the point where I start to think it is simply not possible.
I would like to remove all existing WLCs from NVRAM in my LAPs. Simple, you may think, just boot it without registering and perform the command "clear lwapp private-config", and allthough this is through and I'm sure it will work, it would require me to organize about 300 LAPs to be shipped back to me so I can console into it and perform the command.
Another thing I thought of was clearing the config from WCS, but I found this only clears the config and not the list of previously joined controllers stored in NVRAM.
The background of my request is that we started out with WLCs back in code 3.1, and there it was recommended to have one mobility group if you wanted to have an anchor guest controller.
Today, we are running 5.2 and the number of WLCs we have in place is 21 and growing.
I believe that since we went to 4.2 we started having problems with LAPs sometimes registering to the wrong controller.
We have been troubelshooting this a lot, and with the current discoverey mechanism, where the LWAPP discovery respons includes all controllers in the mobility group, and aso the previously joined/learned controlelrs, we do understand why it happens.
So, the new updated design is to separate into different mobility groups and still make the necessary relationships to the guest anchor controller in the old mobility group. Works all fine. However, it did not resolve the problem of LAPs sometimes registering to the wrong controller.
And it makes sense if you read the documents, the LAP has learned and stored about all the WLCs in NVRAM, so it can select any, if for some reason the primary fails (it only happens ofcourse when the primary fails).
So, to ensure it will no longer rehome to another controller, I do need to remove all previuosly learned WLCs from NVRAM, but can not seem to find a way to do this without having console access, and I have about 300 LAPs in different countries, over appr. 30 locations.....
Help!!!!!
Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this,
Leo

Hi,
Are you convinced this removes stored information in NVRAM for previously joined controllers. So far, my understanding was that only a factry default reset would do so, not the clear all config.
I do understand the clear all config does remove entries for primary, secondary and tertiary controllers but I'm still in doubt if that would ensure the AP will not wander to previously joined controllers.
Kind regards,
Leo

User cannot see its own profile

I just configured Identity Manager and Access Manager. But logging in to User Manager as a normal user, and clicking on "My Profile" subtab result a message "You do not have sufficient access rights". What is missing here.
Thanks for any response.

Thanks Ryan.
Now I can see the user own profile after configuring searchbase and attribute access control.
Now I found another problem and hope you have answer for that, or someone else does. I log as a Master Administrator (also a Master Identity Administrator). When I go to User Manager tab and clicking on Create User Identity subtab, I got "You do not have sufficient access rights" error message. What do I need to configure to let a master user to be able to do this?
Thanks.

Can't see my own sampler instruments or presets in 64 bit version.

If I load up 9.0.0, I can see all my own presets and sampler instruments. But they are not showing up in 9.1.
I have searched and seem to be the only one with this?
anyone else?
Keefy

I was using Logic 9.0.2 before I upgraded to 9.1. After installing the update it has left me with 2 versions. I now have 9.1.1. which is called Logic Pro, and I also have another Logic which was automatically created and labeled Logic 9.0.0. I have checked and it is 9.0.0. (1660.11).
The problem that I have is with the 9.1.1. not seeing my presets and sampler instruments. Not in 64bit mode or 32bit mode.
** Just managed to sort it!
All of my Sampler Instruments/Samples are on a separate drive and are aliased. It looks like the 9.1.1. version looks in the Macintosh HD/Library/Application Support for the Logic Folder with all the settings. So I have aliased all individual folders (ie Bass, Piano, Synth) as apposed to the sampler Inst folder and it works!
I take it that it no longer references to the home (user/libary/application support/Logic) for Insts & Plug in settings.
Phew!
Okay, cheers all and back to work I go ! ! ! !

How to avoid interferences caused by rogues APs

Hi Everybody,
I have a WLC running well with 10 LAPs.
The problem that I have approximatively 60 Rogues APs and I have a lot of perturbations in signals (noise, interference, ...) caused by theses APs.
How to avoid these interferences ?? is it the classification Malicieous APs ??

wow! belay that...DO NOT CONTAIN THE ROGUES!
Unless you can prove they are in your network and shouldn't be, there can be legal ramifications for doing so.
What you need to do first, is adjust the sensiitivity for rogues. by default it's -128, change that to -75. Once you've done this, then you can evalutate which rogues are in your network, or belong to neighboring businesses. For neighboring, go talk to their IT staff and see if you can get them to lower power so you aren't interferring with each other, cause if you see them, they probably see you as well.
HTH,
Steve
Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered

Rogue AP: Question

I need a bit of info with the below topics.
Q1. What is a Rogue AP?
Q2. WLC 4400 is detecting a number of rogue access points from neighboring buildings. How should the WLC 4400 deal with these rogue access points?
Q3. Can the WLC 4400 block these accees points from broadcasting their SSID's into our air space?
Regards,
Colm

For the Clases, you have the ability to define what criteria must be met for a roge to be called friendly or malicious. Under the Security tab > Wireless Protection Policy, Rogue Policies, Rogue Rules.
Class Type:
unclassified <--- AP detected but not matching any policy
friendly <--- AP matches the criteria of a friendly AP
malicious <--- AP matches the criteria of a malicious AP
Update Status:
Contain <--Contain the AP, uses our own AP to spoof the AP to get the clients to join "us" instead of "them" , once again, you need to be real careful with this, as if you are containing your neighbors, there can be reprocussions
Alert <-- Just a message saying there is a rogue

WLC Seeing It's Own LAP as Rogue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for